Slashdot Mirror


Google's CEO Says Tests of Censored Chinese Search Engine Have Been Very Promising (theverge.com)

At Wired's 25th anniversary summit, Google CEO Sundar Pichai said the company's internal tests developing a censored search engine in China have been very promising. Pichai is strengthening his commitment on the controversial search engine, codenamed Project Dragonfly, saying the potential to expose the world to more information is guiding Google's push into China. "We are compelled by our mission [to] provide information to everyone, and [China is] 20 percent of the world's population." Wired reports: Pichai was careful to emphasize that this was a decision that weighs heavy on the company. "People don't understand fully, but you're always balancing a set of values," in every new country, he said. Those values include providing access to information, freedom of expression, and user privacy. "But we also follow the rule of law in every country," he said. This is a reversal of a decision from about eight years, when Google pulled its search engine, which was also censored, from the Chinese market. Pichai said the time had come to reevaluate that choice. "It's a wonderful, innovative market. We wanted to learn what it would look like if we were in China, so that's what we built internally," Pichai said. "Given how important the market is and how many users there are," he added, "we feel obliged to think hard about this problem and take a longer-term view." In response to the company's decision to back out of a project with the Department of Defense, nicknamed Project Maven, to build AI and facial recognition technology, and the employee concerns surrounding it, Pichai said: "Throughout Google's history, we've given our employees a lot of voice and say. But we don't run the company by holding referendums. It's an important input. We take it seriously." On the issue of Maven, however, "it's more also the debate within the AI Community around how you perceive our work in the area."

158 comments

  1. Facial recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They didn't back out. They gave up trying to tell chinese people apart }:-)

  2. Beta test for using in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    After all, they can't let those pesky voters see just anything now, can they. They might not vote for the Dems.

  3. soon: worldwide! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You thought the censored version was just for China?

    1. Re:soon: worldwide! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At this point, why not. They already hide large amounts of information from people via their bubbling. Adding the extra step of removing things that they don't like seems like the natural step in the right direction.

      They really ought to be ashamed of themselves.

    2. Re:soon: worldwide! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, come to think of it, they've got a censored search engine in Europe too.

      Right to be forgotten == censorship.

  4. No Chinese Google in FEDERAL PRISON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry BING-bound TRUMP TRAITORS

  5. Feature Not Bug by mentil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the west, Google can only gather (and monetize) user data so much, before there starts to be public outcry, pushback, and Congressional hearings about them invading privacy to an unacceptable degree.
    In China, Google can gather user data as much as it wants, and gathering more leads to ambivalence from the public (because they're used to it) and praise from the local government. They get to play out their dream of having every search be tied to a person; and of course every site that includes code from google analytics, doubleclick etc. is tied to that, so they'll know many sites that each person goes to (all, if they use Chrome or Android).
    The proven most-effective pieces of personal data to harvest will be back-ported to Google's services around the rest of the world.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Feature Not Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "gathering more leads to ambivalence from the public (because they're used to it)" - I'm pretty sure that describes both China and the US. Actually I wonder given the different legal/social environments, which is more unreasonably ambivalent?

    2. Re:Feature Not Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong Project Name - Who started bookburning in the 40's? Why has it become trendy again?
      ThoughtFilter,,
      BrainFold,
      Shifty,
      SomeChing,
      DumberandDumber,
      CommiFilt,
      MissingBits,
      Opression.

    3. Re:Feature Not Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah ... big China connection ... if noone start blowing-up GOOGLE buses in SanFran ... where is feckin-A antifa when they are really needed ?

    4. Re:Feature Not Bug by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In China the domestic platforms already do all that and more. For example WePay is pretty much the universal way to pay for stuff now, even random street vendors accept it right up to luxury hotels. Of course all the search and social media platforms monitor and allow the government full access. So the situation with regards to privacy is already dire.

      In Europe Google has some of the strongest privacy controls of any major service. Way better than Facebook and Microsoft, for example. From what I read it's not too dissimilar in the US. You can go here to see the available controls: https://myaccount.google.com/p...

      So while it is possible that Google will abandon all that stuff for the Chinese market it's not certain, and perhaps we should at least see what they are proposing/doing first. If they did launch with even half those privacy controls it would be a huge deal for the Chinese market, making privacy a thing that people think and care about.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Feature Not Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " You can go here to see the available controls: " - Where do you go to see the "controls" of their undocumented "accidental, superficial or unavoidable" additional data collection? Or do you just take their sliding word they don't?

      https://money.cnn.com/2018/08/21/technology/google-data-collection/index.html

    6. Re: Feature Not Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Murrica, data find you!

    7. Re: Feature Not Bug by Type44Q · · Score: 1, Troll

      where is feckin-A antifa when they are really needed ?

      Drinking beers with the other cops and gov't contractors - after they've taken off their 'agent provocateur' costumes, of course.

    8. Re:Feature Not Bug by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      In Europe Google has some of the strongest privacy controls of any major service. Way better than Facebook and Microsoft, for example. From what I read it's not too dissimilar in the US. You can go here to see the available controls: https://myaccount.google.com/p...

      In Europe Google Analytics is used to stalk users as they move from website to website the same as any other country. Browser signals that indicate user preference not to be stalked are summarily ignored by these services owned and operated by a company with "the strongest privacy controls".

      Strongest privacy controls = requires you to create an account to manage the fate of SOME of the data they take from you regardless so for sure everything you do can most defiantly be tracked on an individual account holder basis.

      So while it is possible that Google will abandon all that stuff for the Chinese market it's not certain, and perhaps we should at least see what they are proposing/doing first.

      If they did launch with even half those privacy controls it would be a huge deal for the Chinese market, making privacy a thing that people think and care about.

      Chinese people don't think and care about privacy unless Google provides it. Good luck getting anyone to believe what you are selling.

    9. Re:Feature Not Bug by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      In the west, Google can only gather (and monetize) user data so much, before there starts to be public outcry, pushback, and Congressional hearings about them invading privacy to an unacceptable degree.
      In China, Google can gather user data as much as it wants, and gathering more leads to ambivalence from the public (because they're used to it) and praise from the local government. They get to play out their dream of having every search be tied to a person; and of course every site that includes code from google analytics, doubleclick etc. is tied to that, so they'll know many sites that each person goes to (all, if they use Chrome or Android).
      The proven most-effective pieces of personal data to harvest will be back-ported to Google's services around the rest of the world.

      You've just described fascism -- nominal private ownership with strong government control and partnership. The only thing missing is nationalism in rhetoric.

      "(Such-and-such) solution is so very Chinese!"

      n/m

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    10. Re: Feature Not Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nationalism in rhetoric is the only thing that differentiate fascism from communism. Apart from that both are effectively the same heap of junk.

  6. Re: CEO doesn't care about humanity, wants money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you claim to be a tolerant liberal

  7. Penile Delight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Europe's breakfast.

  8. Which people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "People don't understand fully" indeed, but maybe they aren't the people you think...

  9. Google search - king of irrelevant results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google sucks at finding most things anyway. The Chinese probably wont even notice.

  10. Oh bother! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't read this page in Beijing!

  11. F Google, use DuckDuckGo by He+Who+Has+No+Name · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Deplatform Google. Hit them in the wallet, it's all they understand.

    1. Re:F Google, use DuckDuckGo by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Hit them in the wallet, it's all they understand.

      Good luck with that. Using Duck Duck Go won't even register in the Google accounting department.

    2. Re:F Google, use DuckDuckGo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You want to f Google? Turn off your javascript and stop using their products. The less javascript you use, the less you can be profiled. When google finds harder to sell targeted ads, it'll listen (do not forget Google is an advertising company, every single of its products revolves around gathering data for advertising).

    3. Re:F Google, use DuckDuckGo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      startpage.com produces better search results than duckduckgo in my experience

    4. Re:F Google, use DuckDuckGo by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Presumably DDG pays Google for the use of their search API anyway.

      DDG's business model is to sell ads on its platform, so you have to trust that they won't use those to spy on you or infect your machine with malware. Unfortunately they seem to be using the Bing and Amazon ad networks.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:F Google, use DuckDuckGo by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Good luck with that. Using Duck Duck Go won't even register in the Google accounting department.

      That's kinda funny, because I remember when people said altavista would be around forever and google would never replace them.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:F Google, use DuckDuckGo by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Informative

      Presumably DDG pays Google for the use of their search API anyway.

      No, they actually don't.

      DDG's business model is to sell ads on its platform, so you have to trust that they won't use those to spy on you or infect your machine with malware. Unfortunately they seem to be using the Bing and Amazon ad networks.

      They use bing, and curate the ads served. Something fundamentally different, remember when companies had their own ad hosts and only allowed specific ads? Yeah...those were the days before giant ad networks spewing malware. Oh, the other way is via affiliate links aka you click on a product they get a cut. They also don't follow you around the internet like a crazy ex that just can't seem to let go.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re:F Google, use DuckDuckGo by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I tried their example of searching for "car", which they claim does not track you. I can't post the URL of the advert as plain text due to the lameness filter, so you will have to hover over the following:

      ad link

      So we have a bounce through yahoo.com, who do track you, "dartsearch.net" which is part of the DoubleClick network, a unique "ad_provider" ID and what looks like a number of other IDs. Also, it's HTTP, not even HTTPS, so now your ISP/employer has that data too.

      Finally, the link that you claim says they curate ads actually says

      By default, when you sign up for a Bing Ads account, your ads should automatically enter rotation into all of Bing's distribution channels including DuckDuckGo.

      In other words they throw up whatever Bing deems to be okay.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:F Google, use DuckDuckGo by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      So we have a bounce through yahoo.com, who do track you, "dartsearch.net" which is part of the DoubleClick network, a unique "ad_provider" ID and what looks like a number of other IDs. Also, it's HTTP, not even HTTPS, so now your ISP/employer has that data too.

      Strange because the result I see is fundamentally different. It's all HTTPS, the referrer ID is static when using different browsers, and only shows a different ID when using a VPN in turn a different country. Which is likely the reason that you're seeing something different. The ad server is the same - 'yhs' or yahoo.

      In other words they throw up whatever Bing deems to be okay.

      That's not what it says, and even at that unlike google they give you the option to "report bad ads."

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    9. Re:F Google, use DuckDuckGo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your curmudgeonly and bitter arrogance appears to lack understanding, awareness, and information to back it.

      DuckDuckGo is fast making its way into the realm of household brand awareness in various parts of the world. Very recently it doubled its search traffic within a year to nearly 30 million searches a day. For the past several years, in nearly every US-centric online discussion on a variety of common websites, any time the subject of search engines comes up, and particularly when the topic is Google and Bing alternatives, DuckDuckGo is mentioned. Major companies (like Spectrum and others) are recommending its use internally and to customers. It even has brand recognition in relatively nontechnical users who live out in the middle of nowhere.

      The OP didn't explicitly say anything about directly paying Google money. You know that. You're simply being obtuse and setting up a lame straw man there. However, for the sake of completeness, I'll point to you why your strawman is without merit. It's because Google makes its money from selling user data and targeted advertising. If users stop partaking in Google services, then their ability to make money off those cash cows is diminished. Thus, the target consumers for those products (i.e. data & ad sales) are willing to pay less.

      Your use of logic and common sense need some work.

    10. Re:F Google, use DuckDuckGo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we have a bounce through yahoo.com, who do track you, "dartsearch.net" which is part of the DoubleClick network, a unique "ad_provider" ID and what looks like a number of other IDs. Also, it's HTTP, not even HTTPS, so now your ISP/employer has that data too.

      Strange because the result I see is fundamentally different. It's all HTTPS, the referrer ID is static when using different browsers, and only shows a different ID when using a VPN in turn a different country. Which is likely the reason that you're seeing something different. The ad server is the same - 'yhs' or yahoo.

      In other words they throw up whatever Bing deems to be okay.

      That's not what it says, and even at that unlike google they give you the option to "report bad ads."

      Shocking, you got different results because duckduckgo is tracking you and serving you tailored results/ads, the very thing you switched to it to avoid... Also now your search results are terrible.

      They go through google, then they go through duck duckgo, each one tracking you. Your idea that they don't use google is false, it clearly says in the first sentence of the link you posted above that they only don't use google if you search for a specific question that can be answered through their auto wiki/stackoverflow filter box at the top.

    11. Re:F Google, use DuckDuckGo by mea_culpa · · Score: 2

      Search is such a tiny part of Google so replacing with DDG isn't enough.

      Gmail --> Protonmail
      Youtube --> Bit.Tube
      Maps --> Waze\H\H\H\H Well... I really hate that Google bought Waze
      Nest --> EcoBee, Honeywell, Ring
      Android --> Tizen, Gapps removed, Apple
      Waymo --> Tesla, Uber, etc

      What sucks is that Google is really hard to beat. They have the best talent and it sucks that they are abusing their power like this. I keep planing on deplatfroming them but it isn't easy when it works so well. They know this and are not worried one bit.

    12. Re:F Google, use DuckDuckGo by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Comparing Altavista to the global monopoly that is Alphabet Inc which is being investigated for anti-competitive practices makes no sense.

      A far more fitting comparison would be 1999 talking about 2000 being the year of linux on desktop. Altavista had functional superiority. That can easily be replaced. Google on the other hand is (to excuse my french) a fucking monster.

  12. Doesn't change the fact that its wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    immoral is as immoral does

  13. Wait...WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, the system they're NOT developing and not going to use to help one of the most evil governments on Earth oppress people is moving further along throught the development process and the testing is looking good? (or is that "bad" since it's intended for extreme evil?)

    Note to Google: 70+ years after WWII, IBM is still thought of by many as evil because they knowingly helped the NAZI regime procees the paperwork in their oppression program. Rolling the dice on China ia a HUGE gamble. If China ends up as the planet's big global superpower, you will brielfy be a rich part of tha machine (until they absorb you or replace you with a domestic alternative using tech reversed from your stuff). If on the other hand, China eventually fails as all such oppressive dictatorial governments do, you will become a global paraiah and your emplyees will be viewed like former Klansmen or NAZI collaborators.

    1. Re:Wait...WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Considering the US itself is moving in the direction of an authoritarian regime, another way to look at it is that Google are simply preparing for a possible future. They'll already have the tech in place if they're required to suppress dissident notions.

    2. Re: Wait...WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof?

    3. Re: Wait...WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me feelings are proof enough, thank you

    4. Re: Wait...WHAT? by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      You have two major figures in a political party outright calling for incivility and violence. You have many more people in that party calling for court packing or outright abolition of court oversight on pretty much every abuse of power imaginable. Smells like authoritarianism to me.

    5. Re: Wait...WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe for someone who knows dick all about history and political philosophy.

  14. hi CAPTCHA: colonist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So he's a traitor working for the Chinese against the U.S. government and people.

  15. Provide information? More like collect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are compelled by our mission [to] provide information to everyone, and [China is] 20 percent of the world's population.

    It is more likely to believe Google's mission is to collect information from everyone and turn it into profit. And the potential profit from collecting data in this huge market is simply too much for any CEO to resist.

  16. How Can I Use That?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't even read regular Chinese!

  17. well google by Torvac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "we would not sell technology to the nazis would we? but before anyone else does, we wil sell to the nazis ..." also "we feel obliged to think hard about this problem and take a longer-term view" pretty much means "fuck you we will do it and we dont care about your concerns". this machine kills .. it will collect data and will get you killed.

    1. Re:well google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh come now, Chase Bank is still around today and is still one of the largest and they directly worked with the Nazis. Chances are high that if you're in the US, you either bank with Chase, your company does, your landlord does, or someone else in your life dealing with a large amount of your money.

      You buy products from China. You send internet traffic to China. Don't say you don't - unless you live in a cardboard box you do, and even the people in a cardboard box (typically) have a cheap mobile phone, or use the internet cafe or library PCs which have many components from China.

      Stop using products from China (and since your brought up Nazis, any company from this list https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_companies_involved_in_the_Holocaust) , or get off your high-horse and come back down to reality.

    2. Re:well google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      People on Slashdot think too narrowly.

      You cannot shut off China's totalitarianism. It's too well entrenched and the truth is many Chinese historically prefer a harmonious society rather than an American definition of a free one. The only way to change it is gradually.

      If China doesn't have Google build this system, then they'll hire Alibaba or Tencent to do it. With Google doing it, an American company has the technology there, meaning there's an option to understand what is going on and possibly influence it. There is no option if Alibaba or Tencent does it.

      Standing by morals to the point where you have no ability to implement your morals is just stupid and unethical.

    3. Re:well google by houghi · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Hans ... are we the baddies?"

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:well google by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      "Hans ... are we the baddies?"

      Of course not Franz. The God-Emperor protects, bask in his radiant glory as a 1000 psykers are killed each day to protect us from chaos.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re: well google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Influence Google?? Lololololololol, exactly how do you propose that is going to happen? Google is found to be more evil every fucking year. We all know it. We talk about it. Some nerds whine about it. But absolutely no one outside Google has any influence whatsoever what happens inside google.

      They are so deeply evil they make the scumbags at FB look righteous.

    6. Re:well google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
                Because I was not a socialist.

      Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
                Because I was not a trade unionist.

      Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
                Because I was not a Jew.

      Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

    7. Re: well google by javaman235 · · Score: 2

      Thatâ(TM)s why a lot of responses here are misguided, China can make their own tech and will reject American influence peddling there, or data collection. This is a symbolic coin of some sort if it happens, part of a bigger deal...

      --
      -The art of programming is the pursuit of absolute simplicity.
    8. Re:well google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ford too , IBM

    9. Re:well google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come now, Chase Bank is still around today and is still one of the largest and they directly worked with the Nazis. Chances are high that if you're in the US, you either bank with Chase, your company does, your landlord does, or someone else in your life dealing with a large amount of your money.

      You buy products from China. You send internet traffic to China. Don't say you don't - unless you live in a cardboard box you do, and even the people in a cardboard box (typically) have a cheap mobile phone, or use the internet cafe or library PCs which have many components from China.

      Stop using products from China (and since your brought up Nazis, any company from this list https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_companies_involved_in_the_Holocaust) , or get off your high-horse and come back down to reality.

      No. People don't have to be paragons of all that is good and just in order to have a valid opinion.

    10. Re: well google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If China honestly can do all this without the US then the only possible reason they want Google there is to infiltrate Google and by extension influence the US.

      It cannot possibly work the way you describe. Least of all given the fact that basically all the leadership at google seem to be imported from other less free places without loyalty to the USA.

    11. Re:well google by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      If an american company is doing it, and has the technology there -- it just means that in 6 months to a year, all the Chinese companies will also have that same technology.

    12. Re:well google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >as a 1000 psykers

      Fuck's sake. It's either "a thousand" spelled out, or just "as 1000 [whatever]".

      You've effectively written "a one-thousand" and it's offensive to my grammar-nazist sensibilities.

    13. Re:well google by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what every major company said about investing in China. Look where that got us: Tiananmen Square in the 80s.

  18. Kanye left the Democrat thought plantation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Kanye has dared to leave the Democrat's thought plantation, where failed 19th century redisitributionist economics are force-fed to infants to create social "justice" (AKA racist quotas) crybullies.

    You can, too.

    Think for yourself.

    1. Re:Kanye left the Democrat thought plantation by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 0

      I do. Which is why I usually ignore posts like yours.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re: Kanye left the Democrat thought plantation by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      A shallow attention-grabbing man, with a shallow wife, who makes shallow music, is not who I want to emulate. I love hip hop but he's been overrated from the jump and has only slid from there. His recent trolling stems from a desire to stop the slide into irrelevance. But it has only served to solidify his status as a punchline among rap fans, and a meme among Trumpkins.

  19. New Slogan: "Be Evil, but Profitably!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's telling that Google has abandoned their famous "Don't Be Evil" maxim, only to follow up very quickly with the Dragonfly 'search engine'. At this juncture, it has become clear that what was once a high-minded, moralistic approach to technology has given way to the same ol' bogeyman that every supercorporation bows down and worships: the almighty dollar. I would make a comparison to Vichy France, but to the best of my knowledge, China holds no substantive leverage over Google aside from an additional 1.3 billion individuals to exploit for wicked profit.

    I've abandoned Google in its entirety; I don't even use it's (admittedly competent and comfortable) search engine anymore. Would that many more people do the same...

  20. Evil corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When did Google turn into such an evil entity?

  21. Re: CEO doesn't care about humanity, wants money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Liberals make an effort to understand culture. Conservatives fear any cultural other than their own.

  22. Google is rolling the dice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm amazed that Google wants to play this dangerous game. Who will benefit most is yet to be seen (sure as fuck won't be the plebs worldwide).

    China will eventually access and copy every bit of Google's data when they place on-site servers with the proper credentials to access anything stateside. This may really be a trap for China to suck away all of Google's information, not the other way around.

    That is, if they aren't already being partially blackmailed into this move because someone stateside already managed to steal Google's data (including the employee stuff). (Only partial blackmail because China's abundance of data and few limits on what to collect is the devil's own temptation for these corps.)

    I sure wouldn't want to be the people setting this up, it's playing with fire no matter how you look at it.

    1. Re:Google is rolling the dice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you pretend to be amazed? The only thing Google has ever cared about was money.

  23. Promising in what sense? by mugurel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the sense that people in China using Google search won't see what their government does not want them to see? Congratulations Google!

    1. Re:Promising in what sense? by fat_mike · · Score: 2

      Or, as it is in the United States, what Google doesn't want you to see.

  24. Re:Vladimir Putin liked this post. +1, Comrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seY78wuc38c - Republican hero explains why Trump is a bitchlike child and traitor in a thick Bavarian accent, for your consideration as you decide whether or not you have functional balls.

    I'm not sure how much Arnold would care to be called "Bavarian", since he's from Austria.

    (Speaking of Arnold... See https://www.theatlantic.com/po...)

    And please drop the hyperbole and calls for violence, you're just undermining yourself. Let the facts speak for themselves.

  25. Re:Vladimir Putin liked this post. +1, Comrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I said he had a thick Bavarian accent. I never called him "the Bavarian" so read more carefully. I don't know if I'd call it a thick Austrian accent or what that implies, that's my rationale there.

    What violence have I called for exactly? Trump is a traitor and the legal remedy for treason is the gallows. Or the firing squad but I prefer the gallows for treason. I'm old fashioned when it comes to traitors.

    Arnold agrees with me, Trump is a traitor - and like me I guarantee he didn't vote for Hillary and has zero political ambitions anymore. The facts DO speak for themselves and soon, a Grand Jury will also.

    Mueller bats last.

  26. But of course by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As Google already has a lot of experience censoring US search results, they're a natural to cooperate with the Communist Party of China. The whole brouhaha started when Google was going to use its power of search to bring down the CPC. This was at the time of the color revolutions and Google was feeling its oats. Moreover they still had the "Don't Be Evil" motto back then. Ah, memories.

    With Google's proven expertise in censorship and new-found willingness to be evil, I see a happy and prosperous future ahead for the CPC. They're going to need it, China is heading for a rocky time and they'll need every bit of help they can get repressing their own people.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:But of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moreover they still had the "Don't Be Evil" motto back then. Ah, memories.

      It was just a motto. You actually believed it? Yikes.

  27. psot frost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fist post you fall it!! Ha ha

  28. Minister of Love says ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    ... big brother watchmachine is doubleplusgood. All bow before the almighty chairman, all bow before the almighty Google.

    *Kneels and lapses into praising*

    Aaaaaaaaaaah,Goooooogle, aaaaaaaaaaah, Rama Rama Goooogle ...

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  29. Yeah, right by franzrogar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pichai: "People don't understand fully, but you're always balancing a set of values,"

    Yeah, right. On one side "Human Rights" values and on the other "Money".

    We clearly know your balances...

    1. Re:Yeah, right by mentil · · Score: 1

      That's why we need to move the fulcrum towards 'money' (which is, now that I think about it, a poor metaphor).

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    2. Re:Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right. On one side "Human Rights" values and on the other "Money".

      The question here is though, from the point of view of human rights in China, would the situation actually be improved by Google not entering the market at all? I mean, don't get me wrong, it's clear that Google has a profit-motive that's driving them to the Chinese market (as with any large corporation). At the same time, it's also clear that they cannot operate in said market without following the governments policy of censorship, and neither can anyone else.

      If Google (or other western companies) do not enter the market at all due to protesting the human right situation in China, then the Chinese market will continue to be dominated by Chinese mega-corporations which are all under direct control of the Chinese government. This move obviously damages Google's brand in the West but it is not clear to me that this outcome weakens the status of human rights in China because the alternative is leaving the Chinese consumers entirely on the mercy of government-provided services and search engines, which are arguably more nefarious than Google's.

      Put yourself in the shoes of a Chinese middle-class consumer with internet-access and a desire to open up the society: would you deem your situation better or worse if you had access to western search engines (even if you know they have to go through the great firewall) or would you think the best path for opening the Chinese society is by only having access to state controlled services?

      That's the real question here, it's not a black and white situation.

    3. Re:Yeah, right by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Pichai: "People don't understand fully, but you're always balancing a set of values,"

      Yeah, right. On one side "Human Rights" values and on the other "Money".

      We clearly know your balances...

      He's asking the wolf to eat him last.

      Make no mistake about it - China will eventually DEMAND that Google hand over all source and access to their intellectual properly. How/Why you ask?? Because they're a nation-state backed by a nuclear armed force. They can do damn well as they please, and there's nothing to stop them short of conflict should they press the issue.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  30. Values by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    Those values include providing access to information, freedom of expression, user privacy, and how to exploit them.

    There, fixed that for you.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  31. Like hell we "don't understand" by MikeRT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "People don't understand fully, but you're always balancing a set of values,"

    No, we fully understand what you're doing, and we don't agree with you that whatever good you think you're doing offsets the intrinsic evil of helping the central governing authorities in China monitor every search your users do.

    I am going to make a bet here: at some point, the Chinese government is going to ask for Google to help with AI research with direct military applications, and they will agree to do it. You will also not see rioting in their American campuses from the people who opposed participation here, and you certainly won't see them rioting and saying that helping the PLA is even worse than helping the US military. It will be exactly like wars during Democratic administrations where they suddenly support the troops, support the mission and call dissent treason.

    1. Re:Like hell we "don't understand" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Says the person by typing "china is evil" into their keyboard that's made in china, connected to a computer with most components made in china, sending over an internet router made in china, very likely to an ISP using equipment also made in china...

      But that's OK, it's only evil to financially support china when it is someone you don't like. Yourself and everyone you like, it's perfectly fine to do.

    2. Re:Like hell we "don't understand" by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      That's a good point. So, why are people protesting against Trump wanting to bring manufacturing back and out of China again?

      By-the-by though, if you look at a lot of computer hardware you'll find that a lot of isn't even made, manufactured, fabbed in China these days. Malaysia and Thailand are the hot manufacturing, fabbing places right now...at least until wages start rising. Interesting thing in that, people say countries "don't have long term plans" and all that. If it was true, you wouldn't see China and what they're doing in Africa these days. Give it another decade or so and if you thought "American" or "European" imperialism in that continent is bad, you haven't see what they're likely to pull.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:Like hell we "don't understand" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Because most people don't think China is evil and simply don't care. China today isn't the China of the 80s or even 60s, 70s despite what some news media would like to report.

      Also what exactly makes you think Chinese "imperialism" is going to be worse than American or European? You mean they are outright going to violently through military means colonize and practically enslave large portions of the population in Africa?

    4. Re:Like hell we "don't understand" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the person by typing "china is evil" into their keyboard that's made in china, connected to a computer with most components made in china, sending over an internet router made in china, very likely to an ISP using equipment also made in china...

      But that's OK, it's only evil to financially support china when it is someone you don't like. Yourself and everyone you like, it's perfectly fine to do.

      To be clear the above is in response to "No, we fully understand what you're doing, and we don't agree with you that whatever good you think you're doing offsets the intrinsic evil of helping the central governing authorities in China monitor every search your users do."

      Parent is talking about assisting government authorities to monitor Chinese users. You have removed all reasonable context and twisted it to imply something that was never stated. Then you proceeded to attack the strawman of your own creation.

      Hopefully meta mods will judge those upvoting such rank nonsense appropriately.

    5. Re:Like hell we "don't understand" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's imperialism, backed by a country that really doesn't care much about anyone other than China and the Chinese.
      Early European imperialism in Africa, think Belgium, is a good example of that. But they grew out of it.
      China's just getting started. And they have fond historical memories of telling other countries around them what to do. It was, in their minds, the golden age.

  32. It makes me wonder by Tsolias · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Google has been a home to many SJWs,
    yet they are the best in the business to offer fake news, manipulate results, track people with or without consent, spy on their users, treat their users as products and now here's another example of how proud they would've made Himmler.
    "get your censored search engine from the people's SJW-driven company NAO"
    "did the Natzees hurt your feelings? Don't worry, because diversity and inclusion always win. Get your Censored service for only $99.95. The first 10 orders get STD tracking for free" ....let the down-voting begin.

    1. Re:It makes me wonder by fat_mike · · Score: 1

      Why can I use my Moderator Points on every post but this one?

  33. Zyklon B testers say project is very promising by gDLL · · Score: 1

    too much of a stretch ?

  34. Pichai needs to go by BanHammer · · Score: 2

    The company has gone downhill ever since he joined,and a lot of sjw politics has been injected from around the same time. There must be enough pressure put on google to fire him or the authorities should just break it up into 10 different companies.

  35. The best education money can buy by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    Working so hard at getting the very best education.
    Dreaming of getting a top internet job after graduation.
    Finally getting the best internet job.
    Now working hard to totally control the net for Communist China.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:The best education money can buy by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      As long as they can get rich doing it, they don't care. Google is the biggest spyware company on the planet. The employees don't care.

  36. Google testing for widespread use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is Google interested in creating a censored China engine because it can be tested for possible deployment in the US or elsewhere? You have to wonder if many of these companies like Google find it attractive to be able to influence through search? For me Google's actions get more disturbing everyday, even the fact many of their empoyee's can now dictate what the company does and what projects to work on. Similar actions are taking place now at Microsoft where some employees don't want to company involved in certain projects. So the few influence the many??

  37. Profit motive by So_be_1t · · Score: 1

    The argument "We are compelled by our mission [to] provide information to everyone, and [China is] 20 percent of the world's population," is of course a defensible argument but the argument is purposefully not the full argument and meant to obfuscate from very primary goals that Google has. If they had been transparent with the motivation for profit and deepening global market dominance I could at least say they're being honest about their intentions and support that honesty (not the actual decision to create a censored version). They act as if they're balancing all values here without mentioning what were likely the key drivers for revisiting the Chinese market.

  38. Pichai has no spine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Itâ(TM)s sad to see Google cave in like this. Whatâ(TM)s worse is wrapping it in the language of âoedoing good for the Chinese people.â I think theyâ(TM)ll do just fine without you Pichai.

  39. Google's values - pro-China, anti-America? by sabbede · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How is it Google's "values" don't matter for crap when it comes to making money in China, but prevent it from helping the US military? Did nobody tell them that they're an American company? Why are they so eager to do business with a dictatorship that openly seeks to crush the US, while refusing to do business with the Department of Defense?

    China is an oppressive dictatorship that uses censorship to control its people. America is a democracy that values free and open information. Google values free and open information. Who is that Google wants to help and who is it that Google refuses to help?

    This is f'd up.

    1. Re:Google's values - pro-China, anti-America? by geek · · Score: 1

      Whats really funny is they will, in the end, have all of their IP stolen by China and come screaming and crying to the DOJ to help them. I see it with other companies every day.

    2. Re:Google's values - pro-China, anti-America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google probably thinks it can own China. Like it does the US.
      Good luck with that.
      Besides, how is the Chinese version different than the US version?

    3. Re:Google's values - pro-China, anti-America? by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      " Why are they so eager to do business with a dictatorship that openly seeks to crush the US, while refusing to do business with the Department of Defense? "

      If Google decides to go forward with their Chinese project, the US Department of Defense may force them into a choice.
      You can either work with us, or with the Chinese. But not both.

      Then again, it may come with US Intelligence's blessings as a view inside of China. So, publicly, the USG gives them hell, but secretly, ( those benefits they spoke of ) they're hoping it happens.

      Or, China may let Google build their search engine for them and, at some point in the future, seize all hardware and software and kick Google out. You KNOW they're never going to allow those servers to sit outside mainland China. Not going to happen.

      Who knows.

    4. Re:Google's values - pro-China, anti-America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The answer to that is easy. You see, the US has an R in power, so that's evil and wrong. You can't support the right, they do evil things. But China has a communist government, and communists are on the left. And as we all know, the left can't do anything evil, because they aren't on the right, so it's alright to help them. I mean, Marx was great after all, wasn't he?

      What's sad is, I'm moderately certain that there's a few people who actually think like that.

    5. Re:Google's values - pro-China, anti-America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marx was great at point out issues/conflicts between workers and employers. Without him, there's a good chance that work related regulations we have today wouldn't exist, and there's a good chance that we would still be living in an Upton Sinclair type world.

    6. Re:Google's values - pro-China, anti-America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did nobody tell them that they're an American company?

      They're not an American company. They're an international company. Their international headquarters is in Ireland. They have major R&D offices in dozens of countries.

    7. Re:Google's values - pro-China, anti-America? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      Because the US military has invaded and continue launching wars for over one hundred years, not counting the illegal occupation of Texas, California, and Hawaii, whereas China at most flickering with some regions and islands that they already have some (pre-PRC, typically internationally recognized) historical claims, and at the same time dramatically improve the actual human rights situation, comparing to the Qing and ROC periods, through economic development.

    8. Re:Google's values - pro-China, anti-America? by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's so wildly inaccurate that I'm amazed you managed to learn the words without picking up any facts. I don't know where to start refuting your claims, but they're so absurd and I just woke up so I'm not going to waste my time.

    9. Re:Google's values - pro-China, anti-America? by sabbede · · Score: 1

      When it comes to the DoD forcing them to choose, I fear that Google has already made its choice. At the same time, you're probably right that China would just steal everything, so the DoD could just play a little dirty and call Google "defence critical infrastructure".

    10. Re:Google's values - pro-China, anti-America? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the laugh. So you're saying the islands, that the UN condemned , are internationally recognized? Yes, recognized as being illegal.
      Please, tell me more about the illegal occupation of Texas, California and Hawaii.

  40. We misunderstood this whole time by SmSlDoo · · Score: 1

    It was always:
    Don't, be evil.

  41. Dragonfly - Sergey Brin's Yacht's Name by sasparillascott · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sergey Brin, one of the founder's of Google, was one of the main forces that pushed Google to leave China before. He has a Yacht named Dragonfly. Pichai has named this project to go back into China Dragonfly - from the outside it looks like a right in your face middle finger to Brin and what he said.

    The market there is already saturated for search engines, so its not like Google is going to make alot of money - but the moral standing Google has for not being there is valuable which the Google CEO doesn't seem to comprehend. Pichai is doing great for the stock price, but seems to have no moral compass other than do what makes the most money right now - its as if Scrooge is running the place. He does need to go - but the shareholders are loving this no concern for moral issues type of management style (Facebook style really), so no.

    1. Re:Dragonfly - Sergey Brin's Yacht's Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A moral compass is the one thing the rich are incapable of possessing.

  42. For whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I read the title of this one as: "Google's CEO Says Tests of Censored Chinese Search Engine Have Been Very Promising " I felt it begged the question. For whom? When you say something is promising, to whom is it making a promise? Not sure I buy this being a great idea though.

  43. Whether the water's salty or fresh, scum floats by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    Anybody who believes this is about giving the Chinese people more information just isn't paying attention. It's the exact opposite. This is about perfecting a censor-friendly search engine that will be jammed down our throats one way or another.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  44. Re: Kanye left the realm of factual info long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks NPC38592048, appreciate the contribution! Preach it!

  45. Registered /.ers like & use my work... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your software is just fine - well written, functional... I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine by mmell February 17, 2017

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant August 10 2015

    I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works. - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015

    I do use APK's host file on all my systems at home by OrangeTide December 01 2017

    I've never tried to belittle (APK's work), I've flat out said it's good - by BronsCon (927697)

    I like your host file system by Karmashock September 09 2015

    I would like to note that I find your hosts file admirable - by vel-ex-tech (4337079) on Tuesday November 24, 2015

    I personally use a HOSTS file blocker produced from a genius called APK by 110010001000 October 27 2017

    * AS TO THE QUALITY OF MY PROGRAMMING & HOW WELL IT WORKS vs. your JEALOUS "Lil' Jowie" bullshit, lol! Now my Hosts File Engine protects against Spectre & Meltdown.

    APK

    P.S.=> You can't DO BETTER YOURSELF... apk

    1. Re:Registered /.ers like & use my work... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your software is just crap - written in crayon, fictional... I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine as a punchline to a joke by mmell February 17, 2017

      Your premise that hostfiles are a good way to deal with advertising and malvertising is fucking insane - by JazzLad April 20, 2016

      his hosts "program" is actually a broken batch file by xenotransplant August 10 2015

      his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to be a laughingstock while consuming excessive amounts of alcohol by alexgieg September 25 2015

      I do use APK's host file in all my memes at home by OrangeTide December 01 2017

      I've never tried to belittle (APK's work), I've flat out said it's crap - by BronsCon (927697)

      I like your tinfoil hat by Karmashock September 09 2015

      that APK nut, I can't get him to stop talking about his piece of shit file by rogoshen1 Tuesday March 03, 2015

      I personally never would use a HOSTS file blocker produced from a retard called APK by 110010001000 October 27 2017

      APK

      P.S.=> When YOU do better than THAT by our /. registered peers, then talk (from behind your FAKE NAME for your FAKE LIE of a "so-called" WASTED life) - ok? apk

  46. what information ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Getting more information to the world whilst at the same time dictating the kind of information!

    Nothing ever changes with narcistic dictators.

  47. Re: CEO doesn't care about humanity, wants money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The post is correct. Subhuman Stinkdus act just like this. Even the westernized Stunkdus hate the fresh off the curry boat variety.

    Indians should be eradicated and quickly before they're allowed to breed anymore.

  48. Must be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Google friend has his kids in mandarin immersion courses

  49. Bullshit by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    They just want the censorship features to use them in voter manipulation.

  50. Re: Vladimir Putin liked this post. +1, Comrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please detail the high crimes and misdemeanors. With citations and facts.

    Crickets.

    See you at the Trump 2020 swearing in ceremony.

  51. Re: CEO doesn't care about humanity, wants money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    No. Liberals make up fantasies about how all non-Caucasian cultures are superior. Muslims are peaceful. Native Americans are The First Environmentalists, blacks are incompetent permanent victims of whites, Hispanics are the only people who can do hard manual labor, Asians are too smart and therefore do not get minority preferences they give to others, Jews are Muslim baby eating right wing Nazis, and so on.

  52. That's some pretty impressive spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So controlling the flow of information to align with the interest of the controlling party is still beneficial to citizens because at least they now have access to more information. Am I getting that right?

    This is guy is straight up evil.

  53. Hunter killer app for the Communist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The search engine ties the phone # to the search. The Chinese have the great fire wall which is meant to control in/out flow of information and would never allow free flow of information. The search engine will be used to go after dissidents. Pichai needs to be sent back to India. Google refuses to help the US government, as it enjoys the freedoms and protections of a democracy yet is eager to help a police state. This reflects very poorly on google and google employees.

  54. No, you don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand it is a balancing act. What I don't understand is why do I have to use your set of values.

  55. Leave Gmail by sycodon · · Score: 2

    I got a Gmail address ver early on. I was able to get one that was essentially my full name@gmail.com. I must have something like 50,000 emails in that account.

    I want out.

    Questions are:

    Which service is relatively new and might have more open addresses.
    How do I get my 50k emails OUT of gmail and the IN to the new service.

    I'd be willing to pay.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Leave Gmail by keltor · · Score: 1

      Moving to ANY mail server (with IMAP) with your own domain would be the way to go. This guy's script works just fine to the transfer: http://oskarhane.com/transfer-... I personally use a setup that's fairly similar to mailcow: https://github.com/mailcow/mai...

    2. Re:Leave Gmail by anegg · · Score: 1

      Which service is relatively new and might have more open addresses. How do I get my 50k emails OUT of gmail and the IN to the new service.

      Register your own domain name and have whatever e-mail address you want, including your full name if you like. There are domain registrars that even offer e-mail services: Hover, for one. It will cost you a relatively small amount of money on a recurring basis to host your e-mail with a provider like Hover, but it saves you the hassle of running your own e-mail server and it will give you complete control over your address.

      I have not attempted this on the scale which you name (50,000 e-mail messages) but consider trying IMAP as the way to get your messages off of Google and stored locally to your e-mail client or even onto another IMAP server if you like. I did it on a much smaller scale when I switched ISPs from Verizon to Comcast. I hope it goes without saying that you won't have your actual Gmail address in the new service.

    3. Re:Leave Gmail by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      Which service is relatively new and might have more open addresses.

      I've read good things about ProtonMail. It's the service I've been considering myself, although I haven't committed yet.

      How do I get my 50k emails OUT of gmail and the IN to the new service.

      Gmail supports IMAP, so you can do that with any IMAP-capable desktop email client such as Thunderbird. Configure both accounts in the client and simply copy the emails by hand. In my experience it's better to do this in batches of 100 to 500 emails at a time.

      If you'd like something more automated, you can write a small Python script using the OfflineIMAP module to first download you Gmail messages locally and then upload them to your new email provider. I used it years ago when the small business I worked for at the time switched email providers. It's pretty easy to do. I managed to write something that did the job in about half a day even though I didn't know Python at all at the time. It then took about five days for the 20 accounts or so to transfer. The few emails that didn't transfer failed because they had some malformed headers that the destination email provider disliked, so I had to fix those by hand before managing to successfully upload them too, which took one or two additional days.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    4. Re:Leave Gmail by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Thank You All.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    5. Re:Leave Gmail by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I'd go with the buy a service option. Namecheap, godaddy, and a bunch of others all offer relatively inexpensive mail services per year. Buy your domain and mail from a single vendor if you want a low-effort mail system almost as painless as GMail.

      ProtonMail is a different beast. It works best between people that both use ProtonMail or equivalent clients. This basically goes back to PGP (now GPG) encrypted email, where clients encrypt their mail locally and the server only stores encrypted mail without the keys. People that send you mail without having an encryption client, as far as I can tell, still have mail stored unencrypted (it would make little sense to encrypt it as ProtonMail would have those keys).

      I haven't run ProtonMail personally, opting for my own services, but I did check them out a few years ago.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    6. Re:Leave Gmail by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      People that send you mail without having an encryption client, as far as I can tell, still have mail stored unencrypted (it would make little sense to encrypt it as ProtonMail would have those keys).

      I don't think that's the case. On their Security page they say this:

      "(...) your data is encrypted in a way that makes it inaccessible to us. Data is encrypted on the client side using an encryption key that we do not have access to. This means we don't have the technical ability to decrypt your messages, and as a result, we are unable to hand your data over to third parties. (...) For this reason, we are also unable to do data recovery. If you forget your password, we cannot recover your data."

      The paid plan also provides the option of using one's own custom domain, so transferring services later wouldn't be difficult.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    7. Re:Leave Gmail by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      People that send you mail without having an encryption client, as far as I can tell, still have mail stored unencrypted (it would make little sense to encrypt it as ProtonMail would have those keys).

      I don't think that's the case. On their Security page they say this:

      "(...) your data is encrypted in a way that makes it inaccessible to us. Data is encrypted on the client side using an encryption key that we do not have access to. This means we don't have the technical ability to decrypt your messages, and as a result, we are unable to hand your data over to third parties. (...) For this reason, we are also unable to do data recovery. If you forget your password, we cannot recover your data."

      Exactly - read what's there and what I said. There's no difference. :) Truly secure PGP (GPG) encrypted mail requires a unique Public/Private key pair on each unique email user's client(s) meaning that there could be multiple email clients in use by a single user on a single account. User A has a pair, and User B has a pair, for those 2 to communicate, they must first share their public keys. Which admittedly ProtonMail could be the repository of, or A & B could keep one or both locked away only to be shared as they wish. In any case, ProtonMail doesn't have the private key(s) so can't decrypt the email.

      Now, I happen to know for a fact that you can send email from a non ProtonMail client to a ProtonMail address. That means that there's no key pair on the sender's client, and no way for that mail to be encrypted. There is no way around that simple fact, and those emails will be sent in plain text and remain in plain text everywhere it goes, even if it goes through an encrypted pipe like SSL or a VPN.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    8. Re:Leave Gmail by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      and no way for that mail to be encrypted

      I think you're confusing two things. One is the encryption or lack thereof of the e-mail contents. Another is the encryption or lack thereof of the mailbox. Their mailbox is encrypted using the same same public key used to send PGP e-mail to you. As such, your private key is needed to unlock both the mailbox and, within it, the body of any PGP-encrypted e-mail. They explain this here.

      So, while it's true that non-PGP-encrypted e-mail you received was sent and remained as plain text while in transit, after received it's encrypted and then stored in that state. Of course that isn't as good as receiving PGP-encrypted e-mail directly, but it's better than having your mailbox sitting on the server with all the plain text e-mail in it still as plain text. At least hackers won't get them if they break into the server. And if it's true that ProtonMail itself doesn't keep a copy for themselves on the side, neither will their staff.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    9. Re:Leave Gmail by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      Oops! The missing link: How to use PGP.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    10. Re:Leave Gmail by kwoff · · Score: 1

      What do you gain by copying the 50k emails elsewhere? (I used to keep old email, but in the past few years I burn almost everything older than a year or so if I haven't already trashed it. It can be liberating.)

