Slashdot Mirror


Compelling New Suspect For DB Cooper Skyjacking Found By Army Data Analyst (oregonlive.com)

A U.S. Army officer with a security clearance and a "solid professional reputation" believes he's solved the infamous D.B. Cooper skyjacking case -- naming two now-dead men in New Jersey who have never before been suspected, "possibly breaking wide open the only unsolved skyjacking case in U.S. history," according to the Oregonian. The data analyst started his research because, simply enough, he had stumbled upon an obscure old book called "D.B. Cooper: What Really Happened," by the late author Max Gunther. Gunther wrote that he was contacted in 1972 by a man who claimed to be the skyjacker... Using the name "Dan LeClair" and various details from the book, as well as information from the FBI's D.B. Cooper case files that have become public in recent years, Anonymous tracked the bread crumbs to a very real man named Dan Clair, a World War II Army veteran who died in 1990... Continuing his research, our anonymous Army officer eventually determined that Clair probably was not D.B. Cooper. More likely the skyjacker was a friend and co-worker of Clair's, a native New Jerseyan by the name of William J. Smith, who died in January of this year at age 89... Clair and Smith worked together at Penn Central Transportation Co. and one of its predecessors. For a while, they were both "yardies" at the Oak Island rail yard in Newark. It appears they bonded in the 1960s as Penn Central struggled to adapt to a changing economy.

The data analyst says the two men's military backgrounds -- Smith served in the Navy -- and long experience in the railroad business would have made it possible for either of them to successfully parachute from a low-flying jetliner, find railroad tracks once they were on the ground, and hop a freight train back to the East Coast. Poring over a 1971 railroad atlas, the hijacked plane's flight path and the skyjacker's likely jump zone, he determined that no matter where D.B. Cooper landed, he would have been no more than 5-to-7 miles from tracks. "I believe he would have been able to see Interstate 5 from the air," he says, adding that one rail line ran parallel to the highway... He believes Smith and Clair may have been in on the skyjacking together. He notes that Clair, who spent his career in relatively low-level jobs, retired in 1973 when he was just 54 years old.

Several incriminating coincidences were noted by an article this week in the Oregonian -- including a scar on Smith's hand, his visit to a skydiving facility in 1971, and Smith's strong resemblance to the police artist's sketches. Even the chemicals found on Cooper's clip-on tie in 2017 would be consistent with his job as the manager of a railyard. "[I]n my professional opinion, there are too many connections to be simply a coincidence," the data analyst told the FBI, while telling the Oregonian he believes the pair were "mad at the corporate establishment" in America and determined to do something about it.

"If I was on that plane, I wouldn't have thought he was a hero," he says. "But after the fact, I might think, 'OK, this took balls,' especially if I knew he was an ordinary guy, a working man worried about his pension going away. That he wasn't some arch-criminal. I would want to talk to that guy.... he is a kind of folk hero."

111 comments

  1. It was by JustOK · · Score: 1

    It was Big Foot.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
    1. Re:It was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a movie to promote.

  2. It was Elon Musk by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    He's already been outed as Santoshi but his real alias is DB cooper. He used all the money on plastic surgery and height change operations. Now he's undermining cities.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:It was Elon Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's already been outed as Santoshi but his real alias is DB cooper. He used all the money on plastic surgery and height change operations. Now he's undermining cities.

      So it was Bezos all along. Lock him up! Lock him up! Lock him up!

  3. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Surely you woosh, Mr Q?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  4. Need more direct evidence by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There were 209 million people in the US in 1972. Finding one of them who circumstantially could conceivably within the realm of possibility have known someone who circumstantially could conceivably have been D.B. Cooper is not a hard thing to do. There needs to be direct evidence connecting them for this to be newsworthy. Also, saying that the rare earth metals ending up on his tie because he was a rail yard manager is a huge stretch. In that case, assuming he left his office and went frolicking around inside of rail cars, he might have had one kind of rare earth metal. However the tie had multiple rare earths (cerium, strontium sulfide, pure titanium, etc) that indicate more of a production type facility (Boeing has been mentioned) where numerous rare earths are collected together in a single place.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Need more direct evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about threading a needle from miles away

    2. Re:Need more direct evidence by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      It's not rare earths. It's metal alloys. and the actual article lays out a lot more coincidences in recently released evidence and the book. FOr example, Cooper is suspected of learning skydiving outside Los Angeles, and so did the suspect. In the book cooper has an ad placed in the village voice wishing his wife well on her birthday. The ad happened and his wife has that birthdate. So there are some mounting coincidences. But nothing solid.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    3. Re:Need more direct evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There needs to be direct evidence connecting them for this to be..

      ..conclusive? Oh, certainly, I agree. That goes without saying.

      ..newsworthy

      Oh. Hmm. Let me check something.

      Some of the things that are "newsworthy" today are: someone has run some Intel and AMD benchmarks, Stevie Nicks recalls Prince's surprise appearance on a TV show, someone covered "Bohemian Rhapsody" is an unusual style, someone made a compilation of surfers wiping at a recent surfing event, the Democratic party has disgraced president Trump to thank for America voting bluer than it has in many decades, a couple people got run over by a train, people are making fun of yet another stupid utterance from the aforementioned disgraced president, things have gotten worse for the Norwegian warship that was in the collision a while back, cops shot someone in my town last night, there's a business where people will grocery shop for you and the professional shoppers are pissed about their low pay, Steve Carell was on SNL last night and supposedly was in some funny skits, and many more mundane things.

