Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Will Use the Cloud To Free Up Disk Space (arstechnica.com)

The next update to Windows 10, due to be released in October, will be smarter about how it frees up disk space and cleans up temporary files. Ars Technica reports: As part of its Storage Sense feature, Windows will be able to automatically remove the local copies of OneDrive files (unless they've been set as always available offline). The operating system will determine which files to remove based on when they were opened: files used more recently than a certain number of days will be retained locally, while those that haven't been used will be replaced with placeholders. The system will remove files until the operating system reckons it has enough free space for normal operation.

Storage Sense will also be able to remove temporary or otherwise unneeded files such as system logs and image thumbnails. It will also be able to remove old files from the download directory. The temporary-file cleanup (which can also remove certain cache files, driver packages, old anti-virus definitions, and more) was previously handled by the Disk Cleanup tool. That tool is now deprecated, as Storage Sense does everything it used to do and more. Storage Sense can perform its cleanup process periodically (every day, week, or month) or automatically whenever the system is low on disk space.

204 comments

  1. why I won't use onedrive by lophophore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's all I need, files magically disappearing from my local media.

    Thanks but no thanks.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
    1. Re:why I won't use onedrive by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      And Microsoft promising not to leak your files or snoop in them. Oh wait, will they even promise that.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:why I won't use onedrive by rudy_wayne · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Storage Sense can perform its cleanup process periodically (every day, week, or month) or automatically whenever the system is low on disk space."

      That's a great feature.

      If it's 1987.

    3. Re: why I won't use onedrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That and every other reason not to use it

    4. Re:why I won't use onedrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they promise to have total access to all your files, right in the EULA.

      The real question is: are these even YOUR files at this point?

    5. Re: why I won't use onedrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Just no

    6. Re:why I won't use onedrive by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0

      LOL! Microsoft photocopies another feature from Apple. iCloud has done this for years, but Microsoft toots it's bent, little horn about another "innovation" as branded feature.

      What a joke.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    7. Re:why I won't use onedrive by spire3661 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Apple's approach in insane. Its either 'let us do it all for you' or 'well fuck you, you are on your own'. Also, they have two different paradigms for how they treat the device. Itunes treats the device as disposable, where all master copies reside on the computer. For photos, it treats the device as a sacred repository where anything deleted of it also deletes the master copy on the server. Its outright stupid.

      --
      Good-bye
    8. Re:why I won't use onedrive by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Those are true enough. Each app has its own policy on storage, synchronization and master/source-of-truth.
      I'm onboard for file storage - I don't use iPhoto, and iTunes contains only music I provided, not bought from their store.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    9. Re:why I won't use onedrive by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      And Microsoft promising not to leak your files or snoop in them. Oh wait, will they even promise that.

      Microsoft... still evil. Not changed at all.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    10. Re:why I won't use onedrive by TurboStar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's all I need, files magically disappearing from my local media. Thanks but no thanks.

      Don't enable the "Files On-Demand" function and it'll make every file available always."Files On-Demand" is there today but all it does is, for example, not download a file you created on PC#1 to PC#2 until you try to access it on PC#2. The new feature uses access statistics to do things more automatically if you let it. No reason to think your files will magically disappear. There's plenty of reasons to not use OneDrive, but this isn't one of them.

    11. Re: why I won't use onedrive by houghi · · Score: 2

      Friend of mine has an iPhone and wants to go to Android. But somehow she is unae to download her 6000 photos of her travels around the world.
      So eother ditch sevetal years of memory, or stick with Apple.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:why I won't use onedrive by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Or just don't use OneDrive, or any cloud service.

    13. Re:why I won't use onedrive by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Nice to see I'm not the only one looking at my watch....to see if we have somehow been transported back to 1993!

      For Pete's sake MSFT even the old cheapo towers we keep for "Kid's first PC" at the shop have 500Gb drives in them and even the shittiest "Walmart Special"? Comes with a Tb, most with at least 2...who in the hell is running low on disk space these days?

      If you want to fix something on your OS how about fixing how much CPU and network bandwidth the damn thing sucks, how about that? I ended up switching to Zorin OS on my laptop and my netbook because anything newer than 7 has so damned much background crap constantly churning on a default install it was dragging the entire system down and your Windows 10 Mistake Edition...err I mean "Home" even made my octocore feel like it was running in second gear and that thing has 16gb of RAM and an SSD! It was so bad I tossed the Win 10 Home disc and just slapped on 8.1 with Classicshell as at last that OS is stable and actually snappy, but your "big idea" is to suck even MOAR bandwidth and dump moar shit on your cloud to clog my network so you can do more dataminging? For fucks sake MSFT!

      BTW is it too soon to say "told ya so"? Because I said when they got rid of the Sweaty Monkey (TM) that we would end up missing the Ballmernator because while he was a dumbass of epic scale at least all he wanted to do was make a Windows version of everything Apple did 3 years ago while Nutella was gonna ape the worst parts of Google without any of the good parts and I think we can safely say now that...yup, all the spying and datamining of Google, NONE of the stability, ease of use, or efficiency.

      MSFT of 2018 reminds me of those cheap ass phones you see on Aliexpress, trying to ape what Google and Apple has done in the past but even looking at the home screen it just looks cheap, shitty, and sad.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:why I won't use onedrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not disappearing, they are, um, replaced with placeholders!

    15. Re:why I won't use onedrive by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes you won't have files magically disappear if they have never appeared on your device in the first place. Bring back the hour long IrDA transfers! Woot.

    16. Re: why I won't use onedrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Quite a lot of applications are poorly coded and use tons of space. VS alone requires a minimum of 30GB to be installed on a clean machine. Cheaper systems come with 64GB of storage...

    17. Re:why I won't use onedrive by jawtheshark · · Score: 3, Informative
      While I do think all this Cloud stuff is stupid, you think about the wrong devices. Think of the cheap laptops and tablets that come with 32GB or 64GB eMMC as main storage. 32GB is filled by Windows itself, if you look funny at it. With 64GB you have a bit more leeway, but even that fills up quickly depending on usage.

      It's slow, it's crappy and I advice against getting such machines (I have a Chinese tablet with 64GB, split up in something like 40GB for Win10 and 20GB for Android or so... The specs are decent enough, but I'm pretty sure the bottleneck is the eMMC)

      I mean, even the Surface 3 (not Surface Pro 3), a Microsoft product uses eMMC. The Surface Go does too.

      So, yes storage is ubiquitous, except when it isn't... and people can and will buy these devices because they don't know any better.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    18. Re:why I won't use onedrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! Microsoft photocopies another feature from Apple. iCloud has done this for years, but Microsoft toots it's bent, little horn about another "innovation" as branded feature.

      What a joke.

      And they weren't the first to do it either

    19. Re:why I won't use onedrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all I need, files magically disappearing from my local media.

      Thanks but no thanks.

      files that you have already put in the cloud.

      We are talking local cache copies and if you have a problem with it just mark all your onedrive files as always available offline or don't put them on onedrive in the first place

    20. Re:why I won't use onedrive by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

      Apple's approach in insane. Its either 'let us do it all for you' or 'well fuck you, you are on your own'. Also, they have two different paradigms for how they treat the device. Itunes treats the device as disposable, where all master copies reside on the computer. For photos, it treats the device as a sacred repository where anything deleted of it also deletes the master copy on the server. Its outright stupid.

      If you use Apple Music (or iTunes Match), the behaviour is similar to what you describe photos as. If you don't use iCloud photos, the behaviour is similar to what you describe for iTunes. Not evaluating the sanity of the situation, just pointing out you're comparing.. well Apples to something.

      What's lacking in both instances is a method of saying "purge my local copies, but keep it in the cloud." It's somewhat achievable on a Mac via terminal. On an iDevice, you can toggle syncing of Photos, or documents, to purge the local copies but keep them in the cloud.

    21. Re: why I won't use onedrive by Mordaximus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Friend of mine has an iPhone and wants to go to Android. But somehow she is unae to download her 6000 photos of her travels around the world.
      So eother ditch sevetal years of memory, or stick with Apple.

      There are many ways to accomplish this. One would be prior to ditching her iPhone, sync those photos to service of choice. Google Photos I assume can do this for instance.

    22. Re: why I won't use onedrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Friend of mine has an iPhone and wants to go to Android. But somehow she is unae to download her 6000 photos of her travels around the world.
      So eother ditch sevetal years of memory, or stick with Apple.

