Slashdot Mirror


Boston Dynamics' Robot Went From a Drunk Baby To a Nimble Ninja in a Matter of Years (qz.com)

In a new video from robotics company Boston Dynamics, which Alphabet sold to SoftBank last year, a robot is shown hopping over a log and then up a series of blocks, an activity called parkour. From a report: In previous videos, the robot did a backflip -- now it's leaping over obstacles and climbing up large, uneven stairs with fleet-footed ease. But Atlas wasn't always so graceful. In some of the first videos where Boston Dynamics' robots could walk upright, way back in 2015, Atlas lumbered through the woods, looking like it was narrowly avoiding falling with each step, rather than moving with any kind of purpose.

115 comments

  1. Nice! by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    I did that as well as a kid.

    1. Re:Nice! by kiviQr · · Score: 1

      He is a kid, wait till he grows up!

  2. Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you watch the video it hops over a log, then jumps up a few fairly tall boxes.

    While this is technically impressive, it's a long way from Ninja or parkour. It didn't jump ON the log and balance - just over. Nor did it do anything complex like jump against the side of one of the boxes and land flat, maybe after rolling... you didn't even see it jump down from the highest box and do a roll landing on the floor. So basically, not at all what anyone would call parkour...

    I wish people would stop over-dramatizing what are real technical feats but end up looking lame after the buildup.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by forkfail · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wish people would stop building things that are going to wind up being used to control or kill us all.

      --
      Check your premises.
    2. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by e432776 · · Score: 2

      Strictly speaking, I agree with you. The headline is inaccurate.

      However, I have been following Atlas' development over the last couple of years and the improvement is pretty amazing. In that sense, I am not disappointed by the new video.

      The question is: with this rate of improvement, how many years until the headline would be accurate? I would guess no more than 3-5...

    3. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Luthair · · Score: 1

      The old video also seems quite a bit more impressive where it walks over rough terrain stabilizing itself, oth we don't know from this video whether that is the only log the robot can jump over and the only stairs it can mount.

    4. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      I wish people would start designing things to defend against such robots. Open-source plans for an man-portable EMP cannon would be nice...

    5. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish people would stop building things that are going to wind up being used to control or kill us all.

      Depressingly unlikely. At first, they will be heralded as important for dirty jobs no human wants to do: rescue operations in hazardous conditions like natural disasters or nuclear malfunctions.

      Once the battery/power problem is solved, these machines will be misused... it's a facet of human nature.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    6. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by AlanObject · · Score: 2

      I wish people would stop over-dramatizing what are real technical feats but end up looking lame after the buildup.

      Point taken but I am still impressed.

      What I expect is going to be this product line's first killer app is in the movie industry. People like over-dramatization and that is what they do. The real specs won't matter as much as what they can show with rehearsed scenes.

      But given the rate of improvement all we will really need is about 5 more years and the advent of a 160-year power supply (with backup of course) to have a real T800.

    7. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind sticking a saddle on one of those. With the rate AI is improving, it could be an excellent way to reach mountainous areas where normal wheeled vehicles could not even attempt to go. For example, a Mount Everest base camp. It can take people up, then go back down and fetch more supplies (oxygen tanks, etc.)

    8. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      While this is technically impressive, it's a long way from Ninja or parkour. It didn't jump ON the log and balance - just over. Nor did it do anything complex like jump against the side of one of the boxes and land flat, maybe after rolling... you didn't even see it jump down from the highest box and do a roll landing on the floor. So basically, not at all what anyone would call parkour...

      It also didn't flip out and kill people, so there's that.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re: Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait till it can chase people.

      "Are you John Connor?"

    10. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Narcocide · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's definitely coming for that lab assistant who kept knocking it over with the ball first.

    11. Re: Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still hits people in that fear spot. Rightly so. One of these with a 'autopilot' set to smash into humans mode (binary flag) would make a killer weapon

    12. Re: Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And take your corpse off the mountain when your out-of-shape ass dies.

    13. Re: Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You say that in jest but a fleet or robots that could collect corpses are Everest would actually be pretty useful since there are quite a lot up there that no-one can get down. Or heck even just trash collector robots for Everest would be useful.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    14. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish we'd just get the human killing robots built so I can stop listening to this whining argument.

    15. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by ClarkMills · · Score: 1

      Well they might just be feeding us and tending us as we age/decline too... Like most tech, it depends on how it's implemented.

    16. Re: Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that mode will be dormant in firmware, just for shits and giggles

    17. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Boston Dynamics is failing and looking for a buyout. Thus these videos. They don't show the robot dying in 5 minutes because it is out of power.

    18. Re: Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, trash collects you!

    19. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, well, for the greater good, humans need to be controlled.

      Especially politicians. Those are the humans that do the most harm, by far, and need to be brought under control.

      After that we have various other kinds of leaders, including corporate potentates and heads of government agencies; their combined efforts keep life horrible for most of the world, so they absolutely need to be brought under control.

      The serfs generally behave so long as they have food, clothing, shelter, and entertainment, so far fewer resources need to be spent controlling them.

    20. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I wish people would stop building things that are going to wind up being used to control or kill us all.

      I wonder who is funding these guys?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    21. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      It also didn't flip out and kill people, so there's that.

      Talking about flipping out look at the back flips this thing can do. Can anyone here do that?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    22. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, just to make you aware, this is all part of a field of engineering called control system engineering. The math is complex on the level of this robot butit involves mathematically modeling the robot. It's masses for all parts, along with any motor dynamics and springs/shocks.

      What is interesting about this is that it is going to get better at an exponential rate. It's one of those things where every year you'll see 2x progress then one year you'll see progress at like 10x or 100x. That's where this gets crazy.

      This is way more complicated that having pre-programmed routines. This is taking people that a re a mix of control systems engineers and computer science guys and getting them together to do this. Along with some structural engineers obivously. But I'll be frank. The people doing the mathematics for the control systems portion of this are at the top of their field and are probably making well over $200K each. I wouldn't be shocked to be told that they make $500K a year.

    23. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The reason they are doing this is because one off designs for robots are expensive. The first company to make a mutli-functional robot for 90% of tasks is going to make a shit ton of money. It's really the next Google or Microsoft or whatever.

      These robots will do more than replace people at mcDonalds. They will be replacing every robot welder/painter/whatever you can imagine seeing o0n an assembly line these days because of the reduced cost per unit when mass production is taken into account.

    24. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by rmdingler · · Score: 2

      Sadly, caring for our elderly might fall right in category as one of those

      jobs no human wants to do.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    25. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Dynamic movement like one foot jumping requires careful use of lots of force so that you land on the other foot without any extra inertia to tip you over. Jumping above your waistline requires quite a bit of nearly instantaneous power, there's a lot going on here, and a lot of risk of damage if you don't stick the landing exactly right the first time. Versus walking, which if you don't stick the landing, you can stumble in one direction for a couple of steps to recover.
       
      That said, natural terrain has it's own challenges, but I would not discount the ninja jumping. Sure, a 10 year old can do ninja jumps too, but that kind of motor skill control doesn't develop until sometime between 4 and 9 years, which, and I have built a quadruped and tried to make it walk (and failed), is damn hard to do already, that kind of dynamic motion control is impressive.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    26. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by mentil · · Score: 1

      Softbank i.e. China's military. I'm sure they'll abide by killbot regulations/ethical codes though, right?

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    27. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by BoogieChile · · Score: 2

      Woah nelly, no!

      We've all seen how that one ends already!

    28. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    29. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Define "caring"

      Humans can do the caring... and the robots can do the ass wiping and bed sheet changing.

      We'll all be better off - including the elderly.

    30. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by mentil · · Score: 1

      Don't thank me just yet. Another comment tipped me off that Softbank is Japanese, not Chinese. Mea culpa.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    31. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feeding "on" us...

    32. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      This is a greater danger than killer robots. Care robots are a great idea in theory but in the hands of corporations will be abused. Every kind of addictive behaviour, any way to extra extra cash will be exploited if left unchecked.

      Before elderly care bots it will probably happen with sexbots.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    33. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is:

      Did they program it to jump over the log and then up the boxes using distance and height? E.g. Run 10 steps, jump 50cm up, 40cm forward, run another 10 steps, jump 40 cm etc OR could they have put any random object in it's path and it would have automatically identified it and taken the right action to jump it??

    34. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I want to know is:

      Did they program it to jump over the log and then up the boxes using distance and height? E.g. Run 10 steps, jump 50cm up, 40cm forward, run another 10 steps, jump 40 cm etc OR could they have put any random object in it's path and it would have automatically identified it and taken the right action to jump it??

      More importantly, what this video from the third or from the tenth try?

    35. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by PingSpike · · Score: 1

      With enough practice I couple *probably* duplicate the final jump where the robot face plants into the jumping platform.

    36. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Yeah like those garbage trucks with the robotic arms that can pick up the trash barrel and dump it into the hopper. Now there are two guys on the trucks instead of three.

    37. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by BlackOverflow · · Score: 1

      How can you guarantee that? If you put armor and weapons on them, what can we do to stop them?

    38. Re: Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... more Pub Crawl than Parkour.

    39. Re:Come on - that is not Ninja (or parkour) by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Are you thinking Japanese robot army?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  3. How to get away... by magarity · · Score: 2

    So, it used to be that you could run away from the thing given uneven enough terrain but now I guess hiding is your only chance, at least until it runs out of power. Or does the hunter-killer model come standard with deep IR vision?

    1. Re:How to get away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they could -- I don't know -- use sound? No need to get all Hollywood here.

    2. Re:How to get away... by magarity · · Score: 1

      It's a lot easier to be quiet than to stop being warm.

    3. Re:How to get away... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Humans evolved for endurance, if we can outrun or outsmart it at all we can get away long enough for the battery to run out.

    4. Re:How to get away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe just run up a flight of stairs? ELEVATE!!!

    5. Re:How to get away... by DanDD · · Score: 1

      Passive IR is blocked by glass: https://youtu.be/Fx49t4sv7f0

      So running away and hiding behind glass might be feasible.

      Anyone/thing stupid enough to use active IR (an illuminator) in a contested environment deserves to...

      --
      "Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race." - H. G. Wells
    6. Re:How to get away... by mentil · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you do nothing at all for long enough you're guaranteed to stop being warm. Being quiet takes the same amount of time, if you count the sound of breathing and heartbeat.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    7. Re:How to get away... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      but now I guess hiding is your only chance

      Not as long as the ammo holds out. These things are incredibly fragile. A fully-armored version that could withstand the sort of ammo that people use to, say, hunt elk - would be very heavy.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  4. These sound like good ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

    Drunk Baby ... Nimble Ninja

    ... future Ubuntu version names.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:These sound like good ... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Needs to start with the same letter. So either Blitzed Baby or Drunken... ehh.. Daughter? Dumpling? Darling? *shrugs*

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re: These sound like good ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tumbling Toddler

    3. Re:These sound like good ... by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Needs to start with the same letter. So either Blitzed Baby or Drunken... ehh.. Daughter? Dumpling? Darling? *shrugs*

      Dickhead. Drunken Dickhead!

      Something we've all had the misfortune of seeing.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    4. Re:These sound like good ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Darling? *shrugs*

      Darling in the Shruxx?

  5. So, not having followed this ... have lots of independent people actually seen this, or are there just videos?

    1. Re: huh by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Instead of answering, a down mod? I was genuinely curious.

  6. Just wait until it is chasing you down dark alleys by alternative_right · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The future of American policing will be robots that follow suspects until they can be identified.

    In the future, you will face robots moving at 30 mph through pedestrian traffic to tail you on foot.

    They will listen in to all conversation for politically incorrect thought.

    They may even sniff out illicit substances and chase down the users.

    Is this "freedom"? We'd better get our act together before then.

  7. Re:Just wait until it is chasing you down dark all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope they are waterproof. Otherwise they'd be no match for a water gun.

  8. Fantastic! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    I for one would like to welcome our new robot ninja overlords. (If you were smart then you would too.)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  9. Re:Just wait until it is chasing you down dark all by Calydor · · Score: 2

    And they'll be authorized for deadly force if they see you holding a gun.

    Don't worry, they'll totally stand down if you drop the gun.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  10. Re:Just wait until it is chasing you down dark all by forkfail · · Score: 2

    Two things mankind seems to be good at:

    Dreaming up dystonian futures, and making them happen.

    --
    Check your premises.
  11. Re: Just wait until it is chasing you down dark al by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would love to see those follow politicians around. Give them a good smack upside the head when they lie or break the law.

  12. Exactly by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    It also didn't flip out and kill people, so there's that.

    See? Not Ninja.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ninjas likely spent most of their time working as gardeners , staying out of the way and definitely NOT killing people

      This allowed them to blend and be available when somebody really needed to die

      Besides, they existed in a 'death culture' where honorable people frequently offed themselves

    2. Re:Exactly by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      That's what I meant!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Exactly by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Ninjas likely spent most of their time working as gardeners , staying out of the way and definitely NOT killing people

      Ok, show me the clip where the robots are gardening, Can't garden? Not Ninja.

      This allowed them to blend

      I have to say I am really looking forward to the inevitable Boston Dynamics crossover episode of "Will it Blend"?

      Besides, they existed in a 'death culture' where honorable people frequently offed themselves

      The only reason people back then offed themselves so readily is because they knew a far more horribly Ninja related death was close at hand.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My point being that Ninjas, at least in a historical sense, were not known for 'flipping out and killing people'

      Their game was stealth

  13. Re:Just wait until it is chasing you down dark all by bonedonut · · Score: 2

    well, creation starts with imagination. its just too bad that this is the legacy we will leave behind. but know that in 10,000 years, robots will be killing each other over who they believe created them.

  14. Where are the ninja clips? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I checked out the links but I did not see anything resembling a ninja. Can't wait to see the Ninja clips!

  15. Wait, wait, wait... by pi_rules · · Score: 1

    They know not to give this thing a machine gun, right?

    1. Re:Wait, wait, wait... by mentil · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't work unless they were first given an imaging system that resembles a red eye sweeping back and forth.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  16. Re:Just wait until it is chasing you down dark all by epine · · Score: 3

    Don't worry, they'll totally stand down if you drop the gun.

    That's purely a design decision.

    If you're not pointing the gun at something living, the robot doesn't have much game theoretic motivation to mow you down, just for the sake of it.

    The robot's overlord, however, might have his/her own agenda ... But airlines don't kill us for no reason, so I wouldn't jump to conclusions too quickly.

    Machine vision for narrow tasks (such as gun identification) is likely to become far more reliable than human vision. And there's almost guaranteed to be visual footage after the fact (shooting with no visual record is surely a Volkswagon-class regulatory violation).

    Quite possibly, you'll have fewer montages of the families of dead police officers who fell in the line of duty placing wreaths on a fresh grave. This could hurt the gun lobby, to be honest.

    (Unintended effects cut both ways.)

  17. For good, not evil by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

    I can only hope that Boston Dynamics will use this for good, not evil. Don't build military or police robots. Do the right thing: build sex robots. Considering they are owned by the Japanese company Softbank, I can only assume this is now the intended use case for this technology.

    1. Re:For good, not evil by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      you'll know the 20 year game-plan if you see the next iteration armed with tentacles.

    2. Re:For good, not evil by mentil · · Score: 1

      Why would sexbots need to do backflips or jump over logs and up boxes?

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    3. Re:For good, not evil by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      No we're good. Look at Boston Dynamics company policy statement. It says it right there: "Don't be evil".

    4. Re:For good, not evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It’s so much better if we let pussy faggots like you hold back are military so our enemies can gain an advantage.

    5. Re:For good, not evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Clearly you are not having the right kind of sex.

  18. AAARRRRRRRR!!!! BOOOM!!! by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

    Now just strap a bomb to it, and you'll have Serious Sam IRL...

  19. Re:Just wait until it is chasing you down dark all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And they'll be authorized for deadly force if they see you holding a gun.

    And if it turns out to not be a gun, the robot will turn off its recording device and plant an unloaded gun and ammo on the suspect.

  20. Re:Alt-reichtards need brutally murdered by societ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go away Ivan

  21. What a world we live in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where I'm relieved that Alphabet does not have control of this technology

  22. Re:Just wait until it is chasing you down dark all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as pirate themed robots do their killing in the name of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, I'm good with it.

  23. Strobe by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Elon says their goal is to be fast enough so that a human can only see their motion clearly with the use of a flash strobe. It's very likely that he knows the right people to be able to say this with some certainty, but the trajectory is rapidly in that direction regardless.

    Now, then, arm them with blades, guns, and autonomous AI.

    When protesters get a little too forceful, just send out the 'ninjas'. Congress doesn't really have to worry about what laws it passes any more.

    https://www.stopkillerrobots.o...

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Strobe by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      https://www.stopkillerrobots.o...

      Australia, Israel, Russia, South Korea, and the United States all oppose a treaty to stop killer robots and keep them under human control. Insanity.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    2. Re:Strobe by mentil · · Score: 1

      Japan won't even rule out building nuclear weapons if they feel the need; trying to convince a military not to develop a certain weapon is bound to fail if that weapon is considered to give themselves an advantage. When one weighs rules, ethics, and survival, the latter ALWAYS wins (on the average). We'd need to end war on the political/economic side before the world powers would seriously consider giving up on killbots. How far away do you think 'solving politics and economics' is? Further away than killbots, in my estimation.

      OTOH if people were really worried about killbots, then where's the sabotage and the threats against researchers?

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    3. Re:Strobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elon talks a lot of shit, what is is new?

    4. Re:Strobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elon is full of unworkable ideas. He's a much better salesman than scientist.

    5. Re:Strobe by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I don't think people know what is going on. I don't think that they understand the rate of improvement and that when they think of "robots" they think of Daleks that can't climb stairs or something clunky. I think they think reality is not as close to science fiction as it really is.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    6. Re:Strobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My goodness. Isreal wants the right to have robots that kill people. I wonder WHO they might be thinking of? Certainly not those non-Jews living in their own homes that Jews want to live in instead, oh no.

    7. Re:Strobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next war will be over in seconds.

      If the Us loses:

      One second there will be 350 million people in the US.

      The next.. all the males will be dead and probably most of the women less than a 7 - killed by miniscule drones. Leaving the infrastructure.

      So you'd better oppose the killer robot ban. The only thing standing between you and insta-death will be our own defense killer robots.

  24. Re:Just wait until it is chasing you down dark all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our benevolent robot overlords

  25. Re:Just wait until it is chasing you down dark all by bonedonut · · Score: 1

    i take it you haven't seen Robocop?

  26. Parkour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Parkour"? Really? That looked like walking up stairs to me. Stairs with a gap in the middle, but still stairs. If you think that's parkour, you should probably do a few sit-ups each night.

  27. Oh dear. by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    Someone who still believes in the old 'engineer the complex systems control software', you know, the method that tried and failed to delivery high quality handwriting recognotion, voice recognition and synthesis, vision systems, etc, etc.

    While machine learning is way over hyped in what it CAN do, this is a perfect an example of where it fits perfectly in to place.
    ie: no 'engineer' is trying to solve these complex equations (or even characterise them) any more, they are brute force tuned with machine learning.

    What that basically means is a loop whereby the record the control and response data for a run, feed it back through a brute force error minimization
    algorithm tuning a few thousand (or tens of..) tuning parameters, run it all again, rinse, repeat.

    The people making $$$$ are out the door pretty much once the structure of the learning loop is good enough, then its all just cloud processing time.

    1. Re:Oh dear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      citation or opinion?

  28. Toilet Training by techdolphin · · Score: 1

    How long do I have to wait before it is toilet trained?

  29. Re: Just wait until it is chasing you down dark al by bonedonut · · Score: 1

    but they won't. they will be bodyguards for the rich.

  30. What do you do at worldend? Are you busy? Save us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The obvious answer is to counter evil robots (metal / inorganic thingies) with biological systems, preferably "next generation humans" whatever that means. There is no reason for living organisms to be inferior to machines! Tree roots break up rebar concrete structures, pry apart wrought iron fences, it just takes a long time. Biological processes indeed need to be accelereted by several magnitudes to match or excel the speed of machines. That's the task life sciences should face.

    To defend us against the model year 2035 Atlas Exterminator Titanium Edition we need "fairy soldiers" who are lab synthesized, kind of ripen on trees, fully grown by 15 year old and as fast as their lightsabers. Of course they won't last beyond 25 y.o. with such an accelerated metabolism, even if they survive all battles. That's a pretty tragic dilemma and there are so many japanese "light novel" franchises dealing with the resulting issues. Maybe those stories will become reality one day as the last hope of humankind. Beyond any hope, I do expect to meet Kutori one day.

  31. Boston Robotics in Japan (Re:RideD the invasion) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Year 2050: young engineer Derrida Yvain became famous for his contributions to development of the "Autonomous Machine DZ" at Rebuild, a company founded by his father. Derrida and his senior colleague Nathan discover a serious flaw in DZs and warn their boss of the danger, but are ignored. Next day, the duo are suddenly attacked by state security. Nathan is killed in a car chase while Derrida hides in a cold sleep machine. Ten years later he is woken up to a devastated world mired in war against out of control DZs. Despite the harsh fate that has fallen upon him, Derrida sets off to find and protect Nathan's then infant daughter Mage who supposedly holds the secret to disable DZs.

    https://myanimelist.net/anime/35835/RErideD__Tokigoe_no_Derrida/

  32. Re:Just wait until it is chasing you down dark all by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    The quality of the vision system isn't all that important, what matters is that the robot is expendable. Cops shoot when they are worried about getting shot themselves. The robot can just wait, possibly even until it gets shot first, because in the end it's just a machine that can be fixed/replaced. It just needs to survive long enough to call for backup.

    You have to wonder why police aren't doing this already. Rather than sending the SWAT team in, stay well back and send a drone in. See if the suspect really has a gun, give them an opportunity to surrender. Even a simple wheeled vehicle with a camera and mic/speaker would be enough if they are worried about the noise of a flying drone.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  33. The next stage... by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    The robot has mastered drunken baby. And now it has mastered nimble ninja. Before long it will reach the next level - Drunken Baby Nimble Ninja-style Martial Arts. I can't wait to watch the Drunken Master robots fight.

  34. Graceful by Headw1nd · · Score: 2

    I'm actually amazed at how graceful and light it looks as it moves. I imagine some of that is because its limbs and body are rigid and don't flex the way a human would, but just watching it looks light as a feather, not the 82 kg it actually weighs.

  35. Re:Just wait until it is chasing you down dark all by PingSpike · · Score: 1

    They already blew a guy up with a repurposed bomb defusing robot.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/te...

  36. Re:Just wait until it is chasing you down dark all by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Yeah... I was trying to avoid blowing anyone up, but okay it's a start I guess.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  37. Crossfit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool!
    Now I can have a robot that will do a crossfit for me ;)

  38. Re:Just wait until it is chasing you down dark all by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

    They will listen in to all conversation for politically incorrect thought.

    Won't need to, we already do it freely on the Internet via social media.

  39. Re:Just wait until it is chasing you down dark all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but it will be more like a dragonfly.

  40. This will be so great at killing people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So take the Boston dynamics robot's current level of mobility:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LikxFZZO2sk

      add deep learning computer vision using YOLO (you only look once):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPU2HistivI

    and give it a gun. That is already a pretty scary killer robot.