Slashdot Mirror


Android Pie Has a Battery Life Problem (venturebeat.com)

Emil Protalinski, writing for VentureBeat: After upgrading to Android Pie, most users have either seen a slight improvement in battery life or reported no perceivable difference. But soon after we published our story, some users told us that they are experiencing the opposite: significantly higher battery drain after upgrading to Pie. We've been tracking this issue for the past few months, during which the Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL launched with Android Pie out-of-the-box and new device owners reported similar problems. Some Android Pie users simply don't expect their phones to make it through the day.

Users on Reddit, the Pixel forums, and Google's issue tracker have been discussing battery life issues on existing devices after upgrading to Android Pie, and some even on new devices (although there are naturally fewer of those cases). VentureBeat was able to independently confirm the issue on a Pixel 2 XL and a Pixel 3 -- we sent the details to Google. Given that Adaptive Battery is the main feature highlight when it comes to battery improvement in Android Pie, many suspected it could be the culprit. Users have reported, however, that turning it off didn't help the situation much, if at all. We were also able to independently verify that Adaptive Battery is not the cause. Adaptive Battery is only available in Pie, but in our tests battery life only drained faster with the feature off. We did, however, confirm that the problem is unique to Android Pie. Users have reported significant battery drain when their phones are idle, anywhere between 10 percent to 20 percent drained in an hour.

76 comments

  1. What comes around goes around... by cre1mer · · Score: 0

    Jon Prosser explained in a recent video that he left iOS a few years ago because it was a mess, just got a gold iPhone XS because iOS is working again, and Android is in the same mess as iOS was a few years ago.

    1. Re: What comes around goes around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up you fat piece of shit. No one cares.

    2. Re: What comes around goes around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The video you posted says why he left android. You fucking fat fuck.

    3. Re:What comes around goes around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm trying to parse your grammar and my head hurts. It was a mess because his gold iPhone XS works? You got an iPhone XS? He said Android is in the same mess? What are you trying to say?

    4. Re:What comes around goes around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so hard on Chris, he has hearing loss in one ear.

  2. No it doesnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Android versions have a battery problem.

    1. Re:No it doesnt by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      Mine doesn't. If I don't play stupid games, or watch videos. My phone will last all day and night.

      You do know, if you turn off notifications. Turn down the screen brightness. Have the screen go off line quicker. The battery will last longer. Or what, are just an idiot that has no clue how to do simple functions like that.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    2. Re:No it doesnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, my phone lasts all day if I dont use it. Awesome, this is amazon. 1 whole day!

    3. Re:No it doesnt by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      It also helps to uninstall needless things like the 'Facebook' app. I only allow a few things to issue notifications. Email and calendar.

  3. Maybe Android needs to take a page from Apple here by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From one of the links:

    "Phones sometimes shut down abruptly when Android reports 5 percent battery life left."

    Hmm, doesn't it sound awfully a lot like Android users could benefit from the optional Processor Throttling feature also posted on Slashdot today? Maybe having that around as an option is not a bad idea after all.

    I wonder if there's anything on Android like a battery capacity check? Maybe it's simpler failing batteries with lower capacity that are seeing lower life under Android Pie for some reason...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  4. Re:Cue the Android / Apple bitchfest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who gives a fuck, it's a damn phone. Get a life fanboys.

    People who own one of these things and need it for work? I'm on 24 hour standby for emergency tech support one week every month, the last thing I need is a phone that keeps switching off on me.

  5. Android update kills old phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine that.

    You think Google would sell out users for the fees from cell phone makers?

    I know Google sold out to the Communist Chinese, but that's not like selling out to those EVUL CAPITALIST PIGS at Verizon.

  6. So many bad updates these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just expect any new OS upgrade from any developer will have issues and require multiple revisions if not a possible halt to the release like in the Windows 10 1809 or the Apple IOS 12.1 for Apple Watch. The trouble is, so many of these upgrades are now pushed or forced updated and that means little choice in dealing with these problems.

    1. Re: So many bad updates these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you an idiot? Google dosent have shit in china compared to Apple who basically bent over and ler China stick their Wang all over their servers.

  7. Liars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MY Android Pie phone doesn't have this problem, so no one's does!

