Slashdot Mirror


EU To Stop Changing the Clocks in October 2019 (dw.com)

European Commissioner for Transport Violeta Bulc last week announced that the EU will stop the twice-yearly changing of clocks across the continent in October 2019. From a report: The practice, which was used as a means to conserve energy during the World Wars as well as the oil crises of the 1970s, became law across the bloc in 1996. All EU countries are required to move forward by an hour on the last Sunday of March and back by an hour on the final Sunday in October. Bulc said EU member states would have until April 2019 to decide whether they would permanently remain on summer or winter time. [...] "In order to maintain a harmonised approach we are encouraging consultations at national levels to ensure a coordinated approach of all member states," Bulc said. The decision to tackle the issue was prompted after the Commission launched an online survey. Some 4.6 million Europeans answered the survey -- three million of those respondents were from Germany -- with 80 percent of them voting to scrap the practice .

211 comments

  1. Per the Car Talk guys by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    Let's go for Double-Dutch Daylight Savings - permanently!!

    (RIP Tommy)

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Per the Car Talk guys by rojash · · Score: 0

      Best comment in years !!! US does need their heads checked !!

    2. Re:Per the Car Talk guys by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      I miss listening to Click and Clack.

  2. About time! (heh) by divide+overflow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    DST is a waste of time. Now it is time for the U.S. to do the same.

    1. Re:About time! (heh) by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 5, Funny

      DST is a waste of time. Now it is time for the U.S. to do the same.

      Now that the EU has got rid of it, the US will start changing the clocks four time times a year just to be contrary.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US doesn't care what the EU does. Besides, quite a few states in the US dropped DST quite a while ago.

    3. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, picked up DST.
      All the non DST counties were forced to use DST.
      Only AZ, and HI don't have DST.

    4. Re:About time! (heh) by s4080326 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      DST is a poor substitute for deregulation of work hours. I live in a location without daylight savings, but I'm fortunate enough that in summer I can start work early ( I wake with the sun) do my hours and finish early.

    5. Re:About time! (heh) by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Stay on standard time. I hate waiting an extra hour for darkness to fall in the Summer. The days are long enough.

    6. Re:About time! (heh) by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      That would require them to admit they were wrong about something, and that'll never happen.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    7. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that the EU has got rid of it, the US will start changing the clocks four time times a year just to be contrary.

      Florida voted to do just that: the Sunshine Protection Act, enacted this year. All we need is the approval of Congress.

    8. Re: About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the EU is NOT getting rid of DST, they're doubling down and going to DST all year long.
      Just change your timezone, idiots. Quit fucking with the clocks.

    9. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does Alaska use DST?

    10. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Florida voted for all year daylight saving time which is why they need the approval of Congress. Any state may stay on standard time all year without approval.

    11. Re:About time! (heh) by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd be cool with just splitting the difference, and making "Eastern" time UTC-4.5 year-round (and presumably, making "Central" time UTC-5.5, "Mountain" time UTC-6.5, and "Pacific" time UTC-7.5). There's no international law that says timezones HAVE to be limited to whole-hour offsets from UTC.

      But yeah, where all the "abolish clock-changing" proposals (besides Florida's) have historically dropped the ball was in their attempt to drop "summer" time, rather than stay on it all year. People hate changing the clock, but they hate driving home from work in the dark(*) even more.

      (*) Other parts of the US might be different, but in Miami, evening gridlock gets PROFOUNDLY worse the day after DST ends. Why? Morning traffic is naturally spread out over the span of a few hours. During the summer, so is peak evening traffic... some people leave at 5,a few people with kids might leave earlier, but lots of people don't bother heading home and hitting the road until 6 or 6:30 (figuring traffic will start to let up & they'll get home around the same time anyway). The moment DST ends, though, literally EVERYONE in the office goes running for the door at 5pm & hits the road at once, causing instant gridlock that persists beyond 7pm. A drive that might have taken 45-60 minutes during the summer INSTANTLY turns into a daily 60-100 minute marathon.

    12. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your kids will love coming home from school in the dark. Better get them all reflective clothing.

    13. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of all the now unemployed clock changers you insensitive bastard!

    14. Re: About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Individual countries can decide for themselves what time they will settle on. This just removes the requirement to change it twice a year.

    15. Re:About time! (heh) by mad7777 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sure they will.... riiiiiiiiight after they adopt the metric system.

      --
      Might makes right irrelevant.
    16. Re:About time! (heh) by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      Don't have any kids young enough to be coming home from school, but if I did where I live it would have to get dark at 14:00 for them to be coming home in the dark.

      Now at the present time with DST and EST they end up standing in the dark in the morning waiting fro the bus, typically at 0600.

    17. Re:About time! (heh) by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

      DST is a waste of time. Now it is time for the U.S. to do the same.

      Damnit. I have modpoints now, and you're already at Score:5. I'd like to make that 6... but Slashdot cannot deal with Score values in excess of 5. :-/ Suffice it to say I WHOLEHEARTEDLY agree. Abolish that pointless shit.

      --
      Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    18. Re:About time! (heh) by sysstemlord · · Score: 2

      I will never understand what kind of logic makes a person decide to change the clock, in order to come home early, if you want to come home early then you change the work schedule to 7-4 instead of 8-5, for me this is the sane approach!

    19. Re:About time! (heh) by divide+overflow · · Score: 1

      And I too have midpoints now but cannot moderate a thread that I've commented in and mark your post "Insightful"...

    20. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would guess it is to keep the time difference consistent with some other state.

      It simplifies business calls.

    21. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already get home from school in the dark. When the sun sets in mid December and rises in mid January you don't really have much of a choice in the matter.
      Luckily I live in a socialist country where they don't have to walk on the same road the cars are driving on, or they can just take the bus.

    22. Re:About time! (heh) by divide+overflow · · Score: 1

      Modpoints, not midpoints. Damn spell correction gone rogue....

    23. Re:About time! (heh) by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      If you want to come home early, find a job that lets you telecommute.

    24. Re: About time! (heh) by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Could this be the beginning of governments all over the world getting thier nose out of places it doesn't belong? Turn into Twitter to find out.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    25. Re: About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Florida should vote for better public transportation.

    26. Re: About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not such a big impact. They were already unemployed 263 days out of the year.

    27. Re: About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, u sound like a dumb fag

    28. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in the USA and the Sun doesn't rise until 8a in the Winter and school starts at 7:30a. I had a 20min walk to school in the 90s.

    29. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UK will declare British Summer Time to be mandatory in winter.

    30. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two is quite a few? That's only 4%. If you lump in territories you are up to 9, but still...

      I agree with dropping it worldwide, though.

    31. Re: About time! (heh) by Lije+Baley · · Score: 2

      We should change to a single time zone for the entire contiguous U.S. and call it "freedom time"

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    32. Re:About time! (heh) by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      DST is a poor substitute for deregulation of work hours.

      No it's not, it's a work around to a problem that can't be solved without creating some other major problems. You want to deregulate work hours, sounds good individually. The econonmy is not you, individually going home. The economy is an interconnected mass that relies heavily on localised coordination in order to minimise waste.

    33. Re: About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Alaska for s couple years, you soon stop caring when its light or dark.

    34. Re: About time! (heh) by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      The practical logic that recognizes that ~94% of people have close to zero autonomy over their working hours, but employers blindly follow the clock. It's politically easier to change the clock than it is to convince individual HR departments to deviate from their blindly-followed norms.

    35. Re:About time! (heh) by dkman · · Score: 1

      I can't trust the government to get off their ass and do it, but I would love to see it on ballots so the people can tell the government that we want this to happen.

      Personally I'd like to see us finally move to metric, but I think I'll die before I see that happen.

      --
      I refuse to sign
    36. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Localized coordination? Maybe for the businesses, but not the individual. Having all hours occupied by businesses, and one hour (lunch hour) allocated towards my needs is quite inconvenient. Sure, retail outlets, food service, and entertainment venues are open outside of business hours, but what about routine maintenance? Yard repair, vets, roofers, plumbers, bank tellers? If it takes less than an hour, we're good. If it takes more than an hour then I have to wait a year for vacation time.

