Slashdot Mirror
Remote South Atlantic Islands Are Flooded With Plastic (smithsonianmag.com)
Thirty years ago, the ocean waters surrounding British islands in the South Atlantic were near-pristine. But plastic waste has increased a hundredfold since then, and is ten times greater than it was a decade ago. From a report: The islands of the British Overseas Territories in the South Atlantic, including St. Helena, East Falkland, and Ascension Island, are so tiny and remote that most people don't even realize they exist. For centuries, that kept them relative clean and pristine, but in recent decades discarded straws, fishing nets, and millions of bits of degraded plastic have begun washing up on their shores. Now, reports Marlene Cimons at Nexus Media, that pollution is getting even worse. A new study in the journal Current Biology shows that plastic trash on the beaches and in the ocean has increased tenfold in the just the last decade and a hundredfold over the last three decades.
During four research cruises between 2013 and 2018, researchers from the British Antarctic Survey and nine other organizations aboard the RMS James Clark Ross sought to quantify the plastic around the islands. The crew took samples of marine debris from the water's surface, the water column, the seabed and the beaches. They also investigated plastic ingestion in 2,243 animals comprised of 26 different species ranging across the marine food web from plankton to apex predators, like seabirds; all were found to consume plastic at high rates. What they found was plastic, and lots of it. About 90 percent of all the contaminants they analyzed were made of plastic, which abundant in the ocean, on the beach and inside the animals.
During four research cruises between 2013 and 2018, researchers from the British Antarctic Survey and nine other organizations aboard the RMS James Clark Ross sought to quantify the plastic around the islands. The crew took samples of marine debris from the water's surface, the water column, the seabed and the beaches. They also investigated plastic ingestion in 2,243 animals comprised of 26 different species ranging across the marine food web from plankton to apex predators, like seabirds; all were found to consume plastic at high rates. What they found was plastic, and lots of it. About 90 percent of all the contaminants they analyzed were made of plastic, which abundant in the ocean, on the beach and inside the animals.
If so, go after the offenders for littering.
I've checked the link in the article. I've sourced the original press release. Where are the pictures? If you want to make a difference with this type of news, show us the impacted shoreline, instead of one shot that might be a few square feet of beach. It seems ridiculous that this is all the visual impact that accompanies such a dire press release. It leaves the skeptic in me feeling that it's not as bad as it sounds.
Is there a better example of the Tragedy of the Commons than the worlds oceans?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
...we should immediately bring the full front of US Foreign Policy against the five countries that put out more than the rest of the world combined: China, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam.
China might be a bit of a realpolitik pass (or at least warning) given its economic position and (more validly) the fact that it has the highest population in the world. Everyone else? Tell them to knock it off, and then go bomb them if they don't.
Think that's too harsh, but the US needs to ban straws? That's a clear sign that you're simply not serious about the issue and are more interested in meaningless, performative wokeness than you are in a utilitarian solution.
Hire a Linux system administrator, systems engineer,
Ironically, it's the communists and poor-as-fuck proletariat.
The rich capitalists want clean communities, and have therefore built massive recycling and waste-management industries.
Long live Capitalism.
It is not too late.
Soylent Oceanographic Survey Report, 2015 to 2019 , right on schedule.
The Tragedy of the Commons implies there must be a strong owner to maintain order over a resource.
* The Socialists say the owner should be a centralized government.
* The Capitalists say the owner should be private (an individual or organization).
Which one should it be?
Well, history has shown that a giant gun-toting monopoly is generally a bad idea, and that checks and balances between competing powers is a much better idea, and that governmental levers of power corrupt business men into paying for favors rather than doing the hard work of market satisfaction. So, the answer is clear:
Privatize the damn oceans; make it much easier to enforce property rights.
This is the exact same conclusion reached by the tree-hugging environmentalists of the Amazon, who say that a government is too easy to corrupt and so they want the owners of the rainforest to be those people who have an intimate relationship with the land—they want the owners to be the people who have lived near and around it for generations, and who will therefore not only maintain the property as a matter of identity, but who will also find ways to use it sustainably as a matter of self-preservation.