    11. Re:Leave Gmail by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I think you're confused. :) Even if they encrypt the mail - they can decrypt it. You need a private key to encrypt and anything you encrypt, you can decrypt. So they are misleading you if they say they're encrypting unencrypted mail (the case when someone, say a gmail person, sends email to a protonmail account) there is absolutely no way that the protonmail people can encrypt that email, allow you to decrypt it, and not be able to decrypt it themselves. PGP doesn't work that way. So, while it's true that it's not readily readable by anyone that hacks the server, it's also not true that no one can easily read that email. That said, there is a case I can think of where they conceivably could not decrypt - they could create a 1 time use public private pair, encrypt with the user's public, and then toss the just generated pair. But what they likely do is periodically create a utility key pair for this purpose and toss them when they are replaced. Creating a key-pair is a non-trivial computation so likely using a couple of keys and swapping them out after 'x' uses or 'y' time would be best. It'd be interesting to know what they do as they could conceivably decrypt select email(s) for the hopefully short key retention time and how many accounts such a key would be used for. There are no other possibilities.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    12. Re:Leave Gmail by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      You need a private key to encrypt and anything you encrypt, you can decrypt.

      No, you need a public key do encrypt. The private key is for decrypting. So, yes, they can encrypt anything you receive by having your public key, and they only you can read the encrypted version.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    13. Re:Leave Gmail by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      You can delete them from your view in Gmail, but you can't really delete them.

    14. Re:Leave Gmail by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      No, you need a public key do encrypt. The private key is for decrypting. So, yes, they can encrypt anything you receive by having your public key, and they only you can read the encrypted version.

      I see my data is outdated (I've not delved into the specifics in a really long time, obviously) Originally, the entire PGP process was RSA encryption, which IIRC required a private key. Now I see that PGP 2 and later shifted to a different non-compatible encryption scheme. Interesting. Always like learning new stuff.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  56. Google ALREADY OWNS you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are still naive about Google being EVIL and that they don't control your thoughts by limiting search results then keep on using Google products and pay the price. Eventually, you or your children will pay with their lives as Alphabet will help China to destroy everything. One evil country plus one evil company makes one unholy alliance to control everyone.

  57. Re: CEO doesn't care about humanity, wants money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget Caucasians are the Gog and Magog.

  58. Filtering != Killer drones by jaamkie · · Score: 1

    I don't have a problem with Google agreeing to some filtering in order to enter China, but I'd like to see them publish their filtering criteria and advocate for less restriction over time. I mean everyone here is ignoring the DMCA takedown situation when they act like we in America don't allow those with power to make arbitrary takedown demands. Project Maven is a far more troubling issue... There are enough techies refusing to do defense work to cause a significant salary premium for those who are willing, but not the universal refusal that would be necessary to stop it from happening. Given that it is happening, I'd prefer targeting with less false positives... The military culture of secrecy and CYA is quite problematic for democracy because without a clearance and need to know you can't get the data to fairly judge if they are doing the right thing or not.

  59. Re: CEO doesn't care about humanity, wants money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. corrupting the earth and spreading fassad. One group accepted Judaism on a saturday evening and another Christianity on a sunday morning. Giving birth to the Judeo-Christian zionist alliance Britain, USA, Australia all the same scum.

  60. Google Translate by jrumney · · Score: 1

    Corporate Speak -> English

    A billion potential users is a lot of extra advertising and other data mining related revenue. We cannot resist.

  61. Don't Be Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google has lost their way, this is exactly what their "Don't Be Evil" slogan was referring to. Companies get to big and to greedy and do evil things. Participating in the repression of humans, way to go Google!

  62. And Eric Schmidt was better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really miss the man who was famous for saying
    â"â"-
    If you donâ(TM)t want people to know what youâ(TM)re doing on the internet then maybe you should t be doing it.
    â"â"-

    Google has been evil for at least 10 years. Pichai is just the man currently holding the hatchet.

  63. #GoogleNoHire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And thatâ(TM)s why you should never hire someone leaving Google unless itâ(TM)s for reasons of conscience.

    Make Google these peopleâ(TM)s last career move.

  64. #DontHireGooglers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thatâ(TM)s not enough, you also have to make sure that people understand that there are social consequences to their antisocial actions. Anybody who chooses to work for google at this point knows what they are doing and by definition should not be trusted with an iota of authority or responsibility.

    Google should be one of the biggest red flags in any resume. They are likely to be an over entitled, underskilled rat with either no ethics or no sense.

  65. If you are ready to stop using Google tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are ready to stop using Google tools then how about the tools who work for them? Take things a step further and refuse to work with or hire anyone with the stink of Google on them.

        See how long the company can keep going when only the worst and most desperate will sign on, knowing it may be their last job in the industry.

  66. Why it will be worse by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    Also what exactly makes you think Chinese "imperialism" is going to be worse than American or European?

    For the same reason that Roman imperialism was significantly uglier than Christian European imperialism: pagan cultures--which China functionally is--don't tend to place anywhere near as much value on human life as Christian-influenced ones.

    Those values you probably have about equality, tolerance, love, etc.? Those aren't universal. They were religious values that the Church spent centuries stamping into a high pagan culture where violent revenge, slavery and hatred were not only normal, but celebrated as good.

    1. Re:Why it will be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Total bullshit. This is another white man's burden type trash type of argument. Chinese political/religious culture has always espoused ideas of benevolence. In fact it's pretty much entrenched in Chinese's concept of rule under Confucianism as well as religiously under Buddhism. Concepts that have over a 2000 year history in China.

      In fact an intellectual/academic argument right now going on in China is that America's rule over the world hasn't been very benevolent at all, and very much one of fear. The worst type of hegemon, basically an outright tyrant that totally goes against Chinese Confucian ideals of what a hegemon/ruler should be like. Read about the Confucian idea of the "kingly way" if you ever get the chance to get a better understanding of China's traditional political mindset.

    2. Re:Why it will be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "confucian" debate is just like the Russians falling back on the Orthodox church: A tie to past periods in which they viewed themselves as powerful and important.
      The Chinese Communist party, not long ago, actively attempted to rid China of Confucian anything. Why would I trust the "intellectual /academic argument in China right now" at all? An intellectual discussion controlled by the government is invariably going to side with the government. Or disappear.

  67. Motto's still there. Don't let them off the hook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Don't be evil" is still right there at the bottom:
    https://abc.xyz/investor/other/google-code-of-conduct.html

    That means it's still your civic duty to call them on it when they do bad shit.