Slashdot Mirror


Creator of TempleOS, Terry Davis, Has Passed Away (osnews.com)

OSNews reports: Terrence Andrew Davis, sole creator and developer of TempleOS (née LoseThos), has passed away at age 48. Davis suffered from mental illness -- schizophrenia -- which had a severe impact on his life. He claimed he created his operating system after having spoken with and receiving instructions from god, and he was a controversial figure, also here on OSNews, for his incomprehensible rants and abrasive style towards OSNews readers and staff. We eventually had to ban him, but our then-editor Kroc Kamen worked with him in 2010 to publish an article about his operating system despite his ban.... I hope he found peace -- wherever he may be.
Davis spent 10 years building "an operating system to talk to God," according to a 2014 profile in Motherboard, which described its welcome screen as "a riot of 16-color, scrolling, blinking text" resembling early DOS-based GUIs. (Wikipedia describes its interface as "a mixture of DOS and Turbo C.") To build his operating system, Terry wrote 121,176 lines of code.

An anonymous reader writes: Davis learned assembly language on a Commodore 64 before he'd graduated from high school. He eventually got a master's degree in electrical engineering from Arizona State University, and as an undergrad he worked briefly at Ticketmaster, programming operating systems. His later life included time in mental hospitals and some homelessness, as well as living at home with his parents after his schizophrenia was diagnosed and treated.

In 2014 Motherboard pieced together his lifestyle from emailed updates Terry sent from his Ubuntu desktop. They concluded he was living on disability, and spent most of his time coding, surfing the web, "or using the output from the National Institute of Standards and Technology randomness beacon to talk to God -- he posts the results on his webpage as 'Terry Davis' Rants.'" Their article describes him as "God's lonely programmer," saying Davis "offered the world a temple to a God who speaks only to him, and is still waiting for everyone else to listen."

Terry's death was confirmed by a local Oregon newspaper, and the official web site for TempleOS now also includes this death notice:

In the wake of Terry A. Davis' passing his family has requested supporters of his donate to "organizations working to ease the pain and suffering caused by mental illness" such as

74 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Née? by fibonacci8 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's French for "born", and specifically the female form. Why would you write that? That's to indicate the maiden name of a person, or more rarely when a pseudonym is used.... I don't think a OS is birthed.

    Don't anthropomorphize computers, they hate it when you do that.

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
  2. He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to negligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because people stop treating ill people like ill people, as soon as that illness contains some not nice behavior. Even if it clearly is caused by the illness.
    And so they ice him out and stop giving him the help he needs, until he dies.

    Even though that dynamic is understandable, in my book, it is denial of assistance. A crime nearly as great as doing the killing oneself.

    Religious people, from suicide bombers in the middle east to child rapists in the Vatican to the average superstitious schizophrenic like this guy, need treatment! Not even more hate. Hate is what caused their illness to begin with.

    But hey... we're the kind of people who murder murderers, and then act surprised if other people learn form us, that murder is all-right, if you got an excuse the public thinks is valid. Ditto for hate, torture, etc.

    We're still in the deepest depths of the dark ages. At least, until the ravaging religious epidemics are cured (without hurting even a single person), and we can cure and re-integrate even mass-murdering child rapists. Or even ... *gasp* ... prevent them from becoming that way.
    I mean the idea of acting that way, is the fundament of pretty much every religion I know of. For a reason.

  3. TempleOS use? by p4ul13 · · Score: 1

    Iâ(TM)m not anywhere near my laptop so I canâ(TM)t load it into a VM, so for now I just want to ask if any of you have tried loading it up and what your experience was? I see itâ(TM)s only 16MB, so Iâ(TM)m guessing it wasnâ(TM)t all that far along or perhaps talking to god can be done efficiently. Anybody?

