Slashdot Mirror


Alibaba's Jack Ma Backs Down From Promise To Trump To Bring 1 Million Jobs to the US (cnbc.com)

Jack Ma, chairman of Alibaba, has abandoned a promise to create one million new jobs in the US, in a sign of the threat that rising trade tensions with China pose to some of US President Donald Trump's key economic goals. From a report: "The promise was made on the premise of friendly US-China partnership and rational trade relations," Ma told Chinese news site Xinhua on Wednesday. "That premise no longer exists today, so our promise cannot be fulfilled." Ma, who recently announced that he will step down as Alibaba chairman within a year, added that the company would "not stop working hard to contribute to the healthy development of China-US trade." Ma's comments come on the heels of a new round of tariffs this week from both China and the U.S. that will affect billions of dollars worth of goods as the two countries have failed to reach a deal to resolve the Trump administration's concerns about China's trade practices.

145 comments

  1. Ooop, my bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My billions are secure though.

  2. He was never able to create 1 million US jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was never able to create 1 million US jobs. Whatever reason he gives for "abandoning the promise" is irrelevant.

  3. Quick survey: by mujadaddy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What was the last high-profile promise you can remember actually being fulfilled?

    --
    Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
    "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    1. Re:Quick survey: by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Well he said we'd have a great relationship with Russia. And while he didn't quite ban all immigration, he sure took a big shit on the legal ones.

    2. Re:Quick survey: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'll show you tough"

      I'll show you tough

    3. Re:Quick survey: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was the last high-profile promise you can remember actually being fulfilled?

      The election was rigged.

    4. Re:Quick survey: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Obamacare. AC to prevent point loss.

    5. Re:Quick survey: by mujadaddy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well he said we'd have a great relationship with Russia

      .............conceded.

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    6. Re: Quick survey: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None from Obama.

    7. Re:Quick survey: by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Anyone that knew Ma's history would have known he was blowing smoke up the skirt of anyone that would listen.

      Ma was a prime example of the dirty business practices of the Chinese conglomerates.

    8. Re:Quick survey: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's some pretty strong accusation that you're making without providing any facts to back it up with. What exactly did Ma do?

    9. Re:Quick survey: by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      In the early days of the internet back when Yahoo was a real company they invested a bunch of Money in a new company in China Called Alibaba (CEO Ma), they bought 50% of the company with this investment. About the time Alibaba became a HUGE company China made a legal change that required that companies like Alibaba be entirely Chinese owned. (I woudln't be surprised if Ma instigated this change himself honestly).

      Ma attempted to transfer the entire company to himself without providing anything to Yahoo in the form of compensation. If there hadn't been a huge public backlash in the US towards Yahoo! he might have succeeded. In the end he provided a little money to Yahoo and walked away with a $50 billion valuation as wholey owned by himself.

      Ma is a perfect example of the new class of Chinese robber barons.

    10. Re:Quick survey: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not familiar with what happened, but some of the details in your story can't be right. From what I've read, Ma didn't own the entire Alibaba after the Alibaba bought back some shares from Yahoo. Altaba was basically the result of the old Yahoo divesting everything other than the Alibaba shares it owned. Today Altaba's market cap is about $40B, most of it is based on the Alibaba shares it owns, I believe.

    11. Re:Quick survey: by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      https://www.quora.com/Did-Chin...

      Got one of the details wrong, it wasn't Alibaba it was the subsidiary Alipay which today is a huge profit generating machine. Ma's attempted to steal the whole division early in it's existence and got caught.

    12. Re:Quick survey: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that Trump kept his side of the deal.

    13. Re: Quick survey: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, which of the dozens of people that have quit or been fired or be investigated are part of draining the swamp

    14. Re: Quick survey: by chill · · Score: 2

      You don't understand. It is so much easier to drain the swamp if you bring your own alligators.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    15. Re:Quick survey: by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Ma is that rich, he's gonna buy slashdot and track you down

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    16. Re:Quick survey: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concede the Supreme court argument, except the appointments go against Americans interests.
      Peace only in name.
      That building was already there, they just changed the plaque.
      The swamp is the deepest it's ever been.

    17. Re:Quick survey: by shaitand · · Score: 0

      Why AC to prevent point loss? The side of the aisle supporting Obamacare and thrashing Trump has the podium simply because they are so militant and control the most popular news media.

      Without the public option Obamacare was not a kept promise, the public option WAS the promise. You can argue we should have public healthcare, you can argue we shouldn't have public healthcare but either way Obamacare is a bastardized hybrid that has skyrocketed healthcare costs and gutted insurance coverage to the point of being useless for those who could afford insurance.

      Maybe more people are technically covered but the number of people who can't afford to actually get care and who are bankrupted by it has increased drastically as well. Unless your objective was simply to get people past the "insurance check" at the doctor's office and not actually get their healthcare costs covered Obamacare is a bastardized flop.

    18. Re:Quick survey: by mujadaddy · · Score: 2

      Neil Gorsuch appointed to supreme court.

      ...Presidents get to nominate SCJ's, so that's not a "promise" unless you're attempting to be clever re: Garland.

      Peace with North Korea.

      Wake me up when the N&S actually sign a peace treaty.

      Moved the US embassy to Jerusalem as promised.

      Again, function of the Executive branch. Do you want credit for keeping the National Parks open, too?

      Draining the swamp, watch the action when the FISA documents get released.

      Oh man, I want you to remember that you said this :)

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    19. Re:Quick survey: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably assumed that someone ELSE was going to pay for the jobs :/

  4. Trump Toad trade practices fail again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He keeps firing from the hip and falling short.

    1. Re:Trump Toad trade practices fail again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He keeps firing from the hip and shooting himself in the foot. But Republican traitors only care that they're running roughshod over the Constitution and the Dems, so full speed ahead.

      FTFY

  5. The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so... by bogaboga · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "That premise no longer exists today, so our promise cannot be fulfilled."

