Slashdot Mirror
Popular Mechanics Defends Elon Musk -- While He Tweets About Fortnite (popularmechanics.com)
The November issue of Popular Mechanics includes a message from its editors that Elon Musk is "under attack," arguing that while some criticisms have merit, "much of it is myopic and small-brained, from sideline observers gleefully salivating at the opportunity to take him down a peg."
But what have these stock analysts and pontificators done for humanity? Elon Musk is an engineer at heart, a tinkerer, a problem-solver -- the kind of person Popular Mechanics has always championed -- and the problems he's trying to solve are hard. Really hard. He could find better ways to spend his money, that's for sure. And yet there he is, trying to build gasless cars and build reusable rockets and build tunnels that make traffic go away. For all his faults and unpredictability, we need him out there doing that. We need people who have ideas. We need people who take risks.
We need people who try.
The magazine includes statements from 12 high-profile supporters, including investor Mark Cuban, who writes "When you invest in a company run by an entrepreneur like Elon, you are investing in the mindset and approach that an entrepreneur brings to the table as much as you are valuing the net present value of future cash flows. That is not typical for public companies that are overwhelmingly run by hired CEOs. My advice for Elon is simple: Be yourself. Be true to your mission. Respect your investors. Ignore your critics."
Meanwhile, in a Friday post on Twitter, Musk jokingly claimed that he'd purchased and then deleted the game of Fortnite, posting a doctored Marketwatch article quoting him as saying "I had to save these kids from eternal virginity."
"Had to been done," tweeted Musk, adding "ur welcome".
We need people who try.
The magazine includes statements from 12 high-profile supporters, including investor Mark Cuban, who writes "When you invest in a company run by an entrepreneur like Elon, you are investing in the mindset and approach that an entrepreneur brings to the table as much as you are valuing the net present value of future cash flows. That is not typical for public companies that are overwhelmingly run by hired CEOs. My advice for Elon is simple: Be yourself. Be true to your mission. Respect your investors. Ignore your critics."
Meanwhile, in a Friday post on Twitter, Musk jokingly claimed that he'd purchased and then deleted the game of Fortnite, posting a doctored Marketwatch article quoting him as saying "I had to save these kids from eternal virginity."
"Had to been done," tweeted Musk, adding "ur welcome".
I feel exactly that way about Elon Musk. I don't care about his defects shown so far. They are absolutely expected. I'd buy his company stock in small amounts just to stand where I speak. And if any goes bankrupt, I'd gladly share the weight of what I put. But to try to make him step down, feels like s*****d Apple when they fired Jobs for a "stable proven guy"...nothing got invented. Actually, Apple is still riding Jobs' waves and has done very little if nothing to invent anything that will change how we live or work, otehr than what was already started.
unfinished: (adj.)
And stock analysis are supposed to be reliable and infallible.
But reality has switched things around. And I end up with mutual funds managed by idiots, and there are people who invent big things who are criticized for perceived mistakes that have not even occurred.
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man."
- George Bernard Shaw
So what exactly did he buy?
I feel like this guy jumps on any bandwagon he sees as popular and then tries to capitalize as much as possible from it.
He seems to be getting there. SpaceX is doing reasonably well, arguably on government money but coming from government contracts rather than subsidies, and offering a real value: Uncle Sam is saving money on those contracts. As for EV's... I don't think that market - meaning all auto makers, not just Tesla - would be where it is today if it wasn't for those tax breaks. Perhaps tax breaks are necessary to kick-start certain markets... I'm all for that, as long as those subsidies are doled out equally, and end at some point.
Here's hoping that Tesla can get over the financial hump, they've pulled out all the stops to meet important targets, but next 2 quarters are going to be make or break, and Musk will have to show that they can not only reach the current production (and distribution) levels, but sustain them as well, while turning to a positive cash flow.
If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
He failed to deliver on his promises. True. The goal was so over the top, what he did deliver is way above other car companies delivered.
He showed what a no compromise electric car can do, how it will drive, how it would feel and how great it would be. That genie is out of the bottle. No body can put it back in. No ICEV can compete with a EV.
And the party is just starting. The batteries are getting cheaper, energy density is getting higher. While ICE is fully optimized and there is nothing more you could squeeze out of an internal combustion engine.
In an EV, you can have two or four motors mechanically decoupled and electronically controlled. What such a car can do, no way an ICE can do.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
All my normie roommates who play fortnite incessantly fuck a lot.
I, for one, think that it is ABSOLUTELY NO SURPRISE some people keep trying hard to discredit & take down Musk/Tesla!
I, for one, can clearly see that, everytime a Tesla car taken apart (for reverse engineering?), what found is innovation after innovation!
Tesla cars keep getting highest safety ratings ever & W/O CHEATING!!!
