Slashdot Mirror


YouTube is Testing Having Two Skippable Ads Back-To-Back (cnet.com)

If you hate having your video binging session on YouTube interrupted by multiple ad breaks, the good news is that things are about to change. CNET: The streaming platform is rolling out a new tweak to its video watching experience, by placing two skippable ads back-to-back, which it says will reduce the number of ad interruptions later in the video -- up to 40 percent less in a session, according to the company's blog post Wednesday.

86 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. Blocking Back-To-Back Ads by AHuxley · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ad blocking add-ons are testing blocking back-to-back ads.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re: Blocking Back-To-Back Ads by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      A load of what?

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    2. Re: Blocking Back-To-Back Ads by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      AIDS obviously

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    3. Re:Blocking Back-To-Back Ads by dohzer · · Score: 1

      Same for me I don't miss anything either. I love how YouTube saves it all so I can watch it later and not miss an episode. Hooray!

  2. Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I'd forgotten it ever did.

    1. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Iwastheone · · Score: 5, Informative

      Really, what are these 'ads on YouTube' that I occasionally hear of? I don't see them. Then again, AdBlockPlus, UBlock Origin and Privacy Badger seem to have something to do with it, methinks.

    2. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Never see them on a desktop but blocking them via phone is more difficult. I guess you could root your Android and add a hosts file.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    3. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Never seen one :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by helllllllloooo · · Score: 1

      I never see ads on the clips I watch. Yesterday I saw a special on Emily Dickinson, followed by a Mary Shelley biography. Not an ad in sight.

    5. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      Youtube streams the ads on Android so you can't block them with a hosts file or any other blocking software even if you wanted to. Just don't use the official client or use the web version.

    6. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      I didn't watch videos on the first desktop I ever used.

      I didn't watch videos on the second.

      Nor the third.

      The fourth was the first one that could run QuickTime. And the video was pretty bad, because while the screen couldn't fit in my hand, my hand could cover the video window.

      I don't want to watch video in my hand. This 15" laptop is a bit small for it.

    7. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I think there is an apk for that

    8. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Android TV is pretty good for set top boxes. I use a couple of nVidia Shields around the house, for paid streaming services, plus Kodi for locally stored content, and I can stream Steam games from the big rig in the office. And watch Youtube... unfortunately I can't block the ads on Android TV.

      Speaking of torture, it took years before Google finally rolled out their premium Youtube subscriptions in this country. And I noticed that they really stepped up the ads a couple of months before. They went from having a skippable ad at the beginning of a video every so often, to having more of these and some of them unskippable, to having more and more ads during videos. So I got the paid subscription... I don't mind paying for a service if it's ad-free. As long as they don't get greedy and start showing ads to paid subscribers, while slowly reducing the payout to streamers. I guess it's only a matter of time before we'll "cut the cord" on Youtube as well...

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    9. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by stooo · · Score: 1

      skip the ads ?
      You have to tap to do that !
      Use automation. Use an ad blocker.
      Get free from all the effort and slavery to skip to the next ad.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    10. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by houghi · · Score: 1

      I think that google is so smart that it shows ads that people are interested in. That is what they keep saying. They just know that I am not interested in them. That must be it.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It blocks ads hosted by the site itself.

    12. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      I don't know that they do.
      I run 2/3 of them (never heard of PB) and I get the usual shit ton of ads.
      I know someone who, running only ublock because I made him do it, NEVER gets ads on YouTube. Never. It's astonishing, but somehow I suspect he's fallen through some database crack in the system. Maybe he's not the only one?

      --
      -Styopa
    13. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      With the different ad blockers I've used over the years (currently using uBlock on Chrome), I've never had YouTube ads come through on the desktop. The YouTube plugin for Kodi (probably how I watch most YouTube videos nowadays) doesn't show any ads either, despite the lack of an ad blocker in Kodi. The only place where an ad might show up is in the YouTube Android app (despite having AdGuard running), but I rarely use that.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    14. Re: Does Youtube still have ads? by green1 · · Score: 1

      On Android I use vanced. No ads, otherwise it's the same as the official client. Find it on xda.