    I have a hunch that the USA no longer has that clout it once had. Countries are now openly willing to defy the USA.

    Some countries are already trying to kill the dollar

    let me hope our president will change course, though I have no doubt that some folks will hope that he doubles down.

  6. Gosh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Align yourself with Big Giant Orange Head and watch everything go off the rails. Who could have seen it coming?

    So much winning.

    1. Re:Gosh! by FFOMelchior · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who could have seen it coming?

      Only 65,853,514 of us, unfortunately.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2016

  7. wow! by fattmatt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wow, the promise of 1 million jobs selling cheap consumer products. Now that's a recipe for a healthy economy.

  8. A joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alibaba and the 40 thieves had a job for them: to steal and to protect the treasures.

    Now, they did lose the job.

  9. Socialism is acceptable in the US during by kingbilly · · Score: 0

    elections.
    I've always found it interesting that the same Americans who aggressively oppose socialism, do not bother questioning how their choice presidential candidate is going to "create jobs". I know it isn't as simple as signing an executive order named "Jobs", but it still feels inorganic for capitalism.

    I'm not a fan of one system or another. Just pointing that out.

    1. Re:Socialism is acceptable in the US during by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take money from Blue States, give it to Red States: Socialism

      Insurance: Socialism

      Fire departments: Socialism

      Social Security and Medicare: Socialism

      National highway system: Socialism

      etc., etc., etc.

      But the bogeyman under your bed is a Socialist, so....

      booga, booga, booga.

    2. Re:Socialism is acceptable in the US during by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol insurance? Insurance might be peak capitalism.

      Insurance is a racket where the state *forces you to buy from the corporations*

      Those corporations, in turn, lobby the state (read: bribe) to keep those laws in effect.
      I suggest removing it from your short list, asap

    3. Re:Socialism is acceptable in the US during by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insurance is sharing risk. Sharing amongst your friends, neighbors, and fellow peers in business.

      Nobody forces you to by life insurance. Or travel/flight insurance.

      Nobody forces shipping companies to insure their cargoes. Government doesn't require homeowners to insure their homes against fires or floods (that's the mortgage lender's requirement.)

      Government forcing you to buy automobile or health insurance is a recent thing. Demanded by the social community (society), so it's especially socialism.

      And if the government wasn't forcing you to have auto insurance, you can bet the bank that loaned you the money to buy the car would require it.

      I suggest you learn what socialism really is before you start offering advice about what is and isn't socialism.

    4. Re: Socialism is acceptable in the US during by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are daft, look at the history of insurance and you will realise the margins are tiny its just the risks are worth so much even an tiny cut is a lot of money. Read up on her history of Lloyds of london.

    5. Re:Socialism is acceptable in the US during by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent is correct. Insurance is about as capitalist as one can get. Socialist insurance would look more like a guaranteed house rebuild in the event of misfortune, paid for by all who pooled their money together, and with no corporation getting rich by denying claims. In fact socialist insurance would likely accept every claim except for obviously fraudulent ones.

    6. Re:Socialism is acceptable in the US during by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not noticing a lot of differences...

  10. Makes no sense by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Making more things here makes *more* sense with the tariffs in place than without, since companies would not be paying tariffs on things built here... so there's something else at work.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Makes no sense by mark-t · · Score: 2

      True, but they'd be paying more to develop domestically because the infrastructure for developing certain kinds of products simply isn't as large in the USA as it is in China, and the inability to produce the same amount of goods due to lack of infrastructure would result in higher prices even if you completely leave labour costs out of the equation.

    2. Re:Makes no sense by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      None of what you said appeared to be a problem (or was any less of a problem) when they made the initial promise.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Makes no sense by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Nowhere in the initial promise was it suggested that they would move jobs from China to the USA, only that they would bring jobs to the USA. The original plan would entail *expanding* capacity, not simply trying to move it to somewhere that can't do the job anywhere nearly as efficiently... even if they did move to the USA, productivity would be so abysmally low on account of lack of infrastructure that prices would go through the roof.

      It's cheaper, no matter how you slice it, to just make Americans pay more for goods that come from China than it is to try and develop that infrastructure domestically without cooperating with China.

      Of course, the even cheaper option would be to not tariff China on goods that America can't really produce as efficiently themselves simply because of a lack of domestic infrastructure.

      If one is going to charge import tariffs to make their own citizens pay more for something from somewhere else, it makes sense to restrict it to things that they can actually meet their own domestic demand for rather than things that their citizenry has perhaps come to depend on coming from elsewhere. But then, this president isn't known for doing things that are overly sensible.

      It's a safe bet that the number of American jobs that these tariffs will actually create, if any, will be entirely overwhelmed by the economic downturn of people simply paying more for those goods.

    4. Re:Makes no sense by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Problem is the supply chain. To build stuff in the US you need a supply of parts from China, because the US doesn't build everything or doesn't build it at the right price.

      But now there are tariffs on those supplies. Not the end of the world for products sold in the US market, although the paperwork is a hidden cost and there is the uncertainty factor about what tariffs might appear in the future. They are a killer for anything exported from the US though, especially with other trade deals under threat with neighbours in the north and south.

      The visa situation is also an issue. if staff can't easily move between China and the US it's a non-tariff barrier.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Makes no sense by Gilgaron · · Score: 2

      Only if tariffs are on finished goods, but there are tariffs on supplies and raw materials which just screws everything up.

    6. Re:Makes no sense by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Making more things here makes *more* sense with the tariffs in place than without

      No it does not because you have forgotten that the tariffs are bi-directional. When the US imposes tariffs on goods the countries affected impose tariffs on US goods. If the rest of the world outside the US continues to remove trade barriers then because the non-US combined economy is far larger than the US one you will end up being far better off making your things outside the US than inside because you can then sell them without tariffs to far more people.

    7. Re:Makes no sense by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      Making more things here makes *more* sense with the tariffs in place than without, since companies would not be paying tariffs on things built here... so there's something else at work.

