Slashdot Mirror


Creator of TempleOS, Terry Davis, Has Passed Away (osnews.com)

OSNews reports: Terrence Andrew Davis, sole creator and developer of TempleOS (née LoseThos), has passed away at age 48. Davis suffered from mental illness -- schizophrenia -- which had a severe impact on his life. He claimed he created his operating system after having spoken with and receiving instructions from god, and he was a controversial figure, also here on OSNews, for his incomprehensible rants and abrasive style towards OSNews readers and staff. We eventually had to ban him, but our then-editor Kroc Kamen worked with him in 2010 to publish an article about his operating system despite his ban.... I hope he found peace -- wherever he may be.
Davis spent 10 years building "an operating system to talk to God," according to a 2014 profile in Motherboard, which described its welcome screen as "a riot of 16-color, scrolling, blinking text" resembling early DOS-based GUIs. (Wikipedia describes its interface as "a mixture of DOS and Turbo C.") To build his operating system, Terry wrote 121,176 lines of code.

An anonymous reader writes: Davis learned assembly language on a Commodore 64 before he'd graduated from high school. He eventually got a master's degree in electrical engineering from Arizona State University, and as an undergrad he worked briefly at Ticketmaster, programming operating systems. His later life included time in mental hospitals and some homelessness, as well as living at home with his parents after his schizophrenia was diagnosed and treated.

In 2014 Motherboard pieced together his lifestyle from emailed updates Terry sent from his Ubuntu desktop. They concluded he was living on disability, and spent most of his time coding, surfing the web, "or using the output from the National Institute of Standards and Technology randomness beacon to talk to God -- he posts the results on his webpage as 'Terry Davis' Rants.'" Their article describes him as "God's lonely programmer," saying Davis "offered the world a temple to a God who speaks only to him, and is still waiting for everyone else to listen."

Terry's death was confirmed by a local Oregon newspaper, and the official web site for TempleOS now also includes this death notice:

In the wake of Terry A. Davis' passing his family has requested supporters of his donate to "organizations working to ease the pain and suffering caused by mental illness" such as

174 comments

  1. Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's French for "born", and specifically the female form. Why would you write that? That's to indicate the maiden name of a person, or more rarely when a pseudonym is used.... I don't think a OS is birthed.

    1. Re:Née? by msmash+(Ultra+Mod) · · Score: 0

      How dare you say such insulting thing after poor man pass away. You say something nice, positive instead below.

    2. Re:Née? by fibonacci8 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's French for "born", and specifically the female form. Why would you write that? That's to indicate the maiden name of a person, or more rarely when a pseudonym is used.... I don't think a OS is birthed.

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they hate it when you do that.

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    3. Re: Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes use positive key words like good and acceptance or other thing we can make everyone feel good about. You evil or something?

    4. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's also English for "originally called". Since the rest of the text is in English, I'll assume the author chose to use the English definition for the word.

      I am aware English "stole" the word from French. French stole many words from Latin and corrupted their meanings, too.

    5. Re:Née? by Calydor · · Score: 1

      It may be because I'm not a native English speaker, but in all my years reading and speaking English with friends all over the planet I have never seen the word 'née' used before.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    6. Re:Née? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      It may be because I'm not a native English speaker, but in all my years reading and speaking English with friends all over the planet I have never seen the word 'née' used before.

      I'm a native English speaker and I've seen it used plenty of times.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    7. Re:Née? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      It's a bit old-fashioned but still in use.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    8. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is sometimes used in encyclopedias and newspapers. For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stevie_Wonder

      As for the gender mistake, yes, it's there. It's also understandable as if you only know English the concept of changing adjectives for gender is practically non-existent. The only one that comes to mind that's common is handsome vs. beautiful.

    9. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      omfg no. It means exactly what it means in French. And there are two words, née and né, just like there are two words fiancé and fiancée depending on whether the person is a man or a woman. when you misuse words you just look stupid.

    10. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are no longer the knights who say Nee!
      We are now the knights who say: ekki-ekki-ekki-pitang-zoom-boing!

    11. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The only one that comes to mind that's common is handsome vs. beautiful.

      They aren't synonyms, though. "Handsome" in its original sense means "inviting to the hand." ^_^

      cf. toothsome: inviting to the tooth, quarrelsome: inviting quarrels, meddlesome: prone to meddle, etc.

    12. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Strangely, English got the female "naive" but not the male "naif." That also makes people look stupid when you know French.

    13. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here.

    14. Re:Née? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Technically French is Latin, or rather a descendant language of the Vulgar Latin spoken on Rome's Gaulish provinces. It adopted some words of Celtic and Germanic origin, but is a Romance language like Spanish, Italian, Romanian, Gallacian and Portuguese. It didn't borrow Latin words, it was Latin, with about 1500 years of linguistic evolution.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    15. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hadn't seen it until a year or two ago. I'm guessing it started getting popular (again?) recently.

    16. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spit on his grave.

    17. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL "poor man"... The guy was a racist faggot. Good riddance.

    18. Re:Née? by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

      Technically French is Latin, or rather a descendant language of the Vulgar Latin spoken on Rome's Gaulish provinces. It adopted some words of Celtic and Germanic origin, but is a Romance language like Spanish, Italian, Romanian, Gallacian and Portuguese. It didn't borrow Latin words, it was Latin, with about 1500 years of linguistic evolution.

      If French is Latin because parts of it were ONCE Latin, then it, (and all other Romance languages, Germanic languages, indeed, most languages spoken in Europe and Asia today,) are Proto-Indo-European, the ancestor language of them all, except perhaps languages of the Natives of Turtle Island, (aka North America) and other extreme isolates.

      Not to get all argumentative, but the idea that a language is identical with, and indistinguishable from its parent language(s) and could, or worse, SHOULD (or even more absurdly, MUST) be called by the same name as its ancestor because it incorporates elements thereof, is specious and makes discussions of etymology impossible, because SOMEONE keeps insisting that all languages are the same, which is silliness. Also, there's more to a language than just vocabulary; construction, syntax, rules, etc., all play a part, and anyone who has ever studied more than one language, especially when the languages aren't extremely closely related, knows that there's a LOT more to learning a different language than learning the vocabulary. How words are assembled to express ideas varries considerably from one language to another. (This is why a verbatim translation is usually linguistically wrong, unless a sentence or fragment is extremely short and simple.)