    Just like with Windows 10, MY upgrade to v1809 didn't delete any files, so anyone who says it did is a Trump-supporting LIAR!

  8. Hair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pie

  9. Re:Cue the Android / Apple bitchfest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously, every fucking mobile phone has a battery life problem.

  10. Re:Maybe Android needs to take a page from Apple h by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hmm, doesn't it sound awfully a lot like Android users could benefit from the optional Processor Throttling feature also posted on Slashdot today? Maybe having that around as an option is not a bad idea after all. No, there is a battery save option already on the damn thing.

    --
    Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
  11. 5 Days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Pixel XL lasts about 3 days on a charge sticking with Android 7. Ever since I upgraded a phone from Android 4 to 4.3 and completely lost the ability to use VPN and my wife's phone was bricked by an update from 7 to 8.1, I NEVER upgrade my phone's OS.

  12. Pie == 9.0 by 14erCleaner · · Score: 4, Funny

    For those of you who can't remember the correlation between the stupid names and the version numbers. My brand-new phone, in its setting menus, only tells me the number, so I had to use google (ironically) to find out if I was a "Pie" user. I guess I have Jellybean or Kit Kat or Maple Syrup or something equally uninformative as my version...sigh...

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
    1. Re:Pie == 9.0 by gargeug · · Score: 1

      But they are 'edgy' and 'unique' and 'hip', and are the likely result of non-tech people inserting themselves into the tech industry and making a need for themselves and their jobs. Android 9.0 would be much more useful...

    2. Re:Pie == 9.0 by nasch · · Score: 2

      It's worse than that even. Besides the version number (9) and the name (Pie) there's also something called an API level that only developers see (28). Name -> number would be easy to figure out if it were always a major revision number, but it isn't. For example they didn't get to version 2 until Eclair, which starts with the 5th letter in the alphabet. Then Eclair, Froyo, and Gingerbread are all version 2.something. And so on. Only recently have names lined up with exactly one major revision number.

    3. Re:Pie == 9.0 by farble1670 · · Score: 2

      It's worse than that even. Besides the version number (9) and the name (Pie) there's also something called an API level that only developers see (28).

      Android version (7,8,9) and the SDK version (25,26,27) are independent. Moreover, the SDK version is not something a user of Android knows or needs to care about.

    4. Re:Pie == 9.0 by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      The beauty of it is that Android developers have the freedom to build their apps at the API level they wish. You can release your app to run on Android Versions as old as 4.0 or 2.3 if you wish. It's your option as a developer.

      Apple, on the other hand, urges and as much as they can forces their developers to always build at the edge-tip of the API using the latest version of their closed-source toolchain.

    5. Re:Pie == 9.0 by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      If you can't remember what letter of the alphabet you are up to, how are you supposed to remember the number?

    6. Re:Pie == 9.0 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It's worse than that even.

      only developers see (28)

      So it's not worse at all then since no one ever sees the API version number.

    7. Re: Pie == 9.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well your statement is now false as devs apps need to target Android 9 api level to publish on the store starting November 1st this year, so today.

      The minimum api level they can do now is the one that released with 5.0

    8. Re:Pie == 9.0 by nasch · · Score: 1

      Android version (7,8,9) and the SDK version (25,26,27) are independent.

      No they aren't. Here's Google's documentation on them: https://source.android.com/set...

      Moreover, the SDK version is not something a user of Android knows or needs to care about.

      That's what I said. It's right there in the text you quoted.

    9. Re:Pie == 9.0 by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      No they aren't. Here's Google's documentation on them: https://source.android.com/set... [android.com]

      Maybe you don't understand. The SDK version and the Android version vary independently. There's obviously a mapping between them, but if you look in the link you pasted for a single Android version with 2 different SDK versions, and two different Android versions have a single SDK version. So obviously you can't have "Android version X == SDK version X". You're the one that said it's "worse". It's not "worse" it's a necessity. One is an API version and one is a software version. There are completely different concepts.

      That's what I said. It's right there in the text you quoted.

      Yes, and the whole point of your post was how it gets "worse" because there's an SDK version. Users never even know about that. So why is it worse?

    10. Re:Pie == 9.0 by nasch · · Score: 1

      So developers are no one?

