Slashdot Mirror


To Fight Climate Change, California Says 'We're Launching Our Own Damn Satellite' (latimes.com)

An anonymous reader quotes the Los Angeles Times: Jerry Brown closed his climate summit in San Francisco on Friday with a dramatic announcement: California will launch its own satellite into orbit to track and monitor the formation of pollutants that cause climate change. "With science still under attack and the climate threat growing, we're launching our own damn satellite," Brown said in prepared remarks. "This groundbreaking initiative will help governments, businesses and landowners pinpoint -- and stop -- destructive emissions with unprecedented precision, on a scale that's never been done before...."

The state will develop the satellite with the San Francisco-based Earth-imaging firm Planet Labs, a company founded by former NASA scientists in 2010. The state may ultimately launch multiple satellites into space, according to the governor's office.... Robbie Schingler, co-founder of Planet Labs, said the project will inform "how advanced satellite technology can enhance our ability to measure, monitor, and ultimately, mitigate the impacts of climate change..." Brown's announcement came in quickly delivered remarks at the close of the three-day gathering and received a standing ovation from many in the audience.

Governors from 17 states (and from both political parties) also pledged to spend $1.4 billion to lower auto emissions, using money from Volkwagen's legal settlement over falsifying clean-air performance data. New York City also announced that its pension fund would invest $4 billion in companies offering climate change solution over the next three years.

And 26 states, cities and businesses said they'd procure non-polluting vehicle fleets by 2030, while ChargePoint and EV Box pledged to build 3.5 million new charging stations around the world.

11 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Finally, but they need multiple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    CA will tax consumed goods/.services based on which nation/state

    That is probably unconstitutional.

  2. There goes the pension fund. by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1, Informative

    New York City also announced that its pension fund would invest $4 billion in companies offering climate change solution over the next three years.

    What could possibly go wrong?

    1. Re: There goes the pension fund. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      On average, they didn't happen with the same frequency and severity.

  3. Oooh shiny object! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative

    Gotta do something to distract from the $100 billion 100 MPH train from Bakersfield to Modesto!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  4. Jerry Brown, paragon of climate virtue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Jerry Brown, paragon of climate virtue... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, we DID have a great place until the previous President yanked funding. Thankfully that's being addressed right now.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:Jerry Brown, paragon of climate virtue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ACTUALLY, that was CONGRESS, not OBAMA, sorry you Republican Trumptards don't know or understand the difference between those things. Oh yeah, and you haven't done shit meanwhile. Why? Too busy golfing, or treason?

      https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/politics-and-government/nevada/chairman-promises-house-vote-on-yucca-mountain-funding/

  5. Re:Good Job by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fuel consumption on a Falcon 9 (surely their launch vehicle of choice) is equivalent to ~70 typical diesel cars (8l/100km) driving a typical 20k km/year for 1 year.

    E.g., not a tiny amount of emissions, but not some vast amount either.

    --
    They carry weapons and they know if you've been bad or good. Not everybody's good, but everyone tries.
  6. Re: Finally, but they need multiple by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative

    That is already the case. More federal money flows to Red states, while Blue states are constantly milked by the GOP.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  7. Re: Finally, but they need multiple by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a better IDEA. How about the feds pay each state what is collected in their state? CA would LOVE it. In fact, all of the blue/purple states would love it. We are the ones supporting the feds while the red states suck on the tits and waste money such as the SLS/Orion crap, the M1A2 which is in dire need of major upgrade, or decent fighters that are not produce in texas with such piss-poor quality and outrageous prices. What L-Mart charges America and our allies for the F-35 is nothing less than treason. The list goes on and on.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  8. Re: Finally, but they need multiple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    That statistic is of course deliberately deceptive. When you include personal and corporate income exemptions, the numbers flip. If you remove military salaries, it flips. Clearly, California running off military installations is a red state welfare.