      Moreover, since languages change over time, a language can be said to descend from any of the earlier versions of the same language even if there has been no major change to the language resulting from influx or infusions due to the people speaking one language being conquered by those who speak another, (which is how all the Arabic that ends up being in modern Spanish got there, resulting in somewhere around 7% of Spanish being Arabic in origin,) due to internal changes over time in usage, vowel or consonant drift, changes in meaning, diversion, conversion, etc., etc., etc., you can't even really call a language the same thing as even a relatively recent version of itself, without anything being added from without. Modern Vernacular English of today has changed enough in even the last couple of centuries that it has at least become a different dialect, and if you compare Modern English, (even proper, rather than vernacular,) with Middle English or Old English, you'll find them completely different languages, even though all have the word "English" in the name. Yes, there's OFTEN commonality, though sometimes that's coincidental due to similar origins of words. For example, the word for mother, mom, or mama has an "m" sound somewhere in it, usually at/near the beginning in very nearly every human language. Hmm... I wonder why?

      I have a sneaking suspicion that you don't know French, or Latin, let alone both, especially if you think they're the same language.

      To linguists, the most basic measure of whether any two people are speaking the same language is whether they are mutually intelligible. Although you might be able to get by speaking one language amidst a group of people who speak only the other, able to communicate basic ideas and requests, such as, "I'm unwell, I need a doctor," or "where is the bathroom?" or "this is delicious, thanks!" when you start getting deep into a conversation and need to use advanced concepts for which simple words fall short, you will likely find the languages have diverged sufficiently for them to be mutually UNINTELLIGIBLE. I'll give you an example. Understanding that machine translation is less reliable the more esoteric, complicated, or sophisticated the ideas you try to encapsulate with words are, I'm going to use Google Translate here, and save you all the trouble.

      The following paragrap

      --
      Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    19. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How dare you say such insulting thing after poor man pass away. You say something nice, positive instead below.

      You must be new here.

    20. Re:Née? by mlyle · · Score: 1

      It's the kind of thing you see in an encyclopedia.

      e.g. from Encyclopedia Britannica

      > Hillary Clinton, in full Hillary Rodham Clinton, née Hillary Diane Rodham, (born October 26, 1947, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.)

      This lets you know what she was originally named.

    21. Re: Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, who knew a schizophrenic man would have socially unacceptable opinions? Better just ignore everything else he accomplished in his life.

    22. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not into racism, you're on the wrong site. Slashdot is racist as fuck.

    23. Re:Née? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      It's like you read the first sentence of my post, but not the rest.

      The point was that unlike, say, English, which did absorb quite a bit of Latin vocabulary via Norman French, French didn't "absorb" Latin syntax and vocabulary, it is a descendant of Latin. It is what Latin came to be in the former Gaulish provinces after about six or seven hundred years of linguistic evolution. That isn't the same as the propensity of Germanic languages to hoover up words.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    24. Re: Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An* OS . . .

    25. Re:Née? by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

      It's like you read the first sentence of my post, but not the rest.

      It's like you read the first sentence of my post, but not the rest. Don't worry about it though.

      We'll just have to agree to disagree and leave it at that.

      --
      Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    26. Re: Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His only accomplishments in life were a) being a racist faggot and b) dying.

    27. Re: Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll fuck you bigger ass to death

    28. Re: Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh and you know, developing his own operating system..

    29. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is an essay

    30. Re: Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was more skilled when he was crazy than you'll ever be !

  2. Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what "os"? And talking to what?

    1. Re:Who? by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Informative

      TempleOS is a fascinating project. It is completely different from everything we currently have, and in some interesting ways.

      Notably, the UI, shell, document format, organization structure, and IDE are all one and the same. Your shell is a text editor where you can embed drawings and link them to other documents, and your documents can be compiled and run with a built-in JIT compiler that also provides its own debug environment.

      It's the opposite paradigm to the Unix "everything is a string" philosophy, and also antithetical to Windows' notion of "everything is a GUI". It's more "everything is connected".

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:Who? by orsayman · · Score: 1

      Well many people already pointed their favourite OS in response to your post but the idea of having the OS and the IDE in the same project is literally one of the catchphrase of Pharo, itself inspired from Smalltalk... From there it links to Xerox and other great ideas.

    3. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds a lot, like what the industry promised for the future (that never really was) around the end of the eighties, when pushing opendoc and ole composition... inspired mostly by smalltalk environments

      The closes implementations i have used after that promise that worked fine where plan9 acme and the (now open source) blackbox component builder http://blackboxframework.org/i...

    4. Re:Who? by istartedi · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a comment I made a long time ago here.. My tongue was firmly in my cheek of course; but there's also a "funny because it's true" angle. It really is fascinating. A man with a pathological mind taking something to its pathological conclusion?

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    5. Re:Who? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Notably, the UI, shell, document format, organization structure, and IDE are all one and the same. Your shell is a text editor where you can embed drawings and link them to other documents, and your documents can be compiled and run with a built-in JIT compiler that also provides its own debug environment.

      So nothing new then?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re: Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything is connected? Sounds like what a schizophrenic would create.

    7. Re:Who? by Wescotte · · Score: 1

      You might get a kick out of this lecture by Bret Victor titled The Future of Programming where he looks back at a lot of early ideas in computing.

    8. Re:Who? by orsayman · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this, it's a very interesting lecture. The future is in the past !

  3. Think of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coding is coitus and compilation is gestation. Your final executable is then ejected. Whether it is alive, stillborn or bad code is a different matter.

  4. RIP Terry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I liked the idea of having a system compiler fast enough to serve as a JIT-scripting engine. We're so used to stupidly slow compilers that this is actually innovative even though Terry's take was far from the first. EG. Turbo Pascal is one earlier example of a compiler fast enough to do that, even though it misses the necessary tooling. Of course this approach has drawbacks. But even if one wouldn't want to use it, there's nothing wrong with looking at the ideas the OS is built upon.

    Otherwise, the guy was completely mad and thereby a useful example to whom one might compare the current target of a good dressing down unfavourably. RIP Terry, for lord knows the guy needed the peace.

    1. Re:RIP Terry by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      I liked the idea of having a system compiler fast enough to serve as a JIT-scripting engine.

      Then you most certainly like Oberon.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re: RIP Terry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe, but don't have the means to prove, that a portion of the mentally ill (and others) suffer from a reaction(with very long term affects and life changing actions that lead to mental illness) from eating dairy, wheat, soy, and especially lecithin found in foods and suppliments( in natural and unnatural forms, ie peanuts vs soy lecithin).

      Its a 30 billion dollar and greater set of industries that benefit from the short term studies that suggest otherwise.

      This could be why the rates of mental illness have increased steadily since the nineteen-twenties.

    3. Re: RIP Terry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I believe, but don't have the means to prove

      Conspiracy theorist detected.

