Slashdot Mirror


Satellite Company Partners With Jeff Bezos' AWS To Bring Internet To 'Whole Planet' (cnbc.com)

Iridium Communications is partnering with Amazon Web Services to develop a satellite-based network called CloudConnect for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. "We're really covering the whole planet [...] with terrestrial networks today it's still only 10 percent or 20 percent" of the Earth, Iridium CEO Matt Desch told CNBC. "Everybody today can connect pretty easily with very little effort. Now that Amazon has put our language into the cloud platform, they can extend their applications to the satellite realm." From the report: CloudConnect, which the company expects to launch in 2019, makes Iridium "the first, and only, satellite provider now connected to" Amazon Web Services, Desch said. The CloudConnect network will focus on "where cellular technologies aren't," Desch said, bringing the rest of the world within reach of AWS. The company is nearly finished putting its Iridium NEXT constellation of 75 satellites into orbit. SpaceX is launching the $3 billion satellite network for Iridium, with the eighth and final launch happening later this year.

Once online, Iridium NEXT will offer services such as higher broadband communications speeds and global airplane tracking. Iridium describes the IoT aspect of the network as a "catalyst for strong subscriber growth." Desch said the network hosts "about half a million" active devices, growing at a rate of about 20 percent per year for the last three years. With AWS onboard, Desch gave a very bullish estimates for his IoT services: "Easily this could expand to tens of millions of devices."

60 comments

  1. More like BezosNet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who's thinking this is gonna end dystopic? With some kind of global ... what's the opposite of net neutrality? ... scheme?

    I mean the purpose of this is not some grand altruistic act to improve the planet. Nobody would disagree there.
    The one and only purpose of this is to exponentially raise profits for Bezos and this company. Because in the society they are from, anyone who doesn't act like that kind of psychopath, is either bankrupt or dead.

    Nevermind that literally every healthy process in nature is a system of perfect cycles in a delicate but stable balance. (Aka "stagnation" (aka "depression") in business terms.) And anything that isn't, is either an explosion, or a deadly pathogen. (Their motto is "Why not *both*?" anyway.)
    Growth, growth, growing growth, *growingly* growing growth, until the entire universe is filled with cancer and every single thing is a lifeless husk stuffed with pointless money.

    You know what's to do. ... But good night anyway. --.--

  2. Can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To spend $5 to send 1KB from my IoT platform

    1. Re:Can't wait by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      overage is $15 meg at full speed or $0 / meg at 56K speed.

  3. Telling how these people think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't that have been "bringing AWS within reach of the rest of the world"
    instead of "bringing the rest of the world within reach of AWS"?

  4. we need lightening fast coms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so as to not miss any of the same 5 stories 5X each day after day... on all the media mongrel outlets.. never a better time to to consider ourselves in relation to our contemporaries, our surroundings, & our beleaguered spirits.. cease fire stand down,, there are moms & babys in every town all the world around.. thanks again

    1. Re:we need lightening fast coms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is "lightening" fast? You mean make a color lighter quickly?

  5. Explore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The nearest ice-cream shop is 3900 kilometers away in Ushuaia"

    Yay!

    1. Re: Explore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can make ice cream from tree bark and plants if necessary. It also doubles as a healing salve. â" Internet Frontier Man

  6. Countries must control their own communications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Did you learn nothing from the NSA and CIA leaks? If you let an American company run your communications infrastructure, then both them and their government will be all up in your internets.

    This also requires avoiding American communication equipment. You cannot afford the risk to take the deal offered by Juniper, Cisco, and other American vendors, so they can get inside your networks. A good choice would be Ericsson or Nokia telecom equipment, since they are both neutral and have no allegiance to any government or political entities, and (unlike American vendors) have never been discovered to backdoor their equipment.

  7. Now Downloading Monetization, Pls Wait For Toast by mentil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great, more bandwidth for my fridge. And once they run out of repositioning fuel there'll be 75 more pieces of space junk in orbit. I wonder how many 'dark satellites' there are in orbit that are technically functional yet have been abandoned because they're no longer able to maintain the desired orbit. I bet enthusiasts could do some interesting things if given access to those.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  8. Re:Now Downloading Monetization, Pls Wait For Toas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how many 'dark satellites' there are in orbit that are technically functional yet have been abandoned because they're no longer able to maintain the desired orbit. I bet enthusiasts could do some interesting things if given access to those.

    there are currently 1 980 active satellites in orbit. Whilst this is 13.92% increase over the number of active satellites last year, it still represents only 40% of the satellites orbiting the planet.

    This means that there are 2 877 pieces of useless metal hurtling around the Earth at high speed!

    Source

    It's easy to find inactive satellite numbers. Active but not in use due to a specific cause would take serious research and then only supply a minimum.

    Casual check for satellites in the wrong orbit but active: at least 24 satellites. [1] [2] [3] [4]

  9. how is this going to help 3rd world countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That cant even feed or water themselves?
    They dont even have computers.

    They can't eat or drink data.....

    1. Re:how is this going to help 3rd world countries by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      They also don't have money to buy crap from Amazon, so why should Jeff give a fuck about them?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. Define Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  11. By hole planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he means his arsehole. This headline means Jeff just stuck a wifi router up his anus. Hope this clears things up.

  12. no thanks usa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thank your trade policy to no thanks

  13. dystopian by astrofurter · · Score: 1

    This will be immensely useful when our masters begin using their robot army to genocide the global working class.

  14. Fuck Bezos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and Amazon.

    1. Re:Fuck Bezos by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Bezos is not that attractive.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  15. Re:Now Downloading Monetization, Pls Wait For Toas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's not how satellites work. Their fuel budget includes a burn for deorbit (LEO) or pushing out into a graveyard orbit (GEO).

  16. What happened to similar Google plan? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    What happened to similar Google plan?

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  17. Re:Now Downloading Monetization, Pls Wait For Toas by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Informative

    Great, more bandwidth for my fridge. And once they run out of repositioning fuel there'll be 75 more pieces of space junk in orbit.

    Actually, Iridium's NEXT constellation is for a lot more than just IoT, they are for L-band (up to 1.5 Mbit/s) and K-band (up to 8 Mbit/s) communications. These are extremely desirable and will only go out of use if they enter an uncontrolled orbit. Each satellite has a deorbitting system. "From 2017, several first-generation Iridium satellites have been deliberately de-orbited after being replaced by operational Iridium NEXT satellites"

    I wonder how many 'dark satellites' there are in orbit that are technically functional yet have been abandoned because they're no longer able to maintain the desired orbit. I bet enthusiasts could do some interesting things if given access to those.

    Communication satellites like this? I can answer that: Zero.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  18. This is actually interesting by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've got a cabin way out in the boonies where I can't get strong internet. It sounds more realistic than the whole google balloons project.

    1. Re:This is actually interesting by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      I've got a cabin way out in the boonies where I can't get strong internet.
      It sounds more realistic than the whole google balloons project.

      They already have satellite internet that works anywhere in North America but it's expensive, slow, and really horrible ping times. It also requires a satellite dish. Not sure what this service actually is targetted at. When I think IoT, I think small devices and satellites like this are very low bandwidth. GPS gets away with small devices because it is only one way communication. Bulky low bandwidth devices seem to be a niche application for maybe some odd telemetry where regular internet doesn't exist. Maybe monitoring ocean temperatures?

    2. Re: This is actually interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cost will be cheap too! Just a few souls per kilobyte downloaded need to be given to Satan, a few more if you want to upload.

    3. Re:This is actually interesting by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      They already have satellite internet that works anywhere in North America but it's expensive, slow, and really horrible ping times. It also requires a satellite dish. Not sure what this service actually is targetted at.

      Expensive? Yes. But not horribly. Not, in fact, as expensive as Iridium service was. It's $100/mo-ish. Slow? Not by US standards. I can get 20 Mbps on Exede. Horrible ping times? Yes. They are ~1 second. However, you are not accounting for the biggest problem with satellite internet, aiming. There are currently zero North American mobile satellite providers. The best service you can hope to get is one which will let you re-aim three times a year without fees, and the aiming process involves a service call. They don't have to come out and do it for you, but you do have to make a phone appointment. There is supposed to be another service spinning up with auto-aiming in the next couple of years, but there is nothing right now. That means that for example RVers who actually move around have to use cellular, not satellite. This is not that useful for fixed installations, but if it doesn't require constant re-aiming, it will be highly useful for other applications.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:This is actually interesting by ezdiy · · Score: 1

      Iridium LEO is bulky in the space (massive constellation of about a hundred birds), but on the ground the can be as small as a GPS receiver.

      Just like GPS, pointing *anywhere* on the sky you hit a beam - you hear the packets with a piece of wire (though you need something reasonably directional if you want to transmit). The current issue with iridium is that most of the birds are jurassic 90s tech, low bandwidth and a lot of needless time multiplexing make it kinda suck. Modern birds can do 10-30ms at hundreds of mbits per beam - it is mere 2000-5000km round trip to the bird nearest to you after all.

      This is very unlike GEO which is super cost efficient, but also 100,000km round trip. A single bird can cover continent, but you have to aim very precisely with a high gain gear on the ground,

    5. Re:This is actually interesting by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      I know dish has an autoaiming satellite for tailgating and RVs. I'm assuming a similar technology would work fine for satellite internet.

    6. Re:This is actually interesting by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I know dish has an autoaiming satellite for tailgating and RVs. I'm assuming a similar technology would work fine for satellite internet.

      One would assume so, but I've looked around, and there is nothing like that on the market right now. Like I said, there's supposed to be something like that within a couple of years, and I could swear there used to be something like that, but it seems to be gone now.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  19. Internet of OUTDOOR Things by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
    My understanding was that Iridium phones couldn't receive a satellite signal inside buildings. If this tech is similar then it won't be much use to the billions of devices that reside in the home or office. Though I suppose that like GPS, there will be installations in vehicles that will find it useful

    Now, tell me when I can buy a $10 CloudConnect device from any of the usual chinese suppliers. That is when it will become an interesting technology. Just so long as the subscription fees are in the cent's per month category.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:Internet of OUTDOOR Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct, and power requirements are pretty decent for more than short bursts.

      Third party devices like from Alibaba...not likely. Iridium has a very tough certification program for modems, antennas and even data. Without that you can't get your modems on their network.

      And the subscriptions will still be pricey.

      Though for Oil and Gas customers, this may beat the hell out of Radio modems...

      -Former Iridium two communications certification engineer

    2. Re:Internet of OUTDOOR Things by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      For consumers you would be better off with LoraWan and https://www.thethingsnetwork.o.... You can get cheap $20 devices for that already and no subscription.

  20. Re:Now Downloading Monetization, Pls Wait For Toas by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    This won't be used for consumer stuff, it's way too expensive and too bandwidth limited. They won't be able to deliver ads to your fridge over satellite. That will use your wifi.

    This is for stuff like monitoring pipelines and remote parts of the environment. Drone ships at sea.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  21. Into the cloud ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When your product manager takes the word "Cloud" to literally...

  22. Re:Now Downloading Monetization, Pls Wait For Toas by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    This is for stuff like monitoring pipelines and remote parts of the environment. Drone ships at sea.

    It's cheaper to just run a wire down the pipeline, and connect with a normal satellite installation. But drone ships at sea? Absolutely. Or just anyone who needs to be moving around. You have to re-aim satellite every time you move it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  23. Amazons IoT cloud service !== "the internet" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We already have satellite internet service, this is just a power grab.

  24. Bezos is not used to platform neutrality by Morgaine · · Score: 1

    This Amazon collaboration with Iridium is going to be interesting to watch on the Net Neutrality front.

    As long as Bezos operates an independent walled garden then he's in the clear to make up his own rules, but as soon as he turns CloudConnect into a global ISP (if that is what he is intending) then he'll come under Net Neutrality rules wherever they apply, and that means on most of the planet. The small minority of people who reject Net Neutrality in USA for party political reasons is entirely irrelevent in this global context.

    Since Bezos does not currently provide first-hop connectivity and hence is not running an ISP, his Amazon walled garden does not come under scrutiny on net nor platform neutrality grounds, only on different grounds such as privacy. As a global ISP though, it seems likely that his previous freedom to do as he pleases (for example by benefitting only his Amazon merchants) is going to be curtailed in a manner which he will dislike greatly.

    Facebook seems to be moving in the same direction, and undoubtedly there will be many others too. Net Neutrality of satellite ISPs seems certain to become a major issue.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
    1. Re:Bezos is not used to platform neutrality by lgw · · Score: 1

      As long as Bezos operates an independent walled garden then he's in the clear to make up his own rules, but as soon as he turns CloudConnect into a global ISP (if that is what he is intending) then he'll come under Net Neutrality rules wherever they apply, and that means on most of the planet.

      On the contrary, once the worldwide satellite network is fully operational, all the petty world governments will fold as the Orbital Mind Control Lasers find their targets. And normal tinfoil hats won't help, you'll need special tinfoil only available on Amazon. That's why Bezos is the richest CEO - he thinks these things through.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  25. Re:Now Downloading Monetization, Pls Wait For Toas by AlwinBarni · · Score: 1

    Great, more bandwidth for my fridge. And once they run out of repositioning fuel there'll be 75 more pieces of space junk in orbit.

    People partially have already commented, just as anonymous so here is my summary:

    1. Satellites: nowadays technology allows for LEO (low Earth orbit) deployment of clusters of communication satellites, where there is still some drag from air molecules, which results in orbit decay, e.g. ISS has to boost its orbit regularly (also such orbits allow for low latency communication), additionally nowadays satellites are required to have either deorbiting capability or moving to so called "graveyard" orbits, where, even when decommissioned do not pose thread to other space assets.

    2. Internet for everybody: maybe you live in an urban area, so having high bandwidth internet is nothing special, but there are rural places or undeveloped countries, where building infrastructure for high bandwidth internet is too expensive and many people do not have it, so having a global internet access is not only good for people, who do not have it, but also for humanity as a whole in case of any disasters or for automatic science data collectors. An example: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 - not only we would've known where, but maybe even people could've been saved. Another example (less drastic) is Event Horizon Telescope, people take airplanes to carry TBs of data on hard-drives - in this case a proper bandwidth would be required.

  26. Re:Now Downloading Monetization, Pls Wait For Toas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From 2017, several first-generation Iridium satellites have been deliberately de-orbited after being replaced by operational Iridium NEXT satellites

    The first generation iridium satellites were put to serve satellite phones, at a huge expense. But Satellite phones quickly became obsolete when the cell phone market took off. Millions were spent on those first generation satellites with virtually no investment return.I myself watched my iridium stock follow the rabbit hole until it wasn't even worth the fees to sell it.

    Now we have iridium 2.0 with more "cloud" and "IOT". I predict that by the time they 'develop' their new satellite system and spend millions launching to orbit their whole business model is going to collapse to the next wave of disruptive technology.

  27. Sweet! by argStyopa · · Score: 0

    So people who need things like clean water or basic medical care can *finally* log in and see Kim Kardashian's new outfit made entirely of money?*

    *actual article in the news today: http://www.tmz.com/2018/09/28/...

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think more importantly, people will *finally* be able to log in and buy everything they need from amazon.

  28. Re: Now Downloading Monetization, Pls Wait For Toa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Re: You have to re-aim satellite every time you move it.

    Wow, that is just stupid. You have no idea how Iridium works. Hint, it's not like that.

  29. Re: Now Downloading Monetization, Pls Wait For Toa by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Wow, that is just stupid. You have no idea how Iridium works. Hint, it's not like that.

    Wow, you are cowardly. I'm obviously talking about typical satellite internet systems and not Iridium there. Granted, I didn't make it clear, but it's equally clear that your parser is broken.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  30. High hopes in the 1990s ... by kbahey · · Score: 1

    When Iridium was launched in the 1990s, with backing from Bill Gates and others, it was a promising project: internet access almost anywhere on the planet.

    However, they required big hand sets with big antennas. But then GSM phones became ubiquitous where humans are concentrated (cities, towns, suburbs, ...etc.) and there was not much of a need for Iridium, apart from those who live, or work, or travel to, remote areas. Not much of a market.

    The company went bust, and this iteration is an attempt to revive it.

    The requirement for custom handsets and/or modems is still there.
    How much will these cost?
    How much would a monthly data plan cost?
    Are the speeds adequate for today's bloated web sites?

    It may remain as a niche business, for business (not consumers), much like Thuraya.

    We will see ...

    1. Re:High hopes in the 1990s ... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      The problem was that Iridium was to use a system that costs 200M / launch back then and only took up a couple of sats / launch. As such, it was something like 20 launches to put up their system.
      IOW, setting up Iridium was HORRIBLY expensive.
      Now, Iridum just did the second version with 50M / launch and 10 sats / launch, So for less than 4 launches from before, they did this entire new network.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:High hopes in the 1990s ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, no, Iridium was designed to do phone calls, even today Iridium offers slow than dialup data rates.

  31. Zero control over security? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    So what they're saying is that aside from physically hacking so-called 'IoT' devices to prevent them from connecting in this way, you'll have precisely zero positive ability to actually control the transceivers? Great. That means 'IoT' devices will be even less secure than ever before. Botnet owners will be thrilled.

  32. lol. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    So many sat connections coming to the planet.
    I think that the net neutrality issue is about to go away.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:lol. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So many sat connections coming to the planet. [...]

      Here in Amurica, a 'sat connection' is where a person's ass meets the BarcaLounger.

  33. It's time to break up Amazon by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    I keep seeing new things that Amazon is getting involved in, and its getting ridiculous.
    Whats next?

    It is long past time to break up Amazon.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  34. Re: Now Downloading Monetization, Pls Wait For Toa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, that is just stupid. You have no idea how Iridium works. Hint, it's not like that.

    Wow, you are cowardly. I'm obviously talking about typical satellite internet systems and not Iridium there. Granted, I didn't make it clear, but it's equally clear that your parser is broken.

    Psst... the article and thread is about Iridium. Why would you be talking about ...oh, yeah... of course... to derail real discussion.

  35. But isn't Amazon evil? by FlamingGuts · · Score: 1

    Wait you guys, I thought Amazon has too much money!? Surely you won't support a project of theirs that they spent said money on... right?

  36. Wtf slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously... no SKYNET tag?!? You guys are slipping.

  37. Re:Now Downloading Monetization, Pls Wait For Toas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about that one, you know the iridium satellite that got in a head-on with one of russias finest creating a huge cloud of debris in the worst satellite collision to date?
    Please don’t forget that