Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Rereleases Windows 10 October 2018 Update, Fixes Data Deletion Bug (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: Microsoft is re-releasing its Windows 10 October 2018 Update today, following the company pulling it offline due to data deletion issues over the weekend. The software giant says there were only a few reports of data loss, at a rate of one one-hundredth of one percent. "We have fully investigated all reports of data loss, identified and fixed all known issues in the update, and conducted internal validation," says Microsoft's John Cable, director of program management for Windows Servicing and Delivery. Microsoft is now re-releasing the Windows 10 October 2018 Update to Windows Insiders, before rolling it out more broadly to consumers. "We will carefully study the results, feedback, and diagnostic data from our Insiders before taking additional steps towards re-releasing more broadly," explains Cable.

It appears the bug that caused file deletion was related to Windows 10 users who had enabled Known Folder Redirection to redirect folders like desktop, documents, pictures, and screenshots from the default location. Microsoft introduced code in its latest update to delete the empty and duplicate known folders, but it appears they weren't always empty. Microsoft has developed fixes to address a variety of problems related to these folder moves, and these fixes are now being tested with Windows Insiders.

79 comments

  1. 0.01% by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We recently had an article that Windows 10 passed the 700 million install mark.

    700,000,000 installations. 0.01% of that is 'only' 70,000 installs that lost data.

    Doesn't fill me with confidence, especially after seeing the reason. It's not like hard drive space is costly these days, Windows should NOT take the initiative to do some spring cleaning without clear and explicit permission.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    1. Re:0.01% by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      Uh sure, if every single Windows 10 install installed the update. Redo your math with 699,999,999 installs, because my machine didn't update yet. (Your post features what I would call a rush to bad faith math.)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:0.01% by Calydor · · Score: 1

      My bad, I somehow managed to leave out 'potentially'.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re:0.01% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows "passed" the 700 million mark. So your failed install is one of the 9 million over 700 million. Talk about bad faith math.

    4. Re:0.01% by DewDude · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder if there were that many issues...or if those people yelled in to an echo chamber that just resonated out this same thing.

      I installed 1809 on the 4th and didn't have much data in any user folders since I had reinstalled to a new SSD 5 days prior. I backed up what I did have since reports said it seemed to happen if you'd "done stuff" to your user directories...like move them. I put mine on an external so I wouldn't fill the SSD with garbage. I suffered no data loss.

      Then again...I also don't log-in or use OneDrive.

    5. Re:0.01% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the fixed update restores the deleted data 'cause it's NTFS.
      So, unless the user reformatted their HD, the update will restore
      the previously deleted data -- easy peasy. MS thinks of everything... :)

      CAP === 'stapler'

    6. Re:0.01% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree. What multi-billion $ company (Billy - I'ma looking at you) would
      release an update to the public without having a way to back said update out.
      Amiright? Every position I've held in the last 20 years always had a backout
      requirement. My guess is that MS may want to charge you for your stupidity in
      selecting their product, but yes, the data hasn't "really" been deleted.
      Nobody could be that stupid as to send an update out to the public without a
      recovery plan - well, Indians are. Are there any working at MS - just curious...

    7. Re:0.01% by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      MS thinks of everything... :)

      Apart from testing, apparently
      .

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:0.01% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Change management 101:

      In any change where a step involves data deletion, ensure a backup exists, or do not proceed.

    9. Re:0.01% by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      They did not lose data. A secret feature of Windows anal probe 10, accidentally revealed itself in, 'delete all the users data mode', it's not a bug, it's a feature, it's just a broad test run, to confirm efficacy. The ability to delete all user data upon remote command from whom ever has access to windows anal probe 10 updates, which are never anonymous and each and every single individual update is uniquely identifiable and customisable, so some get normal mundane updates, some get firmware rewrites for monitoring, some get all their data deleted and some just get possibly copyright infringing files deleted and some get a copy of their files uploaded to master command program server for decompiling and their components added to the master control program ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    10. Re: 0.01% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how it's going to restore overwritten data, like for example the data overwritten by the downloading of the "fixed" update

    11. Re:0.01% by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      A very large portion of power users machines, and machines managed by power users, i.e. "family and friends" likely have auto updates nuked at this point. You just go there once a month or two to run updates after they have been tested by the hapless general public.

