Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Model 3 Earns Five-Star Crash Safety Rating From NHTSA (jalopnik.com)

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has awarded the Tesla Model 3 with a five-star safety rating -- the highest possible score. This means that every car Tesla has built has earned a five-star rating. Jalopnik reports: The NHTSA tests cover three primary categories: Frontal Crash, Side Crash, and Rollover, and the Model 3 received the highest ratings in all categories. For some categories, it's easy to understand why Teslas do so well. Rollover resistance, for example, makes sense for cars that carry most of their weight at the very bottom, in the batteries sandwiched in the Tesla's chassis design. Other reasons for the remarkable crash safety may be that, without the need for a heavy chunk of metal as a drivetrain, effective and large crumple zones can be designed in, front and rear. The NHTSA has released videos of their frontal collision test, side pole collision test, and side collision test, for those who like watching these sort of things.

28 of 214 comments (clear)

  1. Any people wonder why the model 3 is hot by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In other stories, people have scoffed at the notion model 3 cars could possibly be more popular than luxury electric models coming out.

    Yet here we have another reason beyond just top acceleration numbers why people may want to get a Tesla rather than something else...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re: Any people wonder why the model 3 is hot by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I own an Austin Martin, an MG, two audis, a Benz and a classic landrover, not counting the motorcycles.

      You can't even figure out how to make a Slashdot account, and we're supposed to believe you had the wherewithal to accumulate all those vehicles?

      I'm guessing you're talking about toy model cars, unlike the totally real Koenigsegg and Bugatti Chiron sitting out in my driveway right now. One is for me and the other is for my wife, Morgan Fairchild, which whom I have had sex.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Any people wonder why the model 3 is hot by Solandri · · Score: 3, Informative

      You do realize that nearly all popular car models get a 5-star crash test rating? It's just that for some reason, a car getting a 5-star safety rating becomes a front-page news story only when it's a Tesla.

      (This is not to denigrate Tesla's safety engineering. The lead safety engineer at BMW gave a guest lecture at my graduate structural engineering class. To our surprise, safety is dead last in the design process. First the artist designs the basic shape of the car. Then all the engineers design the mechanical and electrical components to fit within the artist-defined shape. Finally the safety engineer is given a budget of (say) 25 kg of steel, and told to add reinforcement to make the car pass the government and insurance institute safety tests. So all it would take to design a safer car is to move the safety engineer earlier in the design process, which I believe Tesla has done.)

    3. Re:Any people wonder why the model 3 is hot by idji · · Score: 2

      I think you are confusing capital expenditure with operating expenses.

    4. Re: Any people wonder why the model 3 is hot by Rei · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is hot because the batteries burn at high temperature for some.

      Model 3s have been driven (calculations in a previous Slashdot article) about 300-400 million miles so far. In the US, there's a car fire once in every ~20 million miles. So far the shorts (who've been desperate to find any Model 3 fires they can find) have found evidence of one - count it, one - fire in a Model 3. And that was in a Model 3 at the factory (salvage yard: Fremont; miles on the odometer: 1), not an owner vehicle. And when you look at the damage, it's heaviest on the front bumper, least around the battery.

      Meanwhile, new BMWs in South Korea have been catching fire at a rate of half a dozen vehicles per month. Not cars in accidents - most of them have been in parked cars. But of course, we don't report on things like that because, hey, they're not Tesla. Tesla is one of the few automakers which has not had to have fire-related recalls in the past several years. A number of major automakers have had to in the past several months. Gee, who would have ever thought that a combustion vehicle, propelled by combusting a highly flammable fuel, might sometimes have issues with unintended combustion?

      --
      "Who the hell is Nietzche? It's a question stupid people are asking." -- Newscaster, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
    5. Re: Any people wonder why the model 3 is hot by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

      In all categories and all subcategories as well? No, that is not normal, even for luxury cars. Seriously, just compare the pole tests for starters.