    --
    Paul Lenhart writes words!
    1. Re:TempleOS use? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 4, Funny

      IÃ(TM)t won'IÃ(TM)t run on your iGadgeIÃ(TM)t

    2. Re:TempleOS use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      â(TM)t â(TM)tâ(TM)t vâ(TM)tâ(TM)t vâ(TM)tâ(TM)t â(TM)tâ(Tâ(TM)tM)t â(TM)t&â(TM)t

    3. Re:TempleOS use? by LocalH · · Score: 1

      Druaga1 on YouTube made an about it back in May.

      --
      FC Closer
    4. Re:TempleOS use? by LocalH · · Score: 1

      /. fucked my link. Here's the video.

      --
      FC Closer
    5. Re:TempleOS use? by gman003 · · Score: 1

      I've not tried it myself, but this article was a quite interesting look at the OS and its design.

      It's a very minimalist OS, by intent. Like DOS or AmigaOS, everything just runs at ring 0, no memory protection. This would be a security risk, but a) that's the user's fault and b) networking is the work of Satan anyways. Likewise, there's no "users" or "file permissions". There's minimal hardware support - VGA graphics, PC speaker sound, and that's it.

      While it will clearly never amount to anything in itself, it would not be bad if Linux took some ideas from it, and a similar project with more focus on modern hardware might be able to find success.

  4. Re:The guy was certainly entertaining. by hey! · · Score: 1

    The thing is, ordinary people are just as crazy. There's just more of them.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  5. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's also English for "originally called". Since the rest of the text is in English, I'll assume the author chose to use the English definition for the word.

    I am aware English "stole" the word from French. French stole many words from Latin and corrupted their meanings, too.

  6. An interesting experiment by lucasnate1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I remember correctly, his OS was written completely from scratch and had a few interesting ideas:

    1) All code is compiled JIT, this means that C looks just like a scripting language and you can always break into a debugger.
    2) He made his own dialect of C called HolyC, which was a version of C with small fixes to make it more low-level and accurate.
    3) If I remember correctly symbol tables were global, so that processes could access each other's variables by names, thus allowing libraries to simply work by changing global variables.

    I am sure that somewhere, in his code, there's something to learn from.

    1. Re:An interesting experiment by dcollins · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "If I remember correctly symbol tables were global, so that processes could access each other's variables by names, thus allowing libraries to simply work by changing global variables."

      This is a surprisingly poignant statement on how crazy people really want global entities to exist.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    2. Re:An interesting experiment by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Perhaps the Von Neumann architecture is how it is because it's modeled somewhat after how we think--external storage (books, paper, and now computers) I/O (eyes, ears, mouth) and memory are distinct systems. So when a schizophrenic sets about the task of creating a system, maybe he models it after his own brain or world view. Maybe part of being "crazy" is that parts of the brain access eachother in unconventional ways. Sometimes it's for the better (creative) but often for the worse (paranoid, hallucinating, delusional).

      Now I'm wondering how an alien race might build a computer. Maybe there's a universality to intelligence that pushes them towards Von Neumann. Maybe not.

      In the physical world, witness the arguments about how the metric system is "so much better", but isn't decimal really just a bias that goes all the way back to us counting on our fingers? I hope I live to see the day that octal aliens arrive.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  7. Re:The guy was certainly entertaining. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have an uncle (by marriage) that is clinically schizophrenic. He's similar in his rantings, thinks the government is controlling him, voices talking to him and telling him to what do, etc.

    The thing is, he knows he's nuts, and he makes fun of himself for it. It's pretty amusing to be around him when he starts going on about aliens and government mind control, while also creepy as he talks about the voices controlling him, and then laughs his ass off when he realizes how nuts he sounds.

    He doesn't take medication, but he smokes plenty of pot, and seems to have his condition more-or-less under control.

  8. Religion is not the root of all evil by lucasnate1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While there are many problems with religion, I wonder if modern secularism really offers anything better. Sure, these idiots believe in god, but we believe in 60 genders and in infinite growth. They burn innocent women and rape children, but we cause global warming that will kill much more people in the end, not to mention all the shit we enabled in africa and china just to get cheaper products. They repsect community and friendships, while we... sit alone behind our screen, drenching ourselves in consumerism and pills, trying to forget.

