Slashdot Mirror


'Seven Dirty Words' Restriction Policy Lifted from .US Domain Name Registrations (circleid.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Neustar, the registry operator of the .US domain and NTIA have reversed course, allowing the inclusion of previously restricted "seven dirty words" from future .US domain name registrations. The decision came after EFF and the Cyberlaw Clinic at Harvard Law School intervened in the cancelation of a domain name containing a restricted word. The domain name -- fucknazis.us -- registered by Mr. Rubin was suspended by Neustar calling it a violation of an NTIA "seven dirty words" policy -- "a phrase with particular First Amendment significance," said EFF. Further reading: EFF: Yes, You Can Name A Website "Fucknazis.us".

87 comments

  1. So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which words?

    1. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One starts with an N. Ends in a R. You guess.

    2. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      November...

    3. Re:So by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      The words are: shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, and tits.

      This list is dated and US-centric.

      "Piss" is no longer considered impolite. Even my mom says "The cat pissed on the carpet."

      Australians use "cunt" as a casual gender neutral pronoun.

      In Britain, tits are birds, what an American would call a chickadee.

    4. Re:So by Scarletdown · · Score: 2

      And tits doesn't even belong on the list. In fact, it sounds like a snack. :)

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    5. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is it nagger? Naggers really annoy me.

      (Pst, to the sensitive, that was a South Park reference.)

    6. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tots, meet Tits. Tits, Tots!

    7. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tater tits!

    8. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Remember kids, you can prick your finger, just don't finger your prick!"

    9. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are George Carlin's Seven Dirty Words. What we want to know is Neustar's Seven Dirty Words. Maybe they are the same, but Neustar was not mentioned in your link.

    10. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard worse words from my wife... usually towards me.

    11. Re:So by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I enjoy that each of the seven words have their own wikipedia page. Like, I needed a wiki page for cocksucker. Also the image associated with it is hilarious.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    12. Re:So by ExaltedCyclop · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from freshman students to professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything, and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea. However, citation of Wikipedia in research papers may be considered unacceptable, because Wikipedia is not a reliable source. "Bould, Dylan M., et al., References that anyone can edit: review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature, 2014, British Medical Journal, 6 March 2014, 348 DOI, online from BMJ" "New Age judge blasts Apple | The Register" "Avoid Wikipedia, warns Wikipedia chief | The Register" Most colleges and universities (Especially in some high schools and private schools) have a policy that prohibits students from using Wikipedia as their source for doing research papers, essays, or anything equivalent. This is because Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any moment. Although when an error is recognized, it is usually fixed. However, because Wikipedia cannot monitor thousands of edits made everyday, some of those edits could contain vandalism or could be simply wrong and left unnoticed for days, weeks, months, or even years. https://www.theguardian.com/ed... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    13. Re: So by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Now I'm craving pizza tits.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    14. Re:So by jimbobxxx · · Score: 1

      In Britain, tits are birds

      Hence:

      Tits like coconuts.

      Blackbirds like bread crumbs on the lawn

    15. Re:So by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      The .US domain was being policed by by Neustar (a US based company) and NTIA (a US government agency). The guy who registered the domain is in the US. The EFF is based in the US. The Cyberlaw Clinic is in the US. The 7 dirty words list was based on a US court case.

      Yes, the list is outdated. The wikipedia article I linked has details about and reference links to the 2010 US court case that ruled the list unconstitutional.

      That said, the entire story is US-centric, so why would you think the way language is used in other countries would have any bearing?

    16. Re:So by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      It all stems from the FCC "decency" policy that roots in the 1950s

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    17. Re:So by OutOnARock · · Score: 1

      ....I know.....they are.....

    18. Re:So by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Carlin's 7 dirty words were from a court case that actually banned those 7 words. That case is referenced in the article as the source of the list they were banning, so it's the same list.

    19. Re:So by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      The words are: shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, and tits.

      This list is dated and US-centric.

      Why would you include "fuck" twice? It seems like "motherfucker" would be blocked based on just "fuck".

    20. Re: So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Napster?

    21. Re:So by mjwx · · Score: 1

      The words are: shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, and tits.

      This list is dated and US-centric.

      "Piss" is no longer considered impolite. Even my mom says "The cat pissed on the carpet."

      Australians use "cunt" as a casual gender neutral pronoun.

      In Australia you're not really mates (friends) with someone until you can call them "cunt" as a normal greeting.

      In Britain, tits are birds, what an American would call a chickadee.

      In the UK Tits are birds and birds are women. English is strange. Chickadee sounds like a brand of chicken nuggets. Tit is also a minor curse for someone who's a bit of an idiot or unlikable Swearing and cursing in En_UK is a very complex topic.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  2. According to the link by reiterate · · Score: 1

    They're accepting ethereum donations

    1. Re: According to the link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can't wait to see the hot nazi action! It is a porn site, right?

    2. Re: According to the link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking whitehouse.gov

    3. Re: According to the link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's a shame that liberals aren't more open about their desire to have sexual congress with National Socialists. Come out of the closet already!