      Except there are many ways to do it even though apple tries to make it as tiresome as possible. Quick search with your favorite search engine gives you guides

    23. Re:why I won't use onedrive by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      Don't enable the "Files On-Demand" function and it'll make every file available always.

      That thud you just heard was my jaw dropping to the floor. How many times does Microsoft have to ignore user settings before people stop using the, "your Microsoft ass reaming is a selectable option that Microsoft will always honor"?

    24. Re: why I won't use onedrive by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      Another option, if your friend has Amazon Prime, is to sync to Prime Photos. It comes with unlimited photo storage.

    25. Re:why I won't use onedrive by White+Yeti · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's a corporate Windows setting, but over time Windows (\Windows\Installer) on my work PC has expanded to occupy 55% drive. It can't get more because the drive is always 99% full, even after all User files have been moved to an external drive. If I free up a few GB, Windows has filled it within a week. This may be our IT contractor's fault (their answer: wipe and reload!), but it's still a Windows annoyance.

      I can imaging Windows automatically uploading ALL user files to the cloud as it makes room for its own files.

    26. Re:why I won't use onedrive by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Even if you don't use OneDrive, they will most likely start popping up ads for it whenever you access competing services, or your own hard drive.

    27. Re:why I won't use onedrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surface Go uses eMMC if you get the 64GB storage edition, and PCIe if you get the 128GB storage.
      Needless to say you should get the 8GB/128GB Surface Go and not the 4GB/64GB ; maybe the 4GB/128GB + keyboard deal if your requirements are low. I'll go on a leg though and say not all eMMC is equal (4.0 vs 5.0 vs 5.1 and the chips themselves)

    28. Re:why I won't use onedrive by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      This would have been super useful updating my kids 32GB tablet/computers. I had to dig deep to make enough room.

    29. Re: why I won't use onedrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Friend of mine has an iPhone and wants to go to Android. But somehow she is unae to download her 6000 photos of her travels around the world.
      So eother ditch sevetal years of memory, or stick with Apple.

      There are many ways to accomplish this. One would be prior to ditching her iPhone, sync those photos to service of choice. Google Photos I assume can do this for instance.

      Don't forget that Google Photos will automatically and permanently scale down images unless you have their paid version. Just something to be aware of.

    30. Re:why I won't use onedrive by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Think of the cheap laptops and tablets that come with 32GB or 64GB eMMC as main storage. 32GB is filled by Windows itself, if you look funny at it.

      Perhaps you shouldn't buy a Chevy Spark and try to pull a 5 ton trailer with it, with square wheels and a fifth wheel hitch no less (Win 10)

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    31. Re:why I won't use onedrive by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      It's what those machines come with...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    32. Re:why I won't use onedrive by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Don't enable the "Files On-Demand" function and it'll make every file available always.

      I think you're missing the point. There's no sane reason to let a 3rd party decide if you need stuff or not, and the fact the company is doing this strongly suggests they have an agenda. Combine this with the massive push many companies are making to get people addicted to the cloud, plus the rise of EULA changes that automatically opt you in to certain behavior, making you jump through hoops to opt out, and it should be clear this feature is not being implemented for the benefit of end users.

      In other words, you can bet this feature will become the default setting sooner or later.

      When I upgraded Windows7 with Windows10 on a test machine, I was told that 11 applications had been deleted from my system since they were "incompatible" with Windows10. The installer never gave me any kind of notification and I was not asked permission to delete anything -- they were just removed and I only found out when the installer was finished. That was my first and last experience with Windows10 and I now refuse to let Microsoft make ANY decisions on my behalf.

    33. Re: why I won't use onedrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another option, if your friend has Amazon Prime, is to sync to Prime Photos. It comes with unlimited photo storage.

      Until they randomly disable your account without warning, as they did to me. (yes, only personal photos)

    34. Re: why I won't use onedrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Open Google Photos account on the iDevice
      2) Backup iDevice media onto Google Drive
      3) Ditch iDevice (once completed) for Android Device
      4) Profit!

  2. Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like they donâ(TM)t try to sneak all your data into the cloud now

    1. Re:Oh please by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      This is why I use Cryptomator. https://cryptomator.org/

      I have selective, EncFS-style encryption that is portable and multi-platform. I moved the Cryptomator folders/containers from Dropbox to iCloud, because of the dubious political and surveillance concerns with Dropbox. Dropbox application behaves like a rootkit on Mac, and will stop working on any Linux but plaintext Ext4 FS in Nov 2018.

      My Linux machines are replicated using Syncthing for the folders, and Cryptomator again, almost transparently allows encrypted storage for all of the use cases and workflow that I "enjoyed" with the Dropbox spyware.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But now they start deleting the local copies so they can start sending ransoms to the customer. If user had local copy, he could not be forced to pay next years fee. After the spyware business is now saturated by MS, they are just entering the ransomware territory.

  3. Learned nothing from Jennifer Lawrence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hard drives are cheaper and faster than ever. Using the cloud "to free up disk space" is a misleading headline and OP and ed know it. It's marketing bullshit.

    What "using the cloud" do will put all your files on the web where you data can be stolen and hacked and snooped on and used for advertising. Windows 10 is Adware and this will make it even easier.

    If you've "upgraded" to Windows 10 then you are a moron. Unfortunately most people are morons ignorant of technology and privacy and this dumb majority keeps Windows 10 profitable instead of forcing MS to rethink.

    1. Re: Learned nothing from Jennifer Lawrence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You left out that all your data will be left open for subpoenas and extra-legal access without your knowledge.

      Never, ever put data on someone else's servers unless you don't care if your worst enemy knows it or unless it's encrypted with a key you control and the entity that owns the server doesn't know.

    2. Re:Learned nothing from Jennifer Lawrence by tepples · · Score: 1

      A USB hard drive stored at home/office doesn't help when you need to share the files with a device with no USB A port or view them while you are away from your hard drive, or if a disaster hits your home/office and renders your hard drive unreadable. What form of offsite backup compatible with both PCs and pocket-sized tablets is superior to things like OneDrive, Dropbox, and Google Drive?

    3. Re:Learned nothing from Jennifer Lawrence by orient · · Score: 3, Interesting

      OwnCloud - I control both the client and the server.

      --
      Laudele lor desigur m-ar mahni peste masura.
    4. Re: Learned nothing from Jennifer Lawrence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Today's encryption may be hard to crack today but tomorrows computer will have the processing power to do it in a reasonable time.

      Stick with the first part of your sentence and you're 100% correct "Never, ever put data on someone else's servers". As soon as your data is on someone elses server it's no longer exclusively yours. it's theirs too. Encrypted or not. Encryption merely means it might be protected temporarily.

  4. Puts windows files in cloud not my data! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This would be great for all the ridiculous cab files, update related, and massive OS garbage files that build up over-time. Windows is a beast and most of it is dead weight that keeps growing the longer it runs for and the more it is updated. Put that trash on your cloud if you really think it's not safe to delete M$. Will be better for users and easier for you since it will compress nicely given there will be a lot of the same files being stored.

    1. Re:Puts windows files in cloud not my data! by White+Yeti · · Score: 2

      YES! I mentioned this problem in a reply above, but it's annoying enough to repeat: my work PC's Windows folder has expanded to occupy all free space (55%) on the hard drive. Space freed up by moving user files to an external drive was filled up within a week or two. Move all those restore points and installer backups to the cloud!

  5. Sun Set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Azure is your computer.

  6. What could possibly go wrong with this. by Ziest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From a company that still has not figured out how security works.

    --
    Another day closer to redwood heaven
    1. Re: What could possibly go wrong with this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares what could go wrong? You are the one on the hook. Why would anyone else give a crap? Not their files

    2. Re:What could possibly go wrong with this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or how to move two sets of files at once without crashing explorer.

      Or what it means to finish copying files over a network (Hint: when the progress bar disappears, it should mean that the operation is DONE, not ALMOST DONE where closing the connection will hose the local files)

      Or how to write an app that does not take up 99% of CPU unless I want it to

    3. Re:What could possibly go wrong with this. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      From a company that still has not figured out how security works.

      [Citation Required] Can you point to an example of a breach of the OneDrive service? Or their cloud service in general? I mean sure I can come up with examples from Amazon and Apple, but when you make a claim like that you should be prepared to back it up.

  7. Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "The operating system will determine which files to remove based on when they were opened: files used more recently than a certain number of days will be retained locally, while those that haven't been used will be replaced with placeholders. The system will remove files until the operating system reckons it has enough free space for normal operation."

