Slashdot Mirror


The People of Ohio Can Now Pay Their Taxes in Bitcoin (qz.com)

Starting this week, businesses in Ohio will be able to pay taxes in bitcoin through a new platform, OhioCrypto.com, a first in the US. From a report: For many enthusiasts, part of the appeal of crypto has been the very fact that these currencies are not backed by governments. That makes it harder for politicians to manipulate currencies to their own ends, they say. But for the same reason, states have sought to sideline cryptocurrencies, comfortable to dismiss bitcoin as a passing fad. So Ohio, and its treasurer Josh Mandel, see embracing them as a way to signal that the state is tech-savvy and forward-thinking. "I do see [bitcoin] as a legitimate form of currency," Mandel told (paywall) the Wall Street Journal.

149 comments

  1. BREAKING: OHIO BANKRUPT, Treasurer fleeing on foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They better be cashing out the picosecond those BT transactions go through...

  2. Jumped the gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of places that embraced bitcoin quickly are already discontinuing it or not supporting it anymore.

    1. Re:Jumped the gun by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      A lot of places that embraced bitcoin quickly are already discontinuing it or not supporting it anymore.

      It's never really been stable enough to be used properly as a currency. A currency that hops around in value up and down every few days isn't a very useful currency- it's an investment vehicle not a currency.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  3. Re:You people need to STOP BULLYING ME... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Are you the guy that spams every thread trying to market some product? If so, you deserve to be censored.

  4. Found the bitcoin investor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... treasurer Josh Mandel

    Man was that easy.

    1. Re:Found the bitcoin investor! by desdinova+216 · · Score: 2

      he's only treasurer until the first of the year because he didn't run for re-election

  5. Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by djbckr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I seriously cannot comprehend how mind-bogglingly stupid [some/most] politicians can be. How do these people even function in society?

    1. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really just a sign that nobody sane or intelligent wants the job.

    2. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      I assume this is to associate wallets with real identities and then nail them with taxes.

      Oh, you day traded crypto and made $10k in 2017, well, we'd like our cut of the shorterm capital gains.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Politicians at the state and local level are just utter trash. The federal government isn't so great either, but at least at that level there are tons of deep state flunkies aka "aids" and "staffers" that help the politicians not fuck everything up too horribly.

    4. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, you day traded crypto and made $10k in 2017, well, we'd like our cut of the shorterm capital gains.

      Oh no, people have to pay the taxes they owe. I'm so sorry for you.

      Fuck assholes who think "it happened on a computer, so it's totally different". Fuck the people who think that means they can patent 100 year old things done on a computer. Fuck the companies that think they can ignore safety regulations because they're booking hotel rooms on a computer. Fuck assholes who say "I'd don't owe taxes because I made my money on a computer"

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      They can't. That's why they ran for office. Their screwups cost everyone else a lot of money and destroy lives, but they usually get off with little more than a slap on the wrist most of the time.

    6. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the ones running a spy operation on a campaign using anti-terrorism laws, while lying to the judges to get FISA warrants signed off?

      Yea, we need more of that.

    7. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like it or not, people have stored wealth in various cryptos. So it is logical to make it easier for them to spend it, even by paying their taxes with it. Do they allow PayPal? If yes, then this is something equivalent. If not, then I guess there is something else at play here (or politicians just trying to play it cool).

    8. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

      cannot comprehend how mind-bogglingly stupid [some/most] politicians can be

      Can you spell out what you mean? I'm assuming you mean your comment to somehow apply in the context of crypto currency, but past that I'm not clear what point you're making.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    9. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fuck assholes who say "I'd don't owe taxes because I made my money on a computer"

      I prefer this version:

      Fuck assholes who say "Everybody else can pay my share of the taxes because I made my money on a computer."

    10. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree with you.

      My point is that everyone is ragging on the treasurer for allowing this, when to me it seems like an intelligent way to capture revenue that is due.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    11. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only if you also think using any public infrastructure is trespassing, sending your kids to a public school is fraud, and are ok with us checking your tax return before sending police or firefighters to help you if you need it. Don't want to pay taxes, move to Somalia. Those of us who understand that a society is stronger if we pay for certain things jointly can stay here without you.

    12. Re: Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      What's stupid about equipping your e-commerce system to accept crypto? There is no downside.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    13. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then stop using the publicly funded internet, thief.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    14. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      It's worse than you thought.

      The voters:

      1.) Voted for those asshats or
      2.) Voted against and lost or
      3.) Didn't vote. [this is the majority vote]

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    15. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Man.

      Bitcoin caused all that shit?

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    16. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      It doesn't natter why someone runs for office.

      What matters is that people elected them.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    17. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      We have a winner!

      Sure, that transaction is anonymous - until it's associated with a real-life ID. And then EVERY transaction you've ever made is now 100% traceable. Oh, we see you sent a few thousand dollars to some account in Kazakhstan in 2014, what was that for? Oh, and you cashed out a few coins in December 2017, but no mention of income was made. And why were you sending Satoshis at a regular clip in 2015 until now, to a recently-convicted oxy dealer?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    18. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But those believers of Bitcoin need their own representatives on state level, just as rednecks, flat earthers and creationists do. This is democracy at its finest.

