Slashdot Mirror


Crypto Growth Nears 'Ceiling,' Ethereum Co-Founder Buterin Says (bloomberg.com)

The days of explosive growth in the blockchain industry have likely come and gone now the average person is aware of its existence, according to Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum. From a report: "The blockchain space is getting to the point where there's a ceiling in sight," Buterin said in a Sept. 8 interview with Bloomberg at the Ethereum Industry Summit conference in Hong Kong. "If you talk to the average educated person at this point, they probably have heard of blockchain at least once. There isn't an opportunity for yet another 1,000-times growth in anything in the space anymore." Growth in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in the blockchain community through its first six or seven years was dependent on marketing and trying to get wider adoption, Buterin said. "That strategy is getting close to hitting a dead end," he said.

87 comments

  1. The shoeshine principal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the shoeshine boy is telling you what to invest in, you can be pretty confident that the boom is over.

  2. A Ceiling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody's student loan money is near spent.

    1. Re:A Ceiling by gweihir · · Score: 5, Informative

      To be fair, anybody investing their student loan in crypto-currencies would probably not have benefited from an academic education anyways....

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:A Ceiling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, anybody investing their student loan in crypto-currencies would probably not have benefited from an academic education anyways....

      But, they may have finally earned a passing grade in Fools 104: How Soon to Part With Your Money from the University of Hard Knocks.

    3. Re:A Ceiling by perpenso · · Score: 1

      To be fair, anybody investing their student loan in crypto-currencies would probably not have benefited from an academic education anyways....

      You sure, isn't the "greater fool" theory likely covered in microeconomics 101?

    4. Re:A Ceiling by gweihir · · Score: 1

      It should be. But the Greater Fool Theory is pretty obvious and easily researched, so I doubt these people will understand that they are following it even if taught about it academically. And only a faction will have gotten those loans for studies in economics. Educational success depends on some base level common-sense, insight and understanding of self being there, otherwise it does not work.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:A Ceiling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What people call common sense is usually culturally learned behavior. You must have grown up around some real assholes to think scam artists are normal.

    6. Re:A Ceiling by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Common sense is successfully applied intelligence for plausibility checking, no cultural aspect. As to scam artists, have a look into the world and you see scams everywhere. You are probably just blind to them or naive.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:A Ceiling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What people call common sense is usually culturally learned behavior. You must have grown up around some real assholes to think scam artists are normal.

      That sounds like your common sense speaking. Perhaps you grew up around too many assholes? I happened to grow up around Great Depression Era grandparents who liked to tell their kids and grandkids about saving for a rainy day, buying the house or car you can comfortably afford, avoid debt (home mortgage being a rare exception), being suspect of ideas that sound too good to be true, etc.

  3. There's only so much weed to be smoked by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and money to be laundered. Those two things form the backbone of the crypto economy because they're both things that have a high risk tolerance. You don't care if somebody doesn't pay you for your dime bag because you're selling a bag of literal weeds for $100 bucks. If 10 folks stiff you and one pays you're way out ahead. The same's true for generic money laundering. The money's no good if you can't use it cleanly and without being caught, so you don't care if you lose half of it to transaction fees.

    There's growing pressure to crack down on money laundering via bitcoin; mostly because governments have just plain caught up and caught on. And there's growing pressure to legalize drugs. There's where your ceiling is. A few more high profile money launderers will get caught (Bitcoin really isn't that good for it, it just took a while for the gov't to notice it was being used) and a few wins by left wing parties and that'll kind of be that when it comes to crypto.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:There's only so much weed to be smoked by gweihir · · Score: 1

      It will be interesting to see how much money laundering was really going on. I think it was quite a bit, but nobody seems to have hard data. I do expect some bright PhD student will wrest this info from the blockchain eventually, at least as a reasonable approximation.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:There's only so much weed to be smoked by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You don't care if somebody doesn't pay you for your dime bag because you're selling a bag of literal weeds for $100 bucks. If 10 folks stiff you and one pays you're way out ahead.