    Are you sure that the secular west managed to do something better? Hell, even Newton and Einstein were partially religious, and not rabid hateful atheists.

    1. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Sure, these idiots believe in god

      Oh look, an ignorant and arrogant Atheist unable to respect another Theist's beliefs and truths. So much for modern secularism offering anything better...

      > Hell, even Newton and Einstein were partially religious

      Newton _also_ wrote *more* about Alchemy then Physics. Funny how _that_ gets overlooked.

      So its OK to be crazy as long as you produce OTHER stuff that works? =P

    2. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that the secular west managed to do something better? Hell, even Newton and Einstein were partially religious, and not rabid hateful atheists.

      I would argue that it has on the whole done better, but that doesn't mean it will be perfect. I suspect that in another few years, the current idiocy surrounding 60 genders will largely die off. Meanwhile religions will continue to believe as they have for centuries or millennia because if you start to pull at the threads of the central tenants of the faith, the whole thing will unravel.

      I also think there's a difference between secularism and the rabid atheists that were as hateful of religious folks as religious folks were of atheists. These seem to be largely the group that moved on to Atheism+ which has swallowed the social justice dogma and act much like the religions that they so despised. I think there was a mistaken belief that secularism would cure people of the type of thinking that leads people to religion. However, I think that this is backwards and that it's that people's way of thinking leads to create and join religions.

      Removing the old religions does nothing to stop religious thinking. It simply means that there's a vacuum to be filled with new religions. Maybe these are more secular in nature, but they have many of the same hallmarks of contemporary religions. Thirty years ago the moral busy bodies of the western world were avid church goers, but reducing the number of church goers did nothing to the number of moral busy bodies. They merely found new homes in the various social justice movements where their holier than thou art attitude fits in just as well as it did in many religious denominations.

      Looking back across human history, it took ages for us to get to this point. It's incredibly presumptuous to assume that the secular west somehow has a silver bullet solution to every problem it confronts and that it will resolve all of them sometime shortly after breakfast. However, I would bet that it has the best chance at pushing humanity forward and that the best qualities of the secular west are being embraced around the world and helping humanity move forward.

    3. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by lucasnate1 · · Score: 2

      Capitalism, freedom, individualism, genderism, social justice, all as much as fantasies as religion, their temples celebrated and funded by secular people.

    4. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by lucasnate1 · · Score: 2

      So its OK to be crazy as long as you produce OTHER stuff that works? =P

      As long one can easily isolate the crazy from the non-crazy and use the non-crazy to better society, and as long as the crazy doesn't violently hurt one, yes. Hell, even if the crazy contributes nothing, but does not hurt anyone, it is ok to be crazy.

    5. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by Prien715 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Many atheists cannot tell the difference between the fiction bin and the rubbish bin.

      Admiring and emulating the fidelity of the Three Musketeers, the deduction ability of Sherlock Holmes or any character other fictional character is the same as how one should read the wisdom of Solomon or the compassion of Jesus. Much better than say, admiring a character from an Ayn Rand novel who are amazing at justifying to themselves and their reader about being an douchbag.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    6. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      Isn't what you are making a typical "no true scotsman" argument? Just as you can select intelligent atheists, I can select intelligent religious people.

    7. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Uh no. It's the religious who are fucking up the planet. Dominion, remember? The Republicans who keep jerking off big oil and the like are always telling us how they're motivated by their religion. They are the ones who believe in infinite growth. They're also the ones who raped Africa in the name of saving it with Jesus. You have it ass-backwards.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      Regarding the conquering of Africa, you are correct, Christianity has a major part in this. Regarding our ecological problems, I think that capitalism (or maybe, if you insist on religion, Protestantism) is more responsible than religion in general. Don't get me wrong, religion has plenty of problems, but I honestly don't think that it it just disappeared things would be better. I guess what I'm wondering is: what will replace it? Would you really prefer a world where SJW/alt-right wars are the new crusades?

    9. Re:Religion is not the root of all evil by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, religion has plenty of problems, but I honestly don't think that it it just disappeared things would be better.