      Ublock stops all ads on my laptop too. The only time I see ads is if I use the TV set top box, so there's a reason I never do that.

    15. Re:Does Youtube still have ads? by green1 · · Score: 1

      Android use vanced. It's the official client, but with the ads stripped out and a few extra features. Find it on xda.

  3. A new idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Congratulations to Youtube for inventing the commercial break. This will surely be an idea loved by all!

    1. Re: A new idea! by stooo · · Score: 1

      Youtube has been broke from day one.
      The pretty much never made a profit, but that's irrelevant.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    2. Re: A new idea! by teg · · Score: 1

      Their alternative is you pay a monthly fee for their exciting new subscriber service, to go ad-free and also have access to all of their exciting channels. I mean really exciting. Channels. Of fun. Woohoo!

      The problem with that is that they only offer that as an add-on to their latest failing Spotify-competitor. You cannot subscribe to it stand-alone.

  4. Are they not the same fucking ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I remember trying to use the YouTube feature of a smart TV for some reason (so no ad blocking) and what I discovered was that YouTube would constantly show me the same fucking unskippable ad for every single video we watched. I think we watched like five different videos before deciding that watching videos via this "feature" was dumb (turns out the built-in smart TV apps tend to be terrible, I know, shocking news) but what I remember most was that every single video was preceded by the exact same ad for some game for a console I don't own.

    I'm not 100% anti-ad (I think it's probably possible to do it in such a way that it's not annoying) but god damn do the ad platforms go out of their way to be so annoying that eventually you throw up your hands and just block everything. Not to mention the added security you get by doing so.

    1. Re:Are they not the same fucking ad? by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is because the online ad system is a joke. Google shows the same ads over and over and are completely irrelevant. I don't know why companies still pour money into online advertising. It isn't targeted well at all.

    2. Re:Are they not the same fucking ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's especially hilarious if you sometimes watch videos on YouTube with small kids. The targeting system apparently doesn't consider the content of the videos you're watching. Or, well, no. I'd bet that it does, but it's only considered in aggregate, so it just determines the entire pool of ads you might get. So you go to watch some Sesame Street video with a three year old via something that doesn't allow ad blocking and get an ad for something completely inappropriate.

      I wish it were for things that were at least funny like for condoms or erectile dysfunction medicine, but instead it's ads for things like R rated movies in front of your video of Elmo. (OK, not really, since I'm fairly sure that the official Sesame Street account is allowed to police the ads placed on their videos. But it absolutely will do it for similar YouTube videos for children posted by people without the clout to limit what's allowed to advertise on their videos.)

      Which, of course, just leads to ad blockers being required for anyone who knows small children, in order to not have to explain why all those people were on fire before showing them that video of someone singing their ABCs.

    3. Re:Are they not the same fucking ad? by MrMr · · Score: 1

      Well, you should be happy. Irrelevant ads cost you less than those from companies you might actually buy stuff from.

    4. Re:Are they not the same fucking ad? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, occasionally, when I feel the need for a goof, I turn adblocking off when watching videos debunking some snakeoil, and usually it seems fairly reliable that I get ads for exactly the snakeoil the video debunks.

      The system works!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. Tech Bubble is over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The bloated, tumorous mass that is Alphabet is reaching the end of it natural lifecycle.
    Like the giant Dinosaurs of the Cretatious, tech companies have grown too massive, too specialized, and too homogeneous, needed ever more massive revenues simple to sustain the bloating overheads. Two ads. Three ads. Ten ads. When you're 3 stories tall and defecate piles larger than most other animals, you're always hungry for more.
    But they are more vulnerable than ever to any oncoming "extinction event". In our case, likely a fiscal contraction brought about by some fumbling central bank, or a geo-political disaster brought to us by our genius ruling class.
    Or hell, maybe people will just get tired of "high-tech" companies with a hundred thousand "smart guys" who can't seem to produce software or applications that even matches functionality commonplace 15 years ago, and who keep screwing up what we have left that's working, and who all seem to get paid 5 times more than anyone else actually producing something. The bigger Amazon gets, the less surprised I'll become of any sudden acceptance of nationalization among the growing American plebian class.