    19. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are you talking to? I mean honestly, what is going on? This rant, apparently directed at no one in this thread, came from nowhere. This is an outlandish strawman.

    20. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by youngone · · Score: 2

      Josh Mandel is a Republican, and has no qualifications to be treasurer so the chances he understands the implications of this are roughly zero.

    21. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      It's a response to someone saying that the purpose is to link people to bitcoin wallets to enforce tax laws. These are usually put forth by someone who thinks that is a bad thing. That's where it came from. According to the poster I was responding to, he thought it was just the government being clever. So, it may have come from "tone over text" issues.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    22. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume this is to associate wallets with real identities and then nail them with taxes.

      Oh, you day traded BTC and made $10k in 2017, well, we'd like our cut of the short term capital gains.

      FTFY

      You were imagining that BTC are somehow different than GBP or AAPL? Or that because you bought BTC somewhere back in Feb 2011 when they were trading at parity with USD that selling them a month ago at the peak was magic?

    23. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 0

      why do you think a single transaction tells you much about past ones?

      If you dont know how bitcoin works; why post nonsense?

      Hint: it doesnt work that way

    24. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      BTC is somehow different, you can get and spend it in fairly anonymous ways and you can pay your OH state tax with it.

      I'm not sure what you mean by the rest of your post though.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    25. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot if you cannot comprehend how fiat money is the ultimate scam, how Bitcoin was created to fight corruption; how it is up to society to declare what is currency; and how Bitcoin is the hardest, real money.

      Or, maybe, you are just part of the subjugators; that which Bitcoin was created to rebel against.

    26. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      Because bitcoin is pseudo-anonymous, and once I tie your identity to your wallet (like, having you pay your tax bill via BTC) I can now look at all transactions with that wallet and see what you did. Bitcoin - blockchains in general - rely upon 100% transparency AND traceability of all transactions, so connecting you to a wallet once has now connected you to every transaction of that wallet.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    27. Re: Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's a great way to figure out who didn't pay gains taxes on their bitcoin.

    28. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      What was once OAKSTAR of the NSA can now be done at the state level :)
      "The NSA Worked To “track Down” Bitcoin Users, Snowden Documents Reveal" https://theintercept.com/2018/... (March 21 "2018)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    29. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by BoogieChile · · Score: 1

      Or Tennessee...

    30. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Most likely reality, a major Ohio business douche buried himself in worthless bitcoin and paid off a lobbyist to push this through so that bitcoin can be dumped. Watch out citizens from OHIO you are about to get butt blasted by speculative bitcoin trades, wow, I can't see how the SEC can accept it, in terms of the security of the assets of a state. The state can buy fuck all with the bitcoin and will become a major holder and seller, basically selling down the value of the asset it buys or hoarding it to total collapse.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    31. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      how Bitcoin was created to fight corruption

      And to what extent has it succeeded at this worthy goal?

    32. Re:Just when you thought it couldn't get worse... by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 1

      > I can now look at all transactions with that wallet and see what you did.

      What is a "wallet" in your mind? Do you realize that there is no such thing as a "wallet" on the public part of the blockchain ?

      There is no way to start from a single address and determine which other addresses belong to a wallet or not.

      Modern wallet software will not re-use any addresses, so its generally not possible to determine much of anything much else about the person or wallet beyond that one single address.

      There are forensic tools which attempt to do so; but they only work on older wallets or other decrepit cases.

      You are flat out wrong, and should retract your dis-informational posts.

  6. Unbelievably stupid by bblb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is almost certainly going to be ruinous for Ohio's bottom line. I highly doubt anyone associated with the Ohio treasury is as involved and up to speed on crypto transactions as they would need to be to avoid such a volatile currency blowing up in their faces.

    1. Re:Unbelievably stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh please, Ohio couldn't get any more morally or fiscally bankrupt if they imported a new government from Illinois.

    2. Re:Unbelievably stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You actually think they're going hold the payment in bitcoin? They're using bitpay, it's going to converted to fiat the moment the payment is made.

    3. Re:Unbelievably stupid by stinerman · · Score: 2

      Mandel did not run for re-election, so he's out of a job in about a month. It may go away right then and there.

      Also, this sounds a lot like "you pay your taxes in Bitcoin and we will turn around and convert that to cash". The person paying their taxes isn't going to get a bill for 0.53BTC and then the treasury is going to hold onto them in perpetuity. Everything is going to be dollar denominated and the conversion rate will be on the spot. Today you might need to pay 0.53BTC and tomorrow it might be 0.60 and next week it might be 0.47 to meet your dollar denominated tax bill.

    4. Re:Unbelievably stupid by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

      as they would need to be to avoid such a volatile currency blowing up in their faces.