      Tarrifs are likely to increase the cost of living unless making things locally is very cheap, and if it was, they'd already be made there. Increasing the cost of living may be OK, if wages keep pace, assuming receipts from locally sourced goods are recycled quickly. There are a whole series of feedbacks, and my most was getting very long, so I've cut it down to just the above.

  11. Before Trump by Jarwulf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Slashdot economics experts: China has been bullying other countries economically for decades and unfairly favoring its own companies. We have to do something about it before its too late. The longer we wait the more painful it will be. After Trump ........ Slashdot economics experts: WAAA Trump did something China didn't like and they gave me a booboo. Waaa we must never offend china to keep cheap chinese goods forever!

    1. Re:Before Trump by mujadaddy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you day-drinking?

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    2. Re:Before Trump by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Jarwulf: I have so much confirmation bias that I only see what I want to see about Slashdot and somehow attribute my bias to some pro / anti trump pro / anti China agenda.

    3. Re:Before Trump by TheSunborn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Do something about it yes, but not start a trade war with the entire world at the same time.

      In order to win a trade war with China, USA need allies to help them put presure on China. Instead he said fuck you, to all the countries which would have been natural allies in such a trade war.

    4. Re:Before Trump by barc0001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The US (and the west) has spent decades integrating cheap Chinese goods into its economy. Trying to unwind that all at once is just a bad idea, even if it's necessary.

      Most of the criticism is being leveled at HOW it is being done, not that it needs doing. How it is being done is like you deciding you don't want to rely on China's dinghy that you're sitting in but instead of taking the oars and moving the dinghy to shore in a controlled fashion before getting out of it, you just take a chainsaw and cut it in half when you're 2 miles offshore.

    5. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In order to win a trade war with China, USA need allies to help them put presure on China.

      Why?

      China has been winning their trade war with the US for 40 years. They have fewer allies (which have not been helping them significantly) and resource than the US.

      The only thing the bigger dog needs to do to win the fight is to fight back.

    6. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If other countries don't unite on this anyway, and they help China grow big enough to truly fuck everybody over out of spite for Trump then they are acting so stupidly and maliciously against all our futures it is past all belief. Blame all this spite and ignorance on Trump? No chance. Actions speak far louder than any "fuck you"s real or imagined.

    7. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't know about others but I personally agree steps should be taken against China's unfair trade practices. However, whatever steps taken should be done with actual planning by competent people that understands the complexities. Trump's administration clearly hire the dumbest and most unqualified grifters. They couldn't be bothered to even get competent grifters that understand trade agreement doesn't mean others have to agree to whatever you say. If trump was just screwing with China I don't think people would mind as much. But he also goes around messing with allies like Canada and EU. Oh, they have some tariff on things we don't like? We force a bunch of shit on our trade partners that they don't like either. We just don't hear about it within our walls because we don't care about other people's problems. e.g., Taiwan has resisted American meats because we inject a bunch of hormones that aren't allowed to be used by their farmers, but their government had to allow the import in order to get travel advantages. People that believe US, the biggest economy in the world with the most powerful military thus with the biggest trade leverage, just gets shafted whenever we make trade deals just have persecution complex. Like we're actually not aware of that leverage and always try to play a fair game? Do you actually believe that?

    8. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dafuq

    9. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After my night job.

    10. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show us even one poster who performed this alleged flip-flop.

      Because otherwise you're just saying "Different people on a website had different opinions about a thing, therefore all of them are hypocrites except me!"

    11. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      meanwhile lolbertarians are busy blowing each other and not seeing US consumer buying power going down the shitter

    12. Re:Before Trump by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

      I like your analogy, but to that I say 'sink or swim'. Decades have gone by, meanwhile the government has done nothing of merit to reverse the trend. Will it hurt? Maybe. Unfortunately, the chances are good that the corporate lobby will mitigate this by any means necessary. Ironic since it is mostly their greedy fault.

    13. Re:Before Trump by m00sh · · Score: 2

      Slashdot economics experts: China has been bullying other countries economically for decades and unfairly favoring its own companies. We have to do something about it before its too late. The longer we wait the more painful it will be. After Trump ........ Slashdot economics experts: WAAA Trump did something China didn't like and they gave me a booboo. Waaa we must never offend china to keep cheap chinese goods forever!

      This is cowardice and very un-American.

      We promote freedom, democracy, prosperity and pursuit of happiness.

      We're not goons who think in terms of having to do something about that guy.

      Don't let fear turn you into a coward.

    14. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      feels so good to drift among the remains of the Chinase dinghy

    15. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you classify the administration as incompetent, you will always be blind to what good it does. The GOP did that for eight years. Don't make the same mistake.

    16. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because US already grew big enough to fuck everybody over like Iranians, middle east and even Russia. China bashing is so hypocritical.

    17. Re:Before Trump by quantaman · · Score: 0, Troll

      Slashdot economics experts: China has been bullying other countries economically for decades and unfairly favoring its own companies. We have to do something about it before its too late. The longer we wait the more painful it will be.

      After Trump ........
      Slashdot economics experts: WAAA Trump did something China didn't like and they gave me a booboo. Waaa we must never offend china to keep cheap chinese goods forever!

      China has also been giving other countries cheap good for decades, it wasn't necessarily a bad thing for those countries. It's made the US and other countries very rich in terms of material goods and freed up labour to do more productive things. It's not all great of course, not all of those jobs could be replaced and at some point China starts taking jobs you'd really prefer to keep and exerting influence in ways you don't like.

      But lets accept the premise that you do need to start pushing back against China, it's fairly reasonable. There's a difference between doing X effectively and doing X like a counterproductive moron.

      What's one way to counter China? How about big trade deals with other nations, like the Trans Pacific Partnership... oops... Trump backed out of that.

      What about rallying your allies to excerpt pressure against China, like Obama did to make the Iran deal. Oops again. Trump has made it toxic for US allies to cooperate.