An externality is a lack of property rights.
Civilization requires much Much MUCH more expansive and strict property rights than exist currently.
I've checked the link in the article. I've sourced the original press release. Where are the pictures?
here https://phys.org/news/2018-10-...
here https://www.bas.ac.uk/project/...
here https://www.bas.ac.uk/project/...
The problem is that some countries allow plastic waste in their rivers.
For example: Five Asian Countries Dump More Plastic Into Oceans Than Anyone Else Combined: How You Can Help (Apr 21, 2018)
...why not use it as garbage catcher? ,that has to travel to a spot where there's much plastic, to collect it.
They built an expensive boat and released a couple of days ago
Here the plastic comes to them by itself. Why not use it and burn it in emission-free ovens to generate electricity.
Sheesh people, you see challenges; I see opportunities ... it washes up there? Scoop it up off that very beach then and dispose of it properly. Win!
Wow! An actual, worldwide, empirical, environmental issue to confront and resolve. Where is the UN, Greenpeace and other assorted environmentalists? Too busy tackling 'carbon pollution' and 'global warming' I suspect.
We just need some really big plastic bags to put all this in.
Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
DISPOSE of it?
Sounds like an untapped resource to me.
And you could probably get the greenies to pay you for cleaning it up while you sell the material back to the Chinese plastic factories.
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
I know there are people who want to blame "The West" for everything including this plastic issue, but I just returned from SE Asia and I can say first-hand that the use of plastic *anything* is so widespread over there. They wrap their plastic in plastic, and then wrap it in plastic again. And the idea of proper garbage disposal does not exist. EVERYONE opens the window and just throws it out.
This is not an issue "The West" has caused. This is an issue the SE Asians have caused. (P.S. I am married to an Asian, so this is not about race, just about facts).
FIFY!
and then set on fire for his advocacy of pollution. KILL THIS FAGGOT FOR REAL, MAKE A DIFFERENCE. Propagandist pollution-mind scumbags need to be tortured to death as they deserve. FIND THIS BITCH. END IT.
Being married to "an asian" doesn't actually confer you any argument points, and yellow fever sexual fetishism is fucking disgusting.
Pussy is pussy.
and yellow fever sexual fetishism is fucking disgusting.
My favorite kind of porn is definitely not disgusting.
"His name was James Damore."
Funny how they always find these things in remote places that are almost impossible to verify. Yet the beach down the road from me gets the same amount of debris as ever. Maybe the plastic just wants to be left alone which is why it seeks out these remote places?
"We could build a small processing plant on the island to haul the plastic in, and pack it into cubes for shipment elsewhere for recycling."
"Great idea! Here, fill out an environmental impact form and perform a $30 million study of the fauna on the island and fend off these 11 lawsuits trying to stop you, and get approval from a president who is pressured to not approve it for reasons unrelated to the allowed reasons Congres told him to consider and maybe, just maybe, this process will be completed in 3.5x the time it took China to build the Three Gorges dam."
The problem is that those five countries are in the Pacific and Indian Oceans, not the Atlantic. Some waste may make the trip across the equator (except for Indonesia which is mostly below the equator) and down into the Southern Ocean and back up into the Atlantic, but the prevailing ocean currents generally don't encourage that.
It is if you're a third wave feminist or a 19th century Victorian.
Maybe the Argentines can clean it up, since they say the Falklands are part of their territory...
I'm sorry a racist fuck like yourself doesn't find Asians attractive.
You are most likely one of those gross dipshits that are in to feet
Not just Asians. Several years ago while deployed to the Balkans I noticed that the high water mark on the rivers and streams was indicated by the fact that that's where the thick layer of plastic waste ended. In the US you find the occasional plastic bag along the shore of a river, in Kosovo you found the occasional bare spot not coated in plastic.
Go back to reddit you stupid twat.
The se asia tsunami in 2004 killed 230,000 and sucked their debris into the ocean. The 2011 Japan tsunami wiped entire towns off the map. If your island is in the Pacific ocean debris flow channel, you are going to see ALL the garbage. Still bad, but it aint all from losers throwing their plastic water bottles off a bridge...