Slashdot Mirror


Microplastics Can Spread Via Flying Insects, Research Shows (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian: Microplastic can escape from polluted waters via flying insects, new research has revealed, contaminating new environments and threatening birds and other creatures that eat the insects. Scientists fed microplastics to mosquito larvae, which live in water, but found that the particles remained inside the animals as they transformed into flying adults. Other recent research found that half of the mayfly and caddisfly larvae in rivers in Wales contained microplastics. The new study, published in the journal Biology Letters, used Culex pipiens mosquitoes, as they are found across the world in many habitats. The researchers found the larvae readily consumed fluorescent microplastic particles that were 0.0002cm in size. The larvae matured into a non-feeding pupa stage and then emerged as adult mosquitoes, which still had significant microplastic within them. The researchers are now studying if this damages the mosquitoes. Professor Amanda Callaghan, at the University of Reading, UK, says it is "highly likely" that other flying insects that begin as water larvae will also eat and retain microplastics. Furthermore, animals that feed on insects, like birds, bats, and spiders, are likely also consuming microplastics.

18 of 38 comments (clear)

  1. Ozzy by SqueakyMouse · · Score: 2

    And Ozzy Osbourne eats bats, so he is consuming plastic too. Nobody eat Ozzy Osbourne, or you're just making the problem worse.

    1. Re:Ozzy by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1, Funny

      And Ozzy Osbourne eats bats, so he is consuming plastic too. Nobody eat Ozzy Osbourne, or you're just making the problem worse.

      Plastic would be the less concerning pollutant you might pick up from eating Ozzy Osbourne.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  2. Re:OMG OMG OMG by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2, Funny

    Between this and global warming, I'm pretty sure that there will not be a planet Earth in 50 years from now.

    Earth will be a giant ball of plastic.

    What if all this is planned? What if the blackhole at the centre of our galaxy is a cosmic-sized amazon package and all the stars orbiting it are just cosmic-sized packing peanuts.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  3. Re:OMG OMG OMG by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Sorry... that sounded trippy... I took a bite of Ozzy Osbourne earlier.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  4. Easy solution then by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Kill all flying insects!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Easy solution then by KiloByte · · Score: 2

      I do not eat insects. No bird we commonly eat eats insects either. My cat is too lazy to hunt birds these days. Thus -- mosquitoes having health problems? What's the downside?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Easy solution then by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I do not eat insects. No bird we commonly eat eats insects either. My cat is too lazy to hunt birds these days. Thus -- mosquitoes having health problems? What's the downside?

      Chickens absolutely would eat insects... when they can. Nowadays they're all raised in tiny little cages though so probably won't get to eat many.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  5. Re:OMG OMG OMG by olsmeister · · Score: 1

    Dude.... don't eatway the asticplay

  6. Carlin knew... by Iwastheone · · Score: 2

    The planet has been through a lot worse than us. Been through earthquakes, volcanoes, plate tectonics, continental drift, solar flares, sun spots, magnetic storms, the magnetic reversal of the poles hundreds of thousands of years of bombardment by comets and asteroids and meteors, worldwide floods, tidal waves, worldwide fires, erosion, cosmic rays, recurring ice ages And we think some plastic bags and some aluminum cans are going to make a difference? The planet isn’t going anywhere. WE are! We’re going away. Pack your shit, folks. We’re going away. And we won’t leave much of a trace, either. Maybe a little Styrofoam The planet’ll be here and we’ll be long gone. Just another failed mutation. Just another closed-end biological mistake. An evolutionary cul-de-sac. The planet’ll shake us off like a bad case of fleas. The planet will be here for a long, long, LONG time after we’re gone, and it will heal itself, it will cleanse itself, ’cause that’s what it does. It’s a self-correcting system. The air and the water will recover, the earth will be renewed. And if it’s true that plastic is not degradable, well, the planet will simply incorporate plastic into a new paradigm: the earth plus plastic. The earth doesn’t share our prejudice toward plastic. Plastic came out of the earth. The earth probably sees plastic as just another one of its children. Could be the only reason the earth allowed us to be spawned from it in the first place. It wanted plastic for itself. Didn’t know how to make it. Needed us. Could be the answer to our age-old egocentric philosophical question, “Why are we here?” Plastic asshole. - George Carlin https://www.goodreads.com/quot...

  7. well that explains by mandark1967 · · Score: 3, Funny

    how plastic flowers are pollinated

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
  8. The conflation continues by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    This is continuation of media cycle, where they need something scary to sell the views/papers.

    Microplastics (referenced correctly by name in this one) are harmless. They are biologically inert and mechanically harmless. They're so small, they're able to travel through the cell walls, and as a result, have no meaningful mechanical impact as far as we know.

    Main source of these plastics is washing and drying clothes.

    The desperate conflation is with plastic garbage problem in the oceans, which does in fact kill birds and other wildlife, as is hinted by last paragraph in the OP. Those are completely different issue, as they exist in much larger size and their source is plastic garbage being ground to fairly small (but nowhere near microplastics level) of size.

    1. Re:The conflation continues by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      "May be", "possibly" and "can do" are beloved words of people who intentionally conflate things. They give a premise that inspires fear, uncertainty and doubt, without actually making the claim they imply they are.

      For example, it's pretty obvious that bacteria inside one's body will be recognised and targeted by white cells and other elements of human immune system regardless of particulates that are smaller than said bacteria in size that maybe end up inside the bacteria or be attached to it.

      This sort of conflation is usually coupled with utter ignorance of the subject matter, down to in this case, ignorance of relevant sizes. These particulates are smaller than bacteria, and in some edge cases, about as big as medium and small sized bacteria.

    2. Re:The conflation continues by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure grey goo isn't going to be "plastic", considering what "plastic" actually means. The entire point of destructive nanomachinery is to fit an actual machine into nanometre-sized assembly.

      These plastics are by definition, thousands of times too big and considering what "plastic" actually means, it's going to be rather counterproductive to try to build a nanomachine out of a really long chain of hydrocarbons. Since that would unnecessarily increase the size into, you guessed it, micrometres.

  9. Cleanup by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Maybe we could engineer insects to eat it all and then fly into traps.

  10. Re:Very misleading article. by Mark+of+the+North · · Score: 1

    What natural cause would produce plastics found in and on flying insects? In this case, correlation absolutely does mean causation, because there can be man-made plastics are the only possible explanation. But stick to your conspiracy theories. You are in good company.

  11. Re:LUCKYO IS A WELL KNOWN LYING FAGGOT by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    Did I fuck you and not call the day after?

  12. New paradigm: Earth + Plastic by devslash0 · · Score: 1

    The planet will be here for a long, long, LONG time after we’re gone, and it will heal itself, it will cleanse itself, ’cause that’s what it does. It’s a self-correcting system. The air and the water will recover, the earth will be renewed. And if it’s true that plastic is not degradable, well, the planet will simply incorporate plastic into a new paradigm: the earth plus plastic. The earth doesn’t share our prejudice toward plastic. Plastic came out of the earth. The earth probably sees plastic as just another one of its children. Could be the only reason the earth allowed us to be spawned from it in the first place. It wanted plastic for itself. Didn’t know how to make it. Needed us. Could be the answer to our age-old egocentric philosophical question,

    “Why are we here?"

    Plastic... asshole.

    from "Saving the planet" by George Carlin.

  13. Yeah for Capitalism! by fredrated · · Score: 1

    Poisoning everything it touches, but profit!