Slashdot Mirror


Former Students Say Steve Wozniak's $13,200 Coding Bootcamp Is 'Broken' and Sometimes Links To Wikipedia (9to5mac.com)

Last year, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak announced a coding program called Woz U that's designed with the goal of offering an affordable education. "Our goal is to educate and train people in employable digital skills without putting them into years of debt," Wozniak said last fall. "People often are afraid to choose a technology-based career because they think they can't do it. I know they can, and I want to show them how."

Now that a round of students have been through the 33-week program, a number of problems have appeared. Former student, Bill Duerr, called the program "broken," and that "lots of times there's just hyperlinks to Microsoft documents, to Wikipedia." 9to5Mac reports: "Duerr said typos in course content were one of many problems. So-called 'live lectures' were pre-recorded and out of date, student mentors were unqualified, and at one point, one of his courses didn't even have an instructor," reports CBS. CBS heard from over 24 current and former students and employees that reiterated Duerr's experiences. Instead of a quality program, Duerr said Woz U was comparable to an ultra expensive e-book: "'I feel like this is a $13,000 e-book,' Duerr said. While it was supposed to be a program written by one of the greatest tech minds of all time, 'it's broken, it's not working in places, lots of times there's just hyperlinks to Microsoft documents, to Wikipedia,' he said."

A former Woz U enrollment counselor said that at times he had to do things that didn't feel right: "Asked whether he regrets working for Woz U, Mionske said, 'I regret in the aspect to where they're spending this money for, it's like rolling the dice. [...] But on the reverse side, I have to support my family.'"
According to Business Insider, Steve Wozniak said that he's "not involved" in the "operational aspects" of Woz U and doesn't know anything about the report this morning.

135 comments

  1. "I know nothing!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I just cash the checks." - Woz

    1. Re: "I know nothing!" by Retard++Pusher · · Score: 0

      The whole situation looked queer when I spotted a worn-out 8 inch floppy being used as a chew toy. That was the moment that I ran out the door in panic and got back in the car to find a tamer Berkeley party.

    2. Re: "I know nothing!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's see, half the shit doesn't work, a quarter of it is cribbed, most of the documentation is just links to online docs, and the people in charge can't be bothered to be directly involved and just cash their paychecks.

      Actually that perfectly describes how programming works in the real world.

    3. Re: "I know nothing!" by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      You're supposed to flee from the #metoo fad, not toward it. Anything for publicity so people will look up your wikipedia entry figure out who you are, eh, Woz?

      Unlike you, who HAS no Wikipedia entry, right?

  2. Classic problem with computer science educators... by skam240 · · Score: 2

    A classic problem with computer science educators. If you're good in your field your earning vastly less money teaching it than working it. Hopefully as the field matures more we get more semi-retirees teaching more but until then this will be a huge problem until we raise teacher's wages.

    I remember my first CS-ish teachers in high school in the 90's. They meant well but didn't have a fucking clue.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  3. I just rented out my name by registrations_suck · · Score: 1, Funny

    I just rented out my name...not my fault.... I am not even there....where is mommy?

    Please.

    1. Re:I just rented out my name by skam240 · · Score: 1

      She's over at my place and judging by slashdot number I'm your dad.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    2. Re:I just rented out my name by Xenx · · Score: 1

      While I wouldn't give him a complete out, I wouldn't blame him for this problem. If this had been an ongoing issue, or if he opts to do nothing about this problem, then I would assign more blame to him.

    3. Re:I just rented out my name by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Yeah. If Woz wants a favorable legacy he had better get his shit together on this. In reality though, I would think a split/internship program would be more effective to give people more effective coding experience.

      But I am not a coder...

    4. Re: I just rented out my name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But I am not a coder..."

      That's probably why you don't realize "coder" is a pejorative term. Kinda like calling an accountant a "spreadsheet monkey".

      The polite terms are "programmer" or "developer".

    5. Re: I just rented out my name by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Or lately "Software Engineer" which I think is insulting to actual engineers.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    6. Re: I just rented out my name by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

  4. Don't name a U after yourself, that's obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Steve Wozniak said that he's "not involved" in the "operational aspects" of Woz U and doesn't know anything about the report this morning." - This is not the profile comparison he wants to be cutting at this stage of his life.

  5. Expert practitioners vs. Expert educators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To put it bluntly there is no correlation between subject matter expertise and teaching expertise. Clearly, whoever designed that programme has little or no knowledge about learning and teaching theory and practice, and not even as much experience as a university adjunct/sessional tutor.

    1. Re:Expert practitioners vs. Expert educators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No correlation between subject matter expertise and teaching expertise? This relation ship goes both ways. I would much rather have an individual that is an expert in their field (but limited teaching experience) teaching me an advanced topic such as quantum mechanics, than some yayhoo that has a D.Ed. (but never taken physics) teaching me quantum mechanics. There is a correlation between subject matter expertise and teaching expertise. Obviously being an expert/good at one does not make you an expert/good at the other.

    2. Re:Expert practitioners vs. Expert educators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No correlation between subject matter expertise and teaching expertise? This relationship goes both ways. For highly technical subjects I would rather have an individual that is an expert in their field (but limited teaching experience) teach me mathematics or physics, than a yayhoo with a D.Ed. who has never taken either teaching me the same subjects. Obviously being an expert in subject matter does not make you an expert in teaching, and vice versa, but to parrot this old trope is misleading and simply not true.