      There aren't enough people who love capitalism to support conservative parties, they have to fall back on people who love Jesus (or whatever.) They would die off (and thus stop supporting capitalism) without religious people to manipulate.

      I guess what I'm wondering is: what will replace it? Would you really prefer a world where SJW/alt-right wars are the new crusades?

      I'd prefer a world where the alt-right are educated in racial issues, but we can't have everything we want. SJWs are often annoying, but since their focus is on letting people do what they want with themselves, I'm pretty much on their side.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. It was suicide by lucasnate1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to wikipedia:

    On the evening of 11th of August 2018, Terry was walking alongside some railroad tracks in the city of The Dalles, when he was accidentally struck by a Union Pacific train coming from behind.

    1. Re:It was suicide by slickwillie · · Score: 1

      Clearly God smited him for that uninitialized pointer.

    2. Re:It was suicide by Megol · · Score: 1

      Accident != suicide

    3. Re:It was suicide by inking · · Score: 1

      People get hit by trains all the time while taking pictures or doing other mundane stuff. One naturally expects to hear a train arrive and thinks that one would have time aplenty to move out of the way, but they are surprisingly quiet. It’s ridiculously easy to get unintentionally killed by one. Seems that Davis joined that lengthy list—unless it was, of course, payback by the CIA for running over one of their fluorescent operatives of African heritage.

  10. Re:Outsider Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Never Hurd of this operating system, but it could open Windows to the mind of this individual who has made himself like the Unix of yore working practically NonStop on this GEM.

    Alas, his operating system wasn't anyone's Pick.

  11. Re:RIP Terry by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    I liked the idea of having a system compiler fast enough to serve as a JIT-scripting engine.

    Then you most certainly like Oberon.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  12. He will be missed by UWM · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We used to prank call Terry Davis sometimes, he used to have some good insights and he could carry on a conversation for a while until he would suddenly "switch gears" and hang up the phone. One time, we even had him and Richard Stallman speak to eachother for a moment.

    And he thought Linus Torvalds was a noob because he never wrote his own compiler.

  13. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

    Do you know the cause of death because I'm not seeing it. For all we know, he died of a heart attack

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  14. Sad news by butzwonker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I followed him from time to time. Some of his rants during his schizophrenic periods were weird, to say the least. Then again, not many people develop a programming language on their own and then use it to program a complete graphical operating system that runs on bare metal with it. It's sad that his schizophrenia wasn't treated earlier and more effectively.

    1. Re:Sad news by AlanObject · · Score: 1

      Even the most chaotic mind seeks out stability and order. In this case it would appear that the afflicted person had enough skill and/or talent to express that urge in the form of software. Based on his own statements in the article that was indeed its purpose.

  15. Re:cia naggers by Tsolias · · Score: 1

    They glow in the Dark

    F

  16. Re:Nigger! by Tsolias · · Score: 1

    He was a simple man.

  17. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Tsolias · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At the time terry was wondering around in 'murica, 'murica didn't have time to take care of Terries, they focused on dreamers, blacks, feminists, gays and hilary.

    A guy has thousands of people documenting his condition, reporting in where he is(which he did also by himself), and so on... yet the public services never gave a shit.

    when did 'murica stopped caring about Americans?

  18. Re:Née? by Calydor · · Score: 1

    It may be because I'm not a native English speaker, but in all my years reading and speaking English with friends all over the planet I have never seen the word 'née' used before.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  19. Re:Née? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    It may be because I'm not a native English speaker, but in all my years reading and speaking English with friends all over the planet I have never seen the word 'née' used before.

    I'm a native English speaker and I've seen it used plenty of times.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  20. Re:Née? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    It's a bit old-fashioned but still in use.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  21. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to negligence

    How do you know what he died of?

    According to Wikipedia, he hit by a train in an accident.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  22. Re:Who? by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Informative

    TempleOS is a fascinating project. It is completely different from everything we currently have, and in some interesting ways.