    37. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nixon tried to stay on Daylight Saving Time all year but ran into a major problem,
      The morning time when kids were picked up by the bus was pitch dark, causing injuries by being hit by cars etc.

      Just go back to Standard Time and live with it.

    38. Re:About time! (heh) by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Now that the EU has got rid of it, the US will start changing the clocks four time times a year just to be contrary.

      Don't be so silly. We have computers now and the wave of the future is computer type watches like Android had first, then Apple.
      We're going to the phased approach. So during the year they'll just update the information such that it'll slowly change every day. So from day to day you won't even notice. No more bitching about this!

      CP Time (Colored People time) will remain on time (about 5 minutes late).
      AT (Asshole time) will also somehow remain on time (About 2-3 hours late). Late enough to arrive just as the people were married and driving away to the reception.

    39. Re:About time! (heh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >_ The economy is an interconnected mass that relies heavily on localised coordination in order to minimise waste.

      The economy is an interconnected mass that relies heavily on localised coordination in order to maximise waste. There, FTFY.

      I live in a big city. Millions of people. "Coordinated."

      Trips which could be made in about 20 minutes take over an hour. You plan to leave home and drive for one hour to cover 10 miles (18 km) just to learn you're going to be late, because coordination cannot avoid a very high standard deviation in trip time.

      The economy will either switch to asynchronous or society will have to downscale. Except it doesn't. People don't leave the megalopolis -- even as water starts to be scarce.

      OTOH, OP says: "but I'm fortunate enough that in summer I can start work early ( I wake with the sun) do my hours and finish early."

      Well, I'm fortunate enough that I wake up late and thus can work until late hours, too. Thus I finish work earlier the day before -- before he who must start at the early hours of the next day.

      People who like DST want just a excuse to leave work while the Sun is still shining. Not a bad idea, it makes possible a lot of open activity -- just let us state clearly that such thing is a benefit for the workers, at the expense of the business and of the people who live farther from work and must wake up at 4 AM instead of 5 AM.

      DST is essentially unhealthy.

    40. Re:About time! (heh) by antdude · · Score: 1

      Daylight saving time (DST) is nice. Keep it FOREVER. Don't go back to standard time! ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    41. Re:About time! (heh) by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      I think you mean that Standard Time is a waste of time. Specifically, it wastes an hour of daylight while you're asleep.

    42. Re:About time! (heh) by cshamis · · Score: 1

      Just FYI: Standard time is in effect during the winter. DST is in the summer. Kids don't go to school in the summer. You're arguing against the natural time.

    43. Re:About time! (heh) by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would make more sense for them to not have to go to school in the dark, since that's when all the groggy drivers will be out.

      Though as someone else pointed out, days in the winter are short enough that you don't really have a choice in the matter. They either go to school in the dark, come home in the dark, or you can try and straddle it so they'd be coming home and going in during twilight.

  3. Damn - one year too late by mccalli · · Score: 4, Funny

    October 2018 (obviously impossible) would have enshrined this into the UK transitional period too. Haven't heard anything about what the UK will do - am really hoping we stop changing as well.

    I responded to the survey voting for 'stop changing', so I'm happy with this.

    1. Re:Damn - one year too late by GNious · · Score: 3, Funny

      According to Daily Mail, this change is only introduced to drive a wedge between UK and Ireland.
      Based on their reasoning, the UK will not be following EU on this matter.

    2. Re:Damn - one year too late by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

      It's worse than that because the UK will never be able to do this now without appearing to be following the EU lead which the brexiteers will deem completely unacceptable. The UK is probably now stuck with GMT and BST for the foreseeable future.

    3. Re:Damn - one year too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Since when did the Daily Mail ever do 'reasoning' ?
      All they care about is twisting things to make nice click-baity headlines to sell more papers to people who need to be told what they should be offended by today.
      TBH, I'm suprised they didn't make it out to be some Islamic plot to drive down house prices and cause cancer.

    4. Re:Damn - one year too late by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's worse than that because the UK will never be able to do this now without appearing to be following the EU lead which the brexiteers will deem completely unacceptable.

      Well, without following the EU lead, the UK could hold a referendum and ask its people what they want.

      A referendum was how the UK decided to brexit() in the first place.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re: Damn - one year too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, I think you are confusing the DM with the Guardian.

    6. Re:Damn - one year too late by Miamicanes · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From what I've heard, the problem in Britain is that almost everyone prefers BST to GMT, but there's an equally-strong nostalgic draw to being on GMT for at least a few months per year... an enduring reminder that Britain was once the literal center and reference point of the civilized world, and everyone *else* defined their local time relative to London's time.

      I suspect France will have a similar national dilemma. It didn't get to name GMT, but it DID get to name UTC (or at least, SI did). Europe's geopolitical center might have shifted eastward after Germany reunified and the EU grew... but as long as France gets to have UTC for a few months per year, it can still feel smugly superior and regard itself as the world's timekeeping reference point. Moving to CET year-round would be yet another psychological concession that continental Europe no longer revolves around Paris.

      Predictions:

      1. France will stick with UTC for the sake of national pride initially, decide it hates early sunsets, and join the rest of Europe in UTC+1 within a couple of years.

      2. Britain will come up with a solution worthy of a Terry Pratchett novel... UTC+1 year-round, except on Boxing Day. On Boxing Day, clocks will be turned back an hour sometime early in the morning, solar noon will occur at 12:00 GMT somewhere in Britain (often in London, occasionally near the site of the Greenwich Observatory itself (or at least, somewhere above its parking lot, since the actual meridian is a few hundred feet away from the "ceremonial" meridian's painted line), then clocks will skip from 22:59:59 GMT to 00:00:00 UTC+1, ensuring that the madness & confusion persist for only a single calendar day.

      The first year, everyone will think it's cute in the days leading up to it, the day itself will end with thousands of people missing flights and trains due to mass confusion about whether or not the time change is a joke, and a few weeks later Parliament will quietly pass a law making Britain UTC+1 year-round, except for the literal sites of the Greenwich Observatory and Stonehenge (which will be GMT year-round... preserving the symbolism, while sparing 99.999% of Britain's population from having to deal with its consequences).

    7. Re:Damn - one year too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      France never gets to have UTC, what are you on about?

    8. Re:Damn - one year too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      France is on UTC+1 or UTC+2 depending on the time of the year. It will be on either UTC+1 or UTC+2 after the change.
      My bet is that France will stick to whatever Germany is on, because.

    9. Re: Damn - one year too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just using democracy makes us different to the EU.

    10. Re: Damn - one year too late by foobar666 · · Score: 1

      Another solution is to use GMT all year but change work patterns by an hour. Lots of places have flexible or extended hours anyway: 9-5 is pretty rare.

    11. Re:Damn - one year too late by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      That went really well.

      Oh, wait, it was a complete disaster.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    12. Re: Damn - one year too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes things even more complicated.

      Usually you have a good idea of what office hours a place has, you just need to look up what timezone they are in.
      If you need to both look up timezone and what office hours they are going by this time of the year you will get cases where someone added/subtracted the numbers wrong.

      Of course, if every country switched to GMT and only office hours changed there would only be one thing to look up again.

    13. Re:Damn - one year too late by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The Daily Mail is basically

      - 5 Minutes Hate
      - Everything gives you cancer
      - Cute animals
      - Any excuse to show a sexy girl, even if she is 14

      Just that, relentlessly day after day, until your mind is corrupted.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Damn - one year too late by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's an economic disadvantage for the UK if it doesn't stop using DST.

      Every time that change happens there is a cost. Stuff breaks, time and effort has to be put in to making sure stuff doesn't break, every system has to be set up to allow that cha

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Damn - one year too late by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      UTC was a compromise between the French and British. The French wanted CTU (temps universel coordonné) and the British wanted CUT (coordinated universal time), so they settled on UTC that doesn't stand for anything.

