Slashdot Mirror


Gap Looking To Close Hundreds of Stores at Malls 'Quickly and Aggressively' (cnbc.com)

Gap plans to "quickly" close hundreds of Gap-brand stores that are "dragging down the brand," the company told analysts on Tuesday. From a report: The retailer said Tuesday evening that it still has 775 Gap-branded stores globally, in addition to those under the Old Navy, Banana Republic and Athleta banners. Gap Inc. has more than 3,000 stores around the world. The namesake brand, however, has been the weakest unit of the company of late. In the fiscal third quarter, sales at Gap stores open for at least 12 months fell 7 percent, while those at Old Navy and Banana Republic were positive.

"There are hundreds of other stores that likely don't fit our vision for the future of Gap brand specialty store, whether in terms of profitability, customer experience, traffic trends," CEO Art Peck said Tuesday evening during a call with analysts. "The range from the very best to the very worst stores is extremely broad." Peck said that should the company "address" the bottom half of its fleet of Gap stores, it could contribute more than $100 million to earnings. He added the company is looking to make decisions about shutting stores "with urgency," including looking at closing some of Gap's "amazing flagships." "There likely will be a cash cost to exit many of these stores, which we will attempt to minimize," Peck told analysts. "But I plan to exit those that do not fit the future vision quickly. I'm going to move thoughtfully but aggressively."

12 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. News for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean, yeah, I get it, nerds wear clothes too, but so does almost everyone else.

    1. Re:News for nerds? by auximage77 · · Score: 2

      Came to post exactly this.. WTH does this have anything to do w/ tech?

    2. Re:News for nerds? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      So in 5-6 years when we need new pants because the ones our moms bought for us 10 years ago finally gave up the ghost, we will want to know. File it away... it might be important.

  2. "News for Nerds" by darkain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When was the last time anyone visiting this web site EVER shopped at a Gap retail store?

  3. OooooKaaaay, explain this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is this news for geeks and nerds?
    Do we have retail nerds here now?
    Is it because of Amazon and Bezos?
    Why am I asking rhetorical questions?
    Could it be that I've been infected by Slashdot's editors?

    1. Re:OooooKaaaay, explain this one. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Will all the replies to your comment be in the form of a question?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:OooooKaaaay, explain this one. by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 2

      Maybe?

  4. What are you wearing, "Jake"? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

    Uh...khakis.

  5. Who gives a shit? by jwhyche · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When did /. become yahoo home page? Who gives a shit if Gap closes?

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  6. Wha? by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is neither "News for Nerds" nor "Stuff that Matters."

  7. Hello Trump Recession! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Retail is the canary in the coal mine

  8. Re:Part of a pattern? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    I agree. There appears to be a bigger pattern going on: many brick-and-mortar stores are closing. I don't know if it will increase total unemployment, but it will be disruptive to millions of people, especially older people who have difficulty changing careers due to agism etc.

    It's argued the "Digital Revolution" is (or will be) as disruptive to society as the industrial revolution was. Somebody who had been farming for 3 decades had difficulty changing into a factory worker. Nobody really knows where the "new jobs" will be to replace the many lost to the The Web and factory bots.

    Trump is a symptom of this displacement anxiety. However, he blames it on outsiders instead of the real cause: tech-driven change.