    Notably, the UI, shell, document format, organization structure, and IDE are all one and the same. Your shell is a text editor where you can embed drawings and link them to other documents, and your documents can be compiled and run with a built-in JIT compiler that also provides its own debug environment.

    It's the opposite paradigm to the Unix "everything is a string" philosophy, and also antithetical to Windows' notion of "everything is a GUI". It's more "everything is connected".

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  23. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    omfg no. It means exactly what it means in French. And there are two words, née and né, just like there are two words fiancé and fiancée depending on whether the person is a man or a woman. when you misuse words you just look stupid.

  24. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by retchdog · · Score: 1

    iirc, mental health centers were cut back significantly under Reagan and no one's bothered to do much about it since then. that's one possible answer, though i'd say that a more accurate answer would be that we never really did.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  25. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by retchdog · · Score: 1

    to elaborate slightly, i don't know how great those mental health centers were on average even when they did exist. there have certainly been horror stories; i just don't know whether they are representative. it's quite possible that they were just places to send humans to rot like garbage out of sight, and we decided not to waste the money on that since they could rot on the street just as well. i don't know.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  26. Religion is literal root of all evil by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Religion is not the root of all evil

    Sure it is. Before religion, was there even a concept of 'evil'? I bet you that religion was what invented the concept of evil when creation myths were being concocted ten thousand years ago.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Religion is literal root of all evil by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      When people lived in tribes or whatever, didn't they have rules? Can't you say that these rules defined good and evil?

    2. Re:Religion is literal root of all evil by scottrocket · · Score: 1

      When people lived in tribes or whatever, didn't they have rules? Can't you say that these rules defined good and evil?

      I think I see the parent's point: Tribes developed rules about things that were desirable, or undesirable (constructive v. destructive). The polarized concepts of "Good" and "Evil" may well have been purely non-secular in origin i.e., religious, spiritual, or generally non-entity supernatural. Ultimately - short of building a time machine - the answer may always be a guessing game.

  27. Re:Née? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Strangely, English got the female "naive" but not the male "naif." That also makes people look stupid when you know French.

  28. C64 by kackle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Notably, the UI, shell, document format, organization structure, and IDE are all one and the same. Your shell is a text editor where you can embed drawings and link them to other documents, and your documents can be compiled and run with a built-in JIT compiler that also provides its own debug environment.

    This, not surprisingly, sounds Commodore 64-ish. For the younger folks, if you turn on a Commodore 64, within 3 seconds you have an OS prompt. From that prompt, you can interact with the OS via commands, including directly viewing/editing contents of registers and memory. You can interact with disk drives, or any other hardware connected to the machine, for that matter. And you can load and execute (and even edit certain) applications. Or, you can just start typing/adding BASIC language lines to the built-in BASIC interpreter. It's not a bad paradigm to mimic, really.

    1. Re:C64 by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that BASIC itself is the system shell, so when you type the "LOAD" and "RUN" commands, you're actually writing a BASIC program that loads new code and overwrites itself. When you load the main index table from a floppy disk, you're actually loading a BASIC program disguised as a directory listing, hence, you use the "LIST" command to show it. Things were interesting in the days of no caches and no memory protection.

      Personally, though, this weirdness is why I hated my C64, and didn't really get into computing and programming until I got an Amiga 1000.

  29. Re:cia naggers by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    He's running over glow in the darks forever now. He hit them with his car, they hit him with a train.

  30. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by q_e_t · · Score: 1

    Schizophrenia is unlikely to be even one disease, and may be a set of common or overlapping symptoms for something like seven separate illnesses. Debate and research continues.

  31. Re:Who? by orsayman · · Score: 1

    Well many people already pointed their favourite OS in response to your post but the idea of having the OS and the IDE in the same project is literally one of the catchphrase of Pharo, itself inspired from Smalltalk... From there it links to Xerox and other great ideas.

