'Mindful People' Feel Less Pain, Study Finds (medicalxpress.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Medical Xpress: Ever wonder why some people seem to feel less pain than others? A study conducted at Wake Forest School of Medicine may have found one of the answers -- mindfulness. The researchers analyzed data obtained from a study published in 2015 that compared mindfulness meditation to placebo analgesia. In this follow-up study, Zeidan sought to determine if dispositional mindfulness, an individual's innate or natural level of mindfulness, was associated with lower pain sensitivity, and to identify what brain mechanisms were involved. In the study, 76 healthy volunteers who had never meditated first completed the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory, a reliable clinical measurement of mindfulness, to determine their baseline levels. Then, while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging, they were administered painful heat stimulation.
Whole brain analyses revealed that higher dispositional mindfulness during painful heat was associated with greater deactivation of a brain region called the posterior cingulate cortex, a central neural node of the default mode network. Further, in those that reported higher pain, there was greater activation of this critically important brain region. The default mode network extends from the posterior cingulate cortex to the medial prefrontal cortex of the brain. These two brain regions continuously feed information back and forth. This network is associated with processing feelings of self and mind wandering. The study provided novel neurobiological information that showed people with higher mindfulness ratings had less activation in the central nodes (posterior cingulate cortex) of the default network and experienced less pain. Those with lower mindfulness ratings had greater activation of this part of the brain and also felt more pain, Zeidan said.
Whole brain analyses revealed that higher dispositional mindfulness during painful heat was associated with greater deactivation of a brain region called the posterior cingulate cortex, a central neural node of the default mode network. Further, in those that reported higher pain, there was greater activation of this critically important brain region. The default mode network extends from the posterior cingulate cortex to the medial prefrontal cortex of the brain. These two brain regions continuously feed information back and forth. This network is associated with processing feelings of self and mind wandering. The study provided novel neurobiological information that showed people with higher mindfulness ratings had less activation in the central nodes (posterior cingulate cortex) of the default network and experienced less pain. Those with lower mindfulness ratings had greater activation of this part of the brain and also felt more pain, Zeidan said.
In this context, Mindfulness is an oxymoron, where to become mindful is to remove oneself from one's own mind. It's the application of adding a level of indirection (*) to every variable. For myself, I've rather make everything inline and register variables.
I saw that movie!
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain."
Try walking around w/o a head. Oh wait, ... *thump*
This study resonates with my personal experience. Say I'm in pain at the dentist's, or an insect bite, or fatigue from endurance exercise. I could drop straight into the normal instinctual fight-or-flight emotional response to the pain. But instead I get my mind to observe the pain as a detached analytical observer -- to try to document the sensations of the pain in all their aspects, like a scientist would. I pretend there's no axiom that says "this sensorial experience implies that emotional response". And, hey presto, there the emotional response just doesn't happen.
Before I bother to get excited about this, what was the effect size? It's one thing if this is effective enough to replace painkillers in some patients, but completely another if it's only good for something slightly less painful than a mosquito bite.
Was the pain measured objectively or subjectively?
Mindfulness is the new religion of modern medicine. What exactly is it? No one can clearly explain. How is it achieved? Well, opinions differ. How can it be objectively measured? Yeah, that's what I thought.
But yet we have oh so many "studies" showing mindfulness purported to effective, of course always for conditions like pain or depression/anxiety that they lack good and/or safe treatment for. But substitute "mindfulness" with "prayer" (which itself could be seen as a form of mindfulness), would the study be taken seriously by the medical community? Yet I fail to see any significant difference between the two.
And hey, if it works for you, great! However, it's insulting when a practitioner of supposedly science-based medicine starts touting ill-defined magical solutions as if they were science.
Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
Hey, hey, we gotta be positive!
Mindless people, on the other hand, feel no pain at all... they just inflict it on the rest of us.
http://alternatives.rzero.com/
this survey is almost proving a tautology - people who are in pain a lot become mindful of it, and become more familiar with it
Ask an Endocrinologist. They will explain the interaction. This is just plain ole self-hypnosis...
You don't have to dig very far to see the self-hypnotic aspect of these psychological claims. It's in the language. To infer anything is 'mindful' is some intellectual neer-do-well attempt to call normal behavior 'mindless'. Use negation to understand this one. The same is true of 'positive psychology' or what they consider 'cognition'.
In any case, you have psychological and actual problems if your solution is to withdraw into some kind of solipsistic fantasy world...
And let's not get into the 'replication crisis' facing Psychology...
Mindfulness is the latest zombie cult, one Kool Aid glass short of Jonestown.
Rep-re-ziz-ent!
My personal experience syncs with this.
I recently completed a 10-day Vipassana course meditation course. ~10 hours of seated meditation per day, quite a struggle at first. Midway through the course, you are tasked with sitting for an hour straight without moving, 3 times per day. At first I thought this task impossible, as after 10 minutes my knees and ankles would start hurting terribly from sitting in the lotus position.
However, with practice over just a few sessions, I learned to observe the pain with equanimity, and my obsession with the pain dissipated. The pain was very much still there, but it didn't both me. It was an incredible experience.
I simply have learned to react differently to it. I guess that makes me "mindful".
Mindfulness is clearly the solution to all of life's problems, and totally not worthless buzzword snakeoil.
Here, I filtered out the smooth talk for you!