      If the UK gets a deal then presumably it will make the switch too as part of the brexit transition period. If not... Well, they will be too busy trying to save their economy from a massive recession and huge layoffs to care.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:Damn - one year too late by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      You know, if they got rid of the first 2 in that list, they could be even more successful.

    17. Re:Damn - one year too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it not make more sense to settle on UTC+0.5?

      I originally heard this as part of a stand-up act years ago, but it does seem like the most sensible compromise between the different time zones.

      Personally I'm looking forward to a system that doesn't flip-flop twice a year, and professionally I followed the only two rules of programming that matter:

      1. Don't work on calendar code
      2. Don't work on localization code.

      [whoops, I'm not logged in]

    18. Re: Damn - one year too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing the exact same thing as the EU makes the UK different from the EU?

    19. Re:Damn - one year too late by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      They have to have the other stuff to justify the photos of girls and women. A lot of it is "health" stories that are basically body shaming and anxiety inducing crap where they write about the 5 year old children of celebrities wearing designer clothes and eating sweets like any normal 5 year old would.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:Damn - one year too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but that is a terrible idea.

      The one thing that became obvious about the brexit referendum is how divisive such a vote can be. Brexit has split the country in two and it's going to be a long time before that is healed.

    21. Re: Damn - one year too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      void EU() {
          while(true) { // some good stuff going on
          }
      }

      void handle_referendum_interrupt() {
          if (idiot_voters()) {
              if (governing_party() == TORIES) {
                  brexit(1); // non-zero exit
              } else {
                  brexit(0); // clean Brexit
              }
          } // Intelligent voters - noop here and // focus on real issues
      }
         

    22. Re:Damn - one year too late by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      It's an economic disadvantage for the UK if it doesn't stop using DST.

      It's a massive economic disadvantage for the UK if it doesn't stop Brexit. There is no sign of that happening and I doubt the effect of DST will be noticeable on top of that.

  4. Maybe not all of europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Every European country will decide whether they do it or not. Some countries are still hesitating.

    1. Re:Maybe not all of europe by Streetlight · · Score: 2

      If I read the OP correctly, countries can decide which time zone they're in but not change twice a year. Am I wrong?

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    2. Re:Maybe not all of europe by aliquis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I hate people saying "I prefer day light savings time because <reasons>."

      Why?

      Because the clock already have a definition which make sense.
      12 is the middle of the day. Sun as near zenith as it can be.
      00 is the complete opposite. Sun as far away as possible.
      As soon as the clock pass 00:00:00 you're moving towards the brighter part instead of the darker part.

      It's symmetrical and make logical sense.

      I totally understand if some people wish they had more light hours after work or if current schedules are setup so that they are more awake in the evening than in the morning for whatever reason and as such prefer it that way. But that's all changeable without messing with the clock and how that the earths rotation around the sun. Let 00 be when you are turned away from the sun and 12 be when you are turned against it still. As for all that other crap change that if you want too. If you want to maximize sun hours why aren't people going to bed at 20 and up at 04 instead for instance? Totally achievable. You don't have to screw up the clock for that!

      "But it's so much work! It's easier to just change the clock!"
      I guess that could be argued vs the current setup where we move the clock twice per year. It's likely less work to change those things once and then stop doing those changes than doing those changes all the time but not changing opening hours and what not.
      But yeah. It would be a bit of work. But definitely not something which can be done. And yeah, if we stuck with winter time all the time it likely would make sense to change things around one hour because as is summer time run for a longer time than winter time so that's the more common hours for things, so what we are used to and it's fine keeping it like those in the winter too. ... but change the times/schedules/opening hours/.. not the definitions for how a freaking clock work.

      And if you are going to change the clock anyway then change it to 1000 hours, 1000 minutes and 1000 seconds ir 10 of each while at it because that would make more sense than especially the analog clock which do two rotations in one day and the am and pm crap you people got in some societies.

    3. Re:Maybe not all of europe by Cipheron · · Score: 1

      They only get to decide between permanent summer or winter time, they don't get to keep the daylight savings system.

    4. Re:Maybe not all of europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You might want to (a) realise that not everyone gets to choose their work hours and (b) 1200 is not solar maximum in any timezone for the entire year for any location. Do try harder.

    5. Re:Maybe not all of europe by lgw · · Score: 2

      Set the clocks where ever it makes people happy, just stop changing them. The idea that there's some objective reason to have 12 be at some particular time of day is nonsense.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:Maybe not all of europe by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Actually the article s false.
      Obviously.

      As long as the european parliament has not decided on it: nothing is going to happen.

      And the "european commission" did not even file a bill yet ... so if there will be a change, it will be in 4 or 8 years or further in future.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:Maybe not all of europe by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      Set the clocks where ever it makes people happy, just stop changing them.

      Great -- let's set all of the clocks to 5PM local time and never let them change again!

      (WD40 for when is should move, and Duck Tape for when it shouldn't.)

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    8. Re: Maybe not all of europe by foobar666 · · Score: 1

      Society could just have "main" office hours being 8-4 rather than 9-5. Lots of places don't even do 9-5 anyway.

    9. Re: Maybe not all of europe by foobar666 · · Score: 1

      Who cares about the European Parliament? They have about as much power as a dead haddock. The question is... Why is this change being pushed so hard now, although they have their "poll" almost zero publicity? You might have noticed that the EU has many massively more critical problems on its plate at the moment!

    10. Re: Maybe not all of europe by houghi · · Score: 1

      We are not changing the vlock. We are not changing time. We are looking if we better like summer or winter time.

      The fact that 12:00 is when thee sun used to be above your head is nice, bit just for historical reasons. There are not many places where this us the case. There are plenty of countries that would be devided by a timeline, so cheating is going on anywa

      Besides that, I do not see a lot of people staring at a stick in the ground to see when midday is. Tried it once and I was 17 minutes late all the time.

      I would think most people would like extra daylight in the summer, because they will be outside. In the winter you will be inside because of the weather.

      I am just glad that it us over and will be happy as long as countries close to Belgium have the same time.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:Maybe not all of europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...]1200 is not solar maximum in any timezone for the entire year for any location. [...]

      You want to elaborate on this? Yes, if you are on the edges of a timezone, the time point of solar maxima part doesn't go well (it will still be more or less around 12.00, but not to the second), but "the entire year" is false. The solar maxima is still true, but the maxima will vary over the year because of the tilt of the earth.

    12. Re: Maybe not all of europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides that, I do not see a lot of people staring at a stick in the ground to see when midday is. Tried it once and I was 17 minutes late all the time.

      Funny anecdote... and at the same time totally irrelevant. If what you advocate is true, why have a standardized time at all. Why not let every city or part of town make up their own prefered time and stick to that?

      Oh, there are advantages to having a coherent standard, even if it doesn't strictly follow "nature".

      I would think most people would like extra daylight in the summer, because they will be outside. In the winter you will be inside because of the weather.

      Well, you might think so. But then you are thinking in a very narrowminded way. The people that initiated this movement, the Finns, are living at a place where DST is bullshit. Within a week and a half of switching from standard time to summer time, that change is eaten up by the rapid change in the day length at those latitudes. That is, wait 10 days or so and you have that extra hour of sunlight anyway. In the summer, northern Europe can have 20+ hours of daylight. So the people living there do not have a problem with having access to too little daylight in the summer, there is way too much. The sun will rise several hours before you wake up, even if you are a construction worker, and set several hours after most Europeans expect it to.

      And in the winter the opposite is true. So if one really wanted people to have daylight we would switch the clock 5 or 6 hours so that the poor sods up in the north could at least get an hour or two of sunlight after the working day is over. But that is kind of stupid.

      Now that you have been enlightened of how someone else might live, can you think again?

      Near the equator, DST is also bullshit, the length of the day vary very little. So it is in two relatively narrow belts that the DST makes some sense, and only one of these belts have some serious population. But it is not worth changing the clocks everywhere just for this.

    13. Re:Maybe not all of europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to (a) realise that not everyone gets to choose their work hours and (b) 1200 is not solar maximum in any timezone for the entire year for any location. Do try harder.

