Slashdot Mirror


China Requires Blockchain-Based Information Service Providers To Register Users Using Real Names, Censor Postings and Store User Data (scmp.com)

Chinese users will have to register their real names before they can use online information services based on blockchain, in the first set of rules specifically targeting the technology behind digital currencies like bitcoin that is known for providing anonymity for users. From a report: Under proposed new rules, companies and entities operating in China that provide blockchain-based information services will have to ask users to register their real names and national identification card numbers, censor content deemed to pose a threat to national security and store user data to allow inspection by authorities. The Cyberspace Administration of China published the draft regulations on its website on Friday for public consultation until November 2. It is not clear when the rules will come into effect. The latest rules come after an activist in China published an open letter in April about an alleged cover-up of sexual harassment at a top university more than two decades ago on the ethereum blockchain, after the post attracted censors on social media platforms such as WeChat and Weibo. The anonymous poster attached the letter to an ether transaction to himself, in a move similar to leaving a note in a bank transfer. But since all transaction records are public on ethereum, the letter can be read by anyone.

56 comments

  1. Fuck China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    They are a human rights disaster.

    1. Re:Fuck China by jellomizer · · Score: 0

      They are, but that means we in the America or Europe should judge ourselves against them. Just so we can ignore our own Human Rights issues.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Fuck China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China just gave you a STD. LOL!!!

    3. Re:Fuck China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which ones? Do share.

    4. Re: Fuck China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. They are facist piggies like Vlad Rasputin and his Agent Orange. But if China says blockchain is BS then I am in agreement. It is major BS.

    5. Re:Fuck China by jellomizer · · Score: 0

      We have migrants seeking asylum to America and Europe who are being turned away, threatened, Locked up...
      General Race relations still sucks, and governments find coded laws to keep the disadvantage down.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:Fuck China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look what them plantation owners did to stifle their growth. Their high levels of criminal behavior are also explained by biased policing, whereby the white person's behavior is excused more frequently compared to a black person's.

    7. Re:Fuck China by balbeir · · Score: 1
      Yeah it's the end of the road.

      I think we have witnessed peak China.

    8. Re:Fuck China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look what them plantation owners did to stifle their growth. Their high levels of criminal behavior are also explained by biased policing, whereby the white person's behavior is excused more frequently compared to a black person's.

      So how is it that most murders in the US are black males murdering other black males? How is it that black men refuse to father their black children more than any other race?

      How is it that you see the same criminal violence in black-run black-majority areaas of the world (that is, ALL OF THEM)?

      Your belief is an article of faith.

    9. Re: Fuck China by CGordy · · Score: 1

      Using that logic, America should straight away cede sovereignty to the Japanese.

    10. Re: Fuck China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Refugees seek asylum, typically from abusive or failed states. Migrants seek a new home, or work, or something else. Iâ(TM)ll be real, if I was in their position I might do the same. However, I donâ(TM)t see it as our responsibility to open the gates to a bunch of barbarians who evidently donâ(TM)t shy from violence, and crap up wherever they go as a matter of routine. It would set precedent that anyone who comes to knock at the door is welcome in, which would be more disastrous long run.
      Either we recognize their homelands as failed states, and get the world to chip in to help fix it, or we tell them to fuck off back home.

    11. Re: Fuck China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using that logic, America should straight away cede sovereignty to the Japanese.

      Remove the blacks and their black crime rate goes with them. America would then be quite competitive in terms of crime.

    12. Re: Fuck China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using that logic, America should straight away cede sovereignty to the Japanese.

      Remove the blacks and their black crime rate goes with them. America would then be quite competitive in terms of crime.

      The amazing thing is - black crime rates, drug use, family dysfunction (fatherless children, domestic abuse etc) actually GOT WORSE since Civil Rights and the end of segregation and Jim Crow.

      Blacks score poorly on average IQ, impulse control and measuremetns of future-time orientation. The reason there were Jim Crow laws was the belief that blacks cannot function properly in a modern Western society so their behavior had to be closely and strictly regulated. If that belief is false then they should have improved once such laws were repealed. That has not been the case at all.

      W.E.B. du Bois himself wrote about the abysmal "unchaste" nature of blacks and how their inability to maintain a healthy family structure (stable two-parent home) has harmed them. He also wrote "that the first and greatest step toward the settlement of the present friction between the races lies in the correction of the immorality, crime and laziness among Negroes. ".

      In 1899 du Bois wrote "The number of deserted wives, however, allowing for false reports, is astoundingly large and presents many intricate problems. A very large part of charity given to Negroes is asked for this reason. The causes of desertion are partly laxity in morals and partly the difficulty of supporting a family. The result of this large number of homes without husbands is to increase the burden of charity and benevolence, and also on account of their poor home life to increase crime. Here is a wide field for social regeneration." He continued: "There can be no doubt but what sexual looseness is to-day the prevailing sin of the mass of the Negro population, and that its prevalence can be traced to bad home life in most cases. Children are allowed on the street night and day unattended; loose talk is often indulged in; the sin is seldom if ever denounced in the churches. Unhappily, the fountain is tainted at the source. The great body of the race have scarcely any notion of the foundation principles of pure family life. They appear not only to have no idea of morality, but to lack any instinct upon which such an idea can be founded."

      I could go on and on with other black observers but the point is, only recently is it taboo to be honest.

    13. Re:Fuck China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is too small to fit it in.

  2. Communist Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Communist Government requires totalitarian control. Why are Chinese headlines like these meant to be shocking?

    1. Re:Communist Government by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The economic system is not related to to how totalitarian the government is.
      A Capitalist system can be just as Totalitarian as a Communist one is. Also a Communist government could also be a nice place to live and work.

      Now Communism has a problem where any person who doesn't play by the plan can hurt the system. While Capitalism expected no plan, so anyone who does better then nothing, is a net benefit. This creates a tenancy for communism to be more brutal in people following rules.
      But Capitalism is often more insidious where the people who have money have the power, however they use their power behind the scenes, and are not the face of power.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Communist Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Communism doesn't require a totalitarian government, true, but to say they aren't related is not. When you centralize all power, government and economic, when mixed with human nature, it tends towards this. There's a reason all communist governments have had quite a severe totalitarian streak to them. Absolute power corrupts absolutely and such.

    3. Re:Communist Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Capitalism can't thrive under any totalitarianism; be it communism, or fascism (two sides of the same coin called 'tyranny').

      What we have in the US is called crony-capitalism, AKA corruption. That's a result of the electorate not being actively involved in the democratic process. You can't just set the Gov to "auto pilot" and not expect it to breakdown and become the monster that it is today.

      The government you get is the government you deserve.

    4. Re:Communist Government by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The economic system is not related to to how totalitarian the government is.

      Yes it is. If the economic system prohibits the free exchange of goods and services, then you need an oppressive government to enforce the ban.

      A Capitalist system can be just as Totalitarian as a Communist one is.

      Of course. Franco's Spain and Pinochet's Chile were capitalist and totalitarian.

      Also a Communist government could also be a nice place to live and work.

      Bullcrap.

    5. Re: Communist Government by TimMD909 · · Score: 2

      "Also a Communist government could also be a nice place to live and work." - oh, really? Give one real world example where that's true for anyone not at the top. I'll wait.

    6. Re: Communist Government by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

      Compare the kinda sorta communist Cuba to the capitalist Haiti. Which of the two has the higher standards of living?

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    7. Re:Communist Government by Zorro · · Score: 1

      Suggests they move to China and find out instead of posting to the internet.

      It is certain I can say TIANIMEN SQUARE here. China not so much.

    8. Re:Communist Government by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      It is certain I can say TIANIMEN SQUARE here.

      You can say it. But can you spell it?

      It is: Tian (heaven/sky) An (peace) Men (gate). Tiananmen, the gate of heavenly peace.

    9. Re: Communist Government by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Okay, if you insist turning this into a matter of skin colour, let's take another example
      A capitalist cleptocratic democracy Ukraine vs a communism nostalgia dictatorship Belarus. Same white skin colour, a very similar language, the two countries have the same status of being former soviet republics. Yet Belarus has over twice the GDP per capita, despite Ukraine having far more natural resources and being a capitalist democracy. Apparently being corrupt sucks far more than being a dictatorship.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  3. Identity theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think innocent people will be caught in the crossfire.