This is natural. The brain is supposed to make you feel more pain from sources you're not paying attention to. That way you notice and stop getting hurt.
If you aren't mindful of the pain due to using the lotus position, does it matter?
subj
Mindfulness is mostly a fad and a buzzword. It has roots in a lot of Asian meditation techniques and that sounds convincing to a lot of people for some reason. Sure, "mindfulness" is great sometimes. Living in the present moment is great when you can't do anything about the future. But even Buddhism sees the purpose of directed and focused meditation.
Ruminating on trauma or being anxious about the future in a destructive way are, of course, bad symptoms that mindfulness can help treat. But it is also important to remember to introspect deeply about the past and hold ambitions and hopes for the future. I feel like "mindfulness" is a word overused so much that it takes on different meanings - "Be mindful" can sometimes just mean "be considerate" or sometimes it can just mean "stop being anxious." But it also seems it can mean "I don't like the philosophical implications of what you are saying, so I'm going to tell you to ignore everything relevant you're pointing out and live exclusively in the present moment."
Personally, I'm going to use it on debtors.
"Where's that $50 I lent you?" "It's in the past, live in the moment."
"Mindful people" feel less pain, cause more in those hearing their Lululemon'ed asses preach.
Have gnu, will travel.
Almost Always. Almost Always. Almost Always. ...
My answer to all those questions, and I assume the rest, is almost always. So?
How does answering a list of arbitrary, ambiguous, subjective questions give any kind of useful data or create any kind of scale against which scientific issues can be measured and studied?
all the people I've known who were into "mindfulness" were recovering drug addicts.
Maybe that says more about me than "mindfulness".
I don't know how that might affect one's sensitivity to pain. I'm a drunk myself. I tried being mindful, but it's much easier to drink.
Very anecdotal: I think being an alcoholic makes me less sensitive to pain even in those moments when I find myself sober. I have absolutely no evidence for this though.
It could be just an excuse to drink more whenever I hurt.
Mindfulness is the new religion of modern medicine. What exactly is it? No one can clearly explain. How is it achieved? Well, opinions differ. How can it be objectively measured? Yeah, that's what I thought.
But yet we have oh so many "studies" showing mindfulness purported to effective, of course always for conditions like pain or depression/anxiety that they lack good and/or safe treatment for. But substitute "mindfulness" with "prayer" (which itself could be seen as a form of mindfulness), would the study be taken seriously by the medical community? Yet I fail to see any significant difference between the two.
And hey, if it works for you, great! However, it's insulting when a practitioner of supposedly science-based medicine starts touting ill-defined magical solutions as if they were science.
Mindfulness is the new religion of modern medicine. What exactly is it? No one can clearly explain. How is it achieved? Well, opinions differ. How can it be objectively measured? Yeah, that's what I thought.
But yet we have oh so many "studies" showing mindfulness purported to effective, of course always for conditions like pain or depression/anxiety that they lack good and/or safe treatment for. But substitute "mindfulness" with "prayer" (which itself could be seen as a form of mindfulness), would the study be taken seriously by the medical community? Yet I fail to see any significant difference between the two.
And hey, if it works for you, great! However, it's insulting when a practitioner of supposedly science-based medicine starts touting ill-defined magical solutions as if they were science.
It is kind of self hypnosis. You control your breathing and concentrate only on that breathing. Five minutes every day calms you down as your anxiety is reduced and allows you to accept what ever is happening as they are. Self pity, ego etc., are slowly removed. Before exam, a date or interview this technique works very well. Buddhist found this a long time back and now it is slowly spreading in our West. Prayer has religious connotation and you have to follow some rigid rules- clean place, repeating some memorized sentences or phrases etc., whereas Mindfulness is just focusing on your breathing without any religious connotation. Mindfulness can be practiced anywhere and every where. Your mental aging is also slowed down and you feel refreshed. I do this every day not because of any one ordering me or forced me, rather I just discovered this when I was taking a course on Yoga. So, don't bring GOD into this. He or she has given you a brain and freedom to think and dogmatism is out of this self help. I had a major operation and the anesthesia did not work. But I went through the excruciating pain without any objection and remembered all the conversations the doctor's had. I felt happy to know the procedures they did. So, if you are really educated and have done research as part of your education, you will verify this.
aaaand here come all the subs / bottoms talking about how they are such "heavy bottoms" because of mindfulness.
I heard somewhere that during WW2, the Japanese Kamikaze pilots used to practice mindfulness meditation. You see, it helped them to lose their ego, to return to some sort of animal state, right before they committed suicide into the side of an American navy vessel.
So hooray for "mindfulness", I guess.
I can smell the new age monies backing this from here. Horse S H I T.
This sounds like the use of a dialect of jargon, in a public setting. That is Not a Good Thing.
It seems very different from the jargon we use in tech, but the same problems can occur. Using "made up" languages in public cause confusion. (And are even used intentionally to cause confusion.)
Failure to translate jargon to standard, will certainly cause things that you don't want. Remember this article, the next time you communicate with people that are not in your work group! 8-)
Some of the comments suggest that "mindfulness" is in fact a clinical term of art - but to most people it's a woo-woo term of (pseudo-)spirituality and in the same general space as astrology and homeopathic medicine. So what are we really talking about here?
Mudge
In theory, theory and practice are the same.
In practice, they're not.