Slashdot Mirror


Bizarre Hexagon On Saturn May Be 180 Miles Tall (space.com)

Iwastheone shares a report from Space.com: The weird hexagon swirling around Saturn's north pole is much taller than scientists had thought, a new study suggests. Researchers have generally regarded the 20,000-mile-wide (32,000 kilometers) hexagon -- a jet stream composed of air moving at about 200 mph (320 km/h) -- as a lower-atmosphere phenomenon, restricted to the clouds of Saturn's troposphere. But the bizarre structure actually extends about 180 miles (300 km) above those cloud tops, up into the stratosphere, at least during the northern spring and summer, a new study suggests. The hexagon, which surrounds a smaller circular vortex situated at the north pole, has existed for at least 38 years; NASA's Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 spacecraft spotted the sharp-cornered feature when they flew by Saturn in 1980 and 1981, respectively. Scientists started to get much more detailed looks at the hexagon in 2004, when NASA's Cassini spacecraft began orbiting the ringed planet. But Cassini's hexagon observations were pretty much confined to the troposphere for a decade after its arrival; springtime didn't come to Saturn's north until 2009, and low temperatures in the stratosphere continued to compromise measurements by the probe's Composite Infrared Spectrometer (CIRS) instrument for another five years.

The formation of a stratospheric hexagon appears to be tied to the warming brought on by the change of seasons, the research team wrote in the new study. Indeed, Cassini spied a vortex high above the south pole during its early years at Saturn, when that hemisphere was enjoying summer. (Saturn takes 30 Earth years to orbit the sun, so seasons on the ringed planet last about 7.5 years apiece.) But the southern stratospheric vortex wasn't hexagonal. And neither, for that matter, is the vortex that spins around the south pole lower down, in the tropospheric clouds, the researchers said. "This could mean that there's a fundamental asymmetry between Saturn's poles that we're yet to understand, or it could mean that the north polar vortex was still developing in our last observations and kept doing so after Cassini's demise," study lead author Leigh Fletcher, of the University of Leicester in England, said in a statement.

2 of 106 comments (clear)

  1. Re:American scientists are fine with SI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Disadvantaging american schoolkids in their STEM studies is most definitely "mishandling of science".

    Not only do they have to start their careers in science playing remedial catchup, but are disadvantaged throughout their whole lives when talking to others about science domestically. On top of that they have to be perpetually on the lookout for incorrect conversions and on avoiding imperial slip-ups when writing science papers.

    If you don't see this as a problem, all it says is that you're not a scientist and so you just don't care.

  2. Re:Sharp corners? Miles above clouds? by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. If you look at the picture, it isn't a sharp corner. The curve radius is bigger then the earth.
    2. Hexagons are natural aspects of squishing circles together. We see it in bubbles forming together and what bees make. It appears that there is some sort of outward force fighting the inward forces.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.