    But I digress. Because let's be honest people. How many of you ever considered Youtube to be something worth paying for?

    1. Re:Tech Bubble is over by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      My wife likes to watch a couple of Youtube streamers, and I sometimes watch instructional videos for work or hobbies (I prefer text but beggars can't always be choosers I suppose). We got so sick of the ads that we got a subscription. Worth it, in my opinion, even if it doesn't compare to Netflix in terms of € per hour of use.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re: Tech Bubble is over by houghi · · Score: 1

      I knew it was over when the first ads showed up. When Google raped Dejanews. Call it the King-Midas-Complex. Everybody tries to turn things into gold. Well, that brraks a lot. You see this in many other things, like books, movies, music, sports, ...
      It works, because people like shiney things.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Tech Bubble is over by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm so sick of the ads that I'm going to install a proxy to kill them. We still watch on the fire tv stick and having an ad play before almost every damned video we watch is already garbage.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Tech Bubble is over by RuiFRibeiro · · Score: 1

      Bloackada and Youtube Vanced for Android, Ublock origin on other platforms work pretty well keeping ads at bay, including in my Chromecast. No subscription. I also keep my country of origin as Canada for reducing the inane quantity of garbage that my country fellows post.

  6. Part of the roadmap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. Back to back ads with reduced frequency.
    2. Increased ad frequency.
    3. Back to back to back ads with reduced ad frequency.
    4. Increased frequency of ads.
    5. Ads consume at least 6 minutes per half hour and are arranged into added-value blocks called 'commercial breaks'.

    1. Re:Part of the roadmap by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've already stopped watching 99% of youtube on mobile because of the ads. Only when I'm really particularly interested in watching that video right now, I'll play the ad. Otherwise, I wait until I can get my laptop with adblock.

    2. Re:Part of the roadmap by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am a customer, trying to watch a youtube video. You, the fuck knuckle advertiser demand I watch the ad you want to scream at me first, will I buy your product, come on honestly will I buy your product, NO, I can not emphasise how much no. You are not selling me fucking anything except a hatred of your company, it is simply the way it is. I watch bugger all ads, I mean seriously bugger all, I pay for the bulk of my content, trying to force me to watch, what is now, an extremely annoying advertisement, does not make me want to do business with you, it makes me hate you, A WHOLE FUCKING LOT.

      Ads on youtube can only work after content, voluntarily. Sure more will watch the ad at the beginning but you stupid fucking advertisers will not be selling anything other than annoyance and they will remember the cause of the annoyance, you fucking POS ad.

      It's nothing like old idiot box ads, 15 minutes of every hour of viewing, people became accustomed, now, well, one or two ads a day and they really stand out in the worst way possible, pretty much a street side hawker running into your lounge room screaming at you that you buy the product and the only thing you remember fuck that company and fuck that product.

      OK people, honesty time, how many of you people have bought a product based upon a YouTube ad and how many of you have not bought a product because of a Youtube ad. The only Youtube ads, that seem to have positive effect are ones embedded in the content as a sponsor of that content, Google makes no money from these, well they need to smarten up. Buying Youtube and burying it under the billions in debt created by buying it, not that smart a move, fucked profitability right up. Youtube want to sell an ad, they have to be banner ads in prominent locations aligned with the content that invite greater interaction.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Part of the roadmap by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

      You know there are adblockers also for mobile browsers, right?

      --
      My first program:

      Hell Segmentation fault

    4. Re:Part of the roadmap by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Scream all you want, the sad truth about online advertising is that it is cheap. Even cheaper with targeted ads... no, that doesn't mean that they magically know you need new shoes so they show you ads for shoes, it means that they can target a certain demographic with a fair accuracy. And because it is so cheap, they can afford to show their ads to tens of thousands of people if only one of them decides to buy their product.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Part of the roadmap by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      No, actually I didn't know that. I spent a few minutes trying to find one, noticed it didn't work, and then gave up. If you can point me to a working ad block (for Android) I'll give it another shot.

    6. Re:Part of the roadmap by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      it means that they can target a certain demographic with a fair accuracy

      I can say that, without exception, I only get ads for things I have never,ever, shown the slightest interest in, or ads for things that I've already bought.

    7. Re: Part of the roadmap by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      Opera browser has built-in ad blocking.

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    8. Re:Part of the roadmap by RuiFRibeiro · · Score: 1

      The technology to block them is cheap too.

    9. Re:Part of the roadmap by skaralic · · Score: 1

      Wow, talk about first world problems. If it bothers you that much to see adds while consuming free content and sucking up their bandwidth, then pay for the no-ads version or go somewhere else (like, outside).

      Just decide whether you like free shit more than you hate ads.

    10. Re:Part of the roadmap by Eubeleus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and even though 99% of people will get annoyed and click the shit away from the ad, even a 1% response on direct marketing, depending on what it is, can be considered MASSIVE. So yes, they can afford the ill will. I've run ad campaigns that were deliberately designed to annoy, cajole, irritate - and when people started bitching about it on social media the response rate SOARED.

  7. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Youtube is testing the patience of their users, which is already near its limit.

  8. Because the phone is with you by tepples · · Score: 1

    When you're passing the time in a grocery store waiting for your carpooling roommate to finish her shopping, it's easier to carry a phone than a laptop.

  9. :rubs thumb against forefinger: by sheramil · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can only suppose that being forced to watch the first half of a second of an ad before skipping it counts as watching the ad in Youtube's opinion. Being forced to skip two of them doubles their ad-view count.

    "I know! We'll just compress the ads into the first half second! We could call them... blip-verts ."

    1. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by waynemcdougall · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. That's at least 20 minutes in the future.

      --
      Recycle PCs and build a wireless community network www.hillsborough.org.nz
    2. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      "I know! We'll just compress the ads into the first half second! We could call them... blip-verts ."

      And they will BLOW YOUR MIND!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I'd watch the BBC version twice, but the only good part of the American version was the ads. They should have just looped the intro music for 24 minutes.

    4. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by FalcDot · · Score: 1

      Well, forcing me to watch 5 seconds of an ad for something I'm not interested in, doesn't really help anyone.

      Use those 5 seconds to show me 10 ads that I can skip immediately and maybe one of those 10 will catch my eye, and maybe then someone might actually make some money off me.

    5. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      They've had that for ages, although it's about 3 seconds rather than 6. And some advertisers ( Apple comes to mind) apparently pay more to disable the skip altogether. As if there weren't enough reasons to hate Apple already.

    6. Re::rubs thumb against forefinger: by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "I know! We'll just compress the ads into the first half second! We could call them... blip-verts ."

      I nominate you for advertising industry messiah. Please convince them this is the greatest idea ever. Maybe some bullshit about subliminal messaging.

  10. That's awesome by Gabest · · Score: 1

    I no longer have to open my eyes and reach for the phone to press skip between videos before sleep. There will be no reason!

  11. Re: Youtube has ads??? by Shikaku · · Score: 1

    Youtube streams the ads on Android so you can't block them with a hosts file or any other blocking software even if you wanted to. Just don't use the official client or use the web version.

    Eh I'm just gonna quote myself because I looked and know the answer already.

  12. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's impossible to be a freeloader on the internet. The internet was created for the FREE exchange of information and data. If you and your polluting advertising cronies don't like it, then get the fuck off of my internet, you eternal September scum.

  13. Re: Youtube has ads??? by nnull · · Score: 1

    Yes, root your phone and it works. Oh wait, you can't root your phone anymore? Because why would you want to root your phone, right? There's no need to root your phone!

    Meanwhile, I enjoy ad free watching youtube on my phone. I can also play youtube in the background too without it having it pause.

  14. I mute ads by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    I really miss my DVR since cutting the cord. Muting ads is a poor second. I just tried watching the Saints game with my antenna, jeebus farukin christo what kind of idiot watches that many commercials? I didn't make it past the first quarter before finding something more productive to digest my food to.

    1. Re:I mute ads by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      I hear you... I haven't watched any cable in ages, though it's included in my Internet subscription and I still have the set top box. The other day I did some channel surfing. And holy crap aren't there a lot of ads? And isn't every single one a personal insult to our intelligence? I can't remember how we put up with that crap, but for the life of me I can't imagine why anyone would, these days.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:I mute ads by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      VPN to a country with fewer ads in its football streams. Germany works for me.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  15. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's a Canadian Youtuber who goes by the screen name AvE who does product tear downs and reviews. He has a Patreon to get funding and explicitly refuses to do manufacturer donated product reviews because of potential bias. He knows manufacturers sometimes pressure reviewers into going easy on their products. Due to that, he also has an aversion to ad based revenue. He wasn't affected by YouTube "adpocalypse" too much but it did make him even more averse to having ads on his channel.

    He had them disabled but YouTube forces them to play anyway. they are the same format as his videos and will play regardless of the player being used to view videos or the adblockers used as they come from the same content servers as the CDN serving the video. Adblockers have only served to make YouTube videos even more valuable to advertisers because of that.

    On the flip side of that you have Linus Tech Tips. He does do sponsored videos and he also puts his own ads in his videos for the products. So you will get YouTube forced ads at the beginning of his videos, then his sponsor product ad, then review and at the end another ad he made and inserted into the video (his ads are part of the actual video so they stay in the video and play every time it is viewed unlike YouTube ads which cycle through different ads).

    It is getting to the point where everything being viewed on YouTube feels like an infomercial and it is majorly offputting. I can usually tolerate up to three ads, after that there is nothing I want to see that is important enough for me to watch another ad. I just leave the site entirely.

  16. What ???? Youtube has ads ? Not so. by stooo · · Score: 3

    Youtube has ads ?
    Not on the videos I watch.
    Never saw those.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  17. oh well by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

    This of cause sucks for evryone not having youtube premiu, ( I watch a lot of content from a few creators and want to support them), personaly I nevre see ds on youtube, appart from the times scumbags include sponsor messages in the video it self. If you as me premium is wort it just for ad blocking )I watch a lot on IOS/TvOS so adblocking on youtube does not realy work

    1. Re:oh well by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      See, that's the reason right there. If you watched on a sensible OS/Browser combo, ad blocking would work.

      But I guess you're already used to paying for stuff others get for free, so that's fine.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  18. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If I wanted to watch ads longer than the clips between them, I could have kept my TV.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. Re:Cable TV Wins! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The main difference being that you don't have to record the movie so you can skip the ad breaks watching it but you can simply block the ads while watching.

    Other than that, yes, YouTube becomes more and more like cable TV.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  20. Instant solution by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1


    When using the youtube app for anything I noticed a gradual increase in the occasional ads that cannot be skipped. It's like we're all fucking hamsters and the wheel keeps shrinking ever so slightly to find the "optimum" levels of BS we'll put up with. This sort of forced crap only happens in the app.

    Almost any device that can run an "app" can run a browser. I never get this sort of shit with my uBlock Origin.

    We are being fed garbage all the time and it's escalating in complexity, timing and stealth. Look at practically any "app" compared to a browser experience from the perspective of being fed ads and I don't see a lot of reason to use dedicated apps.

    Youtube's app lacks "usability features" like playing while running a different app in full screen mode. I can put whatever on a browser and it will happily play along. In the app if I switch then it stops. This "feature" is designed to make sure there's a higher likelihood you'll be paying attention & watching ads.

    Some of it is a bit crazy if you look at more apps. For instance; youtube is free. The Financial Times is a paid-for service (not cheap). FT have an app that gathers data on you and gives you ads. Is this how you treat a paying customer? WTF? -uninstalled.

    Long story short as many of us know - If you can, avoid the app, use a browser and an ad-blocker.

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
  21. Re:Well... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You develop a better mouse trap, we develop a better mouse... it's not like this would be the first time.

    I'd really love me a new challenge, recently it seems they stopped trying. Splicing ads into the stream sure would be something new to tackle, looking forward to it!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. You don't get it, do you? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Try, just TRY please, to get into the mindset of your user. He browses your videos or, better, he looks at his front page and sees a new video from his favorite YouTuber. Hey, great, the day just got better, a new video from HIM/HER and I get to watch it.

    He clicks.

    And is greeted by an ad.

    Let's ponder for a moment what we have here now. We have someone whose mind is expecting and looking forward to seeing a video that he really, really wants to see. This ad could now be the most on-topic ad you could possibly imagine, it could be for the cure of his incurable brain tumor and he would cuss and curse for as long as he has to watch it before he can skip it. It could be the trailer for his favorite movie franchise that he has been watching religiously since birth. It does not matter.

    It is NOT what he wants NOW.

    And yes, that's worse than it was on cable. On cable, you knew that at 6:30pm your show starts. You knew that days in advance. Because that's how it always is. Watching an ad before does not change that. Your expectation is not disappointed because there was no immediate "want it now" motivation for you. Seeing a new video being offered IS such a moment. It's surprising (more or less), it's new and exciting and you want it NOW.

    Before anyone goes "waaah, entitled crybaby can't wait..." YES. That is how people are. People are looking forward to something and anything standing between them and that something will be pushed out of the way. Especially if it's nothing they give half a fuck about like an ad.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:You don't get it, do you? by rnturn · · Score: 1

      ``And yes, that's worse than it was on cable. On cable, you knew that at 6:30pm your show starts.''

      We haven't subscribed to cable since the early '90s. The model back then was: Cable->No Commercials. None. Nada. Oh HBO might have had the occasional promo for this month's ``Elton John -- In Concert'' (which was aired pretty much every month at the time) but there were no commercials at all back then.

      The closest thing we have to cable now is the free internet programming that we can receive on our semi-smart TV. Of course, Netflix is always available if we want to pay for that. (We don't.) Yeah, there are annoying commercials on the ``free'' content. Pretty sad that one needs to see commercials while watching Will Wheaton play role-playing games, other folks playing Minecraft, or videos of people falling down but `monetization' rules. (Just kidding. We skip past those channels as soon as we realize what's on. Some evening I'll sit down and delete those from the channel list.)

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    2. Re:You don't get it, do you? by skaralic · · Score: 1

      Try, just TRY please, to get into the mindset of your freeloading leech that is consuming your bandwidth and using your tech while expecting to pay absolutely nothing for it

      FTFY. I hate ads too but I don't want to pay for no ads so I'm stuck with them because free shit.

    3. Re:You don't get it, do you? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Once they stop selling my data, they can get back on that high horse again.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:You don't get it, do you? by skaralic · · Score: 1

      Once they stop selling my data, they can get back on that high horse again.

      It is perfectly clear that you are trading your data and time (watching ads) in exchange for free content and that you are doing this voluntarily.

      So, just stop. I would love to see some kind of alternate platform and model take off.

    5. Re:You don't get it, do you? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Why? I'm happy with this model.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  23. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by f3rret · · Score: 1

    It's my network, I'm in charge of which bits land on my network.

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  24. Re:Ads on youtube!? by fisted · · Score: 1

    With 50000 entries in your hosts file (why do people keep capitalizing it BTW?) your stub resolver must perform like shit. You're essentially slowing down everything that requires DNS, which these days is practically anything.

    You may want to consider dropping the fugly hack that is hosts file based "blocking" and go for a more sensible approach. Just food for thought.

  25. 40% by Luthair · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't there be half as many ad breaks? 40% sounds like they're going to run more ads in addition to doubling them up.

  26. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    It's impossible to be a freeloader on the internet. The internet was created for the FREE exchange of information and data. If you and your polluting advertising cronies don't like it, then get the fuck off of my internet, you eternal September scum.

    The internet was created so that the US government could survive a major exchange of nuclear weapons with the USSR.

    Everything else is just emergent phenomena.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  27. Re:What ???? Youtube has ads ? Not so. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

    It's funny, I never see ads on YouTube either, unless I'm using someone else's browser, and I'm not blocking them.

    Perhaps YouTube has figured out that it's just not worth showing ads to some people?

  28. Re:What ???? Youtube has ads ? Not so. by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Yeah, every time I browse the internet on someone else's computer I realize how much the internet would suck without uBlock origin. Then again, I'd probably spend almost no time on the computer outside work if I weren't using an ad blocker, so I suppose that sword cuts both ways.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  29. Re: Youtube has ads??? by green1 · · Score: 1

    My phone isn't rooted, but I still block ads. Sideload vanced from xda to get ad free YouTube, and background play. For the browser you can get ad blocking browsers, or add blockers that use a VPN. Personally I'm using my own VPN which blocks ads with DNS.

    I used to root every time, but I got tired of the constant battle, and the big features I needed can now be done without it (ad blocking, and setting the phone to a reasonable resolution)

  30. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by rikkards · · Score: 1

    If he really wants to get Youtube ads to stop showing he needs to spread out to doing gun videos. InRange has never setup for ad revenue sharing (like AvE they wanted to stay impartial) and even went to the point of disabling ads completely when they started removing ad sharing for gun videos.

    I used to block ads on my android tablet using x-framework and their youtube adblocker but it seems like about 6 months ago the cat and mouse game finally came to an end. They haven't updated the version for Nougat and I now have to sit through them.

  31. Re: Obligatory "YouTube has ads?" by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

    If you want less ads, I recommend uMatrix (successor to http switchboard). Skookum as frig.

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
  32. Early bird special by Waccoon · · Score: 1

    So they just want to show more ads up-front before we get any content. That sounds like it will end well.

    I've already unsubbed from several channels that got into the "two minutes of endorsements, begging for likes and subs, and Patreon, but hey, you can just skip it if you don't like it, so it's okay".

  33. There is such an obvious solution. by Static · · Score: 1

    And a few have mentioned it. Yes, it is paying for Youtube Premium.

    Originally, I signed up to explicitly get rid of the ads. But almost immediately I got offered the Youtube Music app and I love it. And I didn't have to teach it what music I liked because it already knew as I'd been Liking the music videos I love for years. Subtle advantage over other music services: Youtube usually has the music video, too. :)

  34. TV vs YT ads by jelabarre · · Score: 1

    One thing people are missing regarding YouTube inserting ads in the middle of videos, when they try to compare it to broadcast TV.

    When you watched a show on TV, and they were inserting ads in the middle, those shows would be edited with the expectation that there would be commercial breaks, and the layout of the show would account for them. On YouTube, they'll break in with a commercial whenever they feel like it. Doesn't matter if you're watching a musical performance, technical presentation, whatever. The person in the video could be in mid-sentence, mid-phrase, and YT/Google will jump in and say "fuck what you were watching, here's an ad".

    You know, for the most part I was willing to tolerate reasonable advertising on YT, because I realize someone has to pay for keeping the servers running. I have some clue of the economics of it. But when they start breaking into the MIDDLE of videos, at illogical and inappropriate places, then it prompts me to find a way to block ALL advertising on YT, even the ones I was willing to tolerate. Fuck 'em.

    Not to mention that now they *INSIST* upon placing thumbnails of other videos on TOP of the video even before it's done playing. Seriously? Perhaps there was something at the end of that video we wanted to see. And their jackass thumbnails ruin the viewing experience. When I complained on their so-called "support" forums, some mealy-mouthed GoogleTwit(TM) said "oh, people are supposed to add extra space at the end of the video..." Really? I don't think so. Google would like to pass off the blame to OTHERS for their own bullshit mistakes. No concept of usage cases, no thought that when they *change* their shit code, it breaks things that worked before. They expect people to have to constantly revisit everything just in case Google fucked up yet something ELSE in the interim. Can't even own up to their own fuckups (then again, there are SO many of them, it must be impossible to keep track).

    Sad state that the ONLY thing Google seem capable of developing without royally fucking it up is advertising. Everything else they make may turn to shit (or just outright start out as shit from the get-go), but boy can they serve ads.