Slashdot Mirror


China Infiltrated Apple, Amazon and Other US Companies Using Spy Chips on Servers, According To Bloomberg; Apple, and Amazon, Among Others Refute the Report (bloomberg.com)

Data center equipment run by Amazon Web Services and Apple were subject to surveillance from the Chinese government via a tiny microchip inserted during the equipment manufacturing process, Bloomberg BusinessWeek reported Thursday, citing 17 people at Apple, Amazon, and U.S. government security officials, among others. The compromised chips in question came from a server company called Supermicro that assembled machines used in the centers, the report added. The scrutiny of these chips, which were used for gathering intellectual property and trade secrets from American companies, have also been the subject of an ongoing top secret U.S. government investigation, which started in 2015, the news outlet reported. Amazon, which runs AWS, Apple, and Supermicro have disputed summaries of Bloomberg BusinessWeek's reporting.

The report states that Amazon became aware of a Supermicro's tiny microchip nested on the server motherboards of Elemental Technologies, a Portland, Oregon based company, as part of a due diligence ahead of acquiring the company in 2015. Amazon acquired Elemental as it prepared to use its technologies for what is now known as Prime Video, its video streaming service. The report adds that Amazon informed the FBI of its findings. From the report: One official says investigators found that it eventually affected almost 30 companies, including a major bank, government contractors, and the world's most valuable company, Apple. Apple was an important Supermicro customer and had planned to order more than 30,000 of its servers in two years for a new global network of data centers. Three senior insiders at Apple say that in the summer of 2015, it, too, found malicious chips on Supermicro motherboards. Apple severed ties with Supermicro the following year, for what it described as unrelated reasons. [...] [Update: Some counterpoint: According to an earlier report by The Information, security concerns were indeed a reason why Apple and Supermicro parted ways.] A U.S. official says the government's probe is still examining whether spies were planted inside Supermicro or other American companies to aid the attack. Some background on Supermicro, courtesy of Bloomberg: Today, Supermicro sells more server motherboards than almost anyone else. It also dominates the $1 billion market for boards used in special-purpose computers, from MRI machines to weapons systems. Its motherboards can be found in made-to-order server setups at banks, hedge funds, cloud computing providers, and web-hosting services, among other places. Supermicro has assembly facilities in California, the Netherlands, and Taiwan, but its motherboards -- its core product -- are nearly all manufactured by contractors in China. The company's pitch to customers hinges on unmatched customization, made possible by hundreds of full-time engineers and a catalog encompassing more than 600 designs. Further reading: Amazon Offloaded Its Chinese Server Business Because it Was Compromised, Report Says.

369 comments

  1. Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I want a screen-print of the chip pin-out on my desk by lunchtime.

    1. Re:Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure Mr. President, we'll get right to that.

      Hey Bill, can you take this ELI5 discussion from Reddit and dumb it down into a ScreenBeans Powerpoint presentation by lunchtime for the moron-in-chief? Thanks.

    2. Re:Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless I see this pervasive grain-of-rice spy chip, this article is bullshit.

    3. Re:Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure thing, Jeffery. But can you stop referring to our ass-in-chief as a moron? He likes to think of himself as a stubborn ass, not a dimwit! Also, what's your login password again, I keep forgetting mine! Senior asswiper-for-the orange-hairy-dude-in-chief!

  2. Be 100% sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Someone else can see your data in AWS, Azure, etc.

    1. Re:Be 100% sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone else can see your data in AWS, Azure, etc.

      For that matter, your personal hard drive. Your computer has a motherboard as well.

    2. Re:Be 100% sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone else can see your data in AWS, Azure, etc.

      Sure, but my data is encrypted before uploaded to the cloud.

  3. Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Chinese market poison as baby food. Nobody should be doing business with them.

    1. Re:Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It wasn't baby food, it was medicine. The worse part about it was that people would give their babies more medicine when they started to get sick, making it worse.

    2. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Type44Q · · Score: 2

      It was baby formula.

    3. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Great news, it was both. Many, many different incidents to choose from. Many different products.

    4. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was talking about http://toxikonconsortium.org/F...

      which was medicine in Haiti.

      The Chinese manufacturer had replace glycerine with propylene glycol to save money. Lots of children died.

      Are you talking about a different incident?

    5. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Jahoda · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Chinese _executed_ quite a few people responsible for that. Say what you will,heads literally rolled. I know you're just here to stir shit up, so you don't care, however.

    6. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by tomxor · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Chinese manufacturer had replace glycerine with propylene glycol to save money. Lots of children died.

      I'm no toxicologist but I think you must mean "Diethylene glycol" not "Propylene Glycol"... if you look up the later on wikipedia in the human safety section [1] it states:

      The acute oral toxicity of propylene glycol (E1520) is very low, and large quantities are required to cause perceptible health damage in humans

      Where as Diethylene glycol (which is in the paper you reference at the very start of the toxological analysis section) and the wikipedia article [2] suggests it has high toxicity (albeit only empirically due to involvement in mass poisonings.):

      Despite the discovery of DEG’s toxicity in 1937 and its involvement in mass poisonings around the world, the information available regarding human toxicity is limited. Some authors suggest the minimum toxic dose is estimated at 0.14 mg/kg of body weight and the lethal dose is between 1.0 and 1.63 g/kg of body weight...

      [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Anyway it's nasty stuff... however it should be noted that most of these types of events on the Asian continent are more due to lack of strict regulation on food and medicine than malice. Fake medicine is a real problem over there due to the distribution channels, people but stuff in shops with no way to know how authentic it is... and we all know how good the Chinese are at making rip-offs, unfortunately when you swap out expensive components of a medicine without really knowing what you are doing the difference is death rather than a short lived knock-off.

    7. Re:Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, well, nobody should be doing business with the US either, it's not like they don't do stuff like this.

      Cite a case of a private business in the US injecting chips into a trillion dollar foreign company in order to steal their proprietary secrets.

      Cite a case of the US government funding a branch of their military to steal proprietary secrets of foreign companies in order to pass that information on to US businesses for competitive purposes.

      There's only one country that has done "stuff like this" and only one country that continues to do so. US == Evil is the zeitgeist but it simply isn't true.

    8. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes there was another incident with baby formula in China. Some people were executed over it.

    9. Re:Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they don't

    10. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they shoot or gas/drug them, not guillotine... so no, not *literally*.

    11. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Heads rolled after the fact, yes. Mostly to save face, I think, and make a public message of "Look! See, we have laws too!" Every time it happens, it comes off looking more like PR and and an attempt to hobble further investigation. My question is always: what controls are you pitting in place to make sure this doesn't happen again?

      Whether it's adulterated baby formula, or adulterated medicine, or adulterated pork buns, t comes down to someone taking risks to make a fast profit. Plenty of that happens everywhere in the world, but it seems to be in China that the controls are lax enough and the people are desperate enough to actually KILL THEIR CUSTOMERS in order to make money.

    12. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They executed the people by chopping their heads off???

    13. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Chaset · · Score: 1

      I think he was talking about this one:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
    14. Re:Ever get tired of being Wong? by Cederic · · Score: 0

      Sure, all those foreign trillion dollar companies out there. You fuckwit.

      There's only one country that has done "stuff like this"

      Is there fuck.

      But hey, have some evidence: https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

      The US engages in commercial and industrial espionage at least as much as anybody else.

    15. Re:Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US is said to use NSA spying as industrial spying for Airbus vs Boeing contracts, etc.

      Also, when US interests want to take over a foreign company, e.g. a European industry company, they'll dig shit on members of the leadership. There's always some little embezzlement or irregularity, or insider trading or possibly bringing a sexual harassment case, and the target company likely does business in the US so they can be attacked on the US front. So, these execs are faced with a choice of sell and cash in, or face law suits and even prison.
      Sorry I have no specifics I was just told that's what the US does, and that was a left-wing politician talking about General Electrics buying Alstom. I choose to believe but the topic would have to be dug upon.

    16. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Every time it happens, it comes off looking more like PR and and an attempt to hobble further investigation."
      Whoever smelt it dealt it.

    17. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Globalist Silicon Valley Quizlings pimped the slants ... then USA we got the slants like AIDS in an open azzwhole.

    18. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And after their dog and pony show, the people that did that moved on to contaminated dog treats since those victims can't talk.

    19. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by nnull · · Score: 1

      Snowden? Oh we forgot about him. Nevermind, not important anymore.

    20. Re:Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, there is poisoned baby food, there is subprime mortgage. I guess they are toxic in different ways

    21. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Jahoda · · Score: 0

      What I think is that it's interesting that an Anonymous Coward gets as doubly-upmodded as you've gotten for this agitprop drivel.

      But, that's the new Slashdot where "politics" is concerned.. And frankly, I think all of you little neofascist fucks... or whatever the fuck you call yourselves.... need to fuck off and die.

      And you will. the conflicts you so desire will swallow you. As they have done 100% of the time the last few thousand years.

    22. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To spy on potential terrorists, not espionage for financial gain*.

      How do people intentionally ignore critical info just to sound stupid? No, it's NOT the same, you dumb motherfucker.

      *for the most part

    23. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should look into this more as you are misinformed. The Americans were so surprised how the Europeans (France in particular) were so goddamn dirty, they intervened. Seriously, fucking bribes is how European deals of any decent size is done.

    24. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to lead with, "Actually..."

      Nobody gives a shit, you chubby nerd.

    25. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet International bodies looking at this indicate that the level of bribery within Europe is low to very low.

    26. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Sorry, Americans market poison as chick attracting beverages, weight loss aids, and medication. I'm not sure why you would do business with them. See, anyone can pick a few examples and paint an entire country as malicious. #TrumptardAlertTriggered

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    27. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree with you, it's not quite as bad as other misuses of the word literally. In the common vernacular, "heads will roll" is an idiom, it doesn't actually mean you are executing someone. So when it does, for some people that is enough to make it literal even if the form of execution was not guillotine. Kinda like raining cats and dogs. You don't need cats and dogs to be forming from precipitate high up in the atmosphere in order for it to be literally raining cats and dogs, the cats and dogs merely need to be falling some distance.

      If we want to take back the word literally, we're going to need to take figurative baby steps.

    28. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read a book get a passport

    29. Re:Ever get tired of being Wong? by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      Does this count?

    30. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three executives were sentenced to death. Two were executed. Others got life in prison.

    31. Re: Ever get tired of being Wong? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      What if you expose the propylene glycol to high temperatures then inhale it?
      What happens if the high temperature degrades the propylene glycol to formaldehyde and then you breathe it in?

  4. Apple and Others Respond by WankerWeasel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apple and other companies have responded. It would seem Bloomberg has done little to provide any evidence over the past year, while these companies have investigated and found nothing of substance to the claims. Apple's response in particular is strongly worded and makes it clear that they find these claims to be baseless. https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

    1. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wowee companies that rely on the trust of your everyday dupe, and cheap Chinese labor, step up to defend the Chinese government!

      Where'd the chips come from? They are physical things that exist. Do you think Bloomberg faked the paper trail all the way up the supply chain to some chinese factory that admits pressure from government/military?

    2. Re: Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh. They replied with strong words! So it is all fake news. Wtf do you think is gonna happen if your chips are fabricated in prc? They do the same shit as we do (ime), but more widespread.

      But yea. Strong words. Toddler.

    3. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Apple is lying.

    4. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple also says that they never intentionally slow down old phones and that police can't hack the iPhone.

      Who cares what Apple says? They lie all the time.

    5. Re:Apple and Others Respond by TomBauserman · · Score: 2

      Of course they're going to deny this. Oh yeah btw we've had chinese chips spying on everything for who knows long.

    6. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Hmm I think Apple would love to find evidence that the PC ecosystem is compromised and fundamentally flawed.

    7. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe but apple is the biggest liar in the industry, Id actually believe the Chinese over apple.

    8. Re: Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "no reasonable person would believe [us]"

      Didn't they recently suffer from a severe lapse in manufacturing, allowing the Intel Management Engine to be reprogrammed? The one that has full access to the Cpu?

      Prior, they had root access without passwords.

      How can they refute it so strongly? Both of those gave full access to the computer. Both had to have been introduced by someone

    9. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, I bet it was strongly worded. With all of Apple's production in China, the Chinese could stop every iDevice from being made until Apple restaged manufacturing outside of China. While Apple has the cash reserves to weather the lack of product for over a year while that happens, the decline in market share during that interregnum would be near-fatal, if not fatal.

    10. Re: Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Apple is also a huge customer of Supermicro. It would be a teensy bit of an embarrassment to admit that Siri and iClouds datacenters are bugged, wouldn't you say?

    11. Re:Apple and Others Respond by harrkev · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As a guy who DESIGNS hardware, I can confidently say this....

      Yes, it is possible to make a tiny chip that can disguise itself as a capacitor or a resistor. However, this part must be designed into the board for that purpose. There is such a thing as a "one wire interface." The part that it is talking to must know it is there and be intentionally taking to it.

      However, adding a chip like this (a two-terminal part as shown in the article) to an existing product not designed for it seems very problematic. I can immediately think of three options for such a ghost part:

      1) Pretends to be a signal filter capacitor. Possible, but it likely would not have the power to actively disrupt the signal flowing past it. This thing would only have access to ONE power rail and can get parasitic power off of the signal. But this kind of part would not have the power to actively disrupt the signal.

      2) Pretends to be a resistor. This is even worse, because usually low-value resistors are used, so the voltage drop would be minimal. I cannot imagine how this part would get its power.

      3) Pretend to be a pull-up or pull-down resistor. This might be useful in mis-configuring a part. It could alter its configuration to get the board into some sort of test mode. The problem is that this configuration would not allow the chip to receive any information from the outside world. So how do you control it?

      Of course, this assumes that the part really is just a two-terminal part (as shown in the article). If they replace an active device, something with three or more pins, then all of those limitations go away. Some sort of level converter in a signal path would be an ideal candidate. If you could drop a chip somewhere in the Ethernet interface path, then you can do anything you want... But those chips would look like chips and could not be mistaken for a passive component.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    12. Re:Apple and Others Respond by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Bloomberg is making an assertion, so the burden is on them to back it up with evidence. So far they have nothing.

      These are all public companies, and there are significant penalties for intentionally lying about things that affect their stock price (ask Elon Musk about that). Since all of them are saying the same thing, and saying it clearly, unambiguously, and emphatically, it is very likely they are telling the truth.

    13. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not knowing the specific of what was done and what little I know of circuit board design...I believe some motherboards have a base design with the ability to add additional processing power or features to the board depending on what the application for the board is. So if you want a cheap system you get the base with little feature set. But if you want the high end board you get the extra chipsets and I bet that is where this extra chip was introduced. I probably looked like something that was supposed to be there and actually did something and worked with the rest of the circuit.

