Slashdot Mirror


Actors Are Digitally Preserving Themselves To Continue Their Careers Beyond the Grave (technologyreview.com)

Improvements in CGI mean neither age nor death need stop some performers from working. From a report: From Carrie Fisher in Rogue One: A Star Wars Story to Paul Walker in the Fast & Furious movies, dead and magically "de-aged" actors are appearing more frequently on movie screens. Sometimes they even appear on stage: next year, an Amy Winehouse hologram will be going on tour to raise money for a charity established in the late singer's memory. Some actors and movie studios are buckling down and preparing for an inevitable future when using scanning technology to preserve 3-D digital replicas of performers is routine. Just because your star is inconveniently dead doesn't mean your generation-spanning blockbuster franchise can't continue to rake in the dough. Get the tech right and you can cash in on superstars and iconic characters forever.

[...] For celebrities, these scans are a chance to make money for their families post mortem, extend their legacy -- and even, in some strange way, preserve their youth. Visual-effects company Digital Domain -- which has worked on major pictures like Avengers: Infinity War and Ready Player One -- has also taken on individual celebrities as clients, though it hasn't publicized the service. "We haven't, you know, taken out any ads in newspapers to 'Save your likeness,'" says Darren Hendler, director of the firm's Digital Humans Group. The suite of services that the company offers actors includes a range of different scans to capture their famous faces from every conceivable angle -- making it simpler to re-create them in the future. Using hundreds of custom LED lights arranged in a sphere, numerous images can be recorded in seconds capturing what the person's face looks like lit from every angle -- and right down to the pores.

16 of 117 comments (clear)

  1. Only a phase by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The next step will be digital actors, created from scratch. These don't age at all, do exactly what you want, don't act like divas and will work for peanuts.

    1. Re:Only a phase by olsmeister · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most of the CGI, at least character CGI, with today's technology is still pretty obvious to me and it bugs me when I'm watching a movie. If I wanted to watch a cartoon, I would have watched a cartoon. It's way, way overdone especially with all the superhero movies that are being shat out of Hollywood these days. I'm all for a little subtle and unobtrusive enhancements to add to the storyline, but I sometimes get the feeling they're trying to save money on production by just doing everything possible with CGI and it really hurts the quality.

    2. Re:Only a phase by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Most of the CGI, at least character CGI, with today's technology is still pretty obvious to me

      It is only obvious when it is obvious. There is plenty of CGI in movies that you don't even notice because it is done so well.

      Character CGI is improving rapidly. Fully fake actors are already a thing in Japan. They even have fan clubs. They will be common in American films as well within a few years.

    3. Re:Only a phase by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sigh...what bugs me about this tech isn't an actor that CHOOSES to use this to help his/her family after they are gone, its using this tech to drag dead famous people from the grave to be corpse puppets while having had zero say in the matter!

      I mean you know have a Roy Orbison zombie on tour, as is zombie Dio,Michael Jackson's Thriller is now real as they make his corpse Moonwalk so they can wring a few more shekels out of him, its really disgusting. I don't even wanna know what they are gonna end up doing to actresses with this shit, are they gonna have Marilyn Monroe doing an American Pie sequel? Maybe stuff Judy Garland's corpse in the next Wizard Of Oz to say some double entendres they can stuff in the trailer? Or what about the actors and actresses that still have some name recognition but who aren't making any bank for whatever scumbag relatives have the rights? How long before one of them shows up in a "its not (insert blank) XXX" porn parody?

      Its one thing if the person chose, its their face and name after all, and they can put in clauses on what is and is not allowed, but those that are already dead? Yeah if its one thing we've seen its that there is pretty much zero respect for the dead if someone thinks they can make a buck off the body and as this tech gets better and cheaper? I'm betting shit is gonna get even worse than what we are seeing now which is already getting pretty gross IMHO.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:Only a phase by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its one thing if the person chose, its their face and name after all, and they can put in clauses on what is and is not allowed, but those that are already dead? Yeah if its one thing we've seen its that there is pretty much zero respect for the dead if someone thinks they can make a buck off the body and as this tech gets better and cheaper? I'm betting shit is gonna get even worse than what we are seeing now which is already getting pretty gross IMHO.