      Maybe you can come to an agreement with China's leaders where there ease up on their more controversial practices? Well there's another oops. Trump style of shaming the other country makes them willing to absorb a lot of pain before they give in on any policy.

      Fine if you want a more confrontational approach with China, you have possibly the most ill-equipped President in your history trying to execute it.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    18. Re:Before Trump by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As a person who prefers to spend a little more to buy solidly built items that last, I don't really see any harm it would have if cheap imported crap was more expensive than it is now.

      Generally people who disfavor the trade scenario with China want less trade, because they do not see any chance of getting China to offer reciprocal rules for foreign businesses. Without that, without China allowing US businesses to operate in China with the freedom that Chinese businesses have to operate in the US, then reducing trade is the whole goal.

      In that sense it is very "winable." Many of the European conflicts have already been resolved.

      What I find funny is that a lot of people think it is only Trump supporters who want decreased trade with China, but I've been hearing the same thing from the left for 30 years about how "Free Trade" will ruin our economy for the little guy, and destroy the environment too. And on the right, the little guy has at least the same economic concerns. Neither party actually votes to support American workers or small business in trade negotiations, so it shouldn't really be that surprising that the little guy supports an anti-trade policy. Meaning, we want Trump to do a bad job dealing with trade with China! LOL

      Not every bad job pushes things in the wrong direction, once in awhile you slip on a banana peel and get saved from getting run over by car! Actually, in other cases he wanted to so something evil, but wasn't allowed by the courts merely because he did a bad job at implementing it. So, maybe even 35% of the screw-ups are useful.

    19. Re:Before Trump by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      I can buy chainsaws made in the USA, chainsaws made in Europe, chainsaws made in Canada, chainsaws made in China.

      China competes on cheap products, but that isn't the same being integrated into the economy in a way that makes them important. The whole reason that the current trade policy is disruptive is because of the time it takes to arrange changes to industrial supply chains, not because China is important to manufacturing.

      Things like automobile production that have a lot of parts will suffer supply hiccups, but OTOH they're not really doing JIT manufacturing, most cars sit around on lots before even being transferred to the dealers, and the disruptions aren't as bad as they might sound on the tee-vee. The vast majority of products do not have that many parts. And none of it is exclusive to China. None of it.

      It is like when you're walking down the sidewalk, and a pebble gets tossed up in the air from traffic and hits chicken little on the head and he wants you to believe that the end of civilization is nigh.

    20. Re:Before Trump by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Not at all. Allies aren't needed. In fact, they just make things more expensive. You know the only reason the USA has allies is due to massive, massive bribes right? America is the fat kid at the playground whose mom has to pay the other kids to play with her.

      If you want access to the gargantuan US market, then play by US rules. China has been exploiting the shit out of us for a long time, ever since those morons in the DC establishment decided to admit them to the WTO. The Chinese have made a mint, the DC establishment created a monster, and the American people paid for it all.

      Nobody wants to cooperate with the Americans unless they get paid. America can win this trade war on its own, because locking other countries out of the US market is basically a death sentence. The world exported its way to prosperity on the backs of the US worker.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    21. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find funny is that a lot of people think it is only Trump supporters who want decreased trade with China, but I've been hearing the same thing from the left for 30 years about how "Free Trade" will ruin our economy for the little guy, and destroy the environment too.

      First off, I'd argue that one of the very few legit uses of tariffs is to encourage countries to come to parity on environmental standards.

      Beyond that, well I'm a democrat, but I like Free Trade. It is the most efficient, in that the market is setting prices and you do not have artificial support for protected businesses. Another way to look at it, is the idea of whether or not someone breaking all the windows regularly is good for the overall town economy. The answer is it isn't. It is just removing from the closed system the potential to do something more useful than replacing windows.

      Another possible thing worth protecting is a military supply chain, since if you get in a war, you need to assure that pipeline. Of course any actions are likely to get reprisals, so, in general, I think i'd stick to the environmental based tariffs and think twice even there. Of course you could just provide tax incentives for the parts in the supply chain, but then that might be a reason another countries slaps on tariffs to level the playing field. A good example is US dairy production. We subsidize the crap out of it, so Canada has a tariff. Trump whines about the tariff calling it horribly unfair, but its just a response to our subsidy.

    22. Re: Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont believe that fairy tale of yours anymore. You cant even make Israel a suitable western country. You are nothing but intimidating muscles who crush creativity everywhere else

    23. Re:Before Trump by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Things like automobile production that have a lot of parts will suffer supply hiccups, but OTOH they're not really doing JIT manufacturing, most cars sit around on lots before even being transferred to the dealers, and the disruptions aren't as bad as they might sound on the tee-vee. The vast majority of products do not have that many parts. And none of it is exclusive to China. None of it.

      Car companies are deciding now what models they will release in 2022. They have to decide now, where to build the plants, where to get the supplies etc. not knowing which countries will have tariffs at what levels on which parts is extremely disruptive and costly.

    24. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect from someone who reads Hitler speeches as his bedtime lecture? Of course he imagines all-out war something that will prove his country's superiority to the world.

    25. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can buy chainsaws made in the USA, chainsaws made in Europe, chainsaws made in Canada, chainsaws made in China.

      I don't think Stihl manufactures in Canada, and Husqvarna ("The Texas Chainsaw Massacre") only in Sweden. And you would not call those other things chainsaws.

    26. Re:Before Trump by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      As a person who prefers to spend a little more to buy solidly built items that last, I don't really see any harm it would have if cheap imported crap was more expensive than it is now.

      Your "solidly built items" are most likely also mostly made in China.

      China produces a lot of crap, but they are absolutely able to produce quality stuff, too. They just don't have the ability to sell quality products (mostly due to the total lack of known brands). And for the lack of a known brand name (which in turn gives a measure of quality - could be low, could be high, at least you have an idea of what quality level you can expect) the only thing they have left to compete on is price, and that in turn means quality suffers as corners are cut to shave off that last tiny bit of a penny.