Why others count as cheating, at least to me, is because all gasoline cars are always tested for safety w/ EMPTY GAS TANK!
Is that really a realistic test? Traffic accidents in the real world ever happen w/ empty gas tanks?
& what do you think would happen to the safety ratings of all gasoline cars, if they were collision tested w/ full gas tanks?
Don't you think that, quite a significant percentage of people who die in traffic accidents, are actually not dying from the collision,
but really dying afterwards, by BURNING TO DEATH ALIVE!!!
Why do you think, public never knows/hears about, what percentage of people burning to death alive, in all traffic accidents w/ deaths?
Do you seriously think gasoline car companies would want public to learn that?
(Realize that, a big percentage of advertising revenue of all mass media outlets are always coming from car companies!)
Now many gasoline car companies are keep pushing hard for hydrogen cars, instead of electric.
Why do you think that is?
Could it be because, switching gasoline car factories to produce hydrogen cars would be a lot cheaper,
compared to switching to produce electric cars?
(Realize that, technologically, the difference between, a gasoline car and hydrogen car, is a lot smaller than, the difference between a gasoline car and electric car!)
But the problem is, if, gasoline cars, replaced by hydrogen cars,
then we would be actually replacing extreme fire hazards (during collisions) w/ MOVING BOMBS, quite literally!
(But of course, that is not really a problem for the car companies themselves; that is a problem for the public, right?)
(And also think about, how much danger to the public would be, if whole world covered w/ hydrogen transport/storage infrastructure?!)
So again, it is ABSOLUTELY NO SURPRISE (at least to me), some people keep trying hard to discredit & take down Musk/Tesla!!!
One thing I've noticed is that many Elon Musk haters are "losers." I don't mean the popular/insulting version of the word, but rather the basic noun - loser, one who loses.
I've had quite a few debates with haters, and all of the ones I spoke to had some sad story about stock shorts that didn't work out, relatives that lost their jobs on the oil rigs, or friends who owned automotive garages. No amount of "times change" really helped.
I honestly kinda feel sorry for people that really, really want the world to stop turning. :(
A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
Cell phones, laptops, Tesla are operating where you cant design for today's metrics. You need to predict the processor speed 18 months from now and design the phone. You need to anticipate the bandwidth increase expected in 12 months.
An EV's most critical metrics are energy density Kg/kWh of the battery and price $/kWh of the battery. Elon, in his famour 2006 "secret" master plan calculated a 7 year half life for these two critical metrics. The energy density will double, and the price wil halve every seven years. Sort of like Moore's law of batteries. Tesla is designing, building and pricing the cars based on that model. In 2012 for the Tesla Roadster, the battery cost was 270 $/kWh. Model 3, battery is 130 $/kWh (Tesla's claim) 140$/kWh Monroe's tear down. It is following the expected path. Tesla says it is going to hit 100 $/kWh sometime in 2019. That is the figure when the EV and ICEV will cost the same off the dealer's lot. Battery + motor cost = engine+transmission+emission control+fuel tank cost.
The legacy car makers are not used to engine manufacturing cost going down by 50% in 7 years. Nor the weight of the power train falling by 50% between drawing board and production.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
Yeah but he did start SpaceX. Also to a large degree what you see in the Model S or X was because of his guidance. Both the good and the bad.
So you think tax breaks should be offered by the government, but that nobody should take them?
Boeing called, they want to give the SLS money back.
Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
He just tries really hard. :)
[($)]
I don't believe you. I bought Tesla stock a couple years ago, and made a bunch. It'd be difficult not to. If you're interested in transitioning to EV's, power grid changes, and/or American manufacturing, then you would understand that there is very good reason for grants. Grants are earned by doing important things - and if he pursued them, then the incentives did there job (but that wasn't the point to him - since if you'd even just read his biography, you'd know he was already talking about the importance of electric vehicles while doing his physics undergrad in Canada). SpaceX's money comes largely from contracts to do jobs that are needed - just business.. and they do it far more cheaply than the competition. Your position strains credulity.
Talented creative assholes are still assholes.
The main problem he has with Tesla is that it's selling products to the public, so when he tweets something a lot of people take it as a promise or at least a reasonably reliable statement. Then when Tesla doesn't deliver for years they get upset.
Most companies have a PR department for that reason, and don't let the CEO tweet. Well, at least now Musk will have to have his tweets vetted so maybe it will get better.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
On the contrary, I expect most people with those kinds of resources available to them to be insufferable giant bags of douche, mostly because it just doesn't matter on any significant level to them. At the end of the day he has the ability to live life in a level of luxury unlike just about anybody else, and calling someone a "pedo guy" on Twatter won't change that in the slightest.
Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
I'm starting to think these posts come from some shifty AI that just can't grasp language, and needs an adjustment to it's learning algorithm.
This is just words that do not add up to anything but nonsense.
Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.