    4. Re: RIP Terry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am certainly not going to get in an argument about conspiracy theories. Fact remains a lot of money is put into promoting the short term benefits of soy products. Look at all those brain enhancing suppliments promoted by Alec Jones that he makes millions off of. The fact is that soy contains precursors to neurotransmitters, that in the short term can "make you smarter" but no real long term studies have been done on the affects of soy, dairy, and wheat. However I would reference two studies, one where patients avoid dairy products and are released from mental hospitals twice as fast as those kept on a normal diet during their stay. Also I would reference the second study that shows a link between celiac disease, and increased risk of schizophrenia. Also I would reference a doctors study of stomach bacteria and its relations to mental illness. Thats my opinion and my prediction.

      Conspiracies aside, my prediction is that in a few years they will make a link between mental illness, abnormal behavior and the products I have listed. As I said it doesn't ill affect a large portion of the population, but I think its importance in this subgroup can't be overstated.

    5. Re: RIP Terry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asia has been consuming soy for centuries. There is no statistical difference in mental illnesses there.

    6. Re: RIP Terry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soy is consumed differently than in Western countries, and also reporting of rates of mental illness is much different in Asian countries. To suggest there is no statistical difference in Asian countries doesn't seem like it can be accurate for these two reasons, but other factors that must give rate differences includes the different sections of China which have totally different diets, its not even close to being uniform. Poor sections have higher rates than affluent sections regardless of whether there is a cause affect of soy being involved. Also, like dairy tolerances/intollereance differences are highly different in Scandinavian countries.

      Also I am pretty sure Asian countries do have a reported higher instances of schizophrenia.
           

    7. Re:RIP Terry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what popped into my head when I read about the OS: Bluebottle, A2, Oberon, etc (I think that was one of Nikolaus Wirth's lesser known affiliations). I always thought A2 was fun.

      I surfed to Terry's OS site quite a few years ago, and wondered about how to interpret what was there. I guess this article gives some insight.

  5. He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to negligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because people stop treating ill people like ill people, as soon as that illness contains some not nice behavior. Even if it clearly is caused by the illness.
    And so they ice him out and stop giving him the help he needs, until he dies.

    Even though that dynamic is understandable, in my book, it is denial of assistance. A crime nearly as great as doing the killing oneself.

    Religious people, from suicide bombers in the middle east to child rapists in the Vatican to the average superstitious schizophrenic like this guy, need treatment! Not even more hate. Hate is what caused their illness to begin with.

    But hey... we're the kind of people who murder murderers, and then act surprised if other people learn form us, that murder is all-right, if you got an excuse the public thinks is valid. Ditto for hate, torture, etc.

    We're still in the deepest depths of the dark ages. At least, until the ravaging religious epidemics are cured (without hurting even a single person), and we can cure and re-integrate even mass-murdering child rapists. Or even ... *gasp* ... prevent them from becoming that way.
    I mean the idea of acting that way, is the fundament of pretty much every religion I know of. For a reason.

  6. TempleOS use? by p4ul13 · · Score: 1

    Iâ(TM)m not anywhere near my laptop so I canâ(TM)t load it into a VM, so for now I just want to ask if any of you have tried loading it up and what your experience was? I see itâ(TM)s only 16MB, so Iâ(TM)m guessing it wasnâ(TM)t all that far along or perhaps talking to god can be done efficiently. Anybody?

    --
    Paul Lenhart writes words!
    1. Re:TempleOS use? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 4, Funny

      IÃ(TM)t won'IÃ(TM)t run on your iGadgeIÃ(TM)t

    2. Re:TempleOS use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      â(TM)t â(TM)tâ(TM)t vâ(TM)tâ(TM)t vâ(TM)tâ(TM)t â(TM)tâ(Tâ(TM)tM)t â(TM)t&â(TM)t

    3. Re:TempleOS use? by LocalH · · Score: 1

      Druaga1 on YouTube made an about it back in May.

      --
      FC Closer
    4. Re:TempleOS use? by LocalH · · Score: 1

      /. fucked my link. Here's the video.

      --
      FC Closer
    5. Re:TempleOS use? by gman003 · · Score: 1

      I've not tried it myself, but this article was a quite interesting look at the OS and its design.

      It's a very minimalist OS, by intent. Like DOS or AmigaOS, everything just runs at ring 0, no memory protection. This would be a security risk, but a) that's the user's fault and b) networking is the work of Satan anyways. Likewise, there's no "users" or "file permissions". There's minimal hardware support - VGA graphics, PC speaker sound, and that's it.

      While it will clearly never amount to anything in itself, it would not be bad if Linux took some ideas from it, and a similar project with more focus on modern hardware might be able to find success.

    6. Re:TempleOS use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God only talks in 16-bit color ASCII text. That's what most people are and will be missing!

    7. Re:TempleOS use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That dude needs a shave and a haircut.

  7. The guy was certainly entertaining. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He admitted to a lot of strange stuff and I wonder whether he was trying to keep the CIA confused or make it so they had nothing to hold over him.

    1. Re:The guy was certainly entertaining. by hey! · · Score: 1

      The thing is, ordinary people are just as crazy. There's just more of them.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:The guy was certainly entertaining. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have an uncle (by marriage) that is clinically schizophrenic. He's similar in his rantings, thinks the government is controlling him, voices talking to him and telling him to what do, etc.

      The thing is, he knows he's nuts, and he makes fun of himself for it. It's pretty amusing to be around him when he starts going on about aliens and government mind control, while also creepy as he talks about the voices controlling him, and then laughs his ass off when he realizes how nuts he sounds.

      He doesn't take medication, but he smokes plenty of pot, and seems to have his condition more-or-less under control.

    3. Re:The guy was certainly entertaining. by dddux · · Score: 1

      That's what I think, too. All people are crazy in some way, just more or less crazy. OTOH, what is normal? How does one define what's normal? Normal was different 10000 years ago, 2000 years ago, 100 years ago, or 20 years ago. I said 20 years ago on purpose, because at the time having a mobile phone wasn't regarded as not normal. I don't use a mobile phone, so I'm regarded as being not normal these days. I'm not claiming I am normal, though. :)

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  8. Outsider Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Never Hurd of this operating system, but it could open Windows to the mind of this individual who has made himself like the Unix of yore working practically NonStop on this GEM.

    1. Re:Outsider Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Never Hurd of this operating system, but it could open Windows to the mind of this individual who has made himself like the Unix of yore working practically NonStop on this GEM.

      Alas, his operating system wasn't anyone's Pick.