    3. Re:Expert practitioners vs. Expert educators by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 2

      I think the AC is saying that experts often, but not always, make lousy teachers. BTW, someone with an M.Ed or D.Ed isn't necessarily a good teacher either. It just means they spent some years studying teaching, not actually doing it and learning how to do it themselves, i.e. M.Eds & D.Eds are theoretical and not practice based. A description of 3 (out of 16) of the characteristics of good teachers follows:

      However, this is only part of the story; there’s another one! John Hattie (2003) analysed the difference between expert and ‘ordinary’ teachers. He determined that they differ in 16 ways and there are three that really distinguish them if it comes to learning effectiveness. He found that experts:

      • - set challenging goals for students and give them difficult tasks to challenge them;
      • - have a deep conceptual knowledge of the learning content, didactics, and how people learn. As a consequence, their knowledge is better organised and they’re better able to transfer and explain the connections between new content and students’ pre knowledge. They’re also better at connecting learning content with other topics in the curriculum.
      • - are better at monitoring problems that students have and give them more relevant and useful feedback.

      Quoted from: https://3starlearningexperienc...

      So yes, deep subject matter knowledge is necessary but not sufficient. Having tutors who are experts in their subject matter but not good teachers, as is common in higher education where the only recognised qualifications are Masters and Doctorates, means that only a small minority of students can learn well in that environment. Prestigious universities compensate for this through selective admission. In other words, only accepting students who are likely to succeed without expert tutoring. MOOCs deal with this by accepting a 95% failure rate (and those students who succeed on MOOCs are almost always already highly qualified).

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  6. Woz is one of my heros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know now Woz, do the right thing

    1. Re:Woz is one of my heros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Sure the Apple 1 and Apple ][ (and disk OS and disk drive) were great in their time, but 40 years later name another he worked on.

      Because there isn't one. There is really nothing. So I am not surprised how this turned out at all.

    2. Re: Woz is one of my heros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple II apparently has such low latency it is unmatched even today.

    3. Re:Woz is one of my heros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know of many projects the Woz worked on, his ability to rework circuits to use 20% less chips is legendary.

      There is a reason the Apple 1 looked like an Atari video game board.

      One of the most interesting things the Woz did that stunned everybody is the way his floppy disk drive worked.

      When I first got mine I could not believe what I was looking at, the controller card only had a few msi ttl chips on it and the disk drive electronic only had a couple small chips that were mainly analog?!? how could this possibly work?

      The Woz did it all in software

    4. Re:Woz is one of my heros by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 2

      Why? Sure the Apple 1 and Apple ][ (and disk OS and disk drive) were great in their time, but 40 years later name another he worked on.

      Because there isn't one. There is really nothing. So I am not surprised how this turned out at all.

      Now, please list YOUR accomplishments that will be remembered 40 years on.

      I'll wait...

    5. Re:Woz is one of my heros by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Apple ][ .. disk OS were great in their time,

      Uh, Apple 2 fan here.

      DOS 3.2 and DOS 3.3 *sucked* due to its dumb File System design. Who the fuck stores Meta-Data IN the file itself??? (Binary files had the first 4 bytes in the file reserved for DOS: load address, file length). Most of DOS 3.x wasn't even written by Apple -- it was contracted out -- sans the disk nibble writing/reading code. Notice how ProDOS stores the load address and file length in the directory entry itself. The ProDOS name itself shows what Apple though of DOS 3.x: Amateur DOS.

      Even with the dumb design of mixing meta-data with file data Pronto-DOS and other "Fast DOSes", such as Diverse-DOS, RolandDOS, etc. showed how much "Buffer Bloat" there was in DOS.

      > name another he worked on.

      And _you_ have accomplished what again?

      Why does he need a "modern" accomplishment? Any ONE of Woz's accomplishments -- Apple I, Apple ][, the disk drive -- outshine pretty anyone will ever accomplish. Woz helped usher in the computer age for everyone.

      This constant "need to prove oneself" accomplished what again???

      That said, Woz should take some responsibility for a school using his fame / name.

    6. Re:Woz is one of my heros by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 3, Informative

      I know of many projects the Woz worked on, his ability to rework circuits to use 20% less chips is legendary.

      There is a reason the Apple 1 looked like an Atari video game board.

      One of the most interesting things the Woz did that stunned everybody is the way his floppy disk drive worked.

      When I first got mine I could not believe what I was looking at, the controller card only had a few msi ttl chips on it and the disk drive electronic only had a couple small chips that were mainly analog?!? how could this possibly work?

      The Woz did it all in software

      Yep.

      And he used to tell the story about how, one late night before a big computer show where the Disk ][ was introduced, he and Randy Wigginton were able to change ONE BYTE in the Controller's State Machine PROM and reduce their raw error-rate from 1 X 10^9 to 1X 10^12.

      For those who don't remember, this is how the typical Shugart SA400 controller looked in 1978:

      http://www.s100computers.com/G...

      Now, compare that with the Disk ][ controller:

      http://i2.wp.com/www.appleresc...

      Amazing that they do EXACTLY the same thing, isn't it?

  7. Woz University, meet Trump University by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sad, so sad.

    1. Re:Woz University, meet Trump University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's the Woz University calling the Trump University black!

    2. Re:Woz University, meet Trump University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. so true.

    3. Re:Woz University, meet Trump University by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      Steve Wozniak said that he's "not involved" in the "operational aspects" of Woz U and doesn't know anything about the report this morning.

      What is he? A child or a teenage celebrity strapped for cash?

      He can't just lend his name to a supposed school and then not keep tabs on how it's doing and how it's doing it.

      At the very least, he needs to say he's looking into the allegations.

    4. Re:Woz University, meet Trump University by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Hey, back off. At least he's not selling steaks. Yet.

    5. Re:Woz University, meet Trump University by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Sad, so sad.

      What's funny is that most can only see how one angle of that is funny, lol

    6. Re:Woz University, meet Trump University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really. It sounds like Woz sold his name to some shitty org to get free money while disclaiming all responsibility. Just like Trump did. The one using Trump's name was a flat-out scam, while this one is just junk.