    27. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem: China is being a protectionist asshat and allowing its industry to externalise costs by causing massive pollution.

      Solution: We should also be protectionist asshats, and allow our own industry to externalise costs by causing massive pollution.

    28. Re:Before Trump by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Right, tariffs don't make friends, they just reduce the trade by increasing overhead.

    29. Re:Before Trump by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You wave your hands about 2022, is that the year of the losses? Or do you have more apples and oranges in your analysis than data?

      If some of the plastic bits change cost, that doesn't matter very much in 2022, it affects everybody so it is not a meaningful disruption. Nobody will be going without a new car because of it.

      Modern manufacturing supply chains are supposed to be more flexible than historical ones, if that isn't true for an industry maybe they're doing it wrong and this experience will improve their practices?

    30. Re:Before Trump by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Sithl is a German company, and the chainsaws they sell in the USA are made in Virginia.

      https://www.stihlusa.com/stihl...

      Most of the Husqvarnas sold in the US are made in the US, but the more expensive ones are made in Sweden.

      I personally prefer Stihl if I have to use a saw, but I can't imagine a Ryobi, Tanaka, or Hitachi not being a reasonable tool.

    31. Re:Before Trump by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1
      Maybe you should have just read the link and listened to the people who actually know.

      The escalating trade spat between the United States and China has impacted the autos sector with car-makers finding it increasingly tough to plan longer-term projects, a Daimler board member told CNBC on Wednesday.

      "The steel and aluminium prices skyrocketed in the United States, making our tax more expensive there," Martin Daum said, adding that the big concern is planning future projects.

      "These days, we talk about the products we are going to launch in 2022, 2023. We talk to our suppliers who have to invest heavily and they need stability to make those investment decisions."

      You wave you hands around talking about plastic bits. Who should we listen to...

    32. Re:Before Trump by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Are you drunk?

    33. Re:Before Trump by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It is somewhat telling that that is your first response to something you don't understand. I guess you spend a lot of times hanging out in bars?

    34. Re:Before Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost as telling that you have commented 3 times now, even though you still don't seem to understand the situation.

  12. math problem by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0
    Since Trump and his merry band of spineless cowards have taken our economy to new heights, and we have acheived essentially full employment, adding 1 million jobs is not only not necessary, but counterproductive for the people Trump works for.

    A real math problem here

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  13. Promises - help the people by unique_parrot · · Score: 1

    There was a documentation about usa in european tv, which I watched. Terrible news about infrastructure but the news about crystal meth and drug abuse was VERY worrying. A generation could break away about and their childs/children are not on a happy way. Somebody from another country promises jobs??? Trump does that aswell, it`s worriying.

    1. Re:Promises - help the people by unique_parrot · · Score: 1

      sorry about grammar and mistakes

    2. Re:Promises - help the people by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      but the news about crystal meth and drug abuse was VERY worrying

      Crystal meth is no longer trendy among teenagers/20-year-olds. It's an old person drug. Heroin is the new choice.

      Good lord, I wish I was joking.

      I should point out this is based on statistics of people arrested, not personal experience

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:Promises - help the people by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      That's depressing. Is there a way to invent and provide soma that doesn't lead to a Brave New World dystopia? Or is this just our culture euthanizing the elements that have become redundant with increased automation?

    4. Re:Promises - help the people by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      It's more likely our culture having doctors (until recently?) proscribing tons of opiods, then people getting addicted, then the legal supply getting cut off. Then they turn to heroin because at least then they can get it.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:Promises - help the people by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Yeah I guess that's why I made the reference to soma, it seems like we either need to just let these people indulge themselves without the legal hurdles or provide better addiction treatment.

    6. Re:Promises - help the people by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I guess my point was that there aren't "these people" in this case. Overprescription crosses race/wealth/education lines.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  14. Sounds like retaliation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like a retaliation against Trump's recent announcement of new tariffs on Chinese products.

    "You hit us, we hit back twice as hard."

    1. Re:Sounds like retaliation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like you have no idea what you're talking about.

  15. So what? Nobody wants a chink search engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Keep your mongoloid jobs. The sooner all these 'gig economy' shitheads die the better.
    We need more automation, less minorities. Companies should be taxed on what they provide to humanity:

    - Search engine: provides worthless trash, distraction and employs ugly trannies and faggots
        Tax level: 2000%

    - Farmer: provides food
        Tax level: 0%

    1. Re:So what? Nobody wants a chink search engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh, spot the butt hurt incel fatass!

  16. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the president has been the one at the wheel for the entire losing of US clout. He says it's the best wheeling anyone has ever done while going down the best course in the history of course making.

    I somehow doubt that changing course is on the helmsman's mind.

  17. Kind of the other way by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I have a hunch that the USA no longer has that clout it once had.

    Do you guess completely backwards very often?

    Countries are now openly willing to defy the USA.

    Since when have they not? The difference now is that the U.S. actually pushes back.

    The U.S. is having vastly more effect now and responses from other countries, than it ever did under Obama.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  18. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Freischutz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "That premise no longer exists today, so our promise cannot be fulfilled."

    I have a hunch that the USA no longer has that clout it once had. Countries are now openly willing to defy the USA.

    Some countries are already trying to kill the dollar

    let me hope our president will change course, though I have no doubt that some folks will hope that he doubles down.

    The US had plenty of clout, backed by a network of friends and allies that was unique in human history, and potentially still is mostly salvageable. That network of allies has always been the USA's strength because everybody knew that whatever the Americans got up to they'd always be better of with those occasionally crazy Yanks than the Soviets/Russians or the Chinese. The US' position would still be unassailable if Trump wasn't busy throwing away that clout and methodically disassembling the network of friends and allies. There is a whole slew of Asian countries now cozying up to China but not necessarily because they want to. With the Trump administration adopting a policy of insulting everybody and isolating the US, they have no choice but to cozy up to China. Most of them would much prefer the US, it usually offer a better deal and, (key point here) the USA is a distant hegemon, far across the ocean. You can't drive American tanks to Asia from the continental US and amphibious operations are very expensive and hard to do right. You can, however, easily drive Chinese tanks from bases in China to most of these Asian countries and they are only too keenly aware of it. Most of them have watched China claim the south China sea to the extent that you can stand on a beach at the water's edge in some of the countries in the region and send a golden arc of piss into what China regards as its sacred territorial waters.