      --
      "Who the hell is Nietzche? It's a question stupid people are asking." -- Newscaster, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
    6. Re: Any people wonder why the model 3 is hot by Rei · · Score: 2
      --
      "Who the hell is Nietzche? It's a question stupid people are asking." -- Newscaster, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
    7. Re: Any people wonder why the model 3 is hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      The crash tests results of your motorcycle should be very interesting...

    8. Re: Any people wonder why the model 3 is hot by jeremyp · · Score: 2

      I think, anybody that owned an Aston Martin would know how to spell it.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    9. Re:Any people wonder why the model 3 is hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Overall five stars yes, but not all 5 stars.
      There are [only] two other cars that get rated as high: The Toyota Camry and Subaru Forester
      https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidkiley5/2018/09/20/can-tesla-model-3s-five-star-nhtsa-rating-change-elon-musks-bad-month/#42426833103b

    10. Re:Any people wonder why the model 3 is hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How does a comment like this get a "4, Informative" rating? The reason that it's news is that it has received a 5-star safety rating in EVERY CATEGORY rather than just an overall 5-star category (which is generally achieved with ratings lower than 5-stars in several categories). I mean.. If you're going to complain about it being news all over, it would be a good idea to read one sample rather than just the Slashdot summary (which of course also misses the point, but that's to be expected).

    11. Re:Any people wonder why the model 3 is hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Funny story I looked it up,

      Since you used BMW as an example I checked of the 522 BMWs that NHTSA has data for on their website only 18 received 5 stars in frontal crash ratings....and all of those 18 vehicles only got 4 stars on their rollover ratings, i believe they were all SUVs.

      so no, apparently it's not all that easy to get 5 stars in frontal, side, and rollover crash ratings

  2. Time for a breath of fresh air by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now can we finally see the end of the morons claiming that Tesla doesn't know how to build cars, because it's harrrrrrrd? Sure, it's a hard job. That's why Tesla hired people who know how to do it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re: Time for a breath of fresh air by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The lies are getting rather desperate considering that the only two automotive majors that haven't gone bankrupt are Ford and Tesla. All others have.

      You have to at least try to make it look like you're not just lying through your teeth you know.

    2. Re: Time for a breath of fresh air by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tesla still doesn't know how to build cars. As in, in volume

      Can you build 8000 cars a month? Because Tesla is almost there.

      You see, once they figured out how to actually produce in volume, from there it's very easy to scale up (as long as you are not constrained by suppliers).

      Building them for sale without going broke is what is hard, and what Tesla cannot do.

      That sounds scary! Lucky for Tesla what you are saying is a bald-faced lie. But then you are an AC so I'm sure no-one believed what you were saying anyway.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re: Time for a breath of fresh air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is just a flesh wound, and will be fixed by an OTA.

    4. Re: Time for a breath of fresh air by McWilde · · Score: 2

      4000 a week is rather a lot more than 8000 a month.

      --
      Maybe
    5. Re: Time for a breath of fresh air by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      I would suggest he meant American majors. There are plenty of foreign automajors that are running just fine.

  3. Correct links? by Sebby · · Score: 2

    The second and third links, while different, seem to be the exact same video?

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    1. Re:Correct links? by Sebby · · Score: 2

      Of course, I should have RTFA first since it has all three different videos already.

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  4. Tesla has a ~20% profit margin by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hey, when you sell cars below cost

    Well we all know AC's lie, but by how much?

    Here's a good example of a real-life measurement you can use to determine how much fabrication goes into the average AC statement, because Tesla has around a 20% profit margin per car - 5x higher than Ford. Kind of a lot different than "losing money on every car".

    Hey, who you gonna believe, a smooth-talking AC where *certainly* has nothing against Tesla, or your lying Ars?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Tesla has a ~20% profit margin by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      but include the REQUIRED SG&A expenses

      Totally. When Tesla runs a welding robot faster, that totally makes them build and fill a new office building!

