Slashdot Mirror


Apple Releases macOS Mojave Featuring Dark Mode and Other Features; Earlier Today a Security Researcher Published 0Day Bypass For a Privacy Bug in the new OS

Apple on Monday made available to the public macOS Mojave -- aka macOS 10.14, the latest major update to its desktop operating system. From a report: Though Mojave is substantially focused on under-the-hood improvements, it includes several major changes to the Mac's Finder, as well as a small collection of apps that were ported from iOS. On the Finder side, Apple has introduced a system-wide Dark Mode, which optionally reskins the entire user interface with black or dark gray elements. Dark Mode pairs up with Dynamic Desktop, which can automatically adjust certain desktop images in sync with time of day (morning, afternoon, and evening) changes. Minutes ahead of the release, Patrick Wardle, chief researcher officer at Digita Security, tweeted a video of an apparent privacy feature bypass that's designed to prevent apps from improperly accessing a user's personal data. From a report: For years, Macs have forced apps to ask for permission before accessing your contacts and calendar after some iOS apps were caught uploading private data. Apple said at its annual developer conference this year that it would expand the feature to include apps asking for permission to access the camera, microphone, email and backups. Wardle told TechCrunch that his findings are "not a universal bypass" of the feature, but that the bug could allow a malicious app to grab certain protected data, such as a user's contacts, when a user is logged in.

72 comments

  1. Is that a title or summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I barely got through the title before I needed a rest.

    1. Re: Is that a title or summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 ?
      I thought this was funny.

    2. Re:Is that a title or summary? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      They had to get the obligatory Apple slam in there and put the 'M$' in msmash

    3. Re: Is that a title or summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zZZZzZz

    4. Re:Is that a title or summary? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I was dozing off too, but then I perked up when I heard that my rest home was having applesauce for lunch!

  2. LOL fuck apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    better double down on security and writing stable code apple.

  3. A nice stability/speed release by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm pretty happy that Apple occasionally does releases meant more to improve speed and stability than just pile on features.

    This is one of those releases, it makes my older MacBook Pro feel a bit faster, especially along with improvements to speed made in Xcode 10.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:A nice stability/speed release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who farted?

    2. Re:A nice stability/speed release by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Yeah, who cares if it uploads all your contacts to anyone who asks for it? It has a cool new Dark Mode and changing images based on the time of day.

    3. Re:A nice stability/speed release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shills gonna shill.

    4. Re:A nice stability/speed release by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      I respect any company that can take a step and have a major code iteration be a refactor. I don't mind having a release just be bug fixes and security improvements. That to me, is more important than new features.

    5. Re:A nice stability/speed release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your MBP using a hard disk or an SSD for internal memory storage?

      I've been operating under the impression that 10.13 is intended for SSDs, and that older hard disks will have latency issues due to the way APFS interacts according to 10.13 requirements.

    6. Re:A nice stability/speed release by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      I respect any company that can take a step and have a major code iteration be a refactor. I don't mind having a release just be bug fixes and security improvements. That to me, is more important than new features.

      At this point in the game, it is.

    7. Re:A nice stability/speed release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The user would still have to run software that uses this exploit, the OS itself is not going to upload the users contacts to third parties. And if the application is sand-boxed, which a lot of trusted applications are, the user would have to grant it permission to access their home drive. Of course many users download un-sandboxed applications from the internet and run them, and some users choose to run software that isn't safe. So it's not as simple as you seem to imply in your comment.

      Keep in mind that this exploit exposes a vulnerability in a security feature that doesn't even exist in the previous versions of macOS (e.g. High Sierra), so users would be safer if they upgrade, especially sense the researcher has not published the details on how to exploit it.

    8. Re: A nice stability/speed release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they removed more throttling, eh?

    9. Re:A nice stability/speed release by magusxxx · · Score: 1

      I can't believe people are excited over the time-of-day screen saver. About 20 years ago there was a program called Sundial which did exactly the same thing.

      --
      Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  4. Why?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Apple OS 9.xx was perfectly adequate. I was happy with it. Installing OS X broke my mac. I had to reinstall os 9.