  19. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The really sad thing is that you did this to yourselves and you have been doing it for at least the last 15-20 years.

    You've been running the US in the same as you've been running your corporations - only thinking about the next quarter and doing very little investment for the longer term.

    Unfortunately, what is happening to the US now is also what happens to corporations run in this way - you rot from within while running on inertia for a time (which maintains the illusion that everything is running ok - at least for a short time).

    Unfortunately there reaches a point with those corporations when you run out of inertia and everything collapses and this is exactly what is happening to the US.

    I feel sorry for you because when enough of you finally realise this it is very likely to be too late.

  20. I see what he did there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He never had any chance of fulfilling that promise, so why not make a cheap jab at Trump.

    ( Wal-Mart employs around 1.4-1.5 million. )

    1. Re:I see what he did there by Mark+of+the+North · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised he didn't wait until late October to make that jab. The timing could make for a knock-out on November 6th.

  21. Re:What would we do with 1M more jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yeah, the know-it-alls are really the problem, eh?

    You settled for a GED thinking you could work down at the steel mill for 30 years like your dad did.

    But it's easier to blame other people than fess up to your own short sightedness.

    And ordinary people didn't elect Trump, he lost the popular vote. I suspect you actually knew that despite your act to sort of reverse virtual signal, trying to play the ordinary working stiff.

    You lot are real big on the Personal Responsibility thing, as long as it's not you personally who's having his feet held to the fire over why he is where he is today.

    The smug know-it-all cunt is the guy you see in the mirror every morning when you brush your teeth. Except he really doesn't know it all.

  22. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, this is happening, because corporation run the US.

  23. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have very rosy colored glasses.

  24. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    For hundreds of year the Gold Standard (and by default the British Pound) were the standard for international Trade, simply because the Pound was backed by the gold reserves.

    There was no US dollar from the Federal Reserve until 1913.

    During WWII, the USA demanded payment from the UK etc in Gold, so by default the US ended up with the majority of Gold Reserves. It was in the 1950's when world trade was again taking off that the US$ became the standard (because of the gold they had). At this stage the USA also accounted for over 60% of the entire worlds GDP.

    Today the USA accounts for about 19% of the worlds GDP (and falling), not because the USA failed, but because the rest of the world succeeded , it had rebuilt from WWII (something the US did not have to do). The USA is only 4% of the worlds population, so all other things being equal the USA could fall to 4% of the worlds GDP.

    The rest of the world is starting to see the USA as a bully and wants the world to shift away from the USA and it politics dominating their countries and economies.
    The Euro is a good example of this, though more needs to be done to equalise and stabilise the individual countries within the federation.
    It is likely that China (if not already) will become the worlds biggest economy shortly, Trump is only accelerating this as other countries also believe the need to reduce dependance on the USA and are actively seeking trade agreements with each other, and in particular the Asian economies (which account for over 60% of the worlds population).

    Trump said "Trade wards are easy to win", this also means "Trade wars are easy to loose" , Trump lacks any real understanding of world economics, international trade, all indications are people who have to deal with him believe he is an idiot. He is souring international relationships on an almost daily basis. This means he is far more likely to loose the war than win it. Shouting " USA USA USA" will not change this, and the cracks and failures in Welfare, Education, Health, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press, democracy, , etc etc are growing wider in the USA (go search for USA world rankings on these measures).

    The USA leads the worlds spending on the military , and seems to frequently use it, not so much to protect US citizens but to protect US corporate interests (Oil, etc). Perception is everything, and the worlds perception of the USA is falling .

  25. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Freischutz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You have very rosy colored glasses.

    Very rosy colored glasses. what you need to see Trump as a stable genius, friend of the common man, master negotiator, keen political mind and greatest American of all time. I think I made it quite clear that I consider him a bumbling idiot, and that's me putting it kindly.

  26. It's already too late by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    the manufacturing jobs aren't coming back. Even if the factories do they'll have so much automation they're never going to employ the kinds of numbers they used to. There's multiple studies showing this. We've doubled our manufacturing output in the last 40 years while cutting our workforce by 1/3 ( source).

    Thing is this is why Hilary didn't think it was much of an issue in the campaign. She's trapped in an iron bubble and she thought people would be reasonable about manufacturing jobs and just accept they're not coming back. Of course, if she wasn't such an arrogant **** (substitute your own curse word kiddies) she'd have offered up a solution to the jobs problem besides "Hey, I went to a posh college and graduated with honors, so can everybody else". Trump for his part saw millions of ex factory workers being ignored (well, Paul Manafort did, he's the one that told Trump to campaign in the rust belt on jobs).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  27. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a bumbling idiot, and that's me "

  28. Re:What would we do with 1M more jobs by Highdude702 · · Score: 0

    High,
    "the ordinary working stiff." here.
    People like you and the previous AC if not you, are the reason trump got elected.
    Also, I have not only gotten a larger yearly salary at the company I work for, I now get bonus's and have a retirement plan that my company pays into for me.
    I cant say hes done such a shit job so far.

  29. One country, how many systems? by magarity · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Yet another nail in Hong Kong's independence coffin.

    1. Re:One country, how many systems? by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Hong Kong isn't independent now, wtf are you even talking about?

      They got 10 years of no new rules to arrange an orderly handover, any promises beyond that were already broken and the policies retracted long ago.

      You should seek access to news sources.