      You raise some interesting copyright questions with your moral ones.

      E.g., if we can't even use a cartoon mouse from the 1920s, why can we use these dead actors?

    5. Re:Only a phase by fafalone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      'AI' assisted "deepfakes" are only going to get better, so one day every actor will be in porn movies whether they like it or not. And of course that's only a stepping stone to the glorious day in the future where I can download my Lucy Liu-bot.

    6. Re:Only a phase by AlwinBarni · · Score: 2

      Not only this, there are digitally created characters, who have holographic performances attracting huge crowds of fans.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    7. Re:Only a phase by Dorianny · · Score: 2

      Not a lawyer but the "personality rights" are probably owned by the dead actors estate. Might be a good idea for actors to call their lawyers and draw up "personality usage" clauses

    8. Re:Only a phase by Calydor · · Score: 2

      "He touched my bits!"

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  2. The interesting question is by bobstreo · · Score: 2

    who owns the rights to the digitization?

    I'd imagine "forward looking" studios including their ownership in contracts to the point where actors don't own their own faces.

    The next step is digitizing the voices...

    1. Re:The interesting question is by anglico · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This came up before when the studio replaced Crispin Glover in Back To The Future 2, and he sued them for using his likeness.

      From the wikipedia article:
        Dissatisfied with these plans, Glover filed a lawsuit against the producers, including Steven Spielberg, on the grounds that they neither owned his likeness nor had permission to use it. Due to Glover's lawsuit, there are now clauses in the Screen Actors Guild collective bargaining agreements which state that producers and actors are not allowed to use such methods to reproduce the likeness of other actors.[7]

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...

  3. Porn Applications! by Zorro · · Score: 3, Funny

    So now you can have anyone from any time do any thing for your ammusement.

    Going to be lots of Wookie Porn!

  4. No End To It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The film industry continues to tighten its grip on its assets, refusing to ever let them go. Trademarks will never expire. Actors will never expire. Nothing will slip from the industry's fingers into the public domain, or off this mortal coil. The long-deceased continue to act in films for all eternity. Their descendants ask when they'll be allowed to rest in peace. They demand the spirit of their long-buried grandfather be allowed to stop being paraded in sequel after inferior sequel, layering shame on their once respected career. Every film is now its own weekend at Bernie's, every summer comedy a macabre sideshow of all the actors whose likeness the studio has purchased. The family begs an end. Stop putting their dead Oscar and Emmy winning father in American Pie sequels. The industry executive laugh. The family has no claim. The actor is intellectual property. They belong to the industry. Forever.

  5. Reminds me of "The Congress" by djbckr · · Score: 2

    The Congress with Robin Wright. It's part of the storyline that she gets scanned so she doesn't have to act again.

  6. Re:The next step by whoever57 · · Score: 2

    Actors will be all-CGI entities. Studios are obviously interested in this - imagine how much money they will save per movie by not having to pay the salary of the prima donna of the moment.

    I am not sure it will be so simple. People choose the movie they will watch based in part on the actors in the movie. Think of the actors' salaries as a promotional expense.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  7. Some of this technology is good. by Jhon · · Score: 2

    I remember watching Tron: Legacy and the "young-ified" Jeff Bridges looked creepy and fake.

    Then the first Ant-Man had a "young-ified" Michael Douglas. It was much better, but still looked "off"

    Then the latest Ant-Man -- again, had a "young-ified" Micheal Douglas. The only "odd thing" about it was how good it looked. Knowing how he actually looks today made it difficult to look at him on-screen "young-ified". It was almost perfect.

    We're talking about a short space of time for this improvement. Now imagine movies like Forrest Gump with better "high school" looking Gump -- and "college" looking Gump. One who looks more like the age their supposed to be -- and not just the actor with makeup and period clothes.

    Also, it would be a good "insurance" policy for filming projects -- in case an actor dies ore becomes incapacitated during filming they can finish the "job" they signed on to.

    Creating new material from dead actors? I'm very uncomfortable with. Even if we make it illegal we'll still see it. Hell, I can spend $20 for a MTG Black Lotus forgery that's nearly impossible to tell from the real thing (worth a few grand at least) from somewhere in China.