Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk Tweets About Tesla Sales, the SEC, and a Special Offer From SpaceX (marketwatch.com)

Tesla's model 3 is now one of the five top-selling sedans in America (while sales of the Mercedes-Benz C-Class are down 28 percent through September), Bloomberg reports. Elon Musk tweeted out a link to their article on Thursday -- but it was his other tweet, a satirical criticism of the SEC, that made headlines. MarketWatch reports: Tesla shares ended 7% lower on Friday as Wall Street reacted to Musk's tweet seemingly out of nowhere late Thursday about the "Shortseller Enrichment Commission." Musk also tweeted that day that short sellers were "value destroyers" and should be illegal. Friday's losses for Tesla "produced more than half a billion in paper profit for the shorts," S3 Partners LLC, which tracks real-time short interest data, said in a note. Since news of the Musk's settlement with the SEC, shorts are up $941 million, S3 Partners said. "Clearly short positions are building in the wake of strong selling by longs, as Musk demonstrates a refusal to keep away from controversy," the note said.
The article notes that last Saturday the SEC settled charges that Musk misled investors with a tweet about taking Tesla private. "Terms of the settlement included requiring Tesla to rein in Musk's social-media communications, but it was unclear when Tesla intends to implement that.... The settlement has yet to be court-approved."

On Friday Musk was back on point, tweeting out the news that Tesla owners "can refer someone to buy a Tesla & get any image they want laser etched in glass & sent to deep space for millions of years."

147 comments

  1. Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Itâ(TM)s a thin line.

    1. Re:Jerk or genius? by taiwanjohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some of both, obviously, but more of the latter IMHO. The guy is under a lot of stress lately, and he's letting his inner demons spill out via Twitter occasionally, leading to some serious consequences for himself and his companies (and shareholders).

      Ironically, this is all happening just as Tesla is ramping up Model 3 production to break-even level, where they'll be able to start posting legitimate GAAP profits. If he can just contain his demons for a few more weeks, Tesla will be in a much better position, and the short-sellers will be less of a concern.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    2. Re:Jerk or genius? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Both but he is not wrong.

    3. Re: Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they're often a congruence.

    4. Re:Jerk or genius? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Some of both, obviously, but more of the latter IMHO. The guy is under a lot of stress lately, and he's letting his inner demons spill out via Twitter occasionally, leading to some serious consequences for himself and his companies (and shareholders).

              He's acting like a drug abuser, the paranoia and erratic statements are classic symptoms.

    5. Re:Jerk or genius? by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      Yeah, the way to get back at the short sellers isn't to sink to the same level of mudslinging and misinformation. The best way is to make the company successful. Musk might not get to drag their names through the mud, but he can take comfort knowing that he caused them to lose a lot of money, which those types of slimy weasels probably care much more about than their reputation anyways.

    6. Re: Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, that's also half of Congress.

    7. Re:Jerk or genius? by hey! · · Score: 2

      Why not both?

      In other news, Musk is underwriting drinking water filtration for Flint Michigan schools and households with the highest contamination levels. That's pretty damn awesome, but calling that cave diver a pedophile is pretty damned scuzzy.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, he is. Short sellers help make the market, along with every other participant who brings money to the table.

      Do you see Jeff Bezos bitching about shorts? Did Bill Gates whine about them, back in his day? How about Steve Jobs?

      Or the nutty industrialist who is apparently Musk's role model, Howard Hughes?

      No, those guys all just went to work in the morning, focused on company business, and came home at night. Would be nice if Musk would try that once in a while, just to see how it goes. I'm through carrying water for him.

    9. Re:Jerk or genius? by jwymanm · · Score: 1

      Or someone with sleep deprivation (and drugs)

    10. Re:Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Genius? Hardly. He didn't invent PayPal. He didn't invent Tesla. He steps in and takes over other people's companies. He may have an instinct for business, but genius is a bridge too far.

    11. Re:Jerk or genius? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "Do you see Jeff Bezos bitching about shorts? Did Bill Gates whine about them, back in his day? How about Steve Jobs?"

      That doesn't make him wrong. The matter really has nothing to do with Musk. Without insider knowledge shorts are nothing but pure gambling, they aren't needed for economic benefit, you can simply vote for the segments you believe will win and you've accomplished the same thing as shorts are meant to do and might do a better job of resisting the poison where an entire industry drops in share price as a consequence of just one company in it doing poorly.

      I can't speak for every instance but shorts are commonly used by heavy hitters to manipulate the markets toward their interests such as institutional investors with a great deal of capital and heavy losses when AMD became better managed and produced superior technology to intel. Using connections to lots of market talking heads they spread FUD and using ridiculously deep pockets they drove the stock down over and over again triggering fear based sell off. The drops weren't consistent with the actual performance of the company or the technology nor where they consistent with the greater vote of the market. They stalled the stock for months between the $10-15 despite nothing but positive reality. Why? Easy, at $3/share they were shorting AMD to the tune of billions and used a bunch of smaller shorts in that range to offset the losses and hoped to create enough doubt in the market to break the stock.

      There are ways shorts can work that would at least be equitable but as it stands all the rules around shorts mean they hurt normal investors while benefiting only massive ones. That isn't a free and competitive market.

    12. Re:Jerk or genius? by theskipper · · Score: 2

      A few notes: There is reporting out a couple hours ago that a financing package is still being attempted: https://twitter.com/CGasparino... By the wording, it appears to be a DIP package but would be cautious assuming that (still think it's a few months though: https://slashdot.org/comments....).

      The Solar City bond payment of $230m is almost here as well as the massive March convert so something needs to be done as the Q3 numbers are almost certainly dismal. And any talk of senior refinancing will certainly cause some suppliers to go COD hindering production greatly.

      As far as its effects on the equity, it's clearly going to be just above worthless in any deal, but it could hang out in double-digits for a while. And don't forget that a drop below $200 will snowball Elon's pledged shares into margin-call territory. So be cautious about any sub-$100 puts that look oh-so-tasty, stick with the closer strikes.

      Lastly, Musk's attacks on shortsellers are simply scapegoating and desperation at this point. The amount of short shares available is plentiful and actually increased yesterday during the big drop. The downward pressure was clearly large long holders dumping. The blame for this company's failure is solely on his shoulders.

    13. Re:Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You asshol - musk single handed invented the eletric car and th battry

    14. Re:Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of both, obviously ...

      -

      Buddy, if you think Musk is a genius, you're a poor judge of genius.

      Musk is a smart guy, but Musk is no Issac Newton, or Albert Einstein. Musk is just a pesky fly who will buzz around until the people who have control of this world have had enough and they deploy the flyswatter.

      Musk is sick guy. He lacks discretion and he lacks common sense, and he doesn't seem to understand there are limits to his power. Musk persists in doing and saying incredibly ill-advised things, and stupid people are amused by it. But smart people are viewing Musk as a slow-motion train wreck. And they are not wrong.

    15. Re:Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither the guy is a low intelligence moron with delusions of grandeur.

    16. Re:Jerk or genius? by Rei · · Score: 2

      "Bankers inundating Tesla" in no way means that Tesla is seeking it out. It says literally the exact opposite.

      $230M is nothing. March is half a year away.

      --
      "Close the door! What, were you born in a barn?" -- Police chief, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
    17. Re: Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is the thing though.

      Why do you need to get back at the short sellers? You absolutely do not need to. They have no influence on your profitability, bond rating, etc. all they are doing is telling the (secondary) market they will buy shares at some date in the future at a lower price than the stock is currently trading for.

      Those purchases will come from people who have either purchased stock directly from Tesla (and so contributed capital) or from people who bought shares from people who bought directly (and so did not contribute capital).

      Musk has this obsession with short sellers and, let me explain this if you could not follow what I just laid out... it has nothing to do with short sellers hurting Tesla as a company. It has everything to do with Elon getting mad like a sorry bitch that people doubt him, expect him to fail as CEO, and therefore leverage money to borrow shares that they do not own to make a profit on the cult of Elon.

      Hope that helps!

    18. Re:Jerk or genius? by theskipper · · Score: 0

      Incorrect, $230m is a ton of money to them. The Fremont factory has already been mortgaged. A/P is at over $3B. The backlog of ZEV credits are worth a fraction of what they were last year. Have you actually read their the last 10-Q, or at a base minimum, their balance sheet?

      And March is actually 11 weeks away, Tesla must have $800m in unencumbered cash by the end of Dec or be in violation of the covenants.

    19. Re: Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily even at a lower price. If Musk really has the goods the way he thinks, then the best way to get back at the shorts is to get the stock price as high as possible and increasing.

      The man is a buffoon. I'm surprised that he doesn't get on well with the President.

    20. Re:Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes him immature. Shorting a stock is something that is needed at times when the price is higher than it should be. It does apply a certain amount of downward pressure on the price, but it doesn't work well if there are reasons to think the business is growing and going to be worth more in the future.

      In the case of Tesla, they're desperate and the obsession with getting the shorts is doing a lot of damage. That's on top of the damage that trying to arbitrarily ramp up production at all costs just to make Musk's predictions work out.

      The man is a fool and the board should have kicked him out quite a while. At this point, there's not really any reason as the company likely will be going out of business in the relatively near future.

    21. Re:Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news, Musk is underwriting drinking water filtration for Flint

      Well after the problem was fixed.

    22. Re:Jerk or genius? by Rei · · Score: 2

      It really isn't. $230M it's an order of magnitude less than cash on hand. Tesla has some loans against assets (like almost all companies), but not 100%. Bringing up just accounts payable is silly, as if it's the only item on the balance sheet; Tesla's total assets are 27,9B and total liabilities are 22,6B. You have no clue what the current price on ZEV credits is. And yes, duh.

      And March is actually 11 weeks away

      Someone failed math.

      Tesla must have $800m in unencumbered cash by the end of Dec or be in violation of the covenants.

      1) Citation needed
      2) Free cash (not counting restricted cash) is $2,2B.

      --
      "Close the door! What, were you born in a barn?" -- Police chief, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
    23. Re:Jerk or genius? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      It really isn't. $230M it's an order of magnitude less than cash on hand.

      No, it's an order of magnitude less cash than they had on June 30th. They've been burning more cash, probably North of $600MM which means that the $230MM payment due in a few weeks is pushing 17-18% of cash reserves.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    24. Re:Jerk or genius? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      There are only TWO reasons to give a crap about the stock price:

      1. You believe your job as CEO is on the line because the price is dropped too much from pressure from shorts and the stockholders pressured the Chairman and the board to replace the CEO.

      2. You need to have a higher stock price to sell more stock at a maximum value to continue funding operations (running a negative cash flow), and for every dollar your shares drop in value it is that many more shares you must sell

      My guess is it is much more the latter. Losing more money, needing to sell shares to fund operations (let alone growth), and wanting to avoid as much dilution of stock as possible.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    25. Re:Jerk or genius? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      $230M is nothing.

      Bullshit. There are 7 companies on the planet that can pull $230m out of their liquid assets and not notice it, and even they can only do that because they don't treat it as 'nothing'.

    26. Re:Jerk or genius? by theskipper · · Score: 2

      1) A/P is certainly a valid consideration when a company asks their vendors to refund cash. This request made by Tesla was a clear indicator of distress, not a negotiating tactic.

      2) Meeting the unrestricted cash on hand requirement (actually $920m+$400m=$1.32b) for the March converts occurs in approx 11 weeks (Jan 1).

      3) As requested, citation from the covenants document:
      https://mobile.twitter.com/Pau...

      4) As of mid-August that figure was $1.69B per the WSJ. But as you know Tesla does not break out customer deposits as that would reveal the amount of actual demand for their products. Coupled with the status of the ABL, it's unclear where they stand now.

      5) No, I don't know the current price of ZEV credits because they are negotiated. It's been widely reported that demand is down from other manufacturers. Citations are available via Google.

    27. Re:Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when did genius have anything to do with making money?

    28. Re: Jerk or genius? by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      If the shorts were just making an honest bet on the downfall of the company by selling shares and waiting for the price to drop, that wouldn't be so bad. They don't limit themselves to that, though. Plenty of inaccurate and downright made up stories have been spread to push share price down so the shorts can profit. Like the yellow lines story (factory is unsafe, has no yellow lines because Elon doesn't like the color yellow... quickly debunked with an actual picture of the factory floor full of yellow lines), or the story with lots of newly produced Model 3s in a parking lot supposedly showing there are not enough buyers (never mind the multi-hundred thousand waiting list). The constant stream of negativity does affect bond interest rates. Also, a lower share price means it's harder to raise capital since you have to issue more shares to get the same amount of cash. That means it does affect operations quite a bit.

      Of course not all the negative stories are false, and there's plenty of justified criticism about the performance of the company. But some of them are really completely disconnected from reality, and I understand it can be quite infuriating when you see the share price of your company go down based on what you know to be total bollocks spread by people who are just doing this for personal profit.

      Then again, he ought to know that tweeting about them is actually helping them right now.

    29. Re:Jerk or genius? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      So far three people have replied to me... and every one has replied with something to do with Musk and/or Tesla. My comment was about shorts, not Tesla or its CEO.

    30. Re:Jerk or genius? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Not in this case, short sellers are actual parasites.

    31. Re: Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense.

      The only investors capable of moving a stock are the huge institutional investment houses.

      Do you think they make multi-billion dollar decisions based on internet rumors on slashdot, Reddit, and the Tesla forums OR based on quarterly financial statements, official company news, and the truly insane drug-fueled public rants of the CEO?

      Get real. The stock is shorted BECAUSE the books are crap and he is a mad man. Shorting did not make the stock over priced crap, the bonds have junk rating, and the CEO self-medicate and rant like a petulant and spoiled 14 year old.

    32. Re: Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, do we need to set up some sort of survey or something to send the guy on vacation?

      @ElonMusk I know Tesla is your baby and that kind of dedication is vital to building something to change the world, but you are at your best as a visionary. Donâ(TM)t react to the nay-sayers on their terms, react on your terms, by building, achieving that which everyone claims canâ(TM)t be done. Donâ(TM)t get down in the mud with the short sellers, continue to grow the company. Most of us do realize the lack of profit is investment in growth, in building, why do you think the stock is so high to begin with.

    33. Re:Jerk or genius? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      SpaceX is his own company and it's the best performing of all the ones he runs.

    34. Re:Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SpaceX is the best performing of these, because Musk is involved in it the least. He's only a shareholder and a credit-taker there, but the work is done by other people.

    35. Re:Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a "normal investor"? Unless you've bought the shares of a company directly from it when they are offered initially, you're not an "investor", you're just holding a claim against some of their future profits.

      The company you believe you're "investing in" has not seen anything from you. You give them no capital, no managerial expertise, no connections. You're an outsider, who is hoping that the company will do well enough to pay you a dividend in one form or another.

      You may think you have an emotional connection to the company whose stock you hold, but it is completely imaginary.

      Your buying stocks on the market is just as much "nothing but a pure gambling" as shorting.

    36. Re:Jerk or genius? by hey! · · Score: 1

      You're two years ahead of where the actual work on Flint's water system is.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    37. Re: Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Tesla is worth what it's supposed to be worth, the shorts shouldn't matter. You people are just mad you keep losing.

    38. Re: Jerk or genius? by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Whenever a bad rumor comes out, lots of people freak out and sell. I've seen many occasions where the stock dropped 5% or more based on a rumor that later turned out to be false. Sometimes it recovers the same day after the rumor is debunked. Lots of small investors together can have a big effect on the stock price.

      Also, I think you overestimate the intelligence of the big investment houses. Lehman Brothers comes to mind...

    39. Re:Jerk or genius? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. He does the overall design and conceived the original flight operations regime. He's called the CTO for a reason. He acts much like a chief designer in the USSR would. It's in Tesla that he was only supposed to be a shareholder, but he later took the reigns because he thought the CEO was incompetent. Although, to be honest, the manufacturing problems Tesla had back then were pretty much caused by impositions to the specifications that Musk himself pushed forward. I doubt the company would have grown like it did with had the previous CEO still been managing the place.

    40. Re: Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bull. You mean he signed off on someone else's ideas then called them his own. He's known for this.

    41. Re: Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Musk cannot do any of this. All he's got is a BA in physics from a third-rate South African college.

      I doubt he even knows the Euler formula or how to do a Taylor expansion.

    42. Re:Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      took the reigns

      Moron.

    43. Re:Jerk or genius? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Ironically, this is all happening just as Tesla is ramping up Model 3 production to break-even level, where they'll be able to start posting legitimate GAAP profits. If he can just contain his demons for a few more weeks, Tesla will be in a much better position, and the short-sellers will be less of a concern.

      No, Tesla will be in pretty much the same position it is now... With a stock price far in excess of any reasonable value based on revenue and billions of dollars in bonds coming due over the next four years. (Bonds that Tesla is going to have a very hard time repaying, even if they do start making an actual profit on the Model 3.)

    44. Re:Jerk or genius? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "The company you believe you're "investing in" has not seen anything from you. You give them no capital, no managerial expertise, no connections. You're an outsider, who is hoping that the company will do well enough to pay you a dividend in one form or another.

      You may think you have an emotional connection to the company whose stock you hold, but it is completely imaginary."

      That would be entirely true, if not for the others doing the same thing. As it is, there is some connection to the company. One, others buy and sell that stock believing it is connected to the company and their actions will revolve around assessment, earnings, and general events. Two, the board is elected by shareholders and is typically composed of shareholders. Three, executives at the company are often primarily compensated in stock. Last but not least, many companies have measures to tie employees interest into the stock performance. When you buy stock you aren't normally directly investing in the company, for that matter you aren't even usually investing in their future profits anymore because more and more companies aren't issuing dividends but you are making an investment in the performance of the company so long as others continue to believe so. Stock is no different than currency in this fashion.

      "Your buying stocks on the market is just as much "nothing but a pure gambling" as shorting."

      No there is a very big difference. When you buy stock you can hold on to that stock through ups and downs. When you short stock you have to know WHEN it is going to fall or your position will be closed and you will be forced to accept a loss at the worst moment. The only ones with enough capital to ensure they don't have to worry about that are large institutional investors.

      Of course, if you already own the stock you have a reliable way to short it without this risk but isn't a short it is simply selling your shares and buying them back at the lower price. That is the legitimate way to "short" a stock.

    45. Re:Jerk or genius? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Another simpler way to put it. Stocks don't have zero connection, they are just more like fantasy football leagues than sports betting.

      Also, share price most definitely has an impact on the companies credit. Which for a company like AMD which has produced superior technology to Intel and needs to ramp up and expand to capitalize on it is a very big deal.

    46. Re:Jerk or genius? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      It's amazing. I don't have a Tesla. At this point I have no plans to get an electric car until that's all I can get. But that's beside the point. If Space X can do awesome stuff with space exploration, I'll be thrilled. But there is one thing I do wonder: CAN'T ANYONE KEEP HIS TRIP SHUT ANYMORE? The US President can't keep his trap shut on twitter. Musk can't keep his trap shut on twitter. People in entertainment and athletics, who confuse their popularity among viewers on television who are merely trying to keep from thinking by consuming mindless entertainment, now think themselves important and are yapping away on twitter. Who cares? STFU and get on with your life, is my feeling. Now I'll stop yapping on slashdot instead of twitter ;-)

    47. Re:Jerk or genius? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. There are 7 companies on the planet that can pull $230m out of their liquid assets and not notice it

      Inquiring minds wish to know. Which seven?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    48. Re:Jerk or genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So....I guess you started shorting in July? Because that's when all of your comments here turned to negative Tesla diatribes.

      Following the money is always the easiest way to know one's true intentions.

      And, heh, I get it, you're working for the money. Now that you have money on the line, you want Tesla to fail. But we all lose if Tesla fails. We all want and need freedom from oil.

    49. Re:Jerk or genius? by theskipper · · Score: 1

      April, based on the balance sheet. Then rolling puts based on the poor manufacturing quality, executive exodus, bond yield crash, etc.

      No worries about freedom from oil. The offerings from Jaguar, Mercedes, and Audi will supplant Tesla and drastically increase adoption with more affordable models. Long some NIO too.

      Love the electric car concept, definitely planning on buying one of the aforementioned three when the time is right.

  2. He's losing it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course, a lot of that threshold is crossed not that much by him but by the public perception, but the overall effects will be indistinguishable in the long run. I hope he manages to claw back on this. Because it would really be a pity if not.

    1. Re:He's losing it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would it be a pity? We lambast CEOs and corporations all the time here so Musk should not get a pass for being irresponsible.

    2. Re:He's losing it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Musk, like the late Jobs, gets a pass in my book exactly because of "being irresponsible" in the sense of putting a wager on something others have chickened out on, and pulling through. These tweets are not problematic because of being "irresponsible" but because of being childish. They are not taking risks for unguaranteed but potentially considerable gains. They are taking risks for farts.

    3. Re:He's losing it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs knew not to have debt.

    4. Re: He's losing it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs also had leverage on microsoft and threatened to sue to stay financially afloat.

    5. Re: He's losing it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He gets a pass because he is literally trying to change the world. While we stit on our sofas saying I wish we had affordable solar power, and electric cars, and had a real space program like they predicted in the 60â(TM)s, and major car companies sit back on their fat SUV profits saying no one can build an electric car that will sell, he is trying to do that.

      Yeah, looking objectively at the financials probably doesnâ(TM)t look so good, but strong visionaries are more likely to drive to success, we as a species need this kick to succeed, and I am more than willing to risk some of my money as an investment in all of our future.

      You can argue that he is very close to succeeding in changing the world even if everything falls apart now. Access to space is cheaper than ever and people are getting excited again. Not only are electric vehicles in high demand but established car companies are investing real money. I donâ(TM)t know if weâ(TM)ve reached a tipping point yet where those car companies would go ahead even without the push from Tesla, but itâ(TM)s getting close.

      The challenges always change over time and my worries are more about whether someone good at one thing can adapt to another - Tesla has overcome challenges of building an outstanding EV, inspired change, building a company where you canâ(TM)t build companies, competing with those who say itâ(TM)s impossible, but now the challenge is switching to competing with established multi-billion dollar companies, expanding beyond enthusiastic early adopters to everyone , switching from revolutionary change to continuous evolution, etc. itâ(TM)s a different challenge and will consume so eone full time, but what if that someone is also pursuing other revolutionary ideas to change the world?

    6. Re: He's losing it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? When did jobs have leverage on m$?

    7. Re: He's losing it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody is sitting on their couches wanting those thing. And he is offering NONE of those things.

  3. Mercedes sales decline by McGruber · · Score: 1, Interesting

    (while sales of the Mercedes-Benz C-Class are down 28 percent through September)

    The Mercedes dealership in Atlanta is basically a huge, 4 story parking garage. About half of the front bottom level is the dealer showroom and there is big facade on the front of the building, so it doesn't quite look like a typical parking garage. The other half of the front of the building is the entrance to the service area -- I think it is about two big garage doors wide. If you drive by before the Dealership opens at (I think) 8 am, you'll see a line of Mercedes cars waiting to get into the service area. I notice the line because it frequently backs up out into the travel lanes on Piedmont Road.

    This Mercedes dealership is in a very new and shiny building, probably less than 10 years old, so I was really surprised a couple months ago when I saw construction workers tearing down the front facade of the building -- why would such a new building need major repairs already? It turned out they were installing a giant window on the top deck. The dealership now usually parks a C-class and another car behind that window, and they keep them lit up in spotlights 24/7. It's not a very tasteful display -- it's really a tacky, 3-D billboard, but I guess it is not considered a billboard because it is part of the building.

    Anyway, thanks to the design of their building, whenever I pass by this Mercedes dealership, I think tacky product that needs to be frequently brought in for fixing. I am not surprised that their sales are down 28-percent.

    I do not own any TSLA stock, nor am I shorting it.

    1. Re:Mercedes sales decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit Tesla’s spend more time in the shop than on the road.

    2. Re:Mercedes sales decline by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "The dealership now usually parks a C-class and another car behind that window, and they keep them lit up in spotlights 24/7. It's not a very tasteful display "

      Sure, in Amsterdam's red light district they show whores for hire exactly the same way.
      Very tasteful.

    3. Re:Mercedes sales decline by Cederic · · Score: 1

      you'll see a line of Mercedes cars waiting to get into the service area
      [...]
      needs to be frequently brought in for fixing

      I own a mercedes car. I bought it second hand, several years ago.

      It gets love and attention from the service team several times a year. There's the annual or mileage service, there's the Government mandated MOT, there's the way I abuse the tyres and brakes. This year there was the fuck-off big pothole I hit in France that buckled a wheel.

      Mercedes sell a lot of cars. Why the fuck would anything I've mentioned above, multiplied by the number of cars they sell, lead you to assume that they're in need of frequent fixing?

      Your logic is flawed.

    4. Re: Mercedes sales decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 2012 Mercedes has been the most unreliable car, never been so often to the dealer, never paid so much for repairs.

    5. Re: Mercedes sales decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So ok that anecdote is nice n all but this is our semi-weekly Musk-isa-nutball-lunatic thread. Nothing to do with Mercedes.

  4. Elon Musk, any more quotes about the big bad SEC ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [It is said that Elon Musk reads Slashdot and there is strong suspicion about what his username is. I'm not including that username here in case that information is wrong.]

    Do you have any more, erm, "unique" quotes you want to share about the SEC (and your opinions of them) ?

    Your last one got quite a bit of coverage... :-)

    On the more serious side, you once rather suddenly dismissed an employee that had apparently shown amazing loyalty to you, claiming it was time for her to move on. I strongly disagree with the way you did that BTW.

    However, have you considered that you yourself might need a break so that you can come back recharged and ready for new challenges ?

  5. Tweets? Really? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now we gotta have news stories on the front page about ANOTHER jackoff's tweets? You know, for a group of nerds who are supposedly above the plebian social media, we sure do hear a lot about tweets around here.

    I thought this was a tech site and not just another outlet for billionaires' bullshit.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re: Tweets? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the plebian tech website.

  6. SEC PEDOS Cant Keep FElon Down!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PEDOS.

  7. Don't speak unless spoken to. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    "Terms of the settlement included requiring Tesla to rein in Musk's social-media communications, but it was unclear when Tesla intends to implement that.... The settlement has yet to be court-approved."

    "In exchange for not having to admit guilt, you agree to give us money and give up your First Amendment rights."

    Yeah, that's not gonna work for me. Because it implicates speech, the government should be forced to prove the crime in court, and thus that the speech was part of the crime (like advertising illegal drugs or fraud)...or give up on restricting speech.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Don't speak unless spoken to. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a settlement, not a sentence. It's a contract. People restrict their own speech in contracts all the time.

    2. Re:Don't speak unless spoken to. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 2

      The government was quite happy yo go to court, they *agreed* to this as part of a settlement. Said agreement is still under scrutiny by the court for being too lenient.

    3. Re:Don't speak unless spoken to. by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

      The fact that Mr. Musk and Tesla decided $40 million in fines is a less expensive proposition than paying lawyer fees to defend themselves in court speaks volumes about the advice they got.

      The SEC attempt to influence Tesla with the least drastic measures is actually very responsible - had Tesla kept its part of the bargain, the stake holders would have been exposed to significantly less uncertainty and volatility.

      Regretfully, it seems Mr. Musk has seen the writing on the wall and is trying desperately to get fired before the crash and burn, so that he can pretend from outside that it wasn't his fault. Sadly for him, his lapdog board will not fire him because they desperately do not want to bear the blame.

    4. Re:Don't speak unless spoken to. by ledow · · Score: 1

      You don't "settle" unless you know that the consequences of not settling would be much worse.

      It's a voluntary agreement to avoid - what must be almost inevitable - formal charges.

      Not even an idiot like Musk "settles" for that kind of money / restriction without having considered the alternative.

      If anything, I think that "settling" with a government entity should be what's illegal. Much like the UK tax authority (HMRC) "settling out of court" with people like Facebook and Apple on their unpaid tax.

      Shouldn't be allowed... if you have evidence of a crime, convict them.

  8. Re:Tweets? Really? by gravewax · · Score: 1

    Tesla's official announcements come from tweets, so unlike other social media they are actually very relevant, hence why the fucktard is in trouble over his tweets. Personally I suspect he has just taunted the bull one too many times now, DOJ were probably looking at saying the settlement was enough, but he has immediately shown contempt for that and that he really was after the shorters so I expect criminal charges are on their way for him now. Musk has really lost it.

  9. Musk Rat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Musk will rot in jail ... on Mars!

    Go ahead - mod this down Elon you crazy old fuck

  10. Sales, what sort of sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought many were still waiting for delivery of pre orders. So is he simply delivering on previous pre orders, or is he actually selling more new orders? Selling sedans is not exactly the best selling type of vehicle anymore for any manufacture. Musk might be brilliant be he's got that car salesman smooth talking down to a science. I don't believe a word he says anymore.

    1. Re:Sales, what sort of sales by Rei · · Score: 2

      Both preorders and new orders, but only for a small subset: US and Canada only, LR, PUP, non-lease, no air suspension, no tow package. Tesla is preparing for both their European launch and production of a broader range of options shortly. Pre-orders have priority, but only for within their config and market.

      Sedans come before crossovers because they require less batteries for the same range. So long as you can sell as many as you can make, that's what you want first. Whenever you become demand limited, rather than supply limited, that's when you focus on crossovers.

      --
      "Close the door! What, were you born in a barn?" -- Police chief, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
    2. Re:Sales, what sort of sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sales like how Tesla sold their entire fleet of loaner vehicles to Enterprise rent a car in an attempt to inflate their sales numbers.

    3. Re: Sales, what sort of sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sooooo... in English this time, you are saying he is not building the pre-orders, mostly from people who gave him money YEARS ago but is instead building some random ego-soothing mishmash of cars. Got it now, thanks!

    4. Re: Sales, what sort of sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. I can't you idiots actually pay for this shit.

  11. SHort sellers are never a concern. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    People who short the stock of have absolutely no affect on a company' operations. None.

    Musk likes using short sellers as a distraction from the fact that Tesla is losing money, is cash flow negative and is buried in debt beyond a healthy level. Of course anyone pointing out those facts are called "trolls" or "shorts". Which he then bullies along with his cult following those people. What he did to that analyst during that conference call and to the blogger Montana Skeptic was just pure asshole.

    And calling legitimate questions about financials "bonehead questions" instead of answering them is a big red flag. And when you add in the fact that CFOs don't stay put is another red flag. Tesla has some huge problems and those Model 3s are going to do shit.

    The focus on the Model 3 deliveries is another distraction.

    Also remember that Model S sales have tanked and there's all the Solarcity - the company that Musk bought from his relatives - debt that has to be handled.
    Tesla has only been around for as long as it has because Musk keeps getting people to put more money into it. Tesla is not a sustainable business. And I have a sneaky suspicion that Q3 isn't going to be that good - more losses and negative cash flows - because all the press is about Model 3 production numbers. "Ignore the books! Look at all the cars I'm making! Oh! And forget that I said I was going to make 500,000 in 2018!"

    Musk should be making 125,000 cars a quarter and he is very very short.

    I don't see what the fanboys cannot or refuse to understand this. The Tesla fanboys are just like Creationists in that they refuse any information or facts that contradict their worldview. And the fanboy worldview is that Tesla is the most successful auto maker ever which

    1. Re:SHort sellers are never a concern. by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      People who short the stock of have absolutely no affect on a company' operations. None.

      Shorting inherently reduces the stock value. Hence, your argument is that the stock value has no effect on a company's operations. But this is obviously false; many things related to a company's ability to raise capital or obligations related to existing debt are tied to the company's stock price. Hence, shorting a stock inherently - on its own - hinders a company's finances.

      Beyond this, however, shorting a company creates a strong incentive toward spreading FUD against a company. Indeed, this is the entire means by which "activist short sellers" such as Jim Chanos and Andrew Left operate. Activist short sellers coordinate their short positions with a negative PR campaigns against their targets. These can range from the aboveboard, such as interviews, to the nefarious, such as paying off "independent" analysts to write negative reports (such as what Chanos got caught doing in his Fairfax campaign), to the amateur, like the regular astroturfing campaigns we get on the Tesla forums.

      When faced with an activist short campaign, companies have a few options. One is privatization. We saw how that went re: Tesla. The other is to decrease the company's dependence on outside capital, and thus decrease the significance of its stock price on the company's operations and to raise its credit score. While this is an effective strategy, it strongly hinders the company's growth rate. A company fighting off a short campaign in this manner has to heavily cut back on its least profitable activities and its investments in the future and instead focus only on its most profitable activities.

      As for the rest of your post:

      "Tesla is losing money": "Is" is a present tense verb. Meaning past Q3. We have not seen the Q3 report yet. The goal was to become sustainably profitable in Q3. We'll know in four weeks if it was a hit or a near miss.

      "is buried in debt beyond a healthy level": Tesla's debt-to-equity ratio is 60% that of Ford's. I know some people will argue that, "Well, with the traditional automakers you shouldn't count their financing divisions, as they're profit-makers!". But their financial divisions are an essential part of their operations. When comparing companies, you compare all of their components, not just the fractions you want to. And more to the point, the traditional automakers' debt is a lot more risky than Tesla's. Defaulting on auto loans is one of the first things that happens during a financial downturn.

      "Of course anyone pointing out those facts are called "trolls" or "shorts". Which he then bullies along with his cult following those people"": Irony alert: Sentence 1: Stop name calling! Sentence 2: Practice name calling!

      What he did to that analyst during that conference call: Which analyst? One asked a question that was literally answered right at the top of the Q1 report that everyone was supposed to have read before joining the call. Boldfaced. By re-asking Tesla about that, he was basically accusing them of lying. The other was pushing a conspiracy theory that Tesla's demand was running out. It's five months later and it still hasn't happened, so clearly it was a boneheaded question.

      " and to the blogger Montana Skeptic was just pure asshole.": Meh. Musk knew his boss. His boss was an early supporter and fan of Tesla.

      "And when you add in the fact that CFOs don't stay": Tesla's CFO has been with the company since 2008.

      "Also remember that Model S sales have tanked": They clearly have not, as per the delivery report. They increased over last quarter, and are well on their way to Tesla's max annual 100k S+X production capacity.

      "I have a sneaky suspicion that Q3 isn't going to be that good" - Please mortgage your house and short the company, since you both hate Tesla and love short selling.

      --
      "Close the door! What, were you born in a barn?" -- Police chief, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
    2. Re:SHort sellers are never a concern. by theskipper · · Score: 1

      "Shorting inherently reduces the stock value."

      Incorrect. For every share that is shorted, a new long share is created. The total net outstanding shares remains the same. Therefore the stock "value" nor any common shareholder's voting rights are affected.

    3. Re:SHort sellers are never a concern. by Rei · · Score: 2

      When you short a stock, you take a share that wasn't available for sale, and make it available for sale. You increase the supply on the market. The laws of supply and demand dictate a price drop. When you cover, you take a share that was available for sale and take it off the market. You decrease the supply on the market. This correspondingly dictates a price rise.

      --
      "Close the door! What, were you born in a barn?" -- Police chief, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
    4. Re:SHort sellers are never a concern. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every short is accompanied by an offer to buy after a short period of time. That's how short selling works. So while you might temporarily increase the number of shares to buy the very first time someone does short selling, over time the number of shares for sale remains exactly the same.

      Study after study has shown that short selling has no effect on stock price beyond advertising the fact someone out there doesn't like the stock. And that can just as easily be done by saying "I'm not touching Tesla's crappy stock, and I'm going to write this 5,000 word article on why."

    5. Re:SHort sellers are never a concern. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not how short selling works, you actually need buyers of your shorts, not of the shares themselves. short selling has zero effect on share price, this is not opinion it is well researched fact. now some of the disinformation they propagate you could justifiably argue has an affect but the act of short selling does not.

    6. Re:SHort sellers are never a concern. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shorting a company creates a strong incentive toward spreading FUD against a company.

      Long positions creates a strong incentive towards spreading hype for a company Rei

      That is what you do here on every Tesla article. Every. Last. One.

    7. Re: SHort sellers are never a concern. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Shorting is a neutral act. It doesn't affect stock price. What may affect stock price is that these investors have an incentive to put out negative stories about Tesla. At the moment though Musk is doing a pretty fine job of this himself.

    8. Re: SHort sellers are never a concern. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Yup, Tesla has a LOT of kool aid drinkers. The really is between these extremes.

