Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Windows U-turn Removes Warning About Installing Chrome, Firefox (cnet.com)

Earlier last week, several users with a new Windows 10 build reported that they were seeing a warning when they attempted to install Chrome or Firefox browser. It turns out, Microsoft has listened to the complaints and is reversing course. CNET reports: A new "fast-ring" test version of Windows, Insider Preview Build 17760, no longer interrupts the installation of rival browsers, a CNET test shows. Earlier this week, an earlier test version of Windows would warn people who tried to install the Chrome, Firefox, Opera or Vivaldi web browsers, "You already have Microsoft Edge -- the safer, faster browser for Windows 10." The dialog box presented two options: "Open Microsoft Edge" -- the default -- and "Install anyway." The feature raised some hackles and brought back memories of Microsoft's strong-arm tactics promoting its old Internet Explorer browser in the first browser wars two decades ago. But Microsoft isn't alone in such tactics: Google promotes its Chrome browser as faster and safer to people who visit its own websites with other browsers.

17 of 100 comments (clear)

  1. Warning! by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

    Installing those browsers could endanger the feelings of Edge. Why doesn't anyone love our little Edge? You Racists!

    That should at least get the left back into the boat.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. I wish ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... Microsoft had warned me before installing Windows 10. :-)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  3. Ads are too far too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unlike Google I actually pay to use Windows on my systems. It needs to be an operating system, not a fucking ad machine, which is what it is becoming.

  4. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    You shouldn't have to. But if something bothered me that much, I'd start getting active instead of hoping that someone might one day do it for me.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. I still use Internet Explorer by jfdavis668 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The best browser to use to download a better browser.

  6. they are not 'listening to users'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    don't kid yourself.. they don't give a shit about you.

    they're listening to their lawyers.

  7. Still has a prompt when changing default browser by xack · · Score: 4, Informative

    Microsoft still bugs you about Edge when changing default browser making you “switch anyway”. Plus like I said in a previous post Microsoft Edge is evil.

  8. Re:That was expected after the bad press by omnichad · · Score: 5, Funny

    They tried putting it on Bing, but nobody visits that site.

  9. Re:That leaves just Google scaring users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every time I visit the Google homepage with something other than Chrome I get a big prompt with a button to go and install a "more secure browser". Can we get Google to take this down next or does only Microsoft live by this standard?

    That is a serious false-equivalence. If we're holding them to the same standard then Microsoft is free to promote Edge on a website that it owns. (assuming that you're even telling the truth about the Google homepage - I can't reproduce what you're reporting so I'll just have to take your word for it)

    Now, if having Chrome installed on your computer also added a routine to monitor for and interrupt attempts to install any competing browser then you might have a point about Google, but it still wouldn't excuse Microsoft.

  10. Nice false equivilance by Uberbah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The feature raised some hackles and brought back memories of Microsoft's strong-arm tactics promoting its old Internet Explorer browser in the first browser wars two decades ago. But Microsoft isn't alone in such tactics: Google promotes its Chrome browser as faster and safer to people who visit its own websites with other browsers.

    Yeah, Microsoft is alone in these tactics as Google isn't interrupting other installations. If Microsoft put up an ad on Bing.com calling Edge the fastest secure browser, then you'd have a comparison.

  11. Re:Obvious dumb idea by StormReaver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They should've known they'd catch hell for this so why do it only to have to walk it back?

    They knew they would catch hell for it, but they also knew there would be no real consequences. In the meantime, maybe they could get more suckers to try Edge before Microsoft had to stop its attempt to leverage its desktop monopoly to get back into browsers.

  12. Re:Obvious dumb idea by Junta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm going to guess trying to *intentionally* invoke Streisand effect.

    They *know* that pulling these shenanigans in a beta build won't have *substantial* negative impacts. No legal troubles (it was just a preview) and people moving to a different desktop OS? Maybe if MS wasn't pretty much a monopoly and there were viable choices, but they know their users aren't going anywhere.

    What they *did* get was every tech media outlet mentioning that MS considers edge good enough to tell people not to bother with chrome/firefox.

    So people mock Edge some more, but edge *always* gets mocked. I wouldn't be surprised if some casual users latched on to the 'hmm... maybe Microsoft has something if they are willing to try to take things that far, maybe I'll give it a try now.

    Basically, MS has nothing to lose, but the publicity might move the needle a little. I guarantee that edge nor Windows *loses* any share over this.

    One could argue this undoes their efforts to earn goodwill by appearing to be industry friendly, but realistically speaking people don't trust them anyway.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  13. Re:Welp by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are we replying to questions with other questions? It looks like it.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  14. Re:Will Firefox show up in the store? by zekica · · Score: 2

    Take a look at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-... section 10.2.1

  15. Re:That was expected after the bad press by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 2

    "MS is not allowed to limit windows software to their own products only."

    And by virtue of the install anyway button, they are not.
    Horrible practice, but ultimately rather meaningless as they don't prevent installation.
    Other than the blatant pop-up, I don't see this as differing much from the difficulty of installing third party non-Apple approved apps on an iDevice...

    --
    Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
  16. Google Chrome hypocrisy by sremick · · Score: 2

    Now can the tech world stop being hypocrites and come down on Google next for the shit they're pulling with Chrome?

    Drive-by trojan installs inside of unrelated software. Endless nagging to change the default browser, leveraging their market share of online services (search, email, etc) to do so. Proprietary web markup resulting in "This page requires Google Chrome" crap that Microsoft got their ass reamed out about during the original browser wars.

    https://www.theverge.com/2018/...

    People have short attention spans. Google is pulling all the same shit Microsoft got held to the fire over but for some reason everyone is willing to give Google a free pass. What the fuck? Browser monoculture is NOT ok... all the same reasons apply even when it's Chrome and not IE.

    Chrome is a fucking arrogant RAM and resource hog and you're better off using Firefox anyway. Is Firefox perfect? Of course not, they have lots of room for improvement. But compared to the clusterfuck that Chrome has become, it's the lesser of 3 evils by a mile.

    1. Re:Google Chrome hypocrisy by DRJlaw · · Score: 2

      All relevant parts of Chrome, JavaScript and HTML engines, plugin architecture, etc are open source. Additionally Chrome has far fewer proprietary extensions then IE ever had. It's just that Edge still does not support basic stuff like Formdata.

      Chrome is not open source, Chromium is. And even then:

      "Drive-by trojan installs [of Chromium] inside of unrelated software. Endless nagging to change [to] the [Chromiom] browser, leveraging their market share of online services (search, email, etc) to do so. Proprietary web markup resulting in "This page requires Google [Chromium]" crap that Microsoft got their ass reamed out about during the original browser wars."

      How would open-sourceness negate the abuse-of-market practices that surround each mention of an (allegedly) open source browser? The fact that others could pump oil from the ground was not sufficient to save Standard Oil, because what is prohibited is the behavior by those having market power, not having a unique product.

      And again, Chrome is not open source, Chromium is.