    7. Re:Woz University, meet Trump University by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Worryingly this is the same excuse Trump used for Trump University being a scam. Even if it's true it's not any better than having been involved at every step.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  8. Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by Ashthon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't understand why anyone would pay that sort of money when you can buy a $50 book and learn from that. Not only is it much cheaper, but the ability to learn on your own is an essential skill for a programmer since programming requires continuous learning in order to keep your skills up to date. If you're unable to study yourself, and need information spoon fed to you, it's probably not the career for you.

    Besides, you don't learn to program in a boot camp. All you're going to learn is the basic language syntax and features, which you can learn easily yourself. To develop actual programming skills you need to write software. After writing an application you'll likely find there were many things that could have been done better and you'll be able to use those lessons in your next application, thus improving your skills.

    Programming boot camps are a con aimed at people who aren't actually interested in programming but who have seen the high salaries you can get as a programmer. Real programmers more than likely learned to program around age 13, and they did it because it interested them, not for the money.

    1. Re:Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Getting professionally critiqued on your code could have value. I would think a 12-hour course on syntax, resources, and pitfalls for a language could be interesting though. One per language, maybe you have beginner levels at 12 hours and difference levels that are only 3 hours or something.

      But experience doing is 90% of the game usually. Blind leading the dumb on self-study of new concepts is ineffective.

    2. Re:Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not everyone can learn from reading a book, and sometimes having a place to go, or even just a webcast to watch, helps with the motivation to stick with it. For most people, learning from a book really only works if you have a certain base knowledge. If I pick up a book on Excel VBA programming, and I don't even know what a spreadsheet is, I'm going to have one hell of a time trying to learn anything, but if I already have a pretty good understanding of spreadsheets and programming in general, a book on Excel VBA will probably be quite useful.

      As someone who reads /. you are probably above average when it comes to technical savvy. Picture some of your relatives who always ask you to fix their computer trying to learn how to code using only a book. Those are the people these programs are generally targeting.

    3. Re:Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by commodore64_love · · Score: 3

      > you can buy a $50 book and learn from that.

      That's how I learned VHDL and Verilog (though it actually cost $100). One problem is the lack of degree for those using this approach. HR won't look at your resume unless you have that "college sheepskin" to prove qualification.

      - And even if you do have a degree, they won't give you the time of day if it's the "wrong" degree. I have an EE, tried dozens of times for a programming job in C++, but my resume never got past HR. (Some even said, "Sorry no, but we have some EE openings we could put you in.") It's kinda like typecasting.

      The "risk" of putting an EE in a Software engineer job is too great, so the HR people simply avoid the risk.

      HR is risk averse.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    4. Re: Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of the worst code I have ever seen was written by EEs. Seriously.

      The only worse code was written by physics PhDs.

      Not sure where biologists' code quality fits in, it never works so it's not too dangerous.

    5. Re: Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The absolute worst code I've see was written by a programmer.

      So what's your point?

    6. Re:Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Horses for courses." Some people can learn on their own, others need help to get kickstarted. Personally I hated classes at school, they never went fast enough for me and I got bored at the pace of the materials. I loved talking with teachers out of hours after school, they were so passionate and I was hacking games to rip protections for fun when I was in school in the 80s and they loved hearing how I did it ( and it got their kids free games! ) while I learned from them about some of the more interesting tech work they'd done before they became teachers. In class though I was just bored as everyone else appeared to be there just 'cos their parents said they had to learn computers and consequently I left school at 16 and went straight into work with next to no qualifications. I had to learn all my skills on my own from books and later on videos. I've found it's good as you learn what you need for a task but on the downside you never get exposed to more esosteric sideline related material that fleshes out the knowledge, that can leave your projects a little flat on the creative front sometimes. I wish I had a proper degree or college education, I'd have the structure you need to approach things consistently and I'd have more job opportunities available. I'll never be a professional dev, I've been in ops jobs all my life and now devops but I count myself lucky I've managed a career in computer tech just being self taught.

    7. Re: Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am an EE and I will admit, engineers write terrible code in general.

    8. Re: Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      EEs write code like AND logic gates.

      10000 lines of code per function with
      30 indentations of IFs. Elses.

      Cant even factor out 3 lines being repeated 100 times into a function.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    9. Re:Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're the same idiots that buy Apples instead of something closer to reality.

    10. Re: Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      The highest quality code I've seen (at work) was written by an old whitebeard who had dropped out while studying English literature, then learned programming on the job back in the days of punchcards.

    11. Re: Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm interested in this! Can you please tell me what books you used? I'm a microcontroller buff who works in C, and would like to branch into EE more.
      Cheers.

    12. Re:Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by houghi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I wasd not even thinking that. I was thinking how sad it is that 13.000USD is "affordable" for education.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    13. Re:Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by monkeyxpress · · Score: 1

      Are you being serious? Literally half my EE class just does software development now. The other half are in management. I don't think I know anyone who is doing anything requiring a soldering iron any more.

      CS people are not magic. There are good ones around but plenty of extremely rubbish ones as well. The benefit of EE grads tends to be that the course is quite hard (at my university it was the hardest engineering discipline to get into) so it tends to self-select for slightly better candidates.

      My guess is that you are not padding out your CV correctly. C++ is really not that hard if you can do embedded C, but you do have to learn a bunch of BS terms for things that you will consider rather trivial. For example, almost all the useful design patterns are just things that you will already know inside out if you have developed any sort of decent sized application. But you still need to know the buzzword for them to get through the CV filter. Also you need to learn a bunch of basic algorithms (know your sorts and a use case for a binary tree). This is like CS bingo. EE has the same. I mean, when was the last time any EE ever derived the BER equation for amplitude modulation in the real world? But you do need to know some of this junk off the top of your head to make the box tickers happy.

