Slashdot Mirror


'I've Seen the Future of Consumer AI, and it Doesn't Have One' (theregister.co.uk)

Andrew Orlowski of The Register recounts all the gadgets supercharged with AI that he came across at IFA tradeshow last week -- and wonders what value AI brought to the table. He writes: I didn't see a blockchain toothbrush at IFA in Berlin last week, but I'm sure there was one lurking about somewhere. With 30 vast halls to cover, I didn't look too hard for it. But I did see many things almost as tragic that no one could miss -- AI being squeezed into almost every conceivable bit of consumer electronics. But none were convincing. If ever there was a solution looking for a problem, it's ramming AI into gadgets to show of a company's machine learning prowess. For the consumer it adds unreliability, cost and complexity, and the annoyance of being prompted.

[...] Back to LG, which takes 2018's prize for sticking AI into a superfluous gadget. The centrepiece of its AI efforts this year is a robot, ClOi. Put Google Assistant or Alexa on wheels, and you have ClOi. I asked the booth person what exactly ClOi could do to be told "it can take notes for your shopping list." Why wasn't this miracle of the Fourth Industrial Revolution let loose on the LG floor? I wondered -- a question answered by this account of ClOi's debut at CES in January. Clearly things haven't improved much -- this robot buddy was kept indoors.

8 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. Stupid industry fads by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Funny

    3D printer in every home will fundamentally change human society

    IoT internet connected belt buckles and toothbrushes will take over the world

    AI will revolutionize consumer electronics

    Net PC from Sun will dominate the computer industry (this one is really old)

    1. Re:Stupid industry fads by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Excessive hype is always followed by a trough of disillusionment. But as the TOD fades, plenty of mature, practical applications are likely to emerge. The technological naysayers are usually even more wrong than the hypesters.

      Hype cycle

    2. Re:Stupid industry fads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As much as I am a nerd, I blame "nerds" for this. There is this whole new fad of being a "techie", watching Big Bang Theory, owning a Tesla, and generally being absolutely ignorant about real science, technology and math while "pretending" to be a nerd. I used "pretending" but there may be some legitimate attempt but it is hard to tell if someone is a fake nerd or just a stupid nerd. I think this trend partly follows from women trying to follow the (tech) money and then men trying to follow the women.

      This has led to a culture of "techies/nerds" that don't understand one bit how the underlying technology works or how it can be brought to market. All they care about is being able to spew bullshit about how awesomely nerdy they are. Unlike "real" nerds, they have a very shallow understanding of what they are talking about and easily fall for marketing. They totally read that article on self driving cars and they are going to be out net year and totally revolutionize cities and travel. Next, AI will steal all our jobs and we will be unemployed, Google figured it all out yesterday.

      TLDR: Fake nerds need something to talk about and buy to show how nerdy they are. Marketing departments across the world have noticed and capitalized on that to the maximum.

    3. Re:Stupid industry fads by CaptainDork · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If smart phones and tablets are any indicator ...

      AI, too, is an evolutionary dead end.

      It's a buzz word with a vacuous definition.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    4. Re:Stupid industry fads by JMJimmy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The thing no one can consider is time.

      "AI" being jammed into things now is probably lame, awkward, and of very limited use. Much like computers were back in the punch card days with devices that. Less than 100 years later we've got computers in our pocket. We are in the early days of AI - we'll look back on it decades from now as we do with things like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      This article is just another example of someone who can't see past their nose to the road ahead and the million different branching paths this technology could take.

  2. Re:Now With AI! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gee, I could have sworn we already HAD the AI craze back in the late 80s. Or was it early 90s?

    It was the 1980s. It had faded long before 1990.

    But there was an earlier AI craze in the 1960s, based on perceptrons. That faded by 1970.

    The 1980 AI hype cycle was driven by "expert systems" and "Lisp machines".

    The latest cycle started in 2006 with the publication of the seminal paper on deep learning, and has so far lasted far longer than any previous AI hype cycle.

  3. OP must be joking... by JoeDuncan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... because consumer AI is *ALREADY* ubiquitous and all around us.

    From the face detection in your phone, to the fuzzy logic controllers in washing machines, to the ant colony algorithms being used to route network traffic, to finding directions with google maps, to Netflix and Amazon's recommendation algorithms, to OCR for cheques and mail, to NEST thermostats, to robot vacuum cleaners and lawn mowers, to expert systems in medical diagnosis... (I could keep going)

    AI in consumer products is literally *already* ALL around us.

    Saying that consumer AI "has no future" is like looking around at the world today and saying "personal cars have no future" - it's completely idiotic because to anyone with half an ounce of perception that future is ALREADY here.

    It's like looking at a forest and claiming there are no trees

  4. Re:Getting concerned myself by sheramil · · Score: 4, Funny

    What the hell does a fridge need a screen for?

    You can connect it to a webcam inside the fridge and see if the light goes out when you close the door.