Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Reports Third-Quarter Profit That Beats Market Expectations (cnbc.com)

Rei writes: When Tesla announced late last year that it was targeting sustained profitability in the second half of 2018, reaffirming this target throughout the year, the markets reacted with skepticism. Indeed, despite repeated insistence that the company had no need for a capital round, news analysts have treated the concept of Tesla dilution to raise more capital as inevitable and urgent to pay off convertible bonds next spring, even suggesting insidious theories that the reason it hadn't was that it "couldn't."

Well, today Tesla put the doubts to rest with a blockbuster Q3 report -- not simply eking out a profit and small free cash flow growth, but $2.92 per-share profit and $881 million free cash flow -- almost raising the entire value of their convertible bond debt in a single quarter. While many were skeptical about Tesla's claims that it would go from near zero profit margin on Model 3s to their claimed target of 15%, Tesla instead hit a 20% margin on the Model 3 (now the highest-revenue car in the U.S.), with a 25.8% overall automotive gross margin. This was all achieved with only $52 million worth of zero-emission vehicle credits claimed this quarter. While Tesla bears will likely claim that this quarter was a one-off that won't be repeated, Tesla reiterates guidance for sustained profitability from herein, barring a force majeure event.

20 of 195 comments (clear)

  1. Waiting to hear... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm waiting to hear how Tesla is losing money on each car it sells, such as some people have been saying around here (FALSELY) for months. If they lose money on each car they sell, how did they wildly beat all the analysts by selling more of them?

    When everyone is telling you that you are wrong, sometimes it's a good idea to gain a little objectivity and at least examine the possibility that you actually are wrong.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    1. Re: Waiting to hear... by saloomy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not so. They report bot produced and delivered cars. Just take a look at the report to understand the company financials. It's much more intelligent than just talking out of your ass:

      The Latest 10-q
      The Update Letter

      Both of those documents are SEC filed.

    2. Re: Waiting to hear... by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      deliberately held off shipping (and, by GAAP rules, recognizing revenue) in Q2

      M3 deliveries were about 2,5k higher than production this quarter, vs. 56k deliveries. S+X was almost identical to production. Given that the automotive margin is over 25%.... no, that was not a material factor. Furthermore: Inventory in Q3: $3,31B. Inventory in Q2: $3,32B. The given the higher ASP in Q3, undelivered inventory is more valuable than undelivered inventory in Q2.

      --
      "What is the difference between a Ponzi Scheme and an Investment Bank?" -- Jon Stewart
    3. Re: Waiting to hear... by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Completely contradicted by the report (whether you want to talk gross profits or net profits), but hey, thanks for playing.

      --
      "What is the difference between a Ponzi Scheme and an Investment Bank?" -- Jon Stewart
    4. Re:Waiting to hear... by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      Model 3 was ranked "Average" in reliability by Consumer Reports. For a first model year vehicle, that's not bad at all. It retains a "recommended" rating from CR. S was downgraded because they switched to making air suspension standard, and there were some air suspension reliability issues (which Tesla states their supplier has fixed).

      --
      "What is the difference between a Ponzi Scheme and an Investment Bank?" -- Jon Stewart
    5. Re: Waiting to hear... by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

      By the way, did you ever save those children from the basement of that DC pizza restaurant?

      --
      "What is the difference between a Ponzi Scheme and an Investment Bank?" -- Jon Stewart
    6. Re: Waiting to hear... by saloomy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Your point was that they were not following GAAP accounting. Had you taken my advice and read the report I conveniently linked to you, you would have seen the very first sentence : Q2 Automotive gross margin increased to 20.6% GAAP and 21.0% non-GAAP.

      Thats their profit margin. Also, FYI, you book revenue when you ship, not produce. So having 13k vehicles in inventory is a drag on their balance sheet, not a boost.

    7. Re:Waiting to hear... by larryjoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm waiting to hear how Tesla is losing money on each car it sells, such as some people have been saying around here (FALSELY) for months. If they lose money on each car they sell, how did they wildly beat all the analysts by selling more of them?

      When everyone is telling you that you are wrong, sometimes it's a good idea to gain a little objectivity and at least examine the possibility that you actually are wrong.

      Tesla had its best quarter in a while. Hopefully, it can continue to execute in manufacturing cars and meet future debt payments. It's not out of the wood yet, but the direction looks good. A strong, successful Tesla will be good for consumers, the car market, and even for other car companies.

      However, since it's Tesla and Musk, the report stretches facts somewhat. "Model 3 was the best-selling car in the US in terms of revenue and the 5th best-selling car in terms of volume." Well, that's technically true, if you exclude the top-6(!) selling vehicles in the US. That is, if you exclude the 65-70% of the car market represented by trucks and SUVs, which are technically not cars, then the Model 3 is the top revenue seller. But, that doesn't sound as impressive, even though it actually is.

    8. Re: Waiting to hear... by AvitarX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I doubt that.

      The demand for gasoline range EVs with a huge quick charge network seems to be pretty high (see the way Tesla dominates at the price points they're able to make cars for leading me to believe that once one breaks the 250 or so mile threshold people relax a bit), and the model 3 hasn't even reached out globally, where EVs are doing pretty decent overall.

      Tesla does seem to be poised to be a top tear EV manufacturer in the long run, and are likely demonstrating that they are worth investing in to stick around (debt not equity) at this point.

      EVs are poised to be huge (once they become cheaper than regular cars, which will likely be in the next few years as gasoline engines continue to become more complex and EV components drop in price) and Tesla is poised to be a top tier competitor.

      Do I think they're worth more than GM right now? no

      I think at this point they'll stick around though, I won't be really confident until they have a smooth roll-out of a model though.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    9. Re: Waiting to hear... by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Fuck the cars, high end electric vehicles are a limited market. The big Tesla market, something the hedge fund shorts absolutely do not want to discuss, the home electric power systems, panels, batteries and control gear a far bigger market, probably something like 100 times the size of the vehicle market, each unit worth similar to a low end car and far more profitable, with numbers in the hundreds of millions. Yeah, keep talking Tesla vehicles and ignore the bigger market and the one far more damaging to the fossil fuellers.

      Tesla home power systems, cut your house from the grid, invest in a higher return than bank interest, far higher and fuel your Tesla vehicle from home. Corrupt hedge funders who did the shorts are quaking because that home energy market is about to take off, no matter how much they bribed lobbyists to bring their pet SEC agents onto the scene.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    10. Re:Waiting to hear... by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tesla had its best quarter in a while. Hopefully, it can continue to execute in manufacturing cars and meet future debt payments. It's not out of the wood yet, but the direction looks good. A strong, successful Tesla will be good for consumers, the car market, and even for other car companies.

      However, since it's Tesla and Musk, the report stretches facts somewhat. "Model 3 was the best-selling car in the US in terms of revenue and the 5th best-selling car in terms of volume." Well, that's technically true, if you exclude the top-6(!) selling vehicles in the US. That is, if you exclude the 65-70% of the car market represented by trucks and SUVs, which are technically not cars, then the Model 3 is the top revenue seller. But, that doesn't sound as impressive, even though it actually is.

      Agreed. For a car company that didn't exist twenty years ago, and whose market share was within the margin of error five years ago, even being #11 is pretty freaking amazing.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    11. Re: Waiting to hear... by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not just gas savings, though they are likely the most significant part of any savings once you switch to EV. It's other costs like no more engine, transmission fluid changes and even less wear and tear on brakes.

      I went from spending around $600-$700 a month on gas to spending around $50 with my PHEV. I haven't changed my driving habit or route, it's literally the cost savings just in gas . The oil changes in my PHEV are every 10,000km or 6 months. I have yet to hit 10,000km on the gas engine yet - I'm at 36,000km in just over a year of ownership and the mileage on the gas engine is less than 9,000km. The gas engine still kicks on periodically (even when the battery is fully charged) because I think it's programmed to cycle the oil etc. every now and then.

      Things Tesla owners have to worry about:
      - Brakes (although less frequently due to regenerative braking)
      - Battery pack (warrantied for 7 years minimum I believe)


      Things Tesla owners don't have to worry about
      - Engine oil & leaks
      - Transmission fluid & leaks
      - Power steering & leaks
      - Engine coolant & leaks
      - U-joints
      - Exhaust pipe corroding
      - Catalytic converter replacement
      - Spark plugs and wires
      - Camshafts, lifters, valves and anything else in a combustion engine

      The list goes on and on.

  2. There are some problems by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am a big Tesla fan. But we should acknowledge that there are still some problems. Mainly that the spare-parts supply chain hasn't caught up with manufacturing, leaving cars inoperable for months while Tesla's own shops wait for parts. If you want right-to-repair, Tesla hasn't caught up to that by making diagnostic tools available or parts available to non-partner shops and end-users.

    1. Re:There are some problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As long as that doesn't affect people's willingness to buy new Teslas, those aren't really immediate problems for the company.

  3. Can somebody count for me? by AlanObject · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I actually pay attention to all the Tesla/Musk/Tesla/Musk critics out there and follow their arguments about how the company is going to crash and burn and Musk is delusional and the technology won't work and the production can't work and the quality is crap gasoline is actually greener and cheaper and and the major automakers are going to bury them and the workers have reverted to savagery and yadda yadda.

    I have been following all that for, what, five years now? How many portentous pronouncements of Tesla and/or Musk's demise has there been? I have lost count.

    A few days ago my e-trade board delivered this little news nugget:

    Citron Research, which has previously advocated short positions on Tesla, says it has changed course, and that the electric car maker is "destroying the competition, as Citron makes the case for why it's taking a long-term view.

    So apparently there are short sellers out there will actually fold up the tent for another from-scratch assessment. Granted, they were wrong before so they could be wrong again. Tesla could still crash and burn or at least hit a major bump in the road. But if it does it will have nothing to do with what the chronic naysayers that post here say.

  4. Made a very good point about efficiency by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Elong said Tesla goes 4 miles per kWh, while the competition barely manages 2.6 miles/kWh to 3. (I think he is using Jaguar IPace not Bolt and Leaf). That allows him to get greater range using smaller battery. And Tesla makes batteries cheaper than anyone else (I think about 25% cheaper) that gives Tesla the edge and competitiveness.

    Elon also said "I begged the other companies to invest in battery capacity and charging networks" according to some live blogging site. And some thing along the lines of if they make an adapter he will let them use Tesla super chargers. Not sure if he really said that or these guys are putting words in his mouth.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  5. Literally Hitler by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tesla deliberately held off shipping (and, by GAAP rules, recognizing revenue) in Q2 in order to make Q3 numbers look good.

    I'm pretty sure your post is the part of the Hitler video near the beginning where he's waving hands and saying "This quarter doesn't matter because there's no way they can make next quarter because they deliberately held off shipping" and then the generals correct him, and he clears the room...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  6. Re:As usual Rei is misleading. by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

    Telsa have $1.15B due by the end of the next quarter,

    False. Tesla has $157M due in December, and another $920M due in March.

    which includes the Christmas slowdown

    Meanwhile, production keeps rising. If you're betting on a "Christmas slowdown" to save you, keep dreaming.

    This is only just starting. Fremont scales to at least 7k without new lines (confirmed not just by Tesla, but also analysts who've toured Fremont). Model 3 is designed for 25% margin at its full range of variants. I mean, what exactly did you all think would happen to margin over time? Shorts kept complaining about high scrap rates and excess labour requirements - did you think it would remain that way forever? It takes a long time to get those things down (Tesla is still slowly reducing production costs on the Model S), and reducing them equals margin. With the introduction of the MR, margin improvements will get eaten up by a lower ASP in Q4, but in Q1 you not only get further margin improvements, but also a higher ASP due to the start of high-end sales in Europe.

    Seriously, what exactly did you all expect was going to happen?

    --
    "What is the difference between a Ponzi Scheme and an Investment Bank?" -- Jon Stewart
  7. That statement doesn't match the term by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    TSLA longs lost over 17%

    While they may be DOWN by that much (but are not, see aftermarket) by definition "longs" have lost nothing... because if they are long, they are holding not selling.

    I bought some shares in the middle of the year but I have "lost" nothing because why on earth would I sell? The end game is way north of $400, by the end I will have made quite a lot on TSLA (and some of it I bought longer ago when it was a lot cheaper).

    As a long investor what I do is pick stocks that I think have lots of potential, put money into them, and maybe look a few times a year to see how things are going. That's how you long, not bailing out at the first sign of any dip. If you choose well the dips fade away and you have mostly growth across a portfolio. Maybe someone doing day trading is making more but I'm pretty sure I'm leading a less stressful life.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  8. Losing money on early production is normal by sjbe · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm waiting to hear how Tesla is losing money on each car it sells, such as some people have been saying around here (FALSELY) for months.

    Tesla HAS been losing money on each car they sell. That is a factual statement. But it doesn't mean what some people think it means. People here keep confusing gross margin with net margin and haven't a clue what free cash flow is or fixed costs or variable costs.

    It's absolutely normal for a new product to lose money on the first units they produce because they haven't produced enough units to amortize the fixed costs over. Here's a oversimplified totally-made-up example. I spend $1,000,000 making an assembly line - one time cost never to be repeated. It also costs $500,000 per year to operate the assembly line no matter how many units I make whether it be 1 or 100,000. So before I make a single unit I have $1.5 million in operating costs. Let's say I'm selling a car for $50,000 and my actual cost of labor and materials in that car is $40,000 so I have a gross profit of $10,000 per vehicle. That means the first 150 vehicles I make are going to be sold at a loss. I also have to sell a minimum of 50 vehicles every year just to cover the fixed costs of operation.

    Tesla is in that exact situation, just with much larger numbers. The have the added wrinkle that they also have a lot of debt to service (around $11 billion reportedly) which can be treated as an additional fixed cost.