Slashdot Mirror


Google To Launch Censored Search In China Despite Denials (thenextweb.com)

Google intends to launch a censored version of its Search app for China sometime in the next six to nine months, according to a leaked transcript from a private employee meeting held last month. The Intercept's Ryan Gallagher today reported the company's Search engine chief, Ben Gomes, held a meeting to congratulate a room full of employees working on the platform, dubbed Project Dragonfly. From a report: According to The Intercept, Gomes talked about the launch timeline: "While we are saying it's going to be six and nine months [to launch], the world is a very dynamic place." He goes on to point out that the current political climate makes it difficult to pinpoint a definite timeline, but indicates employees should be ready to launch whenever a "window opens." These comments come in stark contrast to public statements given recently by both Gomes and Google's chief privacy officer, Kieth Enright.

Speaking to members of Congress last month, Enright tried to skirt the issue of the Dragonfly project by playing dumb. According to Wired he didn't quite deny involvement, and in fact admitted the company had explored the idea, but simply stated Google wasn't "close to launching" the censored Search engine and that he was "not clear on the contours of what is in scope or out of scope for that project." Gomes took the soft-denial a step further when he told the BBC "Right now all we've done is some exploration, but since we don't have any plans to launch something there's nothing much I can say about it."

116 comments

  1. Question for Chinese by Tailhook · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone in China actually care about Google search? The topic is a hot potato in the US for a number of reasons, but the fact is that search isn't that hard and there are already search engines available in China. It isn't as if Chinese internet users are lost among the myriad domains for lack of Google search...

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    1. Re:Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Does anyone in China actually care about Google search? The topic is a hot potato in the US for a number of reasons, but the fact is that search isn't that hard and there are already search engines available in China. It isn't as if Chinese internet users are lost among the myriad domains for lack of Google search...

      Helwo, wound eye. The google want us to see the ads - that is all.

      -- Chicken Ball

    2. Re:Question for Chinese by arbiter1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Reason people care is it shows google has the coding needed to selectively censor speech they claimed they weren't doing. Well they lied about it and they could and probably already censor results you see to fit the views they want. Everyone has their panties in a bunch (all the left) about Russia's interference but reality is companies like Facebook and google have done far more then Russia could ever hope to image in interfering in US election's.

    3. Re:Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reason people care is it shows google has the coding needed to selectively censor speech they claimed they weren't doing. Well they lied about it and they could and probably already censor results you see to fit the views they want. Everyone has their panties in a bunch (all the left) about Russia's interference but reality is companies like Facebook and google have done far more then Russia could ever hope to image in interfering in US election's.

      When you are an American, swaying the votes of others via your Freedom of Speech is participating in the American election.

      When you are a Russian, swaying the votes of anybody by any means is interfering in the American election.

      You do understand the difference right?
      Or at least understand why allowing foreign nationals to influence/interfere in our elections might be a very bad idea?

    4. Re:Question for Chinese by youngone · · Score: 1

      You do understand the difference right?

      Reading between the lines of his post, he probably identifies as a conservative, so no he doesn't understand.

    5. Re: Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Censorship is not "participating". Right... Tell us another one!

      Of course they have the capability. They could do anything with their sw at any moment. Data brokers sell data to everyone.

    6. Re:Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone in China actually care about Google search?

      It will be a much better exercise if you ask yourself THE SAME QUESTION, as Google *is* practicing CENSORSHIP ON AMERICANS, as we speak

      Here is a leak document from Google - official document, with 'Good Censorship' as its title https://www.scribd.com/documen...

    7. Re:Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he doesn't understand.

      Neither do I, because it's bullshit. The voters are responsible for the choices they make, not the *Russians* or anybody else. Looks like from here on out, the losing side will always blame "interference" for their own failures. Trump was ready to do the same if he lost.

    8. Re:Question for Chinese by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      How can voters choose responsibly when they're they're inundated with misinfo, disinfo, and outright lies?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    9. Re:Question for Chinese by TokyoJimu · · Score: 1

      I don't think most Chinese will care. This would mostly be a boon for all the tourists and non-Chinese-speaking expats who cannot currently easily access Google search, Google Maps, Google Transit, etc. For this reason, I hope they do it.