  30. Fuck Him by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

    Some pissant CEO from a foreign country doesn't get to break a deal with the US, ban his company from doing business in the US until he makes good.

  31. Trump was a known idiot all along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world's governments had Trump figured out by the time he took the office. He's an idiot. Luckily for the US, or unluckily if you're an Alex Jones QAnon deepstate CHEMTRAILSANDALIENS!!!! type, we're a Republic and a bunch of nested governments with separation of powers etc. I'll bet there was a real worry among the DC imperial insiders of both parties that Trump was going to weld the Executive Branch as a wing of Breitbart and go efficiently white nationalist. But then he got into a fight about the size of the crowds and they all thought "This guy really is an idiot" and went about doing their thing knowing that Trump's staff would keep him in fresh diapers.

    If there really was a danger of a realer trade war we'd see the Chinese and the EU banks starting to divest Treasuries and parking the money in probably German and Japanese banks. We're not seeing that, just more diaper flinging.

  32. Double sanctions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider US products, with parts made in China exported to EU. Every sold has TWO SETS of sanctions on it: the sanctions Trump puts on Chinese goods, the retaliation sanctions EU puts on US goods.

    Or the US company could simply move it all to China (or Mexico), and it would have NONE of those sanctions.

    Republicans are busy inflating the economy with tax cuts and more borrowing, and that really needs MORE exports to prop it up, not less. He's not even coordinating with the GOP, let alone coordinating between his various sanctions regimes.

  33. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Things have changed quite a bit. Countries followed the US because #1, they were the most powerful and had the most amount of money, and #2 because they had somewhat some moral standing as a leader. #1 is slowly being chipped away, and #2 has been thrown out of the window, as the US escapades in the Middle East and elsewhere has caused nothing but trouble for the European nations, who have to contend now with huge amount of migrants from destabilized Africa and Middle East.

    Now the US pretty much just rules by fear and threats. The worst type of hegemon.

    BTW. I don't think those oceans stopped US tanks pretty much anywhere, considering that US has the strongest navy in the world, and military bases almost everywhere.

  34. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

    It will be an excellent day when America gets kicked off the world stage. At last, we will be able to ignore the haters and start concentrating on ourselves again. Our people are hurting, badly. Our soldiers are sent off to die on insane missions aiding countries who hate us. Our wealth is exported and our workers abandoned. We commit war crimes on a regular basis.

    Remember that time Obama bombed the Doctors Without Borders hospital? It was the only time in history one Nobel Peace Prize winner bombed another Nobel Peace Prize winner. He then gunned down the fleeing doctors and patients. This is a war crime under the Nuremberg principles that got all those Nazis hanged. And America just declared defiance of the International Criminal Court, where Obama needs to be standing to answer for his crimes.

    America has set the world back hundreds of years socially and technologically. America is the greatest threat to the planet. The day that America falls will be declared a global holiday.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  35. Re:What would we do with 1M more jobs by psycho12345 · · Score: 2

    And when the recession comes, and you get laid off, what then? Tariffs just lead to layoffs inevitably. The only thing propping up this entire shitshow is the tax cuts and stock buybacks. Couple more interest rate raises and things are going to start crumbling (like nearly every recession for the last century).

  36. Yes, and stop using up all our carbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, and stop using up all our CO2 quota.

  37. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    China's been trying to kill the dollar for almost a decade now. It hasn't been working, because no matter how strained US/EU or US/OPEC relations get, everyone knows the US doesn't use the dollar's bully power and China would if the yuan replaced it.

    And Russia... isn't a big economic player.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  38. Foolish Trumpeters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know China is bigger right...

  39. You are clueless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our wealth is exported

    You have a massive trade deficit and are also trillions of dollars in debt to foreign countries...
    You are suckling on the teat of other peoples hard work, and now you are complaining about it too?

  40. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is likely that China (if not already) will become the worlds biggest economy shortly, Trump is only accelerating this as other countries also believe the need to reduce dependance on the USA and are actively seeking trade agreements with each other, and in particular the Asian economies (which account for over 60% of the worlds population).

    The one thing that crosses many people's mind is "Why is Trump doing the thing he is doing?", especially regarding China.

    Say all you want about Trump - the one thing about Trump is he ain't dumb.

    He is going *FULL BLAST* at China (short of a nuclear exchange) right now because Trump knows this is the very last chance US has to bluff its ways against its nemesis.

    Ronald Reagan was the last POTUS who deployed the bluffing game and successfully defeated its nemesis at the time, the Soviet Union - it was the 'Star War' ploy that forced the SU to empty its national coffer trying to play a catch-up game with USA on star-war gadgets (which Ronald Reagan knew even USA wasn't able to get it working).

    Trump's all out trade war against China is his last ditch effort to stop China from becoming the next world superpower - or at least, slows China's progress to a crawl.

    Trump knows all too well that if he does not do it in 2018, he and USA ain't gonna have a second go for it.

    Trump may not be re-elected in 2020, and even if he is, by the 2020's China will have more power (technological, as well as financial) to play with.

    Even if China couldn't achieve get its "Made in China 2025" in full bloom by 2025, it would have much more power, by then, then China is having today.

    2030 is only 12 years off, and by the 2030's, China would have surpassed USA on some technological fronts, and Japan by then, would no longer have the guts to pick fight against China no more.

    By the 2040's America would see its own influence dwarfed by that of China, and all the so-called 'allies' would have abandoned us.

    By 2050's UK would become a third world country, and the Germans would be speaking Arabic, and Australia would have been taken over by Indonesia.

    Without UK, Japan and Germany the United States can no longer do what it is doing now.

    In other words, if Trump doesn't do what he is doing now, against China, USA will have forever lost its chance, to defeat China.

  41. Jack The Horse's Ma Pi! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, Jack The Horse Ma, who's going to believe your offer of one million jobs in the first place? Your Ma pi! Rational trade is defined as: the US buys ¥6.85 renminbi of goods from the Chinese Peoples Republic, the Chinese Peoples Republic buys one Yankee dollar's worth of goods from the US. That hasn't happened in 40 years at a "rational" exchange rate.