      (a) Practically everyone has more control over their working hours than whether or not the clocks are officially changed. If propositioning one's boss is a pointless exercise (low chance of making a difference), then responding to this survey was utterly meaningless (basically zero chance of making a difference).

      (b) There is a relationship between Solar noon and 12:00pm even if solar noon does oscillate around 12:00pm and only for one line per timezone. Relative to the uglinesses involved here, changing the concept of time arbitrarily through the year is bonkers.

    14. Re:Maybe not all of europe by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      For a long time now, our days haven't been in phase with the solar day. The time we are awake extends far more into the PM than the AM. Following this convention (as the DST-always folks propose) makes at least as much sense as trying to synchronize our clocks with a variable phenomenon like solar apex.
      Social convention is a powerful thing, and now that we don't depend on the Sun to calculate time, we can choose a time standard that suits our lives, instead of the other way round.

    15. Re: Maybe not all of europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common here is 8-13 ("5") which includes a 1 hour lunch.

    16. Re: Maybe not all of europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Germany will decide and the rest of the continent will follow. What good does it do your economy if you are in a different time zone than the biggest player? Think transports. Think business. Think money. Mark my words: Germany will decide. As always.

    17. Re:Maybe not all of europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12 is the middle of the day. Sun as near zenith as it can be.

      Thats right, during summer its ~12:00 for 74 days straight in the Northern parts of the Nordics. A bit inconvenient, but makes the most sense.

    18. Re:Maybe not all of europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's about a coordinated effort across society. Kids may show up to school an hour earlier, but unless the teachers are there, it won't do them any good.

      I'd vote against DST personally, but if we are going to do it, changing everyone's clock (especially since many digital clocks perform this automagically) is an efficient way of coordinating it.

    19. Re: Maybe not all of europe by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      All the power in Europe comes from the European Parliament.

      No idea why you believe otherwise.

      The question is... Why is this change being pushed so hard now, although they have their "poll" almost zero publicity?

      It is not pushed, it is only in the news, for what ever reason. Most people don't like the time shift, but as you correctly point out, we have more important things that matter, e.g. BREXIT, the greek crisis, Portugal also still has trouble, and Italy has an absurd unemployment rate which they fake down by manipulating the numbers.

      And obviously we hardly can handle the immigrations coming via the mediterranean sea.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    20. Re: Maybe not all of europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8-17?

    21. Re:Maybe not all of europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason people around here like daylight savings is the extra hour to drink in the fall. 2am, bar time, ohh wait, 1am again. Regardless of daylight savings, go to school/work and it's dark, head home and it's dark. +-1 hour won't make a difference.

    22. Re:Maybe not all of europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally understand if some people wish they had more light hours after work

      I want the exact opposite. During the summer, I want to go to my car after the sun has been down for an hour so my car isn't a furnace. I want to not have to drive home with the sun in my eyes or rear-view mirror (thus eyes again). I want to not have to wait until it's 10PM before I can walk outside without the deadly skin cancer laser in the sky.

      captcha is sports. screw sports.

    23. Re:Maybe not all of europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a Doctor Who episode like that...

    24. Re:Maybe not all of europe by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Waking up at 07 and going to bed at 23 doesn't interfere with anything though.

      It's totally possible to use those times rather than 20 and 04 if you want to while using winter time.

      It's not a problem. But if you think it is then it's fine to wake up and go to bed at some other hours too.

      Let the clock be and do whatever at whatever time just as people already do.

      The clock doesn't have to be moved forward three hours to make it like 20-04, you could adjust the clock so that most people would go to bed at 00 too if you wanted.

      I do have problems with the clock but my problem is the two lapses per day on an analog clock and the 24 hours but to some extent also 60 minutes and seconds which make it harder to do calculations than if we used something based on 10.

      10 hours, 10 minutes, 10 seconds per day = only 1000 time units = the smallest one would be 1 minute and 26.4 seconds long which would make it easier to come in time since it's so imprecise but .. it would also be very imprecise =P

      1000 hours and 1000 minutes and 1000 seconds though would make 1 minute 0.0864 seconds long so would be far more accurate than what we have now, even just using minutes.

      08:00:00 would be 333:333:333.
      But yeah, waking up at 300 hours would be accurate enough I guess ..

      (Yeah I'm European..)

    25. Re:Maybe not all of europe by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Even if the sun doesn't settle it still moves.
      Your point is wrong and it's not what I said.
      Also I live in Sweden so I'm well aware of the phenomena.

    26. Re:Maybe not all of europe by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Because it's about a coordinated effort across society. Kids may show up to school an hour earlier, but unless the teachers are there, it won't do them any good.

      Meaning the parents and the teachers wouldn't be told when the day start or what?

      Here in Sweden summer time is 25th March - 28th October this year or 7 months.
      Seem like in DST it's 11th March - 4th November so almost 8 months.
      Because of that DST seem to be a larger part of the year than standard time and considering more people seem to favor it my suggestion would be to make standard / winter time what's used at all times but that society decided to adjust all schedules one hour back once and for all everywhere resulting in the same effect as always being on DST but with more work but with the hours of the day defined just as they are.

      I'm pretty sure a school can deal with "after this date we start at 07 instead."

      I'd vote against DST personally, but if we are going to do it, changing everyone's clock (especially since many digital clocks perform this automagically) is an efficient way of coordinating it.

      Yeah I understand the convenience factor but it's not like it's totally impossible to change opening hours otherwise. I've seen stores do it with stickers on the door .. And if you feel like it's too much work you can keep your current hours too.

    27. Re:Maybe not all of europe by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Well, as someone on a somehwat voluntarily (though actually likely TV controller) 14-06 schedule I understand part of that.

      Then again here the shortest days will almost only be like 10-14 and the longest 02-22 if they didn't fucked up the time plus you get some light also at other times so regardless of when the day start as long as it's consistent along the year some days you'd get the sun light in the mirror, some days it would be dark, some days the sun would be very high. So to adopt for what you want the time of the day would have to change a lot here =P

    28. Re:Maybe not all of europe by aliquis · · Score: 1

      How is it nonsense?

      Also I as someone often missing out on a lot of sun time but also being awake in summer mornings definitely use it as a measure for figuring out how much I've missed or how long it will be dark and what not.

      Maybe living here where days and nights can be both so very short and so very long make it more important whatever it is and how than living close to the equator and having a bit of both all the time.

      If you'd ask me new year should start at the darkest day of the year and our midsummer at the longest and in the middle of the calendar year too. It would make more sense and be more symmetrical.

    29. Re:Maybe not all of europe by aliquis · · Score: 1

      But closer than 13 and 11 for most?

      You don't get to choose work hours whatever one go with DST or not so .. nothing changes there.
      If the majority want things like on DST though then just deciding "let's adjust all schedules one hour this one time" would be doable.

      Over here they changed from left hand to right hand traffic once in 1969. Sure that involved some work that one time but it was done and now people drive on the right side of the road instead.

      If companies didn't got more directives and rule by governments than changing their schedules one hour one time I assume they would had been very happy.

    30. Re:Maybe not all of europe by jwdb · · Score: 1

      If you're on the edge of the time zone, the solar maximum will almost always be at 11:30 or 12:30, not "more or less around 12:00".

      As far as "for the entire year", look up the Analemma, linked below. Essentially, the location of the sun at 12:00 at any given point on the Earth shifts East and West throughout the year, such that even in the middle of the time zone, 12:00 is the solar maximum only twice a year.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    31. Re: Maybe not all of europe by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I definitely like winter time better because it's the right time.

      As for how to schedule my day that become theoretical. Theoretically I think it make sense to maximize the sun hours but in reality I definitely don't and may not even go to bed before the sun has started to show and sleep through a large part of the show. Obviously I like the night a bit too. Or maybe I just need the darkness to get tired? Maybe by theoretical idea of what I "want" is completely wrong and it's darkness before going to bed I actually want.