      Try that shit on the street and see how it goes for you. Please report back, I could use a good laugh.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:There's only so much weed to be smoked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't care if somebody doesn't pay you for your dime bag because you're selling a bag of literal weeds for $100 bucks.

      just FYI "dime bag" has a meaning, it's $10 worth of weed

  4. They are running out of idiots with money? by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Was bound to happen eventually. This is the classic behavior of every pyramid scheme: At some time you have all the morons with money in there and do not find enough new ones. Then the whole thing comes crashing down.

    Will be interesting to see ho it happens here, because crypto currencies (not "crypto", _that_ is something else) are a bit differently structured than the classical pyramid schemes. They are fundamentally the same though.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:They are running out of idiots with money? by Moof123 · · Score: 2

      But I thought Bitcoin was supposed to be the new reserve currency?! Say it isn't so! Hodl man. Hodl.

    2. Re:They are running out of idiots with money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At some time you have all the morons with money in there and do not find enough new ones.

      And yet there's a sucker born every minute.

      This shit's just Cloud 2.0. Hell, "TEH BLOCKCHAIN!" is less recognizable than "TEH CLOUD!" was nearly two decades ago. But it's playing out the same way. Bunch of assholes who don't understand the industry they're pimping to are promising that their Patent Tonic can cure the marthambles; the strong fives; female hysteria!

      Of course it can't. But in fifteen years or so, technology will have improved, actual useful applications will have been devised, and someone who isn't a $100k bit player will be making a fortune on Magic Internet Money.

    3. Re:They are running out of idiots with money? by supremebob · · Score: 1

      Umm... I think that "TEH CLOUD!" hype only started a decade ago. "TEH INTERWEBS!" hype over crap web companies like pets.com and mplayer.com is two decades old.

    4. Re:They are running out of idiots with money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pyramid schemes are infinite growth paradigms. Bitcoin is finite. You're either stupid or shorting. Either way, you're an ass.

    5. Re:They are running out of idiots with money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you're a Bitcoin maximalist. Nobody else - not even the BCH guys - bought into that farse.

    6. Re:They are running out of idiots with money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do tell. What with fractional coins able to be used, please explain how Bitcoin has an effectively limited supply.

      While you're at it, please solve this paradox - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    7. Re:They are running out of idiots with money? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      And you are idiot with no insight. No implementation of a pyramid scheme is infinite. Seriously.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:They are running out of idiots with money? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair the data-type used in bitcoin is finite in its resolution, it is just so fine-granular it does not matter. Same, incidentally, as any classical pyramid-scheme is finite, as there is only a finite amount of currency available. In both case, you can do a meaningless extension to the infinite, for classical pyramid by predicting that money can be printed (or electronically) in larger and larger volumes and for bitcoin by predicting a move to a representation of smaller sub-divisions. Both things do not make sense, except to those with absolutely no understanding of reality (like, for example, the crypto-currency believers).

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. In other words, people have to actually use it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The growth is all based on people thinking they're all going to get rich. We're running out of suckers is the problem here, so we're not going to get another 1000x growth in value because there's not enough crazy people with money left.

    The problems with cryptocurrency are twofold. Transaction prices have spiked to more than $1 sometimes. That's not particularly attractive as an additional fee. Bitcoin has had even HIGHER fees.

    The second problem is volatility. If you hold the currency for just 6 months you could suddenly either lose 90% of its value, or gain 10x. Neither one is good for using it for transactions.

    Both problems need to be solved, otherwise cryptocurrency is going nowhere.

    1. Re:In other words, people have to actually use it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree. It is impractical even as a temporary store of value because of the absurd volatility numbers. In the time it takes to complete a BTC transaction the value can swing 20% in either direction.

      Until the volatility is similar to that of paper currency, it will never be practical or safe to use it in lieu of.

  8. Dogecoin disagrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The past few weeks has shown over 100% growth while everything else is in the red. TO THE MOON.

    1. Re:Dogecoin disagrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, doge. The coin that started as a joke. That's where the smart money is going.

    2. Re: Dogecoin disagrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boring Company started that way too.

    3. Re:Dogecoin disagrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the chain started as a joke and it's name still is, but being decentralized it's morphed into something legitimate that can't be stopped by the original joker.

    4. Re: Dogecoin disagrees by nickovs · · Score: 1

      Boring Company started that way too.

      Yup, but they are going to have a hard time going to the moon.