      Blowing up how? If you're worried that it'll devalue while they hold it, don't; they'll cash it right away. What else you worried about?

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    5. Re:Unbelievably stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, someone in charge in the Ohio govt. is highly involved in Bitcoin, and needs the price to go up.

    6. Re:Unbelievably stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardly. I'd be surprised if they receive even $100k in payments through Bitcoin. Then they'll maybe make a substantial loss on that amount, but it still won't be much in the scheme of things. It's more a publicity stunt than anything else.

    7. Re: Unbelievably stupid by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Right. They abstracted thier currency...a very good thing.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    8. Re:Unbelievably stupid by MentalBrief · · Score: 1

      This is almost certainly going to be ruinous for Ohio's bottom line. I highly doubt anyone associated with the Ohio treasury is as involved and up to speed on crypto transactions as they would need to be to avoid such a volatile currency blowing up in their faces.

      The problem with Crypto is that is not stable enough to be consider as a day to day currency, as we are still years away from that point to happen.

    9. Re:Unbelievably stupid by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Wait.

      You're reacting to this story as if every goddam citizen of Ohio owns bitcoin.

      I'm a betting man, and I'll wager that there are WAY more people who just don't bother to pay taxes than there are people who own (and will pay using) bitcoin.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    10. Re:Unbelievably stupid by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      In any case, the theoretical delay time begins with ten minutes to post to the blockchain and at what cost to both parties?

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    11. Re:Unbelievably stupid by bblb · · Score: 2

      For one, there's a transaction cost that they'll need to bear... but the larger issue, as mentioned, is that it's very unlikely they'll be able to adequately manage the volatility without losing money. Last week, bitcoin lost a third of it's value, this after it's value has already plummeted over 80%... that's the type of volatility we're talking about. Bitcoin can take massive losses day to day, Ohio doesn't employ anyone who's going to monitor this 24/7 so payments taken today can be worth a significant percentage less come tomorrow when they show up to work and try to cash in. Ohio can't afford to lose 1/3rd of it's tax revenue because of ill timed transactions. There's zero advantage to do it and enormous risk. Stupid move.

    12. Re:Unbelievably stupid by bblb · · Score: 1

      Agree, 100%

    13. Re:Unbelievably stupid by bblb · · Score: 1

      Introducing this much volatility into any percentage of their revenue is a mistake. Ohio isn't exactly overflowing with surplus tax revenue... they failed to meet revenue expectations for 11 of 12 months in 2017.

    14. Re:Unbelievably stupid by KitFox · · Score: 1

      I also like the opportunity cost:

      "I paid 2 BTC for my state taxes and I'm glad I did, because they'd be worth $10 now if I kept them."

      "I paid 2 BTC for my state taxes and I'm sad I did, because they'd be worth $10,000,000 now if I kept them."

      --

      @Whee

    15. Re:Unbelievably stupid by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      People who don't pay taxes via fiat aren't going to pay using bitcoin.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    16. Re:Unbelievably stupid by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

      I'd think they wouldn't even have a human monitoring it; they'll just cash in btc for dollars the instant they're paid. I agree that I don't see a notable functional value add to their doing this in the context of paying taxes, but they're doing it for the symbolic value, sending the message that they're tech savvy, or at least not luddites. I happen to appreciate the sentiment behind that message, and I hope it works for them; but I understand that not everybody will choose to see things that way.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    17. Re:Unbelievably stupid by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Yep, and the probability of no change at all is within a Plank unit.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    18. Re:Unbelievably stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I don't understand either, why is that person worrying about Ohio's bottom line? The biggest losers should be the people holding bitcoin for tax payments or holding bitcoin for any reason.

      If the taxpayer just pays spot prices for bitcoin right when taxes are calculated/due, give it to the state electronically, and then they turn it back into cash the entire process is completely pointless

    19. Re:Unbelievably stupid by bblb · · Score: 1

      Which is why people who don't pay taxes aren't a relevant part of the discussion as to how and why accepting payments via bitcoin will be a detriment to revenue... I know it's hard but try and keep up with the rest of the class.

    20. Re:Unbelievably stupid by bblb · · Score: 1

      They'll still be hit with transaction costs that vary creating instability in revenue and they still have the potential for loss from second to second with an automated transaction... there'll still need to be a transaction that takes some time and bitcoin value changes constantly. There only really exists a potential for them to lose, particularly if they're not planning this as a way to hold the assets counting on an eventual rebound or gain.

    21. Re:Unbelievably stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite right. If they really meant it, they would pay state employees in Bitcoin, and ultimately, decouple from USD fiat all together. Now, THAT, would be a revolt. Of course, the Government has a monopoly on violence, so.. tyranny prevails.

    22. Re:Unbelievably stupid by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Try posting with class. My post is in context. Go back and read up.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    23. Re:Unbelievably stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly doubt anyone associated with the Ohio treasury is as involved and up to speed on crypto transactions as they would need to be to avoid such a volatile currency blowing up in their faces.

      They're using BitPay, dumbass. Basically straight from BTC to cash.

    24. Re:Unbelievably stupid by sheramil · · Score: 1

      Mandel did not run for re-election, so he's out of a job in about a month.

      Sounds to me like when the IT guy gets fired and he changes all the passwords and leaves an open can of sardines inside the aircon vent before they escort him from the building.

    25. Re: Unbelievably stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gain is being able to identify the owners of bitcoin wallets so they can be taxed.

    26. Re:Unbelievably stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You actually think they're going hold the payment in bitcoin? They're using bitpay, it's going to converted to fiat the moment the payment is made.

      Except even that's not guaranteed. There are plenty of tales of fraud on the exchanges. Getting your bitcoins paid out in US Dollars, Euros or Pounds Sterling is by no means a sure thing. In fact, it's downright shady in most cases. Ohio is going to get burned here. It's not a question of if but when.

    27. Re:Unbelievably stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with Crypto is that is not stable enough to be consider as a day to day currency, as we are still years away from that point to happen.

      In my opinion it will never happen because crypto currencies offer no real advantages, at least to legitimate legal transactions, over existing currencies controlled by governments and issued through their centralized banking systems. We already had electronic transactions, electronic trading and clearing, online and in person banking, credit and everything else financial fully implemented in all possible variations and nuances before crypto currencies were even invented. These systems have room for improvement sure, but you don't need crypto currencies to do that. Crypto currencies always will have their niche for people who want to transact against the wishes of governments and are willing to put up with substantial hassles to do that but almost nobody else will bother in the long run. It's just too damn inconvenient and slow compared to more conventional financial services and it always will be. The problems with money are economic, not technical, so technology cannot solve them apart from economics.

    28. Re:Unbelievably stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they're using a payment processor. Bitpay in this case. They send an invoice denominated in dollars to BitPay, who computes on the spot the equivalent Bitcoin, accepts it from the taxpayer, and credits Ohio with the exact dollar amount of the taxes due (minus a small, say 1%, processing fee). Bitpay takes all the volatility risk, as well as technical complexity (that's precisely their business). It's like accepting Mastercard or Visa as a payment processor, but with lower fees (3% is typical for credit cards) and less risk (for the merchant, no chargebacks).

    29. Re:Unbelievably stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think they're carrying any volatility risk? They're still getting payed in dollars, and Bitpay is taking the risk.

    30. Re:Unbelievably stupid by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

      They'll still be hit with transaction costs that vary creating instability in revenue

      Transaction costs are known up front, and I'm sure they'll simply have the payer cover those.

      and they still have the potential for loss from second to second with an automated transaction... there'll still need to be a transaction that takes some time and bitcoin value changes constantly. There only really exists a potential for them to lose

      You're right that fluctuations may cause transactions to go through with slightly different values than those intended, but you're wrong to say they can only lose. Fluctuations are in general random, and on average will result in neither loss nor gain. And if things are on a long downward slope like they are right now (coming off the "speculation" nuttiness), they can simply add a small additional fee for the payer for that too.

      There's really nothing hard about making this work.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    31. Re:Unbelievably stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is almost certainly going to be ruinous for Ohio's bottom line. I highly doubt anyone associated with the Ohio treasury is as involved and up to speed on crypto transactions as they would need to be to avoid such a volatile currency blowing up in their faces.

      Ohio is never going to touch these coins. The tax payer gives bitcoin to BitPay who gives dollars to Ohio. Volatility is BitPay's problem. This is how it has worked every time someone has a PR stunt about taking digital currency.

    32. Re:Unbelievably stupid by bblb · · Score: 1

      Did you mean to type "with the class" or was my post not classy enough for you? No, your post wasn't in context. No one anywhere was discussing people not paying taxes except for you. You randomly brought up your irrelevant opinion that more people aren't paying taxes than will be paying taxes with BTC... then you randomly doubled down with a second irrelevant opinion that people who aren't paying taxes with fiat currency won't begin paying taxes with crypto currency. Everybody else is on one topic, whether allowing people to pay in crypto is good or bad... the only person who's gone off in left field is you, kiddo. So, again, try and keep up with the rest of the class and save the strawman arguments for Facebook.

    33. Re:Unbelievably stupid by bblb · · Score: 1

      What they can do is a vastly different thing than what they're likely to do... and each of the things they "can" do also incurs a cost. There's no benefit to this. It's a sad attempt to appear to be forward thinking by accepting something that won't reasonably be a valid currency for years yet. Everything about this adds to the their overhead and it does nothing to save them money or encourage new revenue.

    34. Re:Unbelievably stupid by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      TL;DR

      TFS and TFA are about paying taxes with bitcoin. That opens the door for alternatives of paying by fiat or not paying at all.

      Keep your eye on the ball. It's the little round thing.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    35. Re:Unbelievably stupid by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

      I'd agree that squinted at from the right light, it may rise in some's opinion to "objectionable". But "unbelievably stupid" seems overboard.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    36. Re:Unbelievably stupid by bblb · · Score: 1

      No... that doesn't open the door for not paying at all! Are you daft? Not paying is tax evasion. But I guess if a small paragraph is TL:DR for you, it's unreasonable to expect you to comprehend anything like basic logic and reasoning. Better luck next time.

    37. Re:Unbelievably stupid by bblb · · Score: 1

      Fair enough... but it's entirely unreasonable to adopt additional expense strictly for the sake of appearing cutting edge, especially for Ohio. I could see California doing something this ridiculous, maybe even New York, and it still wouldn't make sense but for Ohio it's just stupid imo.

    38. Re:Unbelievably stupid by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      TL;DR

      OK, just kidding that time.

      So, you're saying tax evasion, as an option, is off the table?

      How does the introduction of bitcoin cause that?

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    39. Re:Unbelievably stupid by bblb · · Score: 1

      I'm saying that tax evasion isn't relevant to the discussion of whether accepting bitcoin as a payment option for those not evading taxes is a good idea or not.

    40. Re:Unbelievably stupid by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Ever notice that long-thread response character counts are shaped like an inverted polyhedron in which the base is a polygon and all lateral faces are triangles?

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    41. Re:Unbelievably stupid by bblb · · Score: 1

      I love lamp.

  7. Just Another "Everything Still OK" Attempt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just another attempt to make the public think "Bitcoin is ok; there is nothing to worry!"
    (Thanx to Bitcoin shill(s) successfully infiltrated Ohio government!)

    Bitcoin & all its offspring (alt-coins) are DYING!
    Lying to yourself (& pretending everything is ok) will not change the reality!

    So, to all bitcoin/cryptocurrency HODLers:
    Sell ASAP!!!
    (Unless you want to end up w/ zero money in the end!!!)

  8. Manipulation by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

    For many enthusiasts, part of the appeal of crypto has been the very fact that these currencies are not backed by governments. That makes it harder for politicians to manipulate currencies to their own ends, they say.

    Who needs the government to manipulate your currency when speculators already do so with tumultuous and unpredictable swings in value every day?

  9. Queue the standard arguments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monopoly money! Pyramid Scheme! Monopoly Money!

    If you say the mantras enough times, you'll go into a nice trance state and the next story will be ready soon after.

    There's certainly stupid beliefs on both sides. The orthodox crypto-nerds think crypto-currency is just around the corner from replacing traditional currency. The Slashdot crown all thinks it's pure smoke and mirrors. The reality is somewhere between those two extremes.

    So far the killer-app of crypto currency is selling drugs over the internet, and capital flight. I don't really count "nutty speculation" as much of a killer app.
    You don't have to like the above two functions, but you should admit they're usages of crypto-currency that actually exist, and likely will never go away.

    1. Re: Queue the standard arguments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cue!!! Motherfucker, it is CUE

      eat shit!!!!!

    2. Re:Queue the standard arguments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Need proof it's "Monopoly Money"? December 2017, Bitcoin was worth about $20,000 US. Late November 2018, Bitcoin is worth about $4,000 US. It's a scam and useless for day-to-day transactions. It would be like doing day-to-day transactions with stock certificates.

      Nice try there Sparky.

    3. Re: Queue the standard arguments... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      1 bitcoin is always 1 bitcoin. It's relation to a basket of goods only exists through the dollar as a proxy. People are still sniffing dollars and everyone gets mad at bitcoin? WTF?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    4. Re: Queue the standard arguments... by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

      From a quick google search...

      As a noun, a cue is either a signal or a piece of sporting equipment. As a verb, it refers to the act of signaling someone, or the act of striking a ball in billiards games. As a noun, a queue is a lineup of people or other things. As a verb, queue means to line something up or to form a line.

      The GP's use of queue seems quite apropos. Though both are acceptable.

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    5. Re: Queue the standard arguments... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      1 bitcoin is always 1 bitcoin. It's relation to a basket of goods only exists through the dollar as a proxy. People are still sniffing dollars and everyone gets mad at bitcoin? WTF?

      Because if not for 'the dollar as a proxy' you wouldn't be able to trade your 1's and 0's for that basket of goods.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    6. Re: Queue the standard arguments... by Megol · · Score: 1

      So you and the AC thinks the arguments are ordered, I don't agree.

  10. Up Next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ohio bankrupt after BitCoin collapse.

    Federal government launches investigation.

    Trump tweets; 'What the actual fuck?'

  11. Wait,that's bitcoin's appeal? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    I thought the appeal behind bitcoin was supposed to be it's anonymous (really pseudonymous). I thought gold was supposed to be the "I don't trust fiat currency" asset.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
    1. Re:Wait,that's bitcoin's appeal? by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      Bitcoin isn't anonymous, or even pseudo anonymous. I"m pretty sure that is the #1 answer in the FAQ.

    2. Re:Wait,that's bitcoin's appeal? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      It's not anonymous, but people think it is. It is pseudonymous, but tying pseudoidentity to real identity isn't that hard.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:Wait,that's bitcoin's appeal? by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Actually, when it comes to being anonymous or even pseudonymous it's worse than checks and credit/debit card transactions. Say, I buy 10 kilos of blow and pay with a personal check, a very stupid thing to do. There are laws in place that prevent the local bacon brigade from simply going down to the bank and digging through the books till they find something. They have to go through procedures, get warrants, and have probable cause. Then they narrow their search to specific parameters indicated in the warrant. The banks also have ass loads of lawyers to make sure such searches are kept with in the law. Basically the police can't say to the bank "we want all your records for this date."

      You have no such protections with bitcoin. The records are completely public. The police can and have searched the block chain for crimes, and nothing prevents them from doing so.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    4. Re:Wait,that's bitcoin's appeal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no such protections with bitcoin. The records are completely public. The police can and have searched the block chain for crimes, and nothing prevents them from doing so.

      It's amusing to see people's reactions when they find out that a tech which they don't understand is actually tracking everything they do, cannot be deleted, and totally screws their privacy. What did they think was going to happen? Maybe Zuckerberg was right about them after all, they're dumb fucks.

  12. Re:BREAKING: OHIO BANKRUPT, Treasurer fleeing on f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get where you are coming from, what with the volatility of bitcoin, but I suspect being able to tie an individual bitcoin wallet with an individual tax payer more than makes up for any shortfalls as a result of delaying cashing out.

    Oh sure, one could have multiple wallets and could make sure to not directly transfer anything between the two, but how many people are really going to bother taking those steps?

  13. They aren't taking bitcoin by Ries · · Score: 2

    They are not taking bitcoin, they are taking USD. Some pay provider converts the coin to USD and hands them over. This would be like saying you can pay with beanie babies if the same provider would take them as payment.

    1. Re: They aren't taking bitcoin by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      They are probably doing it cheaper than Visa.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  14. And in other news ... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

    Michigan agrees to accept Beanie Babies as tax payments. Colorado agrees to accept Magic Trading Cards. And in a surprise move, California will accept any baseball card printed prior to 1965.

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    1. Re:And in other news ... by PPH · · Score: 1

      When can I pay my taxes in Yapese Rai?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  15. Re:BREAKING: OHIO BANKRUPT, Treasurer fleeing on f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wallets are free, criminals already do this with cell phones and ID's and coin wallet thefts, so that's probably exactly who. And given that addition to the volatility... Gov's could lose a lot of money real fast. Taxpayer money. That'd be bad.

  16. This is a good thing - free from US banks by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1

    It means I can pay taxes without having to use the US banks. The US banking system is horrible at the best of times. If you happen to be black or live in an undesirable part of the USA it is out right abusive. Crypto currencies don't make a lot of sense in most countries but in Venezuela, Zimbabwe or the USA they do. So thank you Ohio.

    1. Re: This is a good thing - free from US banks by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Agreed. This is awesome.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  17. tech-savvy and forward-thinking by magzteel · · Score: 1

    "So Ohio, and its treasurer Josh Mandel, see embracing them as a way to signal that the state is tech-savvy and forward-thinking."

    Like Orange County California, I bet
    https://www.investopedia.com/a...

    Just like Robert Citron, Josh is playing with other people's money. He should get smacked down fast.

  18. This is how bad things have become for Bitcoin by timholman · · Score: 3, Informative

    This story is getting a lot of hype from the BTC evangelists. Of course, the truth is that Ohio is only accepting dollars for taxes. The Ohio treasury is using BitPay to convert BTC immediately into dollars, minus whatever fees are charged for the conversion. Unless you've already had BTC in your possession prior to 2017, what's the point?

    The question that BTC evangelists hope you won't ask next is "Who else is still accepting Bitcoin for payments?" Here's a list of companies as tallied last month: https://unblock.net/companies-...

    You might recognize maybe half a dozen names from that list. As a means of conducting day-to-day retail transactions, BTC has dropped off the map. It is rarely even mentioned anymore.

    1. Re:This is how bad things have become for Bitcoin by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      There are 5 places within 30 miles from my location and all of them are Chinese restaurants.

    2. Re:This is how bad things have become for Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That list is outdated. Expedia is listed, but Expedia no longer accepts bitcoin: https://cointelegraph.com/news/confirmed-travel-booking-giant-expedia-has-quietly-removed-bitcoin-payment-option

    3. Re:This is how bad things have become for Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And "accepting Bitcoin" is just that - the business accepts it. Doesn't mean that any significant volume of their revenue is Bitcoin.
      In fact, if it were, they'd be screwed right now.

    4. Re:This is how bad things have become for Bitcoin by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe... There are 5 places within 30 miles from my location and all of them are fronts for money laundering.

    5. Re:This is how bad things have become for Bitcoin by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It means credibility. It's like when a platform lands a major client, like Chrysler or Hilton or BP or something. A state government is a pretty good win. I'd put it in my company's advertising. It has the effect of convincing people, "I'm not a joke" or "I'm not a small-time operation".

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  19. Not stupid, cunning by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    It might not be as stupid as you think. You see when you use the bitcoin to pay your taxes which are denominated in dollars you will trigger a capital gains tax. So next year they will know exactly how many bitcoin you "sold" to pay this year's taxes and if you do not have a capital gains entry for those coins then they know exactly whom to audit!

  20. How do they know your basis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do they know your basis?

    Are independent transactions linked? Serial transactions? What if you sell some bitcoin today, buy some tomorrow and use that to pay your taxes?

    Wouldn't that obscure any so-called capital gains?

    Also, if US currency was deflationary would the government be allowed to collect capital gains taxes on your bank account? Bitcoin is (nominally) a currency, so do capital gains actually apply to changes in its value?

    1. Re:How do they know your basis? by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      They will learn the details from the audit.

      Foreign currency triggers gains/loss when converted to USD, I don't see why bitcoin would be any different.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:How do they know your basis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is (nominally) a currency, so do capital gains actually apply to changes in its value?

      GBP, EUR, CAD, AUD, and JPY are actual currencies. If you buy them, and later sell them at a gain, what do you suppose happens?

      If you guessed that you incurred a tax liability you'd (probably*) be correct.

      Why do you think a gain on BTC is any different?

      *Always consult your tax advisor.

    3. Re:How do they know your basis? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      How do they know your basis?

      You are required to tell them that when you fill it in on your tax form. The only way to obscure this would be to deliberately lie on your tax form and the penalty for doing that is going to be a lot, lot worse (probably jail) compared to just "forgetting" to declare your Bitcoin transactions.

      Also, if US currency was deflationary would the government be allowed to collect capital gains taxes on your bank account?

      No, provided it is a USD bank account because 1 USD will always be worth 1 USD and since the US government requires the buying and selling price of property to always be given in USD then there will never be a change in the value and hence no capital gain or loss even though 1 USD may buy you more, or less, over time.

  21. Short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there some way to short the economy of Ohio? I've got the inside track that their treasurer may be an unstable lunatic.

  22. Re:BREAKING: OHIO BANKRUPT, Treasurer fleeing on f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wallets are free, criminals already do this with cell phones and ID's and coin wallet thefts, so that's probably exactly who.

    I didn't ask who would do that, I asked how many would do that. Sure, some people will do that, but I suspect enough people won't bother such that government will still come out ahead even with bitcoin volatility, from going after people for not reporting all of the money they made trading bitcoin.

  23. Unconstitutional by Savantissimo · · Score: 2

    States can't make any thing other than gold or silver coin a tender in payment of debts. The legal dodge is that the states aren't the Fed or the Treasury, so it isn't they that are making the requirement of transacting in fiat Federal Reserve Note dollars, so the constitutional restriction does not apply. This dodge fails if a state decides to accept something else as a tax debt payment.

    Arguably a necessary characteristic of money is being able to pay your taxes in it, for instance the success of Worgl stampscript (negative interest currency) experiment of the '30s came largely from the local government accepting it as tax payment. The local government also issued it, which gave them the reason to accept it. The negative-interest aspect (had to buy stamps to affix to keep a currency note current) led to a huge increase in the velocity of money as people wished to avoid paying the stamps, and also a huge move toward long-term investment as negative interest rates turned the present-value calculation upside down, making money worth more the further in the future it would be taken out, rather than future returns being discounted.

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    1. Re:Unconstitutional by suutar · · Score: 1

      it sounds like they're not taking bitcoin themselves, they're just willing to connect to a bitcoin-dollar exchange to make your transactions simpler. They only wind up getting dollars.

    2. Re:Unconstitutional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      States can't make any thing other than gold or silver coin a tender in payment of debts

      Of course they can.
      They can accept ears of corn as payment of debt and/or payment of taxes to the state.

      What they can't do is refuse the US dollar for either of those things, and they can't force anyone else to accept anything except the US dollar for payment of debt.

      Adding an additional payment option is fine so long as it is just that, an additional option. Which is exactly the case here.

      Also they can't force anyone else to accept more than the US dollar for debts, including bitcoin, however that too is the case here.

      Your stampscript example even would be legal. It would be stupid, but legal.
      People would simply refuse to use stampscript ever and continue paying taxes in USD like before, thus there would be no problem for anyone that stampscript existed or was accepted.
      It would just be ignored, and so any problems wouldn't be problems.

    3. Re:Unconstitutional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it sounds like they're not taking bitcoin themselves, they're just willing to connect to a bitcoin-dollar exchange to make your transactions simpler. They only wind up getting dollars.

      And guess who's going to be on the hook for penalties and interest if the transaction falls through or doesn't clear on time to pay the taxes? You, that's who. Only an idiot would use this method to pay his taxes.

  24. The Alt-Right Loves Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The alt-right pitches bitcoin, many of them hate the government and the fed, same with the crazier libertarians.

    I haven't lived in Ohio for decades, but I suspect the folks that are doing this are fans of the alt-right twitter trolls and websites.

    I believe bitcoin is down today.

    I think they've discussed this in other states as well.

  25. Perfect timing! by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    Ooopsy, only a year late to the party :)

  26. Re:IMPERSONATING ME AGAIN? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just close your web browser. Delete /. from your bookmarks. Use some other community where everybody loves you. How fucking hard is it to work that out?

  27. other cynical readings by epine · · Score: 1

    If there's any practical gap between the nominal value and the cash liquidity of Bitcoin, Ohio had better brace itself for a stampede of Bitcoin payments.

    If there's any practical gap, this might be a cynical move on the part of some wealthy Ohio speculator with political connections.

    Most likely this is some person who scored a Bitcoin windfall and now wishes to return to an actual cash position at face value, who increasingly anticipates a Bitcoin implosion any day now.

    1. Re:other cynical readings by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Ohio isn't taking bitcoin directly, they just have a vendor who will take [they don't care how much bitcoin] and gives them [$ you owe[. Your taxes are denominated in dollars.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:other cynical readings by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      of course, no sane government would take taxes in any so-called cryptocurrency.

      it is a fad and scam, and it's running out of gas. don't be a bagholder.

  28. How does it work in practice? by fred6666 · · Score: 1

    Let say I earned $100k this year. How much do I owe in BTC? Can I play the volatility at my advantage?

    1. Re:How does it work in practice? by feedayeen · · Score: 1

      Your side is USD -> Middlemen -> BTC then Ohio is going to go BTC -> Middlemen -> USD. The middlemen in both transactions will be a combination of your banks, and the exchange provider who is commiting to buy and sell at some fixed price at a moment. Increased volatility puts that exchange middleman in greater risk so it doesn't help you.

    2. Re:How does it work in practice? by jezwel · · Score: 1

      You owe your taxes in US$. Uncle Sam wants to see that amount show up in the IRS coffers, so he doesn't care whether it cost you 1,10,100, or 1000 BTC to get that amount there.

    3. Re:How does it work in practice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohio asks bitpay for X USD and bitpay turns around and asks you for the market value equivalent of BTC. When you cough up the BTC (usually you have a limited time to do so at a locked in rate) bitpay gives exactly X USD to Ohio (minus their fee, like with credit cards) and takes all the volatility risk.

      The only opportunity to arbitrage would be to start the payment and then only pay if the price of BTC went down significantly in the allotted time. BTC is volatile, but not that volatile... Nothing you couldn't do better on the open market.

  29. IMPERSONATING ME AGAIN? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gweihir KNEW u IMPERSONATE me https://it.slashdot.org/commen... c6gunner proves it https://linux.slashdot.org/com... & forgot to SUBMIT AC & used his registered 'lusrname' (he tried to mock me both BEFORE & after I FAIRLY challenged him to show he's done better work - he had ZERO).

    I'd never "cry victim" to ne'er-do-wells (TROLLS, not all /.ers) either.

    U EVEN HELPED ME https://science.slashdot.org/c... (& then realizing it you quit trying to make me look bad via what you thought were lies on hosts as "ME" IN YOUR IMPERSONATIONS of me e.g. https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... on speculative execution attack: Hosts PREVENT 'EM, joke's on you)

    APK

    P.S.=> 2nd to last link's KILLING U THAT U HELPED ME & got me to see if hosts stop portsmash/meltdown/spectre & yes - hosts WORK on 'em - U LOSE + FAIL a PORTFILTER TEST https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...

  30. Bitcoin bailout soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US Tax payer needs to be on the hook to bailout bitcoin one way or another. Only then will America be great again! #MAGA

  31. Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Football...Ohio should just stick to kicking Michigan's *** in football every year. That's basically their only remaining industry at this point. That and opiod treatment centers.

    1. Re:Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't always talk to Ohio State graduates, but when I do, I tell them I want large fries.

  32. If I owe the IRS in April by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will be paying in Dogecoin.

  33. Re:BREAKING: OHIO BANKRUPT, Treasurer fleeing on f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except the theft = scalable, not tending to be limited to per-person or per-diem or any limitation like that. Accepting BT != catching all BT related tax fraud, that's an entirely different concept. I don't know how you confuse them.

  34. They're trolling by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure they did it solely to shut up that guy who always posts that "Bitcoin isn't a real currency because you can't pay your taxes with it". ;^)

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    1. Re:They're trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't pay your taxes with it. Using bitpay doesn't count. The government is not accepting bitcoin directly.

  35. Ohio thinks Bitcoin has bottomed by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    They are hoping their tax revenue will sextuple when Bitcoin goes to new highs.

  36. Re:BREAKING: OHIO BANKRUPT, Treasurer fleeing on f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are those criminals paying taxes?
    If they aren't they are completely irrelevant to the case.

  37. Trump won Ohio in 2016.... by DeanOh · · Score: 1

    Not ready for cryptocurrency. Or any science at all.