      As for countries and 12 when the sun is above your head I guess is explain a bit by where I live. Since Sweden has the shape it have. I can understand things are different in the wider countries.

    32. Re:Maybe not all of europe by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      12 is the middle of the day. Sun as near zenith as it can be.

      I call bullshit.

    33. Re: Maybe not all of europe by houghi · · Score: 1

      But it is not worth changing the clocks everywhere just for this.

      I do not want to change every time. I personally do not care if summer time or winter time is selected. No matter if it is winter or summer time. (That is what it is called in Europe) Having summer time all the time is just as good, FOR ME, as wintertime all the time.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    34. Re:Maybe not all of europe by lgw · · Score: 1

      How is it nonsense?

      Any convention we humans adopt to enumerate time is arbitrary. There's no first principles here. There's no goal to be satisfied beyond human happiness. Making a few time nerds with OCD happy is fine, but making the bulk of humanity happy is better.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    35. Re:Maybe not all of europe by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      [...metric time...]

      Easier to throw out hours and minutes entirely and just use the official metric base unit for time as it is. One kilosecond (16.7 minutes) would be the primary interval for scheduling purposes; 7 AM would become 25ks, 1:30 PM would be 50ks, and 9 PM would be 75ks. The 8-5 workday would run from 30-60ks. Tenths (0.1ks = 100s) would take the place of minutes.

      The length of the day varies anyway depending on leap seconds and the like. Approximately 86.4ks is good enough IMHO.

      One interesting variation would be to define zero as sunrise rather than midnight (plus or minus 2-3ks to keep nearby areas on the same time, similar to time zones), which would mean that the length of the day, measured from sunrise to sunrise, would vary throughout the year. Negative numbers would denote earlier times (-4ks ~= an hour before sunrise). This is a bit more complex, but since it naturally follows the start of daylight it avoids the need for sharp adjustments to either timekeeping or schedules between summer and winter.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  5. " stop the twice-yearly changing of clocks" by Chuq · · Score: 2

    How hard is it to use the phrase "daylight saving"?

    --
    - Chuq
    1. Re:" stop the twice-yearly changing of clocks" by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Very hard, since it's a lie and does not save daylight at all.

    2. Re:" stop the twice-yearly changing of clocks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe we should compromise, only change the clocks once a year.

    3. Re:" stop the twice-yearly changing of clocks" by rsborg · · Score: 2

      Very hard, since it's a lie and does not save daylight at all.

      That's why you use phrases like "so-called" or "quaintly referred to as" to note your usage of inaccurate terminology that somehow happens to be what everyone calls it.

      As it's titled it's bizarre since lots of folks know what "daylight savings" "spring forward" and "fall back" means but are confused about what "changing the clocks" may indicate - is it upgrade time?

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    4. Re:" stop the twice-yearly changing of clocks" by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Some of us don't want to dignify the lie by using the label intended to brain-wash.

    5. Re:" stop the twice-yearly changing of clocks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This might be a US or English language saying, in French it's just Winter time and Summer time. "daylight savings time" maybe is something a clock setting GUI in a linux distro will talk me about if I installed it in English to save a few megabytes of disk space.

    6. Re:" stop the twice-yearly changing of clocks" by santiago · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Daylight saving" is also primarily an Americanism, with most of Europe referring to the local equivalent as "summer time".

    7. Re: " stop the twice-yearly changing of clocks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because DST is changing the clocks to be 1 hour offset from the (roughly) apparent position of the sun.
      You can do it permanently, like some idiots are proposing, never do it, do it twice a year, do it twice a day, etc.

      Also, you're not saving daylight, the name is intentionally misleading. What you're doing is shifting regular work hours by changing the clocks instead of just changing your fucking hours of business.

    8. Re:" stop the twice-yearly changing of clocks" by DarkLordBelial · · Score: 1

      I think here in the UK the phrase "Changing the Clocks" is far more common than "Daylight Saving". Certainly in the part if England I am from. I can't speak for the rest of Europe.

    9. Re: " stop the twice-yearly changing of clocks" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so hard apparently, since only Americans do it.

  6. Changing the clocks? by PPH · · Score: 1

    Oh, this is about daylight savings time. I thought they wanted to dial them back to 1941.

    Never mind.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  7. Giant survey no one knows about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even though I like the survey's result it's just weird to hear about it after the fact. Try sending us letters if you want us to participate. Perhaps I'm not a social media user and I don't speak German, so even if I have the Internet I won't hear about it.

    1. Re:Giant survey no one knows about by mccalli · · Score: 1

      You're a Slashdot reader. I heard about it from here.

    2. Re:Giant survey no one knows about by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I heard about it earlier and had an idea for how I wanted to vote but then I forgot about it until they revealed the result.

      With 80% German votes clearly coverage has been bigger in Germany than elsewhere.

      4(?) million people, 80% Germans = 3.2 million Germans.
      3.9% of German population voted if that's the case.
      0.2% of the rest of the EU population.
      Yay...

  8. So... summer or winter time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Winter (non-daylight-savings) would be logical, but the summary indicates that permanent daylight savings (summer) time is also an option, so which is it?

    And yes, I RTFA (well, skimmed anyhow), and the article linked in TFA, but neither offered clarity.

    I guess either beats the horrible "let's all get up an hour earlier for some reason, possibly because we're all masochists who enjoy stumbling around in the dark every morning" day that comes every spring, but it would be nice to know.

  9. "Harmonized" goose-stepping. (Newspeak) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think changing clocks makes no sense.

    But if that "harmonized" isn't newspeak, then I don't know what is.
    How about letting every community decide for itself?
    They can still cooperate. That is not the point. Cooperation of course is usually good.
    The point is that they should not be FORCED to conform. Because it is not ALWAYS good, and there is no actual reason to enforce conformism, except bureaucratic totalitarianism.

    Soviet-era goose-stepping must be the most "harmonic" think ever seen to people like him. The Prussians would be proud.
    Disgusting.

    1. Re:"Harmonized" goose-stepping. (Newspeak) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe "uniformed" was seen to militaristic, and "unified" as too unionistic? ;)

  10. Compromise: UK to set back to 1939, EU to 2019 by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Problem solved.

    In Scotland they'll be set to Scotch Time and in NI they'll be set to Whiskey Time, of course.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Compromise: UK to set back to 1939, EU to 2019 by maglor_83 · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Scotland they'll be set to Scotch Time and in NI they'll be set to Whiskey Time, of course.

      Why would you set your time to 'All the time'?

    2. Re:Compromise: UK to set back to 1939, EU to 2019 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is miller time also acceptable? Because that's what time it is here.

  11. Can you just STOP .... by ben_kelley · · Score: 1

    messing with daylight saving. I don't mind if you have daylight saving, or if you don't, just stop changing you mind!

    1. Re:Can you just STOP .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the point... to stop changing.

  12. They already have. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The EU is the successor of the BeNeLux, which itself is the successor to Luxemburg, the country created solely as a tax haven for the former and current royalty, to hide cash from the kings/emperors. My home country, by the way.
    And the predecessor to TTIP/CETA.
    In any generation, the sole point is for the current royalty (rich people, which, if you look at history, are from the line of royalty), to elevate themselves above the sovereignty of the people over their home areas. To replace the actual government and state by one controlled by them and their corporation. Or, to use that term that Mussolini coined for what he described as "the merger of state and industry": Fascism. (Real definition of the word.)

    1. Re:They already have. by PPH · · Score: 1

      Nothing unique about Luxembourg or Benelux. Britain has numerous overseas territories (Cayman Islands, Channel Islands) that are autonomous enough that, although they depend on the home country for their continued existence, there just doesn't seem to be anything anyone can do pierce banking privacy laws and tax shelters. France has Monaco. The USA has Delaware and Texas.

      Nobody is stupid enough to actually strangle the classes that create wealth by not giving them a foot out of the tax door, so to speak.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:They already have. by The1stImmortal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nobody is stupid enough to actually strangle the classes that create wealth by not giving them a foot out of the tax door, so to speak.

      Nitpick - they don't create wealth, they're merely major redistributors of wealth. They're the pumps, not the sources.