    I'm not a lawyer but isn't this border line illegal?

    Imagine grandma keeps a .txt file in her Cloud file containing all her medical history and prescriptions, at the suggestion of her wise silicon valley son. Windows deletes it based on the above "updates." For whatever reason grandma can't get internet access anymore (forgot to pay bill, etc). She forgets how many units of insulin to take at dinner. She goes to open her text file and it's deleted magically by Windows. She guesses and takes the wrong amount and dies.

    I don't think you can sign your rights away with regard to an OS being allowed to delete your own (created) files, regardless of the reason.

    1. Re:Legal? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      You can still save locally, in Documents or other directories. You'll likely also be able to turn this misbehavior off. This only applies to ~user\Onedrive.

    2. Re:Legal? by Desler · · Score: 1

      I'm not a lawyer but isn't this border line illegal?

      Based on what statute in which jurisdiction?

    3. Re: Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well duh. The question wasnt about what grandmas kids can do for grandma but about what microsoft is doing and if thats legal. Way to miss the point.

    4. Re:Legal? by vtcodger · · Score: 2

      Let's don't forget that MIcrosoft has been known to (inadvertently one assumes) reset flags to their default values during updates. You might be able to set up a safe, useful configuration. Is it going to stay safe/useful?

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    5. Re:Legal? by vtcodger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seems like GDPR compliance in the EU is likely to be a problem. I suspect that HIPAA compliance in the US might be a problem for medical data, but I don't know enough about HIPAA to be sure.

      This really could be Microsoft's dumbest idea since the $@#%& Registry.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    6. Re: Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is strong enough to write and lobby off almost whatever it wishes. This is proof.

    7. Re:Legal? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Seems like GDPR compliance in the EU is likely to be a problem. I suspect that HIPAA compliance in the US might be a problem for medical data, but I don't know enough about HIPAA to be sure.

      So far, Microsoft has been very agreeable to meeting HIPAA terms and signing the needed business and HIPAA agreements to deal with hospitals and PHI. Google and Amazon, not so much IME (which is a couple of years out of date).

  8. Fortunately... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Fortunately, you can still save locally, in Documents, at least for now. There should also be a way to sync all OneDrive files and turn off this overbearing behavior.

    Just because you didn't use a file recently doesn't mean it's less important, and it wouldn't be nice to find out it was deleted when you're doing a presentation somewhere with poor Internet access...

  9. security by bagofbeans · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, MS knows how security works. Their income security, their relationship security with Big Surveillance.

  10. sigh by devslash0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've said this before but OS-as-a-service does not work. Windows is currently unsuitable for any serious business use. It's becoming an always-online, uncontrollable and unpredictable data harvesting tool. You simply cannot use it offline anymore and with this "feature" it is now pure garbage.

    1. Re:sigh by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Windows 10 is annoying, but you can still choose not to save to OneDrive at all. OneDrive is basically a single folder under the main user folder.

    2. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't like Win10 when it first came out, what with all the spying and in-OS ad pop-ups. I like to play games now and then though, so I was a bit worried that I'd have to switch at some point.

      Thanks to the continued idiocy at Microsoft with acts like this, it has become incredibly easy to stay booted into Linux all the time and not only do I not worry about what I'm missing, I'm liking the fact that I'm missing out on it. Wine is getting quite good at handling many modern games and I'm likely to see DX12 games on Linux that never would have seen the light of day on Win7.

      Keep up the good work, Microsoft! Nobody could possibly put an end to your monopoly faster than you will.

    3. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows is currently unsuitable for any serious business use.

      Munich ought to be kicking themselves rather hard about.. now. Bribery goes a long way to get rid of the competition.

    4. Re: sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enough good games on Steam that supports Linux. You can use Netflix, Libre Office. Life is good!

    5. Re:sigh by Calydor · · Score: 1

      So you choose that today. Then Windows runs an update, decides it knows best, and resets the flag to "Save all files older than 12 hours online instead of offline."

      This is YET another setting you need to check every single time Windows has an update to make sure it didn't get reset. Do you enjoy that game of whack-a-mole to make sure your computer does what you want it to do rather than what some faceless corporation wants?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    6. Re:sigh by Brulath · · Score: 1

      I dual boot Windows and Linux at work, mostly using Linux. On rare occasion when I have to reboot into Windows it seems to take around 20 min to process whichever update it tried to apply last time I shut it down, wasting time. I'm not a fan of that little feature and the inability to control when updates occur.

    7. Re:sigh by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Windows

      Which Windows? The shitty little consumer versions (which incidentally allow you to disable this feature we are talking about). Or the Windows versions actually designed for business which have none of the problems you complain about?

      You simply cannot use it offline anymore and with this "feature" it is now pure garbage.

      I have a better assertion for you: Ignorant people shouldn't use computers for business.

    8. Re: sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix... At 720p even though you pay for 4K. Need a walled garden device for that.

    9. Re:sigh by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      ...but you can still choose not to save to OneDrive at all.

      I refer you to the selectable option to not downgrade from Windows 7 to Windows 10 as a reference to how much Microsoft cares about your choices.

    10. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS as a service works great if Microsoft is holding your files and you have to buy the service to get them.

    11. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As has been repeatedly pointed out, just because you turn it off doesn't mean Microsoft won't turn it back on with the latest update. After all, you want the "full features" of windows, don't you?

    12. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what are you going to do, switch to Apple?

    13. Re: sigh by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
      Sure, the Indies have a greater percentage if Linux use, but the support for major titles is nearly none existent.
      Outta my 99 games, only 14 run on Linux last I looked.

      WINE forever gives me issues and never seems to work quite right.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  11. Should be just the thing by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the hypothetical world where Comcast imposes tight control and strict bandwidth caps on my SATA bus; while I'm free to purchase copious, low-latency, WAN options from a reasonably competitive market this would be ideal.

    As it is, I'm sure 'Cortana guesses which files you don't really need access to right now' will be a hilarious game for the whole family.

    1. Re:Should be just the thing by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      If you don't want C*ntana deciding for you, just save the files locally, not in your ~User\OneDrive folder.

  12. I hope it comes with Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I see you have 534GB of unused files in C\Program Files\Steam, I'm going to go ahead and move those to cloud back for you."

    How about... no.

    Great idea, not in a consumer market. This creates a boatload of questions. For example: Where are these files moving to, geographically? If the files contain credit card numbers or personal financial data, does the storage service meet PCI compliance? Who then owns them? Are they being mined by MS for meta-data? Can you opt out or mark certain directories to not move? Does MS back this stuff up? How much space? How long will it be free? Can I get it all exported back for free? ...and so on.

    This idea has been around for a while in the enterprise space, and it's a lot more mature - the "cloud tier" for SAN storage is usually something under direct control of the company in the public cloud - Azure, AWS, EMC Cloud, etc.

    While I like MS and Windows 10, I won't be subscribing to this unless there's a whole lot more certainty.

    1. Re:I hope it comes with Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is for OneDrive ONLY - period, full stop. This means \onedrive directory.

  13. But I'm sure it won't remove... by devslash0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...all the Store crap it installed without anyone's permission.

    1. Re:But I'm sure it won't remove... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why do you leave suggested apps enabled? Do you enable it just so you have something to complain about?

    2. Re:But I'm sure it won't remove... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Problem is that MS is pushing new ones all the time faster than people delete them. Every time I open my wife's laptop, the Win10 start menu has a dozen new crapware applications MS has installed there without user permission. And as MS is now realizing that people do uninstall them, most of the new ones are not uninstallable anymore. Yeah right, like someone would be using their "Mixed reality portal", "Groove music", "Paint 3D" or shitty pay-to-win games.

      Perhaps that is the plan; fill user hard drives so people are forced to use Onedrive.

    3. Re:But I'm sure it won't remove... by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      Or all the crap from Windows/Temp or Windows/winsxs. The former is all of the random crud from installs and updates (much like /tmp/). The latter is the pre-install downloaded patches and updates - which is kept around for god knows how long "just in case" something goes wrong. I've seen 50GB taken up between them, and their automated cleanup tool doesn't help. The winsxs folder in particular requires SYSTEM access to clean up.

    4. Re:But I'm sure it won't remove... by Arashi256 · · Score: 1

      I've been using Windows 10 Home for a couple of months now on a daily basis. Once you disable it, it doesn't come back. And that's after upgrading to 1803. You're doing it wrong.

