Slashdot Mirror


Beijing To Judge Every Resident Based on Behavior by End of 2020 (bloomberg.com)

China's plan to judge each of its 1.3 billion people based on their social behavior is moving a step closer to reality, with Beijing set to adopt a lifelong points program by 2021 that assigns personalized ratings for each resident. From a report: The capital city will pool data from several departments to reward and punish some 22 million citizens based on their actions and reputations by the end of 2020, according to a plan posted on the Beijing municipal government's website this week. Those with better so-called social credit will get "green channel" benefits while those who violate laws will find life more difficult. The Beijing project will improve blacklist systems so that those deemed untrustworthy will be "unable to move even a single step," according to the government's plan. Xinhua reported on the proposal Tuesday, while the report posted on the municipal government's website is dated July 18.

56 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. Black Mirror - Nosedive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BM did an episode on this.

    Sounds like a great fucking system.

    Remind me why we're doing business with these people again?

    1. Re:Black Mirror - Nosedive by Kaenneth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only difference is in the US private companies keep scores on you instead of the government.

    2. Re:Black Mirror - Nosedive by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Remind me why we're doing business with these people again?

      Are you joking? We do business in places where they abduct American residents, torture them, chop them up into pieces and dissolve them in acid.

      Because there's money to be made.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Black Mirror - Nosedive by swillden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Only difference is in the US private companies keep scores on you instead of the government.

      Well, the other difference is that the only credit score they track is about, well, credit -- your ability to borrow money and otherwise incur future debts. And it's not some judgment on your overall fitness for society, it's just a judgment on how likely you are to pay what you owe.

      This "other difference" is enormous. So big that they aren't remotely the same things at all.

      The closest thing the US has to this social credit score is a criminal record. If you are convicted of a crime, especially a felony, then the government keeps track of that, and it will affect your ability to get a job, own a job, vote (in most states), etc. And if your crime was sexual in nature, it will affect where you're allowed to live and work as well. What makes this particularly nasty is that prosecutors are really good at extracting confessions and pleas of guilt even from innocent people.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:Black Mirror - Nosedive by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Yeah well, it's not like the voters are objecting much

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:Black Mirror - Nosedive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't worry, you will soon have this system too. Cars have mandatory GPS, so they will first start at car insurance based on your GPS recorded driving habits. Then they will combine it with traffic control to see if you are speeding/driving on red. Then it will naturally evolve to everyone having the chip (which has been discussed lately a lot) and that will evolve into everyone being tracked throughout the city instead of just your work or your home. And so on and so on.

      And you will be rated based on all of those things and your social media use etc.

      I wish i was kidding, but i'm not.

    6. Re: Black Mirror - Nosedive by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      No, he was residing in the US and planning to move to Turkey because his fiance liked it there. That's why the crown prince arranged his murder through their US Consulate; that's who he was making the arrangements through.

    7. Re:Black Mirror - Nosedive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's not really true unfortunately.

      Cambridge Analytica was a relatively small databroker which focussed on deriving psychological profiles from your data through 'inference'. Larger databrokers have 8000 scores for sale. All of them feed your mundane data (social media scraped, smart home data, etc) to algorithms that then compare your data to that of other people they know more about, and if your data exhibits similar traits they will infer that you also fit in certain categories.

      This talk explains things:

      Social Cooling - big data's unintended side effect

      But I also recommend checking out the work of:

      - "Weapons of Math Destruction" by Cathy o Neill (book)

      - "Black Box Society" by Frank Pasquale (book)

      For me it's the Social Cooling I worry about. When people feel watched and judged "at scale", then large scale chilling effects might occur. This is China's goal. But in the west we should want to avoid these effects, as they hinder our ability to sustain a vibrant democracy. See:
      Social Cooling website

    8. Re:Black Mirror - Nosedive by Kiuas · · Score: 2

      Don't worry, you will soon have this system too.

      I mean, thing with all large western states is, we don't really now if these kind of systems exist or not. Social media and credit information and so on is all out there, and there be large agencies with significant technical capabilities that we know are capable of tracking mobile phones' location and bank transfers etc. They operate gigantic data centers and apparently (if the Snowden leaks are to be believed) intercept data from ISPs and so on. Hell, Google and other companies already track device locations pretty much all the time for commercial purposes, so copying that data to some server somewhere in case of 'terrorists' is not that far out of the question.