    3. Re:They already have. by anti-pop-frustration · · Score: 1

      Nobody is stupid enough to actually strangle the classes that create wealth by not giving them a foot out of the tax door, so to speak.

      If you're rich, paying taxes is the equivalent of 'being strangled', it follows that in order to avoid the life threatening injury of having slightly less money, the rich must do what they have to in order to survive. They have to evade taxes, otherwise they wouldn't be able to keep breathing.

      Whereas, if you are middle or working class, you are used to living with little to no money (and a lot of debt), therefore paying taxes is totally safe for you, it won't hurt you in any way.

      Can you even imagine a society in which tax law is actually enforced, a society in which the insanely rich are moderately impaired in their ability to get insanely richer? It simply wouldn't work.

    4. Re:They already have. by PPH · · Score: 1

      in order to avoid the life threatening injury of having slightly less money

      Rich people will always be able to afford the dues at Mar-a-Lago. That comes out of discretionary income. What they can't afford is some local taxing authority shaving just enough off their businesses bottom line to make relocation to a cheaper jurisdiction beneficial.

      Whereas, if you are middle or working class

      You are stuck here behind an economic Iron Curtain. You can't move your income and you must shop at the company store. That being the market segment created by regulations, supposedly to protect you. But actually put in place to keep you from buying Canadian drugs or a Porsche from a German dealership.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  13. Sun sets "later" but also rises "later". by mark-t · · Score: 1

    And in the middle of winter, when you go far enough north, the sun sets early enough that even with an extra hour of daylight at the end of it, it will still be after sunset by the time most people might need to go home from work.

    And if the sun is rising that much later in the winter, the lack of any sunlight in the morning almost certainly badly affect melatonin cycles and probably worsen seasonal depression disorder.

    I can sympathize with wanting an extra hour of daylight in the evenings, but as soon as you get more than about 45 degrees away from the equator or so, the sun is already rising late enough as it is in the winter months, and in practice, one wouldn't be able to enjoy the extra hour of daylight at the end of the day in the winter either, because they would probably be at work until sunset anyways.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting that we leave DST as it is, I think that the abomination should be abolished forever, but I firmly believe that we should stay on standard time, and not simply shift the middle of the day to 1PM. You might be able to convince me to shift clocks forward only half an hour only once, and one last time to split the difference, but I don't know if I've been really sold on that yet.

    Noon should be as close as is reasonably possible to the middle of the day, not an hour before it (or else you may as well call it 12AM, considering what AM and PM mean, since that is what it would always be if we settled on using DST year-round).

    1. Re:Sun sets "later" but also rises "later". by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      I can sympathize with wanting an extra hour of daylight in the evenings, but as soon as you get more than about 45 degrees away from the equator or so, the sun is already rising late enough as it is in the winter months, and in practice, one wouldn't be able to enjoy the extra hour of daylight at the end of the day in the winter either, because they would probably be at work until sunset anyways.

      No. That's not why.
      I don't get to enjoy my extra hour of sunlight because I have to shovel all that goddamn snow!!

      --
      I tend to rant.
    2. Re:Sun sets "later" but also rises "later". by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Best piece of advice, buy a snowblower. The older you get the more you appreciate it, especially when the sun is just coming up at 8am and is setting at 4:30pm. I sure don't miss living further north, I mean the summers were great, the sun really doesn't go down at all and at best you've got 1.5h of twilight, but the whole 5hrs of daylight in the winter gets to be kinda annoying after awhile. Especially since the roads are closer to "plowed, and coated with sand and gravel" and the next nearest city is 5hrs away.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:Sun sets "later" but also rises "later". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia experimented with keeping permanent summer time since 2011 till 2014. The experiment failed. There were many complaints. For example, in Moscow in December/January it was full daylight only at 10AM. In 2014 they changed it to "always winter time".

    4. Re:Sun sets "later" but also rises "later". by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Hahaha funny you'd say that. I recently bought a house and one of the conditions was to get their snowblower with the purchase. Bring on the snow!!

      --
      I tend to rant.
  14. How you know the survey was fake: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "three million of those respondents were from Germany"

    That's 3.6% of the population of Germany. No way in hell such a high percentage responded to an obscure survey on some EU commission website.

  15. Standard Time forever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I consider myself a "purist" and wish that we'd just stop using DST completely and just go with "winter" time year-round.

    The more south you go, the less "saving" daylight is needed since there's less daylight variance between the seasons.

    The more north you go the more "extreme" sunrises would get if you use "summer" time (DST) in the winter. Once you get into longitude 40N range (NYC, Detroit, Toronto), if you use 'summer time' in the winter you get sunrise at 8:30. Sunsets will be at 5:30 instead of 4:30, and that's hardly worth much IMHO.

    We have electrical lights now: is it that big of a deal that it gets dark "sooner"? The last time it was really dark in an urban area was giant 2003 blackout. I'd rather have earlier sunrises, as otherwise people's circadian rhythms are going to all sorts of fucked up (especially dangerous while driving).

    1. Re:Standard Time forever! by Moskit · · Score: 1

      Sadly it seems that many people prefer to stay in "summer time", which is also supported by "stop changing clocks in October" statement.

      This doesn't get rid of DST, it gets rid of time changes, but whether a country is stuck in DST or normal time is a separate matter.

  16. c6gunner IMPERSONATING me again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    c6gunner your FAKEname's on a post impersonating me & worse is you altering /. user's words https://linux.slashdot.org/com... as I challenged you to show you do better work and you can't after you tried to mock me you hypocrite LYING loser https://linux.slashdot.org/com... .

    * You're online FAKENAME trash c6gunner & a childish dishonest punk...

    PUTTING WORDS IN MY MOUTH TOO saying what I don't on spectre/meltdown https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... & I haven't had a MacOS X version recompiled for me yet (I don't own a Mac but I have a friend who does & can code (to a good extent, good enough to load FreePascal 3.0.4 + patches & Lazarus 1.8.2 IDE for it in 64-bit to do so but he is a BUSY guy, just waiting on him for it to do this as a FAVOR to me...))

    APK

    P.S.=> Impossible to deny FACT of your FAKEname (for your FAKE wasted lie of a so-called life) on that 1st post link above you unbelievable loser... apk

  17. EU != Continent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just sayin.

    1. Re:EU != Continent by jouassou · · Score: 1

      The European Economic Area countries usually follow the regulation by the European Union anyway. Excluding those, the non-EU countries left on the continent are basically Switzerland, Ukraine, Belarus, the Balkan states, and some city states (I don't count Russia and Turkey). Belarus is in the same timezone as western Russia, while the rest follow Central European Time or Eastern European Time. I'd expect everyone but Belarus to discard DST for practical reasons if the rest of the countries in the CET and EET blocks switch.

      So although I agree that the European Union doesn't span the continent, in practice the entire continent except Belarus will probably end up getting rid of DST in the near future.

  18. software updates will go well... bureaucracy by johnjones · · Score: 1

    so think of all the scheduling software... update it all for 2019... not going to happen

    this is just a bureaucracy of consultations... what do you think they will be doing... paying themselves and ?
    lets say germany changed and france was delayed by 2 years... do you think business would not suffer ?

    it requires all member states to change then updates to all software that keeps the time, no matter how lofty the goal it just is not going to happen.

    regards

    John Jones

    1. Re:software updates will go well... bureaucracy by fplant · · Score: 1

      The last change that we make in the US was implemented in a couple of years, so it's really not a big change.

      Here in Arizona we have to deal with everybody else seemingly arbitrarily changing their clocks, so it is possible to deal with it, and it's really not that bad.

      The sooner everybody wakes up and realizes that there's not need to change clocks the better IMO.

    2. Re:software updates will go well... bureaucracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are several changes a year worldwide. I can't find a true changelog, but the tz-announce mailing list gives you some idea.

  19. For you ze DST ist ofer by julian67 · · Score: 1

    Hande hoch!
    First ze big hand hoch zen ze little hand hoch!
    For you ze DST ist ofer.