      Also, why bother with C++? Most companies that advertise for 'C++' are really just using it as a code word for 'we want senior google level candidates' because it is a hard language to bluff your way through. I know people who got C++ jobs and never actually wrote code in C++. If you lack software experience outside of embedded, then pick up Python or JavaScript (you can learn those in a couple of weeks if you know C) and apply for some entry/mid level jobs in those languages. You'll likely find being an EE in those roles makes your application stand out from all the degree mill grads applying.

    14. Re: Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EEs write code like AND logic gates.

      10000 lines of code per function with
      30 indentations of IFs. Elses.

      Cant even factor out 3 lines being repeated 100 times into a function.

      Really? I'm not an EE but a mathematician who has the greatest respect for EEs from a decent school. I code (algorithm hack) enough to know most EEs are damn good logical thinkers/coders, way above most programmers holding a lot of "certifications" even if they may not be as facile with the buzzwords de jour.

    15. Re:Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by Njovich · · Score: 1

      A good course provides you great tutors to teach and answer your questions, guides you through excellent books at a certain pace, has team and lab excercises to learn, gives you networking opportunities and gives you a useful certificate that you qualify to the standards set by the institute. Also it provides you a setting that motivates you to put real work in. I guess Woz U is not a particularly good example of that.

    16. Re: Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EEs write code like AND logic gates.

      10000 lines of code per function with
      30 indentations of IFs. Elses.

      Cant even factor out 3 lines being repeated 100 times into a function.

      Tell me about it. I even had an EE try to tell me I was wrong for refactoring out that kind of stuff. He said I was creating "special cases" and writing the same code and if statements 100x was somehow better and more maintainable.

    17. Re:Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real programmers more than likely learned to program around age 13, and they did it because it interested them, not for the money.

      Even though it is true that real programmers won't do it because of money but your comment about age 13 is partially true especially in the past. Not everyone has the resources or could afford a computer. If you came from a very poor family, it is not as easy as you think to get the resources, let alone any situations from the family. Thus, the age is not that important at all in this case.

    18. Re:Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      So when you have a question, how do you ask it to a book? Read it? How did you get that question in the first place? Contact the author? Ya, right. Students learn faster if there is someone available to answer questions, no matter how naive the question.

    19. Re:Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You answered your own question there. The reason people go to boot camp is to get over that initial hurdle and get started. A book can work too, but it's often a lot easier to have someone show you the basics with a working system and then go from there on your own. Being able to ask fairly basic questions or have things that don't initially make sense to you clarified is very valuable.

      That's pretty much why school isn't just quietly reading books once reading itself is mastered.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re: Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      EEs write code like AND logic gates.

      10000 lines of code per function with
      30 indentations of IFs. Elses.

      Cant even factor out 3 lines being repeated 100 times into a function.

      Woz wrote/writes code like someone who is inside the logic. IOW, his code is SO efficient, that people STILL marvel in its many clever and byte-saving designs.

    21. Re:Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by wyattstorch516 · · Score: 1

      But how does that benefit Woz?

    22. Re: Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by commodore64_love · · Score: 2

      In the era of 4 kilobyte PCs, you had to be efficient. I still marvel at how classic Atari games fit in such a small space.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    23. Re: Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have the Internet, stack overflow has so many high quality answers to almost any fundamental question about any subject.

      If a student has a question or finds some oddity in their book they're better off researching and finding the answer from the Internet rather then relying on a course teacher.

      It's unreasonable to think that an author or single or group of teachers are able to compair to the Internet when it comes to explaining precisely what a student is curious about. Also answering complex questions doesn't scale to a group well at all.
      And as said before: it's a requered still for doing any work on IT.

    24. Re: Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      In the era of 4 kilobyte PCs, you had to be efficient. I still marvel at how classic Atari games fit in such a small space.

      So did they.

      I read an article about the tricks that the Atari 2600 game-devs. had to pull to make things fit in those (IIRC 2 kB) game cartridges. Things like using some "unimplemented" 6502 OpCodes that did cool stuff like Clear the Accumulator and simultaneously load the X-Reg. with a value, etc.

      You are right, though. Parsimonious software development is a largely-forgotten art-form...

      Here's a fascinating article about game Development for the Atari 2600. Yow!

      https://www.wired.com/2009/03/...

    25. Re: Why pay $13,000 when you can learn yourself? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Oh naive A/C, prove it; Solve Anti-gravity, by reading a book.

  9. Re:Classic problem with computer science educators by Potor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My CS teacher in 1985 was a math teacher who was into computers as a hobby, but into algorithms with a passion. One of my favourite classes ever, and it still influences me ...

  10. There's nothing wrong with the lectures, by Snufu · · Score: 1, Troll

    students are just holding them wrong.

    1. Re: There's nothing wrong with the lectures, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it mightve been woz that was holding Them wrong

      On so many levels

    2. Re:There's nothing wrong with the lectures, by quenda · · Score: 2

      students are just holding them wrong.

      Wrong Steve.

  11. Disgruntled or unhappy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No problem, take it to social media and watch the shit fly.

  12. Re:Classic problem with computer science educators by skam240 · · Score: 0, Troll

    We're literally talking about different decades though and it seems like you're not talking about a proper teacher on the subject. An enthusiast can be amazing but they can't be counted on for standard education.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  13. Re:Don't name a U after yourself, that's obvious n by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 0

    Why not? Going by trends, he could end up being the next President of the United States!

    (*rimshot*)

  14. Re:Classic problem with computer science educators by Potor · · Score: 1

    Did you read my post? We learned all about algorithms, which are pretty much platform or hardware agnostic. I still think that way. What a better education could one get?

  15. Re:Don't name a U after yourself, that's obvious n by quenda · · Score: 1

    he could end up being the next President of the United States!