  9. Re:oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is just looking for a new way to talk to his imaginary god

  10. An interesting experiment by lucasnate1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I remember correctly, his OS was written completely from scratch and had a few interesting ideas:

    1) All code is compiled JIT, this means that C looks just like a scripting language and you can always break into a debugger.
    2) He made his own dialect of C called HolyC, which was a version of C with small fixes to make it more low-level and accurate.
    3) If I remember correctly symbol tables were global, so that processes could access each other's variables by names, thus allowing libraries to simply work by changing global variables.

    I am sure that somewhere, in his code, there's something to learn from.

    1. Re: An interesting experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, he never learned the debugging value of going fully reentrant. Also never forked code with global variable name collisions..

    2. Re:An interesting experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      3) If I remember correctly symbol tables were global, so that processes could access each other's variables by names, thus allowing libraries to simply work by changing global variables.

      I am sure that somewhere, in his code, there's something to learn from.

      If #3 is accurate, maybe how NOT to write code. This is a terrible, terrible idea.

    3. Re:An interesting experiment by dcollins · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "If I remember correctly symbol tables were global, so that processes could access each other's variables by names, thus allowing libraries to simply work by changing global variables."

      This is a surprisingly poignant statement on how crazy people really want global entities to exist.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    4. Re:An interesting experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First thing to learn would be that having variables inside other code be directly accessible means you'd have to duplicate (bugs and all) any validation routines involving those values everywhere you want to access them from, unless you just wing it and hope everything is kosher.

    5. Re:An interesting experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely something to learn from. I am actually humbled at what he accomplished on his own. May he rest in peace.

    6. Re:An interesting experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, a nut, but not a stupid one... or an ignorant one.

      A real oddity. It's a shame. He wasn't hurting anyone else... just coding.

    7. Re:An interesting experiment by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Perhaps the Von Neumann architecture is how it is because it's modeled somewhat after how we think--external storage (books, paper, and now computers) I/O (eyes, ears, mouth) and memory are distinct systems. So when a schizophrenic sets about the task of creating a system, maybe he models it after his own brain or world view. Maybe part of being "crazy" is that parts of the brain access eachother in unconventional ways. Sometimes it's for the better (creative) but often for the worse (paranoid, hallucinating, delusional).

      Now I'm wondering how an alien race might build a computer. Maybe there's a universality to intelligence that pushes them towards Von Neumann. Maybe not.

      In the physical world, witness the arguments about how the metric system is "so much better", but isn't decimal really just a bias that goes all the way back to us counting on our fingers? I hope I live to see the day that octal aliens arrive.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  11. It's so beautiful, it brought tears to my eyes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not the visuals of the UI. But the elegance of the system, and the love that has gone into it.
    Besides, with our bling obsessed software ecosystem, we could give it a bling-you-to-death UI in a few days, if we wanted. (And a few more, to make the GUI not cripple the power of what was there before.)

    I never heard of it, or him, but now it will definitely be an inspiration for my own OS project. Minus the religious aka schizophrenic part. Plus the passion part.

  12. doesnt seem that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if he wouldnt had gone and said God made him do it, OS would had more credit, some cool innovated stuff was included.

    1. Re:doesnt seem that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      640x480 16 colors made it easier for him "not an artist" to make offerings to God. If you have a Judeo Christian background The Ark of The Covenant and Temples had dimensions specified in the bible. Terry tried to give offerings to God and receive message from him through random number generators.

  13. Religion is not the root of all evil by lucasnate1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While there are many problems with religion, I wonder if modern secularism really offers anything better. Sure, these idiots believe in god, but we believe in 60 genders and in infinite growth. They burn innocent women and rape children, but we cause global warming that will kill much more people in the end, not to mention all the shit we enabled in africa and china just to get cheaper products. They repsect community and friendships, while we... sit alone behind our screen, drenching ourselves in consumerism and pills, trying to forget.

    Are you sure that the secular west managed to do something better? Hell, even Newton and Einstein were partially religious, and not rabid hateful atheists.

    1. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every single one of your dichotomies is plainly false. E.g. you can not place religion on one side and secular global warming creators on the other.

    2. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even Newton and Einstein were partially religious

      Newton was rabidly theistic, if not entirely orthodox. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_newton#Religious_views

    3. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Sure, these idiots believe in god

      Oh look, an ignorant and arrogant Atheist unable to respect another Theist's beliefs and truths. So much for modern secularism offering anything better...

      > Hell, even Newton and Einstein were partially religious

      Newton _also_ wrote *more* about Alchemy then Physics. Funny how _that_ gets overlooked.

      So its OK to be crazy as long as you produce OTHER stuff that works? =P

    4. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While there are many problems with religion, I wonder if modern secularism really offers anything better

      It offers a lack of religion, which is surely better.

      Unless you prefer that we all live our lives believing in fantasies.

      Or worse, you prefer it were like the dark ages where we're all required to pretend that we also believe in your fantasies.

    5. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that the secular west managed to do something better? Hell, even Newton and Einstein were partially religious, and not rabid hateful atheists.

      I would argue that it has on the whole done better, but that doesn't mean it will be perfect. I suspect that in another few years, the current idiocy surrounding 60 genders will largely die off. Meanwhile religions will continue to believe as they have for centuries or millennia because if you start to pull at the threads of the central tenants of the faith, the whole thing will unravel.

      I also think there's a difference between secularism and the rabid atheists that were as hateful of religious folks as religious folks were of atheists. These seem to be largely the group that moved on to Atheism+ which has swallowed the social justice dogma and act much like the religions that they so despised. I think there was a mistaken belief that secularism would cure people of the type of thinking that leads people to religion. However, I think that this is backwards and that it's that people's way of thinking leads to create and join religions.

      Removing the old religions does nothing to stop religious thinking. It simply means that there's a vacuum to be filled with new religions. Maybe these are more secular in nature, but they have many of the same hallmarks of contemporary religions. Thirty years ago the moral busy bodies of the western world were avid church goers, but reducing the number of church goers did nothing to the number of moral busy bodies. They merely found new homes in the various social justice movements where their holier than thou art attitude fits in just as well as it did in many religious denominations.

      Looking back across human history, it took ages for us to get to this point. It's incredibly presumptuous to assume that the secular west somehow has a silver bullet solution to every problem it confronts and that it will resolve all of them sometime shortly after breakfast. However, I would bet that it has the best chance at pushing humanity forward and that the best qualities of the secular west are being embraced around the world and helping humanity move forward.

    6. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by lucasnate1 · · Score: 2

      Capitalism, freedom, individualism, genderism, social justice, all as much as fantasies as religion, their temples celebrated and funded by secular people.