  20. Daylight Savings Time is Stupid by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    Set the clocks to optimize for winter, and just be done with it.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  21. Time to be done with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least the EU could make a decision on this. Congress is so inept it couldn't possible be so flexible because you know one side or another would want some expensive study or table it for a special session or some BS. Here is a challenge Democrat's and Republican's. Find something you can all agree on. If that's even possible.

  22. 30 mins... a compromise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    just go forward 30 mins, and leave it there pemently.. best of both worlds.

    1. Re:30 mins... a compromise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just go forward 30 mins, and leave it there pemently.. best of both worlds.

      We do not accept half-measures around here!

  23. Why keep DST? by BarneyGuarder · · Score: 1

    I fully support ending the time changes, but using daylight savings time year-round is idiotic. That is just setting noon to 1PM. If we do this in the US, sunrise in New York will be about 8AM in the winter. Although the name implies it, daylight saving time does not actually make the day longer.

    1. Re:Why keep DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But it does move the sun time to when most people can use it. You might be privileged enough to have a job with flexible working hours, but most people do not.

    2. Re:Why keep DST? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 3, Funny

      Although the name implies it, daylight saving time does not actually make the day longer.

      Hah! Well I guess somebody better tell Mr Sun he can get back to his normal orbit* speed around our Earth during the winter time!

      *High Blood Pressure Warning: This comment may cause sudden spikes in blood pressure. If experiencing any chest pains or numbness, please consult a doctor immediately.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    3. Re: Why keep DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So change the goddamn time zone, instead of trying to tell me that high noon is 1pm.

    4. Re:Why keep DST? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      daylight saving time does not actually make the day longer.
      Actually it does.
      I mean, if you distinguish between day and night, the "day" part of the day and night is longer.

      At least for europeans. Only rare professions get up so early in morning that DST makes no difference.

      I for my part am rarely at my job before 10:00 ... so even in deep winter there is light outside, and with permanent DST I might even go home in light. And as I half live in Paris, it is quite nice to have a sunset, or the afterglow of it, at 22:30.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:Why keep DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't anthropomorphize the sun. He hates when you do that.

      And if you think global warming is a problem now, just wait for when the stars begin falling from the sky.

    6. Re:Why keep DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people might like to use sunrise to get up in the morning without their bodies telling them it's the middle of the night. And will anyone think of the school children?

  24. Sudden outbreak of common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know why it took so long, but finally common sense prevailed in EU.

  25. I must be the odd one out by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

    I would love for Brisbane to have DST. Especially now I have school age kids.

    I can be flexible with my work hours. Less so for my kids school hours.

    1. Re:I must be the odd one out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you know, schools could just change their start/end times to be more flexible with work hours?

  26. I hope the spaniards get their act together by williamyf · · Score: 1

    and move their timezone to GMT. they currently sit on gmt + 2, which does not suit thir geography (it was done on the whim of a dictator to "show support for germany").

    That, coupled with their weird times (3 hour lunch break starting at two) wreacks havoc on bussiness with the rest of europe, and the world...

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    1. Re:I hope the spaniards get their act together by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      No Good! I've known too many Spaniards.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:I hope the spaniards get their act together by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still valiantly holding on in his fight to remain dead.

    3. Re:I hope the spaniards get their act together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, the 3-hour lunch break is extremely rare. It's only for those business where it does not make sense to open right after lunchtime, but it makes sense to remain open till late in the evening, or in the South where there is extreme heat (40C - 104F).

      I don't know anyone who has a 3-hour lunch break. My father had a 1.5h lunch break to go home, but only because we lived in a relatively small town. In Madrid we used to have a 45min lunch break and go to lunch at 12.30 or 1 at the latest.

    4. Re:I hope the spaniards get their act together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrt. to changing to GMT, as "natural" as it sounds, it also makes Spain more distant from the rest of Europe, which I suspect might negatively impact its economy.

      I'm always been perfectly ok with the time in the far west of Spain, which is the area most affected by being in the wrong timezone. We had sunsets at 10.15 in the summer, and the sun rises at 9am at the latest in winter. Northern countries have it much worse and they are doing fine..

    5. Re:I hope the spaniards get their act together by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Setting the clock 2 hours forward in summer justifies the 2pm lunch break! (When in reality it's only 12 noon.)

    6. Re:I hope the spaniards get their act together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and move their timezone to GMT. they currently sit on gmt + 2, which does not suit thir geography (it was done on the whim of a dictator to "show support for germany").

      That, coupled with their weird times (3 hour lunch break starting at two) wreacks havoc on bussiness with the rest of europe, and the world...

      Who the hell are you to tell other people what they have to do?

      1. It's true that time was changed by fascist Franco to match nazi Germany, so what? The criticism of changing time twice a year, that affects people and animals, also would apply even more.
      2. I have never ever seen a 2 or 3 hour lunch break on office jobs, it's only done in retail and this is wrong, it must be changed, regardless of the time zone
      3. In western Spain, like Galicia, well, I think they should be able to chose their preferred timezone, probably would make more sense to be aligned with GMT and Portugal
      4. In Catalan-speaking Spain, it's extremely popular to have long afternoon and evening, most people praises it and embraces it. I think we should stay at +2 on summer
      5. The downside of being +2 is that on winter, the sun would rise at 09:00, so having the hour change to have sunrise at 08:00 is quite reasonable
    7. Re:I hope the spaniards get their act together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he's too much alive, unfortunately

  27. not what I heard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahem..."quite a few". Perhaps you meant "only a few", or you are just ignorant.
    Have it your way.

    1. Re:not what I heard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not the author of the post you're responding to, but thanks for the lesson on that English idiom.

      That said, that "quite a few" means a great number is a fine example of how much English is deranged.

    2. Re: not what I heard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a deliberate understatement. Akin to "a spot of bother". Leave the impression, such as "elegant", "deranged", "poetic", to the individual reader please.

    3. Re: not what I heard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when you understand the language it makes sense.

  28. It's not daylight saving by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    Since they take the hour away from us in the middle of the night, they are saving nighttime---not daylight.

  29. summer time versus DST by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    It is called daylight saving time in the US because it avoids confusion with the similarly-named "summertime" (referring to the time between spring and autumn). This may not be an issue with other languages.

    1. Re:summer time versus DST by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      You are right, it is not an issue in other languages, because the time between spring and autumn/fall is just called "summer", an not "summertime".

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  30. PLEASE scrap it in the USA by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    It's a PITA every year. Just set it and forget it! Old Indian chief once said...only white man think he could cut bottom of blanket, sew onto top and have longer blanket!

  31. Choice between summer is winter time!? by XXeR · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    Bulc said EU member states would have until April 2019 to decide whether they would permanently remain on summer or winter time.

    Wow. I get ditching DST, but make a call one way or the other across the board. This will get messy..

    1. Re:Choice between summer is winter time!? by mutantSushi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's really not, the choice of 'permanent summer/winter time' is really functionally identical to choosing a different time zone. So the forced choice meaning there is no "default" inertia is simply opportunity for Spain, France, Belgium, Netherlands and Luxembourg tio return to their 'natural' time zone (by longitude) 1 hr west of Germany/Italy/etc, which was only altered due to Nazi occupation. On the other side, if Poland wants to be 1 hour east of Germany in same zone as Baltics, that is plausible policy too. The thing is, every country has ALWAYS been able to designate it's time zone, that was never controlled by EU, and even before EU/EC countries tend to either be in same zone as neighbor, or 1 hr offset from immediate east/west. If you approach this as subjective preference re: summer/winter you might imagine patchwork of variation, but functionally it is no different than choosing a time zone, which countries have always approached pragmatically in relation to their neighbors. The borders of time zones may change somewhat, but they've done so before (in fact, creating the un-natural time situation for Spain as well as FR/BE/NE/LUX) and that isn't really anything to worry about.

    2. Re:Choice between summer is winter time!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other side, if Poland wants to be 1 hour east of Germany in same zone as Baltics, that is plausible policy too.