      --
      If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
  9. Idiots by Doc+Right · · Score: 1

    I swear, I'm surrounded by idiots. "Oh, it's a scam!" "No, it's a stock!" "It's a ponzi scheme!" --- Guys guys guys... It's just money. "Digital Cash." Powered by a novel idea. You don't invest in Euros like stocks, do you? You don't think about Pesos when buying Cheetos at an American 7-11, do you? Of course not. Then why are you trying to complicate Cryptocurrency? It's just "Digital Cash" for buying stuff on the Internet, when you don't want to mess with (or have access to) credit cards. Get out of this speculative investment mindset. See it for what it is, and what value that has. CASH.

    1. Re:Idiots by wed128 · · Score: 2

      Except it's not very good for that.Cash needs to have somewhat stable value -- so far there isn't a cryptocurrency that has that.

    2. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's got all the qualities of a useful currency - convenience, simplicity, and stability. Like you, I just don't understand why people don't see this and dump USD for BTC in everyday transactions.

    3. Re:Idiots by supremebob · · Score: 1

      That's the big problem with cryptocurrency right now. In order for it to be used as a replacement for cash, it's value needs to become stable and it's transactions need to regulated for fraud protection.

      That said, nobody wants to invest in a cryptocurrency that doesn't increase in value and is regulated to the point where any limited gains that you do get from it are taxed by the IRS.

    4. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not even close to being that simple. I could launch my own cryptocurrency right now and tell you the exact same thing: "It's cash!" You wouldn't buy into it, though, and neither would anyone else. It's not tied to anything, either by a physical commodity or otherwise, unlike fiat or stocks. Cryptocurrencies are only tied to public perception, which is supremely volatile. This may change, but it hasn't. It will need to be tied to something else before this perception changes, and then you will be right.

    5. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You don't invest in Euros like stocks, do you?

      I assure you there's a whole market for nothing but trading traditional currencies like Euros. People definitely speculate in it, and people lose their shirts. People also make investments with cash, it's called a bond. But you need the currency to be able to do that.

      The point being that Euros, dollars, etc are all investment vehicles in one way or another, and aren't purely used to pay for goods and services.

      Get out of this speculative investment mindset. See it for what it is, and what value that has. CASH.

      The speculative mindset isn't going to go away for the simple fact that it hasn't gone away with. The difference between crytocurrencies and traditional ones is simply that the speculative market completely dwarfs the ability to exchange CCs for goods and services.

    6. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never heard of DEX tokens, have you?

      Very few crypto projects are cash replacements or "digital money".

    7. Re:Idiots by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Tether?

    8. Re:Idiots by mikeabbott420 · · Score: 1

      transaction processing is slow, limited in scope, unpredictable, and energy intensive. this limits the value of 'digital cash' as a transaction medium, leaving it to be used primarily as a speculative store of value.

      --
      This program was made possible by a grant from the Ultra-Humanite, and viewers like you.
    9. Re:Idiots by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Compared to "real cash"? The buying power of consumers have been going DOWN for decades now, all thanks to governments and their ability to print money.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    10. Re:Idiots by Doc+Right · · Score: 0

      Stable compared to what? Why should you care? Buy it, use it, receive it, exchange it. Boom. Easy money. There's plenty of options for accepting cryptocurrency online. WordPress site? Use WooCommerce and MyCryptoCheckout. Building your own? Coinbase has their Commerce API (which I use). It's easy and getting easier every day. And if you insist on holding on to it, its value will increase NATURALLY over time.

  10. Buterin is usual wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read his Twits... it's comical

  11. Ethereum under $200 by xack · · Score: 1

    Just hoping I can get an AMD RX680 cheap when they come out.

  12. Isn't he the guy by slickwillie · · Score: 1

    who traded most or all of his Etherium for a pizza or soerng? (Note - I haven't RTFA yet.)

    1. Re:Isn't he the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. He's a co-founder of Ethereum. He did trade some ETH for about $30 million last December, though.

      They don't call him the "money skeleton" for nothing.

    2. Re:Isn't he the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he is the hammer licker.

  13. Room to grow with common usage by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2

    A cryptocurrency could go up a lot again if one becomes commonly used.

    Right now, a very small percentage of the population holds any cryptocurrency, and a tiny percentage of worldwide financial transactions are conducted in cryptocurrency.