    10. Re: Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honest question, is Sundar Pichai American?

    11. Re:Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the growth potential here is effectively zero, since the tourists are already users and if all the expats vanished tomorrow Google couldn't measure it.

    12. Re:Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can voters choose responsibly when they're they're inundated with misinfo, disinfo, and outright lies?

      The same way they've been choosing while inundated with misinfo, disinfo, and outright lies for hundreds of years in the US. Misinfo, disinfo, and outright lies aren't some new Russian innovation; the Russian's aren't even particularly good at it.

      Butthurt lefties crying "we was robbed" is another old phenomena.

    13. Re:Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you are a Russian, swaying the votes of anybody by any means is interfering in the American election.

      Whatever happened to that biding love of whataboutism when it came to anything a foreign country might try on the US? "But the US did the same thing to such and such." Somehow all that has vanished from the minds of angry liberals. Suddenly the US is sacrosanct and any interference by Russians, real or imagined, is a heinous crime.

      Russian controlled elections, SCOTUS full of rapists .... You're literally living in a world of imaginary boogeymen.

    14. Re:Question for Chinese by dwater · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I'd say the vast majority of Chinese people wouldn't care at all. I doubt many would know or care at all, tbh, since Google has lost in China, for Chinese people anyway...they're very happy with the services they get that cater directly to Chinese people.

      The only difference it might make is to 'westerners' who currently use Google services and can't while they are there, and that only depends on this appeasing the authorities there to not mess with Google's IP addresses or whatever it is that is done. That isn't a given. I suppose there is a slight chance it might serve as a 'toe in the door', but I doubt it...no one there has much of an interest at all.

      I seriously doubt people in the west understand just how irrelevant Google is there. It's like night and day compared to how it is in the US and/or UK. I think Google probably need to 'get over themselves' if they think their choice to deny the Chinese people their wonderful company and its services has made any difference at all. It's a fair enough choice if they think it isn't worth the effort, but even that is a questionable choice - better to have influenced from within, IMO.

      --
      Max.
    15. Re:Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But the US did the same thing to such and such." Somehow all that has vanished from the minds of angry liberals. Suddenly the US is sacrosanct and any interference by Russians, real or imagined, is a heinous crime.

      They do the same thing when it comes to American soldiers being killed, the hypocrites. To avoid being a hypocrite you should either be for soldiers raping children in foreign countries without consequence or for soldiers being massacred in equal numbers/proportions to whatever adversary even if it means we have to do it. So, which is it?

    16. Re: Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it funny... when Google made a Hindu CEO, for sure reason Google stopped hiring non-Hindu tech workers. Must be a coincidence, right?

      And once their workforce was majority non-American, Google started doing all sorts of evil un-American things. Must be another coincidence...

    17. Re:Question for Chinese by houghi · · Score: 1

      Try searching for "Lanny Barbie" a porn actress on google image search. A while back you would see her nipples. Google already censors in the US (and everywhere else).

      For thjose that say it is not done by a governement:
      Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information, on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient" as determined by a governmentor private institution.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    18. Re: Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 informative

    19. Re: Question for Chinese by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      India doesn't produce sociopaths any more than we do (and we don't produce morons any more than they... your efforts to convince us otherwise notwithstanding).

    20. Re:Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is so stupid.
      If your country wasn't organizing coups and making wars all around the world this argument could be used.
      American elections is a global issue. Influencing Americans to vote against war is one of the best things one could do, regardless of nationality. We are all involved in the issue. Why should only those selling the bombs have a voice and not those taking them?

    21. Re:Question for Chinese by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Reason people care is it shows google has the coding needed to selectively censor speech they claimed they weren't doing.

      Um, they have been quite proud of that capability and open about how they use it since the start.

      The search engine is the best because it filters out the crap. They filter out illegal images from image search. Gmail filters spam. YouTube filters everything randomly with an extremely broken copyright detection system.

      "Censoring" shit people don't want is their USP. Without that they would be Yahoo! or Alta Vista. Remember those?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:Question for Chinese by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's not about search, it's about Android. Android is huge in China, but they can't use any Google apps/services because they are all blocked. If Google just relents and provides a censored search engine then they can get their apps on to Chinese phones and partner with OEMs who are already shipping their customized versions of AOSP.

      It's disappointing, but Microsoft (Bing) and Apple have been doing it for years so I guess it's unprecedented.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re: Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If America believes in free speech for all, then that applies regardless of whether the speaker is an American or otherwise. To suggest otherwise is no better in principle than censoring the speech of Americans.

      Itâ(TM)s not rocket science. You either support free speech or you donâ(TM)t.

    24. Re: Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the government isnâ(TM)t making Google do it then I see no problem there. People can choose to not use Google if the results are not appropriate enough.

      Alternatively, Tim Berners-Lee has a solution called Solid which would allow one to mix and match data, taking Googleâ(TM)s choice away anyway!

    25. Re: Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Search is practicing censorship on themselves. Theyâ(TM)re not censoring what you say, as youâ(TM)re free to say as you please, theyâ(TM)re censoring the output of their own search system. You can still run a website with any content you like and Google wonâ(TM)t stop you.

      There is a key difference!

    26. Re:Question for Chinese by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      That market is long gone. Tencent effectively owns android in China with WeChat.

    27. Re: Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India produces a large number of surgeons. Surgeons are statistically more likely to be psychopaths than other doctors.

    28. Re:Question for Chinese by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      ...I don't know why I doubted you. Jeez, what a crock of shit. Bing gives ya what ya actually searched for...

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    29. Re: Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot. Globalization is pretty new. And the internet makes it a lot easier than before.

      Your post about we been dealing with it for 100s of years is a lie. And you know it.

    30. Re: Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially if youâ(TM)re looking for porn. Bing is king!

    31. Re: Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the type who responded to those nigerian prince emails, aren't you?

    32. Re:Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are already search engines available in China but they aren't doing a good job in indexing webpages outside China. The best search engine in China to search international webpage is probably Microsoft's Bing search which have content censorship applied, but everyone know Bing's performance cannot be compared to Google. And then, even when making Chinese searches, local search engines like Baidu are also sometimes problematic, like it allow companies selling fake medicines to advertise on their site and caused people die from them, so a cleaner experience is also preferred by some people.

      Also, another factor to consider is that, because existence of online tools like Google and Wikipedia that do not follow Chinese censorship rules yet carry many valuable information, the Chinese government is now turning a blind eye to people who use anti-censorship tools to access the internet. However, the situation is changing with more and more tools become blocked by Chinese government, arrest of people who sell those tools, as well as requirements for VPN service provider to register to the Chinese government and keep record of users usage history. If Google enter China at this point of time, then one of the major reason why Chinese government would turn a blind eye to these anti-censorship tools would have disappeared and might give them more confidence in trying to stop people from accessing banned sites.

    33. Re: Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, is it really something that exists as "Alternative to Google" with comparable quality when the search engine development have been so algorithm optimization and data collection intensive?

    34. Re:Question for Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the voters' fault for choosing to believe that misinfo, disinfo, and outright lies... It is their fault for their own failure to take the initiative to verify facts. So of course they will believe whatever conforms to their biases. It is the voters that created this mess, and only they can clean it up. The house won't clean itself.

  2. It's ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just an art project.

  3. Hey, Google by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is such a terrible idea that even Mike Pence is telling you not to do it. MIKE FUCKING PENCE thinks it's likely to undermine human rights.

    Maybe rethink?

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Hey, Google by Shikaku · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's only 1 thing on their mind, even though they have plenty of it anyway: more $$$

    2. Re:Hey, Google by El+Cubano · · Score: 1

      Maybe rethink?

      Unless, of course, their thinking is that this will help them support the "What?!?! Liberal bias?!?! Not us. Nope. Just look at how we are willing to jump into bed with the Chinese government."

    3. Re:Hey, Google by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      You say that like you think Mike Pence is the villain of the White House. He's not. He's a closeted little weirdo who calls his wife Mother but he's no Stephen Miller, AKA the guy who came up with putting babies in cages.

    4. Re:Hey, Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately China just granted itself superpowers to search or seize any piece of network equipment from any ISP, with no reason given. If Google decides to put a datacenter in China then they might have a problem with their private keys.

    5. Re:Hey, Google by youngone · · Score: 0

      He's a closeted little weirdo who calls his wife Mother

      Wow, that really is weird. I mean I assumed he's gay because he's so obsessed with dude-on-dude action, but calling his wife mother?
      That's just pervy.

    6. Re:Hey, Google by dryeo · · Score: 1

      They're a public company, it is expected they produce the maximum returns for their shareholders and shareholders are stupid enough to believe the maximum return is caused by expanding forever rather then having principles.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    7. Re:Hey, Google by fafalone · · Score: 1

      But then they'd be agreeing with Mike Pence. Between a rock and a hard place.

    8. Re:Hey, Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is such a terrible idea that even Mike Pence is telling you not to do it.

      "Do business with China following Chinese laws and rules! That's capitalism! Wait, you're going to be part and parcel of the suppression of information that fundamentally undermines the America government's ability to manipulate the country? Stop working with China!"

      Seriously, this is not some principled stand or well thought out idea. This is all just some stupidly naive idea of how corporatism can be exported to control China in the same way corporatism in the US controls its population through the US government. He obviously missed the memo on who pulls the strings and how expendable he is.

    9. Re: Hey, Google by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      You know there's a whole culture of people who call their wives "mother". As in "mother of our children". Like millions of people. Typically very very boring small town people. The kind of people who wouldn't know how to get pervy if they tried.

      Check your privilege and get out of your little bubble.

    10. Re:Hey, Google by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Be interesting to know how much Apple and Microsoft make out of the Chinese market. iPhones are quite popular, but I have no idea about Bing.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re: Hey, Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My father did that to my mother. Never realized LA was a boring small town.

    12. Re: Hey, Google by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Liberals who's only experience with kids is taking their underage girlfriends to Planned Parenthood aren't familiar with cultural norms of two parent families. So Pence does seem "weird" to them.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    13. Re:Hey, Google by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This is such a terrible idea that even Mike Pence is telling you not to do it. MIKE FUCKING PENCE thinks it's likely to undermine human rights.

      Hey, human! Listening to what Mike Pence says as if he believed it is a terrible fucking idea. Remember when he said that a President who besmirches the office should be removed from same office, something which he clearly never actually believed? Pence is a liar. Don't believe anything that comes out of his mouth.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re: Hey, Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Closeted weirdo? That calls his wife mother?

      You are kink shaming.

    15. Re: Hey, Google by youngone · · Score: 1

      Good lord, you've really drunk the kool-aid haven't you?
      Nearly all the weirdo talking points in one post. You forgot to blame Al Gore for something though.

    16. Re: Hey, Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, calling YOUR wife mother is creepy as fuck. I don't care where.

      Saying "the mother of my children" isn't the same.

      No wonder everyone thinks you repubtards are so fucking sick. You rape women, children, animals, and call your wives mother. So when you are fucking your wife you look at her like your mom?

      No wonder repubtards are sick weirdos who are closet fags. Someone has allowed them to continue this behavior as if it were normal.

      So, calling your wife "mother", and not "mother of my children" isn't normal. No matter what you say. It's a sick fetish.

      The picture is becoming very clear now. Now we know why you guys are against gay people. Because you are closet fags who despise your own inner feelings.

      The Republican Party folks. Filled with sickos and rapist. Vote for them
      Today.?!!

    17. Re: Hey, Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than having a bunch of repubtard kids running around screaming I wanna fuck my mom.

      Sick faggot.

  4. Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With Google, you lose your:
    browser privacy,
    location,
    personal and financial privacy,
    You gain:
    curiated advertisers
    curiated shopping results
    curiated news and now
    curiated search results

  5. It will be a failure by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    The Chinese know that their searches are censored and they got used to it. Google has no hope of being popular in that country unless it is not censored. It simply cannot differentiate itself from the myriads of established search engines there.

    My guess is that it won't be launched as Google, it'll be an engine behind another name to test the waters and to avoid humiliation that would certainly happen when we all find out that the name Google means nothing in China if it is still censored like all others.

    1. Re:It will be a failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest the name "Gulag". Very apt! It's the new improved Google for the Antifa century.

    2. Re:It will be a failure by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Goolag?

  6. Better to be a player than to not play at all... by Arzaboa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You would think that having a search engine created for China, by a United States company, would be something googlers would be behind. You can not affect change in a place where you have no market penetration. Boycotting the Chinese market of over a billion people, is really just turning your back on them.

    --
    If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?! - Pink Floyd

  7. Billions of people by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Spending billions online.
    What US ad company would not want to go full Communist?

    Just find US staff who are ready to totally remove terms like
    Emperor, Two term limit, 1984, Disagree, a bear cartoon.
    Personality cult, emperor’s dream, emperor’s reign, incapable ruler, yellow gown. Long live the emperor.
    Tiananmen Square. Operation Yellowbird https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Years of hard work at a top US university only to work all day at an ad company to please a Communist party and remove every bear cartoon.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Billions of people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, there is what 700 million online? And growing. There is less than 200 million online in the us and that number is stagnating. Can’t do much better in a population of 300 million. Pretty crazy when you think about it.

    2. Re:Billions of people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All those things you can see in China without even needing a vpn.

  8. Don't pay the chinaman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because Trump.

  9. How do I buy Duck Duck Go shares? by aberglas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Once Google starts up in China, it is only a matter of time before someone accuses Google of censoring US search results to please China. It will be very hard to defend against such claims, especially as China will want something in return for allowing Google in.

    Google will never become more than a niche player in China, they will simply not allow it.

    Bing is already there.

    I bet they are sipping Champagne at Duck Duck Go. Finally, a solid reason to exist.

    1. Re:How do I buy Duck Duck Go shares? by larryjoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Once Google starts up in China, it is only a matter of time before someone accuses Google of censoring US search results to please China. It will be very hard to defend against such claims, especially as China will want something in return for allowing Google in.

      Search results for Chinese roamers in the US are already censored. I doubt the Chinese care about the viewing habits of Americans. The Chinese only want two things from Google: block access to forbidden things for Chinese and rat out Chinese who are against the party.

      Google will never become more than a niche player in China, they will simply not allow it.

      Bing is already there.

      I bet they are sipping Champagne at Duck Duck Go. Finally, a solid reason to exist.

      Bing is nothing. Google is nothing. Baidu has a dominant share, and all non-Chinese search engines are bit players in China. The curious question is why the party is playing with Google at all. They will never allow Google to be a significant player in China, so why even talk to Google? Perhaps the appearance of subjugating a supposedly high-minded and powerful Western company? Perhaps the acquisition of technology that is de facto required of Western companies doing business in China?

    2. Re:How do I buy Duck Duck Go shares? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Google is already huge in China thanks to Android. Most Chinese phones run Android, just with the Google services removed.

      That's why they want in. Search is just so that Google Assistant and other services that rely on it work. And they have an opportunity - Tencent have the speech recognition tech but not the search capability to make it intelligent, Siri is even dumber than the western versions, and Baidu have basically nothing.

      I've used Baidu maps, it's no Google. The potential is huge, but they have to have a censored search engine to enable it all.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:How do I buy Duck Duck Go shares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. So that is why Meizu phones (very common) did not support Google services at all.

      But the Chinese can fork Android. And indeed almost do, with ColourOS, etc. Mainly to butcher it, probably to also add surveillance stuff.

      Google is already in trouble in the EU for insisting that Google runs on Android phones. I would be surprised if China permitted it if it was going to provide serious competition to local companies. And those local companies are getting much better at developing software.

  10. Re:Better to be a player than to not play at all.. by aberglas · · Score: 1

    Because it is much more likely that China will change Google than Google will change China.

  11. Obama would have done nothing by aberglas · · Score: 1

    Obama would analyze the situation from 100 different angles. Focus on forming a consensus. And have a dozen sophisticated reasons for saying nothing.

    Pence and Trump just say the first thing that enters their small minds.

    Sometimes, I prefer Pence and Trump.

    1. Re:Obama would have done nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The curse of higher intelligence is having the black and white certainties masked by all those shades of grey.

    2. Re:Obama would have done nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. Higher intelligence doesn't always make you a pussy.

  12. Google minus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this their new project, Google- ? Google minus freedom. Doodle that!

  13. Google Is A Clear and Present Danger To All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is no longer a maybe.

    Google thinks the goal is gaining access to China but the real goal is the Chinese are using Google to gain access to the rest of the world.

  14. Google = data mining = mass surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatâ(TM)s your point? Youâ(TM)re all too stupid to notice what data mining really is?

  15. The US would do the same by oxicage · · Score: 1

    China knows that Google works very closely with US Gov agencies. China is just protecting its interest from the US Gov. The US like to mouth that there is separation between corporations and US gov agencies but that it not the case, and every country knows this. If the situation is reversed, the US would do the exact same thing, and actually would go even further by denying it totally. So complaints about China doing this doesn't make any sense and in any case Google can just take their spy toys and go home.

  16. New Motto: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evil is us!

  17. Non-Denial by mentil · · Score: 1

    Translation: "Today we have no ultra-concrete plans, only very-firm plans. Once the scrutiny dies down, we will establish an exact plan."
    Read between the lines.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  18. Re:Better to be a player than to not play at all.. by mentil · · Score: 2

    Going into China increases their liability surface area. If they were really trying to undermine China's govt. they'd have done so years ago. This all about making money from Chinese internet users.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  19. Its a good thing. by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    It involves great trust on part of the government to allow access to thier citizens like this, ultimately it may help bring our societies closer, hopefully.

    --
    [($)]
  20. Training Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google's main interest (other than the obvious financial interest), if I had to guess, is as a huge potential source of training data for the AI they've been developing since the co. was founded. They probably figure they can train their AI 3-4 times faster with all the ppl in China helping out.

  21. market risks huge shareholders will punish them by johnjones · · Score: 1

    ok so you launch a search engine in china and due to regulation you must operate within china (your Data Centre can not be yours) and you must "partner" for payments

    so you think google is going to code a search engine from scratch or take some of the existing code over ?
    do you think that it wont be "audited" ?
    google IP (how its search engine works) is now going to be in the hands of "non google" I would say shareholders should be very worried

    they would have been better to partner with a advertising firm in china and simply offer to advertise globally to google customers...

  22. Hilarious by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    Folks freaking out about a censored search engine in China.

    While not OBVIOUSLY censored here in the US, the search results can be manipulated to drive folks to certain sites over others which can then be used to modify public opinion on any given topic.

    Google et al can do this without most even realizing it, whereas the mainstream media doesn't even try to be sneaky about it at all. You KNOW if you're watching a Fox affiliate it's going to be nothing but Republican love whereas any CNN broadcast is going to be all Democrat.

    Typically, if you know which way the CEO leans, then you know what bias to expect from any information source owned by them.
    ( Thus the danger posed by allowing the consolidation of media companies into the hands of so few people. )

    Example: Type in the word " Trump " in any search engine.

    If the first several pages return a majority of hits from sources that loathe the man, those folks reading said material may eventually develop a negative opinion towards Trump in general based on what they're exposed to day after day.

    The same holds true for sources that think he's the greatest thing since sliced bread. Subtly shift a majority of your hits from sources that absolutely adore him and you get the opposite effect. A population exposed to nothing but positive information will have a vastly different opinion from those who are fed nothing but negative data.

    Now, take that idea and realize that a search engine can subtly modify search results based on any criteria they want ( which is why they're all so interested in hoovering up as much data about you as they can ). Then you understand that the data you're looking at might not be as bias free as it should be since the results you're seeing may have been ' tweaked ' a bit in an effort to shape your opinion.

    Just a thought.

  23. The 'Good Censorship' document from Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Once Google starts up in China, it is only a matter of time before someone accuses Google of censoring US search results to please China

    Google doesn't need to go to China to practice CENSORSHIP ON AMERICANS

    https://www.scribd.com/documen...

    Above is a leaked document from Google, with the title of "Good Censorship'.

    It outlines what Google is ALREADY DOING, that is, Google is already playing their so-called 'Good Censorship' on all of us !!

    1. Re:The 'Good Censorship' document from Google by Raenex · · Score: 2

      Above is a leaked document from Google, with the title of "Good Censorship'.

      It outlines what Google is ALREADY DOING, that is, Google is already playing their so-called 'Good Censorship' on all of us !!

      So is Slashdot. When I submitted this story, it was gone from the stories you can vote on within an hour.

  24. Why is this an issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone, just calm the fuck down. As others have quite reasonably pointed out, Google et. al. can do this already if they choose (and they may already do, and we would not even know it).

    China is a sovereign nation and has it's own laws on internet use - whether you agree with them or not is not the point. Like any country, if you want to do business there, then you have to abide by their laws - it's that simple.

    The irony is that many countries opress free speech and restrict access to information, including the United States - at least China is honest and up-front about it, just not with their own people :/

    1. Re:Why is this an issue? by jcr · · Score: 1

      China is a colonial empire that viciously oppresses subject populations in Tibet, Xinjiang, and other places, not to mention practicing routine censorship, imprisonment, and even murder of Han Chinese dissenters. The argument you're advancing is the same one made about the Nazis, and the Soviet Union. Google is aiding and abetting tyranny, and we have every right to despise them for it. If you have an issue with that, I heartily invite you to go fuck yourself.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  25. Re:Better to be a player than to not play at all.. by Desler · · Score: 1

    Falsely assuming that the Chinese government is going to change for Google...

  26. Re:Better to be a player than to not play at all.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't boycott them, you circumvent their firewall, and provide access that nobody can take down.

  27. Don't worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They plan to use it in the USA too.

  28. Re:Better to be a player than to not play at all.. by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    And then get banned from doing any business in that country.
    Hint - (They want to make lots of money in China.)

  29. vote with their income by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    switch all you services else where today and hurt googles income. It the only thing that they care about.

  30. How dare they support government censorship by AC-x · · Score: 1
  31. Re:Better to be a player than to not play at all.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, problem is the Americans can't realize that they are the second most powerful country now, and that they have been for decades.

  32. Who would have thought?! by ckatko · · Score: 1

    The same people who think it's okay to censor the opinions of US citizens... thinks it's okay to censor the opinions of Chinese dissenters. ...SURPRISED?

    That awkward moment when your ideology is literally the same one they use in China to crush journalists.

  33. Ben Gomes just had his last job. #googlenohire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ben Gomes should come to know that he has just committed career suicide. If this man loves dictatorship and a lack of civil rights then he should be made to go groveling to his Chinese overlords for his next job after Google.

    Google is now a mark of shame on any resume.

  34. Why Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Perhaps because they want to have influence over Google, by being able to throw them out.

    Xi has ambitions beyond China.

    Not sure what you mean by "Chinese roamers".

    1. Re:Why Google by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you mean by "Chinese roamers".

      Chinese folks with Chinese SIM cards that roam outside of China.

  35. Re:Better to be a player than to not play at all.. by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 1

    And then get banned from doing any business in that country.
    Hint - (They want to make lots of money in China.)

    Once a foreign company has gotten permission to operate in China and has invested there, the ruling Communist Party can use that as leverage to influence that company's operations everywhere.

    Nudge, wink, or else.

    As the Communist Party feels increasingly powerful and finds these methods are working (as they have been) they will only become more brazen.

    --

    Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

  36. Google is censoring search results EVERYWHERE! by KiviPall · · Score: 0

    Why are you guys constantly whining about China? Google, Facebook, Twitter, Reddit and so on are all censoring search results/posts all around the world!
    If you are not parroting what ever crap allowed by "Central Committee of Truth" your are probably censored or you never show up on the front page.
    China is irrelevant!

  37. Making hay while the sun shines by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    You can see why Google is doing this now. Now that the US has its own authoritarian regime that doesn't care too much for human rights, it's easier to collaborate with China's government than ever before, and it likely won't be this easy ever again.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Making hay while the sun shines by Luckyo · · Score: 0

      Fun part being that this "authoritarian regime" is repatriating powers to regional actors, and "not caring about human rights" while doing a whole lot less assassinating of its citizenry people abroad. All while being in open opposition to China, making any co-operation potentially trigger sanctions.

      Do you even realise you're spouting Ministry of Truth level material here?

    2. Re:Making hay while the sun shines by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      He doesn't realize that the "authoritarian" government he hates (at the moment) is exactly the same as the one he loved just a couple years ago. He is a fan of authoritarian governments, as long as it is his guy, and not the other guy that will be gone in 2 or 6 years from now.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Making hay while the sun shines by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      Bbbbbut Zaphod!

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
  38. Feature flag censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're already censoring in the USA and the west. This is just a different set of feature flags for China. DDG "the Good censor".

    DDG working fine for me!

  39. An unpopular idea deserve consideration by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

    Google already has a variety of censorship controls, and we can all agree that its a good thing.

    Google suppresses sites known to host malware, child pornography, and probably lots of other stuff. This is good in my opinion.

    The question is where do you draw the line? As an American, I don't feel I have the right to tell the Chinese, where they should draw their line. I would offer advice if asked, but nobody is asking me and its not any of my business.

    If Google wants to expand its operations abroad, it has to obey the laws where they operate. If that bothers you, don't by Google stock and use DuckDuckGo.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
  40. They already have censored search here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...so why would they NOT roll it out in China? Am I rite?

  41. Google by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Still likes cash, despite denials. News at ten!

  42. Re:Better to be a player than to not play at all.. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    Last time they did it to google, they left China. I would suspect that both parties learned something from that experience.

  43. Bad sign for investors by melted · · Score: 1

    This "we'll do it no matter what" attitude probably means they know the ads business is running on fumes and won't grow anymore in the future. A significant fraction of their market cap is dependent on continued growth, and cloud is not growing anywhere near quickly enough, so like a heroin junkie they need another hit of ad revenue even if they have to proverbially fellate the Chinese communist party officials the in a dirty bathroom stall. It's not really about search. It's about search ads.

  44. Well, that's pretty evil. by jcr · · Score: 1

    I guess we'll see whether their employees stick around or leave en masse.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Well, that's pretty evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silicon valley employees have no morals or soul. They just want the green.

  45. Google has become a domestic enemy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 2 days you managed to post two different Google news that are showing that Google needs to be destroyed as a company.
    1- Google refused to work/bid on online storage for the Federal Government
    2- Today, Google IS happily working for the Chinese Communist Party to put together a "censored" search engine.
    Google is working AGAINST the USA (my new country) just to make more money & also working FOR the enemies of the USA because it LIKES & promotes totalitarian & tyrannical ideas.
    Also Alphabet/Google has spent so far 80 Billions dollars to make sure NO ONE can create a viable replacement for Google search engine & information gathering.
    Anybody else sees what's wrong with this?
    As a domestic enemy, the company should be dissolved, taken over by the a Federal entity, employees fired, corporate heads jailed & their assets confiscated. that would teach a lesson to all other GAFAs. Extreme? No it's being done in many other countries worldwide.

  46. Chinese roamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They must be very wealthy Chinese to be able to afford US roaming costs. When I go to the US I purchase a throw away SIM.

    Where did you get the idea that they were censored anyway. Maybe by using Chinese phones, but not the SIM card. The Smart and the Phone are quite distinct remember. All the SIM sees is encoded packets.

    1. Re:Chinese roamers by larryjoe · · Score: 1

      Where did you get the idea that they were censored anyway. Maybe by using Chinese phones, but not the SIM card. The Smart and the Phone are quite distinct remember. All the SIM sees is encoded packets.

      Because SIM cards act as credentials, they allow access to networks. That's why US SIM cards bypass the firewall in China and why Chinese SIM cards outside of China still censor access. The actual phone don't control access, the SIM cards do.