Slashdot Mirror
Most Drivers Don't Understand Limitations of Car Safety Systems, AAA Finds (usatoday.com)
A new study by AAA found that most drivers don't understand the limitations of advanced safety technology installed on their new vehicles. "The study indicates that drivers overestimate the capabilities of features such as blind-spot monitoring systems, automatic emergency braking and adaptive cruise control," reports USA Today. "The findings raise questions about whether Americans are ready to adapt to partially self-driving vehicles, which typically require drivers to remain alert and ready to take over the steering wheel if the car can't handle the conditions it encounters." Here are the problem spots flagged by AAA:
- Blind-spot monitoring: Nearly 80 percent of drivers don't understand the limitations or thought that the system had greater capability to detect fast-approaching vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians. Relying too much on blind-spot monitoring, about 25 percent don't look for oncoming vehicles when they change lanes.
- Forward-collision warning and automatic emergency braking: Many drivers confuse the two. One is a warning system, while the other takes action. More than 40 percent of drivers don't know these limitations.
- Adaptive cruise control: About 29 percent of drivers who use this system, which accelerates and brakes on its own, are sometimes comfortable "engaging in other activities" while the system is activated, according to the study. The researchers did note that these safety features can prevent about 40 percent of crashes and 30 percent of crash deaths.
- Forward-collision warning and automatic emergency braking: Many drivers confuse the two. One is a warning system, while the other takes action. More than 40 percent of drivers don't know these limitations.
- Adaptive cruise control: About 29 percent of drivers who use this system, which accelerates and brakes on its own, are sometimes comfortable "engaging in other activities" while the system is activated, according to the study. The researchers did note that these safety features can prevent about 40 percent of crashes and 30 percent of crash deaths.
No matter how you look at it, having a human in the loop is a setup for failure. Public transportation yet again solves this problem in addition to just about every other problem you can think of.
Hire a well-paid, attentive train driver, hold him to the flame, and be done with it.
the individuals are not even bothering to check behind them, or check their side mirrors, etc.because the safety devices in the cars would warn them. The industry has been dumbing down driving. I have always seen this as a problem. You tell individuals buy our car and you won't need to worry about something they won't.
;)
Also if the safety devices may be perfect, How are driver less cars to work at this point in the development cycle. I believe in driver less cars but feel they are further in our future than most think.
Note the Tesla driver putting his car on auto pilot and then watching a movie before his wreak. Can't say that was really Tesla's fault! They say your supposed to be poised with your hands hovering over the wheel and aware of the situation and be ready to take control. In that case I would just be doing the driving to help me stay aware and awake.
Just my 2 cents
> the car should stop moving.
FYI, that's one of the more dangerous things you can do. You're quite likely to get rear-ended or T-boned. Some people's default reaction of stomping on the brakes whenever something unexpected happens is a leading cause of accidents.
Whether or not it's the rule, you're a fecking idiot not to.
For a start, airbags are about one tenth as effective without them.
And the reason that countries have it against the law for even your passengers to not wear seatbelts is: that them being fired into you at 130+mph when you have a head-on crash kills them, you and people around you. You survive the impact because of your own belt and airbag and crumple zones and then the fucking 60kg lump behind you hits you at 130mph and shoves you into the remains of your dash and wheel and airbag. You can literally launch people through the windscreen at that speed.
This guy sounds like EVERY point he brings up is to demonstrate exactly how he's the PRECISE category of person the article is aimed at. All kinds of warnings and he wants to turn them all off and ignore them, rather than drive such they aren't activated, and without even the basics of a seat-belt.
I honestly, genuinely hope the guy hits a static lamp-post or something - anything that'll show him he isn't the better judge of speed and distance, and why you want to wear a seatbelt whether it's law or not, and without hurting anyone else but himself. But, no, he's the type who'll take out a family coming the other way because he drifted out of lane, spent 20 seconds shutting off the warning, then it was too late to brake because he wasn't paying attention.
P.S. you get in my car, you put the belt on. It's not optional. I don't care if you're 8 or 80. Even though adult passengers have their own responsibility in my country (myself and any children are my responsibility as the driver). Literally, you take it off, I'm stopping the car. You refuse, you're walking. You "unclip" later in the journey, I'm stopping again.
Not because I'm a 20mph-everywhere kind of guy - because I ain't gonna visit you in hospital, or pay my insurance excess for you to try to claim your injuries against me, or deal with the paperwork of you being dead and proving that I advised you otherwise. I also ain't going to let your kids see you do that if you're with me.
No belt, no drive. It was the first English that my Italian relatives/friends (including kids) learned from me, because they're quite lax over there and when I was driving, even if it was "nono"'s car, they were having their belts on. There was no negotiation possible.
P.S. the fucking beeping warnings are there for a reason.