    7. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by lucasnate1 · · Score: 2

      So its OK to be crazy as long as you produce OTHER stuff that works? =P

      As long one can easily isolate the crazy from the non-crazy and use the non-crazy to better society, and as long as the crazy doesn't violently hurt one, yes. Hell, even if the crazy contributes nothing, but does not hurt anyone, it is ok to be crazy.

    8. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you see that story yesterday over on "the orange site" about some homeless dev in flyover country? He said he was too militant of an atheist to go to a church based charity. I'm like did this dude every consider that his hatred of people's religions might be part of the reason he can't land or hold on to a job? The problem is STEM people hate humanities so they never spend any time studying religious traditions or their role in civilization beyond "zomg some guy burned a which 400 years ago!". Grow up, get some social skills. And hating people for their religion is never good, even if that religion is Christianity.

    9. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by Prien715 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Many atheists cannot tell the difference between the fiction bin and the rubbish bin.

      Admiring and emulating the fidelity of the Three Musketeers, the deduction ability of Sherlock Holmes or any character other fictional character is the same as how one should read the wisdom of Solomon or the compassion of Jesus. Much better than say, admiring a character from an Ayn Rand novel who are amazing at justifying to themselves and their reader about being an douchbag.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    10. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      Isn't what you are making a typical "no true scotsman" argument? Just as you can select intelligent atheists, I can select intelligent religious people.

    11. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oscar Levant — 'There's a fine line between genius and insanity. I have erased this line.'

      captcha:nuance

    12. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They burn innocent women and rape children

      No, "we" don't. When you can overcome your remarkably topical mental illness of absurd generalization fallacies, let's talk.

      Or maybe have a laugh, when you complain about Trump's (never actually said) statement that "Mexicans are rapists", and fail to see the pathetic irony.

    13. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Uh no. It's the religious who are fucking up the planet. Dominion, remember? The Republicans who keep jerking off big oil and the like are always telling us how they're motivated by their religion. They are the ones who believe in infinite growth. They're also the ones who raped Africa in the name of saving it with Jesus. You have it ass-backwards.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      Regarding the conquering of Africa, you are correct, Christianity has a major part in this. Regarding our ecological problems, I think that capitalism (or maybe, if you insist on religion, Protestantism) is more responsible than religion in general. Don't get me wrong, religion has plenty of problems, but I honestly don't think that it it just disappeared things would be better. I guess what I'm wondering is: what will replace it? Would you really prefer a world where SJW/alt-right wars are the new crusades?

    15. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, religion has plenty of problems, but I honestly don't think that it it just disappeared things would be better.

      There aren't enough people who love capitalism to support conservative parties, they have to fall back on people who love Jesus (or whatever.) They would die off (and thus stop supporting capitalism) without religious people to manipulate.

      I guess what I'm wondering is: what will replace it? Would you really prefer a world where SJW/alt-right wars are the new crusades?

      I'd prefer a world where the alt-right are educated in racial issues, but we can't have everything we want. SJWs are often annoying, but since their focus is on letting people do what they want with themselves, I'm pretty much on their side.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He died because the glow in the dark CIA naggers got to him.

  15. It was suicide by lucasnate1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to wikipedia:

    On the evening of 11th of August 2018, Terry was walking alongside some railroad tracks in the city of The Dalles, when he was accidentally struck by a Union Pacific train coming from behind.

    1. Re:It was suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That says he was hit by a train, not that it was suicide.

    2. Re:It was suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He must have been blasting Christian rock on his headphones.

    3. Re:It was suicide by slickwillie · · Score: 1

      Clearly God smited him for that uninitialized pointer.

    4. Re:It was suicide by Megol · · Score: 1

      Accident != suicide

    5. Re:It was suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if God just took him to heaven after he completed his task?

    6. Re:It was suicide by inking · · Score: 1

      People get hit by trains all the time while taking pictures or doing other mundane stuff. One naturally expects to hear a train arrive and thinks that one would have time aplenty to move out of the way, but they are surprisingly quiet. It’s ridiculously easy to get unintentionally killed by one. Seems that Davis joined that lengthy list—unless it was, of course, payback by the CIA for running over one of their fluorescent operatives of African heritage.

    7. Re: It was suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but that happens a lot around here. People just don't realize how fast the train is moving or how close it is.

    8. Re:It was suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to a police report on the death, on the evening of Aug. 11, Davis was walking along the railroad tracks, with his back to an oncoming train, when he turned and faced the train before it hit him. The train engineer considered it a suicide, according to the report.

  16. Give it a hundred years and Tem will be a religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The schizophrenia part will disappear and the mere associations with a god will persist.

  17. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did check on wikipedia, and they say he maximum sentence is "21 years (can be extended indefinitely if the criminal poses a danger to society at the end of served time); 30 years for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity" which isn't too different than some countries with a nominal life sentence.
    Very close to France which has "life but you can get out in 22 years" and "life but you can get out in 30 years" just the 'paroling' decision is flipped around : show the man is dangerous vs show the man is not dangerous.

  18. Excuse me, but I know, and am way further. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At one point on the path of understanding schizophrenia, one reaches reach your current view. I was there too. I also thought I knew it very well, and that it "simply" was not understandable or predictable.
    But it's one of those things, where if you think even further (*much further*), you end up very close to this apparently simplistic view again.
    The fact that it is hard to predict and non-obvious to you, should tell you that you are far from having understood it. Doesn't mean others haven't.
    I have gone so far, I know schizophrenia better than even current research. Actually, I know how to cure schizophrenia. The reason we don't, is that under normal circumstances (as in: without safe plasticity-altering drugs), it takes forever, and you basically need to use up somebody else's life to save this one. You just can't create neural input, strong enough, to overcome the weakness of the connections to those encapsulations.
    Trust me, I tried. My mom was schizophrenic.

    So don't worry. I not only know what you say, but am far past it.
    I understand how it can look clueless to a clueless person that thinks she has a bit of a clue. (Just enough to bully others with snobism.)
    Especially with me simplifying things to suit the average reader here.

    Various form of crime and mental illness still exist in countries that have no death penalty.

    Yes. And? There are still many things that we treat wrongly, to cause such people to exist. And we even still hate them. Isn't it convenient, to ignore everything else that I said to make the argument complete, and then pick on your straw man?

    1. Re: Excuse me, but I know, and am way further. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think you can treat it, you will consume your life and most of the time you will just delay the progression and become entangled in their world and suffer yourself.

      If the âpatientâ(TM) is on a path to a tragedy, he will get there
      Trust me I know.

  19. He will be missed by UWM · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We used to prank call Terry Davis sometimes, he used to have some good insights and he could carry on a conversation for a while until he would suddenly "switch gears" and hang up the phone. One time, we even had him and Richard Stallman speak to eachother for a moment.

    And he thought Linus Torvalds was a noob because he never wrote his own compiler.

    1. Re:He will be missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how long ago was this? I sort of wondered awhile ago if I ever heard him on a conference call. I'm anonymous, but I'll read anything you reply.

  20. Since when is a proper keyboard layout an iGadget? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NEO layout is Germany's Dvorak, but much better, and much more powerful.

    Doesn't mean everyone who's not using ASCII like an American (and ONLY an American) from the 80s is an iTard.

    Why you would defend a site, whose operators are so debilitatingly incompetent, that they can't even implement UTF-8 with a code block / code point whitelist, like every sane person since the early 2000s, is a riddle to me.

  21. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

    Do you know the cause of death because I'm not seeing it. For all we know, he died of a heart attack

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  22. Nigger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure he would appreciate this comment - he truly hated n1ggers!

    1. Re:Nigger! by Tsolias · · Score: 1

      He was a simple man.

    2. Re:Nigger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all, only CIA ones.

  23. Sad news by butzwonker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I followed him from time to time. Some of his rants during his schizophrenic periods were weird, to say the least. Then again, not many people develop a programming language on their own and then use it to program a complete graphical operating system that runs on bare metal with it. It's sad that his schizophrenia wasn't treated earlier and more effectively.

    1. Re:Sad news by AlanObject · · Score: 1

      Even the most chaotic mind seeks out stability and order. In this case it would appear that the afflicted person had enough skill and/or talent to express that urge in the form of software. Based on his own statements in the article that was indeed its purpose.

  24. Re:cia naggers by Tsolias · · Score: 1

    They glow in the Dark

    F

  25. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Tsolias · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At the time terry was wondering around in 'murica, 'murica didn't have time to take care of Terries, they focused on dreamers, blacks, feminists, gays and hilary.

    A guy has thousands of people documenting his condition, reporting in where he is(which he did also by himself), and so on... yet the public services never gave a shit.

    when did 'murica stopped caring about Americans?

  26. There is SO much wrong with your comment, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Religion is schizophrenia. It is not about "believing in God". It is about ignoring outside reality, in favor of a comforting inner delusion. E.g. because reality is unbearable. "God" is merely one example of an alter ego of such people. They aren't idiots because of that. My mom wasn't an idiot. She was a genius. Discovered helicobacter pylory and its effects on babies, a decade before somebody got the Nobel prize for it. ... They are just ill. Gravely ill. ... She was ill. And she was laughed out by the professors because of this. Despite her hypothesis being shown to be correct later. ... She just needed the delusion, to handle certain youth traumata that go back several generations, all the way to World War 1. ... Because we are still too incompetent to fix this illness.

    2. What does secularity have to do with p.c. SJWs? Did you realize, you said "BELIEVE" when talking about those ridiculous "60 genders" and "infinite growth"? The whole damn point of sanity (that't the word for what you call atheism, if you need one), is that you don't believe. Period. You observe, you notice patterns, you conclude, and you act on that. That does not even oppose the concept of a "God". It just highlights that there is no use in assuming the existence of something, that you literally can't tell exists.
    Not do "we" cause global warming and religious people somehow don't.
    So take your straw man and typical American false dichotomy of "us vs them", and shove them up your lower back mouth.

    The assholes you are talking about, who ruin the planet and harm people, are profit psychopaths by the way. That's a different illness, and mostly the result of overpopulation giving a natural advantage to psychopaths. (I haven't found out why people believe that profit and growth for the sake of profit and growth are good things though.)

    Also, ... mass-murdering hateful suicide-bombing child-raping discriminating religious people who hate everything foreign or not obeying their schizophrenia "respect community and friendships" too? And again, you seem to confuse "we" with your psychopathic dog-eat-dog society of assholes that is the cornerstone of "the economy".

    I'm sorry that you are alone, and have to drench yourself in consumerism and pills, because you feel forced to reject community and friendships and being an asshole to others. I really do.
    Most of the world is not like this. "Our" western culture only is. (Which includes the east-Asian and third world countries that we infected with it.)
    Just take all your money of your next salary, don't pay any bills, buy a plane ticket, and move out. To a culture that never was influenced by western culture.
    You will be much happier.

    Newton and Einstein weren't religious. They were grown into a culture of oppressive religious conditioning. They acted and said what was expected of them at the time, so they wouldn't get harassed and hated and maybe even murdered by Catholibans / people like you.

    1. Re:There is SO much wrong with your comment, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe in Spinoza's God, Who reveals Himself in the lawful harmony of the world, not in a God Who concerns Himself with the fate and the doings of mankind."

      "The idea of a personal God is quite alien to me and seems even naïve."

      "It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."

        – Albert Einstein

    2. Re:There is SO much wrong with your comment, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Religion is schizophrenia. It is not about "believing in God". It is about ignoring outside reality, in favor of a comforting inner delusion.

      And you know this, how? You're making an assertion entirely unbacked by evidence. Perhaps you are mentally ill? Particularly given there is no possible way you can know to what degree the thoughts of -everyone else- are or are not verified by their life's experience, and you are essentially claiming psychic powers in a manner utterly unsupportable by any rational epistemology. Quite literally. Delusion, indeed.

  27. Because trains are oh-so sneaky! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you even think before you write?

    Please take your Asperger's pills. And buy yourself some common sense. Yours seems to be completely gone.

    1. Re:Because trains are oh-so sneaky! by inking · · Score: 1

      He isn’t; you are just entirely clueless. Trains are sneaky. https://www.popularmechanics.c...

  28. Re:Since when is a proper keyboard layout an iGadg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NEO layout is Germany's Dvorak, but much better, and much more powerful.

    Doesn't mean everyone who's not using ASCII like an American (and ONLY an American) from the 80s is an iTard.

    Why you would defend a site, whose operators are so debilitatingly incompetent, that they can't even implement UTF-8 with a code block / code point whitelist, like every sane person since the early 2000s, is a riddle to me.

    Found the German iTard.

  29. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to negligence

    How do you know what he died of?

    According to Wikipedia, he hit by a train in an accident.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  30. Rest In Peace, Terry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rest In Peace, Terry.

  31. We know! It's right there in TFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  32. Still a better OS than Windows 10! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That OS seems to be dedicated to Satan...

  33. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From local news reports he was walking on rail tracks and got struck by train coming up behind him.