    (*rimshot*)

    Thankyou for explaining the joke. It is much funnier now, with all that needless subtlety removed.

  16. the Trump tech u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least the cost I'd lower

  17. Re:Don't name a U after yourself, that's obvious n by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

    This is Slashdot. People are vilified for the oddest things. People with Trump Derangement are even worse than the ones in the past who had Obama Derangement. They're stupid and dangerous, so it's always best to play it safe.

  18. 13k for the piece of paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    13k for the piece of paper

    1. Re: 13k for the piece of paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until you hear about the $200,000 pieces of paper.

  19. Re:Classic problem with computer science educators by Potor · · Score: 1

    I really have no idea what you are talking about. Maybe we are talking past one another.

    If your point is trivial, i.e., one good teacher does not make all teachers good, well, then, I agree, and I did not offer my experience as a contradiction to the rule that you established above.

    But I also think there are some people who do things for the love the material, and not for material gain. Which is to say, economics does not destroy the possibility that some people end up as good teachers in fields that would pay better elsewise.

  20. Re:Classic problem with computer science educators by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    I don't see it. There are a lot of teachers and the only ones I have seen are ones under employed struggling to get more hours. On all levels I see an overabundance of teachers competing for jobs. You might be surprised just how much many people value having half your life off work while getting paid a full time salary.

    And I think you overvalue the hotshot wiz kids of silicon valley and their ability at teaching others. The last thing students need is someone who has never struggled with a programming concept in their life trying to teach them. And this is just the absolute opposite of my experience. I have gone to a university that attracted international talent to do research and shit. The only ones in the entire institution who had any idea how to teach anyone were TAs and this one teacher who was not a professor.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  21. Woz U or Wazoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've heard of paying out the Wazoo, and now people are paying out the Woz U?

  22. Woz U? Go Woz yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    'Nuff said.

  23. On the other hand, we know how to scale by raymorris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's true.

    It's also true that computer science and computer engineering people know how to scale things, through automation and other means. A very simple example is that a lot of courses in other fields still have quizzes and such grades by hand. Anyone with even half a clue about computer anything wouldn't generally do that. Open source software like Moodle provides very flexible quizzes which can adapt to the student. I'd rather watch a recorded lecture by one of the best in the field than a live lecture by just another guy.

    We CAN have high-quality education in this field, more efficiently, which means lower costs to students. The OMSCS at Georgia Tech looks promising, for example.

    We also have to remember that graduating school doesn't mean you stop learning. I study daily and I've been in the field professionally for 20 years. College should give us the background we need in order to build our knowledge in different areas, and the skills and interest to learn. If we expect to do an entire career worth of learning in 2-4 years we're going to be dissapointed every time.

    1. Re:On the other hand, we know how to scale by skam240 · · Score: 1

      This is all very nice but I'd like to see some data before I will even become anywhere close to believing kids will learn better via automation than via a human teacher.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  24. Re:Don't name a U after yourself, that's obvious n by quenda · · Score: 1

    You are not being vilified. I'm just grumpy when people ruin a joke, thinking they made the joke. Nothing personal, we've all done it.

    You know this "Derangement", be it left or right, is not a real thing, just a vague insult?
    Wouldn't "partisan" be a better word?

  25. Sheesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They forgot to build the damn pyramid first.

  26. Re:Classic problem with computer science educators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are you talking about good teachers when you have a shitty job and can't even afford a car? If it was a really good teacher you would have learned some kind of life skill.

  27. Even in the 1990s/2000s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About half of the CS teachers (ranging from Programming/Algorithm/Operating System Design to HTML development classes) were upper division Mathematics teachers. The other half was a split between computer professionals of various calibers and a small selection of business/econ professors who were mostly teacher introductory level classes or classes centered around business applications (mostly Microsoft Office or its predecessor individual classes.)

    Fast forward to today and outside of specific classes many of them are web hipsters without a serious interest or passion in computers. Many of the math guys got slowly churned out of running the classes as 'web designers' took over the introductory classes and then the scripting classes, often leading to a better design experience for the plebs, but also a worse scripting experience for anyone seeking to be a professional with a low instance of bugs. I am glad I got to experience those classes when I did, because they have degraded severely in the intervening 2 decades.

    Getting back to the subject of this: Steve Wozniak pulling a Donald Trump? Not surprising at all, he's basically been acting like a huckster for years. I think that injury to his head never quite recovered fully.

  28. Why read when you can donate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why anyone would pay that sort of money when you can buy a $50 book and learn from that.

    Head First by O'Reilly:
    https://www.humblebundle.com/books/head-first-books

    Learn you some code:
    https://www.humblebundle.com/books/learn-you-some-code-books

    And I saved you $20.

  29. Same ol' pattern? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Steve Jobs said Woz was a lack-luster coder. He'd procrastinate and get distracted by some gee-whiz side project. For example, he never finished the floating point version of Apple BASIC he promised Jobs.

    1. Re:Same ol' pattern? by technosaurus · · Score: 1

      Didn't he write something with pen and paper from a jail cell?

    2. Re:Same ol' pattern? by pauljlucas · · Score: 2

      Woz did the hardware for the Apple I and ][ using a few neat tricks. He also wrote its first DOS. But he has not done anything of consequence since.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    3. Re:Same ol' pattern? by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

      What part of Apple technology did Steve Jobs develop again?

    4. Re:Same ol' pattern? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's why Steve Jobs never opened a coding bootcamp I guess...

    5. Re:Same ol' pattern? by infolation · · Score: 1

      He made the code shiny.

    6. Re:Same ol' pattern? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve Jobs said Woz was a lack-luster coder.

      And Jobs didn't code at all, just got rich off of those who did.