    4. Re: According to the link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking whitehouse.gov

      I recall whitehouse.com being a porn site 20 yrs ago but it looks like it's changed hands since.

    5. Re: According to the link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully those new hands are big enough.

    6. Re: According to the link by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      That's some weird great-grandmother fetish! (not judging...)

      Any nazi alive today is in their 90s.

    7. Re: According to the link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you are so smart.

    8. Re: According to the link by Xenx · · Score: 1

      No no, it's a site for people that are overly critical about the way people are having sex.

  3. For those unfamiliar... by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 5, Funny

    or who have never seen the George Carlin routine:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
    1. Re:For those unfamiliar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Memories.. I had that album on vinyl years ago.

  4. As I say on all these stories ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As I say on all these stories ... all words are just arbitrary strings of characters that convey meaning.

    And one of the meanings that offensive words carry is that of offense. The people using them are trying to give offense. These are units of communication, and that's literally what you are communicating with them.

    The childish thing is not to recognize that, but to pretend that you don't recognize it.

    1. Re:As I say on all these stories ... by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Belgium!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:As I say on all these stories ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so i registered fuckpythonandtheirgaymasterslavepcidiocyR.us.

    3. Re:As I say on all these stories ... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Reported. :D

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    4. Re: As I say on all these stories ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      R.us looks like a Russian site to the uninformed. Try a lil harder, like my dick.

      Fuckpythonandtheirpcbullsh.it looks better

    5. Re:As I say on all these stories ... by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

      Semprini?

      OUT!

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    6. Re: As I say on all these stories ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whats R.us got to do with fuckpythonandtheirgaymasterslavepcidiocyR.us? did you imagine a dot somewhere the OP correctly omitted? READ AGAIN prease. oh, and lick me where i shit.

    7. Re:As I say on all these stories ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The childish thing is not to recognize that, but to pretend that you don't recognize it.

      I do not understand. Are you saying that the people arguing against the ban are pretending the offense does not exist?

      If so, then we should ban your speech as well as it conveyed offense to me.

      If instead your point was "so they are offensive, so what? Suck it up buttercup", then I agree.

    8. Re:As I say on all these stories ... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Well, belgium... Got hit with a reference I don't get finally. :)

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    9. Re:As I say on all these stories ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can testify that the people of EA were offended by that word. Chairs were thrown and office supplies misused.

    10. Re:As I say on all these stories ... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Hey, Hey, HEY!! This isn't a Serious Screenplay, you stupid turlingdrome!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    11. Re:As I say on all these stories ... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That makes language very boring, and isn't true anyway.

      The word shit refers to something most people want nothing to do with, a substance they find disgusting. That's what gives it its power to shock; confronting the listener with that image.

      If you really do consider all words to be merely there to convey meaning then language gets very dull. That's one of the worst things about advertising - it devalues and neuters words.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:As I say on all these stories ... by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      The people using them are trying to give offense.

      Bullshit.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    13. Re:As I say on all these stories ... by rpresser · · Score: 1

      The word shit refers to something most people want nothing to do with, a substance they find disgusting.

      And yet nearly everyone literally contains up to a few pounds of it inside themselves, at almost all times. (Unless they're preparing for a colonoscopy.)

    14. Re:As I say on all these stories ... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Why is a word that is used when hitting a finger with a hammer considered offensive?

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    15. Re:As I say on all these stories ... by porlryan · · Score: 1

      There are no offensive words, only offensive intent. If I said "You are a disgrace to humanity" you would rightly be offended, despite me not using any "offensive" words. If I said "You're fucking awesome!" You wouldn't be offended, unless you happen to have an irrational fear of "offensive" words.

    16. Re:As I say on all these stories ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sick f*ck.
      This is a christian website! Children browse here!
      How could you be so vile?!

  5. fucknazis.us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reads like a porn site.

    1. Re:fucknazis.us by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      or an shirty flash game

    2. Re:fucknazis.us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was imaging a dating service.

    3. Re:fucknazis.us by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Your mission: Use this swastika to pleasure these four blonde ladies at the same time!

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    4. Re:fucknazis.us by Thud457 · · Score: 2

      DO NOT gis "swasticock".

      Or do. Who am I to tell people what to do with their lives.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  6. Fucksocialists.us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will still be banned however... as will the N word and Alexjones.us

  7. What I can't figure out is... by Nutria · · Score: 1

    why people want to have sex with Nazis.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:What I can't figure out is... by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      its a real gas

  8. Banned by hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trust me. There are a number of so-called progressives on here that talk a good game but really voted for Trump.

  9. What's the Carlin bit where... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...he muses about how guys decide they are homo? I cannot find it. One of the lines goes like "are they walking down the street one day and they just stop and turn and say 'you know Ralph, I'd really like a dick up my ass right now!"

    What is that bit?

  10. Shh.. don't tell python snowflakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In before master.us and slave.us are taken BAHAHA.

  11. Thank goodness by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wouldn't want to hinder someone taking a brave stand against Nazis, some 73 years too late ...

  12. Only because they are now irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those little irrelevant cunts at .us are now obsolete lol.. Now that all the new TLD's are out, .us registrar will quickly be losing lots of money and hopefully go out of business.