  42. Re:What would we do with 1M more jobs by Highdude702 · · Score: 0

    I'm non union, I don't worry about layoffs. I think its happened once in my entire career.

  43. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A great example of this is what happened with TPP. When the US pulled out the other countries decided to continue on their own with CPTPP, basically the same thing but without the US. They dropped all the stuff that the US wanted by they didn't of course.

    So now they have this huge trade deal with 11 countries and the US is trying to do individual deals with each of them. Of course they don't want to do individual deals, the whole point of doing a collective one was that no single country could make demands without broader agreement. And of course, that's why Trump didn't like it, he thought he could do better individual deals and force countries to agree to them.

    What has actually happened is that the CPTPP signatories are just stalling with the US, waiting for Trump to go away. Japan doesn't want to lower automotive standards to allow more US cars to be sold there, and doesn't want to lower food standards to allow US meat products to be sold (like the EU they don't allow chlorine washing for example).

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  44. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > US had plenty of clout, backedup by a network of friends and allies....

    The above is just a wrong. US in the last 30 years or so, completely lost being the 'Moral compass of democracy' , if such is even existed.

    Instead, it created a network of 'pay-to-play' political mafia with prominent crime families running the 'Charities and foundations', as front-end to money laundering schemes.

    US actively engaged in meddling in other countries elections (eg Israel's), destroyed regimes in the middle east that gave way to Isis, and supported actively Iran in its bids to continue destabilizing the region.

    I think US especially in the last 8-10 years, created a complete distrust for its media, its human rights stands, and it s overall 'cleanliness' in the eyes of the rest of the world.

    I do not think any half-decently informed person in the middle east, far east, or eastern Europe -- thought of US (or UK) -- as anything better than their own corrupt and unfair political establishment.

  45. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hurr durr. no wonder you worship at the feet of donald jesus trump

  46. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now they have this huge trade deal with 11 countries and the US is trying to do individual deals with each of them.

    the morons who are governing america aren't even doing that, they've are so incompetent that they haven't even gotten around to negotiating with most of those countries.

  47. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is soon going to eclipse USA , first economically, then militarily (one follows the other).

    Already USA is behind China in terms of GDP: $18.5T for USA vs $23.1T for China.

    If Trump wants to kill trade between USA and China, then there's a whole up-and-coming middle/consumer-class in Asia that is ready to take up the slack. India alone has become an $10T+ economy.

  48. ET4S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, whatever steps taken should be done with actual planning by competent people that understands the complexities. Trump's administration clearly hire the dumbest and most unqualified grifters.

    That applies to every single issue that trump has glommed on to. His schtick is to say "You hate foo? I hate foo too!! You should support me!" But foo is always secondary to his grifting. At best he neglects foo because it doesn't make him richer, but when foo becomes an obstacle to him, he abandons it.

    Consequently everybody who thought they would get their issues addressed is actually getting fucked. If you cared about NSA spying on innocent people, the end result of trump's war on spies is going to be increased support for spies as the fact that they actually caught him and his crew conspiring with foreign countries. If you were a steel worker, you won't get jackshit because the steele corps are keeping all the profits for themselves. If you wanted better healthcare, all you are getting is more sabotage. If you were a democrat who didn't like how Comey treated Clinton, he tried to co-opt you into supporting his firing of Comey. If you wanted more racism, trump's going to fire his most effective racist because sessions won't do enough to protect trump from a criminal investigation.

    ET4S: Everything Trump Touches Turns To Shit.

  49. Convenient Out by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 1

    Mr. Ma has found a convenient way out of his promise he knew he'd never be able to keep. If it wasn't an excuse on trade relations, it would be the sky is too blue or the sun is orbiting in too predictable of an orbit.

    1. Re:Convenient Out by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 1

      Hmm, probably should have said the Moon, since obviously, the Earth orbits the Sun, not the other way around. Thanks Galileo!

  50. how did third-party sellers become "jobs"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ma was going to open up alibaba to third-party american sellers - how are these "jobs"? like these people can't sell on amazon, wal-mart, newegg, buy.com, ebay, and all the other race-to-the-bottom third-party seller sites

  51. A Chinese lied? Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Chinese lied? Shocking.

  52. Re: Ooop, my bad 420 funding secured ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His announcements will not help grow business in USA.

    Very negative, however in related news INDIA has said it is happy to work with the USA and transfer jobs and products from China to India.

  53. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Friendship involves two parties, yet so many people automatically blame the US. People act like the US got out of bed one day and was like "you know, I think today I'll start being a jerk for no reason". That's tabloid-level crap. Would you want to be friends with people like that?

    Like when the US told NATO to stop being a bunch of moochers and start spending the money they agreed to spend. The response? "Oh how dare you tell us to spend the money we said we'd spend!" I mean... world, are you listening to yourself?

    The US' #1 strength is its populace. They produce a shit ton of wealth, and are - by world standards - very creative and innovative. The US would be fine alone, but they never will be... not as long as they're producing "the good shit".

    The world's talking shit, and Trump's talking back. Of course people dont like it. Too bad, and kiss my black ass.

  54. Re:What would we do with 1M more jobs by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    I love when slashdork mods down the real niggas.

  55. Inexpensive and High quality products by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Common man buys/appreciates Inexpensive and High quality products;
    Countries should amend their Constitutions accordingly;
    https://archive.st/archive/201...

  56. Re:The USA [slowly] losing its clout? I think so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have also previously said that the Texas National Guard could beat the entirety of the rest of NATO, which would mean that one member of the TNG could take on an entire regiment of, say, the French army. You're not very credible.

  57. Re:Irrelevant, we don't need him by slashdotwannabe · · Score: 1

    Says the person who obviously has no idea how tariffs work.

    --
    This comment is my opinion and does not represent an official position of Donald Trump or others I do not work for