      I'm not saying it's happening 'cause again, there's no way to prove this. I'm just saying if some letter combination agency would be doing this, is there any way we'd really be able to know? The official line is that they're only collecting 'metadata' in bulk, but whatever 'metadata' in fact consists of is another matter entirely.

      This is not to say that such tracking is identical to the system in China, because it's not used for loan applications and flight ticket purchases and so on like in China. Just pointing out that the collaboration between tech giants and governmental agencies in the West as well is likely more tight than most people assume.

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    9. Re:Black Mirror - Nosedive by jbmartin6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are right that it is no where near the scale of what China is implementing, but credit scores get used for a good number of non-credit decisions such as getting a job.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    10. Re:Black Mirror - Nosedive by sremick · · Score: 2

      Well, the other difference is that the only credit score they track is about, well, credit -- your ability to borrow money and otherwise incur future debts. And it's not some judgment on your overall fitness for society, it's just a judgment on how likely you are to pay what you owe.

      Except that that's increasingly not true. We're now seeing one's credit score being used as criteria for determining what auto insurance rate you get, your ability to get housing, and (ironically) as part of the application review process when you try to get a job.

      The negative feedback loop that that last one causes is particularly bad.

    11. Re: Black Mirror - Nosedive by Anubis350 · · Score: 2

      Clearly you know wrong. He was a legal permanent resident, and in the middle of the citizenship process, his kids *are* US citizens, and he worked for a US newspaper.

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  2. The Book of Lord Shang by astrofurter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "A state where uniformity of purpose has been established for one year, will be strong for ten years; where uniformity of purpose has been established for ten years, it will be strong for a hundred years, where uniformity of purpose has been established for a hundred years, it will be strong for a thousand years; and a state which has been strong for a thousand years will attain supremacy."

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

    1. Re:The Book of Lord Shang by Shazatoga · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Great and all until a black swan arrives and invalidates the current structure. Democracies (inc. Republics), for all their flaws, can face a black swan or two as they are designed to handle change. They aren't perfect (Rome's refusal to embrace change and to enfranchise the Italians led to the populist dictatorship of the Caesars), but tend to be more anti-fragile than the alternatives.

    2. Re:The Book of Lord Shang by LaughingRadish · · Score: 5, Informative

      A Roman poet wrote "a rare bird in the lands and very much like a black swan". At the time, black swans were thought to not exist. In the 1500s, the phrase "black swan" was a common expression that something was impossible. Then in 1697, Dutch explorers saw black swans in Western Australia. The phrase then morphed into an expression that a perceived impossibility might later be disproven.

      See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    3. Re:The Book of Lord Shang by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      Democracies (inc. Republics)

      Pet peeve: Can we stop using Sid Meier's Civilization as a bible on types opf government?

      Examples of Democracies: Britain, USA
      Examples of countries that are not Democracies: China, Saudi Arabia
      Examples of Republics: China, USA
      Examples of Monarchies: Britain, Saudi Arabia

      A Republic is merely a country with a non-hereditary head of state. Democracy, using the most widely accepted definition (yes, I know some dickhead is going to respond here with an "AcKsHuReLy DeMoCrAcY iS wHuR eVaRyWoN vOtEs oN eVaRyFiNg" comment) is a measure of how answerable a government is to the governed, usually implemented using an elected legislature and a - written or otherwise - constitutional requirement the government obey the same laws everyone else does (though the dickhead is kinda right that cities have in the past (when cities had a significant amount of autonomy) gone for the everyone-votes-on-everything thing, which is impractical the more people are involved so we don't do it.)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:The Book of Lord Shang by Shazatoga · · Score: 2

      A Republic is a government based on the model of the post-Monarchy pre-Imperial Roman government. The Romans called this government res publica (thing of the public). Nations like the US and France that call themselves Republics are based off the Roman system. The US system is almost a 1:1 copy, proconsul = president (but only one), senate = senate, house = plebeian council, augers = Supreme Court, field of Mars = electoral college, etc (the written Constitution and balancing of powers are the significant changes). There are dictatorships that call themselves Republics because it sounds good (PRC, DPR North Korea, former USSR), but they don't at all follow the basic Roman system and are not Republics.

  3. Re:just add Transgender bathrooms and free abortio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dude, why go there? I happen to be trans and liberal and I'm horrified by this. This something right out of 1984 and it has nothing to do with "liberals". I'm quite sure I enjoy my freedoms and privacy as much as you do. I have no idea what you have against trans people but that doesn't mean we don't want the same things in life. The last place I would ever want to live is in a totalitarian state.

  4. Should work flawlessly by Shazatoga · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Good thing bureaucrats are incorruptible and would never abuse the system for a bribe or petty revenge. /s This will be one of the greatest hacking targets in the world. Not to mention that putting the wellbeing of 1.4 billion people into a database means that even a small error in an edge case in the code can screw millions of people.

    1. Re:Should work flawlessly by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      In this time and age? All that's required is that someone feels you're a $conspiracy_theory_bad_group_member for him to make it his mission to fuck up your life.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. Beijing is creating its own biggest headache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Creating an entire subset of your society that is so locked out of daily life that they can't even function is a very, very quick way to incite organized resistance - not just out of ideological opposition, but from pure survival necessity. Blacklisted people will band together with blacklisted people to set up a parallel society so they can simply function day to day. Food? Housing? Transportation? You can't freeze out even 5% of the population from that and keep it contained.

    If they were just making life difficult, that would be one thing, but it sounds like the Chicoms have gone so overboard that they won't be able to even eat or sleep under a roof. Watch it blow up.

    1. Re:Beijing is creating its own biggest headache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      America does that with felony convictions in the United States, and no one cares because convicted felons "did something bad"...well, people who get blacklisted in China will be considered to have done something bad by Chinese standards. Nothing will happen except create a nice pool of easily exploitable people.

    2. Re:Beijing is creating its own biggest headache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, illegal immigrants could always just, you know, not come here...The Chinese in China don't have a choice.

    3. Re:Beijing is creating its own biggest headache by ArylAkamov · · Score: 2

      Or they could just leave, since they're here illegally and are not wanted (by people on the right, anyway).

    4. Re:Beijing is creating its own biggest headache by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And see what it has done for the US. In some towns there are areas where even the police doesn't dare to go anymore, this is the very definition of a parallel society with its own rules, its own policies and its own social system.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Beijing is creating its own biggest headache by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      No, we don't have towns where the police don't dare to go. We have towns where the police don't care to go.

    6. Re:Beijing is creating its own biggest headache by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Which prompts the next question: if you have a bad social credit score how easy is it to repair it?

      Is it like social media where you can buy likes to boost your score?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Beijing is creating its own biggest headache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're kidding, right? Right-leaning farmers, restaurateurs, constructionn/real estate developers LOVE having illegal immigrants here, since they provide the cheap labor those industries need. They just want to make sure those immigrants STAY illegal, since with a path to citizenship, their easily exploitable labor pool collapses.
      Using them as a convenient scapegoat to drum up votes from the politically illiterate and bigoted working class is just a fortuitous side effect.
      The Republican leadership has never had ANY intention of building a wall or engaging in mass deportation. The shows made of child separation, etc. are merely intended to on the one hand fool bigoted proles into thinking something to be done and on the other to terrify undocumented migrants out of using social services while here and speaking up for better treatment.

  6. A nightmare for freedom, but no benefits? by piojo · · Score: 2

    Obviously this is like a dystopian dream and will stifle the feeling of freedom. But we should keep in mind Beijing (and China in general) has some a lot of the sort of petty problems which more rarely happen in the west: Rampant littering. People encourage their children to urinate in the street. Scammers take advantage of tourists, brazenly acting in public places in broad daylight. Taxi drivers lie about the fare, or refuse to use the meter so they can set whatever rate they choose, depending on the passenger's skin color and accent. People get to the front of a queue not by waiting, but by walking to the front of the queue.

    The questions that come to mind are whether it will work, whether this is temporary (until the above cultural problems are solved), and whether it's worth the loss in feeling of freedom.

    --
    A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    1. Re:A nightmare for freedom, but no benefits? by currently_awake · · Score: 3, Informative

      No government in history has willingly given up power.

    2. Re: A nightmare for freedom, but no benefits? by ljw1004 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Counterexample: every country that joined the EU gave up the supremacy of its own high court, have up the ability to determine numerous regulations, indeed have up the final say on its national budget as we see with Italy today.

  7. The nightmare may also happen in the West by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What happens in China is definitely a nightmare, but before we laugh at those stupid Chinese we ought to take stock of what is happening right here in the West.

    We are being monitored too. 24/7.

    What we do online.

    Who our friends are/were.

    Where we go shopping.

    What kinds of item we usually buy.

    The types of association / club we have membership in.

    Whom we met last Wednesday.

    Which TV / online streaming programs we consume.

    And so on. And so forth.

    Who is to say what's happening in China won't happen here?

  8. We had all that in the west by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Know how we solved it? Mostly cops giving out tickets. The scammers got arrested. Same results, maybe better, and no massive and terrifying misuse of government power.

    China's problem is they treat their working class like crap. This is the kind of crap you have to resort to when you need to keep people from Unionizing.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  9. We're revoking their most favorite nation status by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    any day now. Yep. Any day now. Right after we stop selling bombs to the Saudis...

    In other news, I can buy a 50" TV for $200 bucks this Black Friday. And the new iPhone is _sweet_.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  10. Re:Totalitarianism In a Nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Same shit happened under McCarthy, which is ironic given your words. Could happen again in the US in a few years, only it would be an App that measured your Patriotism. It's not a left/right thing, it's a totalitarian thing.

  11. already happens by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    The Chinese government already has this information. The difference now is the information is more open, more publicly available, it's actually a good thing.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  12. Give me your tired by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 2

    Give me your tired
    Your poor
    Your huddled masses
    With a good social credit score

    --
    Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  13. Why do you think that is a problem - for China? by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Blacklisted people will band together with blacklisted people to set up a parallel society

    Yep! And then they will either be sent to re-education camps, or "disappeared".

    China in fact would find it very HANDY for such people to band together, it would save them a lot of time.

    If you want a 100% effective Panopticon, I can think of no better state on Earth that can make that happen by sweeping the undesirables under the rug.

    So what everyone has to decide in the end is, do they want a model like that or a model like America? I'm not really sure there are any other workable models left.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why do you think that is a problem - for China? by dryeo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      America, with its no-fly list, its sex offender list where taking a pee or a selfie can fuck your life, your criminal thing where being arrested and released is enough to fuck you, your employment laws that allow you to be fired for posting the wrong thing somewhere? The right to own a gun with how many exceptions?
      Not to mention the political system that gives a choice of Coke or Pepsi and everyone is judged by their political affiliation.
      As someone posted up the page, great rights written into your Constitution, shitty in practice.
      For someone like you, with a good social credit standing, your country seems great, wait till you get wrongly arrested, especially if you can't afford a lawyer.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  14. idiotic assessment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People invest in protecting what's important to them; that's why banks invest in vaults and rich people have guards for their families and properties.

    The USA has a huge military budget because:
    [1] it values its freedom and independence
    [2] it values its allies and trade routes
    [3] it costs the USA a lot more to get any measure of military might since it does not have a conscripted military and its materiel is not made by government suppliers.

    The USA has not, historically, HAD a "health service" because we traditionally left health to the people themselves, the private sectore, and communities and states (The US Constitution says nothing about healthcare, and it explicitly says that anything it does not assign to the federal government belongs to the people and to the states).

    A little knowledge is dangerous --- and by your posting I judge you "mostly harmless"

    1. Re:idiotic assessment by guruevi · · Score: 2

      Medical treatment was important 230 years ago too, they had doctors and hospitals and knew the benefits of them. They also had machine guns and chemical weapons. They also had police brutality, illegal immigration, racial issues, illegal drugs, independent militia, mass media, fake news...

      Yet none of it was important enough for them to grant control for any of it over to the federal government.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:idiotic assessment by iwbcman · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Man oh man, The BS is strong with this one:

      The USA has a huge military budget because:
      [1] it values its freedom and independence
      [2] it values its allies and trade routes
      [3] it costs the USA a lot more to get any measure of military might since it does not have a conscripted military and its materiel is not made by government suppliers.

      The USA has a huge military budget because:

      [1] it has whipped it's population, and that of a significant portion of the worlds population, into a frenzy of fear and paranoia, by maintaining a permanent war status since the end of WWII. Whether hot or cold, the USA has waged war against non-enemies, aggressively supporting brutal dictatorships around, killing millions in defence of "freedom and democracy" around the world. The USA as "protector" of the "free world" has been holding the human species hostage to the possibility of imminent extinction via nuclear weapons for nearly 70 years now. This in the name of valuing its freedom and independence.

      [2]it has decided that the best social control mechanism for social pacification is to provide the lowest possible cost for goods and promoted consumerism as ersatz status symbols for a largely disenfranchised permanent underclass. In order to secure such cheap access to goods, the USA must dominate all world trade and be able to dictate prices for resources, resource extraction, production and distribution. This in the name of valuing its allies and trade routes.

      [3] it spends a lot less money for the size of our military than any other country would for a similarly sized and scaled military because 18 year-old's with no prospects always form a cheap labor pool( "sold" as in soldier, comes from Roman Latin, daily wage-worker), particularly if one can convince them that they are serving their country men in the name of noble goals and values like "freedom and democracy". And because military production in the USA has always been "dual-purpose", a civilian feel-good, while producing weapons of mass destruction.

      The USA has co-opted a tremendously large section of it's so-called private market for dual-purpose: production of disposable goods, while supplying the worlds largest military with an endless production line of "goods", of which no good can ever come. Most major manufacturing firms in the USA would not be economically viable if it were not for this arrangement. Boeing could never make it solely producing commercial air-liners, the market for such is not large enough, but if the Pentagon needs x number of fighter jets, missiles and rockets every year, which must be constantly restocked, due to usage in wars or due to degradation from not ever being used, they can show a profit for their civilian production lines. The same is, and has always been, true for GM, Ford, GE, etc.

      The USA has not, historically, HAD a "health service" because we traditionally left health to the people themselves, the private sectore, and communities and states (The US Constitution says nothing about healthcare, and it explicitly says that anything it does not assign to the federal government belongs to the people and to the states).

      The USA has not, historically, HAD a health service, because immiseration is a constitutive part of maintaining an exploitable permanent underclass. During the first 250 years of American history, surplus value, ie. profit, was made primarily by either a) stealing the indigenous peoples lands or b) exploiting "free labor", ie. slavery. Following the civil war profit has largely been made by exploiting those born into inter-generational poverty, both here and around the world. The majority of Europeans who immigrated to the USA during the first 150 years of colonization were debt-prisoners, ie. the then european permanent underclass. The USA has proudly cultivated cultural identities for the permanent underclass, going back almost 350 years, nowadays we call them "redne

  15. Google works for Chinese government by drnb · · Score: 2

    Only difference is in the US private companies keep scores on you instead of the government.

    Well in China it is US companies, ex Google, helping to keep track of people on behalf of the Chinese government. Its only the US government that Google/Amazon/etc employees refuse to work for.

    1. Re:Google works for Chinese government by MrKaos · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Same as in pre WWII Germany, where Ford sold trucks and IBM Holerite machines.

      (IIRC) U.S companies sued the US government for bombing German factories they invested in.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  16. Scary as f*ck, is it not? by Qbertino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We all know that Orwell would say "OK, I give up. I was totally wrong, this is way more sophisticated a totalitarian system than I could dream up." We all happly carry our dobbleplusgood portable televisor around with us. Add a super-controlling engieered gouvernment to that, and you're way past 1984. Big time.

    Maybe next time around I'll really ditch my regular smartphone for something else. I've allready considered stocking up on older Blackberrys. They're pretty cheap now.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  17. No fly lists by aberglas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Has similarity. A serious penalty, ex judicial, no right of appeal.

    Only in the USA. No other democracy. It is very strange that the USA has the best constitution concerning rights and the worst record of actually providing them.

    That said, it is still nothing like what China is proposing. And has already imposed on the Uyghurs. China is becoming very grim. Nobody there will dare to criticize the government on anything.

    If Emperor Xi goes bad, he cannot be stopped domestically. And he can drag the whole world down with him.

  18. Mandatory GPS by aberglas · · Score: 4, Informative

    They do not need mandatory GPS in cars. They already have number plate readers everywhere. Plus they can track your phone.

  19. Re:What a bunch of motherfucking assholes! by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which—even if true—has nothing to do with the topic at hand, since China isn't really a Communist country in any way other than in the name of the ruling party.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  20. They are doing it wrong by Gabest · · Score: 2

    You just have to report on your neighbors, and they report about you. Crowd-sourcing worked very well under the soviet communism.

  21. A plan for mental illness by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This system will be heaven for people with Narcissistic Personality Disorder because they will be able to extend their abuse onto anybody they meet in a meaningful way. They will be able to charm and connive all of the social goodwill they need while causing serious damage to the people they abuse.

    Social media is the vehicle for personality disorders to spread.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  22. Re:just add Transgender bathrooms and free abortio by Kiuas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's the big deal? Just think of it like China is adopting a big Code Of Conduct, and people who don't behave accordingly will be blacklisted, but instead of just from open source software development, from life!. Isn't that your tranny SJW end game?

    Dude literally stated that he's opposed to all of this as a liberal and you went and argued the exact opposite point because apparently either you cannot read or just enjoy building massive strawmen. How 'fun'. I can do this too, watch me:

    "What's the big deal, China's just making sure no-one can openly criticize the Dear Leader or his party, and those who dissent too hard or belong to the wrong religion/ethnicity/political movement will be taken to 're-education camps' where if need be they can be killed and their organs harvested if some Good Loyal Citizens(tm) are in need of them, isn't that your ultra-conservative Trumpian end-game; to have the government be able to operate with impunity, above the rule of law and get rid of the pesky media that Trump calls 'the enemy'?"

    See how easy this is? Now Is this productive for the discussion at large in any way? Nope. It's just 'ooh I'm so right they're so wrong aah' -partisan ego jerk off for cunts like you. Grow the fuck up man.

    --
    "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
  23. How to destabilize China... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hack the thing. The hack could come from a government, or a private organization like WikiLeaks with an interest in causing chaos. Don't destroy it, just start slightly altering people's credit.

    Just start lowering the credit of people with military training and access to guns a fractional amount. Veterans, police, military, etc. Make them slightly more angry and frustrated. Then start fractionally increasing the credit of people with borderline anti-government views. Create an angry underclass with military training and access to weapons while helping some of the people who will radicalize them do their thing.

  24. What could possibly go wrong? by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Beijing project will improve blacklist systems so that those deemed untrustworthy will be "unable to move even a single step,"

    So basically they will create a group of people who have nothing left to lose. Well done. That's going to work out great.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  25. Actually they're solving the problem by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    of how to create an underclass in a country that is increasingly homogeneous.

    See, in order for a ruling class to keep a working class in line they need to divide the working class. In America we do this along racial lines (Black/White/Latino). India uses a caste system. Japan got creative and declared some professions "unclean" and forced families into them, then kept lists of those families.

    The goal here is to get you "kicking down". e.g. to direct your rage at the poor lot in life you got at a group below you, until you get to a small enough and low group that they're easily controlled. Like I said above, the pattern repeats again and again.

    There's two problems with this in 2018.

    1. Education. Well educated people don't see the point of hating on someone without reason; and China's been doing a massive education push.

    2. Interbreeding. Folks don't enforce apartheid like they used to. So there's a gradual intermixing until the groups aren't distinct enough anymore. Japan made this work with their caste system, but that needed Buddhism to work, and even then education eventually broke it down. China's facing the same problem.

    Giving everyone a "score" is a prefect way to create a new caste system and once again get everyone "kicking down".

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  26. Re:/. should judge behavior to stop BULLYING... ap by Humbubba · · Score: 2
    If you have to shitpost, please be more amusing. For example:

    For a while there, I thought China had figured out how to apply the Nash Equilibrium to society via big data and the cognitive neuroscience of behavior.

    Then I thought, it's China, dude. What's really going on is probably more of a game of "Fuck You, Buddy", where somebody's got to win, and if it isn't you, it might be me.

    Oh, wait... that's us.

    Never mind.

  27. Re:Totalitarianism In a Nutshell by ArylAkamov · · Score: 2

    Everyone is quick to talk shit about McCarthy, but nobody seems to remember that he ended up being right about communist infiltration in our government, particularly in the state department.