  34. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by retchdog · · Score: 1

    iirc, mental health centers were cut back significantly under Reagan and no one's bothered to do much about it since then. that's one possible answer, though i'd say that a more accurate answer would be that we never really did.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  35. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by retchdog · · Score: 1

    to elaborate slightly, i don't know how great those mental health centers were on average even when they did exist. there have certainly been horror stories; i just don't know whether they are representative. it's quite possible that they were just places to send humans to rot like garbage out of sight, and we decided not to waste the money on that since they could rot on the street just as well. i don't know.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  36. Cool story bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see a lot of claims of knowledge, even a claim that it's all simple, but no actual explanation.

    As to my experience, that's second hand with several (late and living) family members in appropriate medical professions, and I'm quite sure there's no hate in the business. Occasional exasperation or annoyance maybe, but no hate.

  37. Religion is literal root of all evil by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Religion is not the root of all evil

    Sure it is. Before religion, was there even a concept of 'evil'? I bet you that religion was what invented the concept of evil when creation myths were being concocted ten thousand years ago.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Religion is literal root of all evil by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      When people lived in tribes or whatever, didn't they have rules? Can't you say that these rules defined good and evil?

    2. Re:Religion is literal root of all evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before religion, was there even a concept of 'evil'?

      Sure. You can have a non-religious code of ethics, and then evil can be defined as something absolutely unethical.

    3. Re:Religion is literal root of all evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read "Genealogy of Morality" by Nietzsche. He talks about this at length. The pre-Christian ruling class in the ancient world had "good" and "bad". It was the slaves whose morality had "good" and "evil". Then Christianity, a religion with what Nietzsche called "slave morality", took over and became dominant in Rome. Now the ruling class ironically has slave morality instead of master morality. Christianity inverted the values of classical Europe. For all the angsty STEM atheists you see in tech bashing Christianity, few take the time to really develop a sophisticated critique beyond "lol it's fake!". Religion is a social construct; it's as real as people want it to be. To really critique religion you have to engage with it more seriously.

    4. Re:Religion is literal root of all evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could say that, but I do think that a separate judgement is needed to go from rule breaker to evil or rule follower to good.

    5. Re:Religion is literal root of all evil by scottrocket · · Score: 1

      When people lived in tribes or whatever, didn't they have rules? Can't you say that these rules defined good and evil?

      I think I see the parent's point: Tribes developed rules about things that were desirable, or undesirable (constructive v. destructive). The polarized concepts of "Good" and "Evil" may well have been purely non-secular in origin i.e., religious, spiritual, or generally non-entity supernatural. Ultimately - short of building a time machine - the answer may always be a guessing game.

  38. C64 by kackle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Notably, the UI, shell, document format, organization structure, and IDE are all one and the same. Your shell is a text editor where you can embed drawings and link them to other documents, and your documents can be compiled and run with a built-in JIT compiler that also provides its own debug environment.

    This, not surprisingly, sounds Commodore 64-ish. For the younger folks, if you turn on a Commodore 64, within 3 seconds you have an OS prompt. From that prompt, you can interact with the OS via commands, including directly viewing/editing contents of registers and memory. You can interact with disk drives, or any other hardware connected to the machine, for that matter. And you can load and execute (and even edit certain) applications. Or, you can just start typing/adding BASIC language lines to the built-in BASIC interpreter. It's not a bad paradigm to mimic, really.

    1. Re:C64 by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that BASIC itself is the system shell, so when you type the "LOAD" and "RUN" commands, you're actually writing a BASIC program that loads new code and overwrites itself. When you load the main index table from a floppy disk, you're actually loading a BASIC program disguised as a directory listing, hence, you use the "LIST" command to show it. Things were interesting in the days of no caches and no memory protection.

      Personally, though, this weirdness is why I hated my C64, and didn't really get into computing and programming until I got an Amiga 1000.

  39. Re:cia naggers by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    He's running over glow in the darks forever now. He hit them with his car, they hit him with a train.

  40. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by q_e_t · · Score: 1

    Schizophrenia is unlikely to be even one disease, and may be a set of common or overlapping symptoms for something like seven separate illnesses. Debate and research continues.

  41. First Mac Miller, and now this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assassinated by CIAN*ggers!

  42. money is a hugely underestimated cure for ills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Schizophrenia is unlikely to be even one disease, and may be a set of common or overlapping symptoms for something like seven separate illnesses. Debate and research continues.

    A good point to reiterate- many such things are actually categorizations/classifications based on observation. Almost everybody goes through periods of time when they are very excited and/or excited for relatively long duration, as well as very sad and/or sad for relatively long duration. If in the context of their lives, they achieve general kinds of success/functioning, then they are classified as 'normal'. If in the context of their lives, they struggle and find themselves overly stressed for prolonged periods of time, they are considered "bipolar". While no doubt there are a significant fraction of those cases that are caused by underlying biology, I suspect that the vast majority of those cases would disappear if those people woke up and won the lottery (and thus removed the lion's share of stress from their lives). I find it interesting to call something a disease that can be cured by winning the lottery. But it's the way of our world.

    I also tend to suspect that it's pretty easy for people who have won the lottery, to use legal means most can't afford to induce bipolar/schizophrenia in their political enemies. But I guess most psychiatrists would assert that such a suspicion is enough justification to write a scrip for antipsychotics. Slavery used to be legal and widespread. Odds are a hundred years from now psychiatrists will be much better at their jobs.

  43. Damn shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is exactly the type of personality that is a perfect fit for one of the *BSD teams.

  44. Re: It's so beautiful, it brought tears to my eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason that he wrote an OS from scratch and you never will is because he was inspired by the God you don't believe in.

  45. To anyone considering donating to NAMI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article provides some links to places suggested to donate to, to ease the pain of mental illness. I would just like to share a short story.


    I attended a public NAMI support group a while ago. Part of the group were these handouts that would explain various mental illnesses. Eventually one of the hand-outs attempted to explain shizophrenia. I shit you not; in this hand out, schizophrenia was described as a physical attack on the brain. They showed pictures of, 'healthy brains', and then of, 'schizophrenic' brains. The schizophrenic brains were smaller. This literal shrinkage of the brain was described as a symptom of schizophrenia's physical effects on the brain.


    I remember upon reading this, I thought to myself, "bulllllll... shit". I thought to myself, the brains of these schizophrenics aren't shrinking because of the disease, they are shrinking because of the anti-psychotics they are being, "medicated with".


    Fast forward about 5 years later, and I came across a study proving to at least some degree my, hunch, at this, "NAMI", meeting. Schizophrenia is not a disease that manifests itself physically by literally shrinking the brain (brain atrophy); it is a description of an observation on human behavior and the medication often prescribed to treat it, is really nothing more than a tranquilizer that after long enough repeated use causes brain atrophy. It's my belief that because these, 'anti-psychotics', essentially stop a lot of synaptic firing, that some neurons, after being drugged up for so long, just stop functioning and die off, or perhaps, that if prescribed at young enough ages, stops later adult brain development.


