Slashdot Mirror


Norwegian Company Plans To Power Their Cruise Ships With Dead Fish (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian: Waste fish parts will be used to power ships in a new initiative to use green energy for polluting cruise liners. The leftovers of fish processed for food and mixed with other organic waste will be used to generate biogas, which will then be liquefied and used in place of fossil fuels by the expedition cruise line Hurtigruten. Hurtigruten operates a fleet of 17 ships, and by 2021 aims to have converted at least six of its vessels to use biogas, liquefied natural gas -- a fossil fuel, but cleaner than many alternatives -- and large battery packs, capable of storing energy produced from renewable sources. Biogas can be generated from most forms of organic waste by speeding up and harnessing the natural decomposition process to capture the methane produced. Organic waste is produced by all food industries but is frequently disposed of in landfill, where it contributes to greenhouse gas emissions as it decomposes. Hurtigruten is currently building three new hybrid-powered cruise ships in Norway, to be delivered in the next three years.

103 comments

  1. Was it just me, or... by BitterOak · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was it just me, or did anyone else, when first reading this, say "What's a bioga?"

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    1. Re:Was it just me, or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it just me, or did anyone else, when first reading this, say "What's a bioga?"

      It's something that produces other biogas. Duh!

      Your mom and I knew that already.

    2. Re:Was it just me, or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bioga" is to Lutefisk as "Calamari" is to Squid.
      Finally, someone found a use for lutefisk....

    3. Re:Was it just me, or... by BitterOak · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Bioga" is to Lutefisk as "Calamari" is to Squid. Finally, someone found a use for lutefisk....

      Well if you feed people lutefisk, they will produce TONS of biogas!

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    4. Re:Was it just me, or... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Wasn’t that a Raffi song - “baby bioga”?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:Was it just me, or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other day, creimer was making another water fountain video, when he slipped, and fell in, and a young kid pointed, and shouted, "Mommy wook! A bioga!"

      With, extra, commas.

    6. Re:Was it just me, or... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Was it just me, or did anyone else, when first reading this, say "What's a bioga?"

      Isn't that the guy from the new star wars?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    7. Re:Was it just me, or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I was hoping it would be the mighty harring, from chopper of trees to mover of boats.

    8. Re:Was it just me, or... by glenebob · · Score: 1

      Not "what's a bioga", but "what are bioga". Bioga is plural for a number of individual biog. Biogs is singular for a [semi-]autonomous group or community of biog. It is OK to ask "what are bioga", but be careful with such terminology as "what's the matter with you biogs", or "I'm on the prowl for some biog ass."

    9. Re:Was it just me, or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. If you look it up, you'll find that a bioga is very similar to a beluga, but somewhat smaller. The north sea near Norway hosts a large quantity of biogas.

    10. Re:Was it just me, or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It (bioga) is yoga for bisexuals, duh. Ayurvedic yoga got old, Hot yoga is passé, frozen yogurt is so 1990's, they needed something new. Something with pizzazz! Ergo, bioga!

  2. Hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seems like live fish could tow better

    1. Re:Hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah but getting the little harnesses on them would be difficult.

    2. Re:Hm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something's fishy. The Navy would never adopt this - you'd smell them coming a week in advance. Also: never find yourself downwind of a Norwegian ship, it might fart!

    3. Re:Hm by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      Nah, that's the easy bit, getting them to swim in the right direction would be difficult.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  3. Re: You people need to STOP BULLYING ME... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So sorry. Move on APK

  4. Does this have any possiblity of working? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Argh. Can somebody do the math of this? How much energy does it take to to power this vessel? How much energy can be produced per unit of time? How much energy to recovery the fish? What's the energy efficiency of recovery of energy?

    Normally I'd do a Fermi problem, but it doesn't even seem worth it. PURE PROTEIN has an energy density of protein is a little under 17 MJ/kg. Energy density of diesel is 48 MJ/kg. Looks like a fermentation process in involved, so the protein energy to about 8 MJ/kg.

    Meanwhile wood and coal have about the energy density of pure protein.

    Given that we don't make much use of wood and coal anymore (entirely biochemical processes, so therefore "green", supposedly) I call BS on this. This is a lie constructed for PR purposes to get the dumb gullible "media" that can't figure out the Skripal story in the UK is horse manure, to give out free coverage.

    1. Re:Does this have any possiblity of working? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

      It doesn't say which of their ships is being converted, so it's hard to say how much energy is required; but I think the important point is that the biogas is being produced, liquified, then used as fuel.

      It's not an onboard fish-guts-to-power arrangement; it's a ship converted to run on liquefied natural gas which is provided ready for use at the dock; at least some of which is supposed to be sourced from organic waste decomposition.

      That's vastly easier and more plausible. LNG is somewhat less dense than diesel; and requires more care in storage; but it's a perfectly viable fuel; and production of methane from organic waste is going to be easier and cheaper when you don't need something you can fit into a ship while leaving room for cargo and passengers. Landfills do it automatically when left to their own devices(though it's often not captured in these cases), there may be some arrangement that is preferred when methane, rather than waste disposal, is the goal.

      None of this is to say that they'll actually end up carefully accounting for how much LNG they burn and ensuring it is all sourced from organic fish heads rather than ordinary natural gas; but even if they cheat on that it'll be much nicer than bunker fuel.

    2. Re: Does this have any possiblity of working? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the use of sequestered CO2 (fossil fuels) the problem. If fuels are produced based on sequestering CO2 and other gases that contribute to warming using energy sources that do not produce said gases and burnt, then the net atmospheric gain will remain neutral, ignoring the pollution caused by burning shit

    3. Re:Does this have any possiblity of working? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that we don't make much use of wood and coal anymore (entirely biochemical processes, so therefore "green", supposedly) I call BS on this.

      You should call BS on a lot more things.
      Like the idea that use of wood and coal are anything similar when it comes to what is "green".

      Burning them both is perfectly fine from a "green" perspective as long as you grow as much as you burn.
      However, it is a lot easier to grow wood compared to coal.

    4. Re:Does this have any possiblity of working? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can somebody do the math of this?"

      I doubt the vessel can run on biogas alone. Perhaps biogas complements diesel power on this vessel in the same way hybrid cars capture kinetic energy from braking to help it become more fuel-efficient.

    5. Re:Does this have any possiblity of working? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      It's not an onboard fish-guts-to-power arrangement;

      You just ruined the plot of a futuristic eco-horror where the passengers kept going missing and no one ever arrived at their destination.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    6. Re:Does this have any possiblity of working? by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

      I'd wager that on modern diesel-electric ships with electric azimuth thrusters that LNG is the ideal fuel. The prime mover is basically a medium sized electric power plant that provides both power for the drives and the shipboard electrical consumption, and I'd wager they're using gas turbines which can then be spun at optimum efficiency.

    7. Re:Does this have any possiblity of working? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Why use dead fish instead of "clean coal"?

      If dead fish would actually work, then how about the president sign an executive order mandating that NASA's SLS be powered by dead fish?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    8. Re:Does this have any possiblity of working? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good lord. Suspecting that some ship may not be completely powered by biogas may actually not be full on idiot loon. But going full on idiot and trying to back of envelope disprove an ALREADY WELL USED AND PROVEN PROCESS is just plain stupid. I mean really. WTF. All you have to do is quickly do a net search to discover the amazing and magical world of biogas. Well, the smelly and very real world of biogas.

      What's your going on about energy density? The gas is produced on land and the liquified gas is used on the boatd. It's even in the summary. Do you actually think they are going to produce the gas on the boat? Yeesh.

    9. Re:Does this have any possiblity of working? by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      that was my reaction too. The article headline made it out to sound as if the ship was running directly on fish waste, which would smell to high hell. By the time I finished the article I realized its no different than any other biofuel. Of course those same fish guts and fish heads used to get dumped into the ocean to quickly get consumed by the ocean ecosystem. If this were to expand in a much bigger capacity we would see a decline in ocean life populations since we arent returning some of the food stock back to the ocean.

  5. Re: Sir, Most of your post, by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    make little to no sense. Honestly Not trying to bully you. :) ok.

    --
    [($)]
  6. Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Instead of powering Norsk cruise ships to carry around the One Percent, wouldn't it be better to use those dead fish as fertilizer to grow food to feed the other Ninety Nine Percent?

    1. Re:Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Instead of powering Norsk cruise ships to carry around the One Percent, wouldn't it be better to use those dead fish as fertilizer to grow food to feed the other Ninety Nine Percent?

      Excellent question. I wonder if the decommissioned material could still be used as fertilizer. That might be a win-win.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by Misagon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hurtigrutten is not only a luxury cruise line. It is a major means of long-range transport for a long stretch of northern Norway, which consists mostly of a jagged mountainous coastline. It is the most dependable large-scale transport for many communities, carrying both cargo and people to places where planes, trains and trucks don't go.

      The dead fish is probably waste products from Norway's large fishing and fish farming industry. If you have ever eaten farmed salmon, it was probably from Norway.

      The world does not have a fertiliser deficiency. It has a problem of fertiliser distribution.
      Too much dung from meat production farms being dumped into the environment -- emitting greenhouse gases and getting into waterways killing the seas.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    3. Re: Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The 99% must die. The planet is overpopulated

    4. Re: Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 99% is now useless and its prolonged existence is a burden to the ecosystem. The sooner it disappears, the better. The Earth belongs to the Beautiful People, not the unwashed deplorable plebes.

    5. Re:Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Instead of powering Norsk cruise ships to carry around the One Percent, wouldn't it be better to use those dead fish as fertilizer to grow food to feed the other Ninety Nine Percent?

      Just move the 99% into the 1% and we can all be the 1%.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    6. Re: Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      The 99% is now useless and its prolonged existence is a burden to the ecosystem.

      Not if we recycle them as biogas for ships. We could use humans to heat our homes.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    7. Re:Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Calling it the "One Percent" just shows you've never been on a luxury cruise. It's by-n-large a cheap all expenses and cares paid for holiday when compared to actually travelling to multiple destinations, lodging and meals.

      We do it quite frequently. We're not the One Percent. Hell I think I'm barely scraping the 60th percentile.

    8. Re:Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      You REALLY think people that take cruises are all in the 1 percent. You really are a fucking idiot.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    9. Re:Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by jittles · · Score: 1

      The dead fish is probably waste products from Norway's large fishing and fish farming industry.

      What? All this time I was imagining a room full of aspiring chemists performing stoichiometry calculations. I tried to Google an example but apparently only my chemistry teacher has ever called them dead fish calculations. Oh well.

    10. Re:Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of powering Norsk cruise ships to carry around the One Percent, wouldn't it be better to use those dead fish as fertilizer to grow food to feed the other Ninety Nine Percent?

      Just move the 99% into the 1% and we can all be the 1%.

      You should run for Congress. You'd probably win in just about any blue district.

      Think I'm kidding?

      Newly minted Democrat/Socialist Congresswoman Occasional-Cortex (supposedly a economics major) doesn't know what the unemployment rate is.

    11. Re: Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      No. The 1% must die. The planet's resources are hoarded by a few.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    12. Re:Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Or you could just use the dead fish as SlashBait.

    13. Re:Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

      wouldn't it be better to use those dead fish as fertilizer to grow food to feed the other Ninety Nine Percent?

      No. We already have enough food to comfortably feed everyone. The issue is getting the food to the people.

      Also, no. It wouldn't be better because we already have too many people on the planet. If we could reduce the population by at least one quarter, that would go along way to your first issue.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    14. Re:Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      only a few things would consume dung. Fish heads and fish guts, however, would get eaten very quickly by a lot of ocean wildlife. I think of it much more as a food source than fertilizer. Its fertilizer only in the sense that it boosts a decent population growth of ocean animals. Small pieces of dead fish are a great bait for bigger fish.

    15. Re:Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not do both? It is the methane that is given off when this stuff decomposes that they are capturing and turning into LNG, but there will still be stuff left afterwards and that can probably be used as fertiliser.

    16. Re:Better to use the dead fish as fertilizer by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Instead of powering Norsk cruise ships to carry around the One Percent, wouldn't it be better to use those dead fish as fertilizer to grow food to feed the other Ninety Nine Percent?

      Just move the 99% into the 1% and we can all be the 1%.

      You should run for Congress.

      That's the point I was making.

      You'd probably win in just about any blue district.

      I would win red or blue.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  7. Dead fish are the future oil stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think of all of the oil that won't be there 50,000,000 years from now!

  8. They should hire me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I produce copious amounts of Biogas.

    1. Re:They should hire me by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      I produce copious amounts of Biogas.

      My dear friend, there is help.

      No, really.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:They should hire me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is that you APK?

  9. Re:Alt.question by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    What do you call the crew finding the stash of sardines near the galley of a Norwegian cruise ship?

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  10. Not modern landfills... by negRo_slim · · Score: 2

    Modern landfills are constructed in such a way to prevent things from decomposing. As that leads to all sorts of problems and can end up polluting the area and ground water. https://science.howstuffworks....

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    1. Re:Not modern landfills... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually no, MODERN landfills harvest the methane themselves to similar effect as the fish guts. That process inherently requires decomposition and is usually shielded properly from groundwater issues entirely. YMMV red states.

    2. Re:Not modern landfills... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Right on; Our Short Mountain Landfill (Lane County OR.) has gas collection and a small power plant. Leachate is a problem, but is collected and processed thru the local sewage treatment plant.

    3. Re:Not modern landfills... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Leachate isn't a problem in modern landfills. Leachate is PUMPED IN after being laced with enzymes that speed the decomposition. The biggest complaint from landfills nowadays is that there isn't enough organic material in the landfill, because the power generated has contributed to their budgets.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  11. Hashtag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #MeToo

    ZIP

  12. So they finally wised up? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    They’re gonna stop eating that abomination known as “lutefisk” and instead power their ships with it?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  13. So cruise passengers waste awful lot of food? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enough to power a cruise ship.

    1. Re:So cruise passengers waste awful lot of food? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Could this same principle be adapted to power SpaceX's BFR?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  14. Obligatory farewell as the ship leaves port: by rwyoder · · Score: 2

    So long and thanks for all the fish!

  15. Re: You people need to STOP BULLYING ME... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://m.slashdot.org/submission/8860808

  16. Re:question by quenda · · Score: 1

    I remember when it used to be conservatives who stereo-typically had no sense of humour and got offended easily.

  17. Really? Cool! by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

    It's a Ramjet for fish -- if you do it right.

    See? Science Fiction dreams DO come true! (Well, it's a start.)

    --
    If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
  18. Powered by dead fish? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

    Big deal. So is my cat.

    1. Re:Powered by dead fish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big deal. So is my cat.

      those crazy norwegians and their fish... I am surprised it is not DRIED fish

  19. As chicken is to chicken by raymorris · · Score: 1

    For those not into seafood, as chicken is to - uhm never mind.

    As pork is to pig.

  20. The reason by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    When asked why, the Captain replied, "Oh, we just did it for the halibut."

  21. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are "raunch" jokes? Is it like a salad dressing, perhaps?

  22. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "stereo-typically"

    What's with the hyphen? You realize that means typically in stereo, right?

  23. Guessing those will be by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    Vegan less ships?

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  24. Horizon Zero Dawn had those, didnt end well by citizenr · · Score: 1

    Faros Chariot line consumed biomass for fuel, outcome was less than favorable.
    http://horizonzerodawn.wikia.c... :

    "Apparently a fisherman in the Banda Sea captured video of a Hartz-Timor Horus unit refueling via biomatter conversion along the shoreline of Pulau Wetar. On a pod of endangered dolphins, no less, quite possibly the last of their kind. Not to get graphic, but it looks like what happens inside a blender, as if the robot was whipping up a big pink swirling milkshake of dolphin chum."

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  25. As opposed to Disney Cruises by orbit500 · · Score: 1

    which already use dead souls. Still, made me wonder if they tried live fish first. L

  26. Re:question by quenda · · Score: 1

    "stereo-typically"

    What's with the hyphen?

    I think I did it without thinking, to make the red squiggly line go away. Stoopid spellchecker.

  27. "Green" fuel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rather like 'biofuel', which is often wood pellets made from trees from rainforests, then shipped over to western countries, to be burnt in electricity generating plants. The stupidity of this is beyond belief - and all so a bunch of virtue signalling tossers can claim they are 'green'. Cutting down irreplacable rainforests, killing millions of animals, and enslaving thousands of indigenous people (by stealing their land). Sickening, isn't it.

  28. Gyo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's next, walking fish ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  29. Cut out the middle-man by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    The two main repeating themes of cruise liners are fire and diarrhea. Surely someone should be able to figure out how to extract work from either (or both) of these phenomena and power the ships directly?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  30. I would not like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would not like being the one feding the ship boilers.

  31. Would hate to be the mechanic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who has the job or maintaining these things! Potentially the worst job ever.

  32. In case of emergency... by OneSizeFitsNoone · · Score: 1

    In case of need I suppose it will be III class passenger's turn to be sacrificed for a higher good, the salvation of higher class passengers.

  33. Re:question by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    What are "raunch" jokes? Is it like a salad dressing, perhaps?

    Raunch dressing is the one with the fishy flavor, of course.

  34. Mod parent Russian troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > This is a lie constructed for PR purposes to get the dumb gullible "media" that can't figure out the Skripal story in the UK is horse manure, to give out free coverage.

    Nice try at slipping some lies and propaganda into an unrelated story, Vlad. We all know you're guilty, fuck, we even now know the names of your agents and where they grew up. You screwed the pooch on that particular chemical weapons attack on the UK and it's too late to turn it around with propaganda, worse, we even caught your cleanup squad red handed on the continent when they tried to hack into the OCPW.

    I know you're embarassed, but, well, there is a simple solution; don't pull shit like that when your nation is too inept to do it and pull it off.

    1. Re:Mod parent Russian troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is even more unbelievable than the Russian cover story for their agents, is that they thought anyone would actually believe it. Therefore we should conclude that Russia actually wants people to know they did it, but for diplomatic reasons won't outright admit they did. If they didn't want it traced back to Russia, they probably would have chosen a different poison.

  35. That's Nothing... by lobiusmoop · · Score: 1

    I heard there's a Hungarian company that will power hovercraft with eels.

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
  36. Horrible! by sad_ · · Score: 1

    I only want vegan electricity!

    https://www.ecotricity.co.uk/o...

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re:Horrible! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      +1

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  37. Clickbaity headline by Misagon · · Score: 1

    Gas made from food waste had been around in Scandinavia for some years now. It has powered mostly road vehicles: lorries and busses.
    What may be somewhat novel is that it is being used to power a cruise ship.

    And it does of course not need to be made from fish. Many types of organic material will do. It is just that food waste is widely available and people are willing to get it collected, they may even pay you for it.

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  38. So "progressives" are uptight stick-in-the-muds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So now Republicans are the party of dirty jokes and sex, while "progressives" are easily-offended, uptight, stick-in-the-mud busybodies hell bent on telling other people how to live their private lives?

    Guess I know who I'm voting for - I sure as hell don't need an emotional child telling me what I should be offended by.

  39. Why Is It...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Theoretically this is a good thing. It (cl)aims to be less wasteful and less polluting, though I suspect that fuel cost savings is the larger and unmentioned factor.

    None the less, the stream of disingenuous announcements and clickbait stories have left me wanting to shit all over this article.

    Why is this happening. Why is Slashdot and most other media turning me into an even more colossal cynic?

  40. I am not an animal rights activist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But harvesting millions of tons of fish to burn them as fuel seems sick to me.

    1. Re:I am not an animal rights activist by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, it's fish by-products and waste from the food industry!

      Although as a vegan, I find that as sick as directly using fish as cruise ship fuel.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  41. IMPERSONATING ME AGAIN? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gweihir KNOWS u IMPERSONATE me https://it.slashdot.org/commen... c6gunner proves it https://linux.slashdot.org/com... forgetting to SUBMIT BY AC & f'd up using his registered 'lusrname' instead (just because he tried to mock me both BEFORE & after I FAIRLY challenged him to show he's done better work - he had ZERO).

    & NO WAY I'd "cry" like you to "ne'er-do-wells" on /. (TROLL /.ers, not all) OR post on hosts offtopic.

    YOU HELPED ME https://science.slashdot.org/c... (& you quit trying to make me look bad trying to "tell lies" on hosts as "ME" IN YOUR IMPERSONATIONS of me e.g. https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... & regarding Intel speculative execution attack? Hosts DO PREVENT THEM)

    APK

    P.S.=> I KNOW that 2nd to last link above's KILLING YOU that YOU ACTUALLY HELPED ME getting me to see if hosts stop more than portsmash (& Meltdown + Spectre too) & "lo & behold" - hosts WORK on 'em - U LOSE (& U STOPPED TRYING IT in your impersonations of me) .... apk

  42. Emphatically not a fossil fuel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, biogas being made from recently deceased fish is not a fossil fuel. There never was a fossil.

    It is as much a fossil fuel as corn originated ethanol, regardless of any opinion one might hold on the worth of that process.

    Now it might be said to be compatible with fossil fuel natural gas in terms of its consumption in combustion engines but...

    Dale

  43. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An acceptable way to serve rollmops!

  44. Re:So "progressives" are uptight stick-in-the-muds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you changed your vote based on that, or are you just full of shit? Telling people how to live privately is different than the public face of the country. Sorry, nice try. Also, someone else having a problem with something isn't telling you what to be offended by.

  45. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember when it used to be conservatives who stereo-typically had no sense of humour and got offended easily.

    Still true.

    Heck, if anyone gets offended over anything then conservatives will get even more offended over someone else being offended and start shouting about snowflakes.

    Soon they will be offended over being criticized about being offended over someone else being offended about something.

  46. Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Gruaniad could power their web servers with dead fish, rather than begging for money from readers all the time.

  47. Re:So "progressives" are uptight stick-in-the-muds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a reminder, it was Tipper Gore (Al Gore's wife) that led the ban of rock music back in the 80's... history isn't what you remember it to be.

  48. Re:question by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    That is truly sad. I must be as old as you are.

    In other news, since when is using current waste products to generate biogas described as "fossil" in any way, shape, or form?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  49. Re:question by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    So, fish sauce?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  50. Black magic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was it just me, or did anyone else, when first reading this, say "What's a bioga?"

    It's the spell above Bio and Biora.

  51. Nitrogen by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Dead fish will also release nitrogen, where will that go? It is a usual pollution source from big farming.