    7. Re:Same ol' pattern? by LifesABeach · · Score: 2

      Several things come to mind for me. One uncontested item is the beratement of hired workers, bravo Steve. Next is the gutting of entire departments for the 10 cents on the dollar H1B (temp?) workers. And a cap stone of unequaled pride; thinking that meditation would cure his diagnosed operable cancer.

    8. Re:Same ol' pattern? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What part of Apple technology did Steve Jobs develop again?

      Person X being lazy doesn't preclude Person Y from also being lazy. Overall, Woz seemed more motivated with hardware than software, though.

  30. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a typical polytechnic level ("university of applied sciences aka shit-tier) software engineering education in my country.
    Many (most) teachers outsource the education to external documents and lectures are read straight from papers, might as well be pre-recorded. Questions are not welcome for many teachers.
    Everything is out of date and teachers push their personal and corporote-influenced agendas. Symbian was forcefully pushed until roughly the day Elop talked about burning platforms.
    You only get anything worthwhile out of it if you study by yourself.
    At least I didn't have to pay for this garbage.

    Finland, Finland, Finland, I didn't even get a pony ride.

  31. who the hell wants to be normal by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Id rather get exceptional rare teaching.

    everything else is just cat book | brain.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:who the hell wants to be normal by skam240 · · Score: 1

      And if you want "exceptionally rare teaching" you need to be paying a decent wage.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  32. you mean how to be an ass hole by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    how to rip people off,
    how to get credit from others work.
    how to get the weak to do the night shifts.
    how to scam more VC money for crap products.
    how to pump then dump stocks, change jobs every 6 months.
    how to get excess huge stocks for free, and sell 2 days before
    product releases.
    how to sell shitty mobile apps to spammers for 7 digits+.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  33. Re: Classic problem with computer science educator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Algorithms. Yeah, those help you work together on a 1000 man project.

  34. Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This really isn't surprising. The idea of charging a significant chunk of change for a faulty product has always been Apple's business model, so woz is just working with what he knows.

  35. Re: Fuck you Woz Worshippers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll find that the case with LITERAL FUCKING NAZIS. They'll own up to their horrific mistakes to some extent; they will try to convince you things weren't nearly as shitty as reality testifies, but they'll keep their name attached.

    This is much worse than our erudite, well educated Democrat saviors, who will deny before you even inquire as to their misdeeds, oh, certainly.

  36. And do they even link to Stackoverflow? by grungeman · · Score: 1

    I would hope so. Because I got news for you: Even real programmers do not know everything and tend to forget stuff, but they know where to look things up. And maybe that was the purpose of linking to Wikipedia, to teach you how to use the Internet.

    Here is an example of my work yesterday.
    - For a webapp I had to find the greatest common divider for the width and height of an image. Had no idea how to do that, so I searched stackoverflow for "greatest common divider javascript" and found this helpful answer.
    - One of the comments links to the Euclidean algorithm on Wikipedia, so I followed the link to understand the algorithm behind the solution.
    - Finally I came up with this wondeful one-liner for my specific case:
    var whGcd = function gcd(a,b){ return b ? gcd(b, a%b) : a; }(width, height);

    That's how I work. Lot's of Wikipedia links involved.

    --

    Signature deleted by lameness filter.
    1. Re:And do they even link to Stackoverflow? by mangastudent · · Score: 1

      When MIT was trialing 6.01, the first half of their replacement for 6.001-4, the first being the Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs "Wizzard Book" course, this one using Python to drive robots, the official course material included a link to Wikipedia on differential equations, since it was quite possible people taking the course hadn't studied them in sufficient detail by the time this was needed in the course.

    2. Re:And do they even link to Stackoverflow? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Looks like Woz-U needs some quality control. I followed the Hype trail of Woz-U to its web page source. Maybe Woz-U can create a fourth track called, "Quality Assurance?" This track mentors participants in the dark art called, "QA", by exploring TDD, and BDD Software Test Modeling. This would create a splinter group that could clean up the Woz-U environment; also.

  37. WOZ Thread! by buravirgil · · Score: 0

    Certainly not rare on /., but by proportion to Jobs's threads, can feel negligible. Anyone asserting Woz has not "done" anything since the ][ and its disk operating system has not read enough about what the ][ was (engineering wise) and should not forget Gates bought his DOS from a married couple. Gates wrote a BASIC, to be fair. But how did Gates' millions to commoditize education pan out?

    What's Woz done, lately? Pffft
    That da Vinci guy? He hasn't done crap since the Mona Lisa.

    The summary, for crying out loud, characterizes this as a social justice effort. I doubt Woz collects a dime. A comparison to Trump U. is a stretch. When Woz starts hawking faulty transistors to S. Africa, maybe then it's an analogue. Woz chose to teach fifth grade for how many years? Woz is a softie. A Woodstock-inspired dreamer.

    Whose father empowered him to task electrical engineering from its molecular underpinnings to its architectural limits. If you haven't read Woz' book and have come on to this thread to share your opinion, please choose to masturbate on another site.

    --
    Would were! Should is! Could be! And live a hundred times three.
    1. Re:WOZ Thread! by mccalli · · Score: 2

      To be fair, you say 'Anyone asserting Woz has not "done" anything since the ][ and its disk operating system has not read enough about what the ][ was', which directly talks about the Apple II. You don't mention anything he's done since, but let's be quick - all of them were as an investor except one (Wheels of Zeus - tags to track your kids) and to my knowledge at least all of them have been commercial failures. Woz was a great 8 bit circuit board engineer, but so were many others. Remember Woz couldn't actually get the board to boot and needed Chuck Peddle to intervene - even then you had to boot it twice to clear the memory. Being a great circuit layout guy doesn't qualify you (or disqualify you) from being able to run a university. I'm sticking with it - I've seen nothing he's done since that has been a great advance.

    2. Re:WOZ Thread! by mccalli · · Score: 1

      Apologies - paragraphs:

      To be fair, you say 'Anyone asserting Woz has not "done" anything since the ][ and its disk operating system has not read enough about what the ][ was', which directly talks about the Apple II. You don't mention anything he's done since, but let's be quick - all of them were as an investor except one (Wheels of Zeus - tags to track your kids) and to my knowledge at least all of them have been commercial failures.

      Woz was a great 8 bit circuit board engineer, but so were many others. Remember Woz couldn't actually get the board to boot and needed Chuck Peddle to intervene - even then you had to boot it twice to clear the memory. Being a great circuit layout guy doesn't qualify you (or disqualify you) from being able to run a university. I'm sticking with it - I've seen nothing he's done since that has been a great advance.

  38. Re: Don't name a U after yourself, that's obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Broham - look out! There's a NAZI hiding under your bed!!

  39. 33 weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to get illuminated?

  40. So apparently Woz just sold out his name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woz to me lives off the past, collects some checks from selling off his name and doesn't care what that is. The program sounds like its not worth much in terms of learning code.

  41. Kamp Krusty anyone? by tonyyeb · · Score: 1

    Woz not knowing about what is going on in an institution under his own name reminds me of the Simpsons episode when Krusty turns up at Kamp Krusty after the kids revolt. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  42. not involved by sad_ · · Score: 2

    "Steve Wozniak said that he's "not involved" in the "operational aspects" of Woz U and doesn't know anything about the report this morning."

    What i don't understand is why these people let others use their name and then produce a lousy product/service? Do this enough times and your good name will be gone and hard to restore to it's former glory.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re:not involved by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      Apparently it's now part of "Art Institutes":
      https://www.republicreport.org/2018/inside-a-for-profit-college-conversion-lucrative-ties-troubling-actions/

      I run DCEH, Richardson said. I run Woz U.

      That was true. Richardson, while serving as head of DCEH, which is a subsidiary of the faith-based, Los Angeles-headquartered non-profit Dream Center, is also the chairman of the board of Woz U., which is connected to a network of for-profit companies owned or staffed by Richardson, his close relatives, and long-time associates.

      You can file a complaint, Richardson said on the call with his staff, but I’m not going to answer your 62 questions. Go back to work, he said, or whatever you do. For some of those listening, Richardson’s tone was not just hostile, but intimidating.

      And there's this:
      https://www.citizen.org/sites/default/files/university-of-greed-public-citizen-education-report-2018.pdf

      Brent Richardson, who helped engineer the transformation of Arizona-based Grand Canyon
      University from a religious non-profit school into a publicly-traded for-profit giant, is now
      CEO of Dream Center Education Holdings LLC, which is owned by a Los Angeles-based
      Christian nonprofit 167 that purchased 31 Art Institute schools, plus South University and
      Argosy University. Dream Center has hired a former Trump campaign advisor, Barry Bennett
      to lobby on its behalf and paid Bennett $90,000 in the first quarter of 2018, according to a
      lobbying disclosure form.168

      I never heard of "Art Institutes" before; anyone? Doesn't sound good though.

  43. Re: Classic problem with computer science educato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have a crappy executable for a brain? I would much rather have it under procfs...

  44. or is it? by way2slo · · Score: 1

    "lots of times there's just hyperlinks to Microsoft documents, to Wikipedia"

    So it's just like working a real job, then? ;)

  45. So, is there a ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, is there a torrent for this e-book? I just want to see if these charges have merit, for myself.

  46. Re:Fuck you Woz Worshippers by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    > and the Apple 2

    What does the Apple ][ have to do with Woz U ???

  47. Wozniak is a has-been who can't think for himself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Resting on his laurels is his job now.
    Don't expect anything interesting from his corner... ever.

  48. Re:Classic problem with computer science educators by skam240 · · Score: 2

    Let me it put it more plainly. You are using anecdotal evidence to try to establish a norm. Your experience with your teacher is magnificent but it does nothing to dispute my point that there is no economic incentive for people skilled with computers to teach. Sure, there will always be those passionate about teaching enough to forgo money in the name of educating others but you can't base an entire educational system on good fucking will.

    Why I have to explain this to a grown ass adult is beyond me.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  49. Eight times better? by raymorris · · Score: 1

    The Georgia Tech online masters in computer science costs $7,000. Typical cost to sit in a lecture hall is about $50,000. That traditional method is going to have to be a whole lot better to make it worth costing seven times as much.

    I've been around computer science, in software engineering, for 20 years. One thing I've learned is that to earn well over your career, you need to keep learning, keep your skills up to date. What you learned ten years ago in school isn't enough, in fact it's mostly just background education to make it easier to learn the tools and techniques you'll actually use in your job.

    If you have a spare $50,000 or $60,000 you want to spend on sitting in a classroom rather than watching the lecture from home or from the library, you're more than welcome to spend your money that way. I won't be doing that.

    1. Re:Eight times better? by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "The Georgia Tech online masters in computer science costs $7,000. Typical cost to sit in a lecture hall is about $50,000. That traditional method is going to have to be a whole lot better to make it worth costing seven times as much."

      Those costs are symptomatic of a fucked up system and not just the way things have to be. I mean, take a moment and do the math on a class full of students paying 50k each.

      "I've been around computer science, in software engineering, for 20 years. One thing I've learned is that to earn well over your career, you need to keep learning, keep your skills up to date. What you learned ten years ago in school isn't enough, in fact it's mostly just background education to make it easier to learn the tools and techniques you'll actually use in your job."

      Off topic. Keeping ones skills up to date is not the same as getting ones initial education.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    2. Re:Eight times better? by raymorris · · Score: 1

      > Off topic. Keeping ones skills up to date is not the same as getting ones initial education

      Ones education in computer science is very likely done in either a teaching language or an outdated language. Stanford teaches C, C++, and assembly. What do you think is most important to your employability:

      One guy has a 10% better understanding of the details of C.
      The other guy can do useful work in Python, C#, or Rust.

      If the $50,000 to sit in class DID help students learn the class stuff better, it would hardly matter. What matters os whether they can get the job done using the tools and techniques the company uses today, and is moving toward in the future.

      Do you by chance have $60,000 in student loans you need to justify?

    3. Re:Eight times better? by skam240 · · Score: 1

      So how are any of your points different from how software would teach people? Most commercial software has a terrible track record for being kept up to date.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  50. Huh? by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure I'm understanding your question. Can you rephrase it?

    I'm curious about your situation - are you employed by a university, or do you have $60,000 in student loans that you hope are worth it? For some reason you seem VERY resistant to the idea that people, including myself, can and did learn this stuff without spending $60,000 on the basics, before starting work. I'm wondering why that could be.

    Some of those expensive university comp sci courses used a book my mom wrote. She didn't have $60,000 in student loans when she *wrote* the book, so ...

    1. Re:Huh? by skam240 · · Score: 1

      What on earth does my occupation have to do with this and why should it have anything to do with the topic at hand?

      To acknowledge your other more reasonable request, you state,

      "Ones education in computer science is very likely done in either a teaching language or an outdated language."

      Why would Georgia Tech's online masters course be any different?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    2. Re:Huh? by raymorris · · Score: 1

      > What on earth does my occupation have to do with this and why should it have anything to do with the topic at hand?

      Just curious why you're so intent on insisting that my life doesn't exist. It *seems* kinda like for whatever reason you have some vested interest in insisting that one can't learn this stuff without incurring massive debt. One reason a person might take that position would be if they were SELLING $60,000 degrees. Another reason would be if they had spent $60,000 they couldn't afford and don't want to feel foolish about that decision. I'm sure there are other reasons someone might be invested in such an idea. Just curious what your reason is.

      > Why would Georgia Tech's online masters course be any different?

      Because being different from the centuries-old educational model is pretty much what the program is all about. They started with a blank slate and asked "what's the best and most efficient way for people to learn this material, given current technology and the current world?". Most programs start with the traditional university model which was created at the University of Paris and Oxford in the 12th century, then make small adjustments.

    3. Re:Huh? by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "Just curious why you're so intent on insisting that my life doesn't exist. It *seems* kinda like for whatever reason you have some vested interest in insisting that one can't learn this stuff without incurring massive debt."

      Please show me where I have suggested that at all. You're fucking making shit up and I have zero patience for people who put words in my mouth.

      "One reason a person might take that position would be if they were SELLING $60,000 degrees."

      So the person who literally said "Those costs are symptomatic of a fucked up system and not just the way things have to be." is the person selling degrees. Right, you're a fucking genius.

      My local JC which is one of the best in the country and is a feeder school to many nearby top universities. It charges next to nothing per unit ( https://accounting.santarosa.e... ) while maintaining an amazing campus with great facilities. Sure, a school that teaches 4 year degrees will need to charge a bit more to pay for upper division level educators but there's no excuse for the truly massive difference in costs between these two layers of education.

      "Because being different from the centuries-old educational model is pretty much what the program is all about. They started with a blank slate and asked "what's the best and most efficient way for people to learn this material, given current technology and the current world?". Most programs start with the traditional university model which was created at the University of Paris and Oxford in the 12th century, then make small adjustments."

      Right. So basically you're telling me internet classes are better because you say so?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    4. Re:Huh? by raymorris · · Score: 1

      Well, whatever your situation or thoughts may be, the fact remains that I exist. Though I perhaps not as well known as Robert, my contributions to the technologies we're using to communicate right now are well documented. I didn't go $60,000 into debt to do so. I read the books myself, and did not pay a professor to stand in front of me doing the lecture. I DID watch a lot of well-known experts present information on video. These arw the facts. Your path is your path, but it's not the only path.

    5. Re:Huh? by skam240 · · Score: 1

      And yet you seem to think base and massively incomplete anecdotal evidence is meaningful in a scientific context. Oh wait, a complete education would have taught you how to properly process data. Score one for a proper college education.

      I'm sure you got a good education in regards to core skills but your lack of understanding in the processing of societal data is showing.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  51. PS: Bruce Perens is also here on Slashdot by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Btw, Bruce Perens is also a regular on Slashdot. He's had a pretty decent career, I'd say. Achieved quite a lot. One thing I don't think he's done is blow $60,000 putting the name of a fancy school on a piece of paper. He teaches university courses, he doesn't buy overpriced ones.

    I'm sorry if you're struggling to pay your student loan debt or whatever, but your kids do NOT have to do the same thing. It's not required. I hope you don't tell them that it is. That would be really mean.

    1. Re:PS: Bruce Perens is also here on Slashdot by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Good for that lone individual. My comment about anecdotal data seems to have flown directly over your head.

      "I'm sorry if you're struggling to pay your student loan debt or whatever"

      Yet again with putting bullshit motives on me. You're unbelievable. If this information is so fucking crucial for you I have zero student debt and never had to accrue any meaningful amounts while getting my degree. I've literally showed you a way to get a degree in a much cheaper fashion than what you're going on about and still you persist with this shit.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  52. And who the fuck is... by skam240 · · Score: 1

    And who the fuck is "Robert"? Your naming of names in a first name context makes you sound much more like a lame hipster than an intellectual. It literally diminishes whatever you're trying to accomplish by naming names. If you have to tell some one about your accomplishments they probably aren't as important as you want them to be.

    And they certainly aren't so when you're make such absurd and uneducated claims.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.