Slashdot Mirror


To Fight Climate Change, California Says 'We're Launching Our Own Damn Satellite' (latimes.com)

An anonymous reader quotes the Los Angeles Times: Jerry Brown closed his climate summit in San Francisco on Friday with a dramatic announcement: California will launch its own satellite into orbit to track and monitor the formation of pollutants that cause climate change. "With science still under attack and the climate threat growing, we're launching our own damn satellite," Brown said in prepared remarks. "This groundbreaking initiative will help governments, businesses and landowners pinpoint -- and stop -- destructive emissions with unprecedented precision, on a scale that's never been done before...."

The state will develop the satellite with the San Francisco-based Earth-imaging firm Planet Labs, a company founded by former NASA scientists in 2010. The state may ultimately launch multiple satellites into space, according to the governor's office.... Robbie Schingler, co-founder of Planet Labs, said the project will inform "how advanced satellite technology can enhance our ability to measure, monitor, and ultimately, mitigate the impacts of climate change..." Brown's announcement came in quickly delivered remarks at the close of the three-day gathering and received a standing ovation from many in the audience.

Governors from 17 states (and from both political parties) also pledged to spend $1.4 billion to lower auto emissions, using money from Volkwagen's legal settlement over falsifying clean-air performance data. New York City also announced that its pension fund would invest $4 billion in companies offering climate change solution over the next three years.

And 26 states, cities and businesses said they'd procure non-polluting vehicle fleets by 2030, while ChargePoint and EV Box pledged to build 3.5 million new charging stations around the world.

4 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. Sure they will by argStyopa · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...because that's a prudent use of the taxpayer's money: "Virtue signaling".

    Oh yeah, and there's this: https://californiapolicycenter...

    --
    -Styopa
  2. Re:Finally, but they need multiple by careysub · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ah the Cole and Ohanian paper again, but with an extra heaping of customized unhinged exaggeration ("and that's likely an under estimate as it comes from UCLA"). Since the legislation was signed in June 1933, three months after FDR entered office (March 4 in those days), and the Great Depression did in fact end no later than June 1940 when the US per capita GDP had recovered to its pre-depression level (the NBER, who is the semi-official self-designated shot-caller for recessions places it much earlier, but there are good reasons to disregard their definition). I guess since the paper is from UCLA economists he believes FDR actually signed the legislation before he took office perhaps.

    As Ohanian himself sighed 12 years after the paper was published:

    “People on the right would say, ‘Hey, look — these guys from UCLA — which is not perceived as some traditionally conservative place — said Roosevelt was to blame for the Depression continuing,’” Ohanian said. “Then people on the left would say, ‘Oh, these guys are conservative, paid mouthpieces for the Koch Foundation,’ which, of course, we were not. But neither side really understands what we did. “

    Now this complaint by Ohanian admittedly does nothing to clarify the matter of "what he did" and no explanation at all is found in the entire press release I linked to. You might however want to read this discussion of Ohanian and Cole's claims.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  3. Re:Finally, but they need multiple by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It has NOTHING to do with location other than the CO2 that emits from there.

    This is a direct violation of the WTO membership treaty signed by the US. Tariffs can't discriminate on "process and production methods".

    Nations do it ALL THE TIME.

    California is not a nation.

  4. Re: Finally, but they need multiple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    This. California can go ahead and leave the nation as far as most of us are concerned.

    They like to talk about science denial there, and yet they suppress and attack science that says that men and women aren't exactly identical, that IQ (general intelligence) is important in determining success in life and that it differs among populations in ways that cannot be explained except by genetics, and of course well documented studies proving that diversity has at best a neutral impact on organizational performance (that it is not, in fact, a strength). Those don't fit the narrative and yet they're all pretty established and repeatable science.