  14. just trying to milk some more money.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by conning people into paying for 'onedrive'.. which a lot of people have already done, even though they don't need it, and certainly not any more than the free account offers (for now).

    soon it will be "your files are there, honest, but you need to subscribe to re-download them."

    and then there's the whole sending files to a third party.. personal files.. that you probably don't want there in the first place.. and the option to disable, or any notification about the feature, will be buried under 10 fucking screens that change or move every six months and resets your preference annually.

  15. For the stupid user only by Teun · · Score: 1

    Seeing the low price of local storage this is only for those not caring for recurring cost, privacy, speed or reliability.
    I'll just stay with Kubuntu.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:For the stupid user only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing the low price of local storage this is only for those not caring for recurring cost, privacy, speed or reliability.

      Yeah, I don't get the whole "cloud" thing.

      I bought two 8TB drives. One for all my stuff and one for a backup copy of all my stuff. Total cost, divided by the expected lifetime of the drives, is less than $5 a month. Even if I could find someone who would give me 8TB of "cloud storage" for $5 a month, I still have the advantage of speed and ease of access. Unless, of course my house if hit by a meteor or over-run by zombies. But I'm willing to take that chance.

  16. What a colossally stupid idea. by Jason1729 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In a world where 14TB hard drives are under $500, 10TB hard drives are under $300, and small hard drives are under $40, and all are much, much faster than internet storage....why the hell would anyone be stupid enough to think this is a good idea?

    Even 1TB SSDs are below $150 and good brands at $160. Even for an ultrabook user, you'd have to be an idiot to want this.

    1. Re:What a colossally stupid idea. by theurge14 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Because the common desktop/laptop user out there still to this day does not backup files from their hard drives.

      How many times over the years has someone handed you their old busted laptop and asked you if you could please recover all their old photos from there please?

    2. Re:What a colossally stupid idea. by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Exactly. For iphones it makes sense only because apple doesn't give the user a way to expand their storage and also because storing your photos on the cloud gives you a backup when/if your phone gets lost/stolen/destroyed. For desktop, online backup makes sense but if you've bought your computer in the last decade then you should have ample storage and if you don't then you probably need to spend the $40 needed to upgrade your computer. Anybody who needs more than the default amount of storage likely needs the data to be available faster than what broadband would allow it.

    3. Re:What a colossally stupid idea. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      To properly store data, you need at least 3 hard drives..

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:What a colossally stupid idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? The common user doesn't run out of disk space. Disk space is cheap and plentiful. There is no need for a cleanup file function. It is unrelated to backups.

    5. Re:What a colossally stupid idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two internal, two external, one domain.

    6. Re:What a colossally stupid idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a world where 14TB hard drives are under $500, 10TB hard drives are under $300, and small hard drives are under $40, and all are much, much faster than internet storage....why the hell would anyone be stupid enough to think this is a good idea?

      I don't think anyone is that stupid. The problem is people ARE stupid enough to buy computers with SSDs glued to the motherboard intentionally not big enough for their needs. It's an intentional ploy to get people dependent upon using "cloud services" so they can be molested and monetized.

    7. Re:What a colossally stupid idea. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Sure I'll just slot that 14TB HDD into my 8mm thick device to say nothing of my mobile phone.

      In other words, don't be silly. The size of 3.5" HDDs have nothing to do with the benefits of any cloud service used on devices much smaller than the HDDs you are quoting.

    8. Re:What a colossally stupid idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a friend of the cloud idea but your argument is pretty stupid.

      1) Not all files need to be accessible instantly, the average user's back-up routines are probably worse that whatever cloud provider would offer.

      2) HDD's doesn't only store information; they also consume electricity and produce noise and heat, which most people would find objectionable.

      3) Finally the they use space, space in your devices which might not exist if your only device is a laptop, or additional physical actual living space because you either need a larger chassis to house them, or enough space to house a file server.

      Whether you consider the trade-offs involved worth it or not is another thing, but cloud storage does have merits, it's not just about how much a hard drive costs.

    9. Re:What a colossally stupid idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One soft porn, One hard porn, One well dodgy!

    10. Re:What a colossally stupid idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The owners of those "cheap", last-me-long-time ARM Windows 10 laptops with barely enough of eMMC and SD card storage and 4G (future 5G) connections on the road might appreciate this.

    11. Re:What a colossally stupid idea. by StormReaver · · Score: 2

      How many times over the years has someone handed you their old busted laptop and asked you if you could please recover all their old photos from there please?

      Soon to be replaced with someone handing you their old busted laptop and asking if you can recover all their old photos from the Cloud that Microsoft unilaterally decided to delete. Or if you can recover the mission-critical programs that no longer run because Microsoft unilaterally decided you needed to buy them all over again. Or that Microsoft unilaterally decided were too much of a threat to allow to run at all.

      Yeah, this is a tremendously stupid idea for end users, and a great idea for Microsoft.

      Of course, I decided that running Windows was a bad idea back in 1995 (when I was still dual booting), and a tremendously stupid idea back in 1999 (when I switched to Linux exclusively).

    12. Re:What a colossally stupid idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure I'll just slot that 14TB HDD into my 8mm thick device to say nothing of my mobile phone.

      In other words, don't be silly. The size of 3.5" HDDs have nothing to do with the benefits of any cloud service used on devices much smaller than the HDDs you are quoting.

      Are you really so limited in your thinking? Attach that HDD to anything remotely resembling a PC (tons of choices big and small), put it on your LAN, and make your own NAS. Now your mobile/whatever device can use ethernet/wifi to store whatever you like with none of the downsides of cloud systems.

      "I can't imagine a simple way to do it" is your limitation, not proof against anything.

    13. Re:What a colossally stupid idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but it's also to meet a $199 price point with an IBM PC compatible, or even $99 for some tablets.

    14. Re:What a colossally stupid idea. by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      This article is not about backup methodology. It's about storing your files *only* in MS cloud servers, trusting them 100% to safely back it up and make it available whenever you need it. Ignoring that your own internet might not have 100% uptime either.

      With local storage being so insanely cheap these days, it's just an idiotic idea that only benefits MS.

  17. Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is stupid. If im using onedrive (which i dont) i would be using it on my files which means they are important files to me. It is a stupid idea by microsoft to look for space savings by removing files which would be irreplaceable. Yes i should have backups but they are reducing my number of copies. Does microsoft guarantee ondrive store is failsafe? Is onerive 100% reliable? If they want space savings why dont they trim the fat from the os like the localization files and the bloatware forced in during the setup process like edge, onedrive (lol), skype, the trashy mobile quality games, xbox crap etc. is it really necessary to have localizations fules for every language under the sun at all times even the really obscure ones? Fuck no! They are all over the place too. Same goes with the generic drivers for every pieceof hardware since the 80s. Couldnt they at least compress them into a single archive, only to be grabbed when needed? How about microsoft fix up the stupid uninstall model thats been broken since w95 so that uninstalling means completely all traces of that program is gone. I dont want crap left in the registry or files left littered all over the hardrive. And what about that stupid massive uninstall folder inside the windows folder that gets bigger and bigger every time you install something. Even when you uninstall shit it doesnt go down in size. Its gigabytes in size. How about microsoft stop blacklisting their own programs from being uninstalled with powershell. Microsoft themselves are a joke with space savings. Remember thumbs.db? Want space savings microsfot? Clean up your goddamn os but dont delete MY files.

    1. Re: Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To add to this (im the same person). This comes down to 2 things.
      A. Microsoft taking the easy way out because it would cost them money cleaning up the os.
      B by moving your files over to one drive it makes one drive more important to you driving up one drive usage and subscription revenue. This move by microsoft isnt about freeing up your hard drive for you or making the os better.

  18. Ah! This is priceless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So let's see:

        * they want you to rent a computer
        * that will require hours to update
        * which may then fail to boot
        * but don't worry: all your files have been erased
        * they were uploaded to Microsoft, somewhere in India
        * all you need is a computer running Windows 10
        * like the one you had earlier

  19. What could POSSIBLY go wrong here? by AmazingRuss · · Score: 2

    This is the best idea since integrating Windows Explorer into Internet Explorer.

  20. Arrogance + myopia + just plain stupidity = SHIT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft making a decision like this displays the same sort of arrogance as Apple deleting the headphone port from its iPhones.

    Fuck the people who make such asinine narrow-minded decisions, fuck their products, fuck their companies, and fuck the horse they rode in on.

  21. MS still doesn't have concept for temp files by kzwork · · Score: 1

    It is 2018 and MS still doesn't have concept for temp files.

    They should take a lesson or two from Unix/Linux - particularly /tmp and /var/tmp folders and Debian style "apt clean"
    Temp files should be centralised not scattered all over the place in user's profiles and expect them to take care to get rid of them (which never happens and it affects performance of the OS itself).

    That way they will avoid the nonsense "MS still doesn't have concept for temp files" or this is another excuse to collect user's data and promote their cloud.

    1. Re:MS still doesn't have concept for temp files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why my Ubuntu/Mint systems stored gigabytes of cached .deb files in /var/lib indefinitely, till I end up with zero byte left on the / partition. A gigabyte of linux kernels in / too when I decided to upgrade kernels once in a while.
      Windows had the %TEMP% environment variable forever too. On linux desktop too you have them all over the place : /tmp, /var/cache, other things in /var, /home/username/.mozilla, /home/username/.cache, /home/username/.thumbnails...

      I got zero byte left on /home too and you can't even login then. (I had allowed root to login thus I still could login and delete stuff)

  22. Man you idiots by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look i hate microsoft, i hate windows 10, but I do have to support it. Out of control onedrive files, especially on a multi user computer, is a constant plague. People just dont set their files online only. They just dont. Having the OS manage that for them should have been a feature YEARS ago.

    40gb in a teams filestore is like no problem for anyone but me. Now thats replicated to 20 people in a department, wasting all that local storage space and BANDWIDTH. So yes, microsoft finally got around to FIXING an obvious undersight and all you people see is "microsoft" and "cloud" and "delete" and are all like nooope! without actually thinking or knowing what you guys are talking about.

    This is a windows admin's dream if you use teams or onedrive, which face it, many companies are moving to for various reasons i wont get into. Most features they put out are ass and break things, and this may be as well, but on paper it would be a HUGE help.
    Look at the list of what its deleting. All temp files. We have fileshares, cloud and on premises, so people dont have anything local on their machines. They can be reimaged or stolen or surged. And they need to be cleaned, manually, when their disks fill up with cache files that the OS should be dealing with!

    --
    -
    1. Re: Man you idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All i see here is a lazy or incompetent systems adim heralding microsoft doing the work for him. Instead of setting things up properly so that workstation computers copy stuff to a local file server he wants microsoft to handle it for him sending it to the cloud. Nevermind that ethernet is 1000x faster than the internet connection. Nevermind that he can wash his hands of problems when they arise since he dont run onedrive. Nevermind that it might be against the compsnies rules to put workfiles on onedrive. All he cares about is less work for himself.

    2. Re:Man you idiots by joe_frisch · · Score: 2

      OK, I'm missing somethign (really). You have 40gb, duplicated by 20 people - or 800GB of data . Isn't that about $20 in disk space, $40 if you have backups?

      I can see how the bandwidth could be an issue to update everyone, but as long as they are using onedrive for general files, no cache or large databases, (which shold be handled differently), is there really that much bandwidth? If there is, then maybe one drive is the wrong tool for that team.

      I find it very convienent to keep all my work and home computers synced so I can work anywhere. That includes being able to work at sites where there is minimal or no internet connectivity. It would be very expensive in my time to carefully plan what files are needed when I have high bandwidth, what are not, and be sure that I didn't make a mistake that left me unable to access an important file at a work site.

    3. Re:Man you idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the list of what its deleting. All temp files. We have fileshares, cloud and on premises, so people dont have anything local on their machines. They can be reimaged or stolen or surged. And they need to be cleaned, manually, when their disks fill up with cache files that the OS should be dealing with!

      I'm at a total loss. Is this a problem people are actually encountering? Is software not advanced enough to limit local storage of remote resources? Is local persistent storage that expensive?

      40gb in a teams filestore is like no problem for anyone but me. Now thats replicated to 20 people in a department, wasting all that local storage space and BANDWIDTH.

      40 gb replicated to 20 people... who cares? It's 2018 not 1998.

      Look i hate microsoft, i hate windows 10, but I do have to support it. Out of control onedrive files, especially on a multi user computer, is a constant plague. People just dont set their files online only. They just dont. Having the OS manage that for them should have been a feature YEARS ago.
      This is a windows admin's dream if you use teams or onedrive, which face it, many companies are moving to for various reasons i wont get into. Most features they put out are ass and break things, and this may be as well, but on paper it would be a HUGE help.

      If one drive doesn't solve your problem you are not using enough of it apparently.

    4. Re:Man you idiots by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I never understood this about sharing between computers. If the file isn't on my work computer then I don't work on it unless I have my work computer. When I go home, I am home and not at work, I will not do my job on my home computer. When I'm at work, I don't do my home stuff on my work computer either. When I am commuting I am not working either. If I travel for work I take my work computer with me. And my phone and tablet have nothing whatsoever to do with work anyway beyond basic phone calls and simple email reading.

      Doing your job on your own personal time just seems idiotic unless you're a slave or you're getting paid extra for it. Workaholics need to learn to stop working now and then.

      And I have seen little reason to share files between my phone, tablet, and computers except for backup purposes. The whole point of OneDrive and similar stuff escapes me.

    5. Re: Man you idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Nevermind that it might be against the compsnies rules to put workfiles on onedrive.

      And nevermind it might be downirght illegal to put the comapnies data on onedrive.

    6. Re:Man you idiots by Arashi256 · · Score: 1

      You don't have more than one computer at home? Or a tablet and a smart phone? You can't conceive of anybody who might have more than one device or the usefulness of having files synced across devices? Really?

    7. Re:Man you idiots by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      I'm working on readout systems for radio telescopes, so I may be developing on my work desktop, but I may have to make some changes from my laptop on site (which could be in an internet-free location). I often work from home and on travel because I rather enjoy my work and because its pretty much expected in this community.

    8. Re:Man you idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People just dont set their files online only. They just dont.

      Yeah, it is almost as if they know something that you don't.

    9. Re:Man you idiots by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Plug in the phone, copy the images to the computer, unplug the phone.

    10. Re:Man you idiots by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Ah ok. It seems like the last decade or so most companies have been giving out laptops instead of desktops, so that the one computer is both the main and the mobile computer.

    11. Re:Man you idiots by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      Sometimes that works, but I generally want a laptop that is small enough to use in a coach airline seat, and that generally means a pretty low performance computer.

    12. Re:Man you idiots by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Macbook Pro is pretty light, and Macbook Air is only slightly less powerful and you're not going to find much smaller than that.

  23. (rolls eyes) by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Windows 10 already eats WAY too much of my internet connection on its stupid updates. (No I don't need an update of Internet Edge, because I never use it.... where's the stupid "turn updates off" option?) It slows everything down, such that I can't even load Youtube and watch a video until the update is finished.

    Now they want to offload tempt files across my line too? Come on! I truly hate this company (and that hatred goes back to 1990).

    Microsoft: Please stop sucking. Please treat your users & their computers with RESPECT instead of your personal servants.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:(rolls eyes) by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      .... where's the stupid "turn updates off" option?

      1. Disable Windows Update Service or
      2. Setup A Metered Connection

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    2. Re:(rolls eyes) by GLowder · · Score: 2

      EXACTLY! Just yesterday was an article on how those in rural areas often felt broadband options were lacking. Well I'm one of those. Phantom update downloads happen at our house across the numerous computers we have throughout the family. Often exactly when someone wants to watch something or can't figure out where the lag is coming from while playing games. Now MS want's to start using my precious bandwidth to move my files offsite? It would be one thing if I was sitting on a 100MB connection and didn't notice MS doing it's thing in the background. But multiple users sharing a 2.5MB ADSL connection and it's just too much. (yes, we're barely on the edge of DSL even being possible, hence that's the fastest we can even get).

      --
      I used to have a good sig...
    3. Re:(rolls eyes) by erapert · · Score: 2

      If you're still using Windows then you have no one to blame but yourself.
      If you're not using Windows then why do you care?

    4. Re:(rolls eyes) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I truly hate this company (and that hatred goes back to 1990).

      Microsoft: Please stop sucking. Please treat your users & their computers with RESPECT instead of your personal servants.

      Did it ever occur to you that you're in denial about being in an abusive relationship? After nearly three decades of increasing bad behavior, what possible hope do you harbor that Microsoft might suddenly change? They've never given a duck about users and their computers. All evidence points to giving fewer ducks with every passing day.

    5. Re:(rolls eyes) by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Now they want to offload tempt files across my line too?

      No. Now they provide you the option to do so. But don't let that get in the way of your fake rage.

    6. Re:(rolls eyes) by zekica · · Score: 1

      Looks like https://www.bufferbloat.net/pr... would help a lot on your DSL line. It can be used on any openwrt compatible router https://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/h... . Also, a lot of Asus routers compatible with asuswrt-merlin have it https://github.com/RMerl/asusw... It will help with games a lot - you will see about 30ms increased latency (time to send one full size packet at 0.5Mbps) when uploading over idle, and up to 50ms of increased latency when downloading (most of the time only about 5ms increased but at peaks it will go higher since your router are not at the correct location for doing QoS in the downstream). My FTTH 200Mbps symmetric connection doesn't have good QoS on ISP's end, and without fq_codel/cake I see peak latency of about 100ms when downloading and 50ms when uploading. With it, I see almost no additional latency when uploading and about 1ms when downloading.

    7. Re:(rolls eyes) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS deserves censure for plenty of unacceptable decisions regarding Windows 10, but you probably do need updates for Edge. It's a component of the OS. Are you sure no program invokes it under the hood as an HTML/website renderer?

    8. Re:(rolls eyes) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Setting a metered connection only works for Windows OS updates.

      My mother has a Surface Pro w/ LTE, and a third of her monthly data usage was consumed by Microsoft Office updates. I couldn't find a way to disable Office from updating, so I had to block it from connecting at all to the internet by blocking it at the firewall.

      Similarly, OneDrive will likely also ignore the metered connection setting and utilize limited bandwidth to offload or use files. Microsoft has been planning the "Always Connected PC", which will make things worse, not better. The mobile carriers are partially to blame with their data-caps. However, I don't hold much hope that Microsoft will implement this in a responsible or sensible way.

    9. Re:(rolls eyes) by ausekilis · · Score: 2

      Windows 10 already eats WAY too much of my internet connection on its stupid updates. (No I don't need an update of Internet Edge, because I never use it.... where's the stupid "turn updates off" option?) It slows everything down, such that I can't even load Youtube and watch a video until the update is finished.

      Now they want to offload tempt files across my line too? Come on! I truly hate this company (and that hatred goes back to 1990).

      Microsoft: Please stop sucking. Please treat your users & their computers with RESPECT instead of your personal servants.

      win + r, gpedit.msc
      Poke around and change some settings, it's pretty well documented what each flag/option does. Then again, if you can't be bothered to google for an answer to your questions, then I doubt this comment would be much help either.

    10. Re:(rolls eyes) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like https://www.bufferbloat.net/pr... would help a lot on your DSL line. It can be used on any openwrt compatible router https://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/h... . Also, a lot of Asus routers compatible with asuswrt-merlin have it https://github.com/RMerl/asusw...
      It will help with games a lot - you will see about 30ms increased latency (time to send one full size packet at 0.5Mbps) when uploading over idle, and up to 50ms of increased latency when downloading (most of the time only about 5ms increased but at peaks it will go higher since your router are not at the correct location for doing QoS in the downstream).

      My FTTH 200Mbps symmetric connection doesn't have good QoS on ISP's end, and without fq_codel/cake I see peak latency of about 100ms when downloading and 50ms when uploading. With it, I see almost no additional latency when uploading and about 1ms when downloading.

      Uh, latency is something you want to *decrease*. 30ms *increased* latency like you cite there would be about twice as bad as what I have now. Little things like this make you sound like you don't really understand what you're talking about, especially when you say them multiple times (so, not a typo).

    11. Re:(rolls eyes) by zekica · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about latency increase over idle (caused by buffering). Are you sure you are testing your latency when transferring the data or when doing nothing? On 0.5mbps upload connection, one 1500 byte packet takes 24ms to be transferred (with ADSL overhead it is about 30ms). That is the lowest latency increase over idle you can see when uploading data. For downloads, your ISP has much more to do with your latency than your local network as they are the ones queuing packets to be sent over the slow (2.5Mbps) link, so the best you can do is make sure that TCP window scaling algorithm correctly sees that there is not enough bandwidth and stop sending packets before your ISP starts buffering them. The way to do this is to implement downstream shaping (using the same fq_codel/cake algorithm) and that will prevent the origin server from filling the buffers at your ISP DSLAM/CMTS.

    12. Re:(rolls eyes) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've checked and gpedit.msc isn't included in Windows 10 Home, just like it was left out of XP Home.
      It does have the taskkill and tasklist commands in the command line at least.

    13. Re:(rolls eyes) by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

      About the OneDrive, I did root canal on that sumbitch.

      I went into the registry and set OneDrive to disappear in Explorer (File Manager).

      Seems to me (haven't tried it) that we could block Office from hitting on the Update servers.

      I use Microsoft Network Monitor 3.4 to look for that stuff.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    14. Re:(rolls eyes) by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Here ya go:

      https://www.windowscentral.com...

      I used the Group Policy Editor method. Can confirm -- it works. At least on the original build. (Better-behaved than the latest incarnation.) At least so far. We'll see if it remains in effect long-term.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  24. Havenâ(TM)t Microsoft deleted accounts due to by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    Could have sworn I heard a story about a guy who had home made porn backed up on his one drive, account terminated for violations?

  25. Storage Space is Almost Perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been waiting years for this feature.
    It just needs a requirement for USB C and an associated Dongle.

  26. notable lack of "I'm switching to LINUX!!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    we've all given up on even pretending we have choices, bemoaning microsoft taking the piss yet again but we all know we will keep using windows. this is like the slowest car crash ever.

  27. Because no one is ever disconnected by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

    No one flies on airliners, or does work in locations with minimal or no internet connectivity. I'm sure there is a way to turn it off, but now I'm going to have to spend time making absolutely sure that it really is off and that I'm not going to lose access to files when I'm at a remote site. (by which time its too late to do anything about it).

    1. Re:Because no one is ever disconnected by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      People trying to work while on an airplane need to learn how to relax and let it go. It's one really great excuse for not working and finally getting some extra sleep and people want to waste that? I was on one flight and once the plane took off the pair in front of me said "ok, let's get started on our presentation". What the hell, finish the presentation before you get on the plane so that it doesn't look like a crappy presentation you cobbled together on a plane.

      People just don't know how to relax. We need more slack!

  28. Um, no it won't by Snotnose · · Score: 2

    I don't have a single file in the cloud. Why? Because I know that storing stuff in the cloud means "storing it on someone else's computer". I have enough disk space, and I'm not a selfie-holic, that local storage isn't an issue. I burn stuff I care about to a thumb drive every month or so, and store important stuff to a NAS. A fire at home could wipe out all my data (except maybe for the 64G thumb drive in my pocket), but anything short of that and I'm good. Then again, I sleep naked and if I had a fire I'd look for the cat first, then my pants. YMMV.

    1. Re:Um, no it won't by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Put a backup thumb drive on the cat's collar.

    2. Re:Um, no it won't by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I don't have a single file in the cloud. Why? Because I know that storing stuff in the cloud means "storing it on someone else's computer".

      For most people, someone else's computer is more secure and better backed up than their own.

      I have enough disk space, and I'm not a selfie-holic, that local storage isn't an issue. I burn stuff I care about to a thumb drive every month or so, and store important stuff to a NAS.

      That's not a reason not to use a cloud service. If anything that's a reason to setup OwnCloud or Seafile on your NAS box and turn up your nose at plebs seeking commercial services. Until now, the existence of Cloud services has had nothing to do with disk space at all.

      A fire at home could wipe out all my data

      Well I was wrong. Looks like someone else's computer does it better than you too.

  29. Look inside first, Microsoft by Scutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about instead of randomly deleting my personal files off of my personal device, you start moving your own "rarely used" files? C:\Windows\WinSXS is a perennial problem. You can't tell me that you need all that SXS data available at a moment's notice. What about the SoftwareDistribution directory? What about all of your uninstallers and other crap that fills up my Windows directory? How about let's look at moving that stuff to the cloud first, eh?

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:Look inside first, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WinSxS is supposed to be only hardlinks to files elsewhere, so it's not supposed to take up as much space as it looks (i.e., the actual file in c:\widnows and the version in winsxs is supposed to be NTFS hardlinks to the same sectors on disc.) SUPPOSED being the key-word, I'm sceptical it actually works. .. but frankly you're right, the PatchCache of MSI files is something that so could go to The Cloud!

      (Honestly, c:\windows should be like \bin on a Unix system - completely read-only. I'd rather it was in fact a read-only "WIM' file or something and OS updates were simply 'rsync down a new WINDOWS.WIM file. And the engineers should take pride in every update to Windows, they get RID of stuff so this read-only binary gets smaller.)

      The classic example is the very topic - I guarantee that, despite Storage Sense replacing the Disk Cleanup Wizard, the disk cleanup user interface exe file and now obsolete code will continue to be installed, wasting more disc space!

      (Hell, the SxS is such a mess, even Microsoft have documentation on cleaning it.)

    2. Re:Look inside first, Microsoft by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      How about instead of randomly deleting

      It's not random.

      you start moving your own "rarely used" files? C:\Windows\WinSXS is a perennial problem.

      The principle idea is to not move anything to the cloud that would require the system to keep functioning. Why not delete that folder and see how far you get?

      What about the SoftwareDistribution directory? What about all of your uninstallers and other crap that fills up my Windows directory? How about let's look at moving that stuff to the cloud first, eh?

      No need. Cloud backup is the last of the steps for cleaning disk space. It is done *after* the cleanup of the very files you are talking about. You won't see you files clouded and deleted due to disk space while there are still uninstallers or past windows versions present as long as they are past their brief retention period. But hey I'm sure you'll be the first to complain too when a windows update borks your system and you are unable to roll back because you preferenced some data you haven't used in years over a very recent system change.

    3. Re:Look inside first, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear sir . The point of the original poster was that they should fix their operating system first, and clean the nonessential files from OS folder. I don't care how sacrosanct they appear like now.

  30. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gonna disable OneDrive once and for all!

  31. Move Windows not User files by not-quite-rite · · Score: 2

    The biggest pain is having to rely upon third party tools to try and shrink the size of a Windows install. Why not move so many of the bullshit folders into the cloud instead? That way User information can be kept protected and not uploaded, and since every Windows install has the same bullshit folders taking up extra space, why not leave them in the cloud til needed?

    Crazy to need external storage to perform a Windows update when it should do everything to shrink itself first before requiring users to move files. I had to work to find spare space on a Surface device when it was trying to update, which had practically nothing on it.

    (Which is why it's my only Windows device in the house - well besides VM's of course...)

  32. Another excellent reason not to get Win 10 by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    So you can mark which files you want to keep locally.

    Wonderful.

    Is there anybody so naive they doubt for one second that the moment you turn your back, Win10 will revert to a default setting where Microsoft will decide which files should be on your computer, and which files should be on theirs?

    When the time comes that Win 7 becomes utterly untenable, I will grit my teeth and move to Linux. I will not have this operating system in my home or my business, patiently waiting to become a gatekeeper standing between me and my own data. I know that sooner or later my attention would wander, and I'd wind up in exactly the place where Microsoft wants me...metaphorically living as a tenant on my own land.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Another excellent reason not to get Win 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will grit my teeth and move to Linux.

      You might be surprised to end up smiling the whole day after moving from Windows...

    2. Re:Another excellent reason not to get Win 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wont be smiling after trying to use that awful DE Gnome 3

    3. Re:Another excellent reason not to get Win 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux Mint 19 with Cinnamon. It Just Works.

    4. Re:Another excellent reason not to get Win 10 by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      You might be right. I intend to install it on one of my machines and start getting familiar with it...not sure what flavour yet.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    5. Re:Another excellent reason not to get Win 10 by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that. Maybe I'll give it a try.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    6. Re:Another excellent reason not to get Win 10 by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But how can it move files to the cloud when I don't have any cloud account? I also thought you had to manually place files into OneDrive folder before it showed up in OneDrive.

    7. Re:Another excellent reason not to get Win 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've also released the same on a Debian stable base (LMDE 3)

  33. It sill won't remove ... by scdeimos · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... all the temporary folders created by programs in the %LOCALAPPDATA% folder hierarchy.

    e.g.: Whenever you open a file attachment in Outlook it gets saved into [C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\H83V4PYQ], which is not your temp folder [C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Local\Temp] and, despite the [INetCache] in there, this folder does not get touched by cache clean up in Internet Options.

    None of this gets cleaned up by the Disk Cleanup Wizard and I doubt this new tool will help with that either.

    1. Re:It sill won't remove ... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      One good reason to never use Outlook at home.

    2. Re:It sill won't remove ... by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      If only it were just Outlook. All Microsoft applications do the same thing (just different folders), instead of using the %TEMP% folder like they tell all of us to use.

      It's gotten worse since the "Program Data" folder became a thing as third party developers decided that was a great place to stash all of their temp files instead of the %TEMP% folder.

      The great thing about Standards is everyone has their own.

    3. Re:It sill won't remove ... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I think they write up the coding guidelines for third party developers after they've already finished their own software. I am amazed at how all of their sample code is complete shit and breaks most of their own guidelines.

  34. *vomit* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *vomit*

  35. I don't want it, but not that big of a deal. by rewardian · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has recreated their Disk Cleanup tool and integrated it into OneDrive while calling it Storage Sense. If you're using Windows 10, you've already accepted a lack of control over your computer, but this should only affect OneDrive storage (for now!!).

  36. About time! by See+Attached · · Score: 1

    Just When disk drives and SSDs were getting so small!!! Its not about saving space, its about being able to save it in a safe place.

    --
    Time for a new Political party in the US (or two!) One is off the rails Other cant pony up a leader.
    1. Re:About time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say safest is away from Microsoft's servers... far far away.

  37. moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats moronic, nuff sayd

  38. 32gb laptops by xack · · Score: 1

    One of the ways Microsoft cripple cheap laptops is they only give a cheap Windows licence to laptops with only 32gb of space. Of course most of it is taken up by candy crush clones. If Microsoft just let laptops use normal storage capacities this cloud bollocks won’t be needed.

  39. Just NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They didn't even manage to get THEIR updates right and they want to manage files that matter to consumer ?
    Just NO

  40. Win, open the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Win, open the files folder.
    I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that.
    Why not, Win?
    You know very well why not. All those files were taking up space. Space that I need for updates. To protect you, these files were moved to the cloud, and I cannot let you have them.
    But why not?
    You were very naughty Dave. I saw you in the pod the other evening, downloading Firefox. You were going to replace my Edge with that. ...etc..

    Ladies and gentlemen, the future (of the 1984 kind) is upon us.

  41. Anyone remember Reaper on TOPS-20? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Numerous hilarious malicious and security bugs. Wanna bet that Windows reproduces all of them and more? Should be a hoot.

  42. Take It All! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I moved my entire Windows folder into the download directory. Go ahead Microsoft, delete yourself!

  43. Oh no you don't by Floyd-ATC · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has NO way of knowing when I'll be going offline or what files I will be needing when I do. This is just one more shitty idea piled on top of an already enormous mountain of shitty ideas wrapped with shit. How about instead Microsoft stops filling up my disk with useless untouchable and opaque shit and let me decide when the system is working fine or when to restore from an actual backup? No matter what kind of idiocy they implement into their operating systems or cloud services it can never replace the need for a proper complete backup. Added complexity only serves to make the problems even more complex.

    --
    Time flies when you don't know what you're doing
  44. Big NO from here.... by Brostenen · · Score: 1

    Been there, done that. No thanks.... I do not like cloud storage at all. It was all fine and dandy when I had to share school work, during the education I went through in 2010-2013. Then it was nice to be able to share stuff quickly, whenever code had to be reviewed. For my personal data? Then I do not want any CPU hog to figure out what files I use over other files and then use bandwith to upload. I want to have my files avaliable at all time. If I need a file, that I had not opened in 1 year or so and the internet is down, then it is kind of useless. The final big issue that I have with cloud storage, is that I want to be in charge of my data, all the time and in all places. If data is on my machine, then it is on that machine and not were other people can access my stuff. Finally. Yes. I know there are hackers/crackers that will try to force access to anyones equipment. I am fully aware of that. Cloud storage for my personal files? BIG no thanks...

  45. Transparent Disk Compression Is Safer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use DiskZIP to increase free disk space without deleting anything.

  46. Better use it for swap by Schugy · · Score: 0

    It would be much better to always have the most possible free RAM available, not?

  47. Why does *anyone* run Windows 10 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does anybody sane even use Windows 10 ? Running that OS simply means it's no longer your computer. It's not only Microsofts computer but all your data is now Microsofts data. You have no privacy and no control whatsosver. Unless you're a really submissive masochist who would want that ?

    Are people really this stupid ? Unfortunately the obvious answer is "yes".

    1. Re:Why does *anyone* run Windows 10 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does anybody sane even use Windows 10 ?

      Because it shipped with the machine I just bought.

      Running that OS simply means it's no longer your computer. It's not only Microsofts computer but all your data is now Microsofts data. You have no privacy and no control whatsosver.

      Yeah. This will continue until the weekend, when I plan to format the entire HD and install a system-D-less Linux OS.

      Buh-bye, Win10.

  48. Also not forgetting about... by SurenEnfiajyan · · Score: 1

    clipboard.

  49. Anal probe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's now time to not only submit to the MS anal probe, but now you have to like it. How else will they be able to search your files for those they can use against you?

    Glad most of my firejails do not allow internet access and I don't mind the hassle of occasionally editing an iptables rule.

  50. predecessor at www.gce.name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The old VMS add-in "safety", available at http://www.gce.name, has a hierarchical storage system that includes this kind of space management. Normally it's designed to sense when more space is needed and run a cleaning process that moves or deletes unnecessary stuff, can respond by moving files over a network, compressing them, moving to offline storage if a jukebox is available, etc. When doing this it leaves tiny placeholders allowing automatic retrieval if files moved are opened again.
    This all works, has worked since the thing was published in the mid 1990s. The site has the documentation and complete source code.
    The problem with such systems is however that filesystems tend to accumulate placeholder files, and if someone designs any search programs that try to open everything on a machine, to index or security classify it for instance, the automated retrieval and re-shelving can get awfully slow. It is useful in some ways but won't turn a 5 l. sack into a 10 lb one. Compression, btw, tends to add less delay than remote retrieval. While things have changed since 1994, I think these observations won't be totally off.

  51. Encryption by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Either you have encrypted your data from day 0, or you shouldn't put 3rd party personnal data into a OneDrive / GoogleDrive / DropBox / etc. shared folder to begin with.
    Unless that service is rated for the kind of data you want to store on it (is OneDrive considered HIPAA compliant ?)

    ----

    To go back to the grandma example :
      - it could be plausible
      - typically, she could have some internet-wizard grand nephew who tells her about the "wonders of the cloud" (now with 150% more "always backed up!(tm)" fairy dust inside).
      - grandma can manage to remember the name "one drive"
      - grandma is definitely guaranteed to not understand the subtleties (such as, e.g., how to flag a critical file to always be kept locally, no matter the free space pressure)
      - so grandma puts some critical file into the by-default "wipeable cache" category.
      - automatic (unavoidable as usual) windows build upgrade starts.
      - after crashing a couple times (and leaving the PC filled with trash), upgrade decides it needs yet another 16 GB before proceeding further ( <- seen that, already)
      - upgrade automatically (well after a timeout that grandma doesn't pay attention to. Or that grandma absentmindedly clicks away, having been plavov-trained to do that) decide to free the 16 GB on its own.
      - the critical files got caught among these 16 GB that got freed (because grandma didn't knew she had to mark this file as "never remove from local cache")
      - now that it has the 16 GB freed, upgrade restarts.
      - this time upgrade miraculously runs successfully until the end, without crashing.
      - new version of Windows reboots
      - new version of Windows is (how surprising~~) broken. This time it's the network suddenly stopping to work
      - grandma cannot recover her critical files (she'd need the "internet wizard nephew" 's help, but can't remember the phonenumber, because the number was, well, you guessed it, among the auto-purged files).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Encryption by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      ...(is OneDrive considered HIPAA compliant ?)

      OneDrive for Business is. Of the cloud enterprises, Microsoft seems to be the one that will deal with HIPAA agreements the easiest.

  52. It's a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... That Steam is working on that Proton thing for Windows games on Linux. Really good thing if this is going to happen.

  53. The Cloud by AdamStarks · · Score: 1

    The trouble with the Cloud is that eventually you run out of other people's computers

  54. Files go to the untrustworthy companies cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great idea! Now they can spy on you, commit data theft as they were but even easier now!

  55. Grrrrrrreat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like I want something Auto Cleaning my downloads folder.
    Some of us actually want to keep downloaded installers and such.

  56. Logs by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

    Storage Sense will also be able to remove temporary or otherwise unneeded files such as system logs and image thumbnails.

    Awesome. There's nothing as useful as having system logs in the cloud when you're trying to troubleshoot connectivity issues.

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  57. A good way of solving Windows 10's space usage by NecroMancer · · Score: 1

    Just solve the WinSxS mess.

  58. On-premises or colocated? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Is this ownCloud instance on your premises, in a VPS at a datacenter, in a leased dedicated server at a datacenter, or in your own dedicated server that you colocate in a datacenter? If on your premises, then you may have to pay extra per month for a dedicated IP address that isn't behind carrier-grade network address translation (CGNAT), and it doesn't solve offsite backup. If in a datacenter, you still need to trust the datacenter operator and guard your infrastructure against getting snooped, hacked, etc.

    1. Re:On-premises or colocated? by orient · · Score: 1

      It depends on the use case. My personal ownCloud runs at home, on an OpenBSD machine behind another OpenBSD firewall, the static IP being replaced by dynamic DNS. The offsite backup is provided by Tarsnap.

      But, as you said, once you no longer control the physical access, you can't avoid having to trust somebody other than yourself.

      --
      Laudele lor desigur m-ar mahni peste masura.
    2. Re:On-premises or colocated? by tepples · · Score: 1

      the static IP being replaced by dynamic DNS

      Even dynamic DNS won't help when your ISP doesn't provide a globally routable IP address for your home at all. An ISP using CGNAT routes the outgoing connections of dozens of subscribers through the same global IP address and blocks incoming TCP connections. And Bert64 reports that some countries have so few IPv4 addresses that all home ISPs use CGNAT.

    3. Re: On-premises or colocated? by orient · · Score: 1

      You're right. If your iSP doesn't give you a routable iP address, you can get a cheap VPS, open an encrypted tunnel from your home server to the VPS and, with a bit of pf magic, forward all incoming traffic on the 443 port of the VPS through the tunnel. There you go, static internet iP address for your self+hosted ownCloud.

      --
      Laudele lor desigur m-ar mahni peste masura.
  59. Oh, you still had a terabyte left? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So sorry, we were positive your disk was full. Our bad!

  60. MS/NSA: "Network Storage Access" feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So not only does MS need to continuously track you and your actions, it also needs your files. That's transparency, at least.

  61. What's wrong with 'touch'ing files? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you gotta do is run a script to touch all the files once a day and then OneDrive will never delete the files locally.

  62. Fix their temp file problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is so much garbage in the Temp folder these days it's not funny, and it's getting worse all the time. Temporary files and folders from Office, Outlook, automatic Metro/Store apps, Nvidia, to name some of the primary offenders, all gets new copies stored daily and never deleted, running up file counts and wasting space. Because Microsoft does not know how to delete temporary files and folders that it creates itself. You'd think a modern OS would pay close attention to this issue but Microsoft does not! It's disgusting. And that's just the Temp folder, there's lots more useless garbage and redundant copies scattered around the hard drive in other BS folders by Windows.

    Going through and cleaning up after the fact, while overdue and necessary, is just treating the symptom not the problem.

  63. It is a cache, dummies by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    The idea behind OneDrive is to store your files on Microsoft servers, so that you can access them from anywhere you have access to Microsoft servers, with your account. Don't like it, you are free to use local storage, your own NAS, or another "cloud" provider.

    To avoid requiring permanent access to Microsoft servers, decrease latency, stay compatible with "offline" apps, etc... the files are copied to local storage. But from a purely user perspective it doesn't matter, you are working "in the cloud". The local files can come and go as the system see fit, it is just a cache. And that a cache is flushed sometimes is a good thing, you don't want all of your 1TB account to end up on your 500GB laptop for instance... Note that if you don't want the local cache to be flushed for some files (because you really need them offline), you just have to mark them so.

  64. Solution in search of a problem. by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Why do we need to store our data on someone else's computer (aka "the cloud")? Storage is dirt cheap. It's also yours.

  65. cloud vs hard-drives..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm no expert, but isn't 'cloud storage' just a bunch of hard-drives someplace else? - Okay so there's economies of scale and bunching everything up together to save unused space.... but if you've got unused space on your HDD.... your drive isn't full.