      Now let me get this straight: last night's SNL skits are newsworthy, but an unconfirmed DB Cooper identity hypothesis isn't, right?

    4. Re:Need more direct evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I ever commit a crime, I'll make sure some completely irrelevant dust left behind contains Cerium and perhaps Barium and Lead. The more myopic investigators will assume I had been lens grinding right before commiting the deed. I'd be off the hook since they couldn't prove I knew anything about the subject.

      The more experiened investigators may assume it's irrelevant or an attempt to throw off the team so maybe I'll go back to being an honest citizen and forget the idea.

  5. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have edited the wiki page to reference "skyjacking" for you... Just kidding.. but you know anyone can edit wikipedia right? it isnt really a "definitive" source.

  6. North By Northwest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By the way, this is why the Hitchcock film North By Northwest is called North By Northwest. In the film, they fly on Northwest airlines. It's in the bloody film. Right after the auction house scene, the police take him to the airport. Northwest ticket counter, Northwest planes. It was product placement.

    They didn't fly North though.

    1. Re:North By Northwest by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      It was, for it's time, a very kinetic film with a frantically moving character constantly being transported in cars, trains, planes and running on foot. It starts in NY, goes to chicago, then south dakota, then alaska. So North by way of north west.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  7. Oh really? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    naming two now-dead men in New Jersey who have never before been suspected

    If nobody suspected them how come they're dead?

    [looks around nervou$kljl@#$ o;
    no carrier
    ]

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had some dirt on Hillary.

    2. Re:Oh really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While I love the 'no carrier' schtick, remember that the sub-30 something children amongst us probably have no idea what the hell you're talking about...

      Wait, Toto, don't bite into that electrical wir@#&$^NO TERRIER

  8. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Skyjacking is a specific term that came into use in the 1960s to describe the rash of airplane hijackings that occurred in the late 60s and 70s. I count 20 skyjackings that involved the United States in just the decade of 1970. It is a specific type of hijacking that involves airplanes, and which typically takes place while the plane is in the sky during flight. Thus the plane is redirected to some other destination because the risk of the threat being real must be taken seriously.

    I presume you are in your 20s to have not encountered this word, which is defined in pretty much every English dictionary there is. If you prefer "A hijacking that occurs on an airplane while the plane is in flight" over "skyjacking" then feel free to use the longer phrase in your writings and conversation. However your lack of exposure to this word hardly makes it "tabloid-headline made-up".

    To totally beat this point to death, here are some various dictionary entries.
    https://www.merriam-webster.co...
    https://dictionary.cambridge.o...
    https://en.oxforddictionaries....
    https://www.dictionary.com/bro...
    https://www.thefreedictionary....
    https://www.macmillandictionar...

    I also note that the Chome spellchecker knows this word by default as well.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  9. Military? But.... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

    How does a "military background" demonstrate an ability to jump out of an airliner?

    My father put 25 years in the Army. I think he may have done Jump School before I was born. Maybe. Probably not, but it's possible.

    I was in the Navy. As was my brother. Neither of us ever got farther off the ground than the top of the Sail, except to fly as passengers on a civilian airliner across the Atlantic.

    So, while an Air Force background might suggest an ability to skydive (most Air Force types never get in the air, except to be passengers on a civilian airliner across the Atlantic or Pacific), Navy background suggests no such thing (unless you're a Navy Pilot)....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  10. It's why the airport has metal detectors by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Long before the TSA. Too many detours to Cuba. Then we all got metal detectors.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:It's why the airport has metal detectors by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      And to honour all the victims, we take off our shoes.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re: It's why the airport has metal detectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And get our balls fondled. (Sometimes I go through the lineup twice.)

    3. Re: It's why the airport has metal detectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, that's exactly what america needs. More idiots with more guns. Practically mathematically provably!

    4. Re: It's why the airport has metal detectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where's your statistics detailing how many lives are saved by people, not police, shooting criminals again?

    5. Re:It's why the airport has metal detectors by PPH · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No. Then we had 9/11. No more "Just sit back and cooperate. We'll drop these guys off in Cuba and be back on our way." Now, if anyone acts up, the passengers will kill them.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:It's why the airport has metal detectors by zieroh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like school shootings, skyjackings are the result of our over 25,000 gun laws that disarm the "good guys" and don't do anything at all about bad guys with guns.

      No, skyjackings are (or mostly were) the result of the fact that it was easy to get a gun onto a plane. When the metal detectors went up, the rash of skyjackings stopped, up until 9/11. Someone figured out that box cutters could be almost as effective as guns, and airplanes almost as effective as missiles, at least in that limited context.

      As others have noted, post-9/11 there's no way that a couple guys with box cutters will ever succeed at that again. The passengers of Flight 93 demonstrated to the world that a plane full of passengers can easily overcome dipshits with box cutters. And since then, we've seen proof of that countless numbers of times -- passengers will in most circumstances unite against a hijacker, even if it means losing their own lives.