  32. Re:Née? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Technically French is Latin, or rather a descendant language of the Vulgar Latin spoken on Rome's Gaulish provinces. It adopted some words of Celtic and Germanic origin, but is a Romance language like Spanish, Italian, Romanian, Gallacian and Portuguese. It didn't borrow Latin words, it was Latin, with about 1500 years of linguistic evolution.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  33. Re:Who? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of a comment I made a long time ago here.. My tongue was firmly in my cheek of course; but there's also a "funny because it's true" angle. It really is fascinating. A man with a pathological mind taking something to its pathological conclusion?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  34. Re:Because trains are oh-so sneaky! by inking · · Score: 1

    He isn’t; you are just entirely clueless. Trains are sneaky. https://www.popularmechanics.c...

  35. Re:Who? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Notably, the UI, shell, document format, organization structure, and IDE are all one and the same. Your shell is a text editor where you can embed drawings and link them to other documents, and your documents can be compiled and run with a built-in JIT compiler that also provides its own debug environment.

    So nothing new then?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  36. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How did this bigoted shit get marked as insightful?

    Mental health services were cut back in the 80s and everyone suffered. Minorities with mental health issues got screwed just as much as white people with mental health issues.

  37. Re:Née? by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    Technically French is Latin, or rather a descendant language of the Vulgar Latin spoken on Rome's Gaulish provinces. It adopted some words of Celtic and Germanic origin, but is a Romance language like Spanish, Italian, Romanian, Gallacian and Portuguese. It didn't borrow Latin words, it was Latin, with about 1500 years of linguistic evolution.

    If French is Latin because parts of it were ONCE Latin, then it, (and all other Romance languages, Germanic languages, indeed, most languages spoken in Europe and Asia today,) are Proto-Indo-European, the ancestor language of them all, except perhaps languages of the Natives of Turtle Island, (aka North America) and other extreme isolates.

    Not to get all argumentative, but the idea that a language is identical with, and indistinguishable from its parent language(s) and could, or worse, SHOULD (or even more absurdly, MUST) be called by the same name as its ancestor because it incorporates elements thereof, is specious and makes discussions of etymology impossible, because SOMEONE keeps insisting that all languages are the same, which is silliness. Also, there's more to a language than just vocabulary; construction, syntax, rules, etc., all play a part, and anyone who has ever studied more than one language, especially when the languages aren't extremely closely related, knows that there's a LOT more to learning a different language than learning the vocabulary. How words are assembled to express ideas varries considerably from one language to another. (This is why a verbatim translation is usually linguistically wrong, unless a sentence or fragment is extremely short and simple.)

    Moreover, since languages change over time, a language can be said to descend from any of the earlier versions of the same language even if there has been no major change to the language resulting from influx or infusions due to the people speaking one language being conquered by those who speak another, (which is how all the Arabic that ends up being in modern Spanish got there, resulting in somewhere around 7% of Spanish being Arabic in origin,) due to internal changes over time in usage, vowel or consonant drift, changes in meaning, diversion, conversion, etc., etc., etc., you can't even really call a language the same thing as even a relatively recent version of itself, without anything being added from without. Modern Vernacular English of today has changed enough in even the last couple of centuries that it has at least become a different dialect, and if you compare Modern English, (even proper, rather than vernacular,) with Middle English or Old English, you'll find them completely different languages, even though all have the word "English" in the name. Yes, there's OFTEN commonality, though sometimes that's coincidental due to similar origins of words. For example, the word for mother, mom, or mama has an "m" sound somewhere in it, usually at/near the beginning in very nearly every human language. Hmm... I wonder why?

    I have a sneaking suspicion that you don't know French, or Latin, let alone both, especially if you think they're the same language.

    To linguists, the most basic measure of whether any two people are speaking the same language is whether they are mutually intelligible. Although you might be able to get by speaking one language amidst a group of people who speak only the other, able to communicate basic ideas and requests, such as, "I'm unwell, I need a doctor," or "where is the bathroom?" or "this is delicious, thanks!" when you start getting deep into a conversation and need to use advanced concepts for which simple words fall short, you will likely find the languages have diverged sufficiently for them to be mutually UNINTELLIGIBLE. I'll give you an example. Understanding that machine translation is less reliable the more esoteric, complicated, or sophisticated the ideas you try to encapsulate with words are, I'm going to use Google Translate here, and save you all the trouble.