    11. Re:Pie == 9.0 by nasch · · Score: 1

      The SDK version and the Android version vary independently. There's obviously a mapping between them

      It can't be both. Either they are independent, or there's a mapping between them.

      if you look in the link you pasted for a single Android version with 2 different SDK versions

      Which Android version number has more than one API level?

      Users never even know about that. So why is it worse?

      Because developers are people too.

    12. Re:Pie == 9.0 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      In terms of the end user experience. Yes developers are no-one. Developers spend their lives pouring through libraries, references, APIs, all of which have nothing to do with the name or number of the software presented to users. On top of that developers are the one set of people who have access to all the hot little information right at their fingertips.

      I stand by my comment, NO-ONE will be confused or impacted by this.
      Consumers don't see it.
      Developers have it cross referenced in every tool they see or use.

      Just for fun you can go to developers.android.com and click on Pie, then click release notes. Here's the first 10 words on the page:
      "Android 9 features and APIs
      Android 9 (API level 28) introduces great new features..." On the left side is a lovely menu referencing Pie, Android 9 and API 28+

      Or maybe just fire up Visual Studio and when you make a new project and have to select a target framework pick out one like:
      "Android 9.0 (API Level 28 - Pie)"

      If you're a developer and you're getting confused, please stop developing. You're probably just going to produce software that puts your users at risk.

    13. Re:Pie == 9.0 by nasch · · Score: 1

      In terms of the end user experience. Yes developers are no-one.

      That's an interesting perspective, since without developers there would be no end user experience. Or end users.

      Or maybe just fire up Visual Studio

      Visual Studio for Android development? No thanks.

      If you're a developer and you're getting confused, please stop developing.

      While I understand it can be amusing to make up stuff, I never mentioned being confused. Perhaps you're the one who is confused actually. You're mentioning all these resources for finding the relationship between the various pieces of information, when the comment that started this whole conversation specifically mentioned finding the information via a web search. Literally no one is saying the information is not available.

    14. Re:Pie == 9.0 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting perspective, since without developers there would be no end user experience. Or end users.

      If that's what you read in my post then you missed the point. Developers and end users by their very nature REQUIRE two completely different experiences. What is presented to one should be completely different to what is presented to the other.

      Visual Studio for Android development? No thanks.

      Whatever floats your boat.

      While I understand it can be amusing to make up stuff, I never mentioned being confused. Perhaps you're the one who is confused actually. You're mentioning all these resources for finding the relationship between the various pieces of information, when the comment that started this whole conversation specifically mentioned finding the information via a web search. Literally no one is saying the information is not available.

      "It's worse than that even. Besides the version number (9) and the name (Pie) there's also something called an API level that only developers see (28). Name -> number would be easy to figure out if it were always a major revision number, but it isn't. "
      Quite possibly you're as bad at understanding a point as you are making it.

  13. Oh, Android by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 4, Informative

    As a long time Android user I have to say this: there are two areas where Android totally completely utterly sucks: battery management and process management.

    Battery management: it's nigh impossible to understand what exactly is draining your memory, how often your device wakes up and what sensors are in use unless you install quite specific apps and grant them quite specific permissions via adb, which is near impossible for 99% of users out there. And even when you do all of that, in most cases you're still left without any solutions because you don't know how to force Android not to use the said sensors or not to wake your device as often as it does. Also, most sensors in Android are 100% nondescript: you're looking at some weird combinations of symbols and digits and in most cases you cannot even Google for them. It's not like Android says: rotation-vector sensor is being used 100% of the time or anything like that.

    Process management: in the past you could at least install certain apps which could show overall CPU usage and the CPU usage of each active app. Nowadays, there are no such options even when you enable development mode. Google did that for the sake of security but in the process they made Android even less opaque than it was before. Then you have another issue: which apps are indeed running in memory? which apps are swapped out? which are cached? It's all a fucking mess and unless you've rooted your device your only option is "Memory" [Information] which is simply a fucking abomination as it doesn't even show current info: it only shows aggregated stats for the past 3/6/12/24 hours.

    For the past three development cycles (Android 7/8/9) I've created bug reports, i.e. feature requests, in Android bug tracker but each time they were either rejected or abandoned.

    Google is hell-bent on making Android's internals opaque for the user and nothing so far has been able to persuade them otherwise.

    The end result is that Android users are royally fucked but Google doesn't seem to care one bit.

    And then you have this (a little bit outdated but still mostly relevant).

    1. Re:Oh, Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you guys wonder why many consumers prefer the simplified iPhone experience.

    2. Re:Oh, Android by sacrilicious · · Score: 2

      Battery management: it's nigh impossible to understand what exactly is draining your memory

      (I'm assuming you meant battery instead of memory.) I just go to the "Battery" thing in settings, and it gives a detailed breakdown of exactly how much power each app or process has been using. Am I missing something?

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    3. Re:Oh, Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um battery life was perfectly fine on my Pixel 2 XL before PIE.

    4. Re:Oh, Android by ftobin · · Score: 1

      It only shows how much battery was used per process since when you last fully recharged. I never charge above 85% to reduce battery stress, so I can't see a breakdown of say, the last 30 minutes.

      A good example of this failing during last night, something was eating my battery, but since the history includes everything over the last 4 days, I can't look in detail at the more recent timeperiod.

    5. Re:Oh, Android by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Battery management: it's nigh impossible to understand what exactly is draining your memory, how often your device wakes up and what sensors are in use unless you install quite specific apps and grant them quite specific permissions via adb, which is near impossible for 99% of users out there.

      To be fair to those 99% of users they likely just charge their device at night and don't have problems. If your battery needs "management" you're either the most power of power users, your phone needs a factory reset, or your phone needs to be replaced/repaired.

    6. Re:Oh, Android by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

      a detailed breakdown of exactly how much power each app or process has been using. Am I missing something?

      You're missing close to 90% of battery information which Android is hiding from you. Google for GSam Battery Monitor and BetterBatteryStats. Both require advanced permissions which could only be granted by using adb.

    7. Re:Oh, Android by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, that's why there are literally tens of thousands of messages from Android users who disable Wi-Fi and cellular data and "enjoy" up to 35% battery drain overnight and this drain is not shown in Battery information.

      Oh, wait, I've seen such messages even from Google Pixel owners. These phones must be perfect, right? Android straight from its creators.

      So, you're right, I'm the geekest geek and people are making things up and Android battery management is perfect. Except it sucks.

      You see I've owned close to a dozen Android devices and I have yet to see a single one where battery information is complete and self-explanatory and you're always in control of your battery discharge.

    8. Re:Oh, Android by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. Now that I think about it, it may be that what I see is different than most, I'm a LineageOS user... not sure if their display is different or not...

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    9. Re:Oh, Android by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      Android is kinda like democracy: the worst mobile OS, except for all the rest.

      Honestly it's a shame Google is in control; they've proven to be petulant and untrustworthy at every turn. What we really need, badly, is a fork with some serious muscle behind it.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    10. Re:Oh, Android by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, that's why there are literally tens of thousands of messages from Android users who disable Wi-Fi and cellular data and "enjoy" up to 35% battery drain overnight and this drain is not shown in Battery information.

      As I said, a micromanaging power user. I.e. one of the 1% (10s of thousands seems about the right number) that actually don't do something simple like have their phone on charge overnight.

      So, you're right, I'm the geekest geek and people are making things up and Android battery management is perfect. Except it sucks.

      Why are you putting words in my mouth?
      Yes, you are the geekiest of geek (wave at your fellow geeks here on Slashdot).
      I didn't say Android battery management is perfect. I said micromanagement isn't needed for 99% of people.

      You see I've owned close to a dozen Android devices and I have yet to see a single one where battery information is complete and self-explanatory and you're always in control of your battery discharge.

      You see I've owned close to a dozen Android devices where I've never looked at or cared about battery information beyond the little percentage symbol in the top right. My phone gets hours of screen time and call time per day and I use it to navigate to and from work. I typically have 1/3rd charge still at night when it lands on the charger.

      Battery management may well suck. Few people give a shit. Hell even my girlfriend used to turn her Wifi, bluetooth, location etc off and on manually until I told her she should try just not doing it to see what happens. Nothing happened. Tiny bit more battery drain and her life (and phone use) went on.

      I and many others have better shit to do than micromanage the devices which are supposed to make our life easier.

    11. Re:Oh, Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then you have this (a little bit outdated but still mostly relevant).

      I see we have a Pawneean with us today.

      Ben: Who still uses Alta Vista?

    12. Re:Oh, Android by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's completely free with no strings attached that's why people are still using it?

  14. Re:Maybe Android needs to take a page from Apple h by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 0

    You think processor scaling doesn't exist on Android and you're posting logged in?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  15. Re:Maybe Android needs to take a page from Apple h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Android has this and Google didn't have to hide it or lie about its existence.

  16. Re:Cue the Android / Apple bitchfest by SpzToid · · Score: 1

    Have you considered use of a landline? Granted it won't work at Starbucks or Wal-Mart, but...

    Wait, 24 hour tech support for a week's duration? OK, I give up. That's extreme I.T. you're living in.

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  17. Re:Cue the Android / Apple bitchfest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who gives a fuck, it's a damn phone. Get a life fanboys.

    People who own one of these things and need it for work? I'm on 24 hour standby for emergency tech support one week every month, the last thing I need is a phone that keeps switching off on me.

    Why the hell would you use your own personal phone for this?!

    If your company demands this they need to issue you a corporate phone that they own. There are loads of good reasons for this.

  18. I see the same on new releases of Oreo. by davecb · · Score: 1

    Two upgrades ago it was fine, but with the last two, out of luck. A colleague with the same phone has the same problem: I think they back-ported a bug (:-))

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  19. Didn't upgrade by bobbutts · · Score: 2

    I have a Pixel 2 and am sticking with 8.1 Oreo. It runs great and I didn't see anything in 9.x that I have any need for.

    1. Re:Didn't upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Pixel 2 and am sticking with 8.1 Oreo. It runs great and I didn't see anything in 9.x that I have any need for.

      It's interesting to note that we have grown complacent in the recent proliferation of cheap desktop PCs and decade-long expectations for computer lifetimes.

      It's been easy to assume that upgrading to Windows 7 or Windows 8 or Windows 9^H10 we take no considerable penalties, but in hindsight those are desktop hardware rules for Wintel PCs. Laptop muscle was always under different rules where doing an in-place upgrade would leave you with a weezing computer unless you also upgraded its ram. Laptop innards upgrades rarely seem to involve changing the CPU. Phones and tablets are black boxes where this is outside the realm of our reach. But we play by old rules that have proven fruitful for years... decades even. The problem is that mobile is a world of sealed appliances now, and exponential growth in system requirements can't be offset. Running into walls that we've learned to unsee for the past decade is no fun.

      Upgrading software should never be done without the accompanying twofold increase in hardware specs (at least RAM). This makes phone inadequate for any OS increases even at the top of the line, though forum people tend to claim the effect is bearable. Android and iOS made it taboo to quit programs when we mean to quit them, so all that ill design under tight constraints mixes with other modern anti patterns and becomes a force multiplier towards a less useful experience ("ram is cheap!" didn't expect a phone where ram is an immutable number). And while devs' custom of demanding maxed out ram on their machines and getting a refresh to the latest shiny phone every couple years, we're seeing numbers that prove users settle for old hardware and don't have the luxury of being on multigigabyte phones with gobs of free local space.

    2. Re:Didn't upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you don't need more datamining and artificial intelligence "experience"? Guess where the battery drain comes from ;).

  20. Read up on how it works by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    No, there is a battery save option already on the damn thing.

    Adaptive Battery on Android is very different than the feature I'm talking about. Is there a battery saving feature that works the way Apple's does b throttling back a little when the battery is degraded?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re: Read up on how it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, battery saver throttles CPU down, among other things. It is also trivial to do in a rooted phone using a terminal.

  21. Battery consumer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't configure a 5GHz wifi connection.

  22. This is why I wait to upgrade my phones by Kevoco · · Score: 1

    6 months from now all this B.S. will be over, the Pixel 3 will be solid, and I'll buy one off Swappa for about 65% the current new price. And it will work just fine.

  23. I'm confused.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an S7, on Oreo and had battery problems after installing. The problem is with all the background CRAP running from Google'n CO. Seriously, the phone never gets to enter a deep sleep. Radios are constantly on.

    I say "had" because I was able to work around it for the most part by removing bloat and in some cases chmod -x the binaries just so it wouldn't spawn. The CPU scheduler has a whole lot to do with it too especially if you flash a respin. Short version is some try to keep the cpus pegged at full speed but that doesn't do anything besides give you inflated benchmarks.

    - Root the device
    - Remove Google bloat
    - Remove OEM bloat
    - Remove "Partner" bloat ( ie Facebook)
    - Remove Carrier bloat
    - Run in airplane mode (there's something even in Oreo that keeps the phone very busy)

    Only then will you come anywhere near their claimed battery times.

    1. Re:I'm confused.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's that lagging eng kernel treating you?

  24. Re:Maybe Android needs to take a page from Apple h by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 0

    as much as Haters like to

    Can't you ramble on with your cult dog-whistles someplace else?

  25. Re:Maybe Android needs to take a page from Apple h by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Hmm, doesn't it sound awfully a lot like Android users could benefit from the optional Processor Throttling feature also posted on Slashdot today?

    Or more likely doesn't it sound like we could all use more accurate estimates for battery life remaining at the very edge of a battery's usable life. Seriously these kinds of estimates are hard to make. But since you need a low power option it may be worth mentioning that not only has Android had such a feature for a good 5+ years now, but you can even set it to automatically activate at a low battery on most phones.

    I wonder if there's anything on Android like a battery capacity check? Maybe it's simpler failing batteries with lower capacity that are seeing lower life under Android Pie for some reason...

    Every single release of Android to date, and I'm sure every release of iOS has had people reporting battery life problems. It's far more likely that the upgrades are hitting edge case bugs.

  26. THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES FOR YOUR ENTIRE FAMILY

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  27. Re:Maybe Android needs to take a page from Apple h by LordKronos · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nor did Apple ever hide or lie about this, as much as Haters like to pretend they did

    Jan 23, 2017 - iOS 10.2.1 is released, which is the first version (that we know of) to begin slowing down phones.

    For months and months forum posters speculated they may be slowing down the phones. Apple says nothing.

    December 18, 2017 - John Poole from Geekbench pulls together benchmarks from 100k iphones and creates irrefutable graphs showing how performance is throttled, and exactly which version it started happening for each iPhone version

    December 20, 2017 - Apple finally admits to slowing down phones.

    Nope, they didn't hide anything. Its just pure coincidence that Apple sat silent for almost an entire year***, and then suddenly 2 days after the irrefutable evidence surfaces Apple decides they should probably let users know about it.

    Yeah, and it's the haters that are pretending, right?

    ***actually it may have been longer than a year, as apple's December statement admitting to it said they introduced it "last year"

  28. Oh, Android. by Bram+Stolk · · Score: 1

    Android and battery use...

    Unsurprising that a battery wont last.
    Hook up your phone to a PC and do âadb logcatâ(TM) to see a whirlwind of logs flying by at the speed of light.

    So.....much......crap.

    Iâ(TM)m a mobile dev, and Android devices are just too bloated. iOS bloat is growing too btw, but Android is in a league of its own.

    I dare you... adb logcat, and try to read it. You canâ(TM)t.

    --
    Bram Stolk http://stolk.org/tlctc/
    1. Re:Oh, Android. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell! With all those (TM)s, I can barely read your POST!

  29. Once a trashfire, always a trashfire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The google like of phones has ALWAYS had battery problem, i mean not like note 7 problems but still the nexus and pixel lines batteries have always been a weak point. I have to replace the battery on my 6P one a year or it starts shutting down at 40%. just look at the number of class action lawsuits google has against them for battery Issues. If you want the latest bleeding edge, yes get a google flagship phone, but if you dont want to be a beta tester, go with anyone else.

  30. It is Android .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Android is the good enough for Google's (not so talented) developers. Battery, memory, performance and security problems are features not issues or bugs.

  31. Wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's always the wifi, especially when you're being spied on.

  32. Re:Cue the Android / Apple bitchfest by Gabest · · Score: 1

    Thank you for the reminder. Almost forgot that it was also a phone!

  33. Telemetry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telemetry like GPS, wifi point thumprinting, etc, does a good job of sucking battery, and given this is google, it seems safe to assume this is the reason (whatever the faux excuse is offered up to be)

  34. Data Mining Tool Provided By Advertising Company by johnsie · · Score: 1

    Only a mug would use Android.