Slashdot Mirror


Thousands of Swedes Are Inserting Microchips Under Their Skin (npr.org)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from NPR: In Sweden, a country rich with technological advancement, thousands have had microchips inserted into their hands. The chips are designed to speed up users' daily routines and make their lives more convenient -- accessing their homes, offices and gyms is as easy as swiping their hands against digital readers. They also can be used to store emergency contact details, social media profiles or e-tickets for events and rail journeys within Sweden. Proponents of the tiny chips say they're safe and largely protected from hacking, but one scientist is raising privacy concerns around the kind of personal health data that might be stored on the devices.

Around the size of a grain of rice, the chips typically are inserted into the skin just above each user's thumb, using a syringe similar to that used for giving vaccinations. The procedure costs about $180. So many Swedes are lining up to get the microchips that the country's main chipping company says it can't keep up with the number of requests. More than 4,000 Swedes have adopted the technology, with one company, Biohax International, dominating the market. The chipping firm was started five years ago by Jowan Osterlund, a former professional body piercer. After spending the past two years working full time on the project, he is currently developing training materials so he can hire Swedish doctors and nurses to help take on some of his heavy workload.

26 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. Where's my axe? by fyngyrz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where's my axe?

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  2. How about a ring instead? by chispito · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why not wear a chipped ring instead? That way you can change your ID if it gets compromised and no knives are involved.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    1. Re:How about a ring instead? by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why not wear a chipped ring instead? That way you can change your ID if it gets compromised and no knives are involved.

      One way or the other the main thing is getting everything to work on the same standard. I mean I could replace my door lock with an electronic one, but it'd use its own chips. My car has its own key fob. Work has its own access card. My gym has its own access card. If I could get one ring that I could "load up" with all my various identifications, that'd be great. Ideally with some sort of PIN for when just the ring's presence is not enough.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:How about a ring instead? by johannesg · · Score: 5, Funny

      If I could get one ring that I could "load up" with all my various identifications, that'd be great.

      One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, One ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them. That'd be great.

  3. Re:This is hack proof! :) by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Thieves are dumb, so you can't rule this out. But think about it: a guy has his thumb chopped off and the guy who has his thumb possesses a completely unique piece of evidence that ties him alone to the crime. Further, this thumb is useless unless he actually USES it. It's an electronic ID chip, so he immediately subjects himself to an absolutely known time and location with every swipe.

    Yeah, that thief will be very hard to catch.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  4. Re:This is hack proof! :) by avandesande · · Score: 2

    Probably not couldn't you use a man in the middle attack to get the key? Similar to attacks with automotive key fobs.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  5. Logan's Run by valnar · · Score: 5, Funny

    At 30, do they go Carousel?

  6. NO FLIPPING WAY by p51d007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bad enough we have so much crap, face ID, chip cards and all this other crap. It's just more conditioning, so in the years/decades to follow people become even more accepting to this crap. "it's for your safety, for your convenience" Load of BS. It more for tracking, data mining and all other crap. Eventually they will load these with a death dart, and at some point when you are no longer good to "the state" they can just cut you down.

  7. Re:Timothy McVeigh by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    Timothy McVeigh believed the Feds had implanced a chip on him and were controlling him. So he went and made a fertilizer bomb and killed 160 people!

    The real question is, why did the FBI tell him to blow up one of their own buildings? The answer is that it was a transparent false flag operation to keep chipped people from suspecting they too might be chipped as it interferes with the programming! I'd tell you more about it but my chip is erasing my memory of this conversation. ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  8. Re:Mark of the Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Those verses translates as "on", not "in".

    Also, it says "mark" not "invisible implant".

    The mark will be visible because it will be a political sign.. it has nothing to do with technology. Notice that it says you can have 1 of 3 options: the mark, the name or the number. In order for a name to stop you, it really has to be political rather than technological.

  9. Re:Huge surprise! by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Basically rampant Feminism and Stupid Juvenile Whiners such as Sweden's Feminizing Boys with Genderless Schools

    --
    "When you don't stand for something, you'll fall for everything."

  10. Functional piercings for old people by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In being the "IT country doctor" in a high-end retirement area, everyone's biggest IT problem I encounter here is keeping track of passwords. If an implanted read-only chip full of large random numbers were offered as an alternative to the whole password mess, 95% of this town would be on it like stink on skunk. No more lists of passwords in spidery handwriting taped onto monitors, no more having to come up with online identifiers cobbled up to satisfy increasingly arcane security rules and then forgotten. To log onto anything from your system, just place the palm of your hand on a USB-connected reader and the app, operating system or website would use the I'th random number on the chip as your password.

    For our seasoned citizens, an authentication chip would be the greatest thing since Medicare.

  11. No Thanks by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why not wear a chipped ring instead? That way you can change your ID... ...to the person you stole it from.

    An ID "ring" appeals even less to me than a chip implant, because at least it's a lot harder for someone to grab an internal chip to spoof being me.

    I think the smartest way to go about this would be to implant the chip at the top of your head, that way when you didn't want it read you could wear a tinfoil hat. Talk about killing two birds with one stone!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:No Thanks by chispito · · Score: 2

      Why not wear a chipped ring instead? That way you can change your ID... ...to the person you stole it from.

      An ID "ring" appeals even less to me than a chip implant, because at least it's a lot harder for someone to grab an internal chip to spoof being me.

      I think the smartest way to go about this would be to implant the chip at the top of your head, that way when you didn't want it read you could wear a tinfoil hat. Talk about killing two birds with one stone!

      You don't need to steal it, you just have to spoof it. Same as ID badges that we already use. And again... no surgery required.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  12. $180?! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    I did the exact same thing with my dog several years ago, and it cost less than $60.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:$180?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      At first I was really started by your post, then I realized it was an article about RFID chips and not prostitution.

    2. Re:$180?! by mentil · · Score: 5, Funny

      What a ripoff, that's $420 in dog dollars.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    3. Re:$180?! by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Funny

      I did the exact same thing with my dog several years ago, and it cost less than $60.

      You need to hold your dog up to your doorknob for it to unlock? What happens if the dog runs away? How will go work out at the gym if the dog is asleep?

  13. Re:Sores? by arth1 · · Score: 2

    From what I've read, it does cause problems for some. It's a small glass tube implanted in the fleshy part between the thumb and index finger, which works well for most. Except those that use that part of both hands quite a bit, like woodworkers and mechanics.

    I imagine it might interfere with some sports and recreation too, like archery, cross country skiing, tequila drinking, rappelling and foosball.

  14. Re:what's the goal? save time? by arth1 · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure what the average is, but Swedes like to live in the countryside (not just suburbs) or different cities than where they work, and quite a few commute by train.
    It's not uncommon for train commuters to start working while on the train, using laptops and mobile phones.

  15. Re: Huge surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, it's terrible when a country is prosperous, tolerant, with a high degree of happiness in its population. Sad times indeed.

  16. Re:This is hack proof! :) by fisted · · Score: 2

    Unless it features contacts on the outside of the skin, it is a transceiver.

  17. Documentary by TimMD909 · · Score: 2

    Wasn't there a documentary about what to do when pure, concentrated evil gets into your hand? I recall the name "Ash" and a chainsaw later replacing the possessed hand...

  18. Re:Mark of the Beast by Daralantan · · Score: 2

    Early manuscripts tend to point to a copying error and indicate the original text as having 616 instead of 666,

    I recall seeing something about the reason it is 666, is because 7 is considered a holy / perfect number. So the 3 (also a special number in Christianity) 6's represent being incomplete.

    Also seeing this show up reminds me of some email from almost 20 years ago stating that Bill Gates was the anti-Christ. It said the mouse (as in us holding the mouse in our hand.. therefor it was like a mark on the hand?) was the sign required on the hands... And then it used military code or whatever to turn his name and some other name into 666. Then some hilarious claim that if you had some nonexistent version of Excel, you could open up a secret section of it with a "hall of the damned" list of names. I wonder if I still have that email, it was pretty hilarious in how dark and foreboding it sounded.

  19. I implanted one 5 years ago - it's very convenient by gachunt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had my friend (registered nurse) implant an RFID chip about 5 years ago in my hand. Since then, I have wired the doors on my house, garage, vehicles and safe with chip scanners.

    It is incredibly convenient to have this chip. I use it daily. Saves me time. And the geeky cool factor hasn't waned.

    Two unique stories about my chip:

    1. 1. It was a unique conversation with my sister, who is my executor, to explain that the chip will need to be dug out of my hand to get to my will.

    2. 2. The admin assistant at my office overheard me talking about my chip, and I had to spend 15 minutes calming her down and explaining that I am not the Beast, and have no plans to enslave the world's population.

  20. Re:Huge surprise! by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

    Basically rampant Feminism and Stupid Juvenile Whiners such as Sweden's Feminizing Boys with Genderless Schools

    -- "When you don't stand for something, you'll fall for everything."

    Okay, I just read the article at Huff post. As a left-leaning person, I think that is fucking stupid. You are clearly out of real problems to solve if you are concerned about what position people are in when they pee. Shit like that gives the left a bad name.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)