    The following paragrap

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  38. Re:Née? by mlyle · · Score: 1

    It's the kind of thing you see in an encyclopedia.

    e.g. from Encyclopedia Britannica

    > Hillary Clinton, in full Hillary Rodham Clinton, née Hillary Diane Rodham, (born October 26, 1947, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.)

    This lets you know what she was originally named.

  39. I tried his OS by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    I ran a copy up in a virtual machine and it worked without an issue. I went through some of the programs and tried to get used to the cli it uses IIRC. One of my colleagues gave it a go as well a few weeks ago.

    I might go back and look at it again, you never know what jewels lie in there from such dedicated creation.

    R.I.P Terry, thank you for something interesting.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  40. Re:Who? by Wescotte · · Score: 1

    You might get a kick out of this lecture by Bret Victor titled The Future of Programming where he looks back at a lot of early ideas in computing.

  41. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Negative. The ACLU sued to have the asylums shut down on the basis that incarcerating people who committed no crime was immoral. They won. Reagan closed the doors on the now-empty facilities. And somehow got the blame for setting people free who were innocent. As long as they could lift spoon to mouth to feed themselves, they were good to go according to the ACLU.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  42. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Tsolias · · Score: 1

    One guy carries generations of taxes on his back, can't have even the basic health care for his condition and is treated like a criminal,
    vs some random person jumping from country to country and ending up in the one that offers him the best conditions.
    Terry didn't do country-shopping. He stayed home, yet he lived like an exiled.

    If you want to call it bigotry, call it that way, if you want to call me racist, please do... I am.
    This doesn't negate the fact that nobody fucking cared about terry, because terry didn't align with the mentality the media and the leftists try to create. That's why he was living in a van and later on in the streets, he had his benefits denied and lived off of donations mainly from people who visited reddit and /g/ and /pol/.
    Your fellow citizen dies like a dog in the streets and your are taking care of leeches.

  43. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Reagan closed them instead of reforming them because the goal was to abandon the insane for monetary reasons, and certainly not for the purpose of helping anyone but the wealthy.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  44. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

    yet the public services never gave a shit.

    The summary stated that he was living on disability, which I'm assuming is funded from Social Security.

    --
    If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
  45. Re:The guy was certainly entertaining. by dddux · · Score: 1

    That's what I think, too. All people are crazy in some way, just more or less crazy. OTOH, what is normal? How does one define what's normal? Normal was different 10000 years ago, 2000 years ago, 100 years ago, or 20 years ago. I said 20 years ago on purpose, because at the time having a mobile phone wasn't regarded as not normal. I don't use a mobile phone, so I'm regarded as being not normal these days. I'm not claiming I am normal, though. :)

    --
    "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  46. Re:Née? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    It's like you read the first sentence of my post, but not the rest.

    The point was that unlike, say, English, which did absorb quite a bit of Latin vocabulary via Norman French, French didn't "absorb" Latin syntax and vocabulary, it is a descendant of Latin. It is what Latin came to be in the former Gaulish provinces after about six or seven hundred years of linguistic evolution. That isn't the same as the propensity of Germanic languages to hoover up words.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  47. Re:Née? by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    It's like you read the first sentence of my post, but not the rest.

    It's like you read the first sentence of my post, but not the rest. Don't worry about it though.

    We'll just have to agree to disagree and leave it at that.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  48. Re:Since when is a proper keyboard layout an iGadg by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    If I could vote, I'd say we should strip off the eighth bit on all char data posted to the site.\

  49. Re:He didn't "pass away". He *died* due to neglige by retchdog · · Score: 1

    interesting. since this is a political topic, i'll have to ask for references.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  50. Re:Since when is a proper keyboard layout an iGadg by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    Your mom's potting shed has to be kinda cramped, you punk.

  51. Re:Who? by orsayman · · Score: 1

    Thanks for this, it's a very interesting lecture. The future is in the past !