Slashdot Mirror


Ajit Pai Killed Rules That Could Have Helped Florida Recover From Hurricane (arstechnica.com)

sharkbiter shares a report from Ars Technica: The Federal Communications Commission chairman slammed wireless carriers on Tuesday for failing to quickly restore phone service in Florida after Hurricane Michael, calling the delay "completely unacceptable." But FCC Chairman Ajit Pai's statement ignored his agency's deregulatory blitz that left consumers without protections designed to ensure restoration of service after disasters, according to longtime telecom attorney and consumer advocate Harold Feld.

The Obama-era FCC wrote new regulations to protect consumers after Verizon tried to avoid rebuilding wireline phone infrastructure in Fire Island, New York, after Hurricane Sandy hit the area in October 2012. But Pai repealed those rules, claiming that they prevented carriers from upgrading old copper networks to fiber. Pai's repeal order makes zero mentions of Fire Island and makes reference to Verizon's response to Hurricane Sandy only once, in a footnote. Among other things, the November 2017 FCC action eliminated a requirement that telcos turning off copper networks must provide Americans with service at least as good as those old copper networks. This change lets carriers replace wireline service with mobile service only, even if the new mobile option wouldn't pass a "functional test" that Pai's FCC eliminated. Additionally, "in June 2018, Chairman Pai further deregulated telephone providers to make it easier to discontinue service after a natural disaster," Feld wrote.
In response to Pai's deregulation, Feld wrote: "The situation in Florida shows what happens when regulators abandon their responsibilities to protect the public based on unenforceable promises from companies eager to cut costs for maintenance and emergency preparedness. This should be a wake-up call for the 37 states that have eliminated traditional oversight of telecommunications services and those states considering similar deregulation: critical communications services cannot be left without some kind of public oversight."

16 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. Cell Phones More Important by neonv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have to say, restoring cell service is probably more important than copper service. Hardly anyone has landlines. Notice how they hardly mention that it is copper wires they are talking about ...

    1. Re:Cell Phones More Important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lots of people have landlines. Landlines are all over the US, because in the past under the AT&T monopoly, they were forced by regulation to wire up damn near every place in the country that could physically be wired up. In some of those places, they can't get much cell service due to geography, and landlines are really rather necessary.

      Current local telephony companies want to get rid of landlines, because maintaining all those copper lines is expensive (and many of the workers with experience doing that work are unionized). They'd rather just put in cells, or at least put in fiber. But what they really want to do is drop customers completely in places where doing either might not be profitable, even though they're still supposed to be bound by universal service requirements.

      Communication networks need to be run as utilities, at least the physical part itself, not by for-profit companies worried more about padding the CEOs pocket next quarter than about providing service to every place in the country.

    2. Re:Cell Phones More Important by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This summary reads like a lobbyist wrote it. In Florida they can't even get the cell towers going because the backbone took such a hit - that would be the case with or without copper regulations. The copper rules would affect consumers during the rebuilding phase, not in the immediate aftermath. This is the kind of hyperbolic bullshit that has replaced actual discussion in this country.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Cell Phones More Important by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Problem is that they're allowing telcos to drop ALL fixed-line (copper OR fiber) service in certain locations. And wireless is only a good alternative if you like random slowdowns, high latency, and generally shit service.

    4. Re:Cell Phones More Important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The POTS system actually works in most disasters, unlike the cell networks that quickly get over loaded. The reason why is that the POTS network provides it's own power over different network layout than the power lines if you have a traditional phone instead of a computerized wireless model, which I always kept one hooked up in case of emergency. The cell networks can get flooded with too many calls and the fiber lines fail the instant the batteries go dead. I have been through situations where the cell networks failed and Ive been in situations where the power lines where out yet I could still make a phone call over hard line.

    5. Re: Cell Phones More Important by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, you should.

      It's more efficient and infinitely cheaper if we support one another than if we live in isolated caves. The Internet wasn't created by a person or a company but through subsidy and cooperation. And thus all projects worth having are born.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re: Cell Phones More Important by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are no "free phones", somebody pays in the end.

      There are cost-effective phones, ones whose benefit exceeds the cost and thus have long-term negative cost.

      A land line can last a hundred years without needing replacing, if it's built right.

      A cell phone tower is unlikely to survive the next storm, no matter how well you built it.

      That's a lot of cell phone towers you have to rebuild to be equal to one land line.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    7. Re: Cell Phones More Important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      "A land line can last a hundred years without needing replacing, if it's built right."

      Unfortunately you still nail them to wooden posts, like a century ago when phone and electricity was introduced.
      It was supposed to be temporary.

  2. Re:Ajit Pai Killed... by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some sentences should end early to be good.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. so what do these rules have to do with.... by arbiter1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So what do these rules have to do with VERIZON not working to repair their network after a weather event? Isn't it in their own self interest to get there as quick as possible to repair their cell towers to get service BACK to their paying customers instead of gov forcing them to do it? All this sounds to me is Liberals trying to push an agenda that doesn't even make 1 lick of sense.

    1. Re:so what do these rules have to do with.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because emergency communications are critical to human safety. They received subsidies to put these lines in place with the explicit understanding that they would maintain them, even during emergencies and natural disasters. Our taxes went to assist them in building this. Are you that dense that you can't recognize that?

      This isn't about commercial profit. This is about human safety.

    2. Re:so what do these rules have to do with.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Isn't it in their own self interest to get there as quick as possible

      No, it's not. They save a bundle by waiting until weather conditions are more favorable. And, they do not have enough competition to fear losing most of their paying customers.

  4. Re:The Republican Death Cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Defunding Planned Parenthood kills women, babies and children.

    You DO realize what Planned Parenthood does, don't you, when you talk about "killing babies and children"?

  5. Re:Smudge Much? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they can bring electricity and water to homes on Fire Island, they can bring fiber. This isn't an engineering issue, this is a Verizon-being-fuckheads issue.

  6. Rarely, if ever by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Should the market drive the response. The corporations have defined the market, not the consumer. The theory of market-driven response is predicated on consumers having a choice.

    Where you have de-facto local monopolies or duopolies due to arrangements between telecos, the consumer has no choice. Likewise when information is so limited that choice does not exist.

    Does anyone seriously believe most of those affected had a free choice from a diverse market, with full information on choices? If they do, they need to take a serious look at what they consider diverse or information.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  7. Re: The Republican Death Cult by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The dynamics are a bit more complex, but the poster was not lying.

    Access to abortion actually does reduce abortion rates. It also increases the safety of them.

    Abortion rates have gone up dramatically in States that have reduced access to nearly zero. One can argue that that's because contraception access is also nearly zero, as is sex education. That's fair. However, the three are linked. The attitudes restricting one restrict them all.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)