Slashdot Mirror


Apple Finally Signs A Big Deal With a Hollywood Movie Studio (washingtonpost.com)

"And the winner of the 2021 Academy Award for best picture is .â.â. Apple?" jokes the Washington Post, noting that Apple has just signed a new multi-year movie deal with film production company A24, "and while that seems like a comparatively minor announcement, it could change the game in some significant ways." It's sneakily consequential. A24, if you're not familiar, is the boutique New York outfit that has been responsible for a slew of hipster-approved, Academy Award-recognized films including "Lady Bird," "Moonlight" and "Room." Since its founding six years ago by a trio that includes the former partner of late Beastie Boy Adam Yauch, it has located commercial success and downtown cool. Its movies are handmade hipster-fests that also often manage to please audiences: In addition to its big three, they include "Hereditary," "Eighth Grade," "A Ghost Story" and "Ex Machina". Welcome to the party, Tim Cook....

For Apple, cachet is everything. And it needs that now. A company that has prided itself on cool has reason to be worried about sustaining that on the entertainment side, with Netflix swiping its video lunch and Spotify some of its music swagger.

That with major competitors like Amazon already producing its own films, Apple, "had to do something..." They add the Apple's announcement "contained about as many details as the iPhone 7 has headphone jacks."

But "Even without those specifics, the significance was clear. Apple is installing itself as a producer of some of the most-acclaimed films around, all without needing to take a single meeting or read one script off the slush pile first...."

27 of 62 comments (clear)

  1. Finally? by rally2xs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I mean, with damned near every computer in every movie I've seen over the last 10 - 15 years having an apple logo on it, you mean that "just happened" and wasn't the result of some big product placement contract?

    1. Re:Finally? by Solandri · · Score: 5, Informative

      Macs are used heavily in the video and audio production industries. Apple started off catering to artists*, so they work to make sure OS X fully supports color profiles (the Macbook Pro screens are even color-calibrated at the factory). Unlike Windows which still has a color profile bug dating back to Vista (a UAC elevation popup which dims your desktop will dump the current color profile). And OS X is based on Unix so doesn't suffer as many audio dropouts as Windows used to, making it the preferred platform for sound sampling. So Macs tend to be overrepresented in what these people produce - movies, videos, DJing. When a scene calls for a laptop, these people will usually just grab whatever is most easily available, which is usually a Macbook.

      Apple also offers its products for free for use in movies. They take em back after, but it helps if your production's prop budget is limited.

      If you walk into any other business, 99% of their computers run Windows. That said, OS X has managed to claw above 10% market share in recent years.

      * This is also why Macs got high-PPI "retina" screens first. Page layout artists also predominantly use Macs. Subpixel rendering, which basically triples the horizontal resolution without requiring new hardware, was introduced with Windows XP (ClearType). So Windows didn't need high-PPI to produce high-quality fonts. But subpixel rendering requires you to align the fonts to the subpixel grid. That's unacceptable for page layout work, where having the font appear where it'll actually appear when printed is more important than how sharp it looks on the screen. Consequently, OS X didn't use subpixel rendering (If you plugged a 1024x768 or 1280x800 monitor into a Windows PC, then a Mac, the Windows PC was noticeably sharper). OS X fonts are blurrier, but they're placed more accurately for page layout artists. The only recourse Apple had was to sharpen fonts was to switch to high-PPI displays.

    2. Re:Finally? by 605dave · · Score: 1

      OK I will tell you that wasn't paid for by Apple. Fun fact, paid product placement in a TV show is considered an ad and not allowed by the FCC. Paid placement in movies is quite common (looking at you Michael Bay). I don't know for sure that Apple doesn't pay for movie placement, but I remember a few years back reading about how they didn't have to because people used their products in films anyway.

      --
      Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a difficult battle. - Plato
  2. Acclaimed is not equal to good for movies by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    Just because the critics love a movie, doesn't mean anyone want's to see it.

    For the most part Academy Award winning films are something I avoid.

    If I want hard-hitting depressing reality, I'll go hang out at the bus terminal.

  3. "Finally" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Firs two thoughts:

    a) That "finally" in the title...is that supposed to infer somebody was *waiting* for this? I can't imagine who.

    b) Product placement's about to get even worse.

  4. Re: Expensive But Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I dont see apple being creative enough to produce movies. It will be boring since it cannot offend, push boundaries or stir emotions.

  5. Wtf slashdot by technosaurus · · Score: 1

    All links try to go to the following site with a bunch of personal info encoded: america.geignskkdkege.top/...

  6. If they're located in New York... by Nova+Express · · Score: 2

    ...then, ipso facto, they're not a "Hollywood studio," are they?

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:If they're located in New York... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Apple is installing itself as a producer of some of the most-acclaimed films around, all without needing to take a single meeting or read one script off the slush pile first....

      Then they're not a Producer.

      It's sneakily consequential. A24, if you're not familiar, is the boutique New York outfit that has been responsible for a slew of hipster-approved, Academy Award-recognized films including...

      This is just PR drivel. And no, it's not consequential.

      Call me when Apple secures another 6 months of streaming exclusivity for "Game of Thrones".

      Now, that will be consequential.

    2. Re:If they're located in New York... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Then they're not a Producer.

      In The Industry, a producer oversees the production of a film, often including finding projects. An Executive Producer is only involved in top level management and usually provides at least part of the funding. That's why you sometimes see films with several Executive Producers listed; everybody who chipped in to get the project filmed expects screen credit. I predict that Apple plans to be an Executive Producer, funding projects that they like, or fit into their current agenda, but not getting involved with day-to-day operations. Of course, they'll also expect a hefty share of the profits.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  7. They will be ... by PPH · · Score: 2

    ... the best since Bialystock and Bloom.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  8. Creative freedom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I hope A24 maintains creative control. I recall reading that Apple wanted "family-friendly" television shows on their new streaming service.

  9. How is Amazon a competitor? How is this new? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Amazon is only a competitor in terms of video because Apple has decided to enter the video space. They otherwise were not much of a competitor at all (except via Alexa).

    But really calling this any kind of new or turning point seems nuts, with both Netflix and Amazon producing high quality movies now with major starts regularly.

    Apple does not need "cachet" to succeed in video, they need CONTENT PEOPLE WANT TO WATCH. That is it. It is the secret to Netflix's success, and the reason why Amazon has had a harder time enticing video customers.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  10. Apple only distribution? I won't see it. by DogDude · · Score: 1

    If they distribute their movies via Apple gadgets only, I won't have any way of seeing them. I certainly wouldn't buy some Apple gadgets and give them my identity just to watch a movie, no matter how good it is. Same with Amazon. No matter what they put out, I'm not watching. Their loss.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  11. Apple needs to be cool by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's a major part of why folks pay so much for their hardware. You can't just buy product placement. That doesn't work unless you're selling a commodity (e.g. like how the cigarette makers put smokes in movies but generally didn't focus on a specific brands).

    Not sure if this'll work for them. It's hard to manufacture cool and when it fails it fails spectacularly. But that's what they're doing if anyone's wondering.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  12. About time! by thegarbz · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That with major competitors like Amazon already producing its own films, Apple, "had to do something..."

    No they really fucking didn't. This stupid me-tooism in tech is a cancer. I wish companies would stop adopting every shitty idea from their competitors and remember what they hell they are doing in the first place. I mean these guys are run by MBAs right? Did they fail their course?

  13. Re:Cant wait by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    But you won't be able to read them, because it'll mangle the punctuation & accented characters.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  14. .Ã.Ã. Apple?" by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    .Ã.Ã. Apple?" jokes the Washington Post, noting that Apple uses fancy soy-boy quotes, and Slashdot hasn't worked out how to either handle them or transform them to something it can handle, EBCDIC probably.

    FTFY.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. And the award for worst Unicode support goes to... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    .â.â.

    How many years is it now?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  16. Re:How is Amazon a competitor? How is this new? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Apple does not need "cachet" to succeed in video

    People will buy any old shit with an Apple logo on it, so they'll probably watch any old shit too.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  17. Re:How is Amazon a competitor? How is this new? by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    they need CONTENT PEOPLE WANT TO WATCH.

    exclusive content.

    That's what this is really about. Netflix, Amazon, CBS All Access, and now Apple - they're the new premium "cable" networks. Except now, you've got competing incompatible hardware platforms and separate bills for streaming all this shit. It might almost make you miss the days when you had a single cable bill and could watch everything you paid for from a single cable box.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  18. Vastly better by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I should have spelled it out but I figured it was implied this was all exclusive stuff since Apple was inking the deal...

    It might almost make you miss the days when you had a single cable bill and could watch everything you paid for from a single cable box.

    Not even close to missing that - because I can watch all of this from a single box (AppleTV can play HBO, Amazon Video, Netflix and Apple content) and I can easily break away from stations I do not need for a while. I subscribe to HBO maybe half a year for example, and then drop it for a while...

    Even with a few separate streaming bills the cost is way lower than cable, and way easier to manage what and when I subscribe. What we have going on now I feel like is a fantastic situation where you can get almost any service for a month at $10 and watch a ton of great content.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Vastly better by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Not even close to missing that - because I can watch all of this from a single box (AppleTV

      AppleTV can't directly buy/rent content from Vudu or Amazon. It might be the ideal solution for your use, but there still is no one-size-fits-all streaming box. And yeah, you're probably saving money but someone who wants sports channels, and Netflix & Amazon's exclusive content, and HBO, and CBS All Access, and Hulu without the commercials, etc... is probably spending more now than in the glory days of cable/DirecTV/Dish - and has more than one "box".

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  19. Still Vastly Better by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    AppleTV can't directly buy/rent content from Vudu or Amazon.

    So you have to go to Vudo or Amazon on a phone (which you'd have with you anyway), who cares? I had to activate CBS on Amazon once to watch a show, it took a minute.

    The important thing is that I can SEE the content via the AppleTV.

    And yeah, you're probably saving money but someone who wants sports channels,

    At this point any sport you would care to watch is also on AppleTV via apps, often with a fuller range of games you can watch than you could with cable.

    An actual baseball fan would be nuts not to prefer getting MLBTv and watching that way.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  20. Re:How is Amazon a competitor? How is this new? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    Gadgets with an Apple logo on them are very different from content that happens to have an Apple logo that streams by in the credits.

  21. Dead Steve Jobs weighs in by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Dead Steve Jobs to Tim Cook: "Do something!"

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  22. Great by temisbliz · · Score: 1

    wow, this is so cool. I can't wait.