      SG&A is not part of gross margin for a reason: it does not rise in correlation with production volumes as a production line spools up. Increasing production rates on a line lowersCOGS, by decreasing hardware depreciation. Without refining of proction processes, labour costs increases linearly with volumes (labour being only a fraction of COGS), but refining production processes - something that happens every month as a new line matures - decreases labour. SG&A, by contrast, scales at a far-below-linear relationship to production volumes. Stamping out panels faster doesn't mean that you need to hire a new janitor. Simplifying how to attach two components with less labour doesn't mean you have to hire a new webmaster. Reducing interruptions in the paint shop doesn't mean you have to hire a new director of accounting. Heck, should we even bother talking about the SG&A expense that is operating the supercharger network - formerly a (expensive) loss leader, but presently converting to a profit centre as Model 3 volumes expand, and for which the vast majority ofchargers (aka those in less densely populated areas) are able to vastly increase their service volumes without any capital expenses?

      I also love the fact that you never mention the fact that Tesla took a SG&A hit in Q2 in order to reduce its SG&A expenses from Q3 onward, but let's not worry our little heads about that!

      --
      "Who the hell is Nietzche? It's a question stupid people are asking." -- Newscaster, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
    2. Re:Tesla has a ~20% profit margin by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      A lot of those expenses are things like improving the service centres to cope with the demand. There were already ridiculous delays getting parts and basic repairs done, six months not being unusual for things like accident damage. Just staying still required a huge investment and this week they announced even more to try to make the system reasonably responsive.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Tesla has a ~20% profit margin by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

      lot of those expenses are things like improving the service centres to cope with the demand

      That's not SG&A, that's "Services and Other". Services and Other cost Tesla a net $116M in Q2, vs. revenue of $4B, aka eating up less than 3% of their gross margin.

      There were already ridiculous delays getting parts and basic repairs done, six months not being unusual for things like accident damage.

      6 months is highly unusual. Of course, you can always find some body shop somewhere for any brand that has hundreds of thousands of vehicles on the road that takes an inordinate amount of time. That doesn't make that "normal". Want to make there be zero cases of abnormal crash repair times (for shorts to find out about and share widely every chance they get) when you don't control the body shops? Good luck with that.

      S & X repairs from accidents are usually several weeks to a month. But these are much lower volume vehicles than the 3. In the Model 3 Owners Survey, the average repair took under a week. Speaking of Model 3 repairs...

      --
      "Who the hell is Nietzche? It's a question stupid people are asking." -- Newscaster, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
    4. Re:Tesla has a ~20% profit margin by Rei · · Score: 2

      BS, and you know it. I've called you out on this MANY times Rei. SG&A has been scaling LINEARLY for Tesla for 5 years.

      And you know I've called you many times on this. The fact that you refuse to read what I wrote doesn't change any of this. You keep trying to conflate the costs of scaling up for the construction and operation of a brand new model line with per-unit costs, which is an absurdity, contradicting all tenets of manufacturing. And I'll repeat: "I'm looking forward to hearing where Tesla has been secretly recruiting for all the jobs they haven't been posting on their website and where they've been storing these tens of thousands of people and new lines, given that no new line has been built at Fremont since Q2. That's going to be really exciting to find out, no? I'm voting for an underground volcano lair! ;)" Seriously, where exactly do you think this mythical spending is going? It's not hiring. It's not construction. So where, exactly? Why exactly is it that you never want to answer that question? Just to give specific examples:

      Can you sell product without paying for showrooms, sales people, delivery fees, purchasing departments, supply chain administration?

      Where's the linear increase in showrooms? Hint: there hasn't been one.
      Where's the linear increase in sales people? Hint: there hasn't been one. Just the opposite, they killed off their solar direct sales.
      Where's the linear increase in delivery fees? I guarantee you you'll find that the per-unit delivery costs (at least eventually when it's running smoothly) end up lower because they're being done in larger volume. Higher volume shipping is cheaper per unit.
      Where's the linear increase in purchasing departments and supply chain administration? Just ignoring that it's absurd to think that it's required - as if the same person can't tack another zero on the end of an order - where's the hiring? Where's the extra office buildings? Nowhere, that's where.