      But you want supposed "good guys" to carry guns on planes? No. People who believe that kind of pro-gun claptrap are the same people who promote stupid conspiracy theories, grow neckbeards, and live in their mother's basement. Oh, and they are probably AOL users, too.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    7. Re:It's why the airport has metal detectors by rally2xs · · Score: 0, Troll

      Skyjackings were the result of the general prohibition of ordinary law abiding citizens bringing guns onto planes, although it wasn't as effectively enforced as it is now. Sooo... the bad guy was still the only one on the scene with a gun, and the planes went to Cuba. Repeatedly. Again, its the frickin' rules that did it,

      A couple guys with box cutters cannot now get the airplane to crash into a building, but they can still take it out of the sky like they did Flt. 93. If citizens were able to fight back, in other than a suicidal offensive, they wouldn't even be able to do that.

      All these gun laws are pointless, as the more of them they make, the WORSE things get, not better. School shootings and mass shootings are all the result of good citizens being rendered helpless when 1 evil gun is present. These laws should all be repealed.

      Here's the conspiracy theory - all these laws go in one direction, toward the eventual confiscation of privately owned firearms. A California Democrat politician proposed confiscation just last week, and one of the California Senators, Feinstein or Boxer, not sure, said it sort of under her breath a few years ago - "If it were up to me, I'd say, "Turn 'em all in, Mr. and Mrs. America." " And its not a theory, it is real.

      The ultimate thrust is that someone who is trying to disarm you is attempting to do something to you, not something for you. The historic result of confiscations has been genocide and slavery. Its happened twice already in America, just ask the Indians and the blacks under Jim Crow. We "conspiracy theorists" are determined that it is not going to happen again. And if you want a for-real shooting war, just try and take our guns. Molan Labe, motherfucker.

      As for who the conspiracy theorists are, some of us are retired DoD who worked on weapons software and own the basements we may choose to live in, or not, and have never had AOL.

    8. Re: It's why the airport has metal detectors by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      EH? There are mountains of statistics that show this. Here's one, from the decidedly non-gun friendly CDC, that was commisssioned and then ignored by President Obama that summarized thusly "As to defensives uses of guns, the CDC report said, "Studies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was 'used' by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies. ... Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million per year, in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008."

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    9. Re:It's why the airport has metal detectors by quenda · · Score: 1

      The real solution to both skyjackings and school shooting is to simply repeal all the gun laws, and let the good guys go armed in public.

      Have you never seen a Hollywood Western?

    10. Re:It's why the airport has metal detectors by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      I've seen Bugs Bunny cartoons, they're are real as Hollywood Westerns.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    11. Re: It's why the airport has metal detectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need to line up again, just shout out "Hey can you do that again i was enjoying that".

    12. Re:It's why the airport has metal detectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      DB Cooper didn't stand up and announce he was hijacking the plane. He passed a note to the flight attendant, then showed her the bomb inside is suitcase. It's quite likely that none of the passengers knew he was the hijacker at the time. Even if one of them were armed and knew who the bad guy was, hopefully they would be smart enough to hold their fire and not risk shooting an innocent person or detonating the bomb.

      In your imagination 9/11 is stopped because they good guys with guns stop the bad guys with box cutters. But in reality the bad guys would also have had guns, and in combat it can be hard to tell who're the good guys and who're the bad guys when there are no flags or uniforms. Say the hijacker is holding the flight attendant hostage. I shoot at him but hit the flight attendant. You also have a gun, and now you need to decide if I'm a good guy because I was trying to shoot the hijacker or if I'm a bad guy because I shot the flight attendant.

      To go back to the school shooting, remember that some schools already have armed guards. Columbine's Deputy engaged the shooters and missed. Parkland's Deputy never even engaged.

      Ultimately, I'm afraid more guns means more shooting and more gun deaths. I hear all the time about accidental deaths caused by people who should know better, like the FBI agent whose dancing caused his weapon to fall onto the floor and discharge, hitting somebody. Or the toddler who found his mother's gun and shot her in the back.

      And you hear all the time about cops with itchy trigger fingers who shoot people that clearly pose no threat to them. Imagine you're the good guy with a gun defending against the bad guys with guns, when the cops roll up. How do you expect them to know that you're not one of the bad guys? They could just see that you have a gun and shoot you because they're worried you'll shoot them. You may think you're safe because you're white and the cops only shoot innocent black people, but in reality the media is biased so you only hear about when blacks get shot by cops.

      So more people carrying guns means more accidental deaths, more people being killed by cops, and of course far more irresponsible (drunk/crazy/violent) gun users endangering everybody.

      dom

    13. Re:It's why the airport has metal detectors by Slayer · · Score: 1

      My home country has mandatory military draft for men, so most men at the age of 18 have to go through medical examination to check their fitness for service. Of these men, about 10% are excluded due to mental issues. Yes, these examiners know well, that most folks want to dodge draft, so typical scams to fake medical issues don't go very far.

      Think about it: 10% unfit for military service for mental reasons, and this is young people, not very old people with their own set of problems. Are you 100% sure you want to arm each and every one of these?

    14. Re:It's why the airport has metal detectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for who the conspiracy theorists are, some of us are retired DoD who worked on weapons software and own the basements we may choose to live in, or not, and have never had AOL.

      Are you also having marital problems and desperately trying to get home to your son's birthday party? What does the license plate on your vee-hic-cle read?

      Korean grocery, motherfucker!

    15. Re:It's why the airport has metal detectors by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Do I want to arm them? No. Do I believe that any attempt to keep them from being armed short of incarceration is futile? Yes.

      OK, they're unfit for military service, but they're fully permitted to get behind the wheel of a 4000 weapon which is the terrorist's newest weapon of choice, a weapon that can be made to drive down a sidewalk and kill multiple people, and the only defense those people might have could be to turn around and put a bullet in his brain before he can run them down. So I want those potential victims to have a chance. Making laws to tell them they have to go forth as prey I believe to be wrong, and the root cause of much of our current mischief. Repeal all the gun laws. Maybe pay a little more attention to exactly who is allowed to run free among us. But just don't make most people into helpless victims.

    16. Re:It's why the airport has metal detectors by rally2xs · · Score: 2

      "Say the hijacker is holding the flight attendant hostage. I shoot at him but hit the flight attendant."

      Your fault for taking a shot like that without being a certified expert marksman. What you really do is shoot the SOB from behind, which in a large population of potentially armed defenders, the bad guy cannot neutralize. Or he's standing right beside you as he's holding the stewardess hostage, and you put one up thru his ribcage and right into his heart from 6 inches away.

      "Ultimately, I'm afraid more guns means more shooting and more gun deaths."

      As Ghandi said, "Fear is the enemy. We think it is hate, but it is fear." We do horrific things because we are afraid, and disarming victims is one of them. Yes, there will undoubtedly be mistakes from time to time, but contrast that with a mental case with a couple semiauto pistols wading thru Virginia Tech and killing 32 innocents, and then himself. I have a friend who is an ex-Army Ranger, of college age at the time, who if he had been armed in one of these classrooms, the gunman would not have gotten a second shot, as this guy is absolutely deadly with any kind of firearm.

      "To go back to the school shooting, remember that some schools already have armed guards. Columbine's Deputy engaged the shooters and missed. Parkland's Deputy never even engaged."

      Columbine's 2 cops were cops, doing cop-things, and not where they needed to be, which was inside the school. One was out in the parking lot, and engaged the shooters from a distance without effect. The other was out running radar near the school, making revenue from the city but not protecting the students inside the building. And some of the problems with armed guards in schools that armed citizens in schools don't have are that everyone who is a potential shooter knows who to shoot first since they are wearing a uniform, there are always too few of them because they are expensive, they have other interests that can occupy their attention to the detriment of their ability to assist when a shooter does appear (like being gone, running radar to make the city some $$$$). Armed citizens in the schools do not have these problems - potential attackers have no idea how many enemy guns there are, who has them, and from which direction a defense will be mounted, nobody has to pay them to do it, and they have no reason to be anywhere else but inside the school where they may be needed to return fire should it occur.

      "And you hear all the time about cops with itchy trigger fingers who shoot people that clearly pose no threat to them. Imagine you're the good guy with a gun defending against the bad guys with guns, when the cops roll up. How do you expect them to know that you're not one of the bad guys?"

      Very easy. Cops, because they are good guys with rules, are required to shout, "Police, drop the gun" and you do it because you're the good guy. That's how they know. The bad guys will likely turn and attempt to fire at them, which is how they know that those people are the bad guys. Of course by the time the cops get there, you've already defended the kids and the perp is lying there bleeding, and you've reholstered your weapon anyway and probably giving the perp some 1st aid if you've gotten control of your hate for his attempt to harm your students.

      "So more people carrying guns means more accidental deaths,"

      Pure conjecture unsupported by reality.

      " far more irresponsible (drunk/crazy/violent) gun users endangering everybody."

      A fantasy propagated by the idea that somehow gun control laws work. Again, gun control laws only affect good guys. If this potential drunk / crazy / violent guy is a bad guy, he's going to have a gun if it pleases him to have a gun. The bad guys are bad guys because they ignore laws, and make no exception for gun laws. If they want to be armed, the will be. The only thing gun laws do is to create helpless victims. They should all be repealed.

    17. Re: It's why the airport has metal detectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No ulterior motive here, just adding some anecdotal evidence. Here in Birmingham, AL a couple or three weeks ago, a guy walked into a McDonald's and opened fire. Witnesses at the drive thru window reported hearing eight or nine shots, then a pause, then two more shots.

      Inside the restaurant, when the masked individual walked in and opened fire, a customer with a gun returned fire, killing the gunman.

      https://www.cbsnews.com/news/birmingham-mcdonalds-shooting-father-shoots-and-kills-masked-gunman-who-opened-fire-at-alabama-restaurant/

      No statistics, no grand claims, just a recent incident that actually made the news. For what it's worth, the masked gunman was arrested earlier in the year for possession of drugs and carrying a pistol without a license, but he participated in a program aimed to reduce recidivism...

      "Because of his compliance and dedication in our program, we are happy and eager to reportthat Mr. Sanders has demonstrated a propensity of progressive success and law-abiding citizentry," reads a letter to the judges in Sanders' cases. "When our nation formulates plans to reduce recidivism and enable second changes, Antonio Sanders' post incarceration journey is the example all similarly situated participants should emulate."

      Oops.

      It's not a failure of the program. It's not the fault of the gun. It's a broken person who planned to do a horrible thing and was stopped by someone who had the ability to do so.

    18. Re:It's why the airport has metal detectors by Slayer · · Score: 1

      Yes, a few terrorists caused some mayhem by slamming cars into crowds of people. No, a few simple hand guns would not have changed that, quite to the contrary. There would be general lack of situational awareness towards people suddenly opening fire at a car. Casualty count would have likely increased by an order of magnitude in every single one of these terror acts committed by car. Do not underestimate the amount of friendly fire, if hundreds of unprepared but well armed people are suddenly confronted with gun shots, screams, blood and panic. Add a bunch of gun crazy nutcases to this mix, who think they'll turn into today's heroes by shooting at whatever they think is a threat, and you'd have a bloodbath with every other traffic accident.

      And yes, police often stops aspiring criminals in their tracks, when these people try to arm themselves. Note, that this only works, if possession of a firearm is already limited to people with a proven legitimate need for one. BTW, people with mental issues are frequently denied a full driver's license, that's what keeps most people honest during these military examinations - they'd rather serve than lose their driver's license.

    19. Re:It's why the airport has metal detectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Very easy. Cops, because they are good guys with rules, are required to shout, "Police, drop the gun" and you do it because you're the good guy. That's how they know. The bad guys will likely turn and attempt to fire at them, which is how they know that those people are the bad guys.

      Ah yes. So if I ever "go bad", I'll remember that. Someone else with a gun? Just shout "Police, drop the gun!". If he does, he is a good guy and then I shoot him because I'm bad. Fun while it lasts.

    20. Re: It's why the airport has metal detectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol tried to look smart but you think 'thusly' is a word.

    21. Re: It's why the airport has metal detectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We take that ten percent and make them cops.

  11. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Informative

    Skyjackers are why we have airline security checks. Before that people just drove to the airport and got on airplanes. Airliners used to get hijacked *all the time* back then. There was a Monty Python bit where a man hijacks a bus and orders it to take him to Cuba, for example. But it's gone down the memory hole today, as you point out. There were also a bunch of left wing terrorist groups that bombed buildings and planted bombs on airliners and there been completely forgotten as well.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  12. Re: WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod this guy up!

  13. Railroad Retirement by McGruber · · Score: 4, Informative
    The summary says:

    notes that Clair, who spent his career in relatively low-level jobs, retired in 1973 when he was just 54 years old..

    Retiring at 54 from a railroad was not unusual back in the 70s -- it is one of the reasons Penn Central and other US freight railroads all went bankrupt!

    Railroad employees pay into the Railroad Retirement system (instead of Social Security), which provides really good retirement benefits. At age 54, he could have had 30 years of service if he had started at the railroad in 24 (after having served in the military.) Having been in "relatively low-level jobs" would mean he would have been earning overtime -- getting paid 1.5 times his hourly rate for every hour he "worked" over 40 hours. He was working in a heavily unionized industry, where overtime is handed out based upon seniority, so staying in "low level jobs" often made more financial sense than going into management.

    1. Re:Railroad Retirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Furthermore, the DB Cooper money has never been spent! Aside from the bundle of cash found in 1980, none of it has surfaced in the monetary system. Kind of tough to retire if you never spent the cash.

    2. Re: Railroad Retirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, that's probably the best proof that he died during or after the jump.

    3. Re:Railroad Retirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove it
      or
      STFU
      .

    4. Re: Railroad Retirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hasn't some of the money been found, along with the parachute? I can't keep these distractingly interesting although currently irrelevant stories straight.

    5. Re:Railroad Retirement by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You imagine the equipment and personnel to record serial numbers of bills passing by were common back then. Let me give you a hint, as someone who was there...no, it wasn't. Especially not in other countries that use the global currency that is the U.S. dollar.

      Only a fool would have spent the money near a large U.S. city

      A smart person would have laundered or spent the money elsewhere.

    6. Re:Railroad Retirement by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Boy, mass immigration sure put a stop to that, didn't it? Imagine, the deplorables benefiting from The System? The 60s and 70s sure were fucked up, weren't they?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Railroad Retirement by PPH · · Score: 1

      The ransom money was in $20 bills which are circulated rapidly. They wear out over time and odds are that within months or years, some would have made their way back to the Treasury to be retired. Wouldn't they be scanned at this point?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re: Railroad Retirement by PPH · · Score: 1

      Yes. Buried in a sand bank along the Columbia River.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    9. Re: Railroad Retirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There were no scanners in 1973!

    10. Re:Railroad Retirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong.

    11. Re:Railroad Retirement by lgw · · Score: 1

      Scanned? In the 70s? It was a very manual process back then, and one likely abandoned after a few years given the expense.

      It's also worth noting that some bills will sit in foreign bank vaults effectively forever, never returning to to US. IIRC it's something like 10% of physical currency (which is nice, since it's effectively a free loan to the US).

      One theory is that he crossed the border to Canada, and took a boat from somewhere in BC to whatever country he retired in. Of course, the real mystery for any theory that has him surviving is how the heck he planned to land safely and be recovered in the middle of nowhere in the Pacific Northwest in November. He had clearly done an amazing amount of planning, though, which opens to doors to a lot of wild theories.
       

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Railroad Retirement by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Of course, the real mystery for any theory that has him surviving is how the heck he planned to land safely and be recovered in the middle of nowhere in the Pacific Northwest in November. H

      Apparently he boarded a train like a hobo. I'm just saying that based on the summary.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    13. Re:Railroad Retirement by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      not in the early 1970s, didn't happen and wasn't done. Late 1980s is when it happened, way too late. 20 dollar bills last less than 8 years

    14. Re: Railroad Retirement by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      actually there were but not for currency. sending pictures over wire is *really* old tech, look it up. Fun fact, first "fax" was done over telegraph wire in mid 19th century.

      what we would call high res scanners weren't around until late 1980s,

    15. Re:Railroad Retirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy, mass immigration sure put a stop to that, didn't it? Imagine, the deplorables benefiting from The System? The 60s and 70s sure were fucked up, weren't they?

      Sarcasm isn't meant to be used by shitty little dime store fascists like yourself, because your real views are are also ludicrous and it's not really possible to tell the difference.

    16. Re:Railroad Retirement by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      You imagine the equipment and personnel to record serial numbers of bills passing by were common back then. Let me give you a hint, as someone who was there...no, it wasn't.

      Whether it was or wasn't common - the fact remains that criminals were traced and caught in that era using marked bills or serial numbers. Equally factual, is that the US Mint records the serial numbers of all the bills it destroys.

      So, that none have ever shown up in circulation or to be destroyed can be taken as evidence that it's highly likely that none was ever spent.

  14. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by quenda · · Score: 0

    I presume you are in your 20s to have not encountered this word,

    No, but not American. I just tried googling the 9/11 attacks, and every article I saw used the words "hijack" and "hijacker" not "skyjacker", so I still think "skyjack" is a bit of informal regional slang, or at least archaic by this century. Dictionaries contain a lot of obscure words with better alternatives.

  15. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "while the plane is in the sky during flight"

    As opposed to when it is on the ground during flight.

  16. wTF only $200,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notice how the summary conveniently leaves out the amount stolen? SO Trivial. Yeah yeah I know it was a "lot" back then, just goes to show that The real criminal here is inflation. One of those things people never question, just take it as a fact of life.

    1. Re: wTF only $200,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ssh. Don't kill the sacred cow of capitalism - perpetual growth.

    2. Re: wTF only $200,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The purchasing power of the US dollar has plummented over 50% in the last 10 years alone. Garbage currency.

    3. Re: wTF only $200,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama turned the US into a pastoral country.

    4. Re: wTF only $200,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily the minimum wage has kept up. Oh, never mind.

      Poverty level also totally out of whack.

    5. Re: wTF only $200,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in the supermarkets it hasn't. A gallon of milk costs less today than it did six years ago (roughly $2.50 today vs $4 six years ago)

      The only thing that's massively increased in cost in the last eight years is housing. The reason for that is that there was a massive collapse in housing prices in 2008, and prices have gone up since to their pre-collapse levels.

    6. Re: wTF only $200,000 by SpammersAreScum · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to https://inflationdata.com/, the CPI was in 207.342 in 2007 and 245.120 in 2017; that's an 18.22% increase over those 10 years, not the 100% you are claiming.

      Late 1971 is 40.900 and late 2018 is 252.885, a multiplier of 6.175, making $200,000 then worth $1,235,000 today.

    7. Re: wTF only $200,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is the ruble doing by the way? I won't bet dollars to rubles, that's for damn sure.

  17. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Interesting

    True, I didn't hear skyjacking used to describe the 9/11 flights either. The normal connotations of "skyjacking" are actually relatively peaceful, in that the motive isn't to kill everyone on board or weaponize the plane. Usually skyjackers wanted one of two things - to be flown to some other country, and / or money. They typically aren't suicidal, and typically do not actually intend on killing everyone on the plane or people on the ground. Many skyjackings were made with the mere threat of a bomb, or with something inert that looked similar to a bomb. I believe towards the end of that era the skyjackings did start to become more violent and innocent people started dying as officials began to crack down and upped the ante.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  18. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please speak English, not tabloid-headline made-up words.

    The hell are you talking about?

    Skyjacking is in every online dictionary I just checked, (4 of 4) and is also in the autocorrect dictionary for my web browser.

    It isn't not a word just because you don't know it.

  19. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 0

    I agree with the OP, Skyjacking is a stupid term. Someone is jacking the sky? WTF!

    Air piracy is probably a better term to use (but even that gives the wrong impression: air is being pirated?!) The best term is airplane hijacking -- due to its unambiguous and clear nature.

    I've never heard of skyjacking in 40+ years. The news has always reported this as hijacking as far as I've seen / heard / read.

  20. Re: WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a period of time, after you board your flight, where the plane is not in the air, and another period of time after it lands when the flight is on the ground.

  21. solid professional reputation by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not any more

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  22. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Informative

    “Skyjacking” came into use during those years as a newspaper headline term. Kids, ask your grandpa what a “newspaper” was.

  23. Re:WTF is "Air piracy"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Air piracy" sounds like something people will be charged with in the future, when they neglect to pay for the air they breathe. But no, "Air piracy" is not a better term to use at all.

  24. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I kept reading, waiting for an explanation

    You cannot be this dumb. I know, because you managed to type other real words into that post of yours.

    https://www.dictionary.com/browse/skyjacking

  25. Re: WTF is "Air piracy"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well since that is the actual federal crime in the US it is indeed the right word.

  26. You mean 5 paragraphs isn't enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you expect an unconnected 3rd party to collect and analyze DNA off the tie? Isn't that the official investigators responsibility? The government has the budget and tools to that.

    Face it, the fact that a random sleuth took things this far is nothing short of amazing!

  27. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by nukenerd · · Score: 4, Informative

    There was a Monty Python bit where a man hijacks a bus and orders it to take him to Cuba, for example.

    ... which comes at the end of a sketch (Here) where a man tries to hijack a plane flying to Cuba to divert it to Luton :-

  28. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by Martin+S. · · Score: 1

    Agreed, skyjacking is different to hijacking, but it a colloquial word of time.

    Skyjacking is essentially newspaper slang for robbery in the sky, like carjacking it is from jacking slang for robbery.

    While Hijack is not robbery based.

  29. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You never heard of it because you were a youngster and not paying attention to the TV news in the 70's.

    Grow up, fool.

  30. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, he can be that Dumb.

    The younger generations have been totally dumbed down, our society is lost.

  31. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by zieroh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I still think "skyjack" is a bit of informal regional slang, or at least archaic by this century.

    It's not informal, regional, or slang. It's a well-understood term for American English speakers. Even if it was obscure, the subject and the base words ("sky" + "jack") lend themselves to a very easy contextual understanding of the word for almost any English-speaker.

    I don't think this was really such a mystery for you. I think you just wanted to whinge.

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  32. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by zieroh · · Score: 5, Funny

    The best term is airplane hijacking -- due to its unambiguous and clear nature.

    That's excessively verbose, which is the enemy of effective communication in English. Try German, down the hall and to the left.

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  33. Re: WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... which is why 9/11 was successful... We assumed that the hijackers did not intend suicide and destruction, like past skyjackers

  34. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by lgw · · Score: 1

    I kept reading, waiting for an explanation, but not given, so googled DB Cooper (no link!?) and found out they mean "hijacking".

    Please speak English, not tabloid-headline made-up words.

    The important bit it: the term "skyjacking" was common at the time of DB Cooper's stunt and it was the word used to describe the incident when it happened.

    All words are made-up words, of course, but this one is well understood when describing this particular case. Much like the phrase "Jack the Ripper" was the creation of journalists of the time, but it's now the most-understood way to refer to that particular serial killer. The "DB Cooper skyjacking" is a similar phrase.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  35. Re: WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it is the same as jacking off.... Just in an airplane... Similar to the mile high club.... Just by yourself...

  36. Huge nose, looks nothing like the sketch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that was D.B. Cooper then one of the identity sketches would not have given him a pencil thin nose. He's got a massive schnoz, it's the dominant feature of his face. This is ridiculous, just another amateur pushing a theory where his suspect looks nothing like one of the sketches so he cherry picks the other sketch that closes the gap a but but still doesn't have the large nose. The FBI investigator Ralph Himmelsbach looks more like the sketches. I saw his photo and thought "hmm... maybe" then read the caption and scrolled down, only to find a guy who couldn't possibly be a match. It's a shame enthusiasts can't be a little more objective in their evaluations.

  37. Re: WTF is "skyjacking"? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

    There are also infrequent instances of aircraft being on the ground while in flight, that generally are rather brief moments.

  38. Another book coming along? by p51d007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems like every time there is a new book, article, documentary..."DB Cooper" pops up. Give it up. He's dead, probably has been for decades, that is if he even survived.

  39. Hijacking, but with an airplane by drnb · · Score: 1

    Hijacking includes robbery based, for example trucks having their cargo stolen. The term is not limited to hostage taking, political terrorism.
    Skyjacking is more directly derived from hijacking and predates the common use of carjacking.

    Skyjacking emerged in the 1960s/70s during a period of frequent airline aircraft takeovers by terrorists, not so much the commercially minded as in the DB Cooper case. Yet like hijacking the dual use, commercial and political terrorism, was well understood. Hijacking simply leaned towards the commercial, skyjacking simple leaned towards the political. The words are very closely related. Skyjacking was commonly understood as hijacking, but with an airplane.

  40. Re:Military? But.... by drnb · · Score: 1

    I think the military bit had to do with:
    * being able to plan
    * being trainable (ex the civilian parachuting school)
    * being somewhat risk tolerant
    * being somewhat able to overcome fear and complete a task

    Also the older former paratrooper could teach the younger former sailor about techniques for landing around obstacles, getting down out of trees, etc. Things not normally taught in civilian training.

    And then there is the likelihood that one veteran would see another veteran as a more trustworthy partner than a civilian, even with service in different branches.

  41. Flight 93 Was Shot Down By A F15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STOP PERPETUATING LIES.

    Cheney ordered it shot down. Bush was hiding in the toilet at that minute.

  42. Hows the weather in Odessa, comrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, it's Ivan Flambaitski

  43. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in case you hadn't noticed Americans like to redefine or replace English words they don't like,
    eg. Spyware is now called Telemetry
    extra-judicial killings = collateral damage
    civilian = illegal combatant
    Cannabis = Marijuana

    and so on.

  44. Re:Military? But.... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The US mil at that time gave smart people selected on merit access to repeated training needed to parachute into wilderness at any time of day.
    This was before Project 100,000 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... so the accepted US mil skill level, fitness and IQ would have been great for that generation.
    The FBI would have been all over any strange flight school and parachute clubs looking for people who did not fit into that decade of normal people doing normal "parachute" things.
    The mil then becomes alternative way to have learned a skill used and had the out door skills to escape on the ground.

    The "Navy" part is the open question for the slashdot US mil historians.
    Early special forces? Elite units?
    Someone who had to maintain and prepare Navy parachutes?
    "Navy" was early mil cover for a lot of over activity by other agency units?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  45. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by quenda · · Score: 1

    Much like the phrase "Jack the Ripper" was the creation of journalists of the time, but it's now the most-understood way to refer to that particular serial killer. The "DB Cooper skyjacking" is a similar phrase.

    Thanks folks. As suspected the word appears unique to American newspaper headlines of the period (1970s), and a movie title.
    It is clearer now to this confused foreigner. I guess the DB Cooper case, and attached term, must be a s famous in the US as Jack the Ripper elsewhere. But it is still not in common usage today.

    Wouldn't you be confused by an article that used "ripper" in place of "murderer"? Sure you get from the context that there was a murder, but be trying to figure out what specifically a "ripper" was. It would not be good writing.

    Even Fox News has high enough standards to use the proper word:
    https://www.foxnews.com/us/fre...

    Some other US sources use "skyjack" in the headline, but hijack afterwards.

  46. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by aberglas · · Score: 1

    I remember catching a short hall "shuttle" plane. No ticket. Walk up to the plane, hand put your luggage on a trolly, hop on board and find a seat. Plane takes off when full. And you pay on the plane itself. Quick and easy and cheap. Long forgotten now.

  47. James Klansnic by Derek_Godsey_7 · · Score: 1

    Boeing Engineer and Manager James Klansnic was the elusive hijacker Dan âoeDBâ Cooper. Come on and use your head people. A guy from jersey would risk jumping into unfamiliar territory at night and walk all the way back with the money to jersey? You can do your own research on this but the pilots flying the plane that night didnâ(TM)t know the aft stairs could be deployed during the flight, but Cooper did. Some railman from jersey knew this? James Klansnic was DB Cooper ifounddbcooper.wordpress.com

  48. Re: WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called the "half mile high club".

  49. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They also act dumb when someone else uses a word that is different to the one they typically use. Meaning they don't even attempt to determine the meaning from context.

    Stupid Americunts.

  50. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the "hi" in "hijack" comes from "highway". So substituting "sky" for it isn't weird at all.

  51. Gah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The data analyst says the two men's military backgrounds -- Smith served in the Navy -- and long experience in the railroad business would have made it possible for either of them to successfully parachute from a low-flying jetliner, find railroad tracks once they were on the ground"

    That is the dumbest thing I have ever read.

    What exactly about Navy service would make him understand *sport parachutes*? If you're not familiar with this issue, DB Cooper specifically requested a type of parachute known as a "Para-Commander" which was at that time the new hotness in sport jumping.

    http://www.parachutehistory.com/round/pc.html

    This was not a military chute, and it is not clear how Navy service would suggest he knew anything about *any* chutes, let alone sport models.

    "he would have been no more than 5-to-7 miles from tracks."

    5 to 7 miles, at night, and in a forest. Is this guy serious? You can't see a rail line at 100 yards at night in a forest. I know, we had one in our back yard (literally):

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto_Eastern_Railway

    "Then there's his theory about the "grudge""

    Yeah, his company went bankrupt. Like thousands of others.

    "The researcher acknowledges he could be wrong about all of this"

    Indeed.

    This guy's next book will be on Emilia I'll bet.

    1. Re: Gah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the same thing reading it at first. But itâ(TM)s two separate comments. No one believes you learn parachuting while working on the railroad.

      âoeThe data analyst says the two men's military backgrounds -- Smith served in the Navy -- and long experience in the railroad business would have made it possible for either of them to successfully parachute from a low-flying jetliner, find railroad tracks once they were on the ground...â

  52. Re:WTF is "Air piracy"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I paid my air tax. I'm behind on my carbon-dioxide disposal fees, though.

  53. Re:WTF is "skyjacking"? by q4Fry · · Score: 1

    And the "hi" in "hijack" comes from "highway".

    This is intuitive, but wrong. It comes from the instructions given to carriage-drivers by the robbers: "Hold 'em up high, Jack."

  54. Re: WTF is "skyjacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is intuitive, but a baseless folk etymology. It most probably comes from a term for zinc ore, and the miners who stole it (Cohen 1989).

  55. Re: WTF is "skyjacking"? by Lazyhound · · Score: 1

    This is intuitive, but a baseless folk etymology. It most probably comes from a term for zinc ore, and the miners who stole it (Cohen 1989).