    Anyway, theorizing aside. My point is that NAMI was (and probably still is along with many NPs and Psychiatrists) in the dark at least on this subject, and probably is on many others. I can not describe the level of frustration I felt being taught that schizophrenia is shrinking the brains of it's sufferers, when in fact, it is the, 'medication', they are being given that is doing the physical damage.


    So my real point is that if you want to donate money to causes aimed at helping to alleviate suffering from mental-illness, i would not suggest sending money to NAMI. Do I think NAMI is evil? No. I think they are grossly ignorant and misguided along with many people in the mental health system from Psychiatrists all the way down to patients. I think people begin to identify more with their diagnosis, than who they actually are as a person, as a personality. And likewise can be objectified as a described set of behavioral patterns, rather than a person. I think the mental-health system claims to want help these people by having others see them, 'differently'. From one perspective, this is an attempt at trying to breed compassion from those who would other wise most likely just be viewed as, 'difficult people'. The problem is, most people in the mental health system also view people as, 'difficult'. To people inside and outside the mental health system you become some one who is, having a manic episode, depressed, anxious, delusional, hullucinatory, etc.. etc..


    I'm not preaching full blow anti-psychiatry here, so much as I'm trying to say that the mental health field, as i've often seen it and experienced it is, very often much like one of those cartoons where one character is digging a hole and throwing the dirt in back of him, while some one behind him is digging their own hole and throwing their dirt over their back. Each person is sort of stuck, never getting anywhere, because they keep filling up each other's hole.


    Everybody becomes a fucking doctor and normal human interaction becomes, instead, this sociopathic behavioral observer. There are people in the field, who are sort of hip to the jive, and are trying to help; but, it's sort of like if you are working for a logging company, trying to plant a few trees as you cut down large oaks.

    1. Re:To anyone considering donating to NAMI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  46. Who?-LISP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TempleOS is a fascinating project. It is completely different from everything we currently have, and in some interesting ways.

    Notably, the UI, shell, document format, organization structure, and IDE are all one and the same. Your shell is a text editor where you can embed drawings and link them to other documents, and your documents can be compiled and run with a built-in JIT compiler that also provides its own debug environment.

    It's the opposite paradigm to the Unix "everything is a string" philosophy, and also antithetical to Windows' notion of "everything is a GUI". It's more "everything is connected".

    Oh you mean like Genera?

  47. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the others you name are fully in board for better health services.

    It is the social Darwinist conservatives who donâ(TM)t want the mentally ill to get too comfortable.

  48. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hit by a train usually means suicide by standing in front of a train.

  49. I've always said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a fine line between genius and insanity.

  50. What about Kanye? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently Kanye West believes his schizophrenia is what causes him to be creative. If you cure it, do you also neuter the creative drive?

  51. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How did this bigoted shit get marked as insightful?

    Mental health services were cut back in the 80s and everyone suffered. Minorities with mental health issues got screwed just as much as white people with mental health issues.

  52. I tried his OS by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    I ran a copy up in a virtual machine and it worked without an issue. I went through some of the programs and tried to get used to the cli it uses IIRC. One of my colleagues gave it a go as well a few weeks ago.

    I might go back and look at it again, you never know what jewels lie in there from such dedicated creation.

    R.I.P Terry, thank you for something interesting.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  53. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Negative. The ACLU sued to have the asylums shut down on the basis that incarcerating people who committed no crime was immoral. They won. Reagan closed the doors on the now-empty facilities. And somehow got the blame for setting people free who were innocent. As long as they could lift spoon to mouth to feed themselves, they were good to go according to the ACLU.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  54. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Tsolias · · Score: 1

    One guy carries generations of taxes on his back, can't have even the basic health care for his condition and is treated like a criminal,
    vs some random person jumping from country to country and ending up in the one that offers him the best conditions.
    Terry didn't do country-shopping. He stayed home, yet he lived like an exiled.

    If you want to call it bigotry, call it that way, if you want to call me racist, please do... I am.
    This doesn't negate the fact that nobody fucking cared about terry, because terry didn't align with the mentality the media and the leftists try to create. That's why he was living in a van and later on in the streets, he had his benefits denied and lived off of donations mainly from people who visited reddit and /g/ and /pol/.
    Your fellow citizen dies like a dog in the streets and your are taking care of leeches.

  55. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Reagan closed them instead of reforming them because the goal was to abandon the insane for monetary reasons, and certainly not for the purpose of helping anyone but the wealthy.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  56. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If someone that you loved has ever succumbed to a mental illness, you would realize how incredibly difficult it can be to get them help.
    1 - They don't think they are ill & they refuse treatment
    2 - if they are not an immediate threat to themselves or to others, goto line 1

  57. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

    yet the public services never gave a shit.

    The summary stated that he was living on disability, which I'm assuming is funded from Social Security.

    --
    If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
  58. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Courts have established that you can't just lock someone away in a mental institution against their will. Legally, one can only be institutionalized if they are reasonably considered an immediate threat to themselves or others. This precedent is established because the cops have abused the mental health system to lock away dissidents, troublemakers, and etc. who were really not ill.

    All major cities have mental health services available. If he wanted to check in he could have.

  59. Next! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...

  60. Some parallells... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Terry Devis can be called Henry Darger of programming - iconic outsider person who devoted big part of his life to creating something big, but still naive, creation.

  61. Amazing achievement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing achievement, some people chose to be a alcoholic a druggy or all manor of other vises, noone chooses to be schizophrenic. Given the hand he was dealt, I think it is outstanding what he has achieved.

  62. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm thinking he hit a small animal cat rabbit raccoon with glowing eyes (light reflection).

  63. Re:Since when is a proper keyboard layout an iGadg by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    If I could vote, I'd say we should strip off the eighth bit on all char data posted to the site.\

  64. Re:Since when is a proper keyboard layout an iGadg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever, gramps.

  65. Re: He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "dreamers, blacks, feminists, gays" are all groups of people in America. Addressing discrimination against multiple groups does not require ignoring the needs of other groups. On the contrary; improving equality for marginalized groups will make more resources available to help everyone, including people like Terry.

  66. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by retchdog · · Score: 1

    interesting. since this is a political topic, i'll have to ask for references.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  67. Re:Since when is a proper keyboard layout an iGadg by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    Your mom's potting shed has to be kinda cramped, you punk.