    14. Re:Apple and Others Respond by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So playing devil's advocate here: They could have modified the design, burying the extra traces in interior layers. After approval and the initial production run would you go poking around the boards being shipped out that closely to notice some small extra vias that had been masked over? Would you pull a board apart to view the inner layers if there were no problems? We aren't talking about a rogue employee here but a state sponsored program so you would expect it to have the engineering capability to modify a board design in a way as to not interfere with it's normal functionality. If they compromised the PCB manufacturer and assembly partner they could slip it in any time they wanted to.

      Now I'm not saying I'm buying this story. The very specific, very adamant denials from Amazon isn't the type of denial you would normally expect in a situation like this if they coudln't talk. But it is possible.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    15. Re:Apple and Others Respond by harrkev · · Score: 2

      If they could modify the board, then yes, this sort of thing becomes MUCH more likely.

      The down side to this is that modifications MIGHT be detectable by tests. Lots of things can go wrong while building and assembling a board so tests are standard. Mucking about with it might create changes that can be detected during a standard bed-of-nails test. If the same company controls the test, then they could get away with it easily.

      The other side is that changing the board is easy to prove once you discover it.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    16. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News organizations do not have the standard where they become the indisputable experts on whatever esoterica they may discuss in news reports. Expecting someone to do so is ridiculous. News services rely upon sources for that. In this particular case it appears that action by a foreign government is part of the story so it may be that the US government does not wish to reveal exactly how much is known so that foreign government can assess what measures they take are compromised and what measures are not.

      Your insistence is non-standard for expectations of what news services do to back up claims. Your insistence can be seen as action of a foreign government to confuse the issue in the free world by taking advantage of a common fact...governments under attack don't share all their knowledge with the world. Your fist banging over identification of the chip is ridiculous on its face. You are baldfaced.

    17. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. I think Apple would hate to announce or verify any such finding. Instant stock price reduction.

    18. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't design hardware if you don't mention the old "Simply de-solder a pin on an IC to activate a different firmware mode" such as that which is used in the PS3Eye camera...

    19. Re:Apple and Others Respond by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Apple is part of the PC ecosystem. Their computers are capable of running Windows, just like every other PC; and every other PC is capable of running MacOS, just like every Mac.

      Apples motherboards (which they call logic boards, but they're literally the same damn thing) simple contain a superfluous bit of hardware (funny, TFA is about just that sort of thing) that unmodified MacOS checks for the presence of before booting; but it's simple to work around, and that little chip, present or not, has no affect on the operation of the system, from the end user's standpoint. Again, much like the one in TFA.

      Oh, and Apple's keyboard issues the past few years... I've had to go back and correct every single word in this post that contained the letter F. Some were missing, some were doubled, and I've been dealing with this for over a week.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    20. Re:Apple and Others Respond by jittles · · Score: 2

      If they could modify the board, then yes, this sort of thing becomes MUCH more likely.

      The down side to this is that modifications MIGHT be detectable by tests. Lots of things can go wrong while building and assembling a board so tests are standard. Mucking about with it might create changes that can be detected during a standard bed-of-nails test. If the same company controls the test, then they could get away with it easily.

      The other side is that changing the board is easy to prove once you discover it.

      That actually depends. Supposedly this thing is sitting on some data lines between the host CPU and the BMC. Having hardware debug level access to the CPU, it may be able to detect the current state of the system. For instance, Intel has a check you can make to see if the system has been marked as “End of Manufacturing” which is likely when they would do any quality tests. The chip could intelligently change behavior based on all kinds of things, depending on how sophisticated they’re able to make it. It’s pretty small and I have a hard time believing that such a small chip could have the proper capabilities to perform what is implied by the article. But the bus it supposedly sits on would basically give it god mode access to the entire system AND have network capabilities as long as the power supply is putting power to the board and there’s an active connection coming into the NIC.

    21. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider this info from public sources... Apple and AWS both operate custom hardware in their data centers and both companies design this hardware themselves. They have dedicated hardware, OS and network security teams... both have hardware design review and acceptance criteria for new designs, and both have security acceptance testing and inspection for incoming parts. Both perform integration testing and network commissioning procedures, and both have operational security and application security controls and alarms monitoring their production environments. The idea that a single downstream supplier could break all of these controls without leaving any evidence is extremely unlikely. I'd say it's more likely a disinformation campaign than an actual data security risk.

    22. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to evaluate the credibility of a news organization (albeit financial news) whose business model depends on accurate and timely information with a business whose profit is derived from selling products and software.

    23. Re: Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't make a credible claim tho.

      They just said "hey we heard u guys r backdoored by china"

    24. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      bullshit. chinas bubble is already near bursting

    25. Re:Apple and Others Respond by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Consider this info from public sources... Apple and AWS both operate custom hardware in their data centers and both companies design this hardware themselves. They have dedicated hardware, OS and network security teams... both have hardware design review and acceptance criteria for new designs, and both have security acceptance testing and inspection for incoming parts. Both perform integration testing and network commissioning procedures, and both have operational security and application security controls and alarms monitoring their production environments. The idea that a single downstream supplier could break all of these controls without leaving any evidence is extremely unlikely. I'd say it's more likely a disinformation campaign than an actual data security risk.

      Is it unlikely? They will test and inspect server #1 off the line like crazy. They won't do the same level of testing for server #100. or #1000. The compromise we are talking about here was a small component to enable access, not something shipping out data by itself. And remember, these are servers being built by contractors in China, so they are out of the control of the designers here in the US during manufacturing. And we are talking about a state actor with, from a practical standpoint, unlimited resources here, so covering it up becomes a bit easier.

      Also, this wasn't a Amazon design, it was a third party company and Amazon's audit of the equipment is what uncovered it.

      If any of this is actually true, of course.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    26. Re: Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Youre right.

      Anyway Amazon and Apple need their customers to trust that their data stored in the respective clouds are safe. The data is not safe if the chicoms have put kill switches all over amazons and apples data centers.

      Of course they are going to deny it. Plus itâ(TM)s like you said, they are scared to death of being shut out of China.

      I also think the fact that supermicro was delisted from nasdaq last month is indirect proof of these claims.

    27. Re:Apple and Others Respond by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      I think they were concerned about replacing chips for data communication and management functions with versions modified to perform the same function, plus send additional information to some nefarious location for analysis. I think the photo of a passive component is a red herring.

      Frankly, I smell a rat, not because its implausible to replace chips, but that it wouldn't have been spotted long ago and publicized. All these companies are denying that this is happening and I have yet to see compelling technical proof. Maybe somebody is floating a click bait article to influence stock prices.

      For information security scanning, including PCI for handling credit card data we have to scan for such things.

      When I run Wireshark on a lan with my SuperMicro and HP servers, I do see a bunch of weird shit that looks like management communications that until now I've ignored. That said, its not boatloads of illicit communication and it doesn't contain a nefarious payload. Its mostly IPV6 and management stuff that is blocked by our firewall and router.

      That said, we'd all better go back for another look at Wireshark logs to make sure...

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    28. Re:Apple and Others Respond by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      How on earth could they modify supermicro's design without Supermicro knowing? If SM doesn't design their own boards that might be possible but I doubt that's the case.

      About the only way I can see something like this type of compromise would be useful would be to either replace the aspeed BMC or hook something into the BMC.

      Both would likely be noticed by a QC check of the boards. The sneaky one would be to replace the whole Aspeed BMC with a custom chip but you'd have the problem of having to run the BMC exactly the same so the firmware will actually run. This would be incredibly difficult to design and implement.

    29. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from the Bloomberg article:

      "Apple made its discovery of suspicious chips inside Supermicro servers around May 2015, after detecting odd network activity and firmware problems, according to a person familiar with the timeline."

    30. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is the claim that Apple and Amazon completely stopped using Supermicro components around the time they discovered the compromises. Can this be verified? There is also the possibility of an ongoing intelligence operation. Could that alter the statements given by the companies? I'm guessing national security concerns outweigh SEC regulations.

      The burden is on Supermicro's smaller customers who would be sacrificed by all parties in an intelligence game. But do we even have alternatives? I'll say that I am concerned.

    31. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the article? There are claims of examples of sandwiching the chips in the layers of the board. There is also the claim that Supermicro, even in the USA, largely conducts business in Mandarin. If so, it is probably easier to infiltrate and discover details of the board design, and testing procedures. I'm guessing that motherboards designs are well within the competency of China's technical capability.

    32. Re:Apple and Others Respond by William+Baric · · Score: 2

      Evidence? That's so 1960. We now know that feelings are much more important to determine the truth than any of those "evidence" you speak of.

    33. Re:Apple and Others Respond by bongey · · Score: 1

      They did modify the PCBs , they even have a more advance design that has the chip between the layers of fiberglass. " In one case, the malicious chips were thin enough that they’d been embedded between the layers of fiberglass onto which the other components were attached, according to one person who saw pictures of the chips." https://techcrunch.com/2018/10...

    34. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      Slashdot: where obvious truth is modded -1

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    35. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      They didn't really say it had that much by way of capability... just code injection, and phone home. What logic would this thing really need?

      1. listen for "XXXX", inject "YYYY" (create remote vulnerability to exploit)
      2. loop: send packet to x.x.x.x once a week/month. (advertise presence)
      3. (optional) listen for kill signal, on kill signal HALT. (conceal self once access has been gained)

      Given the density of modern die fab processes, I can easily imagine something with that capability fitting on the head of a pin.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    36. Re:Apple and Others Respond by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Bloomberg's credibility haws been in the unreliable-to-dishonest range for a decade or more. Bloomberg seems to be getting worse by the day, increasingly toeing a leftist destroy-America line. My question is: what's Bloomberg's angle in this case?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    37. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > However, this part must be designed into the board for that purpose.

      From the fine Bloomberg article
      " In one case, the malicious chips were thin enough that they’d been embedded between the layers of fiberglass onto which the other components were attached, according to one person who saw pictures of the chips. That generation of chips was smaller than a sharpened pencil tip..."

      We hand off our Bill of Materials (BOM) and Gerber files to our board assembly house here in the US. If you are determined, you could reverse engineer the schematics.

      Once this is done...again, from the fine Bloomberg article

      "In some cases, plant managers were approached by people who claimed to represent Supermicro or who held positions suggesting a connection to the government. The middlemen would request changes to the motherboards’ original designs, initially offering bribes in conjunction with their unusual requests. If that didn’t work, they threatened factory managers with inspections that could shut down their plants. Once arrangements were in place, the middlemen would organize delivery of the chips to the factories."

      Designing the original board to work at speed was probably problematic for SuperMicro; trying to seed modifications to the board AND STILL HAVE IT WORK AT SPEED, particularly if you are only given Gerber files and a BOM...Well....

      Impressive, most impressive.

    38. Re:Apple and Others Respond by jittles · · Score: 1

      They didn't really say it had that much by way of capability... just code injection, and phone home. What logic would this thing really need? 1. listen for "XXXX", inject "YYYY" (create remote vulnerability to exploit) 2. loop: send packet to x.x.x.x once a week/month. (advertise presence) 3. (optional) listen for kill signal, on kill signal HALT. (conceal self once access has been gained) Given the density of modern die fab processes, I can easily imagine something with that capability fitting on the head of a pin.

      I think it has to have decent processing power in order to spy on the BMC's bus without causing a noticeably long delay while it's halting the host CPU to inject these new instructions.

    39. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a similar background to you, and you're thinking mirrors mine.

      My first thought it more like a #4, though - pretends to be a bypass capacitor. Then, on receipt of some external signal from the attacker (RF, powerline communication, optical, elapsed time) it turns into a dead short. Not very elegant, but it could be very destructive.

       

    40. Re:Apple and Others Respond by aphelion_rock · · Score: 1

      As a guy who DESIGNS hardware, I can confidently say this....

      ...However, adding a chip like this (a two-terminal part as shown in the article) to an existing product not designed for it seems very problematic......

      Looks like it has 3 connections to me..
      https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

    41. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As we are on Slashdot, technological details matter much more than mere speculations

      So playing devil's advocate here: They could have modified the design, burying the extra traces in interior layers

      Please watch the two videos below. First link, the making of PCB.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Second one, the 'pick and place machines' which put and solder in the various components (capacitors, resistors, et cetera) on PCBs.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      There are multiple check and verification processes, and if the design had been tampered with, the motherboard would have failed the myriads of built-in verification processes.

    42. Re: Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Have you ever done QA on a newly manufactured board? No, they don't catch anything that thorough. Parts get put on wrong all the time. Parts get mislabelled, parts put into the wrong tray, etc.

    43. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are supposed to face fines for speculation (aka lies), that is far from the norm however. Elon was targeted.

      The Chinesese market is "massive" to some (ok a lot), of misinformed execs. They have a large population that is correct but they aren't going to run out and buy your product. The amount of market manipulation that goes on in these countries few can only begin to fathom (India is another example). We're talking about cultures that sabotage their own in pursuite of profit.

      The fucked up thing is we've KNOWN about their market manipulation yet governments continue to push their globalization agenda.

    44. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, this assumes that the part really is just a two-terminal part (as shown in the article).

      Obviously they don't have images of the real chip. The part they show in the article is just there to illustrate the size.

    45. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSA has monitor cables that use radio reflector tech to retransmit a monitor's image to a wireless listening post.

      All your hemming and hawing over "where does the power come from" ignores a century worth of powering spying devices externally using everything from EMF to acoustic harmonics (vibrate a quarts crystal you get electricity).

      Furthermore: The governments of this realm are about 130 years ahead of the tech that's currently known about in public. When Tesla was researching the "first" Radio, he noted signals that had to have an intelligent origin. It was existing Radio tech being used by governments / elites in secret (to game the stock market).

      Protip: Governmental = Govern Mental = Control Minds.
      Tech assisted Telepathy is known about in public now, AI that can predict your decisions by FMRI exists. Extrapolate 130 years.... Checkmate, Atheists.

    46. Re: Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the pictures are accurate then it has at least 6 pins.

    47. Re: Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article is saying that the boards were modified while being built at a subcontractor (ie. not the usual factory) when the orders were big enough that the usual factories couldnâ(TM)t meet demand. So the subcontractors were "in on it", and changed the design before building the boards when everybody was extremely rushed. So there wasnâ(TM)t somebody glueing new parts on boards after the fact. Then the boards slipped through hardware QA checks because the people checking knew about it and everyone else was rushed.

    48. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The part I see on the Bloomberg site has 6 pins.

    49. Re: Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michael Bloombergs vanity media channel from his billion dollar stock quote machine company ?!?

      Jeez stop smoking meth

    50. Re:Apple and Others Respond by whizzter · · Score: 1

      Considering it's Apple all they'd have to do is reschedule their yearly "new phone reveal" event to coincide with products starting to roll out of a new assembly line to get most of their regular customers to stay with them.
      (Add to this they could probably even release a cut-down phone at that event with only software updates and still save themselves if the timetable needed to be accelerated).

    51. Re:Apple and Others Respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the boards were off the shelf, then they wouldn’t be in Apple or Amazon data centers anyway because they both use custom gear. If the boards in question were custom, then Apple and Amazon control their design and the incoming inspection criteria . In terms of inspection sampling, the sample size would typically be set using a statistically valid method like Sqrt(N) + 1. So, for every 1000 boards received, you’d inspect 34 randomly selected boards and compare them against the approved design. You’re right, though, it’s not completely impossible that it could happen. To me, nothing in the articles addresses these issues so I’m inclined to think it’s FUD, probably competitor driven given the tensions w US and the rest of the world.

    52. Re:Apple and Others Respond by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      As we are on Slashdot, technological details matter much more than mere speculations

      So playing devil's advocate here: They could have modified the design, burying the extra traces in interior layers

      Please watch the two videos below. First link, the making of PCB. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Second one, the 'pick and place machines' which put and solder in the various components (capacitors, resistors, et cetera) on PCBs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... There are multiple check and verification processes, and if the design had been tampered with, the motherboard would have failed the myriads of built-in verification processes.

      I already know how they are made, thanks. If you are the company building the boards then you have access, by necessity, to the to design of the boards. If you are also working covertly with a government to modify those boards, you would have the expertise and support available to you to do so successfully. This isn't some script kiddie, this is a nation state we are talking about. They could have entire production facilities at their control where they could build compromised boards and then sneak them back into the supply chain after assembly if they wanted to. I mean what's a small board fab and assembly facility cost to spin up in China, $10-$20 million? It's a government, they could do that easily.

      As for failing verification, not likely. Again: nation state. They will have access to top engineers and intelligence on the QA process the boards would go through.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    53. Re:Apple and Others Respond by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      How would Supermicro know unless they fucked up the modifications and Supermicro started getting boards back and investigated? They aren't going to carefully inspect every passive, x-ray, and rip apart every board that gets made. The first few sure, but after that QA is pretty much an automated process. To get the PCB made and boards assembled requires them to share the designs with the manufacturing partners already. And, as I seem to have to keep reminding people, this isn't some 1337 H4X0r kid we are talking about. This is a government, with nearly unlimited money and engineering resources at its disposal, supposedly modifying hardware built in its borders by third party subcontractors for Supermicro. It's far, far from impossible to do.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    54. Re:Apple and Others Respond by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      If the boards were off the shelf, then they wouldn’t be in Apple or Amazon data centers anyway because they both use custom gear.

      They were video encoding servers, designed by Elemental Technologies (which Amazon later purchased, and according to the story, how the chips were found) and manufactured by Supermicro. So yes, they were off the shelf and yes, they are in Amazon and Apple datacenters. Did you even RTFA? Wait what the hell am I asking, of course not.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  5. And the media blames russia by Kuruk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    China been doing this for years and it's only just coming out.

    1. Re:And the media blames russia by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      China been doing this for years and it's only just coming out.

      Or is it that Bloomberg has been doing this for years and the parties they're talking about are all tired of evidence-free reporting? I don't care about the statement from China's government, because Chinese government. But the people at Apple and Amazon aren't exactly slouches when it comes to dealing thousands of servers and security issues. If thousands of servers were phoning home, they'd know.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:And the media blames russia by jythie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the other hand, knowingly having compromised servers like that would be a PR nightmare, so Apple and Amazon would also have an incentive to say 'everything is fine'. That is what makes stories like this so frustrating... unless the FBI chimes in, everyone is saying pretty much what you would expect to say regardless of if the story is accurate or not.

    3. Re:And the media blames russia by Kuruk · · Score: 1

      A hack this big and on so many servers. The chip hack in question will be hunted for now and found if real. I guess give it a little more time.

    4. Re:And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russians learn to type on pieces of cardboard with keys printed on them, please, it couldn’t have been them.

    5. Re:And the media blames russia by Zocalo · · Score: 2

      Complete lack of any hard evidence to support Bloomberg's claims aside, if you were to take it at face value then you've got to hand the Amazon team some *serious* respect for noticing that there was an additional chip the size of a pencil tip on some of a their server boards that was not present on others or in the design spec. And that's before you consider that they didn't just blow it off and supposedly figured out at least some of the things that it was up to.

      Still not quite as much respect as I'm giving the writer of the piece for coming up with this gem though: "Two of Elemental’s biggest early clients were the Mormon church, which used the technology to beam sermons to congregations around the world, and the adult film industry, which did not.", (beaming of the Missionary Position around the world not withstanding).

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    6. Re:And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FBI chiming in does nothing. Either they confirm the backdoor and China claims they're lying with the intent to sow distrust of Chinese manufacturers or they deny any backdoor has been found and the people claim they're either using the backdoor themselves or are just hiding what they really know and how they found it. Either way, FBI chiming in solves nothing.

    7. Re:And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not about lifting information.

      If a war breaks out, it's about killing machines in datacenters remotely - the chips won't even need a network connection as they likely will just use some RF (radio) transmitted from somewhere to 'activate' them and stop/reset the motherboards from working forever (which could be as simply as simply twiddling the reset forever)

      China is actively moving to a war footing, infiltration of consumer kit is simply one area of getting control of the 'enemy' (which is anyone non-china and russia)

    8. Re:And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eg: If there's a supermicro (or other 'made in china' motherboard as they pretty much *all* are) motherboard in an American/EU/British/etc destroyer, responsible, for AEGIS/etc, and China hits their magic kill switch

      It's fucked destroyer time.

      Got it?

    9. Re:And the media blames russia by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Superficially it sounds dubious... What would this chip do, exactly? It can't magically beam information back to China, it would have to have some kind of network access. That means integration with the network interface, so a connection to some internal bus like PCIe or the Intel peripheral bus. And it would generate traffic that would surely be discovered pretty quickly, especially since everyone has been watching for traffic to/from China as a standard part of intrusion detection.

      Perhaps what they mean is that there is some kind of backdoor somewhere. Some code in the UEFI (which is stored in a flash memory chip, resulting in confused journalists), or some other ROM. Similar to Cisco hardware with their own service backdoors and NSA backdoors, for example. Or like Intel's hidden OS backdoor designed for remote system management.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:And the media blames russia by Jahoda · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The "media" does not blame Russia, my sad little russiapublican trumpist. The entire intelligence apparatus of the United States does. This is why the secret Clinton deep state justice department charged 17 more GRU officers this AM.

    11. Re: And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the recently reported Intel Management Engine left in manufacturing mode.

      It has full access to the network stack and is not visible from the OS. Could even intercept legit traffic and piggyback

    12. Re:And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any evidence for that? Where are the pictures and operating details of these super-secret spying microchips hidden on the motherboards? Again, just baseless accusations from pro-American fed-friendly Bloomberg, which is yet another propaganda tool for America.

    13. Re:And the media blames russia by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      "What would this chip do, exactly?"

      I guess you didn't RTFA?

    14. Re:And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you read the article it says the chip was tied to the BMC, aka the IPMI implementation.

      So in short, if the machine is on the internet, it's susceptible to having a backdoor through it's own IPMI subsystem. Most legitimate data centers already knew about weaknesses in IPMI and put all the IPMI ports behind a VPN. I can't say the same for those who put bare servers on the internet.

      I'd like to know when this started though, because if it's as true as it sounds (nothing in the article really suggests anything far fetched) then ALL data centers need to be scrubbed. That means large gains for Dell and HP, but at the same time, THEY also make their boards in China as well, so we may in fact find the same kind of tampering on their server boards.

      So take the story with a bit of salt, because if this is really as bad as it sounds, then affected networks should see the spurious traffic on their firewalls (you are running a firewall to your corporate network right?)

    15. Re:And the media blames russia by Bongo · · Score: 2

      And who makes the firewall?

    16. Re: And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just dumb, you are not going to get RF through the outside walls of the data center, and through the metal racks and case of the machine.

    17. Re:And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is the expert on "Great Firewalls".

    18. Re: And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the recently reported Intel Management Engine left in manufacturing mode.

      It has full access to the network stack and is not visible from the OS. Could even intercept legit traffic and piggyback

      Russia: The perfect scape goat.

      They have a lot of bright computer people over there and they are capable of using that knowledge for evil. They are all "white males" so we don't offend anybody. Why not? We need to blame somebody for all our problems.

    19. Re:And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China, is that you?

    20. Re: And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats right. Its probably a kill switch. The Chinese obviously watched Battlestar Galactica and saw what the Cylons were able to do.

    21. Re:And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, knowingly having compromised servers like that would be a PR nightmare, so Apple and Amazon would also have an incentive to say 'everything is fine'

      Exactly. Does anyone remember that nasty fiasco with the busted BGA soldering in the 2008 MacBook Pros? If I remember the story correctly, at first Apple denied there was a problem. When the complaints from customers continued to pile up, Apple then blamed NVIDIA who in turn blamed Apple.

      Does anyone remember the bad capacitors on Dell's desktop computers and Dell's silence on the issue?

      Apple has proven that it cannot be trusted when money is on the line and Amazon's cutthroat business tactics also make it a company that cannot be trusted.

    22. Re:And the media blames russia by gosand · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, knowingly having compromised servers like that would be a PR nightmare, so Apple and Amazon would also have an incentive to say 'everything is fine'. That is what makes stories like this so frustrating... unless the FBI chimes in, everyone is saying pretty much what you would expect to say regardless of if the story is accurate or not.

      Not only that, but if it WAS discovered and our government knew, we certainly wouldn't come out and confront China about it. We would have the advantage because we could then provide misinformation to a country that was spying on us.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    23. Re:And the media blames russia by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Complete lack of any hard evidence to support Bloomberg's claims aside, if you were to take it at face value then you've got to hand the Amazon team some *serious* respect for noticing that there was an additional chip the size of a pencil tip on some of a their server boards that was not present on others or in the design spec. And that's before you consider that they didn't just blow it off and supposedly figured out at least some of the things that it was up to.

      According to the article, Amazon saw unexplained network traffic during their due diligence inspections of Elemental's operations, couldn't explain it themselves, but did isolate it to specific machines, and shipped them off to a security firm in Canada to figure them out.

      That Canadian company is the one who deserves serious respect for determining that nothing in the CPU or the OS was anything other than as expected and so the problem must be somewhere on the board. They're the ones who went over those boards literally component by component until they figured out what was going on. Presumably they guessed it was near the IPMI chips, which made the job easier (no mucking around with the CPU's power supply capacitors required), but it's still an impressive feat.

    24. Re:And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not phoning home though. They'll attempt to activate them as they need them. But only after other avenues have been explored.
      China isn't stupid. Besides the leaked NSA ANT playbook contained many similar devices.

      What I want to know is why on earth the US intelligence community hid this since 2015. I'll bet I can tell you.

    25. Re:And the media blames russia by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      You've got two problems with tying a chip to the BMC.

      First the BMC would have to actually accept such a connection, given that it wasn't designed to do so it's unlikely you could.

      Second the BMC has a firmware and software running on it, current draws, commands or anything else that modified the BMC out of spec would cause the BMC to be buggy and would immediately be noticed as it would likely cause the entire board to be buggy.

      This is not a trivial hack they are discussing here. It would need to get through all of SM's quality control. The design modification would need to be invisible to QC/QA. The hardware/software would need to be transparant with no current draws and no bugs or it will be noticed. I doubt even the NSA could do this, they typically just hack the firmwares.

    26. Re:And the media blames russia by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      China been doing this for years and it's only just coming out.

      China has been allegedly doing this for years, and unless Bloomberg actually provide some concrete sources nothing has changed in all these years, it's still only alleged.

    27. Re:And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you believe China is the only country doing this type of hardware hacking (or any hack for that matter)? Like the three letter agencies have so much integrity that they would never ever do such a thing? Did you ever wonder whether it was those very agencies that did it in the first place and if caught, they would have plausible deniability as well as being able to put the blame on China? As Trump once said "you think our country is so innocent?" Think outside the box a little and don't believe everything you read. The people at Bloomberg know every intimate detail of this hack, but they can never get to the bottom of who actually did the hack even though it would be so easy to follow the supply chain back directly to the attacker, but they would never go so far. Why? Because this story leads right back to those three letter agencies right here in the US of A. If caught, just blame China for it. Just because it was built in China doesn't mean they are the only ones to place blame. I'm surprised they didn't blame Russia for it. Now both China and Russia are the boogie men.

    28. Re: And the media blames russia by nnull · · Score: 1

      You try to make it sound like it's practically impossible. I'm not going to name the company or plant here, but there was a whole plant siphoning profits from corporate that no one noticed for years. Every employee in this plant was involved in the scheme and went on for a few years before accounting noticed. The only hint I'll give you, it was in Houston TX.

      Suffice to say, it's entirely trivial to subvert an entire manufacturing plant without anyone noticing for years on end, especially when you have careless and/or disgruntled employees. And knowing Chinese employees, this wouldn't surprise me. You wouldn't need to spend much money to subvert every Chinese employee. Wouldn't surprise me if they even built their own R&D lab right in the factory to do it, with management completely oblivious to what it's for.

    29. Re:And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it at all possible that a back-door is covertly baked into the design, perhaps even a chip, and that this visible part just switches the backdoor on for select boards?

      Alternatively, could this part be somehow designed to flip a specific bit in a specific pattern without too much other interference? I could see this being useful to, for example, change a port or destination address, or even flip a bit that triggers some other change, possibly in the CPU, for example.

    30. Re:And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if the BMC is already compromised, and this component simply enables the backdoor?

    31. Re:And the media blames russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So take the story with a bit of salt, because if this is really as bad as it sounds, then affected networks should see the spurious traffic on their firewalls...

      This is what the article says happened. They further say that the government investigation was able to see more computers communicating with the Chinese control servers, so they know many more computers were compromised than just the ones at Apple and Amazon.

    32. Re:And the media blames russia by Arkham · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, knowingly having compromised servers like that would be a PR nightmare, so Apple and Amazon would also have an incentive to say 'everything is fine'. That is what makes stories like this so frustrating... unless the FBI chimes in, everyone is saying pretty much what you would expect to say regardless of if the story is accurate or not.

      DHS already chimed in.

      https://news.softpedia.com/new...

      --
      - Vincit qui patitur.
  6. China, China, China. by recrudescence · · Score: 1, Informative

    China.

    1. Re:China, China, China. by Bongo · · Score: 1

      Storing it in the wangpan. [1]

      [1] Any Chinese speakers care to confirm that means "cloud filestore" ?

    2. Re:China, China, China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Storing it in the wangpan. [1]

      [1] Any Chinese speakers care to confirm that means "cloud filestore" ?

      Yes, wang3pan2 literally means "net disk",
      and the expression is used to indicate cloud file storage.

  7. Why are your mangement consoles on the Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Article says the hard hack caused the BMC to pull attack code from outside.

  8. Apple and Google Sold Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple sold out to the Chinese government. Of course they're going to say "nothing happened here."

  9. Re:Reporting? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everyone involved on both sides has come out publicly to say Bloomberg is wrong. Why are we still talking about it?

    All parties involved have it in their vested interest to deny this.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  10. Re:Reporting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you mean everyone who has a financial stake in hiding the information... LOL

  11. Function? Position? 6 Pins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The pictures in the article show a 6-pin device. 2 Pins are required for Vss and GND, 4 pins left.

    This chip should be able to manipulate network traffic and alter the operating system? How?

    Where is this chip connected to with its 4 data pins?

    Seriously, come on...

    1. Re:Function? Position? 6 Pins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Everyone look at this yoyo who doesn't understand serial communication.

      Everyone look at this yoyo that doesnt understand 1 wire communication on motherboards.

      Go back to chinese reddit.

    2. Re:Function? Position? 6 Pins? by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you read the article instead of looking at the pictures, you'd know.

      But I'll be kind to the handicapped today.

      The device interacted with the BMC, which has lowest-level access to everything. The device would use the BMC to inject code into memory, allowing remote exploits, and phone home.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    3. Re:Function? Position? 6 Pins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand it either. It does make me wonder how much of the news is blatant lies. It appears that they'll say anything to get people to look at advertisements.

    4. Re:Function? Position? 6 Pins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RS-232 is serial communication ic and requires 16 pins and is a huge ic, and you need to put capacitors and resistors that is very improbably to they fit inside a a chip of these size. if china ic industry is this advanced they don't need to steal anything from your country.

    5. Re: Function? Position? 6 Pins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You idiot, Vss is at GND potential, Vdd is +

    6. Re:Function? Position? 6 Pins? by JamesNorton · · Score: 1

      You can do serial comms with 1 pin (one way communication) using bit-banging. You don't actually need a full UART. Also, who says the other pins aren't SPI or I2C?

    7. Re:Function? Position? 6 Pins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is slow as hell and you still need to manage the data and send it to a bus, so inside that IC you still need some micro-controller to do that witch is impossible for an IC of that size or some software installed in the server to use order the CPU to do that management but if that is the case why not hacking using software only.

    8. Re:Function? Position? 6 Pins? by Tungbo · · Score: 1

      That depends on the BMC having such PSI or I2C interfaces.  Did the Elemental server BMC have such interfaces?
      Given the complexity and cost of such a hack, I would say a firmware hack would have been much simpler and harder to detect.
      Simply code in a weakness in the firmware to allow for external code injection, then you're done.
      It'd be much cheaper and harder to detect.

    9. Re:Function? Position? 6 Pins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Foxxconn motherboard I had for a while had a very odd array of 6 or 8 pin IC's that seemed quite out of place and I always assumed it was hardware for backdoors. There was no bios reset only cmos reset. It was the fishiest board I've ever used.

  12. So stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The U.S. government banned Lenovo some time ago because they don't trust the Chinese. This contractors and company just invite this spying! Any government contractor who did this need to lose their contracts!

  13. Re:Reporting? by Kuruk · · Score: 2

    Why did a Supermicro get kicked off the NASDAQ ?

  14. They deserve what they get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For selling out to China

  15. Stolen data has to be transmitted by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    Let's assume the networking devices were compromised, and they were part of the private intranet on which trade secrets were transmitted. The data still has to be transmitted off of that network somehow. That would certainly raise major flags with these kinds of tech companies. Unless.... it required some physical connection to the device, such as inserting a USB drive to download data directly.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Stolen data has to be transmitted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Access for Chinese Spies as a Service.

    2. Re:Stolen data has to be transmitted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but what if the network compromise was sneakier? What if they only sent partial-word sized bits of data out at a time, only only by modifying the frame padding as the packets pass through a router? Wouldn't that be sneaky?

    3. Re:Stolen data has to be transmitted by squiggleslash · · Score: 0

      This is only a small part of the issues I have about the report. What is the chip monitoring or able to monitor? How is it programmed?

      It's not impossible to envisage something that, say, could monitor Ethernet for a string and use that to program itself, but something that can both see an incoming Ethernet packet and see what the CPU is doing is harder to conceptualize.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Stolen data has to be transmitted by jittles · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is only a small part of the issues I have about the report. What is the chip monitoring or able to monitor? How is it programmed?

      It's not impossible to envisage something that, say, could monitor Ethernet for a string and use that to program itself, but something that can both see an incoming Ethernet packet and see what the CPU is doing is harder to conceptualize.

      I know this is Slashdot but... did you read the article? Supposedly this chip was put on the BMC lines that allow it to modify basically anything going to the CPU. They could have even tweaked the firmware on the board through the BMC. The chip does nothing but detect the loading of the OS and insert instructions that it downloads off of a known host. There was no data exfiltrated as far as anyone can tell. It was just lying dormant or used as a vector to penetrate other areas of the network. They were able to identify the 30 companies affected by monitoring traffic and/or hacking the C&C server used. But it was not detected because, as far as they can tell, the compromised systems themselves were never used to exfiltrate data.

    5. Re:Stolen data has to be transmitted by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      Yes I did, and it doesn't really answer my question, like I said it would have to be sitting on an externally accessible bus, like the Ethernet bus, in order to receive the instructions on what to do. Being able to monitor the operating system loading is next to useless, unless the OS itself is compromised, in which case you have far bigger problems than a 6502 sitting somewhere it shouldn't.

      Which is why I asked where exactly it was. Saying it's on the "BMC lines" is... not an answer.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Stolen data has to be transmitted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having worked on secure AWS systems for sensitive data, if this didn't require physical access, I'd want to know HTF a connection got through the security groups settings and firewall...

    7. Re:Stolen data has to be transmitted by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      So one interesting aspect of this is that these are video encoding servers for streaming video that Bloomberg claims were compromised. Now if I'm a state actor wanting to exfiltrate data that type of application has some interesting possibilities.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    8. Re:Stolen data has to be transmitted by jittles · · Score: 2

      Yes I did, and it doesn't really answer my question, like I said it would have to be sitting on an externally accessible bus, like the Ethernet bus, in order to receive the instructions on what to do. Being able to monitor the operating system loading is next to useless, unless the OS itself is compromised, in which case you have far bigger problems than a 6502 sitting somewhere it shouldn't.

      Which is why I asked where exactly it was. Saying it's on the "BMC lines" is... not an answer.

      Do you know what a BMC does? The lines it is sitting on allows it to modify instructions on the CPU. You can actually use those exact same lines to perform remote hardware debugging through the BMC. And by hardware debugging, I mean anything that happens in the board initialization process after SEC finishes. So PEI onward in a UEFI environment. The BMC also has its own connection to the LAN controller(s) on the PCH. It can be used to power on / off, flash firmware over the SPI bus, interact with the server CPU directly, etc.

    9. Re:Stolen data has to be transmitted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why I asked where exactly it was. Saying it's on the "BMC lines" is... not an answer.

      Don't be dense. BMC via IPMI has network access. That's the point of those systems: inline-management rebranded as sideband-management. If you have a motherboard with that system, it already has unadulterated network, CPU, memory, and firmware access.

      All modern servers have these systems. You seriously though that there is actually a guy in the sever room doing low level management in the age of cloud automaton? Some equipment don't even come with power and reset buttons anymore. Saves money doing it remotely on a few hundred racks.

    10. Re:Stolen data has to be transmitted by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      The BMC has access to EVERYTHING. It can run its own network interface on the main interfaces (called out of band management, the primary feature of BMC's). It can snoop memory, it can control the bios, the hard drives, USB.

      You name it and the BMC is hooked into it at the BIOS level. It's pretty much the only place you could compromise and have something useful. But the ability to insert a chip and still keep the BMC unaware of the addition and keep everything else in spec would be pretty low. It would require a LOT of effort to design and test something and you'd need to do it for every model and you'd need a way to update it because the BMC has an update-able firmware. To survive such an update the device itself would need to be able to be updated, before the BMC update is applied no less as the BMC update could shutdown the communication channel the device relies on.

      Everything about this story is barely plausible. The NSA doesn't do stuff like this because it's easily noticed, quickly disassembled and easy to verify, they do all their compromising for the most part by putting modified firmwares on existing parts. Where it's impossible to stumble on and it can be concealed in the existing firmware.

    11. Re:Stolen data has to be transmitted by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Not all data has to move for a mission in the USA.
      Moving data shows an interest in something.
      The other win is just getting deep into complex networks at any time for any reason. The ability to look and search in real time without getting noticed.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    12. Re: Stolen data has to be transmitted by nnull · · Score: 2

      The NSA doesn't have access to most manufacturing plants. Chinese government does. My visit to China to see my friend recently who owns large swatches of buildings with some big name manufacturers, allowed me to waltz in anyone's plant despite "Intellectual Property" (Landlord has some huge privileges in China). Because of his government connections, no one dared question him or me why I was in there taking pictures. No one is going to dare report it happening to the affected companies either that I was in there. In fact, they were concerned more about my safety of anything happening to me than worrying about your IP. Anyone that thinks their data or product design is safe in China are either lying through their teeth or just completely oblivious to reality.

      So, possibility of this happening in China to me is highly likely, because every employee there is easily bribed, manipulated or threatened. They could build an R&D lab and additional manufacturing line just for this purpose right in the plant without letting them know. Stuff the NSA could only dream of.

    13. Re: Stolen data has to be transmitted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My visit to China to see my friend recently who owns large swatches of buildings with some big name manufacturers

      >Yeah, bullshit. You have a "friend" in China who's a billionaire.
      Maybe you should move to China comrade.
      NVM, you have a "friend" who's a billionaire period.
      Rich people hang with other rich people comrade.

      >How many "big name manufacturers" can you name "rents" their factory space? I'll wait.

    14. Re:Stolen data has to be transmitted by starman97 · · Score: 1

      The one thing I've yet to see is one of these devices.
      If they got into the supply chain and made a production run of boards with these parts, there should be hundreds if not thousands of modified boards in multiple datacenters. Surely some engineer or tech has a failed or spare board in a box somewhere that has this part on it. If there was such a purge of servers once this became known, people would have talked by now, or someone would know and again have an old one or a lab board that they could pull this part off of. Getting into the supply chain at the board house is a single point, but the back end of where those boards went, that's hundreds of people.

      As to where you'd put the device, another place would be between the management PHY and the BMC , the AST2400 otherwise connects to the Southbridge
      https://www.aspeedtech.com/pro...
      You'd not going to have direct access to the CPU there.

      IMO a 'Plausible' hack, but until someone can produce one of these 'spy filter' chips, I'm not buying it.

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
  16. Snipe hunt 600 designs says find boards with it? by aisnota · · Score: 1

    Ok, with that many designs and older machines end of life, find some free machines to locate said chip.

    If you find examples, post the results here so truth be known.

    It is hard to imagine that a few of these motherboards are not scattered into used server bin areas around the United States.

    Perhaps we may think that 600 designs without proper over sight is too many to review for cyber security.

    Quality assurance failed to notice or was complicit with an extra chip from visual inspection?

    Anybody find it? If so your first discovery may be bounty material for news outlets or security mavens out there.

    --
    http://www.aisnota.com/slashdot/ Welcome to Logic and the Future
  17. Would you trust the FBI? by aepervius · · Score: 0

    I would not trust anything coming from the FBI or NSA or the US at the moment... Because talk is cheap and the US is NOT trustable now (it may not have been under previous president, but trump and co smeared it on our face until we could not breath the stink). Evidences are king. A photo of the chip as well as decoded code , or micrography of it with evidence of concealment and data transfer would go a long way toward that. until then it is just as much hot air.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Would you trust the FBI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but Comey also torpedoed Clinton at zero-hour which added fuel to Trump's "Lock Her Up" mantra and ultimately helped him get elected thanks to "the lesser of two evils" stupidity. Comey was "good people" until the moment he tampered with Trump's Reality Distortion Field and suddenly he was public enemy number one.

    2. Re:Would you trust the FBI? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those cards turn up on eBay for peanuts, and TFA identifies the location of the chip. It should be possible to get one.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Would you trust the FBI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Comey torpedo Clinton's campaign? Or did Clinton torpedo it herself when she decided to store classified documents on an unsecured, personal server?

    4. Re:Would you trust the FBI? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      WOW.

      Mod parent +1 informative.

    5. Re:Would you trust the FBI? by Kuruk · · Score: 1

      Totally agree a hack of this size. There must be physical hardware that are being hunted and tested by the White and Black hats now.

    6. Re: Would you trust the FBI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was never hacked, yet the secure white house network was. As were many others under "secure" management. You really need to do better decision making between a learned lesson with no known hacks with captain cheetos who outs allied spies, denounces country's own security forces to be Putin's cock holster.

      Seriously, your logic is garbage.

    7. Re:Would you trust the FBI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ebay Link? I searched for "those cards" but I got lots of hits.....

  18. I smell a lawsuit by Holi · · Score: 1

    Bloomberg better have evidence to back the claims they made against Supermicro.
    Since Amazon has said that reports of it finding a chip or working with the FBI are false it does not look good for Bloomberg.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    1. Re:I smell a lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just look for Bloomberg employees who shorted Supermicro stock recently.

    2. Re:I smell a lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if there is no lawsuit, what does that tell you?

      (That was the rhetorical, but here's the answer: Somebody would prefer to keep the details out of a courtroom.)

  19. Re:Reporting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I really though they just messed up their reporting.. It must suck to be in the Supermicro management at this point.

  20. Re:Reporting? by Zocalo · · Score: 2

    Auditing revealling financial irregularities that led to delayed SEC filings that predated even the earliest claims made in the Bloomberg article - ultimately it was about breaching SEC filing requirements, rather than the underlying financial issues, that led to the delisting.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  21. I'd like to hear facts by Gabest · · Score: 1

    Every company denies, anon informants, no one from FBI interviewed.

  22. Back up your claims by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where'd the chips come from? They are physical things that exist. Do you think Bloomberg faked the paper trail all the way up the supply chain (..)

    Bloomberg says A, Apple, Amazon etc say B. That's where you need to back up your claim.

    If Bloomberg did its job, it should have some expert(s) on call that can tell you what motherboard, what chip / where on the board, what pinout, what it does, and how they arrived at those findings. That's the core of their story after all.

    If Bloomberg does, just publish those technical details & call it a day. If Bloomberg doesn't, then yes they are talking out of their nose and Apple, Amazon & co have every right to criticize them.

    1. Re: Back up your claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that it mentions the secrecy of the investigation. Any "expert" willing to testify about the matter is likely risking criminal lawsuit.

    2. Re:Back up your claims by dataxtream · · Score: 1

      Show me the chip!

    3. Re:Back up your claims by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1, Troll

      Bloomberg says A, Apple, Amazon etc say B.

      Amazon lied in their testimony about what "letting the smoke out" means. Are you really so naive as to think it really means that the employees who assembled it, were given frequent bong breaks? No, dammit. Just check urban dictionary and you'll see that it's a term for a broken computer. And please, when Apple started crying about how their reputation is ruined, they were totally distracting you from their assertion that "When I said 'all our computers are cracked' I was talking about microfractures on the rubber legs on the bottom of the case." OMFG, you believe this shit, really?!

      I, for one, found Bloomberg's testimony credible. Bloomberg might not remember exactly when the machines got cracked and then the smoke got let out, but clearly something happened and if Amazon is going to obviously lie about it then that just makes it easier to decide who to believe.

      After the current round of POs get filled, I'm going to recommend we exclude any more Amazon and Apple purchases. You just wait until next month when it's time for the new purchase orders. We aren't going to tolerate having a vendor like that in our supply chain anymore. Our company is better than that, and we're finally going to stand up for ourselves.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    4. Re:Back up your claims by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2

      Tough crowd!

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    5. Re: Back up your claims by nnull · · Score: 1

      As if we have reason to trust Apple ever since they started working with China.

    6. Re: Back up your claims by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      I'm no fan of Apple or Amazon, but what vendor exactly are you going with that you presume is better?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  23. Follow the stock price... by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, Super Micro stock has fallen nearly 36%. Anyone buying?

    1. Re:Follow the stock price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "them" was referring to the "we" you claim is tired, Chris. Perhaps you're retarded?

    2. Re:Follow the stock price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Retarded is APK who is more than willing to prove it daily.

    3. Re:Follow the stock price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and we really enjoyed reading about your shit back in '16.

      https://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9144549&cid=52169375

      Have you seen a child psychologist about your issues?

    4. Re:Follow the stock price... by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm not Chris. I shit gold bricks, not soft yogurt.

    5. Re:Follow the stock price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're not the original Christopher Dale Reimer? Huh, must just be a strange coincidence. So what trolls are you referring to, since you're not Chris? You know, Slashdot's favorite self-flagellating professional victim?

    6. Re:Follow the stock price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, yeah, yeah, Chris we already know about this opinion of yours, you posted it one thousand times all over the Internet. You definitely need to get that problem of yours cured or, at least, under control.

      P.S. You can't imagine how much you helped me to perfect my English. Thanks for that! I guess that instead of doing a double-take, I did a double-prank for those who wondered what I could possibly gain!

      Cheers buddy!

      Reference: creimer twitter account and Slashdot comments linked below for more info:
      https://twitter.com/cdreimer
      https://slashdot.org/comments....
      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      Figure Out G.E.D. Question From Hot Ones Truth or Dab with Kevin Hart

      PRODUCTS FEATURED IN THIS VIDEO
      Star Wars Galactic Empire Reversible Bucket Hat (affiliate link) https://amzn.to/2sWHbT2

      HOW THIS VIDEO WAS MADE
      Video recorded with an Apple iPhone 6s and MoviePro Camera app. Edited with Movavi Video Editor Plus.

      Apple iPhone 6s (affiliate link)
      https://amzn.to/2IZP9AT

      MoviePro Camera (affiliate link)
      https://www.youtube.com/redire...

      Movavi Video Editor Plus 14 Personal Edition (affiliate link)
      http://amzn.to/2FkOXe2

      GAMING/VIDEO EDITING PC AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core AM3 Processor (affiliate link)
      https://amzn.to/2kLhO2T

      Gigabyte AM3+ GA-78LMT-USB3 Micro ATX Motherboard (affiliate link)
      https://amzn.to/2JaDVhB 4 x G.Skill 2GB DDR3 1333 (8GB total)

      Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti Windforce OC 4GB GDDR5 128-bit Video Card (affiliate link)
      https://amzn.to/2JtHoaE

      2 x Adata 120GB SSDs (affiliate link)
      https://amzn.to/2Lj24ze

      HGST 1TB 7200 RPM 2.5" Hard Drive (affiliate link)
      https://amzn.to/2LVAJnH

      Cool Master N200 Micro-ATX Case (affiliate link)
      https://amzn.to/2LkSuvU

      DiabloTek 500W PSU Acer 24" 1920 x 1080 Monitor (affiliate link)
      https://amzn.to/2sz8Da7

      Microsoft Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 (affiliate link)
      https://amzn.to/2Js1AcP

      Logitech M100 Mouse (affiliate link)
      https://amzn.to/2stcq8C

      Logitech C920 Web Cameera (affiliate link)
      https://amzn.to/2sriEWC

    7. Re:Follow the stock price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, you see a user called "__aaclcg7560" and you think of Chris? Very very strange.

    8. Re:Follow the stock price... by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 1

      CDR = commander

    9. Re:Follow the stock price... by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 0

      The reply to everyone of my comments is Chris, Chris, Chris. I commented on someone's story submission and the Cult of Chris follows me around on Slashdot.

    10. Re:Follow the stock price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but I wasn't referring to your comment, I was referring to the fact that YOU said "Chris"! You're using creimer logic here, oh mysterious stranger who totally isn't 400 pounds of virgin failure at 1919.

    11. Re:Follow the stock price... by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 0

      I said Chris because I know you're a member of the Cult of Chris. Don't deny it. Chris died for your sins.

    12. Re:Follow the stock price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean "cum"mander, Chris? CROFL

    13. Re:Follow the stock price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they don't renew your national government IT contract, I guess you'll be part of the street-defecating homeless in California. Except your shit might just cause California to finally snap at the San Andreas fault and float off into the Pacific.

      Best case, other homeless will gather your mounds, dry them in the sun, and burn them in the winter for heat.

    14. Re:Follow the stock price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried embracing Chris but he's so wide my hands didn't meet!

      (Plus the smell! Yikes!)

  24. Re:Welcome to Trump Land! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a weird name for a chink.

  25. Turn About by Luthair · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Remember when the USA did the same thing?

    1. Re:Turn About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Da, comrade.

    2. Re:Turn About by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not to electronics sold inside the US. And, since that's where I buy my electronics, that's what I care about.

      Also, you know, I'd rather the US have my data than the Chinese. I'd prefer neither, but between the two, definitely the US.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:Turn About by Holi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why? You live in the US, Te US has a lot more options on ways to misuse your data in ways that could have far more impact on your life. What exactly could China do to you, an American citizen?

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    4. Re:Turn About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to electronics sold inside the US

      I think it's so sweet that you believe that and trust them!

    5. Re:Turn About by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      fuck off xiang

    6. Re:Turn About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I don't know, fuck with us economically on a large scale so they can spread their totalitarian influence globally with far less resistance?

    7. Re:Turn About by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Not the same, the NSA based on the information that's been leaked didn't insert hardware as that would be way to easily noticed, verified, disassembled and countered. The NSA put their exploits in custom firmware's images that looked and behaved just like the real thing and could survive firmware updates.

      Even if you knew you had a compromised device the only way you could even verify it was to hook into the firmware electrically and dump the entire image to external media where you could analyze it. And even then you might not even be able to verify what the exploit did.

    8. Re:Turn About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously.

      I trust my own country 1000x more than China, or frankly any other country, I dont consider trust in my gov't very high.

      When was the last time one of our actresses went missing due to taxes?
      When was the last time you needed a "porn pass" to view online porn?
      When's the last time you were jailed for criticizing the government? Or for making fun of someone online in poor taste?
      When was the last time you were told you couldn't own the land your home was on?

      Anti-American fodder was once a healthy, self-deprecating introspective exercise... it's still useful, but now it's mostly a tool to identify gullible idiots.

    9. Re:Turn About by dristoph · · Score: 1

      Came here to say this. As a typical US citizen, if some government is going to have access to my data, why wouldn't I prefer one that doesn't have jurisdiction where I live? On the other hand, a US company would obviously prefer the US government have their data, because the US government is generally interested in maintaining and extending the influence of US enterprise abroad; which isn't to say that the state wouldn't misuse the data (perhaps sharing it with domestic competitors in backroom deals?), but you'd be far less likely to suddenly have foreign competitors suddenly pop up with your trade secrets fully developed.

    10. Re:Turn About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a European I'd rather have the US have my data than China.

    11. Re:Turn About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, China isn't oppressing ME m80

    12. Re: Turn About by nnull · · Score: 1

      I prefer neither. One could have me killed, the other put in a super max prison.

    13. Re:Turn About by Luthair · · Score: 1

      You're being pedantic, in both cases governments were compromising electronics being shipped to people and places they wanted to spy on. People aren't outraged here about the way China compromised devices, they're outraged that China was compromising devices to spy.

    14. Re:Turn About by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      As China gets more and more intermeshed with the US economy, the ways are increasing dramatically. I mean, Google can probably fuck with my life more than the government (not than the government could but what the government would). But, to answer your question, what do you think will happen when, e.g. Bank of America agrees to implement world-wide social credit scores to access Chinese customers.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    15. Re:Turn About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overseas incidents are harder to chase down and prosecute. It would be trivial to grab credit card, login details if you had BMC access.

  26. China=EVIL COMMUNISTS by WCMI92 · · Score: 0

    Acting evil. Need I say more? And I will get modded down to -5 because liberal fascists are so fascist.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:China=EVIL COMMUNISTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is sure EVIL, but anything but COMMUNISTS.
      AND real communists aren't evil. CAPITALISTS are. China is both evil and capitalist, in addition to being a REGIME. What China is not is a communist country. For at least 50 years now.

  27. Pics? How to ID the chip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asking for a friend.

  28. Where is the technical evidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Classified my ass. Intel's ME engine is much bigger and more complicated. It is not super secret to name the alleged ping address and IDS sigs. Stray pings would be a dead giveaway - highly unlikely.The photo looks like 6 pins -so a bus based execution it is not. A decent designer would use it to leverage flaws in the ME chip, and steal/bypass signing keys, and/or alter CPU flags.This would suggest ME and Spectre and Meltdown and TB lookasides were known to state actors for a very long time, and the fix is more complicated than disabling the chip. Revealing it now, suggests that future CPU firmware errata could be tampered with. Which implies our overlords do not want us disabling ME and firmware upgrades. Now why is that so?

  29. Bloomberg starts the charge against China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is just another bullshit attempt at attacking China because they dominate a large market, namely mother- and server-boards. It's funny because nothing of what they claim has ever been proven, but we have numerous cases where it has been revealed this is exactly what the American counterparts Cisco and Juniper etc. are doing.

  30. 20 year old news... by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 2

    What? You're just now learning about it and act all surprised...please.

    There was never any question what price U.S. manufacturer's were willing to pay outsourcing to Asia. It was just a question how long.

    Apple et. al. are not stupid clucks, they went over motherboards with a microscope. They saw exactly how true to their design finished goods matched. Amazon paid a 3rd party due diligence and its public. SO, we have the answer now.

    1. Re:20 year old news... by quintus_horatius · · Score: 1

      Apple et. al. are not stupid clucks, they went over motherboards with a microscope. They saw exactly how true to their design finished goods matched. Amazon paid a 3rd party due diligence and its public. SO, we have the answer now.

      Please. Do you think that each and every motherboard was inspected this way? Just one company called out in the article, Elemental, ordered thousands of units. After they confirm that the units are up to spec they're not going to continue any deep inspection.

      If you read the article, you'll notice that much of the deception happened when an overloaded factory sub-contracted the work; the sub-contractors were coerced into varying from the design and inserting the chips. A subset of motherboards containing chips so small that they can be embedded into the plastic backing of the motherboard itself will not be noticed on a basic visual or photo inspection.

    2. Re:20 year old news... by Walter+White · · Score: 1

      Apple et. al. are not stupid clucks, they went over motherboards with a microscope.

      Are you certain about that? Can you provide a citation that backs that up?
      I'm sure that Apple goes over their products that carefully, but they are not selling Supermicro boards. It is more likely that they are providing a specification that details what they want (and hopefully a set of test specifications it must meet) and then asking for quotes.

    3. Re:20 year old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they don't have psychics working on this, they're not really trying!

  31. So... by argStyopa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...let's hear more from people whinging about Trump's 'trade war' with China.

    China's been a shitty actor on the world stage since they bred themselves out of irrelevancy.

    Foreign companies have to establish a Chinese business, owned 51% by Chinese who almost always end up being a front for the PLA.
    Draconian censorship laws. No free speech. No freedom of religion.
    Currency manipulation and disregard for norms of international economic (and other) reporting.
    Military occupation and absorption of neighbors it deems "were *actually* China anyway".
    Sorry Hong Kongers, I guess you don't get to keep democracy and nobody cares...
    An arbitrary, dangerously confrontational foreign policy including sweeping territorial claims.
    Environmental destruction with impunity. ...and yet we should curry their favor so we can keep buying $9 folding chairs?

    I don't like Donald Trump for a number of reasons, but the US confrontation with China is LONG past due; waiting any longer would likely make it military when China finally gets brazen enough to try to grab Taiwan.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...let's hear more from people whinging about Trump's 'trade war' with China.

      China's been a shitty actor on the world stage since they bred themselves out of irrelevancy.

      This is hilarious considering that the US have been doing the same spying-through-Cisco-gears for years.

      There is no actor on the world stage more “shitty” than the US.

    2. Re:So... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Let's not confuse trade issues with espionage issues. There is some overlap, but even if we had fully balanced trade (no trade deficit), industrial and military espionage would still happen on a similar scale.

    3. Re:So... by gtall · · Score: 1

      There's stupid confrontation with China and then there is intelligent confrontation with China. Trump's is the stupid kind by giving the Chinese rump government the tools with which to fight back. And pissing off the U.S. allies, screwing up other trade agreements, etc. is not a recipe for successfully countering Chinese aggression.

    4. Re:So... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      China has freedom of religion.
      Perhaps you want to check their constitution, it is easy to google.

      China is not manipulating its currency, it is bound to the US dollar since decades.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:So... by swb · · Score: 2

      Trump's public confrontation with China may be stupid, but my assumption is he lacks the mental horsepower to actually decide what specific sanctions/tariffs should be imposed in this little dustup.

      My guess is the actual technical details are the brainchild of people who have a deeper understanding of the Chinese economy and its vulnerabilities and they are more measured and strategic than simply slapping tariffs on stuff because it says "made in China". The people coming with specific tariffs have likely done their homework and min-maxed the tariffs to minimize harm to US interests and maximize the pain China feels.

      It's also possible that even with good analytical insight and strategy it may be compromised by political considerations -- corporate supporters Trump doesn't want to alienate getting an exception, for example, but this is different than simply overall bad punitive strategy.

      We've been hearing for years (decades?) now about how the Chinese economy has a bunch of systemic vulnerabilities and that lots of their positive economic data is flat-out fake or pumped up so bad it might as well be fiction. My guess would be the tariffs are designed to aggravate these systemic problems in addition to trying to hobble specific industries that might be too competitive.

    6. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you some sort of Chinese troll farm shill, or just an idiot?

    7. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taiwan is a bunch of royal pussies that got beaten and ran away. From their island, they seek to re-establish rule over the mainland.

    8. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello in there. Yes you. Hello in that cave had of yours.

      The SPECIFIC way the Chinese are accused of conducting mass compromise of US businesses abroad and possibly here in the US is due to the fact they have gained control of targeted companies with particular technological ability. You know, like INFORMATION SYSTEMS.

      So what if a backwards China tried to spy a bit just like everyone else. This is different. This is controlling the technology required to do business and then using that control to compromise the business.

      This has NOTHING to do with trade balance and everything to do with targeted control by China and the resulting compromise of US interests.

      ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID? Probably not. You are more likely just disingenuous.

    9. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lol, tell that to the Uyghurs...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyghurs

    10. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Military occupation and absorption of neighbors it deems "were *actually* white European anyway". Sorry Sitting Bull, I guess you don't get to keep democracy and nobody cares...

      Like the entire United States isn't stolen land.

    11. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like Russia. Why that sounds like Russia?

    12. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What China says and what China does are two different things. As far as I can tell China has been acting that way for millenia.

    13. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "China has freedom of religion."

      So much freedom that China reserves the right to determine who is the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama and who is a Roman Catholic Bishop in the country.

      http://tibet.net/2017/05/china-and-the-reincarnation-of-the-dalai-lama/
      https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vatican-asks-legitimate-chinese-bishops-to-step-down-in-favor-of-communist

    14. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is the actual technical details are the brainchild of people who have a deeper understanding of the Chinese economy and its vulnerabilities and they are more measured and strategic than simply slapping tariffs on stuff because it says "made in China".

      Nope. Evidence: Trumps tax plan was primarily for corporations, who in a competitive environment, will reduce price when taxes are reduced. The actual plan was a huge giveaway to the wealthy, because the people who wrote the plan were looking to their constituents (donors). We have no idea if the tariffs were influenced by the BBB who refuses to be transparent about whether their donors are US or Chinese or Russian corporations. So we don't know if they are actually in US interests. Besides tariffs are freaking complicated to analyze and I haven't seen the horsepower in the White House to actually do the analysis. They can't seem to keep their good people.

    15. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

    16. Re: So... by nnull · · Score: 1

      The only difference here. We found the NSA spying unacceptable. But for some reason we know about Chinese spying but find it acceptable.

    17. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are jealous they make better stuff.

    18. Re:So... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      This has NOTHING to do with trade balance

      Thank you for confirming my point.

    19. Re: So... by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      On the subjecr of environment they try to present themselves as valid climate change fighting players. With one hand....

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    20. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this drivel 5 insightful?

      Foreign companies don't have to do that, complete fabrication.

      You are completely freee from having to fake a religion to blend in with the god botherers.

      They don't manipulate their currency any more than any other country does.

      HongKong never had democracy before anynway. They are all Chinese, why should they get it when the rest don't?

      You are smoking crack if you think China even holds a candle to American imperialism abroad.

      America pollutes at twice the rate per person that China does.

      The fact so many people voted you up clearly shows how shallow and idiotic this site has become.

  32. Re:Elementals CEO died suddenly of a heart attack by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    He was 41 and a marathon runner. He was probably killed off by his ChiCom overlords.

    Most definitely suspicious -- middle-aged marathon runners never die of sudden heart attacks.

  33. Manufacturing consent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still remember all the WMD that the US Army found in Iraq, those weapons were everywhere in Iraq even in the toilets.
    Because governments NEVER EVER LIE, if the government wants to initiate a conflict with another country, it can do it without lying.

  34. The real problem... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know to what degree "China" (it's government, it's people, or it's corporations, state owned or otherwise) are spying, but I do know it's not 0, not even close to 0. I have been close to accusations and convictions, they are absolutely spying using any available means. That's not surprising. If it made any sense to do it, adding stray hardware/software to a PC is definitely a viable approach to compromising it.

    The real issue is technical. How do we create a secure compute environment? Apple has taken the route on its phones of building a very effective and secure trust chain. It is pretty hard for an unauthorized user to slip in stray firmware on their phones, I don't want to say impossible because there are some known and pretty exotic exploits. But very hard. Their design is such that even their MFGs cannot sneak in stray code to spy on you. The weakest point is still the single authorized user, and their ability to protect their passwords and biometrics. Apple's route also makes you, the owner, a perpetual customer rather than an owner. If they choose to lock you out, there's nothing you can do about it, your $1k phone is a paperweight.

    PCs (I'm including desktops, servers and laptops) on the other hand are pretty much a free for all. The MFG can sneak on just about anything in their BIOS/EFI implementation, and anyone up and down the chain can do so without much oversight. It's a pretty open and competitive market, with many small players of little to no account, all trying to make the sale. Each of them provides their own hardware, and some EFI implementation they probably bought and then tailored to their implementation. Someone could also have added backdoors. That in turn hands off to my choice of OSes, which themselves could easily be compromised and I wouldn't know better until something happened. I am unquestionably the owner of this system, and can do anything I would like, but I also cannot rely on anything up and down the system. I'm the owner of a very leaky boat.

    What we need is a system that can both be trustworthy and robust to middle-man attackers who may, at times, have direct hardware access, but still allows me to be the absolute owner of my hardware. I may make bad choices, those bad choices may compromise my system, but I need a foolproof way of knowing when I'm making a bad choice. It's not that easy of a problem in the current ecosystem, and we're waiting for someone to get caught doing something bad that forces our hand.

    1. Re:The real problem... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      If they choose to lock you out, there's nothing you can do about it, your $1k phone is a paperweight.

      Umm... except sue.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real issue is technical.

      No it is not. This is 100% classic abuse and subterfuge. The only proper response is to stop buying Supermicro's products. A total import ban may be in order.

      Let them go bankrupt. It does not even matter if they were in on it or not. It happened on their watch.
      Maybe the next company will have better security and quality control, and not be on Beijing's leash as much.
      And China too should learn that they are risking their companies very existence with shenanigans like this..

      This is the kind of thing were we actually need the Trump approach.

    3. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Can't even do that - the first thing you do when the iPhone turns on is agree to a clickwrap license where you give up your right to sue and agree to binding arbitration with an arbiter of Apple's choosing. This same agreement also lets Apple remotely brick your phone with no recourse.

    4. Re:The real problem... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying we shouldn't let them burn. I'm saying there's nothing stopping their next competitor from doing exactly the same thing, better.

    5. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes there is. It is a great deterrent to know that your company will be dead, and that the entire management will be internationally wanted and prosecuted on serious criminal charges, with all their assets being ceased.

      Hell, just add some mysterious early deaths for those cases that do not surrender themselves. I'm sure we can find something to justify it.

    6. Re:The real problem... by Anonymice · · Score: 1

      Trusted Platform Module (TPM)

      Although TPM only addresses some of the concerns. It's only useful for detecting hardware interference post-installation, and only as long as the manufacturer doesn't leak the burned-in keys - but that's not something that could ever be easily solved, short of fabricating everything in-house.

      "Anyone with access to the private endorsement key would be able to forge the chip's identity and break some of the security that the chip provides. Thus, the security of the TPM relies entirely on the manufacturer and the authorities in the country where the hardware is produced."

    7. Re:The real problem... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      The real issue is technical. How do we create a secure compute environment?

      Starting with simplicity. The simplest CPU is really a very small thing. College students reimplement the MIPS instruction set on a regular basis. It's possible to know what literally every transistor is for in the chip design, build that system on a chip, and use it as the fundamental building blocks of your system. Even if everything else you purchase is suspicious, you can be absolutely certain of one device on your network. You probably can't fabricate the chip yourself, but since you know it inside and out, you can test it, independently, and verify it only ever does what you expect it to do. You also probably can't fabricate the carrier board for it, but you can probably design a single layer board to host it which is 100% visually and electrically auditable. Then you can add all the components to it yourself. The Maker movement has made solder paste a cheap off-the-shelf product, and you can buy a toaster oven anywhere.

      The result won't be fast, and won't be running any Microsoft operating system, but you didn't want to do that anyway.

    8. Re:The real problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lock the user out Platform Module (TPM)

      FTFY.

      In short you're missing the fallacy. You can't completely lock out someone who has physical access. Especially when that person is the person building the device A.K.A lock. Period. End of story.

      This means what the GP wants is impossible to create unless the person using the device is also the person who creates it. You can come close to it, but physical access will always trump whatever software protection you may build in to the design. It's just a matter of time and resources.

      To those idiots out there that sit on an armchair and declare that "it must be possible": You have no idea how computers work. Quit making stupid claims about shit that you know nothing about. You wanna make claims? Quit being ignorant and go study up on Computer Science and Information Theory. When you've done that, and you can prove that you've done so, then you can show us your proofs on how protecting a device from someone with physical access to it can be done. Pro Tip: External interference, like a guy with a gun, is admitting defeat.

  35. BusinessWeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No evidence, fake news, reporters are not scientists or engineers and both companies have plenty of top employees.

    Who really thinks Amazon and Apple are both lying? Nobody.

  36. And the responses from Apple/Amazon/Supermicro.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the responses from Amazon, Apple, and Supermicro, they are pretty damning. This is as close to outright calling Bloomberg liars as I have seen in a long time.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-10-04/the-big-hack-amazon-apple-supermicro-and-beijing-respond

    Having personally dealt with the company on similar things, I have a far dimmer view of their ethics than the above piece, I have personally seen them ignore direct contrary evidence to a story from the source in order to run a high profile piece. Someone should be fired for this.

              -Charlie

  37. Who said anything about Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Supermicro doesn't have any motherboards made in Russia.

  38. Joker Products! by Zorro · · Score: 1

    The Joke is You Probably Already Bought Them!

    Https://www.youtube.com/embed/cROY4m4Ftiw

  39. We have been doing this for decades... by mutherhacker · · Score: 1

    Oh, right! When we do it we're spreading freedom whereas when they do it it's malicious!

  40. Explain to me... by The-Forge · · Score: 1

    Ok, explain this to me...

    How is a single chip on a motherboard going to do the following and do it without someone noticing:

    1: Intercept data on the server without knowledge of what OS is running and/or without a driver to facilitate OS access?

    2: Send that data to some 3rd party, through a firewall, without the bandwidth usage being noticed?

    I know someone is going to answer #1 by saying "it'll just send everything in memory / traveling over the bus", but then you wind up hitting #2 because that would use a crap ton of bandwidth.

    This looks very improbable and much like another "China is the boogeyman" story. I want hard proof before I believe this. The hysteria around this is like BadUSB all over again, and we all know where that went.

    1. Re:Explain to me... by b0bby · · Score: 2

      Assuming the article is correct:
      1. They were connected to the baseboard management controller (BMC) - so they were basically opening up the IPMI
      2. My takeaway would be that you could use small command and control which would be very hard to spot, then make other changes which could exfiltrate only the data you were interested in.

    2. Re:Explain to me... by Jfetjunky · · Score: 1

      The story is compelling, and while there is no part of me that would believe for a second China doesn't want to steal every piece of IP they could get their hands on, on the face this looks and sounds like movie plot stuff.
      While it sounds super scary to "plant a chip" and "have a backdoor", the actual physical implementation isn't so straightforward. The IC shown is very small. It seems very unlikely that there just happen to be all the necessary PCB traces all grouped together so that a tiny little IC can bridge across them and do what it needs to do. Even if there was some clever way to run it with parasitic power. Which kind of makes it seem that the PCB itself would have been modified to accept this super secret chip. Which means either Supermicro contracted out the entire mfg process (aka, here are the pcb design files, you order the boards and put the parts on there), or somebody underwent a HUGE undertaking to redesign the PCB in secret and insert it into the supply chain so the IC could be put on. If I was Supermicro, I would have probably had the pcb design separately contracted, built, and shipped to the assembler. High speed digital needs rigorous design and specification of the pcb material stackup and trace tuning to ensure signal integrity. The company I work for would not trust that to a contract manufacturer.
      Maybe there are details missing that make it all clear. But without them, it still seems a bit far-fetched.

    3. Re:Explain to me... by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      Without pouring through the article again for references, the article made it sound like there were spies(tm) that infiltrated Supermicro. Having people like that on the inside would make it much easier to surreptitiously insert a spot for a part. And if the purpose of the device is originally designed to provide signal conditioning between the boot prom and the baseboard management controller it wouldn't take nearly as significant of an effort.

    4. Re:Explain to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Which means either Supermicro contracted out the entire mfg process (aka, here are the pcb design files, you order the boards and put the parts on there), or somebody underwent a HUGE undertaking to redesign the PCB in secret and insert it into the supply chain so the IC could be put on

      or 3. Supermicro was directly involved at the behest of the Chinese government, and the story about subcontractors being pressured into cooperating is hooey.

    5. Re:Explain to me... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      How is a single chip on a motherboard going to do the following and do it without someone noticing:

      1: Intercept data on the server without knowledge of what OS is running and/or without a driver to facilitate OS access?

      2: Send that data to some 3rd party, through a firewall, without the bandwidth usage being noticed?

      The entire point of this article is that traffic was noticed. Amazon wanted to buy Elemental. Amazon was auditing Elemental. Amazon's auditors found unexplained network traffic. Not very much of it, but they found some. And in the process of trying to explain it, somebody got very intrigued, and shipped off the servers that were sending unexplained packets to a security firm in Canada, and that's how Bloomberg has a story to write about. The data was noticed.

      There's a reason why US spy agencies prefer wireless. First because historically that's all there was, but also because of this. Any good sysadmin knows what traffic is flowing on their network, and notices traffic that's not supposed to be there.

  41. surprise, fucking surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't we just nuke them? Hell, we could probably pay Russia to do it.

  42. Glad trump is in office by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I expect that trump will push major changes in the west over this. And yes, it is time to get control back due to security issues.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Glad trump is in office by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Seriously, I expect that trump will push major changes in the west over this.

      He’s already tweeted that affected companies should pick up and move their manufacturing to Russia.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Glad trump is in office by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      ROFL!!!

      I never have mod points when I would just LOVE to have mod points. You'd be getting one for really, truly making me laugh out loud over that!

      Thanks for brightening my day.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  43. So has the United States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why we need open-source hardware:

    https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/photos-of-an-nsa-upgrade-factory-show-cisco-router-getting-implant/

  44. Refute or deny? by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    It sounds to me like the corporations named denied the report. They're a long, long way from refuting it.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  45. What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bloomberg published responses from the companies involved. Here are some excerpts that give you a sense of how they responded...

    Amazon:

    It’s untrue that AWS knew about a supply chain compromise, an issue with malicious chips, or hardware modifications when acquiring Elemental. It’s also untrue that AWS knew about servers containing malicious chips or modifications in data centers based in China, or that AWS worked with the FBI to investigate or provide data about malicious hardware. [...]

    And they go on to say a lot more that categorically denies Bloomberg's claims while making a mention of an unrelated firmware incident from 2016.

    Apple:

    Over the course of the past year, Bloomberg has contacted us multiple times with claims, sometimes vague and sometimes elaborate, of an alleged security incident at Apple. Each time, we have conducted rigorous internal investigations based on their inquiries and each time we have found absolutely no evidence to support any of them. We have repeatedly and consistently offered factual responses, on the record, refuting virtually every aspect of Bloomberg’s story relating to Apple.

    On this we can be very clear: Apple has never found malicious chips, “hardware manipulations” or vulnerabilities purposely planted in any server. Apple never had any contact with the FBI or any other agency about such an incident. We are not aware of any investigation by the FBI, nor are our contacts in law enforcement. [...]

    And they go on to say a lot more that categorically denies Bloomberg's claims while suggesting that Bloomberg may be confused about the 2016 firmware incident.

    Super Micro:

    While we would cooperate with any government investigation, we are not aware of any investigation regarding this topic nor have we been contacted by any government agency in this regard. We are not aware of any customer dropping Supermicro as a supplier for this type of issue.

    And they go on to say a lot more that categorically denies Bloomberg's claims, including denying that they even make the chips that were allegedly compromised and that these companies supposedly purchased from them.

    Meanwhile, here's a complete list of Bloomberg's sources who were willing to speak on the record:

    *crickets*

    1. Re:What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Meanwhile, here's a complete list of Bloomberg's sources who were willing to speak on the record:

      *crickets*

      Were Woodward and Bernstein's Watergate source(s), e.g., Deepthroat, willing to have their names published?

    2. Re:What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

      Sounds to me like theoretically there's a simple (well, for me, or someone with my skill-set at least) way to determine if any of this is true or not: A comprehensive physical examination of Supermicro server motherboards being used in critical applications. If something that's not on the BOM for the PCB has been glued to the board and blue-wired into it, then it obviously doesn't belong there and is suspect. Any and all silicon should also be able to be identified by it's manufacturers' part number and it's existence on the PCB justified. Furthermore the BIOS should not have any extraneous code in it that either runs on the main processor cores or that loads into the various microcontroller cores found in the chipset of any modern computer. Hiding malicious code that only lives in RAM is one thing, but anything physical or that lives permanently in something physical is literally a smoking gun and should be able to be sussed out, you really can't hide it. I have to say though it's pretty cheeky of a manufacturer, Chinese or not, to do something like this, if in fact they have. Malware is one thing, something physical is a completely different ballgame.

    3. Re: What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just remember everyone: cloud computing and giving large corporations all of everyone's secret business data in one place is totally secure.

      Keep repeating until you start to believe it.

    4. Re:What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by jittles · · Score: 2

      While we would cooperate with any government investigation, we are not aware of any investigation regarding this topic nor have we been contacted by any government agency in this regard. We are not aware of any customer dropping Supermicro as a supplier for this type of issue.

      And they go on to say a lot more that categorically denies Bloomberg's claims, including denying that they even make the chips that were allegedly compromised and that these companies supposedly purchased from them.

      The article does not allege that Supermicro knows (as a corporation at least) or manufactures the chips in question. Supermicro designs boards and manufacturers in Taiwan and China make them. This chip is allegedly added onto some data lines between the BMC and host CPU during manufacture, and without actually being a part of the Supermicro design. Based on the images I have seen of this alleged chip, I don’t think anyone would even notice them if they were doing a standard quality review of a board supplied by these factories. However, I do not believe that Supermicro would be involved in this kind of investigation as they are the company being investigated. And we all know from NSL and things of that nature that companies can be compelled to comply with such an investigation and forced to deny participation in it. I’m not sure why your post was marked insightful because it’s not only partially incorrect, but it provides no value to the discussion as to whether or not such an attack is feasible and, if so, practical.

    5. Re:What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by jittles · · Score: 2

      Sounds to me like theoretically there's a simple (well, for me, or someone with my skill-set at least) way to determine if any of this is true or not: A comprehensive physical examination of Supermicro server motherboards being used in critical applications. If something that's not on the BOM for the PCB has been glued to the board and blue-wired into it, then it obviously doesn't belong there and is suspect. Any and all silicon should also be able to be identified by it's manufacturers' part number and it's existence on the PCB justified. Furthermore the BIOS should not have any extraneous code in it that either runs on the main processor cores or that loads into the various microcontroller cores found in the chipset of any modern computer. Hiding malicious code that only lives in RAM is one thing, but anything physical or that lives permanently in something physical is literally a smoking gun and should be able to be sussed out, you really can't hide it. I have to say though it's pretty cheeky of a manufacturer, Chinese or not, to do something like this, if in fact they have. Malware is one thing, something physical is a completely different ballgame.

      From my understanding of what was done, there is no way the firmware could know of, or detect this attack as the firmware itself cannot be trusted even if it is properly signed on the flash chip. The extra chip is sitting on lines between the BMC and the host CPU and can actually modify instructions on the CPU as it runs. Nothing after the initial platform security check (the first phase of the CPU initialization) can be trusted and that is only because the hardware debugging capabilities of these CPUs do not let you interfere with any instruction before the end of SEC.

    6. Re: What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's talking about physically seeing a component that doesn't belong.

    7. Re:What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what about when your "critical application" runs on a 1K, 10K, 100K or a million servers?

    8. Re:What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Spot-check a percentage of critical servers. These should all have backups that can handle the job while one is down anyway, am I right? If there's even a chance something like this is true then it should be a priority to determine the validity of the claim.

    9. Re: What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by bestweasel · · Score: 1

      What are we to make of Bloomberg's story then? Did they invent it?

      In all, 17 people confirmed the manipulation of Supermicro's hardware and other elements of the attacks. The sources were granted anonymity because of the sensitive, and in some cases classified, nature of the information.

    10. Re: What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by bestweasel · · Score: 2

      "If something that's not on the BOM for the PCB has been glued to the board and blue-wired into it"

      It was apparently not that obvious. They (allegedly) changed the board design at the factories making the Super Micro boards. Also,

      "In one case, the malicious chips were thin enough that theyâ(TM)d been embedded between the layers of fiberglass onto which the other components were attached, according to one person who saw pictures of the chips. That generation of chips was smaller than a sharpened pencil tip, the person says.

    11. Re:What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, here's a complete list of Bloomberg's sources who were willing to speak on the record:

      *crickets*

      Were Woodward and Bernstein's Watergate source(s), e.g., Deepthroat, willing to have their names published?

      It doesn't matter, that case didn't rely solely upon deep throat's testimony.

    12. Re: What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Okay, stet; but it's still a physical feature, therefore it can be proved to exist. Also if this is true then an x-ray of the PCBs compared to photographs of the top and bottom of the PCBs would show the 'phantom' component(s).

    13. Re: What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by nnull · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and we had the NSA intercepting shipments to put keyloggers and whatever backdoors in whatever electronics. It was categorely denied here for years that it could be happening, and then Snowden happened. Seriously, we had leaks and inkling of this happening way back in 2008, where lots of people denied it could be happening, labeled us as crazy kooks.

      And then we all forgot about Snowden and started willingly uploading all our wonderful data to Apple, Amazon, Samsung, Microsoft.

    14. Re: What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh. What case? What testimony? Just talking about sources going on record. What kind of shit are you reading?

    15. Re: What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stockmarket manipulation perhaps... Look at what stockticker went down in the aftermath of this 'news story'

    16. Re: What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Where would you get the BOM? Are you sure it can be trusted? How do you know any added component isn't part of a rework / revision that is required but not on the BOM? Have you ever worked with a Chinese manufacturer? Even when nothing malicious is going on it is basically impossible to get the correct information out of them. #SorryNotSoSimple #SorryNotSoSkilledAsYouThink

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    17. Re: What's that line about truth lacing its shoes? by starman97 · · Score: 1

      Supermicro has the BOM, Schematics, Layout files, they , pre the article are not in on the hack and would be motivated to clear their name.
      If there is a chip inserted in between layers, you won't need a BOM to find that, no one does that on mass-produced serverboards, it's far too expensive.

      Now, if there is a part that is nominally on the board, is part of the schematic and BOM , but has been replaced with a modified part, you wont find that on the paper work or even layout, you'll have to find a board with the part on it. I could see a reel of parts with the same footprint being substituted during a production run, but that means hundreds or thousands of boards are in the field.

      Surely some Engineer or Tech has one of these in a box that had failed for an unrelated reason, or were part of an engineering test or even a spare. There are only so many parts that are potential candidates for substituion, ie ganged pullups on the I2C lines , a single 2 pin package wont be able to affect or read data, buffers or possibly a filter on the RMII lines from the BMC MAC to the management network PHY , filters or baluns on the PHY to RJ45 network jack, the jack itself. the BMC boot EEPROM all come to mind.

      That's the problem with a hardware hack, it's going to leave a physical evidence trail. So far nothing has been produced.
      IMO this story is unraveling.

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
  46. Re:Snipe hunt 600 designs says find boards with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, just the tooling involved. Someone has to feed the pick-and-place machine.

  47. Re:Snipe hunt 600 designs says find boards with it by dknj · · Score: 1

    My datacenter provides me with decomm'd hardware purchased from Facebook. SuperMicro is one of the vendors. If I knew what to look for, I would. My SuperMicro server has BMC functionality tied to the main nic. It's conceptually possible to have the same vulnerability in my platform

  48. Bloomberg's Banned Since I Arrived by buravirgil · · Score: 0

    ...in 2014.

    I didn't come with a VPN because I wanted to see what my students saw. Sometimes it's not China blocking access, by the way. And before China, in Saudi Arabia, I was monitored by some entity who believed Slashdot was worth automatically downloading and my account was suspended for a time.

    China does not conduct foreign wars, and its territorial disputes are slow, negotiated processes. I have never heard as much hawkish, red-scare nonsense as I have for the past year. But such cycles are not new. The loudest, bullying voices are largely the same types asserting weak people hide behind victimhood only a few years ago.

    Help Us! Our elections are not safe! And it's not our fault! A Blue-wave is coming, finally, and Putin's control of our Commander-in-chief will be stopped...Just in Time! Russia is to blame! Their hackers are in control! All Russian hackers are so powerful, Zuckerberg is helpless! Jeff Bezos seems like a responsible robber baron! Twitter is necessary for democracy! And Freedom! And collecting, collating, and correlating consumer patterns to maintain quarterly projections, debt mechanisms, supremacy and exceptionalism to continue to police the world of its weapons we sold them! Mass shooting drill in the high school cafeteria! Russia causes acne! China invented wrinkles! Buy American Only! Cheap, foreign labor is not responsible for low inflation! I like three-car garages, a Winnebago, and a Jet-ski! My per-capita usage of energy, water, and sugar is ordained in Thessalonians 13:4! Gay people should still be forced to hide! Women once ruled the world and tortured men and this is the lesson of animal husbandry! The White Goddess won't let you smoke a cigar in the house! Young people might should lose their lives, or at least a limb, or two, for a reasonable capital gains tax! Elon Musk has gone too far! Alcohol may be more harmful than marijuana, but I go to work with a hang-over instead of taking a day off to *quote* smell the roses *end quote*

    --
    Would were! Should is! Could be! And live a hundred times three.
    1. Re:Bloomberg's Banned Since I Arrived by Whorhay · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How exactly does "slow, negotiated processes" fit with the military occupation of the South China Sea or Tibet?

    2. Re:Bloomberg's Banned Since I Arrived by buravirgil · · Score: 0

      Fit? Like a hat. Like a glove. Like a litany of descriptors of which an expressed incredulity is shamelessly and willfully ignorant because poopy zombie heads prefer narratives over facts, zero-sum scenarios, and secretly harbor doubts of inadequacy when challenged to be equitable which diverse, natural environments and tribalism conspired to prevent for most of humanity's time on earth, and, quite recently, is more imminently achievable than ever before.

      In other words, go play Risk with someone who is not bored by it. AFA HK? Mainlanders just want to shop for goods western companies have yet to price at a point acceptable to producers, or the Party is reluctant to grant mass distribution for many reasons related to distributions of wealth. Besides, the locals are not thriving with its inflation and Britain turned HK into an advertising center for pubescent males as well as a sex-worker trap. AFA Taiwan? The proximity of the island, its orientation to the mainland as far as development, its cultural ties versus advantages of trading with the west...not policies solved with armed conflict. I mean...what is your idea? Hypothetically...were China to land boots on Taiwan, can America's position be to send soldiers and material just off the coast of China? Do you look at a map, or assume most Americans do not when harping about Taiwan? Historically, Japan was guilty of imperial ambitions, and China's alliance with Russia and America's defeat of the Japanese ended all of that.

      The most annoying aspect of engaging with the likes of posts like yours is the utterly convenient assertions made which wholly ignore colonialism, the world wars, and how significantly shattered were the economies of Russia and China after the WWII. The US' development of the Philippines is a shambles and a farce after seventy years: A sex-worker trap and shopping mall in the north, an "exotic" SCUBA resort in the middle, and a southern end so impoverished that Muslims have gained a foot-hold because when you have nothing at all, praying five times a day has an appeal.

      China is rapidly expanding its economy through infrastructure development (e.g. residential towers, roads, bridges, trains) all around the world (those islands involve trade, not tactical position, but America's business interests are military matters, huh?) while America consumes at levels no other developing economy can afford in terms of engineering or natural resources and demonstrate progress through failed loans and McDonalds (retail outlets).

      No, please, have the last world...I mean word.

      --
      Would were! Should is! Could be! And live a hundred times three.
    3. Re:Bloomberg's Banned Since I Arrived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fit? Like a hat. Like a glove. Like a litany of descriptors of which an expressed incredulity is shamelessly and willfully ignorant because poopy zombie heads prefer narratives over facts, zero-sum scenarios, and secretly harbor doubts of inadequacy when challenged to be equitable which diverse, natural environments and tribalism conspired to prevent for most of humanity's time on earth, and, quite recently, is more imminently achievable than ever before.

      In other words, go play Risk with someone who is not bored by it. AFA HK? Mainlanders just want to shop for goods western companies have yet to price at a point acceptable to producers, or the Party is reluctant to grant mass distribution for many reasons related to distributions of wealth. Besides, the locals are not thriving with its inflation and Britain turned HK into an advertising center for pubescent males as well as a sex-worker trap. AFA Taiwan? The proximity of the island, its orientation to the mainland as far as development, its cultural ties versus advantages of trading with the west...not policies solved with armed conflict. I mean...what is your idea? Hypothetically...were China to land boots on Taiwan, can America's position be to send soldiers and material just off the coast of China? Do you look at a map, or assume most Americans do not when harping about Taiwan? Historically, Japan was guilty of imperial ambitions, and China's alliance with Russia and America's defeat of the Japanese ended all of that.

      The most annoying aspect of engaging with the likes of posts like yours is the utterly convenient assertions made which wholly ignore colonialism, the world wars, and how significantly shattered were the economies of Russia and China after the WWII. The US' development of the Philippines is a shambles and a farce after seventy years: A sex-worker trap and shopping mall in the north, an "exotic" SCUBA resort in the middle, and a southern end so impoverished that Muslims have gained a foot-hold because when you have nothing at all, praying five times a day has an appeal.

      China is rapidly expanding its economy through infrastructure development (e.g. residential towers, roads, bridges, trains) all around the world (those islands involve trade, not tactical position, but America's business interests are military matters, huh?) while America consumes at levels no other developing economy can afford in terms of engineering or natural resources and demonstrate progress through failed loans and McDonalds (retail outlets).

      No, please, have the last world...I mean word.

      OK my red friend, you didn't answer the question though. Nobody cares about all of the other shit in your post because it happened a long time ago.

      You cannot just take over the sea and hurt your neighbors just because it helps you economically, or because someone else did something worse in the past.

  49. Compromised Cloud Servers? by dataxtream · · Score: 1

    This article implies that China has the technology to implant tiny microchips during the manufacturing process. If China can do this then the NSA certainly can. And if the NSA can do it, then they are doing it already. There is a bigger story here than mere China bashing.

    1. Re:Compromised Cloud Servers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IME

  50. Ditch coal jobs and build it here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government should give incentives for manufacturing chips in the USA instead of worrying about coal jobs.

  51. Re:Trump Followers are mostly closeted faggots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, just shut the fuck up you ignorant moron.

  52. In US more likely to have employee inform press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Yeah, well, nobody should be doing business with the US either, it's not like they don't do stuff like this.

    In the US we are more likely to see an employee inform the press if an employer is doing stuff like this. In China, not so much.

  53. Bloomberg faces downsides by etudiant · · Score: 1

    I'd expect Bloomberg would make sure they were bulletproof on the facts, because the article has lots of potential downsides for them. They must have hardware evidence at a minimum.
    For one, it will surely anger the Chinese government, an entity which holds grudges better than anyone. This story burned a lot of bridges.
    For another, the various named businesses who are reported to have knowingly operated penetrated services will need to clear their reputations with their customers.
    Lastly, Supermicro is very damaged by this and may get put out of business, they will be fighting for survival and will pull no punches.
    Afaik, retired intelligence personnel is still bound by their oath to not disclose classified information. That makes it challenging to mount a defense, so the hardware will have to provide the needed proofs.

  54. Trump owns it now. by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you want to take credit, you have to take blame. I give 2 shits about Hilllary. What does her being a completely worthless piece of shit have to do with the current President and others in charge of the country doing everything they can to undermine American democracy and the livelihood of the American citizenry?

  55. Board models? by _bug_ · · Score: 1

    I wish they had shared the model of the board(s) that were compromised. It'd be interesting to see independent researchers get their hands on a few examples and look for this magic chip, maybe even reverse it.

    There are tons of Supermicro boards on eBay with IPMI/BMCs, but are any of them the same as the compromised model(s)?

  56. Apple's Statement says Bloomberg is spreading FUD by phayes · · Score: 1

    See Apple's Statement here: https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

    Looks like Bloomberg only believes their reporter's secret sources and refuses to believe Apple when they investigate when consulted for comments and refute repeatedly the allegations.

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  57. Supermicro was delisted from Nasdaq a few months a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coincidence?

  58. A Devastating, Irrefutable Comment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait, it was actually lame.

    Those aren't mutually exclusive things you know. And you posted no supporting links or data. Why am I even responding, this parent was one lazy-ass POS!

  59. Obviously they'd refute it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What else would they do? "Oh hey we're totally pwned guys, sorry about that." *record scratch, everyone Market Crash chicken-with-head-cut-off-to-find-non-Pwnd-servers-starts*

    Not that I buy the report. But I mean, OBVIOUSLY the companies would refute it to try to save face until they have the means of going "ok, so we WERE hacked, but these hardware servers we just bought don't have the back door. OH GOD PLEASE CONTINUE TO USE OUR BUSINESS!~"

  60. Make our own crap. by hackus · · Score: 1

    They told us we were too dumb to make our own stuff.

    Then they told us that people are too expensive to make our own stuff.

    Then they told us after automating the factory floor, making labor costs insignificant we have to have a monopoly or we can't compete.

    I wonder what their excuse will be now why we can't make our own stuff?

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re:Make our own crap. by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

      They told us we were too dumb to make our own stuff.

      Then they told us that people are too expensive to make our own stuff.

      Then they told us after automating the factory floor, making labor costs insignificant we have to have a monopoly or we can't compete.

      I wonder what their excuse will be now why we can't make our own stuff?

      The excuse, which isn't an excuse, is that we don't know how. It's quite literally true. Building a high frequency mainboard correctly is nontrivial, and while we know how to design them, and know how to set up automated tests for them, we don't know all the little tricks that actual manufacturers have learned by doing the job for decades.

      Sparkfun has been finding that out, and documenting some of it publicly. They bought a pick and place machine so they could fabricate their own boards for some of the stuff they design. Getting it to work reliably was a journey, and not an easy one. And that's for crappy little $20 low frequency parts that work even on a breadboard, not gigahertz boards worth $1000 before you even drop a CPU onto them.

      Somebody will be learning how again. You can bet that now that it's public, the US government acquisitions process will start mandating US assembly for boards it buys for use in classified environments. Somebody will jump on that, because they'll be able to charge a huge premium for a while, since there will be no other option. Monopoly pricing always attracts the US business man.

  61. Fake News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News sourced from people who knows someone familiar with the process.
    Not practically possible at OEMs to large companies that design their own hardware.

  62. Offshore chips are an *obvious* security risk. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Buying chips offshore is a national security risk and always has been. If you're stupid enough to think that the Chinese military won't exploit chips/software/tech products bound for the USA for their own benefit, I have a bridge I can sell you.

    Of course, as always, profits before country. Can't restrict Northrop Grumman, ya know. And you can bet the current crop of republican technopeasants don't have this on their radar.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  63. Orwell by h8sg8s · · Score: 1

    Orwell was an optimist. Nation states are all posturing to see who can create the culture most similar to 1984 without anyone raising the alarm. "Boil the frog" is the new mantra for this effort - take away freedoms and security in small bites and before you know it you've lost everything.

    --
    Organization? You must be joking..
  64. Re:Reporting? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everyone involved on both sides has come out publicly to say Bloomberg is wrong. Why are we still talking about it?

    All parties involved have it in their vested interest to deny this.

    All parties are required by law to deny this. It's a classified investigation which Bloomberg says is still open. According to Bloomberg's reporting, they don't just want to deny it—they have to deny it. With the Supermicro boards in question in use by the DOD and the CIA, it's quite literally a matter of national security.

  65. Mod Parent up, Please by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    LOL.
    Actually, that was pretty good.
    . Have to admit that I will be happy when he is booked for treason, but for dealing with China, he has done more than any president since Kennedy.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  66. As a user of Super Micro motherboards... by nuckfuts · · Score: 2

    I'd like to hear about mitigation. Would simply not configuring an IP address on the BMC be enough?

    I generally configure whatever kind of BMC I have available on a server (such as HPE iLO or Dell iDRAC) because I like the idea of low-level remote access, but in truth I can't recall ever having used it to solve a problem.

    1. Re:As a user of Super Micro motherboards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most effective mitigation is out of band on the network side. Thorough monitoring of network traffic to/from server vlans, knowing what is talking to whom/when/why...etc.

      Just hope that your SIEM and network devices are running owned hardware too.

  67. Re: What's that line about truth lacing its shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, your annual software license has expired & you are locked out of all your files.

    Please renew your annual subscription to regain access to the data files you created.

  68. To be expected from ethnic Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ethnic Chinese whom have come to the USA have come primarily for financial reasons. Their loyalty to their home country remains. Some Americans refuse to acknowledge this truth.

  69. Re: Elementals CEO died suddenly of a heart attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except for Jim Fixx.

    But I agree that the Elemental thing is suspicious.

    China has sodomized the US long enough. There was an interesting article on CNBC today about how this goes beyond trump. There is a Cold War and the countries of the world will eventually have to choose to be Chicom centric or US centric.

    And as unlikely as it sounds, I predict a military skirmish in the South or East China Sea soon. I read yesterday we are planning on making a big show of force in the pacific, carrier battle groups transiting the straights of Taiwan and even countries in South America where the chicoms are setting up shop.

  70. History Repeats by JimSadler · · Score: 2

    The US, a few years ago, put chips in top end printers, under the assumption that when they were exported that foreign governments would be the typical purchaser. So if you were in Iraq and wondered why that smart bomb picked your chimney it was due to the printer sending the address. Sometimes what goes around comes straight down right at your noggin.

  71. Re:Reporting? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    All parties involved have it in their vested interest to deny this.

    Bloomberg have vested interest to provide more than a computer animation too.

  72. Christian Persecurion by labnet · · Score: 1

    From Wikipedia.
    The Associated Press reported in 2018 that "Xi is waging the most severe systematic suppression of Christianity in the country since religious freedom was written into the Chinese constitution in 1982.", which has involved "destroying crosses, burning bibles, shutting churches and ordering followers to sign papers renouncing their faith

    --
    46137
    1. Re:Christian Persecurion by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And who else reported it?

      Strangely it never was in the "news" ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  73. Anubis misses the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the thing about an existence proof: you don't need to show the derivation, just the instance.

    Pull one supermicro board with one chip that you can rev-eng, and there's proof, whether or not there are Voices Of Authority willing to admit it.

    Since this BMI-interfacing chip didn't fall out of a hairnet, but was carefully placed on the boards in the manufacturing process: regardless of what actors are involved, THIS IS A SUPPLY CHAIN COMPROMISE. Anything saying otherwise is misinformation. Bloomberg might have the actors wrong (eg. USA interests could well hire Chinese nationals to make those initial bribes), but not the nature of it.

  74. Re:Reporting? by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

    Because we remember when 'everyone involved' came out and said that the NSA wasn't spying on phone and internet traffic.

    And we remember when 'everyone involved' said that ATT did not have a special room that the NSA connected into the major telco fibers all across the US.

    And we remember when the government gave 'everyone involved' retro active immunity for spying on all the phone calls and internet traffic.

  75. US is like the company that lost its way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like Cisco, they innovated and were great at one point, then it went to their heads and while they were politicizing everything, the other world's super power infiltrated them at the hardware level.

  76. Re:Why are your mangement consoles on the Internet by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

    All they need is a DNS 'proxy' to pull that code. How many organizations fully protect and monitor their DNS infrastructure?

  77. On stealth hardware (R) by UnixUnix · · Score: 1

    [comment in companion post on this topic, repeated here]: The Bloomberg link is worth reading, grain of rice -sized HW backdoor and all. Things have progressed quite a bit since 2005, when I opened up an Averatec laptop and noticed a stealth CastleNet mini comm board -- no, it wasn't on any bus or otherwise part of the architecture, it was "in the air", GLUED to the underside of the top cover, with just a cable running to the Ethernet port! Most likely injection somewhere in the supply chain. How crude, huh. What a difference 10 years can make.

  78. Re: Reporting? by nnull · · Score: 1

    And the sad part is, we knew all this 5+ years before Snowden. Everyone, even on here, flat out denied it could be happening. Now everyone is happy to upload all their data to China.

  79. Re:Reporting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well the article goes back to 2015.

  80. Re: Apple's Statement says Bloomberg is spreading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like they have no skin in the game, right? Their denial is fairly worthless.

  81. How to check hardware? by manu0601 · · Score: 2

    I have a few Supermicro motherboards. How can I check if they are compromised? Is there some audit tool available?

  82. 2015 to extinction, looks about right by Nostalgia4Infinity · · Score: 1
  83. Re:Reporting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It might indeed be possible to require companies to deny this. But, have you read their denials? The denials are beyond complying with a legal requirement and extend to outright condemnation of Bloomberg's reporting on the matter. Have a particular look at Apple's statement and tell me again that you think they're coerced to publish that.

    I'm usually very open to believing this kind of thing, but the detail of the refutations are hard to ignore in this case.

  84. Please just flag and move on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trolls do what they do for a reaction. If you donâ(TM)t react they get bored and stop.

  85. X-ray your power supply chips for more fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some power supply chips seem to have a simple dipole antenna and receiver that works in the GHz range. It appears that the right signal would cause it it shift data into a shift register and if that matches what it is looking for, it disables the regulator feedback causing over voltage with as much current as the chip can deal with. A 200 watt transmitter in space could fry the device in a way that makes it unrepairable if it is outdoors. A 30 second burst at 20 kw from a micro-satellite transmitter would get to anything most anywhere that a GPS or mobile phone would get reception including inside computer cases.

  86. Is SEC investigating for stock price manipulation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SMCI 12,60 USD -8,80 (41,12 % down)

    Unless Bloomberg comes up with hard proof this looks more like a classical crash&cash that should be awarded with RL jail time...

  87. Re: What's that line about truth lacing its shoes by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    If they have chips embedded between the PCB layers, then there is a chip to be found, along with traces (if the chip is to be of any use). Those things are easy to detect. Something hard would be if the chips themselves were modifies, but even that is possible to detect with fuzzing. That is, the chips were modified to do *something* and you can figure out what that was (just like people have been finding "secret" opcodes on Intel chips).

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  88. Re: Reporting? by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    Not everyone. You keep using that word.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  89. the RICE CHIP HOAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have thought higher of your readership than to be sucking on those Harry Potter conspiracy lollypops. Anyone with any marginal technical prowess knows the NSA Bloomberg story is a hoax right down to the fake photos.

    The simple fact is that there has never been a rice-sized microcontroller chip on a motherboard. Apple, Amazon, Super Micro have never participated in any FBI or Gov investigation in regard to Bloomberg's claim.

    What is amusing, if such a device existed and it doesn't the worst possible place to send them would be Apple and Amazon where every server board is examined and bench checked and all data is analyzed. If you are going to send them someplace send them to a place that doesn't know anything.

    What is Apple and Amazon doing with the servers? Selling music and apps. That environment would be useless to a spy.

    Then we have the big fiction... that Government workers at the NSA are the smartest Tech heads in the world. Yikes. If you are top in your engineering class at MIT, you are not going to go to work for the NSA but you might work for Apple, Amazon, or Super Micro. Remember it was the NSA and CIA that complacently and ineptly watched the Twin towers fall to the ground on 911. Suddenly from stupid, they are now geniuses in technology and espionage. Yeah, that's how it works.

    I realize that in most of your classes the Asian students are kicking your butts because your math skills suck but that is no reason to suddenly arrive at the conclusion that Asians can do the impossible with some CAD software and a soldering iron. Bloomberg's story is so past the plausible that it is intellectually insulting.

    Of course, that hasn't stopped the fleas from riding the bandwagon and implying that this Bloomberg garbage is real. Yeah so are the Wizards in Harry Potter stores once you suspend reason.

    When you become prone to conspiracy theories then your mind is no longer working.
     

  90. Re:Apple's Statement says Bloomberg is spreading F by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See Apple's Statement here: https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

    Looks like Bloomberg only believes their reporter's secret sources and refuses to believe Apple when they investigate when consulted for comments and refute repeatedly the allegations.

    In other news: phayes ( 202222 ) is an authoritarian who believes whatever someone in a position of power dictates, and brushes off any view that doesn't match the dictated view from their chosen one. Rather than form their own conclusion based on the evidence. Of which, it's too early to call on this one.

    Turn in your geek card, you're done.