    9. Re:SHort sellers are never a concern. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only naked short selling would reduce the stock price (and even then only in case the person shorting is right that the value is too high, otherwise he/she just loses money), and that is illegal almost everywhere.

    10. Re:SHort sellers are never a concern. by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

      No, shorting does not reduce "stock value".

      The value of the stock is the net present value of its future revenue stream.

      The factors, or the independent variables that influence the stock value are the profit margins, the market share, the qualify of management, the products, etc. These are things that no "shorts" have influence over, this is exclusively Elon Musk's province.

      The stock value is not an independent variable in the mix, it is a dependent variable, and whether it goes up or down is the result of good or bad financial results, sound or unsound management, good or abysmal customer service, sales volume that generates enough revenue and products built so that they are profitable when sold at the produced volumes.

      The stock price, on which the shorts bet is a dependent variable in this equation. It depends on the views on the fundamental, intrinsic stock value by the different players in the stock market. The stock price, however, does not influence the "value", except when it is allowed to do so by the company's management, for example, when the company borrows on a bet of the future stock price.

    11. Re:SHort sellers are never a concern. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that it cancels out. Well I suppose a stopped clock is right twice a day.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:SHort sellers are never a concern. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon has only been around for as long as it has because Bezos keeps getting people to put more money into it.

      That was true for Amazon for around 20 years...

      numbnuts

  12. There's another outstanding SEC investigation by fozzy1015 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What people forget is that before the '420 tweet' investigation was announced, there was already an open investigation into Musk's Model 3 production promises. And don't forget the DoJ has an open investigation. If the issues with the feds were settled then why the rant and why now hire a law firm that specializes in defending its clients from fraud? https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

    1. Re:There's another outstanding SEC investigation by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      Elon Musk has made mortal enemies of a lot of extremely powerful people. The international energy and aerospace groups would like him and his ideas go away. Today's environment makes it too easy and tempting for cheaters to spread fake news.

      The SEC should investigate Bloomberg's "sources" of information. One disputed story and a tech stock drops by 50%. I'm willing to bet their anonymous sources benefit in stock market swings.

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    2. Re: There's another outstanding SEC investigation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. You and rei need to seek help. You are like children deflecting blame.

  13. Re:Tweets? Really? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Tesla's official announcements come from tweets, so unlike other social media they are actually very relevant, hence why the fucktard is in trouble over his tweets

    So? Tesla's "official announcements" are just press releases, meant to boost their stock price. Why are they being reported on Slashdot.

    And it's not his "tweets" that have gotten Elon Musk's dick caught in a wringer, but the fact that he tried to game his stock value by claiming the company was going private. It's not the tweet that was illegal, it was the behavior - the thing he did. Twitter got nothin' to do with it.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  14. Response from Tesla Fanboys' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What people forget is that before the '420 tweet' investigation was announced, there was already an open investigation into Musk's Model 3 production promises. And don't forget the DoJ has an open investigation. If the issues with the feds were settled then why the rant and why now hire a law firm that specializes in defending its clients from fraud?

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

    *puts fingers in ears* Lalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalalal

    Elon Musk is a god. He is perfect!

    1. Re: Response from Tesla Fanboys' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He is perfect!"

      No. But he is a real American hero. Whereas his haters are parasitic worms.

    2. Re: Response from Tesla Fanboys' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is neither American nor a hero.

    3. Re: Response from Tesla Fanboys' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is american. He has citizenship. He' smore american than trump.

    4. Re: Response from Tesla Fanboys' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that child attitude is why Trump got elected, has won almost every fight with the left/marxists and will get re-elected in a 2020 landslide.

      I did not vote for him in 16 because I did not believe him. I do now. He is for real. He is exactly what this country needed at the right time to save us from the truly evil Marxist trash that now permeates so many key government positions. Thank you for your fundamental transformation, Obama, you evil fuck. Trump is ripping out your cancer.

    5. Re: Response from Tesla Fanboys' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww, poor baby, your bitterness is showing. Are your aerospace and auto stocks not on track for your retirement? So sad!

      Elon wasn't born in the United States, but he is an American. Your ancestors weren't born in the United States either, are you an American?

      Fact: Elon has succeeded in bringing a no compromise affordable electric car to the market before any other auto manufacturer.

      Fact: Elon Musk is also responsible for assembling the SpaceX team and technology that has dropped launch costs significantly.

  15. Re:Tweets? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because Telsa is a disruptive technology company in the hands of a moron that seems hell bent and sending it to the graveyard and himself to jail.

  16. German cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think German cars are designed for the leasing market - people who keep their cars 3 years max. Mercedes, BMW, Audi.

    Here's another anecdote, this guy bought a Mercedes $100K+ something or another and at 56,000 miles the transmission goes out. He brings it into the dealer and they say, "Yep, it's broke. It'll be $7,000 to fix."

    Guy says, "What?! It only has 56K on it! Isn't it under warranty?!"

    "Nope! It's 3 years, 36,000 miles."

    1. Re:German cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My SO drives a Mercedes that's a bit more than 25 years old (the W124 chassis, E series), equipped to using LPG gas. It has something like 95hp and an automatic transmission and it really is a bear pulling a horse small trailer with 2 large ponies in it (about the maximum load of 1600kg including trailer). The point is that she previously had a Hyandai with sth like 150hp that pretended to be able to pull the same kind of load but wrecked its clutch doing so twice within a few weeks. So she gave it back at a loss and got the Mercedes (at age 20 or so) because, well, it's what we call a "Bauernschaukel" (a boor's ride) here. It fights but it comes through. Yes, it needed repairs over the years. No, not $7000.

      I remember having to switch a direction sign lamp on a previous car of hers (some other Japanese). It required going through one fender in a procedure fortunately described in the car manual and taking quite a bit of time.

      I had the same operation with the Mercedes (it announced the broken bulb on the dashboard). So I open the hood in trepidation. There is a plastic box with all the lamps on each side, closed with a metal lever. You pull the lever back. The back of the box can now be tilted back. All the lamps are mounted there in a single plate, labelled with the type you need for replacement.

      I believe they don't do things like that these days anymore. It was a hat tip from engineer to engineer, like the detailed circuit diagrams and color adjustment instructions in a satchel in old TV sets.

      I think that's the kind of thing that got them their reputation. They may not have had the reliability record of Japanese cars, but they were built for maintenance so it didn't matter all that much.

      No manufacturer including Mercedes wants a car to last that long nowadays.

    2. Re: German cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must be why almost every 20+ year old car in regular use is German...

    3. Re: German cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must be why almost every 20+ year old car in regular use is German...

      That was 20 years ago. I'm talking about NOW in the last few years.

      I KNOW about those Mercedes that have a MILLION miles on them that were bought in the 1970s. I have see them.

      I am talking about in the last few years. And why don't they stand behind their product? Maybe that guy I was talking about just had a dick dealer, but really.

      Geeze!

    4. Re: German cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let’s see if any shit Tesla is still on the road in 20 years.

    5. Re: German cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'll grant you that old jetta's seem somehow immortal while simultaneously falling apart, but they are far outnumbered by civics and corollas for old cars

    6. Re: German cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not here. Anything Japanese of that age has either rusted away or became too expensive to get through inspection a long time ago.

    7. Re: German cars by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There's a name for that. I think it's called survivorship bias.

      Are there any Victorian houses where you live? I bet they're all solidly built. They built shit houses in the old days too, but those all fell down so you don't see them.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  17. WRong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Without insider knowledge shorts are nothing but pure gambling, ...

    Shorts are accountants and lawyers and others who really analyze a company's books. They knew about Enron and Lehman before they crashed.

    We don't wake up one day and say, "I hate Tesla. Musk is a jerk! Rei flamed me! I'm gonna short!!"

    Tesla is losing money, it's cash flow negative and it's piled high in debt - for starters. It can only operate with continuous cash infusions. And it's priced at $270+ a share.

    OK?

    A company like that and off of the top of my head, I think a fair market value is about $40ish a share.

    Tesla is incredibly overpriced in our opinion. That is all.

    It's NOT Tesla hate. It's not Musk hate - although, I do resent him for the way he treated that analyst months ago that he apologized to.
    It's just accounting and cold calculation.

    Musk is the one who is making it personal and emotional - which doesn't reflect very well on him - another problem with Tesla: management.

    Sorry, but the odds are stacked in the shorts favor. It's just a matter of when the market changes its mind.

    I do not know what fanboys refuse to understand this. They're not stupid.

  18. Wrong incentive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A picture etched on glass and shot into space where no one is ever going to see it? How about "For every referral, I'll shut up for a week?"

  19. He's delivering to a years-long waiting list by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Model 3 "sales" metric right now is actually how many he's able to produce to satisfy purchasing decisions people made a long time ago, not how many people went out and made a purchasing decision today.

    I don't see how the head-to-head comparison against current sales data of other cars could be meaningful without knowing whether the Model 3 waiting list is growing, shrinking, or staying about the same.

    1. Re:He's delivering to a years-long waiting list by bgarcia · · Score: 1

      Tesla - to this day - still hasn't paid any money to advertise their product.

      None.

      Pick just about any magazine off the shelf and count how many Ford advertisements you see in it. Watch an hour-long TV program and count the number of Chevy commercials shown. Think about how much money traditional automakers spend on advertising. And realize that the only reason they spend that much is because it *works* to create more demand for their product. That advertising is worth the cost to generate sales.

      If demand for Teslas ever slows down to below their production capacity, all they have to do is start advertising just a little bit. The short seller's "no demand" thesis is one of the least-believable ones out there.

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    2. Re:He's delivering to a years-long waiting list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla - to this day - still hasn't paid any money to advertise their product.

      None.

      LOL. Explain the Tesla shills on Slashdot then. Do they work for free? I don't think so.

    3. Re:He's delivering to a years-long waiting list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. When was the last time you saw a commercial for Ferrari or Lamborghini? Or any car that's in the $120,000 to $200,000 range?

      Tesla's main target market is the wealthy and the technologically savvy, mostly the type to be living in Southern California. They're not the ones that are watching cable television or reading magazines, they'll be on reddit and youtube. That's where Teslas putting their advertising, not directly but in tech talks and then letting youtubers and the like hype up their products for them.

      If Tesla was targeting the same market then I'd be willing to bet that they'll spend the money for conventional advertising.

    4. Re:He's delivering to a years-long waiting list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi. I'm a Tesla shill on Slashdot, and many other places. I am not paid by Tesla, or anyone else.

      I'm also not alone.

      Think whatever you want. You'll likely be wrong.

    5. Re:He's delivering to a years-long waiting list by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You can't compare waiting lists to other car manufacturers who don't have them as waiting lists introduce an additional variable on demand (wanting it now, and cognitive dissonance to name two of those variables). Additionally the "healthy" view of a waiting list for a company like Tesla would be for the waiting list to steadily reduce, but that would play into the opposite narrative you're trying to judge.

    6. Re:He's delivering to a years-long waiting list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla - to this day - still hasn't paid any money to advertise their product.

      None.

      LOL. Explain the Tesla shills on Slashdot then. Do they work for free? I don't think so.

      I sometimes post nice things about Tesla on Slashdot. I don't work for the company, don't get paid by them, I just like the cars. That's it.

    7. Re:He's delivering to a years-long waiting list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla's don't cost $120,000. False equivalence.

      Model 3 is directly competing with tons of models that are advertised often. Same with the S and X.

      numbnuts

  20. My bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was "just" a finance executive.

    They clearly have not, as per the delivery report. They increased over last quarter, and are well on their way to Tesla's max annual 100k S+X production capacity.

    Compare it to last year.

    Please mortgage your house and short the company, since you both hate Tesla and love short selling.

    Yep, gonna do that on Monday.

    What he did to that analyst during that conference call: Which analyst? One asked a question that was literally answered right at the top of the Q1 report that everyone was supposed to have read before joining the call. Boldfaced. By re-asking Tesla about that, he was basically accusing them of lying. The other was pushing a conspiracy theory that Tesla's demand was running out. It's five months later and it still hasn't happened, so clearly it was a boneheaded question.

    That's complete bullshit. And even it that were true, why did Musk feel the need to apologize? Seriously Karen, you can do better than that.

    And as far as to what you know about financing a company: nothing. Again, shorts have NO affect on a company's performance. None.

    Tesla is SOOOOO overpriced that it's a bubble.

    But this's my entertainment. You don't really think you're making a difference in investor's impression of Musk or Tesla do you? Yeah, you get a lot of karma here on Slashdot but do you think you are swaying minds at Fidelity, T Rowe, or the fund that back Musk? I come here and play but the fact is that you and this website are nothing but a stinky fart next to a volcano vent.

    Oh! And if by some miracle Tesla shows a profit at the end of this month, I'll be reaping the cash too because I hedge - which is something Musk doesn't understand. For someone who is supposed to be a genius, he's quite ignorant about risk mitigation.

    So darling ... I fantasize that you're some dark haired beautiful Icelandic beauty with big blue eyes and I know for a fact, wicked intelligent - I don't mind your posts at all.

    But from what I see, Tesla has serious issues and I'm still sticking to my timelines: Tesla busts by the end of 2018.

    Do I want it? Yep, I like being right.
    Do I want those workers to lose their jobs? Nope. I'd take Musk's dick up my ass to prevent that.

    Do I acknowledge reality? Yep. And you don't. I have the financials on my side and you have nothing but Musk's bullshit.

    1. Re:My bad... by Rei · · Score: 2

      Compare it to last year.

      26150 S+X Q3 last year vs. 27660 S+X Q3 this year, you mean? Not like it matters. Tesla has the battery supply to make about ~100k S+X per year. Doesn't matter what quarter they move them, that's their cap.

      Please mortgage your house and short the company, since you both hate Tesla and love short selling.

      Yep, gonna do that on Monday.

      Be sure not to cover before the Q3 report ;)

      That's complete bullshit

      Simple, readily cross-referencable facts are bullshit. Got it.

      why did Musk feel the need to apologize

      Did you see what the stock did after the Q1 call?
      Did you see what the stock did after the Q2 call?
      Would you apologize for billions of dollars?

      --
      "Close the door! What, were you born in a barn?" -- Police chief, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
    2. Re: My bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deflection. He said model S sales. NOT S+X sales. Care to try again after getting caught out on yet another lie-via-distraction?

    3. Re:My bad... by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      But if you have a long position there is a strong incentive to hype the stock which means that people will buy it when it's overpriced and probably lose money when it returns to more realistic levels. If you drive up the price by lying, I think that should count as fraud. Such lies might include, for instance, telling the World that you have somebody who will buy all the extant shares for $420 when they are currently trading at $360.

      Also, if you have a long position, unless you are in it as a long term investment, you have a strong incentive to pressure the management into taking short term profits at the expense of investment for the future. And people with a long position have the ability to fire the directors. It's these people who can get Elon Musk fired, not the short sellers.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  21. Shorts need to be killed with fire and sticks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill the brain dead short idiots and kill the sec idiots and kill all shorts

  22. burn out by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    I think he has been acting like somebody going towards a major mid-life burn out from working too hard with too much stress... He likely copes with his problems with more work / obsessing and now he is in a situation where he's pushed himself too far for too long and he is coping with it by pushing himself more. He is also older and has been doing the stuff for many years to himself.

    Drugs may become a part of that downward spiral but they do not need to be before he ends up needing a vacation in a padded room... A nervous breakdown or some other similar mental condition looks to be around the corner. He might end up more like Howard Hues, if he is lucky or he could end up overdosing... His family doesn't seem to be curbing him yet; it could turn around. All these things are not permanent (except death) and nobody is super human. Most of us wouldn't cope like him by working like he is; some would curb our activities or develop other bad coping mechanisms like alcoholism or spousal abuse..

  23. Re:Tweets? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to 'Merica, the country which is an outlet for billionaires' bullshit.

  24. Sedan market has collapsed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sedan market has massively shrunk in the last year with sales migrating to SUVs, it's not just Mercedes. If you look at total Mercedes sales there's nothing close to a 28% drop. You can see similar drops for other sedans as well. It's got to the point where some sedans have either left or taken a break from sale. Then there's the fact that Tesla are delivering on back orders that were made prior to the switch in market preference.

    In summary, being fifth in this market segment may appear impressive at first glance, but two thirds of their current models are in a rapidly dwindling market segment. Soon they should be even higher by default, but that's not a good thing long term.

    1. Re:Sedan market has collapsed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, sedans are a small market today. Ford makes two; mustang and something else... focus I think.

      Still, there is no reason Tesla's product can't translate to SUVs. Except that they probably can't build enough of them.

    2. Re: Sedan market has collapsed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have a SUV in the X, it has sales but nothing to boast about. Tesla make or break is the 3, which missed buyer preferencesfor car type.

  25. The irony by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Every time Musk moans about these "value destroyers", or tweets something dumb to stick it to them, his own stock tanks. If he wants to build value he should learn to shut up.

    1. Re:The irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a suspicion that the's just doing the stock trading two step by proxy. He talks smack about shorts, the stock tanks and some friends make money when they cover. All they need to do is keep the SEC from finding out...

      Seriously, Musk needs to just run the company and forget about short sellers. They are ultimately not responsible for the stock price performance, he is though is management of the business. Getting upset with them and venting about it on Twitter is misplaced and a waste of his time and talents. It's also this Twitter thing that gets him in legal trouble with the SEC. He needs to turn over his Twitter account to the PR department and find another way to deal with his stresses or he's going to end up in a padded room or jail cell arranged by the SEC.

  26. Trump supporters hate Musk being a jerk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet adore trump for "telling truth to power".
    No thin line for them: if you're their leader, you're golden, no matter what.

  27. Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They have no influence on your profitability,"
    Bollocks. Share prices drop due to short sellers, so your available cash which is what shares fucking well are, drops, so you can't spend that cash to help pay for the outgoings.

    1. Re:Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They have no influence on your profitability," Bollocks. Share prices drop due to short sellers, so your available cash which is what shares fucking well are, drops, so you can't spend that cash to help pay for the outgoings.

      What? Short sellers do NOT push the price of a stock down, unless it's already headed down, in which case it helps STABILIZE the price by proving wiling buyers as the price sinks. It also pushes the price UP when the price is rising, providing more buyers who are trying to close their short position in a panic to keep from loosing more money.

      Short sellers add to the upward volatility of a stock's price and suppress the downward movement.

    2. Re:Bullshit. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      your available cash which is what shares fucking well are

      That's an ... interesting point of view. One not taught on most conventional accounting courses.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Short sellers do NOT push the price of a stock down, unless it's already headed down, in which case it helps STABILIZE the price by proving wiling buyers as the price sinks. It also pushes the price UP when the price is rising, providing more buyers who are trying to close their short position in a panic to keep from loosing more money.

      Short sellers add to the upward volatility of a stock's price and suppress the downward movement.

      You mentioned only the good side of shorts when the price is going down, but yet you again mentioned only good side of shorts when the price is going up. The other side effect when the price is going down is to make people, who own the stocks, panic and get them to sell. I don't know the ratio of this kind of people who own stocks, but it make me believe that there are more than those who want to buy at a lower price (or the price wouldn't be dropping so much). Even though it would help stabilizing the price at some point, it does not mean it would not cause the price to go down further.

      Similarly, when the price goes up, the similar group of people, who would be panic when the price is down, would want to jump in for the money. As a result, the price goes up higher than it should. Those who are sucker would be drawn into buying and could be the ones who lose money at the end. See how you emphasize the good part but ignore the bad part?

      There is a equilibrium in everything, and it depends on how you look at it. Regardless the stock price direction changes, there are always people who gain and those who lose. If you just look at it from only one direction, you are attempting to send a misleading message to convince other to agree with your bias.

  28. Utterly wrong the three of you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A short sells something you do not have. That makes an extra share that DOES NOT EXIST, What bullshit ignorant idiots you alt right haters are.

    1. Re:Utterly wrong the three of you. by DrXym · · Score: 2
      Alt right hater? Are you mentally ill or something?

      And nope, shorting does not involve imaginary stock. A short itself is a contract to sell stock to somebody at a particular price on a particular date. It's basically an IOU to the person buying it. When that date arrives, stock is purchased from the open market and given to the buyer. The hope for the short trader is sell it for more in the contract than its worth on the open market on the date the short matures.

  29. Re:Tweets? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because Telsa is a disruptive technology company

    Hahahaha. What has Tesla "technology" "disrupted" recently?

  30. Musk ... a little like Banksy, perhaps? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting so many investors are trash-talking Elon Musk and his unwillingness to just "pipe down and start acting like a typical, boring big business CEO". Yet you see all the praise of the street artist Banksy, when he trolled buyers at the Sotheby's auction with his self-shredding painting someone paid $1.4 million for.

    Of course, what we're going to see with that situation is that the value of the painting will almost DOUBLE thanks to those antics, and both Sotheby's and Banksy win tons of free publicity and name recognition.

    I feel like Musk is another one of the rebel, eccentrics who just wants to make and sell some cool products and do things that can change the world, in the long-run. If his insulting short-sellers and frank attacks of people who attacked his business models, efforts and idea first are a problem for you? Fine .... Go invest in any of thousands of boring, stable stocks for big businesses owned by stuffy people in suits.

    At the end of the day, what really matters is the ability to build and sell a product or a service that people want to buy. Tesla has succeeded in droves, making a car that many owners consider "the best automobile I've ever owned". And he's privatizing space travel with his OTHER business, which slowly makes NASA obsolete. Good stuff, in my book!

  31. no goatse in space? by psyclone · · Score: 1

    I came here expecting the first post to be about etching goatse on glass for future generations to enjoy. Yet not a single post that my simple search found.

    Sad.

  32. Re:Tweets? Really? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    You know, for a group of nerds

    Nerds are typically interested in people who do cool shit like launch things into space and shake up a 130 year old car industry with technology.