      Actually the centre of Central European time zone is right on the German-Polish border, so it wouldn't make much sense for Poland to change it.

  32. Proud of how this has been handled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, as a European I'm pretty happy about how this has been handled. We standarised things more than 20 years ago, gave the experiment a good run, people weren't happy about it, after some years of pressure and attempts to change this we held a poll (yes, Germans voted more than others, but millions of people participated, and the point is we did have a public consultation), the EU commission discussed it (that's 28 countries agreeing to do something, guys!), made a quick decision, and now had a vote. We'll coordinate to do this peacefully, and move forward as a group.

    It may not be perfect, and we have fights, but the EU is great. I love my fellow European citizens, and I love that we get so many countries and so many different people to agree on stuff (it takes time and patience, though.) From border control, educational standards, manufacturing requirements, safety, security, energy saving, rule of law... I don't understand why anyone would truly want out of it.

    1. Re:Proud of how this has been handled by mutantSushi · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it seems pretty reasonable. Now if it was more contested, perhaps it would make to sense to consider a national-population weighted poll (akin to EP seat allocation), but in fact I think the poll returned consistently high support from ALL but 2 countries (Greece and Cyprus), so even if German votes were ignored the result would be same. There seems some fuss about countries individually choosing summer/winter time, but that is perfectly appropriate and respectful of nations (or regions, like Corsica)... and isn't functionally different from countries choosing their own time zone, which they have always done, which I think many fail to grasp in focus on choice of winter vs summer. Curious to see if former WET re-emerges in at least some of Spain/France/Benelux. It would be weird if the UK was 1 hour east of France at least half the year, but AFAIK support for dropping clock adjustment is equally high in the UK, and no reason to thing there would be stranger result than when countries designated this completely independently. Well, maybe that was bad luck to write that :-).

    2. Re:Proud of how this has been handled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be weird if the UK was 1 hour east of France at least half the year, but AFAIK support for dropping clock adjustment is equally high in the UK, and no reason to thing there would be stranger result than when countries designated this completely independently.

      I'd laugh my ass off if the independent UK's first order of business is to do as the EU does....

  33. Re: c6gunner IMPERSONATING me again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love you APK. You are the cutest. I bet you're really cuddly.

  34. the revolution is here ! by Tom · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look, it took only a decade of pressure and a public petition with a majority reminiscent of old soviet style elections to strong-arm our politicians into doing one simple thing right.

    There may still be hope for this planet. At this speed, somewhere around 2350 they will decide that climate change is actually a bad thing and they ought to do something about it.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:the revolution is here ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sacrifice X to avoid natural catastrophes and get the weather we need. If X didn't have the intented result or the weather is still bad, try 2*X, 20*X or 10*Y. There is always a way to influence the weather by sacrificice, you must simply sacrifice more then. Those who oppose that are heathens that need to be dealt with."

      Man-made global warming has awkward similarities to ancient cults.

    2. Re:the revolution is here ! by Tom · · Score: 2

      It's not luck that 75% of the respondents were German.

      The petition was widely shared on german speaking social media. Other countries may have been less aggressive in that regard.

      the Germans see democracy as inefficient and illogical.

      "the Germans" includes me and I disagree with that statement. So please be more clear who you mean. The government? The administration? The people? The secret Nazi underground which still runs everything from their Inner Earth hiding spot?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    3. Re:the revolution is here ! by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      The secret Nazi underground which still runs everything from their Inner Earth hiding spot?

      Typical German, trying to conceal the truth. Everyone knows the secret Nazi underground is on the Moon.

    4. Re:the revolution is here ! by Tom · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows the secret Nazi underground is on the Moon.

      That, obviously, is the secret Nazi overground. We believe in redundancy.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  35. Good by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Winters are already miserable and shitty enough without suffering it getting dark at 4:30 in the afternoon. I think most people with the exception of farmers won't mind if there is an hour's more darkness at the beginning of the day instead.

    1. Re:Good by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should start your day earlier then. Wake up at 6 AM instead of 7 AM.

    2. Re:Good by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Why should I do that, when polls show the majority of people just want to abolish daylight savings, and now the EU agrees with that?

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that standard time puts sundown closer to 4:30PM than DST, right? Me, I'm happier with early sundown.

  36. There's no reason for BST. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just change the fucking hours. People got used to a 9-5 here the middle of the day is 1pm. change themto 8-4 and midday is 12 and you still finish that hour early you demand.
    Yet the ones against this idea are those who "think" so much of businesses that they don't want businesses to have the "cost" of changing their faceplate info on opening times... because that would be "government interference in private industry" or some shit.

  37. AIn't going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do people honestly think with all the anti-EU / anti-establishment feelings going on that a law that was decided by an online vote which over 70% of the voters were Germans is going to be enacted in each member state?

    People are waking up to the fact that Germany is pretty much the only EU country with a massive trade surplus, whilst all the other member states have to enact austerity measures to satisfy Germany and at the same time continue to buy German goods as fast as they can with credit supplied by Germany of course.

    So good luck with getting that law implemented.

  38. Not everyone got to choose their DST either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet somehow businesses still got to be told hen DST happened and did it. So why can't they be told when midday is? Why are businesses the only ones who get to say when you work and will mulishly insist that they will STAY 9-5 because that is what they did when the clocks were changing?

  39. Why will businesses refuse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why will businesses refuse to change to 8-4 when there is no DST changes? When DST was intruduced, why was it not a disaster because nobody got to choose their working hours? ALL the business has to do is change the Opening Hours panel. Job done. Once. They changed the clocks twice a year. Why will they refuse to do that???

  40. oh dear by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    this is gonna be a bigger mess than daylightsaving itself.. I really hope they set it to wintertime, as summertime is murder, a lot of studies shown that summertime is contra our bio rhythm, but leave it up to moronic politicians to go against those studies and choose summertime, because they think that's cool..

  41. FALSE 100% by gDLL · · Score: 1

    They 100% do create wealth. It's like saying we don't create cars, we just redistribute all the metals and plastics that make up the car.

  42. I'm a big gay baby... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a big gay baby.
    I make a doodee in my nappy.
    See what I'm HOSTing.
    APK

  43. c6gunner IMPERSONATING me again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    c6gunner your FAKEname's on a post impersonating me & worse is you altering /. user's words https://linux.slashdot.org/com... as I challenged you to show you do better work and you can't after you tried to mock me you hypocrite LYING loser https://linux.slashdot.org/com... .

    * You're online FAKENAME trash c6gunner & a childish dishonest punk.

    PUTTING WORDS IN MY MOUTH TOO saying what I don't on spectre/meltdown https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... & I haven't had a MacOS X version recompiled for me yet (I don't own a Mac but I have a friend who does & can code (to a good extent, good enough to load FreePascal 3.0.4 + patches & Lazarus 1.8.2 IDE for it in 64-bit to do so but he is a BUSY guy, just waiting on him for it to do this as a FAVOR to me...))

    APK

    P.S.=> Impossible to deny FACT of your FAKEname (for your FAKE wasted lie of a so-called life) on that 1st post link above you unbelievable loser... apk

  44. If we did this in the US by LostPassword · · Score: 1

    As someone who lives in the Northern US, I would prefer that we stay on DST all the time. I don't mind driving to work in the dark in the winter months, but it's a bummer to drive home, again, in the dark. Staying on DST in the winter would alleviate that to some degree.

    For example daylight on January 1st will be from 08:51 to 17:42. Getting home before dark just doesn't happen for me as I work ~08:30 to ~17:30 but on DST those daylight hours would be from 09:51 to 18:42! That means I can actually use a small amount of daylight after work. Now, compare that to abandoning DST and how it impacts the summer months.

    July 1st this year under DST daylight was from 05:30 to 21:03. That's a long day, but 5:30 AM is also a somewhat reasonable time to be awake in my opinion. Without DST July 1st daylight would have been 04:30 to 20:03. I don't know anyone who would make use of the extra hour in the morning while everyone I know still enjoys that extra hour in the evening.

    Let's keep DST and just never switch back!