Slashdot Mirror
Google Is Teaching Children How To Act Online. Is It the Best Role Model? (nytimes.com)
Google is positioning itself in schools as a trusted authority on digital citizenship at a moment when the company's data-handling practices are under growing scrutiny. From a report: Google is on a mission to teach children how to be safe online. That is the message behind "Be Internet Awesome," a so-called digital-citizenship education program that the technology giant developed for schools. The lessons include a cartoon game branded with Google's logo and blue, red, yellow and green color palette. The game is meant to help students from third grade through sixth guard against schemers, hackers and other bad actors. Google plans to reach five million schoolchildren with the program this year and has teamed up with the National Parent Teacher Association to offer related workshops to parents. But critics say the company's recent woes -- including revelations that it was developing a censored version of its search engine for the Chinese market and had tracked the whereabouts of users who had explicitly turned off their location history -- should disqualify Google from promoting itself in schools as a model of proper digital conduct.
Too late...
Google motto 2004: Don’t be evil
Google motto 2010: Evil is tricky to define
Google motto 2013: We make military robots... also, we help Hillary overthrow governments and help the Chinese oppress their people
Google motto 2017: Trump is evil
Google motto 2018: We do not care what you think, we are Evil, deal with it.
5 out of 6 people enjoy Russian Roulette & 6 out of 7 Dwarfs are not Happy
The corporation shall educate your child accordingly
Listen - I won't argue that Google hasn't left behind something important with its "Don't be evil" philosophy.
But compared to 'adult' power morality in our nation, Google is still relatively saintly.
Our latest answer to violence is crueler violence - our adults are failing the most basic tests of civilization just to see their opponents squirm and laugh at it.
I think the kids are the sanest folks left, given the studies I've seen on how they're handling all this - and Google is one of the least horrible influences.
Trust Google.
Google is there to keep you safe.
Use Google Products.
Give All your Data To Google.
Google Will Keep It Safe.
Sincerely,
Google for Kids
Angry google bro editor needs to get his quota in to pay for his shorted stock on Tesla
Except at the current, neither is,otherwise you wouldn't have the likes of 4chan and reddit, where you say one thing and you called a cuck and doxed.
Finally someone snaps does real harm or causes harm to themselves. Thoughts and prayers abound and suicide prevention hotlines are posted, when it wouldn't be needed if people were just nicer to one another online and in real life.
I hate fat people.
Other non google versions exist. I know that the Boy Scouts has a program for this through a partnership with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. It is also requirement at least at that cub scout level. I also know that my kids public school district uses the Scouts's program in their elementary school as it is available for anyone to use.
Time to offend someone
Because your children need to be taught our way, because we said so.
Corporations are not the best role models at all. Period. They do underhanded and devious things all of the time so the last entity that I want teaching my child about morals is a fucking corporation.
Unless you want your child to grow into a greedy fuckhead that has no respect for other people.
http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
You _can_ use better passwords, you _can_ be more careful with your social graph, these things are relatively simple to get right enough for most people. They are mostly geared towards protecting you from third-party activity which has not taken control of the infrastructure of the products you are using.
Yes, you could teach sixth graders about changing settings and using DuckDuckGo, but realistically the problem isn't the search engine or browser you use, it's the products you use. Yes, using Google for a search engine could expose various things to Google - but it's all the sites you go to that are strip-mining your information and selling it to each other, they don't need Google to do that. If you're using Facebook, then switching from Google to DuckDuckGo isn't helping you much. Likewise if you're using Amazon or YouTube or any other site. You're up against adversaries who control the horizontal and the vertical, there's not a lot you can do which isn't comparable to using crystals or magnets to address your arthritis. Hell, millions of people install malware-protection programs which turn out to be actual malware! THEY PAY FOR IT! We simply aren't equipped to effectively deal with this scale of issue at an individual level.
I think Google has good incentives to help teach you, the individual end-user, to avoid scams perpetrated by other individual end users (nigerian prince, identity theft), and also against organized and opportunistic data-collectors (black market trading in password databases types of things). And those are issues you actually can improve based on your actions. But protecting yourself from having Google or MasterCard or Target "steal" your privacy is a tough problem, individuals can only really solve it by opting out, or supporting regulatory changes.
American parents. I don't really see a better alternative. Google has its wrongs, but I do not really see too many, if any institutions which have any more moral perspectives than Google.
Right. Now Yemeni or Venezuelan parents, they're the shizzle.
It's always those dang Americans ...
This is nothing but a good example of classic Ad Hominem logical fallacy/attack!!!
The real issue to consider is this: Is the training content provided by Google is right or wrong?
Tell us about that!!!
The real issue is NOT whether Google itself is a good role model or not!!!
If you can't be bothered to spend enough time raising your own children, then do not have them in the first place. You should not be allowing the TV, the Internet, Google, or anyone other than yourselves, and maybe close relatives, to raise your children.
I guess you're not from the United States, then? If you're not then fuck the fuck off, wherever you're from isn't any better than here and you goddamned well know it.
But trust us with it.
Right, it's not like Big (anything) is any better. Do people think Disney is wearing a halo? Google is probably in an ideal position to design this curriculum from.
I certainly understand being wary of the fuckers (re: Big Firewall, military AI, etc), but then how about stripping away the branding and sponsorship and Brought To You By.
Though, I doubt google's slideshows and flash games will actually give a comprehensive internet-guard upbringing. That would include wisdom like general practices against centralization, tracking, IoT - subjects where google prefers you to be complacent, gardenwalled, spoonfed, and in particular, dependent.
in 2018 the only reasonable answer when asked to "think of the children" is an extreme. So either the kids learn to cough up their personal data with Google, or they lean about the gay frog chemicals from the blog of Alex Jones.
Good people go to bed earlier.
It's not Yemeni parents enabling Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and Apple.
You want them to learn how to post drama-filled posts of hate, ignorance and indecipherable grammar, while driving 50mph in the fast lane?
Google can just send kids to /. as a fine example as to how not to act.
You can't be 'Internet Awesome', Google tells children on their 'Certificates of Internet Awesomeness', unless 'You know how to tell the difference between the real and the fake.' By that standard, Google itself is not 'Internet Awesome.' From Tuesday's Google Online Security Blog post: "Last week, BuzzFeed News provided us with information that helped us identify new aspects of an ad fraud operation across apps and websites that were monetizing with numerous ad platforms, including Google. While our internal systems had previously caught and blocked violating websites from our ad network, in the past week we also removed apps involved in the ad fraud scheme so they can no longer monetize with Google. Further, we have blacklisted additional apps and websites that are outside of our ad network, to ensure that advertisers using Display & Video 360 (formerly known as DoubleClick Bid Manager) do not buy any of this traffic. We are continuing to monitor this operation and will continue to take action if we find any additional invalid traffic. While our analysis of the operation is ongoing, we estimate that the dollar value of impacted Google advertiser spend across the apps and websites involved in the operation is under $10 million."
"Give me the child for his first seven years, and Iâ(TM)ll give you the man" was a memorable Jesuit quote from the book The God Delusion.
Are parents stepping up to handle this? Schools? Local governments? If not Google, or some other corporation, who else is attempting to fill this role? Google may objectively be the worst possible choice for this particular role, but they also seem to be the only choice.
While people can complain about how corporations may act behind the scenes, there is a huge problem right now with people who fall for what most of us might consider an obvious scam. Phishing attacks, phone calls "from Microsoft", and "Your computer is sending out viruses, let us come in and we will fix it for you" type things are becoming increasingly common. If Google is going to do a good thing and teach kids not to fall for these types of scams, is that REALLY a bad thing? We are not talking about classes talking about corporate ethics, we are talking about some pretty straight forward stuff that kids SHOULD be taught from an early age.
How do you control a large group of the population. Get into their heads at a early age.
"Don't be google would be the moto" :)
Or maybe we should just make the 1st november the official "Don't be google" as a reminder to all companies to don't give up on thier higher standards.
Left parents just are screaming for censorship. Right parents lack even the most basic ability to judge the credibility of sources. Generic corporate overlord Google is a much better adult guide than either of those two groups.
WOW. Such freedumbs. Very America. BIGLY fucked by corporations.
Children: here is how you sell illegal campaign ads to the Russians to influence the US elections...
get into education?
To spread its own domestic party political politics? For the ads?
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
Considering how badly some parents handle their kids (or in some cases not at all) then Google might actually do a better job there. Google's already everywhere on the Internet almost. The only way to avoid Google is to go to their competitors which are probably doing the exact same things or worse. It's in Google's best interests to ensure our kids have a good experience from the Internet and not a tragic or bad one.
Does it teach kids how to log off their Android phone?
Your phone still works, with a few awkward workarounds*, if you log out of your Google account and keep using it.
(*some are really awkward, actually. If you log out of your phone, your 'contacts' disappear. The workaround is to export your Contacts to a vcard file and then read that Vcard file back into your 'contacts list' after you've logged out of Google.)
Kids can also learn how to make sure they are logged out of Google on their browser. And how to have multiple browsers, including only one that their Google account is logged into.
It isn't perfect and Google still has ways of planting 'bugs' to trace you, but these are the sorts of things children need to learn.
They're in the best position for telling kids how to behave so Google knows exactly how best to track them.
Next question?