    This new 'policy' is nothing more than a desperate money grab. Glad I've never reg'd a .us . Those holier than thou twats seem to like playing morality god.

    1. Re:Only because they are now irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because Americans are happy to get fucked up the ass by their political taskmasters. One fucking retarded loser after another.

  13. Fuckedcompany.com by mea2214 · · Score: 1

    I remember that site around the turn of this century. How did they get around this ban?

    1. Re:Fuckedcompany.com by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      I remember that site around the turn of this century. How did they get around this ban?

      Apparently it was the .us registrar who had the prohibition. Not .com

    2. Re:Fuckedcompany.com by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      I remember that site around the turn of this century. How did they get around this ban?

      BRB, going to register comcastfucked.us and thefccfucked.us real quick.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  14. Fun! by Doc+Right · · Score: 0

    Oh the fun one can have using other verbs and a .US tld though... slap.us!

  15. The childish thing is grow people being "offended" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is not a school for pubescent teenagers, nor a playschool for toddlers, nor a stereotypical chest-thumping mediterranean Mafia boys setting.
    How is it, that people openly say, they are "offended", and we even take them seriously?

    When somebody states something bad about you, it is either wrong, or it is right.

    If it is right, you have to live with it. Nobody's perfect. You can do something wrong, even have something wrong with you, but still not be wrong. If somebody says I'm fat, which, for European standards, I am, that's both true, and not a good thing. But why would I think that makes me a bad person? Yeah, I'm addicted. I might even be a junkie. I still haven't processed some major shit from my life. But I'm on it, fighting every day. I'm not bad because some fuckers did something to me, now am I? (Disclaimer: When I say major, I don't mean "somebody was mean to me"-level, like you probably assume. I mean "brainwashing Saw rape dungeon and war horrors"-level.)

    And if it is wrong, I also have two choices: I can confidently treat it like the nonsense that it is, and e.g. ridicule the moron or point out how pathetic he is, if that is even necessary. Or I can react by getting all defensive, arguing to refute his arguments, and thereby award them weight in the first place, making everyone else around us think "Hmm, looks like he thinks these criticisms are so valid, that he needs to defend against them. Either they are true, or he is one insecure fuck of a loser.". And as soon as I break out the "offensive" card, they will definitely think the latter.

    In any case though, words themselves cannot be "offensive". It requires it to be meant in a bad way too!
    And there lies the problem: When people are such insecure losers, that they actively LOOK for anything that they can "interpret" as having meant badly. It's the foundation of all of political correctness and SJW bullying. ... They need it to be meant in a bad way, because that is the prejudice they have towards the world. And it conveniently gives them the upper hand, and allows them to bully other people, without being seen as the bully. Something that people who believe they are "born losers" of course eat up like flies eat shit.

    That is what we need to cure: The general epidemic of insecure "house of cards" personalities.
    And you wouldn't believe if I told you, how many cultural things solely exist because of that.

  16. Sam Cuntman still cant get email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What freedumbs!

  17. Poor pudding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How ever will you survive your tortured existence with everyone conspiring against you? Better to just kill yourself right now before they murder-suicide you like Vince Foster! You know too much man!!

    1. Re:Poor pudding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, people defending censorship in their favor sure get nasty when people point out factual info.

  18. Tits.com by Zorro · · Score: 1

    DAMN already gone!

  19. Taboo words just changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they will let you register fagg ot, n1 gger, h0 mo, dirtyarab, fuckqu3ers or anything like that.

    I highly doubt it. So "fucknazis" is now OK, but "fuckqu3ers" probably is not. What's the difference? This all just reflects the prejudices of the people running the registrar, not some increase in freedom.

    I say either be polite towards everyone, or let everyone register whatever they want. This arbitrary picking and choosing is just hypocrisy.

    Note I was intially rejected by Slashdot and had to modify my "taboo words".

  20. Proud to have a .com with two of the seven by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Years ago and with less scrutiny in the process, I registered a .com domain with two of the seven plus one that would be offensive to a fair number of religious people. Now I am a little too old to use it as an email address, but it is still fun to have.

  21. I don't see the problem by SpaceCracker · · Score: 1

    Two dirty words ('fuck', and 'nazis') are 2 negatives that make a positive. Seems legit to me.

    --
    sigo ergo sum
    1. Re:I don't see the problem by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      but are you one of those people that gets triggered by porn stars wearing nazi uniforms?

    2. Re:I don't see the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nazisfuck.us would be more pertinent to the current state of affairs

  22. 7 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real question is this: can Scunthorpe handle the resulting tourism boom?

  23. Poor punkin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found the triggered socialist!

  24. Suggestion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trumpfucked.us

  25. Double standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you register fuckjews.us though?

  26. no by MJhasHIV · · Score: 0

    yes. you can name a website fucknazis.yes ;[

    1. Re:no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you can name them like fuckdems.us or commiesfucked.us

    2. Re:no by Megane · · Score: 1

      If you have more imagination, you would register "fucked.us" and sell sub-domains.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }