Slashdot Mirror


New Startup By a Trio of Doctors Uses Phone App To Collect Measures of People's Cognition and Emotional Health and Attempts To Detect Signs of Depression (technologyreview.com)

A startup founded in Palo Alto, California, by a trio of doctors, including the former director of the US National Institute of Mental Health, is trying to prove that our obsession with the technology in our pockets can help treat some of today's most intractable medical problems: depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and substance abuse. MIT Technology Review: Mindstrong Health is using a smartphone app to collect measures of people's cognition and emotional health as indicated by how they use their phones. Once a patient installs Mindstrong's app, it monitors things like the way the person types, taps, and scrolls while using other apps. This data is encrypted and analyzed remotely using machine learning, and the results are shared with the patient and the patient's medical provider.

The seemingly mundane minutiae of how you interact with your phone offers surprisingly important clues to your mental health, according to Mindstrong's research -- revealing, for example, a relapse of depression. With details gleaned from the app, Mindstrong says, a patient's doctor or other care manager gets an alert when something may be amiss and can then check in with the patient by sending a message through the app (patients, too, can use it to message their care provider).

50 comments

  1. Or is it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or is it that we are depressed because of the technology in our pocket?

    Whole generations now spend all their free moments staring vacuously at a 4 inch wide screen scrolling to the next Facebook post rather than engaging in fulfilling personal and interpersonal interactions which yield meaningful real world accomplishments.

    1. Re: Or is it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely

    2. Re: Or is it.... by Mkkby · · Score: 2

      Couldn't agree more. Hey doc, I'm depressed because I only have fake friends and an AI to talk to.

      Go out and play, like mom of 40 years ago told you to do.

  2. Consequences? by schwit1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How soon until a bureaucrat uses this data to determine that you shouldn't be permitted to own a firearm or are not fit to be a parent.

    1. Re:Consequences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this can prevent people from having children, hopefully like tomorrow.

    2. Re:Consequences? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How soon until a bureaucrat uses this data to determine that you shouldn't be permitted to own a firearm or are not fit to be a parent.

      Or vote?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Consequences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're thinking too small.

      The profit will be in passing laws that require everyone to run the app, and people it flags as "depressed" legally required to buy antidepressants from your friendly pharma megaconglomerate.

      China will pioneer forcing their population to use the app. From there it will spread to Europe and the USA.

      For the public profit^h^h^h^h^h^hhealth, of course.

    4. Re:Consequences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How soon until a bureaucrat uses this data to determine that you shouldn't be permitted to own a firearm or are not fit to be a parent.

      Or, even worst, not a bureaucrat but yourself, after trusting this "startup smartphone app"...

    5. Re:Consequences? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      How soon until a bureaucrat uses this data to determine that you shouldn't be permitted to own a firearm or are not fit to be a parent.

      How long until they're right?

      Obviously, I understand the concern here- and it is something to be concerned about... but what if the data could determine with 99.9% accuracy that someone wasn't fit to own a gun or be a parent...

      I'm not proposing they use data for those purposes... but if the data could say accurately- would it be right to use it? (assuming no constitution violations- it gets updated as need be).

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    6. Re:Consequences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 0.1% that you whose rights you completely trampled would sue this into oblivion. Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

    7. Re:Consequences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I've been looking out for the proposal to just ban people from voting. When the DNC loses elections they go batshit crazy.
      Lost to Regan - Bush flew on SR-71!
      Lost to Bush - Supreme court selected the winner.
      Lose to Trump - Electoral college is unfair, Russia!!!1!!1One!
      Lose House - Gerrymandering!
      Lose Supreme Court Pick - Supreme court is illegitimate

      You would think they would instead attempt to get middle class voters on their side, but it appears they think calling us racists and deplorables will scare us into voting for them and just accepting those names. I believe you are 100% correct in that the DNC will shortly start asking elections to not happen because they can't be done "fairly" (fairly being getting the results the DNC wants).

    8. Re: Consequences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even an issue really. Just can't have AC or smartphones or ever drive a car.

    9. Re:Consequences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How soon until a bureaucrat uses this data to determine that you shouldn't be permitted to own a firearm or are not fit to be a parent.

      Not fit to be a parent? We can only hope and pray for that shit.

      Stupid humans unfit for parenting have caused more harm than firearms ever will. In fact, you might even say it's a root cause of the firearm violence issue, so it make sense to prioritize the latter over the former in your list. We can start by putting a stop to bullshit welfare programs that pay humans to do nothing but sit around and breed. Fuck that nonsense.

    10. Re:Consequences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How soon until a bureaucrat uses this data to determine that you shouldn't be permitted to own a firearm or are not fit to be a parent.

      How long until they're right?

      Obviously, I understand the concern here- and it is something to be concerned about... but what if the data could determine with 99.9% accuracy that someone wasn't fit to own a gun or be a parent...

      The problem here is no matter how effective that kind of filtering would be, it would not be limited to only firearms or parenting. Once someone is determined to be unfit for anything, they will be blacklisted by employers. Just because someone may be unfit to be a parent doesn't mean they can't be a kick-ass employee, but employers (and more importantly insurance/liability) won't see it that way. At all. You will be blacklisted, and that will become the problem that dismantles the program altogether, putting us right back to square one.

    11. Re:Consequences? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Ohhhh, touched a nerve did I tovarisch?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    12. Re:Consequences? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

      How soon until a bureaucrat uses this data to determine that you shouldn't be permitted to own a firearm or are not fit to be a parent.

      The question isn't whether the government will have the authority to deprive various liberties based on mental health status - it will - but where the boundaries of that are.

      Presumably, this app would have the same status as a screening questionnaire - it could indicate that a closer look should be taken.

      It also sounds like the intended use is with people who already have mental health concerns.

      Can the information be abused? Sure. So can any information.

      Hopefully due process will still be honored - hopefully there won't be a #alwaysbelievetheappwithoutfurtherevidence or an #apptoo movement ...

    13. Re:Consequences? by schwit1 · · Score: 2

      When I said not fit to be a parent I was referring to the state taking children from parents.
      https://reason.com/blog/2018/0...

    14. Re:Consequences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "I believe you are 100% correct in that the DNC will shortly start asking elections to not happen because they can't be done "fairly""

      Yet it was Trump saying that millions of Dem votes were cast by illegals and that Russia plans to help the Dems in the midterms

    15. Re:Consequences? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      When I said not fit to be a parent I was referring to the state taking children from parents. https://reason.com/blog/2018/0...

      As it should, if severe mental illness prevents safe parenting. For example, a schizophrenic who is too busy hiding from the CIA agents in his teeth to even take care of himself, much less any children.

      Can such power be abused? Of course. As can any power that the state wields.

    16. Re:Consequences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "essential" and "temporary" are the important words.

    17. Re:Consequences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, I'm on board with this too. We have too many children. Let's have fewer and value the ones we have.

    18. Re:Consequences? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      "I believe you are 100% correct in that the DNC will shortly start asking elections to not happen because they can't be done "fairly""

      Yet it was Trump saying that millions of Dem votes were cast by illegals and that Russia plans to help the Dems in the midterms

      AC has apparently not paid much attention to history.

      Republicans wnat as few people to vote as possible. Their ideological leader Rush Limbaught was not at all facetious when He said that "When women got the right to vot is when it all went downhill" Here is audio of that from 2012. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Anyhow, disenfranchising more than half of the population is one of their goals.

      Keeping chocolate people disenfranchise is childs play compared to what they will do if allowed. There are indeed petitions to repeal the 19th amendment. http://fathersmanifesto.net/19... https://www.change.org/p/81-ma... But AC is either a Russkie Troll, or a very useful idiot of their fifth column.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    19. Re:Consequences? by Mkkby · · Score: 2

      True statement if you are asian, south american or african. Why can't these people join last century and discover birth control?

    20. Re:Consequences? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      The problem here is no matter how effective that kind of filtering would be, it would not be limited to only firearms or parenting. Once someone is determined to be unfit for anything, they will be blacklisted by employers. Just because someone may be unfit to be a parent doesn't mean they can't be a kick-ass employee, but employers (and more importantly insurance/liability) won't see it that way. At all. You will be blacklisted, and that will become the problem that dismantles the program altogether, putting us right back to square one.

      If the data were used as a public social score like China already has in place, yes. I would suspect that any accurate algorithm of trustable gun owners would not be the same as any accurate algorithm of trustable parents... so we're already talking about 2 separate groups. Someone you can trust with a gun you can't necessarily trust with a child and vice versa.

      I'm not proposing we legislate any of these social scores for allowing guns or children... the thought creeps me out- but I am proposing it just as a running thought.

      What if the scores were only shown when trying to become a parent or when trying to get a gun? I guess people might discriminate against couples without kids anyway assuming they failed the "child permit". Employers in this theoretical scenario couldn't see gun or parent social score tests.

      If anyone could see your social score we would end up with a system like China where you are restricted employment, and even what hotels you can stay at based on social score. That is mainly used for controlling the masses by giving dissidents a low score and anyone who is friends with dissidents- certainly government could use the parent/gun permits the same way.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  3. 10 Question Quiz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All outcomes end with you need some pills. If you can punch the monkey you can win free pills!

    1. Re:10 Question Quiz! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      ***ATTENTION***
      The app has diagnosed you with drepression
      Would you like to view some pretty pictures or be told to go for a walk?
      [FLOWERS AND SHIT] [GET THE FUCK OVER IT]


      Something like that anyway.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  4. Just what depressives need by stealth_finger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just what depressives need, a disconnected app experience. People need to get used to the idea an app isn't the be all and end all of solutions to problems. Seems like a cover to slurp up data if you ask me, not that anyone did.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    1. Re:Just what depressives need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, what you wrote sounds very paranoid. Have you been taking your medication?

      Love,

      B.B.

    2. Re: Just what depressives need by ememisya · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm... is a smart phone considered a substance?

  5. Data collected compiled and sold to Advertisers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All so they can more effectively manipulate you into buying shit you don't need or want.

    There are no humanitarian start ups in Palo Alto.

  6. Sure by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    And I have invented a machine that can diagnose illnesses based on a drop of blood. Doctors are trying to jump on the VC bandwagon.

  7. "data is encrypted" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    somewhere some russian or chinese hacker, or some government or insurance agency is going "challenge accepted"

    1. Re:"data is encrypted" by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      Especially if the data is not anonymized. Given the tricks that data criminals can use, the size, frequency and IP addresses of the messages might tell a lot without even trying to decrypt the message. And if they can decrypt it, oh boy...

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  8. Multiple Personality Disorder by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bought a dual SIM phone.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  9. Good use of accelerometer by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The way I imagine the app working is that it pokes at you more and more with questions until the point you throw the phone, at which point it uses force measurement to determine level of anger.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  10. good idea by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they could co-brand with Kleenex?

    "I see your depression score is above 21, click here to order a box of tissue."

    --
    -Styopa
  11. THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is depressing.

  12. Branding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And, of course, this study will be funded by the various pharmas, who will demand advertising space. Just to help "offset costs", of course.

    1. Re:Branding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pharmageddon...

  13. Funny by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    "treat some of today's most intractable medical problems: "

    'Intractable' literally means 'untreatable'.

    1. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course... look at all the commercials on TV for drugs. Notice one thing; they all treat the symptoms, but never the underlying issue. It's not profitable to cure people, but rather to string them along for years, making metric tons of cash on the backs of people that cannot really afford it.

    2. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      intractable
      intraktb()l
      adjective
      hard to control or deal with.
      "intractable economic problems"
      synonyms: unmanageable, uncontrollable, difficult, awkward, troublesome, demanding, burdensome
      "intractable problems"

    3. Re:Funny by mjwx · · Score: 1

      "treat some of today's most intractable medical problems: "

      'Intractable' literally means 'untreatable'.

      No it does not. Intractable means "hard to deal with".

      https://en.oxforddictionaries....

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  14. Phone usage itself? by Rastl · · Score: 1

    I use my phone mostly for email during the day (can't access at work) and leave it sitting when I get home. I have a tablet that I use for reading, surfing, and apps.

    Will they see my complete lack of phone use for most of the day as a sign of depression? Do they consider me out of contact with people when I'm doing that on a device they're not monitoring?

    As with so many things these days it's a case of "Technology can take the place of real people and make assumptions based on the data we expect".

    Needless to say I'm not downloading the app. And if it gets added to my carrier's bloatware it's going to be the last straw that makes me root my phone.

  15. This will be abandoned by strikethree · · Score: 1

    This will be abandoned when they find out that people being treated like slaves by the .01% causes depression. Since 99.9% are slaves, there is no point in finding out who is depressed, just pass the Soma out to everyone.

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  16. Prototype thoughcrime detector by forkfail · · Score: 1

    China's well on their way:

    https://www.businessinsider.co...

    And they've re-instated re-education camps:

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/10...

    Here in the West, though, it'll be packaged up as a "depression detector". Or maybe there will be achievements for wearing it for X hours. Who knows. Regardless, the level of intrusion into not only lives, but very mind and soul itself, should bother us all.

    --
    Check your premises.
  17. Detection is not treatment by macraig · · Score: 1

    Treatment is the quite difficult and expensive part of the equation. I note that the app does nothing to treat the symptoms of what it detects, but instead gives other "professionals" increased opportunity to profit from it.

    What problem does this app solve, again?

    1. Re:Detection is not treatment by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an app to find new people to give medication to. Big Pharma has to keep making massive profits.

  18. Emotional health? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shake it off you friggin cry babies!

  19. Funny, I just started watching Psycho-Pass. by sabbede · · Score: 1

    In which the government tracks the psychological states of the people, and blows them up for being too unhealthy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...