  4. Isn't the purpose of blockchain ... by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 2

    ... to make it impossible to remove or hide transactions? It would seem that this would outlaw the use of blockchain in China.

    1. Re:Isn't the purpose of blockchain ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since every transaction is recorded, none can be hidden. Since every new transaction is added to the ledger, no transactions are removed. This is the perfect system for a totalitarian state, so long as you control the nodes that determine the truth, and the first transaction is you announcing yourself.

    2. Re:Isn't the purpose of blockchain ... by sacrilicious · · Score: 2

      ... to make it impossible to remove or hide transactions? It would seem that this would outlaw the use of blockchain in China.

      This doesn't per se outlaw blockchain in China. True, China could not remove things from blockchains, BUT if China knows who put any given thing on a blockchain and is willing to torture/disappear them, blockchains don't have to be illegal to be acceptable to the Chinese authorities.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    3. Re:Isn't the purpose of blockchain ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A. the immutable history can be just the metadata not the datadata
      B. if enough nodes agree, they can mutate the history

    4. Re:Isn't the purpose of blockchain ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...so long as you control the nodes that determine the truth, and the first transaction is you announcing yourself.

      It's a good thing PRC is investing significant infrastructure in block chain. Don't they have the largest set of computers working the ledge?

  5. Re: What has anonymity gotten us? by TimMD909 · · Score: 2

    Are you troll, or foolish? Whistle-blowers generally anger those in charge who'd like to keep their shady dealings in the dark. If you can report it anonymously, then the whistle-blower's life doesn't have to be ruined. Ask Edward Snowden if you have any questions. There's one example among many.

  6. Economic systems don't equal nice government by sjbe · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now Communism has a problem where any person who doesn't play by the plan can hurt the system. While Capitalism expected no plan, so anyone who does better then nothing, is a net benefit.

    Nonsense. It's perfectly possible for someone under a capitalist system to be a drag on the system while making a lot of economic activity. Happens all the time. See the housing crisis in 2008 which was caused by a lot of people acting in their own self interest but eventually crashing the system. Explain to me how Bernie Madoff was a net benefit - I'd love to hear that one...

    This creates a tenancy for communism to be more brutal in people following rules.

    You mean as opposed to mass incarceration of people for minor offenses, prison camps for Japanese during WWII, Guantanamo Bay, routine murder of minorities by police, near genocide of native peoples, Jim Crow laws, etc - all of which happened in our capitalist society, some rather recently. While I understand and agree that what we call communist countries are generally more towards the dictator end of the spectrum, let's not pretend that capitalist countries have clean hands either. The US has a greater percentage of its population in prison than China does so it's pretty hard to argue that the US isn't rather brutal too - particularly to those without much money.

    But Capitalism is often more insidious where the people who have money have the power, however they use their power behind the scenes, and are not the face of power.

    That happens in both communist and capitalist societies as well as every other form of economic structure you can think of. That is not unique to capitalism.

    1. Re: Economic systems don't equal nice government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bernie Madoff was a net benefit because he almost exclusively victimized fellow liberals and leftists organizations and trusts.

    2. Re:Economic systems don't equal nice government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has a greater percentage of its population in prison than China does so it's pretty hard to argue that the US isn't rather brutal too

      Yes but China has no black population to speak of which gives them a HUGE advantage on that metric. Even when you account for socio-economic status blacks (esp black males) are the single most violent demographic in America by a large margin.

  7. Re: What has anonymity gotten us? by Puls4r · · Score: 0

    I guess asking an honest question here is "trolling" or "foolish" and gets modded down. My mistake. We all have avenues of doing things anonymously. You can drop a package at your local newspaper if you like. Spoof your phone number and call a reporter. There are certainly ways to whistleblow that maintain your anonymity, including many 1-800 numbers that are set up for exactly that purpose.

    In fact, I mentioned essentially that in the original post. I included political speech and freedom from tyranny. But don't let you stop that from calling names then basically repeating what I already said.

  8. Re:What has anonymity gotten us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There have been several scandals brought to light thanks to an anonymous whistleblower, ranging from Watergate (Deep Throat) to the recent Panama Papers.

  9. Re:What has anonymity gotten us? by Hentes · · Score: 2

    The solution is not less anonymity, but more: if your credit card details are kept secure thiefs can't steal from you, and if you could hide your IP cheaters couldn't DDoS you.

  10. Still China; Still Nazis by nagora · · Score: 1

    Just don't deal with Nazi China. Suffocate the Party; wipe out its interests overseas. Do not sell its goods; do not sell them goods.

    Just because the leader doesn't have a little moustache doesn't mean he's a nice guy.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  11. Re: What has anonymity gotten us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude is obviously a troll and a shitty one at that:

    >Spoof your phone number and call a reporter.

    but in his original post he says

    >It's easy to see the negatives - right down to all those fantastic robocalls that we get with spoofed area codes and exchange numbers.

  12. c6gunner's impersonating me & lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: c6gunner's name on this post as submitter yet signed "APK" https://linux.slashdot.org/com...

    * I'm right there every time you pull your crap so give up already - as usual, you FAIL & are EXPOSED in it, loser.

    APK

    P.S.=> You say hosts = shit https://slashdot.org/comments.... ?

    FACTS: /.ers & security pros + RESULTS say DIFFERENT:

    1st: /.ers https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments.... https://slashdot.org/comments....

    2nd: SECURITY PROS https://slashdot.org/comments....

    3rd: REAL RESULTS w/ hosts vs. threats https://slashdot.org/comments....

    EAT YOUR WORDS

  13. Re:c6gunner's impersonating me & lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit for brains APK, someone was posting about your crypto-moose-coin long before c6gunner made fun of you. You have blamed that post on several people now, so who is it?

  14. Re:c6gunner's impersonating me & lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anyone on slashdot's shit for brains it's you. You stalk apk by unidentifiable anonymous because he thrashes you so you hide. Your butthurt shows.

  15. Re:What has anonymity gotten us? by pak9rabid · · Score: 2

    I was thinking about it earlier today and it occurred to me: what innovations on the internet have been furthered by anonymity? I can think of a huge number of bad-actors that are supported by it, from Credit Card thieves to hackers and even video game cheaters.

    Well, for starters nobody will be banging on your door to beat your ass for this comment.

  16. A question of national security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The age-old cry of the oppressor."

    - a man far wiser than any of us on here

  17. Re: You Hate Blah People. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We get it. Nobody but your fellow racist losers read your garbage and no one cares what you think. You're garbage.

  18. Re: Blah blah blah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haiti is a shithole. Cuba is a shithole with universal healthcare and higher standards of living. Suck it up princess.

  19. Re: You Hate Blah People. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We get it. Nobody but your fellow racist losers read your garbage and no one cares what you think. You're garbage.

    So ... nothing of substance to offer, then?

    Or ... what majority-black city or country would you like to live in?

    The funny thing is, when blacks move in to YOUR neighborhood in numbers you will be among the first to engage in "white flight". Of course you will say it's because of the crime.

  20. Re: Blah blah blah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haiti is a shithole. Cuba is a shithole with universal healthcare and higher standards of living. Suck it up princess.

    Cuba is a *drastically better* place to live than Haiti. Do the research yourself.

    This is just one piece of a very big picture to get you started. Highlights:

    "Please note that U.S. Embassy staff may only visit downtown Port-au-Prince in armored vehicles and must observe a midnight-to-5 a.m. curfew. "

    "Travel by road is difficult and dangerous in Haiti. The situation on the roads can be described as chaotic. Drivers in Haiti must use extreme caution. Poor road conditions and the absence of traffic rules lead to unpredictable and dangerous driving behavior."

    Haiti has no sanitation or public health to speak of. What the previous page doesn't delve into is the long list of vaccinations you need to receive (4-6 weeks) before setting foot on Haitian soil.

    That's just the beginning. Really you have no idea how bad it is in Haiti or any other black-goverened nation. They simply cannot effectively manage anything larger than a clan or tribe.

  21. What if I transact on Chinese blockchain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...from outside China and attach controversial text? I doubt the Party HQ in Peking is going to abduct me Jack Bauer style.