    If this changed - if one became popular for financial transactions, where a lot of the population carried some device that could complete cryptocurrency transactions as easily as a credit card, and many or most businesses accepted cryptocurrency, than whatever currency wins that "common usage" battle still has a long way up. The price is just supply and demand, and large numbers of people acquiring some currency to use as currency = demand and would drive up the price further.

    I don't know when or if that would happen, but it's conceivable that a cryptocurrency could, at some point, become very easy to use and offer some advantage(s) over other currencies such that it was widely adopted for use as a general currency, which would cause at least one more run up in price for any currency that does that.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    1. Re:Room to grow with common usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These two idea are directly opposed to one another. Currency used for common transactions must be relatively stable or you encounter problems. Large run ups in value are just as problematic as declines for those who just want to complete transactions. If the currency is just a medium for transactions, that doesn't really add much value to the currency itself. If the end game for legitimate businesses is to convert back to a "real" currency at some point (need to pay taxes), then no business really needs to hold any of the crypto currency other than during the instantaneous transaction period. Fundamentally that is a simultaneous bid/ask in the market.

      I don't know if you see where this is going but if you are paying attention you will realize that the businesses accepting the crypto don't need to hold it and won't want to hold it. Thus the "demand" for the currency specifically due to it being used as a common transaction mechanism is zero because the business accepting the coin instantly becomes a sell of the coin. As long as taxes and other legitimate transactions require dollars, people will be REQUIRED to convert back to dollars and thus DOLLARS will still be the ultimate currency.

    2. Re:Room to grow with common usage by timholman · · Score: 1

      Right now, a very small percentage of the population holds any cryptocurrency

      More accurately: "Right now, a very small percentage of the population holds all the available cryptocurrency." In a nutshell, that is why every cryptocurrency is doomed from the outset. The concentration of "wealth" in the hands of the crypto-elite would makes paupers and slaves of the rest of us, assuming the world was foolish enough to adopt one.

      Think about it: some dude living in a basement creates a cryptocurrency which by design is limited to a specific number of tokens, and for which he happens to own 10% to 40% of the entire worldwide supply. And then he says to the world, "Hey people, fight the banks! Fight the government! Become the new wealthy class, and use my cryptocoins as money!" How delusional does he have to be to believe that the truly wealthy people in this world will hand over their assets to him, just so they can conduct transactions in a cryptocurrency created by someone else, when they could just as easily create one of their own?

      The cryptocurrency craze is driven by people who are foolish enough to think that they will become the new wealthy class by "investing" their money in what is effectively a pyramid scheme. And the craze is manipulated by people who are laughing all the way to the bank as they separate the fools from their money.

      No cryptocurrency will ever gain any long-term traction so long as it is designed to make early adopters fabulously wealthy by default. The problem is that almost every cryptocurrency is designed precisely that way, because promising riches and power to those who get in on the ground floor is their main appeal - just as with any other pyramid scheme.

  14. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't believe all the people in here thinking cryptos were only for buying drugs. I guess everyone forgot when payments to Wikileaks were blocked by Visa and the fact that Venezuela and Argentina are collapsing. Italy doesn't look hot, Deutsche Bank will probably blow up in everyone's face. Not to mention US debt is unsustainable.

    The dollar is riddled with debt. A dollar isn't actually worth a dollar. When everyone realizes this that's when cryptos will explode.

    1. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So people will buy cryptos, with real currency that isn't worth anything?

      Nice logic LOL.

  15. A riddle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That makes sense to me. If cryptocurrency was a replacement for cash, then it wouldn't be very exciting to invest in cryptocurrency. And if it's exciting to invest in cryptocurrency (which so far it certainly has been), then it wouldn't be a replacement for cash. Yet the cryptocurrency experts tell us the end game is that it WILL be a replacement for cash.

    Anyone care to solve this riddle? I'm not aware of any form of cash that was once exciting to invest in, but now functions as a stable medium of exchange.

    1. Re: A riddle by xtal · · Score: 1

      Show me a exchange medium that has the payment clearinghouse built in.

      I canâ(TM)t instantly send .001g of gold to someone in africa. Or anything else, for that matter.

      --
      ..don't panic
  16. Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoin by TrustYourAssets · · Score: 2

    I'm not trying to argue pro or con bitcoin here, but I'm surprised people on the comments here are no more informed that people on other popular social media platforms. I see a lot of, scam, drug, money laundering, fake money. People don't really seem to know the different between bitcoin and the other cryptos. Or the basic concept that holding bitcoin is using bitcoin (Ansel Lindner said that), it's use case isn't to buy coffee right now, it's more of a store of value, digital gold. Again I'm not trying to post this as pro or con, just the level of understand of this space isn't very high on slashdot

    1. Re:Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoin by James+Carnley · · Score: 1

      Slashdot was also very against the iPod and other major innovations. This website is ironically filled with Luddites.

    2. Re:Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again I'm not trying to post this as pro or con, just the level of understand of this space isn't very high on slashdot

      Oh, we know what it is, we just haven't fallen for it, because so many of the claims of it were bullshit from the start.

      From the get go, claiming to have a currency which was beyond the reach of regulators was laughable, because the regulators don't care that you think you're not covered by them.

      For the last year or so we have heard endless stories about how bitcoin and others would change the world .. how it would be a currency free from government interference .. how it would solve all of the problems with traditional money. We've seen stories about people going all in on bitcoin. Or spending thousands on machines to mine it. Or creating some underground lair to mine it.

      Time was I couldn't go a week without the radio covering yet another "what is cryptocurrency" story during my commute, and every idiot under the sun said "yarg, OMG, I'ma buy teh crypto and be teh rich".

      Every time someone says "yeah, but ..." they're shouted down by the Faithful who think cryptocurrency is magical.

      So, yeah, we've watched the bubble happen, we've heard endless news stories about it, we've seen people lose their shirts, the exchanges get ripped off, startups take the money and run without actually doing anything..

      We've mostly concluded it's more hype that reality.

      it's more of a store of value, digital gold.

      Ahh, you are still trying to prop up the value so you can sell yours before it tanks?

      Digital gold my fucking ass. That's the exact problem with cryptocurrencies, people have been acting like it is digital gold.

    3. Re:Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoin by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Haha I was going to bring up the iPod debut article. Everyone shitting on it saying nobody would buy that Apple is going to tank wtf are they thinking.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    4. Re:Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoin by TrustYourAssets · · Score: 1

      It's comments like this where I don't think you're really seeing it for what it is and just looking at media click bait. I agree most cryptos are scams and have CEOs that can be shut down. I personally think only bitcoin has a store of value worth anything. There's no bubble, it's just some consolidation right now. I think the difference is I don't really think about price. Many people really like the decentralization, which has proven for bitcoin to be true (not ETH). For me what really clicked is the ability to clear money without trust. I think for some people the concept really clicks, for me it's not a get rich quick scam, it's something revolutionary. If you don't see it, there's not much I can say. I used to also think it was a scam or video game money at first as well. Most people who are very pro bitcoin also used to think it was a scam.

    5. Re:Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoin by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Again I'm not trying to post this as pro or con, just the level of understand of this space isn't very high on slashdot

      I think the problem is that we understand it all too well.

      All scammers get irritated when the mark recognises the scam.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    6. Re:Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoin by TrustYourAssets · · Score: 1

      No, I'd expect better reasons as to why bitcoin a scam. If you say the large community or original members who are telling you to invest in bitcoin is going to cash-out and leave, they would have done that 5+ years ago. I think most people agree that bitcoin has established some sort of value.

    7. Re:Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once, people here workshipped Google and downmodded to hell anyone who dared speak against it or predict what kind of company they would become in the near future. Now who's laughing.

    8. Re:Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoin by TrustYourAssets · · Score: 1

      You have some of the best developers and cryptographers working on this platform, not scam artists. Along with VCs investing billions of dollars in this industry, I think we're past this point

    9. Re:Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoin by jwymanm · · Score: 1

      A lot of us are pro crypto currency but we get drowned out by the 500 comments from anonymous cowards and shill accounts stating how terrible it is. It's open source, it sends damn near instantly anywhere in the world (and with spacechain and eth outside of this world also), a lot of coins are distributed and exchanges are becoming distributed to avoid gov persecution. There are tons of new developments almost monthly and it's a lot of fun to go to the conferences which for the most part are jammed full (check out BOB in Chicago). It's fine. The bullshit will calm down as more and more cool advancements come and people realize some of the projects are for awesome communities (see Tezos) and not to feed corporations or corrupt governments. There are still opensource people here who can appreciate damn near every coin is opensource and cross platform.

    10. Re:Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Store of value" and "I don't really think about price" are highly contradictory at face value. If you can hold those two concepts in your skull with a handwaving "something revolutionary" argument, then the problem is that nothing the critics can say will persuade you -- you appear to have simply decided the critics are wrong.

      As I see it, the value of something like Bitcoin is in the vibrancy of the network, but the network is not an inherently stable thing. The Bitcoin network is a fundamentally amorphous collection of mercenary individuals, most of whom will happily switch over to another crypto network if the bounties are better. In other words, every individual cryptocurrency is locked in a life or death struggle with every other cryptocurrency in the larger ecosystem, where the barriers to entry are low. How can that ever be a "store of value"?

    11. Re:Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoin by _merlin · · Score: 1

      And yet, the iPod in its original form is dead. The iPod as "your whole music library in your pocket" died as they moved to Flash-based iPods with less storage. Now the push is towards streaming where you don't even have a music library as such. The iPod was very successful for a while, but in the end Apple themselves killed it, not the market.

  17. Just Another Damage Control Attempt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems like just another damage control attempt (among so many other similar damage control attempts keep getting tried!) to make cryptocurrency investors think everything is okay and there is nothing to worry about!

    IMHO, any smart crypto investors should try to get away with any money they have left, instead of keep "HODLing" until the end!
    (Because almost certainly the end will happen very fast, and so, most people will not have any chance of getting back any money at all!)

  18. Re: In other words, people have to actually use it by xtal · · Score: 1

    The first thing is for people to decide BTC has value. Weâ(TM)re there, I think.

    The second is to decide how much. Thatâ(TM)s being figured out now.

    Bitcoin enables technologies like the Lightning Network - which offers distributed micro payments, for the first time in history - and was a keen interest of a former fearless leader here, RobLimo.

    The shitcoins are indeed that, and there were a 1000 pets.com for every Amazon. BTC solves real problems and lets me pay for things like VPN services that would be a real headache, and let folks process payments from countries where banking systems are nonexistent.

    Wait until people realize they can monetize their content directly without the ads.. and youâ(TM)ll see some interesting things happen.

    --
    ..don't panic
  19. Aw, poor little Juden shekelboy, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMPERSONATING ME? Please... grow up. I must admit what I read about the jews bears out to be accurate though.

    I give folks what they want vs. your machinations, lol & THUS I always will win... & you KNOW it.

    (You really ARE too STUPID to live... time to FIRE UP THE OVENS again & Zyklon B showers).

    Ever see Dr, Strange? Keep it up, that's EXACTLY what I want "JudenMammu" - you're MY prisoner.

    I must admit what I read about the jews bears out to be accurate though.

    Quote George Washington father of our country:

    "They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy's armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in. It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America." - George Washington

    APK

    P.S.=> Glad I am NOT jewish or their thieving slanteye FUCK mongoloids allies the Chinese who steal from greatness (like me and my hosts file engine)... apk

  20. APK Imposter Detection System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    WARNING: APK Imposter Detected!

    Condition - no "See Subject" line

  21. Re:Anyone else read Buterin as "butter in" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you ever saw the guy, you wouldn't say that.

  22. Fuck you you stalking little cunt... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See my subject: I'd kick YOUR FUCKING ASS JUDE for stalking & harassing me you unidentifiable little cowardly hook nose cunt - tell me your REAL name, address, & phone # so I can verify it's REALLY you & we can settle this once & for all, fucker...

    * OH, I know (& so does everyone else to YOUR public dismay & humiliation which your UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts only PROVE for me all the more)... you're a waste of life UNDEREDUCATED all cheap "talk" imbecile.

    Everyone SEES you constantly stalking & harassing me bitch, so WHO ARE YOU FOOLING but yourself - & IF I ever get to you? You'll WISH you were dead cocksucker.

    You're the HATED minority ALL THRU HISTORY only fooling YOURSELVES, lol - self deluded morons & thieves

    APK

    P.S.=> It has to SUCK to be a total DOUCHE loser like you, lol - but you DO have 1 somewhat redeeming quality (lmao) - CHUMP do-nothing "ne'er-do-wells" like YOU do MAKE ME look GOOD @ your wasted life expense (hahahahaha)... apk

  23. Re: The BONERshine principal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound overweight and unhealthy. Get that taken care of.

  24. Re: Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice user name. Glad no one is taking advice from you.

  25. Re: Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone who got in early did cash out already. What are you talking about?

  26. Re: In other words, people have to actually use it by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Wait until people realize they can monetize their content directly without the ads.. and youâ(TM)ll see some interesting things happen.

    And this is where the smaller coins like Dogecoin, Reddcoin and Digibyte will shine. They'll probably never reach a value of $10K per coin, but $1 to $100 per coin might be possible since they're all divisible to 8 decimals just like Bitcoin.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  27. STOP CALLING IT CRYPTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will post this every time I see a Slashdot story propagating the B$ term. 'Crypto' is a generic prefix and is meaningless on its own. Aside from that, it already has a traditional use as shorthand for *cryptography*, not the chain-of-partial-hash-collisions which burn perfectly good energy the world could use elsewhere, that passes for 'blockchain'.

  28. Damn You S-Curve!!!!! by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 1

    When will we ever learn that "Exponential Growth" cannot, and does not, continue indefinitely. Oh, that's right, I forgot, we have an entire economic and investment fantasy constructed on the premise that unlimited exponential growth is feasible. I guess they never went through the "bunnies" thought exercise in biology/ecology class.

  29. Re: Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoi by TrustYourAssets · · Score: 1

    I have no advice to give, I'm just surprised of how many people are anti-bitcoin on a tech site.

  30. Re: Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoi by TrustYourAssets · · Score: 1

    Most of the people early on in bitcoin haven't gone anywhere.

  31. Re: Interesting slashdot people are not pro-bitcoi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no advice to give, I'm just surprised of how many people are anti-bitcoin on a tech site.

    Because most here already saw the hype train start years ago. Just because this is a tech site doesn't mean that everyone here is going to fawn over everything that is "tech" regardless of it's actual merit. Slashdot is one of the few places that comes across as a voice of reason in the tech world.

  32. Not even close by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    Half of humanity isn't even on the internet yet. Only a minority of internet users use cryptocurrency, and of the ones that do, many don't use it for very much that's substantial in their lives. We've got at *least* another doubling of value to go.
    One way to get to the next billion would be, oh I don't know, a working ethereum client in debian .

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  33. Bullshit- only NH has seen significant promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It took 40 years for credit cards to see widespread adoption. The problem right now is that people mostly see the value in crypto currency- but not its application- because promotion hasn't even occurred at the local level. That application is the reduction in the transactional costs of doing business. Until you have businesses accepting it there won't be significant user adoption. In New Hampshire we get that because libertarians have done an amazing job getting businesses setup to accept crypto currencies. As a result New Hampshire is the only place (outside of Caracas Venezuela where the need was obvious, ie because of multiple failed fiat currencies) in the world where you can actually step into a shop and find a cashier who actually knows how to take it or find a business that actually accepts it (I'm sorry- but I travel the world regularly- and I have yet to find a place which is actually taking it, including Austin Texas, which gives me a laugh when people say its a libertarian hotbed, and I could not find a single restaurant that actually took it while there, though one exception in PA exists in some small town, there was some small ass game store owner that was more interested in selling Bitcoin to me than taking it who did take it, but didn't even have a point of sale system to take it, rather he only had a wallet, and that was on my way to Columbus Ohio for a Linux conference, at which point again, nobody actually took it once I arrived in that city either who claimed to).

    New Hampshire sees regular advertising of crypto currencies on the radio, in newspapers, at stores with stickers, at multiple places setups to support it with educational materials (from the Bitcoin Shop in Portsmith to the Blockchain Institute of Technology in Portsmith to 101 Local Goods and another education center that is being setup), plus numerous crypto currency groups throughout the state that have all been operating for a very long time now (in crypto terms any way). New Hampshire had the very first conference/event where Bitcoin was accepted up in Lancaster New Hampshire! That was before the very first Bitcoin or crypto currency conference.