    12. Re:0.01% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Then again...I also don't log-in or use OneDrive.

      Here is my Win10 wish list.

      1. Have an easy setup option that lets me turn off onedrive, cortana, junk applications, advertisements, and any telemetry. It can be multiple options as long as i can just change them quickly. By turn off I mean not loaded at all.

      2. Auto save those choices against my install key, with an easy reinstall from a usb image downloaded from microsoft. In fact, let the download link be for that system with everything ready to go, including adding to the list any common applications that are freely available. Also add a description of the PC, and of course make sure everyone can log in and browse their licenses/transfer them to new hardware/etc. Basically make flatten and reload little more than a few simple steps.

      3. Make the built in antivirus provably at least as good as mcafee, and go on a long campaign to convince all fortune 500's to switch. I'm including full disk encryption in this. Seriously, I'd cheer if microsoft could finally destroy that abomination. It's sort of the borg destroying the thing even worse than the borg. Microsoft could be a hero.

      4. When you download a new install usb image from microsoft you get should get a fully updated system in say 30 minutes tops. A custom usb image like this should include what is needed for those settings. (If need be you can select the settings in a web page.) (You should be able to specify hardware or get it scanned and automatically get all drivers.)

      5. Provide standard iso images similar to the previous to load standard VMs, including having common microsoft software loaded by default (visual studio/git for example).

    13. Re:0.01% by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Considering that the average hard drive failure failure rate in a given month is around 0.4% that does make 0.01% pretty low. And if you actually lost data you should take this as a wakeup call that you only possibly lost the data and could undelete it as opposed to a hard drive failure which is 40x more likely and almost certainly will be impossible to recover the data from.

      It's not like hard drive space is costly these days

      Considering how many people are on SSDs, especially over priced Laptop SSDs, these days hard drive space is probably more expensive than it's been in decades.

    14. Re:0.01% by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      Maybe I should feel lucky that neither of my Windows 10 machines can update past the Fall 2017 release?

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    15. Re:0.01% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "rush to bad faith" accurately describes everything about Windows 10

    16. Re: 0.01% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feel free to create them and sell to the market. You'll be rich. No joking.

      Otherwise stop complaining at 40$ per piece, general purpose software for mass consumer market.

      We did prepare a custom Win ISO, cut down to bare minimum, hardened and tweaked for mass deployment inside close network. Great thing. Costed A Lot of work from skilled admins. ISO is used in high security area.

      Also, for businesses we use Enterprise version, which configures itself based on policy.

      You want the custom, bare system. Do it yourself. The same applies to Linux and its distros. Off the shelf versions will always be general and mass market configured.

    17. Re: 0.01% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have this
      It's called buy an enterprise license and use sccm bitch!

    18. Re:0.01% by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Problem is that there is no real penalty for deleting people's data. At most we might see a class action one day, resulting in a $5 discount on Microsoft products for affected users, most of which will never be taken up.

      The EU has regulators for privacy issues who proactively look for problems and investigate. We need something similar for severe product flaws.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:0.01% by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Proactively looking for flaws in software is illegal, unfortunately.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    20. Re:0.01% by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      It didn't fail the install - it just hadn't been installed yet (and still isn't, even tho I leave my PC on and connected 24/7.) Not all installs are handed the update at the same time, ignoring for the moment that many installed PCs are not on or connected to the internet all the time (or even at all for some people.) So out of the 7 million installs of Windows 10, only a small minority had received the update before Microsoft halted the roll-out.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    21. Re:0.01% by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      700,000,000 installations. 0.01% of that is 'only' 70,000 installs that lost data.

      Negative. The vast majority of those installations are NOT on the Targetted Branch, and only a subset of the Targetted Branch had Windows Updates rolled out. There's no way 70,000 people lost data to this, though that does not excuse the bug in the slightest.

    22. Re:0.01% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > (Your post features what I would call a rush to bad faith math.)

      Anything to portray MS in a bad light is considered a good thing on /.

    23. Re: 0.01% by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      How so? Some users reported this flaw in the early builds of the October update. MS apparently ignored those bug reports. Some say this is because MS has laid off its testing staff a few years back.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    24. Re:0.01% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SirSlud is correct. Machines are sorted into servicing rings, and the rings don't all get the update at the same time. If there is a problem with a specific configuration then those machines can be moved to a later ring.

      Example: 1803 had issues with specific AV so we moved all of the machines with that AV to a crazy late ring. That let the AV vendor drop a fix for it via their engine update process.

      That's why Telemetry matters. :/

    25. Re:0.01% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears the bug that caused file deletion was related to Windows 10 users who had enabled Known Folder Redirection to redirect folders like desktop, documents, pictures, and screenshots from the default location. Microsoft introduced code in its latest update to delete the empty and duplicate known folders, but it appears they weren't always empty. Microsoft has developed fixes to address a variety of problems related to these folder moves, and these fixes are now being tested with Windows Insiders.

      That's the part that shocks me. I know it's Microsoft and I know their programmers have always been a bit shit, but this is just some amateur shit right here. The kind of mistake an elementary school computer lab student might make.

      Seriously, what the fuck Microsoft? Then you guys don't even test the shit and just push it out to have your customers do unpaid work for you?

      Fuck Windows 10 and fuck Microsoft. Fuck them right up their spyware, adware, crippleware asses.

    26. Re:0.01% by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      Easy, it's called LTSB / LTSC ;)

  2. I have an idea by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now they should fix the problem where it can't rewrite the non-standard OEM BCD/boot loader partitions because there's not enough room because they were forced into the free upgrade from 7 and there's a 400MB different, minimum, and that doesn't work. Then it rolls back and tries it again because it's too stupid to have checked it in the first place or know why it's failing. Oh and I have another idea. Tell HP and Dell and Lenovo and literally every single OEM to STOP DOING CUSTOM BOOT LOADERS WITH LIKE 9 PARTITIONS!!!!!!

    1. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. I usually wipe all partitions and install Fedora.

    2. Re:I have an idea by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      And that makes the MS service pack-sized patches work better? Lol jk.

    3. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, yes it does...

    4. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do this--unsurprisingly--because it dramatically reduces their support costs. Also 85% or more of users simply will never check partition tables or care about the wasted space.

      And even those that do care, can use a repartitioning tool (like the free and excellent GParted) to reclaim back that space. I know on HP's Elitebook/Elitedesk line you can use Windows partition management to wipe the partitions without any issue or restart.

    5. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, why is that even necessary? The very first thing you should do (*after* activating Windows and Office and whatever) is blow everything away, grab the ISO from Microsoft and reload from scratch. Don't quote me on this but I think once you active an OEM device you no longer need the product code, it is in the BIOS and will self-activate. Viola, your very own "signature edition" install.

    6. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the dirty trick of M$ and those OEM who slept with M$ to make it almost IMPOSSIBLE to DUAL-BOOT with LINUX!
      First came UEFI, those Linux guru's were complaining that it was a foul move as it is blocking Linux enthusiasts into booting their favorite distro because of SecureBoot. Then Signatures where obtained quickly by top distros. But again, new underhanded Win10 update tricks were done to make it even more difficult.

      But believe me, karma will hit M$ and this will lead to their faster downfall because those Linux users who can't boot Win10 after installation of their Linux distro, will just forget Win10 for good without ever touching that crappy Win10 again. I mean, come on. It was M$ who gains when Win OS is preserved (via dual-boot) after a fresh Linux install, not the other way around. /rant

  3. now being tested with Windows Insiders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free labor... nice!

  4. Yes, until they hit another big bug and stop again by williamyf · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you have a process, follow the process.

    The process was supposed to be to hunt for bugs (the data munching bug was reported by insiders).

    Even if they missed those reports, as well as the intel audio bug,they would have had a second opportunity to catch it, because the process was to release to "Windows Insider Release Preview" ring before general availability.

    But they decided to NOT follow procedure and just skip that... ... and here we are.

    If you have a process follow it. If you feel the need to change the process, announce the change, change it, and then follow the changed process. Do not just arbitrarily d things in a diufferent way "just because"...

    Is ISO-9000 101 for dummies Satya...

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  5. task manager still flickers and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    segoe ui font still decimated and well it's STILL windows. waiting for year-of-the-linux-desktop. maybe moving to china will be the answer?

  6. What was really going on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See...what was happening was that they were using the 'move' command when sending your personal files to their servers instead of the 'copy' command which is what they really were trying to do. So they've fixed that and now we should be all better. Carry on.

  7. So ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A software company that can't detect if a folder is empty or not. And I want to trust it with my corporation's data?

  8. I don't care if it was 700 or 70,000 or 70,000,000 by Jahoda · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...Releasing a "service pack" which has any capability of wiping user files is fucking clown shoes. And, I am frankly fucking fed up with Microsoft forcing these monolithic updates twice a year. They haven't gotten one right yet.

  9. Not trusting it with a mile long pole by xack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't just release a fix to such a disastrous update with just three days testing. Microsoft needs to go back to the drawing board, formally revoke 1809 and focus on fixing bugs properly and release after a few months proper testing. This also affected the LTSC and Server versions of Windows, which are now officially not fit for purpose. Deletiongate means Microsoft will have a lot people and companies (especially mission critical ones) on Windows 7 well into the 2020s.

    1. Re:Not trusting it with a mile long pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you can fix such a bug as this in 3 days no problem. The bug explanation from Microsoft makes sense, so it's probably correct.

    2. Re:Not trusting it with a mile long pole by Xenx · · Score: 2

      First, to be clear, I'm not defending the initial problem or Microsoft.

      The problem was with deleting folders that they were assuming would be empty. The fix is, to either not delete the folders or not to delete them if there is content. I don't think that is something that requires a lot of time to implement.

    3. Re:Not trusting it with a mile long pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      knowing microsoft they probably move the files to where they 'should be' then delete the link. You might be able trigger a new bug if your hd is full :P

    4. Re:Not trusting it with a mile long pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      find -mount micrsoftpatch.script*.*|grep del |awk if variable=del insert # at cursor position 1

    5. Re:Not trusting it with a mile long pole by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You can't just release a fix to such a disastrous update with just three days testing.

      That is horseshit. If there was one specific problem with one specific sub part which is fixed with one easy change then there definitely is no reason to go back to a drawingboard.

      This also affected the LTSC and Server versions of Windows

      No it did not. Neither of these versions (LTSB) or the Server versions of Windows received or will receive this update.

    6. Re:Not trusting it with a mile long pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      knowing microsoft they probably move the files to where they 'should be' then delete the link. You might be able trigger a new bug if your hd is full :P

      That would be an "interesting" way to go about it in this case.

      Redirected known folders, in my experience anyway, are most always used to redirect to either a network UNC path location, or specifically to another volume, where move/link wouldn't be possible at all.

      Redirecting to a storage server sounds good in the sense you have a centralized location to backup and protect instead of a ton of individual systems, but move by relinking can't take place if it isn't on the same physical volume and so would fail.
      It would need to be a "copy and unlink/delete" action instead, and of course only unlinking after verifying the copy succeeded.

      I have seen people redirect folders to other local volumes/drives, though IMO I'm not sure of the benefits to this beyond doing it to work around other stupid Microsoft design decisions.
      Redirecting the entire users tree would probably be useful, but Windows doesn't allow that.
      Relocating an entire user profile/home folder might be useful but I'm pretty sure they don't allow that either outside of roaming profile setups. At least not prior to win10.

      So yea I can see something as stupid as that happening. Try to move by relinking, which would fail, and removing the old link (aka deleting) without checking the former worked first.

  10. Next, fix the install, AND THE INSTALL DIAG APP ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My install failed.
    But instead of telling me WHY it failed, it makes 45 Megabytes of logs.

    But it's okay, MS make an app to read those logs and do what the install should have done: TELL ME WHY IT FAILED.
    The diag app crashed.

    MS have lost it.

  11. Re:Yes, until they hit another big bug and stop ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's hilarious that you think Microsoft is concerned with Windows' 10 reliability. They fired their QA department for a reason. Users ARE the QA now.

  12. modifying user data with out explicit consent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is Microsoft modifying user data with out explicit consent? Anyone want to feed this one to the SJW crowd? Microsoft has committed data rape, why are there SJW's out there screaming about it?

    1. Re: modifying user data with out explicit consent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kill yourself.

    2. Re: modifying user data with out explicit consent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No lol.

    3. Re: modifying user data with out explicit consent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, please do.

    4. Re: modifying user data with out explicit consent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop trying to bully someone into killing themselves, you bully.

  13. Microsoft: Insufficient management, poor managers by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that Microsoft has insufficient management, and many poor managers.

  14. Yeah,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, Microsoft screwed up an update that affected people who used a Microsoft supported features rather than a third party hack or funky add-on.

    "We will carefully study the results, feedback, and diagnostic data from our Insiders before taking additional steps towards re-releasing more broadly,"

    Bollocks.

    How about you do thorough QA yourselves... oh... you fired most of the testers and then don't listen to insider feedback...

  15. I Cant Believe People Run Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a huge pile of crap. Slow, Buggy, Bad UI, Patches that ignore the user's control of the computer and delete user data. Then there is explorer - which still takes unbelievably long time to just simply display a list of files - this has long been an issue but it seems like all the developers at Microsoft have rocks in their head and cant make a simple, elegant, fast operating system. Instead they make bloated, intelligence avoiding garbage. I seriously wonder if the shareholders at Microsoft actually knew the idiocy going on. Mr "no more than 640k" bill gates needs a kick in the ass.

    1. Re: I Cant Believe People Run Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be worse, they could be running an "operating" system with pulse audio and system d

    2. Re: I Cant Believe People Run Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah the thing is - we already "make do" with their other offerings.. its basically what we do with all their products. So débrouille is a relevant descriptor!

    3. Re: I Cant Believe People Run Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that PulseAudio doesn't delete my music. Dumbass.

    4. Re:I Cant Believe People Run Windows 10 by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      For the record, Bill Gates was repeatedly infuriated by Windows as CEO. Updates requiring restart was a big one. I'm sure he has strong opinions on Windows 10, and not in a good way.

      The shareholders know what's going on. They only care about whether this makes someone jump ship. Which it won't.

    5. Re:I Cant Believe People Run Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Win10 fresh startup without any running apps = 1.6 GB usage of RAM
      Win7 fresh startup without any running apps = 900 MB usage of RAM
      WinXP fresh startup without any running apps = 120 MB usage of RAM

      Reason why I am still on XP. ; b

    6. Re:I Cant Believe People Run Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes RAM is cheap these days, but it's the attack surface that's dangerous with that 1.6 GB binary blob running at the background of Win10.

  16. Re:I don't care if it was 700 or 70,000 or 70,000, by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

    My favorite trick is recursively calling rd for all folders. Only the empty ones get deleted, because "directory not empty".

    They literally wrote the code to do it safely, but duplicated it elsewhere incorrectly.

    Microsoft, where reusing code is harder than one might think.

  17. Re:I don't care if it was 700 or 70,000 or 70,000, by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And people scold me because I have Auto-update turned off. Mistakes like what Microsoft did this past weekend are precisely why. I'll update when I know it's safe.

    - This bug also reminds me of the "Save with Replace" bug on my ancient Commodore 64 (and its 1541 floppy drive). It would overwrite the previous file with a new file, except the new file was sometimes unreadable garbage. It was even documented in the manual saying "Save your file first. Then erase the old one. Do not use the save-with-replace option as it generates corrupted files."

    That was back in the days when nobody had time to fix hardware errors, so they just shipped the computer as is. (And fixed the error in the user documentation.)

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  18. Of course they are not empty ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course the folders that were redirected are not empty. Windows scribbles shit all over the place no matter what you tell it to do, so the fault lies with the idiots not watching what Windows is doing and fixing the problems AS THEY OCCUR by moving the files to where they belong.

  19. Re:Yes, until they hit another big bug and stop ag by williamyf · · Score: 1

    Yes, of course I am aware that they fired most of the QA department.

    What I wanted to emphasize was that:

    If on top of firing most (if not all) of the QA department, they do not follow their own procedures and jump over their own defined user testing rings (internal own dog food ring, ultra fast insider user ring, normal insider user ring, slow insider user ring, general release, pro with defered updates, enterprise), then things like this are bound to keep happening....

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  20. Don't worry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is following right along with breakage and feature reduction in new versions, because fuck all, why should we support old code or features, we've got new new new to worry about!

  21. reported fix by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    if (oldUserFolderEmpty==true )
            deleteFolder()

    Seems they forgot the first line.

    What baffles me the most is that a user supposedly requested Microsoft to delete the old folder on install. Wonder if he got bit with the bug. I would love the irony.

  22. Uh, QA? by hlavac · · Score: 1

    One hundredth of a percent, with some 256 million PC's shipped in 2018, 50% of which probably come with windows 10 (128 million windows 10 PCs), that's probably some 12800 people who bought a new computer in 2018 that lost their files! And there's more win10 users from years before 2018...
    Is is really that evil done on large enough scale becomes just statistics?
    Fun fact: You are as likely to lose your files in windows 10 upgrade as to die in a skydiving accident!

    Microsoft, you know, QA, the thing you thought you don't need anymore? You still need it!

    1. Re:Uh, QA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft, you know, QA, the thing you thought you don't need anymore? You still need it!

      Need it? MS will close shop in a few more months and you still think they need QA? Let that company, with their crappy buggy products, die in peace.

  23. Re:I don't care if it was 700 or 70,000 or 70,000, by thegarbz · · Score: 0

    And people scold me because I have Auto-update turned off.

    And they should continue to scold you. There is a specific branch that you should have auto-update enabled for which has not experienced any of the issues that have been reported or been discussed in the media or here. That way you have stability as well as security.

    Mind you if you are on the Targetted Branch (as these cases were) then you also deserve a scolding since it's probably worse than disabling Windows Update altoghter. All said an done, there's only a subset of possible ways you will avoid a good scolding :-)

  24. Re:Microsoft: Insufficient management, poor manage by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

    More like too many managers, not enough management.

  25. When to update? by Xnet+Project · · Score: 1

    The best thing to do before committing to an new update is to either test on another Windows 10 machine "if available", or wait for reviews with how the new update works with other user upgrades/tests. This allows a user to review before commit.

  26. Re:I don't care if it was 700 or 70,000 or 70,000, by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

    Why so my computer could get fucked by MS latest update? Bullshit. (Also living in fear of malware is as ridiculous as living in fear some mass murdere will drop by & kill you. The probability of both tragedies are very low.)

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  27. They did it again. by cyx · · Score: 1

    Same thing still happens if you roll back to Win 7 from a "free" upgrade to Win 10.
    Store anything in that "Documents" folder, during your stay?
    Boom--it's gone.

    I mean, they do warn you that files "might" get blown away, but it's still bad
    practice to treat space you've explicitly set aside for the user in the same way
    you do system files.

    --
    EOP
  28. That, too. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    That sounds as though it could be correct.

    I'm reading the inappropriately named book, Marissa Mayer and the Fight to Save Yahoo!. (Half the book is about other poor management, before Marissa Mayer worked there.)

    As you said about Microsoft, many, many managers at Yahoo, not much clear thinking.

  29. Re:I don't care if it was 700 or 70,000 or 70,000, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're still using Windows?
    I got 99 problems but Windows ain't one.

  30. They knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft knew about this bug. It was reported 3 months ago during beta testing and got a bunch of "thumbs up" from testers.