Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Police Get Power To Inspect ISPs (scmp.com)

China has issued a new regulation setting out wide-ranging police powers to inspect internet service providers and users, as the government tightens its grip on the country's heavily restricted cyberspace. Local media reports: Under the new rule, effective from November 1, central and local public security authorities can enter the premises of all companies and entities that provide internet services and look up and copy information considered relevant to cybersecurity. The regulation was issued by the Ministry of Public Security last month and released on its website on Sunday. It comes more than a year after a controversial cybersecurity law was introduced that has caused widespread concern among foreign companies operating in China. Despite its broad scope, the legislation gives few details about implementation, making it all the more difficult for companies trying to avoid its repercussions. Analysts said the new regulation sheds some light on how the law will be implemented. "That's obviously how Chinese laws go. First there is a big concept, then there is a sweeping law, and then implementing regulations will come in to flesh out the details," said William Nee, a China expert with Amnesty International.

24 of 50 comments (clear)

  1. The only surprise by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only surprise here is that they didn't already have the ability.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:The only surprise by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      and apple will just roll over to do any to be complacent with the law but helping the FBI is not in the cards for them!

    2. Re:The only surprise by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking. They can give themselves any power they want at any time. Honestly, any government can.

      It stated that "authorities can enter the premises of all companies and entities that provide internet services and look up and copy information considered relevant to cybersecurity". The U.S. government does this all the time with the mildly inconvenient requirement of a subpoena.

    3. Re:The only surprise by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Apple owns ISPs in China?

    4. Re:The only surprise by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Two different markets; two different strategies. (Explains Google's China strategy, too.)

      In the United States CONSUMERS want secure phones. Fuck what the gubmint wants.

      Apple makes money off secure shit.

      In China, the consumer is secondary to the gubmint. Apple plays by the rules and makes money.

      It's all about making money.

      If a market wants phones with cow shit on them, Apple has the XS and stuff ready to go.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  2. What a funny anti-China piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    considering the U.S. government has had this for a decade already, if not more, and can literally tap into any ISP, if you recall some of the NSA revelations in the last few years. But ofc when China can do it now, they go wild with their "police state" accusations.

    1. Re:What a funny anti-China piece by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But ofc when China can do it now, they go wild with their "police state" accusations.

      You know, I think the fact that they have been suppressing dissent and then hunting down dissidents to jail them might have something to do with that whole police state thing. Then again, maybe it's the re-education prisons that they are putting Muslims into. No wait, maybe it's the massive video surveillance network they are building out. Wait, no, I'm sure it's the social ranking system they are using keep "undesirables" from traveling or buying things.

      I'm sorry, it's just so hard to keep track of why people think China is a police state.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:What a funny anti-China piece by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Did I miss in the summary where it compared China to the US? Or do you feel like as long as a country does something the US did, it should not be reported?

    3. Re:What a funny anti-China piece by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Well, "literally" sure doesn't mean what it used to.

      By the way, NSA can't do shit to ISPs. They're not even allowed to admit they exist to an ISP, much less demand something.

      In the US, cops can't even come into the ISP's building without a search warrant.

      I'd say clue up, but that won't happen. I'll just stick to, "nope yer rong!"

  3. Police Power by PPH · · Score: 1

    I wish people would stop using this term. It's giving our policing organizations raging erections.

    In all but some societies under martial law, such powers are reserved for the courts.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  4. How about power to inspect registrars? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    I know this is about government abuses and the like here, but I would support more power of law enforcement to go after registrars (with a warrant, of course - not just on a whim). The companies that make the most money off of spamvertising - if you discount the spammers and the spambot armies themselves - are the domain name registrars. They are one of - if not the - most critical component in the chain of actually making money off of spam. Without a registrar, a spammer can't obfuscate the address of the spamvertised domain, and can't move it around when an ISP cracks down on their server. The registrars themselves have been playing hide-and-seek with domain owner information for years now, making it increasingly more difficult to figure out who owns the domains that are sending spam and directing spam business to. The registrars are happily spread all over the world (including plenty in foreign countries that don't give a shit about complaints from Americans) which means you need Interpol to get anything done (good luck with that!).

    If we could get some ability to go after the registrars - and don't let them pretend they don't know what's going on or that they somehow aren't making bank in the process - we could have a useful tool towards slowing down spam. Instead, ICANN and the like have moved us in exactly the opposite direction.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:How about power to inspect registrars? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      How about not?

      Seems to me that that sort of thing very quickly becomes the first step on a very slippery slope....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  5. Re: We need that here. by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    It's someone making fun of Trump supporters. "power to inspect there algoritms"? Yeah, this is something that comes up in normal folk speak.

  6. Who the fuck cares? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Why are we even talking about this?

    China is a sovereign country and it can do whatever it wants to do.

    That's true of the Google story, as well.

    It doesn't matter what China wants to do as long as capitalists can find a way to monetize it.

    Hell, give out personal data as a promotional item.

    Bribe the uppers.

    Whatever it takes to make a buck.

    Americans can't even protect its students, for crying out loud.

    Physician, heal thyself.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Who the fuck cares? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      FAT32 or NTFS?

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  7. So China is a shithole ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... country and America has a sexual predator as a leader.

    Who's throwing stones?

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re: So China is a shithole ... by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Correction: having a leader who is bombastic and when he was a reality TV star boasted to a crony that he was such a celebrity that he was surrounded by the sort of women that he can grab by the pussy.

      It's badly distorted by people who hate him the most.

    2. Re: So China is a shithole ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      FTFY

      ... having a leader who is bombastic and when he was a reality TV star boasted to a crony that he was such a celebrity that he could blame the victim ...

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:So China is a shithole ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      And that's your position?

      Lame.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    4. Re:So China is a shithole ... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      But wuddabout the Masons?
      Wuddabout the Illuminati?!

  8. Re: King Xi by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    That's easy: Anonymous Coward. Like, duh.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  9. Re:We need that here. by Sir+Lurkalot · · Score: 1

    With states like california and new york and there liberal biased companies like google and amazong hurting regular ever day americans who happen to have conservative views we need to have a way to fight them back. Many people I talk to say it would be great to get law enforcement the power to inspect there algoritms for bias and to fine them if they are censoring conservative speach.

    Troll botspeak if there ever was. Back in the USSR, troll,,,

  10. Big US tech brands by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    Are ready to help and support all decryption requests.
    Welcome to investing in Communism.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Big US tech brands by houghi · · Score: 2

      Yeah, because in the US the police has no access to the information. /s

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.