      You're calling for the doubling of Tesla's personel. Where are they?

      we're about a week out from finding out just how much they lost

      Seriously, how ignorant are you that you don't know that quarterly filings don't come out until a month after the quarter ends?

      --
      "Who the hell is Nietzche? It's a question stupid people are asking." -- Newscaster, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
  5. Bad cost accounting by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Hey, when you sell cars below cost (essentially giving them away), you can move a lot of cars! Now, add in the $17,600 that Tesla loses on each vehicle ($717 million loss last quarter to ship 40,740 cars) and the $7500 the Government gives you to buy one, and you end up with the mythical $35K and up car actually costing $60K.

    You are clearly not an accountant and you obviously don't work in manufacturing because you have the accounting analysis completely wrong. Where to begin...

    TLDR version is that Tesla isn't going to have to raise prices - the just have to keep their variable costs low and sell a lot of cars and they should reach profitability. Presuming their debt load doesn't kill them before that happens of course.

    1) You are assuming Tesla's costs are constant and fixed which is never true in manufacturing. This is not unique to Telsa.
    2) Tesla has spend a huge amount of money building up a supply chain and assembly line and distribution/service network. This money gets recouped as they build and sell vehicles. This is a fixed up front cost which does not change not matter how many vehicles they sell. They have to achieve a certain volume of sales to be profitable which takes time. Every other car manufacturer experiences the exact same thing.
    3) You failed to distinguish between fixed and variable costs and are allocating all the fixed costs to the first few vehicles produced. Literally almost every product manufactured by any company would seem to lose money if you allocated all the fixed costs over the first few units sold and then (wrongly) held that cost constant. That's not how it actually works. The more units Tesla sells the more units they can spread the fixed costs across. This is why buying large quantities of something gets you a better price than buying small quantities.
    4) The tax credit has zero direct bearing on Tesla's profitability or lack thereof. It's an incentive to buy external to Tesla but doesn't add or subtract a dime to Telsa directly. Other than maybe getting some marginal sales the wouldn't have otherwise it doesn't add or subtract costs to Tesla.
    5) That 40K vehicles sold number you quote is for ALL Tesla cars sold which includes the much more expensive Model S and Model X as well as the Model 3. You cannot evaluate the profitability of one car by conflating it's sales with that of another.
    6) Half of Tesla's loss is accounted for by their R&D expenditures.
    7) No Tesla will NOT have to raise prices to achieve profitability. If you think their current P&L shows this you don't understand how accounting works.

  6. Gross margin != Profit Margin by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Here's a good example of a real-life measurement you can use to determine how much fabrication goes into the average AC statement, because Tesla has around a 20% profit margin per car

    You are talking about Gross Margin which is NOT the same thing as Profit Margin. Gross Margin is the sales revenue minus the parts and labor directly used to build the vehicle. It does not include engineering, sales, marketing, R&D, financing, interest, taxes, overhead, and a multitude of different costs. Profit Margin only comes after all those other costs are taken into account.

    That said, Tesla's Gross Margin is comparable to that of Toyota and FAR less than that of luxury brands like Ferrari (around 50% gross margin). It's a solid number for a company in that particular industry but nothing remarkable either. Ford's gross margin is lower because of some labor cost issues and loses non-truck vehicles but Ford has a NET profit to the tune of billions of dollars a year. Even really profitable car companies generally have profit margins measured in single digit percentages. But when you do billions in sales a year that adds up to a pretty big number. Walmart has low margins too but nobody is arguing they aren't profitable. Tesla's Gross margins should give confidence that they CAN get to profitability but they have some hurdles to get there - most notably their debt burden.

  7. Re:Good - but only like other manufacturers by Whorhay · · Score: 2

    As others have pointed out already, the Model 3 earned a 5 star rating in every category, which is a rare accomplishment. The NHTSA frequently hands out overall 5 star ratings to vehicles that had lower marks in a number of categories.