    All this fancy OS X is nothing but bloat. The kind of bloat some busy body brown noser thinks is a good idea at a mon day morning office meeting. Bloat to create useless programmer jobs equivalent to " téléphone desanatiser " or "management consultant" of Hitchhikers Guide.

    Bloat designed to support bloated websites full of memory/CPU cl9gging advertisement.

    This is too much. I'm finished. Apple boycott for life

    1. Re:Why?! by omnichad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OS 9.x was way more buggy than you remember. Being built on bsd code makes OS X way more stable (at least after 10.2). Now, it may have reached its peak somewhere between Snow Leopard and Lion, but that's another debate. Breaking compatibility with their own pro apps just to force you to their app store versions is one of the worse things to come since.

    2. Re: Why?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those were simpler times. I ran only 1 or 2 programmes at once.

    3. Re:Why?! by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Apple OS 9.xx was perfectly adequate. I was happy with it. Installing OS X broke my mac. I had to reinstall os 9.

      All this fancy OS X is nothing but bloat. The kind of bloat some busy body brown noser thinks is a good idea at a mon day morning office meeting. Bloat to create useless programmer jobs equivalent to " téléphone desanatiser " or "management consultant" of Hitchhikers Guide.

      Bloat designed to support bloated websites full of memory/CPU cl9gging advertisement.

      This is too much. I'm finished. Apple boycott for life

      You're an illiterate, COWARDLY idiot.

      GTFO.

    4. Re: Why?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You act like by posting under "the real Tim Cook" you aren't anonymous and somehow better than an AC. Put your real name behind it you Apple shill.

    5. Re:Why?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an illiterate, COWARDLY idiot.

      -

      $5,000 cash reward for the above person's name and home address. More cash available for info such as SSN.

      No questions asked. Post a disposable email address and I will contact you.

    6. Re: Why?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck do you have any karma?

    7. Re:Why?! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      OS X is built on Unix. OS 9 was built on being pointlessly different from Windows.

    8. Re:Why?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Classic Mac OS came before Windows, and it was Windows that was trying to be different. But not pointlessly; it had to be different enough from the Mac to beat Apple's "look and feel" lawsuit!

  5. incremental updates just cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is not a good reason. ill update when there is actually something wort updating for. Sadly with apple its essenially never now.

    1. Re:incremental updates just cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      something wort updating for. Sadly with apple its essenially never now.

      Upgrade to Windows 10 and get free Candy Crush, again and again and again and again. No matter how many times you delete it, it comes right back. Truely the gift that keeps on giving.

  6. Re: LOL more like Crapple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lmao, also WinBlow$

    Linux rules!

  7. A new theme LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess that counts as "innovation" nowadays.

  8. Privacy bug? by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

    Who cares about privacy bugs? We have a Dark Mode.

    - SuperKendall

    1. Re: Privacy bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Courage!"

    2. Re:Privacy bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about privacy bugs? We have a Dark Mode. - SuperKendall

      Who cares about privacy? We gave Google!

    3. Re:Privacy bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Windows 10 has had for over a year.

      Big Whup. If this is the best feature - the you guys are really screwed.

  9. Tired of Dark Themes now I can't get rid of them! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Windows 10, Most Linux Distibutions, and now OS X all seem to like this Dark theme. It was cool for a while, but trying to install a Light Theme is nearly impossible now, and all new apps seems to want to use it as well.

    Sure it looks all Sci-Fi. but in a retro way.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  10. Wrong source by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, who cares if it uploads all your contacts to anyone who asks for it?

    IDK, why not ask every Android user?

    BURN

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Wrong source by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      I will. I will also ask every Mac Fanboy too. Do you know any?

    2. Re:Wrong source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will. I will also ask every Mac Fanboy too. Do you know any?

      There aren't any, you Apple Haters made them up.

  11. macOS 9.x is gone, we can cheer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I used to use Macs in the 9.xx days. Cooperative multitasking, where one program could completely hang the system unless it calls WaitNextEvent() resulted in a relatively unstable OS build, especially if you used a lot of programs. I remember having to restart constantly, to the point where when I needed to change tasks, I restarted.

    OS X is far more stable. One crappy app can be killed, and life move on.

    1. Re:macOS 9.x is gone, we can cheer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to use Macs in the 9.xx days. Cooperative multitasking, where one program could completely hang the system unless it calls WaitNextEvent() resulted in a relatively unstable OS build, especially if you used a lot of programs. I remember having to restart constantly, to the point where when I needed to change tasks, I restarted.

      OS X is far more stable. One crappy app can be killed, and life move on.

      There was a key combo to enter some command line mode (I can't remember precisely what, but I did back then). If you wrote "g finder", it would jump to finder, meaning you could leave applications even if they were stuck in a loop.

      If you care about realtime tasks, MacOS classic is better than MacOS X or windows.

      I would say System 7.1 still stands as a really good OS. It was before MacOS classic became bloated. It was really stable and ran fine even on a 16 MHz CPU. I'm not saying I want it back, but it wasn't as bad as you make it out to though MacOS 9 did become a bit bloated towards the end.

    2. Re:macOS 9.x is gone, we can cheer by Etcetera · · Score: 2

      I used to use Macs in the 9.xx days. Cooperative multitasking, where one program could completely hang the system unless it calls WaitNextEvent() resulted in a relatively unstable OS build, especially if you used a lot of programs.

      I don't know... Thinking back on things, I'd actually say that I tended to have *more* applications (though not background services) running at a time then than I do now, but that's partly because the promise of the Browser-As-Platform is way more a possibility now than then.

      I had been a Mac user since System 6 though, and I think Mac OS 8.6 was actually pretty damn stable for me. Cooperative multitasking can't fight against application bugs, but the generally slower rate of change for apps meant that those with bugs were more liable to be identified. Of course, flaky extensions could still ruin your day, but that was really always the case, and we all knew that things like Kalidescope could cause problems.

      On the whole, I suspect apps' requirement for WNE loops (or, heaven forbid, GNE) forced some to always consider the need to relinquish control on a shared system. Nowadays it feels like apps ignore that complete and demand the kernel figure it out -- safer, no doubt, but I'm not sure it's completely *better*.

      In any event, I left Mac world just as the OS X made it from Rhapsody to release, and after ages in Windows/Linux re-introduced myself to it in 2011. A different world. Not better; just meeting different needs.

    3. Re:macOS 9.x is gone, we can cheer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a key combo to enter some command line mode (I can't remember precisely what, but I did back then). If you wrote "g finder", it would jump to finder, meaning you could leave applications even if they were stuck in a loop.

      I think that was Microbug:

      https://www.fenestrated.net/mirrors/Apple%20Technotes%20(As%20of%202002)/tn/tn1136.html

    4. Re:macOS 9.x is gone, we can cheer by Megane · · Score: 1

      The best part for me was how you had to wait nine whole seconds after waking up your laptop before you could do anything with it. This was because the Open Transport networking sat around twiddling its fingers. I installed OS X Public Beta, and it let me use my laptop right away. But it also ran the battery down because it didn't sleep all the hardware properly. So OS X really did "broke my mac", because they hadn't learned yet to stop trickle charging until the battery went below 95%. The battery was dead in a year.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    5. Re:macOS 9.x is gone, we can cheer by Megane · · Score: 1

      That was Macsbug, a machine-language monitor. I would hardly call that a "command line mode", since all it let you do was examine and change the CPU registers.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  12. Kendall is illiterate and childish but also boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/24/security-researcher-claims-macos-mojave-privacy-bug-on-launch-day/

  13. Re:SuperBlathering Ken Doll blathers nothings agai by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 0

    Who cares how happy you are with an incremental update you obsequious toady? You're a store-bought bitch Ken Doll lol, but why would you think anyone is interested in your vanilla-after-vanilla reviews?

    None of what you say matters even a little bit, and this is just another one of those times. Get a life, get a job. Walmart needs boring greeters like you.

    So sez the COWARD...

    Log In and Lose Karma like a Man!

  14. Re:SuperBlathering Ken Doll blathers nothings agai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sez the apple worshiping asshole

  15. Finally dark mode in Xcode! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the company that prides itself on interface design and "user experience" it sure took them long enough. God, Xcode fucking sucks, but with this update it sucks a little bit less.

  16. Re:SuperBlathering Ken Doll blathers nothings agai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sorry, I will ask Apple for a refund for the cost of how much macOS 10.14 cost me out of pocket... i.e. $0.

  17. Dark Mode? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, who the fuck thinks that having an additional skin merits inclusion in the headline?

    Especially when half the users are going to be staring at a bright white word processor screen most of the time anyway?

    1. Re:Dark Mode? Seriously? by Megane · · Score: 1

      Considering that Apple has changed the main OS theme skin in every other release, without any option to use the old one, I'd say that was headline news. Two themes at the same time? What's next, UI sound effects?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  18. Re:Tired of Dark Themes now I can't get rid of the by dgood · · Score: 2

    Come on, you didn't even need to RTA! It's right there in the summary:

    system-wide Dark Mode, which optionally reskins the entire user interface with black or dark gray elements

    If you don't want Dark Mode, just turn it off. You don't have to install a "Light Theme".

  19. motif in early 1900s allowed any colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    back in the early 1990s, i remember motif allowed me to change the color of anything on the screen - and in 2018, we have a binary choice between all-white/all-black "mode" for the screen? that's progress?

    1. Re:motif in early 1900s allowed any colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words: Hotdog Stand

      (Or is that three words?)

  20. Re:Tired of Dark Themes now I can't get rid of the by ThomasD3 · · Score: 2

    you don't have to turn it off, you just have to not turn it on

  21. Re:SuperBlathering Ken Doll blathers nothings agai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apple gives away the OS because YOU are the product!

  22. Re:SuperBlathering Ken Doll blathers nothings agai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, not like how things are over there at Google/Android! You tell 'em!

  23. Dark mode for the web by cerberusss · · Score: 1

    If you have Firefox on the mac, check out this extension:
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...

    It basically allows you to darkify (is that a word?) all websites. ALL of them. It has a slider if you want to play with the intensity of the darkifying. You can exclude certain sites, of course. With a whitelist. Yea no, I'm not kidding, it's called a whitelist.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  24. Re:Tired of Dark Themes now I can't get rid of the by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Also, AFAIK, Apple's dark mode is not "everything dark all the time" but instead adjusts your desktop and apps according to the time of day. Light during the day, darker in the evening and dark during night time.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  25. Re:SuperBlathering Ken Doll blathers nothings agai by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    apple gives away the OS because YOU are the product!

    PROVE it, or GTFO!!!

  26. Re: Tired of Dark Themes now I can't get rid of th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Dark Mode' is everything dark all the time. Changing the desktop based on time of day is something different.

  27. So that's what this year's fashion will be. by Chelloveck · · Score: 2

    "Dark" is the new "flat". Can't wait for green text to become all the rage, too.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  28. Touting themes...in 2018? by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 2

    Did some project manager at Apple fire up their 25-year old 486 running Windows 3.1, play with theme settings, and think "How can we market this today"?

    Apple really is running out of ideas.

  29. Installed .. it's faster, but Dark Mode naaaaaaaa by niks42 · · Score: 2

    Dark Mode lasted about three minutes. It's garbage and hurt my eyes.

    Give me proper skins like Gnome.

  30. It's like déjà vu all over again! by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 2

    This reminds me of that time that Apple released a version of iMacOSx that allowed people to gain root by just pressing enter with no password.

    I love Apple's new beta-testing program... where they release beta software as if it's release-ready, to find the bugs they used to find and crush BEFORE releasing their new OS to the general user populace.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    1. Re:It's like déjà vu all over again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they took a page out of Microsoft's book. That page is called "test on the users"......

  31. Apples new China style Rating system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shows that apple is not trustworthy now on par with Google and Microsoft.

  32. why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, I do not understand this.

    Managers come in and say something must be done so it looks like something was done by them.

    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

    Stop making new software. We've had databases since the 60s or earlier. We've had email for 30+ years. STOP INTRODUCING SECURITY VULNERABILITIES!!!

    What else do you need? Why would any sane person want a microphone in there house that controls things?

  33. Re:Installed .. it's faster, but Dark Mode naaaaaa by Megane · · Score: 1

    At night I prefer to just set my backlight to minimum level. The only thing worse than dark mode is forced dark mode. I have made custom CSS for a couple of web sites I regularly read (one of them is Hackaday) to override that eye cancer.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }