Slashdot Mirror


At a Workshop Last Week, a CERN Scientist Said 'Physics Was Invented and Built by Men -- Not By Invitation'; CERN Has Suspended the Scientist (bbc.com)

New submitter ilguido writes: At a workshop organized by CERN, Prof Alessandro Strumia of Pisa University said that "physics was invented and built by men, it's not by invitation", BBC reported Monday. Strumia's presentation [Google Drive link] that supports the idea that "physics is not sexist against women[...], however the truth does not matter, because it is part of a political battle coming from outside" has already received a lot of criticism, with one female physicist defining Strumia's analysis as "simplistic, drawing on ideas that had long been discredited." In a statement on Sunday, CERN said, "It is unfortunate that one of the 38 presentations, by a scientist from one of the collaborating universities, risks overshadowing the important message and achievements of the event. CERN, like many members of the community, considers that the presentation, with its attacks on individuals, was unacceptable in any professional context and was contrary to the CERN Code of Conduct. It, therefore, decided to remove the slides from the online repository." On Monday, CERN said it has suspended the scientist from any activity at CERN with immediate effect, pending investigation into last week's event.

41 of 606 comments (clear)

  1. Our species needs to evolve by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I really wish I'd live long enough to see our species evolve past all the tendency to violence, racism, sexism, bigotry, wilful ignorance, superstitious nonsense, and all the other stupid crap that we, as a species, seem to be infected with, but as-is I'm not even so sure the human species will manage to survive to see the year 2100, when even the greatest minds among us aren't immune to all the above.

    1. Re:Our species needs to evolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The greatest minds were never immune. Read up on the biographies of Newton, Tesla, etc. Humans have always been flawed. That was the single greatest achievement of the Scientific Method: making progress in the great game in spite of its flawed players.

    2. Re:Our species needs to evolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Instead you'd rather these great minds ignore the truth and bow down to political correctness and pretend that everything that is not true really is? All in the name of making marginalized people feel better about themselves... That is absurd.

    3. Re: Our species needs to evolve by Mr307 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unless i'm missing some irony here:

      False dichotomy, we can all simultaneously reject the grossly absurdly evil machinations of post modern identity politics and one of is main weapons political correctness, and reject all those things you mentioned.

      No one would be happier because one of the first of many casualties of that way of thinking is the loss of free will.

    4. Re:Our species needs to evolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I really wish I'd live long enough to see our species evolve past all the tendency to violence, racism, sexism, bigotry, wilful ignorance, superstitious nonsense, and all the other stupid crap that we, as a species, seem to be infected with

      I agree, but how do you get them to stop voting for people like Hillary Clinton, Justin Trudeau, Angela Merkel, and Emmanuel Macron who insist on perpetuating and accentuating racism and sexism?

    5. Re: Our species needs to evolve by sycodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yep.

      Maybe the folks at CERN should have done the Scientific thing and refuted his paper using facts.
      The statement, "physics is not sexist against women[...], however the truth does not matter, because it is part of a political battle coming from outside" shouldn't be that hard to refute, no? Then they make a presentation the next time and shame that guy into a career at Starbucks.

      But they didn't that, did they. All they did was spout platitudes designed to placate the SJW crowd.

       

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    6. Re:Our species needs to evolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A woman I know recently applied to a PhD position. She already had a master's in the topic, from a school pretty strong in the subject area, doing some pretty difficult work, plus a fair amount of science communication & outreach on the side, and was looking to go further. She got rejected from a well funded position (with several openings), and later, she made the mistake of looking at the student roster to see who had gotten in. All male, seemingly straight out of undergrad, none of whom had a master's. She was kind of pissed, because while she couldn't prove that was a result of sexism, it sure looks like it, you know? And that's ridiculous, we shouldn't be dismissing anyone based on their sex, but this is definitely happening in science and academia.

      Funny thing though, while that story is true, I lied about the sexes. I swapped them. Still feel the same way?

      I have a hard time dismissing claims that there is political bias against men when I can see it happen. And before some moron accuses me of being sexist, I'm not saying that there aren't plenty of very competent female scientists out there, there are. And I'm not saying that there isn't real sexism against women in science, there is, I've seen it, and anyone who denies that or covers for it is part of the problem. That doesn't change the fact that screwing over men is also happening, and that it is not the way to go about fixing anything.

    7. Re: Our species needs to evolve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Maybe physicists are not really qualified to judge the quality of this contribution by a physicist to Gender Studies and the guy who presented the talk should have presented it at a Gender Studies or sociology conference instead? It's really mysterious why some people from the STEM fields believe they can contribute something meaningful to a completely different field after having played around with a few data sources and/or having briefly googled the basics of a completely different subject matter, but it's not the first time I've seen it. Sure, a good math background helps you with many things but a little bit more care is still needed. Also, please do not give unsolicited Gender Studies talks at physics workshops. That should be a no-brainer, shouldn't it?

    8. Re: Our species needs to evolve by nwaack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But they didn't that, did they. All they did was spout platitudes designed to placate the SJW crowd.

      In the current uber-politically-correct world, placating the SJW crowd is pretty much the only thing that matters anymore. Don't do that and you are automatically a racist, sexist, xenophobe, and other sassy words that end in "ist" and "phobe."

    9. Re: Our species needs to evolve by Miser · · Score: 3, Insightful

      100% this.

      If you're a scientist, instead of shutting someone up to mollify the SJW's, bust his ass up with FACTS.

      Then, it's a win-win, double smackdown for Strumia if he is proven wrong, again, with FACTS.

    10. Re: Our species needs to evolve by shilly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lack of insight coupled with shamelessness is the defining characteristic of the bitter modern misogynist.

    11. Re: Our species needs to evolve by OYAHHH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personally I don't think you or I are in any position to evaluate his claims of reverse bias in hiring. Unless we knew ALL of the details he account might be 100 percent accurate. Or perhaps not.

      --
      Caution: Contents under pressure
    12. Re: Our species needs to evolve by shilly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sigh.

      1. This wasn't the US.
      2. The 1st amendment is about not granting the government power to restrict your speech. It doesn't promise you that you can say any shit you like without fear of being fired by your employer, shunned by your neighbours, divorced by your spouse, disowned by your kids, not published by a newspaper or social media platform or book publisher, sued by your business partners, turned away by your customers, etc et bloody cetera.

      When did rightwingers become such fucking whiners? Grow up and own your words and the consequences that flow from saying them. Christ knows, the rest of us have had to.

  2. Sorry, I cannot do a presentation by bobstreo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's better to just keep your mouth shut sometimes, even if your teeth grind, and your lips go blue, and you get cobwebs in your mouth.

  3. Re: And just like that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A physicist just wanting to do physics without politics injected.... imagine that.

  4. Follow the Scientific Method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    one female physicist defining Strumia's analysis as "simplistic, drawing on ideas that had long been discredited."

    If it really has been discredited, then quote the research that discredits it. Strumia has provided evidence to support his claims, and evidence is needed to dismiss those claims.

    1. Re:Follow the Scientific Method by jeff4747 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If it really has been discredited, then quote the research that discredits it

      If geocentrism really has been discredited, then quote the research that discredits it!

      Sometimes, the results of the "research" is pretty overwhelming, and quoting it at length over and over again for each layperson who stumbles by is not an effective use of time.

      For example, it's not been that long since women could actually attend a university and get a degree in physics. Both literally and culturally. And there's a host of other barriers. But going over this again and again for people who will respond with "NUH UH!!!" is just a waste of time.

    2. Re:Follow the Scientific Method by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      She was asked for a quote, not a dissertation. There are decades of papers and studies in this area if you want to read up about it.

      This is James Damore all over again. The studies cited don't say what he thinks they say. The classic example is this one, which a naive reader might conclude proves that there is a difference between men and women that could account for the imbalance in STEM... Except that the differences are far too small to draw that conclusion.

      This is called the "incoherence problem", where otherwise smart people bring together a bunch of overlapping data and reach unwarranted conclusions by building it into a nonsensical framework.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  5. Correct by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    physics is not sexist against women

    This is true. Physics has no opinion on the matter. Many physicists however are definitely sexist against women. Not all but enough to be a real problem.

    1. Re:Correct by WaffleMonster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many physicists however are definitely sexist against women. Not all but enough to be a real problem.

      Many physicists however are definitely against Italians. Not all but enough to be a real problem.

      Stating opinion without proffering evidence for your position or even bothering to characterize it in an objectively unambiguous manner can be quite a bit of fun.

  6. I admit I'm curious by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One of the slides amounted to: "No one is seeking gender equality in jobs that get you killed." Is that true? I suspect the military and law enforcement may be an exceptions since there's a lot of social prestige, but I don't hate myself enough to read jezebel.

    1. Re:I admit I'm curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't even need to look at jobs that get you killed. No one is seeking gender equality in jobs that women dominate.

      Women dominate teaching below the college level, veterinarian jobs, and nursing, just to name a few. Yet there are no efforts to increase the number of men in those fields. You also never see a push for more women construction workers or farm workers or garbage collectors. It's only well-paying jobs where a high percentage of men is a problem. Low paying jobs? No one cares. Jobs where women dominate? No one cares.

      There's a real war on men from the left these days, as the whole "#MeToo" movement and their opposition to Kavanaugh prove.

    2. Re:I admit I'm curious by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When is the last time you have heard of a protest that women are just as good at picking up garbage or mining coal as men. Or that a woman can dig a ditch just as well as a man? Where are the complaints that women are just as good at cleaning out sewers as men?

      There may well be discrimination in those fields, and there may be individual women who fave a just complaint about it, but if so, they aren't getting a lot of support from other feminists.

  7. good riddance. by nimbius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Im sure ill get modded down for this, but im actually glad someone called this guy out and suspended him. Way too many conferences already have one guy, or girl, who decides to bring a pot of shit to stir instead of any actual contribution to the conference. When they leave, they immediately claim their talk to be a success because "controversy = i must be right."

    Alessandro Strumia showed up to a CERN conference with an axe to grind. He didnt show up to the workgroup with a new model for detecting leptons, a new theory of strong force interaction, or anything else that would have been legitimately controversial. Alessandro Strumia showed up to shitpost about gender. CERN is not 4chan. Come back when you want to solve real problems.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:good riddance. by gosand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Way too many conferences already have one guy, or girl, who decides to bring a pot of shit to stir instead of any actual contribution to the conference.

      Disagreeing with the status quo is not "bring[ing] a pot of shit to stir". Strumia provided evidence to support his claims. If he is wrong, then provide evidence that he is wrong.

      Evidence huh? Did you actually read his presentation? Seriously, there is a link to it right there in the summary. Go through the whole thing. Evidence indeed.
      If I didn't know it came from a professor (with an obvious axe to grind) I would have guessed it was done by a 9th grader. (with an axe to grind)

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    2. Re:good riddance. by cyberchondriac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps you missed the part that one of the official subjects of the conference was gender in the field. It was relevant to the discussion. See AC's post about 4 or 5 below with the part in bold.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    3. Re:good riddance. by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is there a conference about gender in CERN? Did CERN open a sociology branch?

      Only two things can happen in such a conference. Either it turns into a politically correct echo chamber with nothing worthwhile coming out of it. Or it turns into a massive controversy that is equally unproductive. Do you ask sociologists to do quantum physics? No, because if you do, all you are going to get are time travelling cats or whatever bullshit people tend to think of when quantum physics is mentioned. So why would you ask particle physicists to do a conference about gender roles in society?

      Physicists are free to discuss gender between themselves, and sociologists are free to talk about quantum physics, but to organize a conference in a reputable scientific institution, one would expect experts in their fields.

    4. Re:good riddance. by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If people are allowed to submit this garbage (see below), then I don't see any reason to censor the response (to the garbage)

      - E=mc^2 is a sexist equation. "Because it privileges the speed of light over other speeds that are vitally necessary to us. What seems to me to indicate the possible Sexed nature of the equation is not directly its uses by nuclear weapons, rather it is having privileged what goes the fastest."

      Also: "The privileging of solid over fluid mechanics, and indeed the inability of science to deal with turbulent flow at all, we attribute to the association of fluidity with femininity. Whereas men have sex organs that protrude and become rigid, women have openings that leak menstrual blood and vaginal fluids.... From this perspective it is no wonder that science has not been able to arrive at a successful model for turbulence. The problem of turbulent flow cannot be solved because the conceptions of fluids (and of women) have been formulated so as necessarily to leave unarticulated remainders"

      The guy was merely saying THIS stuff is wholly wrong and inaccurate.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  8. Re:And just like that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think only the one slide got him fired. Maybe the way he presented as well, I haven't seen that. The quote about physics' invention is very easy to misread, I can't blame CERN for reacting to that slide. Everything else... he's just attempting to analyze the issue. Nothing wrong with that.

  9. He talked about the taboo subject, gender. by BrookHarty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looking at the pdf presentation in the OP's link, he went somewhere that some people do not want to be discussed, Gender differences and gender preferences.

    Instead of refuting his argument, it's easier to call him a sexist bigot and just discredit him that way.

    Appears he's making the statement, historically men did dominate the field, but didn't primarily exclude women, and when women started joining they won Nobels. But many fields of study appears to have gender differences, and that sexism wasn't the cause, but gender preference.

    He states his theory, cultural Marxism re-writing history to promote oppression as the reason women did not contribute. Along the same lines of re-shaping history to push the narative that exploration and advancements were performed by men who raped, murdered, stole land and murdered indigenous people.

  10. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  11. Re:And just like that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    His being a dumb ass got him fired. Why do idiots like this feel entitled to bring up their backwards politics at non-political events?

    If I'm working a job and presenting for my company and I go off on a rant about something political guess what will happen to me?

    If you guess I probably will get fired you win. I'm tired of all these over privileged cry babies feeling like they have a right to throw out their politics on company time.

  12. Re:Real problem by WaffleMonster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not opinion and the facts are not hard to find for anyone who can be bothered to look for even 20 seconds on Google. Sexism is quite real and it is distressingly common in the field of physics and many other branches of science. It's ironic that you ask for evidence of sexism in an article about a guy who was fired because he (apparently) exhibited sexism publicly. If that isn't evidence I'm not quite sure you understand the meaning of the term.

    His presentation provided data to support his position. In contrast you are offering nothing.

    You didn't even bother to read his presentation. Had you have bothered to do so you would have noticed the sentence cited in the headline occurs under the heading "discrimination against women".

    BTW the very next slide includes the heading "discrimination against men".

  13. No argument for the wrong theory allowed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The idiot mentioned it in his own presentation: Women are overrepresented in the CERN administration. Why did he think he could give a scientific argument against the feminist agenda without getting reprimanded?

  14. The Overton Window Pushback by DatbeDank · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The more and more this small but loud group keeps pushing this nonsense, the sooner there will be a massive pushback against them and this agenda. Which is a shame because the snapback AWLAYS will undo what was previously accomplished.

    What these idiots fail to realize is that it is OK to stop with progressive ideas once you reach a certain point. The people who used to push equality of the sexes have now transitioned into female subjugation of men at the expense of everything else. As someone who totally signed on for equality, this is NOT ok.

    If you are a physicist, board member etc, were placed into that position by merit, and happen to be a woman good for you!

    We should be at a point in history where we don't look at sex as a determining factor but ignore it in favor of a list of successful options.

    But no, we aren't and can't focus on more important things because these loud nitwits have a hammer and see everything as a nail.

  15. Re:And just like that... by Etcetera · · Score: 5, Insightful

    His being a dumb ass got him fired. Why do idiots like this feel entitled to bring up their backwards politics at non-political events?

    If I'm working a job and presenting for my company and I go off on a rant about something political guess what will happen to me?

    If you guess I probably will get fired you win. I'm tired of all these over privileged cry babies feeling like they have a right to throw out their politics on company time.

    It's worth pointing out that the opposite would almost certainly not be the case though. If he had done a presentation on "Gender Diversity in Physics" that reached the opposite conclusions, the complaints wouldn't be made. And if you haven't noticed, the trend by the SJW crowd is to insert politics at ALL events, because "there is no such thing as a non-political event", and "being able to ignore politics is a white male privilege" and if you disagree, you're a bigot.

    I'd be all for keeping these events non-political. Too bad one side has already decided that bridge must be crossed.

  16. Re:Mme Curie ? by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A single instance does not make a statistic. The great women on STEM do exist, but they are few. Far too few for this to be a measurement error.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  17. Re:Real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Have you accounted for selection bias? By limiting your sample to women who have made it to the PhD level, you are potentially omitting women who did not progress as far because of gender discrimination. Some women are better than others at working in an environment with a pervasive "boys' club" mentality and thus may not see gender discrimination as an issue because they are less affected by it. Discrimination is a very difficult thing to quantify, so you can get very different results depending on who you ask, what you ask, and how you ask.

  18. Last 10 years if politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Have been about SJW feelings, outrage and political correctness.

    Who cares about facts - someone will just tell you you're a Nazi for disagreeing with something crazy

  19. Re:So Sad by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You don't get a invitation in the mail. You join by achievement, by accomplishment. All this gender talk is a distraction from real physics.

    Well, no. You join by recognition of achievement, which came more readily for men than for women throughout most of history.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. Ever stopped to wonder why? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, he's not wrong. Almost all the biggest minds in physics and math were men

    True but have you ever stopped to wonder why? This is NOT evidence that men are better at physics but evidence of the extremely sexist society which has existed for centuries. Yes, things are a lot better now than they used to be but you have to be a monumental idiot to not realize that sexism in the past was directly responsible for the lack of women in physics or indeed any science.

    This is what should have been pointed out to him by someone in the audience. This is the way that you fix idiotic thinking. If you scare them into never expressing their views you will never have the opportunity to correct them.