Slashdot Mirror


Latest Windows 10 Update Breaks Windows Media Player, Win32 Apps In General (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: The important data loss bug that interrupted the rollout of the Windows 10 October 2018 Update, version 1809, may be fixed, but it turns out there are plenty of other weird problems with the release. As spotted by Paul Thurrott, the update also breaks the seek bar in Windows Media Player when playing "specific files." Microsoft does promise to fix the bug, but the timeframe is vaguely open-ended: it will be "in an upcoming release."

Also in the "how did that happen" category comes another bug: some Win32 programs can't be set as the default program for a given file type. So if you want certain files to always open in Notepad, for example, you're currently out of luck. A fix for this is promised by the end of the month. Setting default program associations is something that's been in Windows for 20-something years, so it's a little alarming that it should be broken. On top of this, there continue to be complaints that Windows 10 version 1809 doesn't work with iCloud, and machines with the iCloud client are currently blacklisted to prevent them from receiving the 1809 update. It's not immediately clear whose fault this one is -- it could be Microsoft's, but it's also possible that Apple is to blame.

16 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. Windows shouldn't be a service! by zidium · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Windows just shouldn't be a service!

    Leave it alone and give us big big upgrades every couple of years.... That's fine and acceptable and what we're used to.

    This autoupdating crap means that any given morning, my box may be broken in very strange ways, with little if any perceivable benefit.

    --
    Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    1. Re:Windows shouldn't be a service! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This autoupdating crap means that any given morning, my box may be broken in very strange ways, with little if any perceivable benefit.

      Apparently the great lumbering beast that is Microsoft has now decided they're agile, and they are willing to risk their reputation and the quality of their OS to push out new bullshit features.

      This is why I refused to let my Windows 8.1 machine upgrade to Win 10, and why my next 'Windows' machine will be a pure VM on a Linux host -- one in which I severely limit its network access.

      Sorry, Microsoft ... it's my fucking machine, you don't get to recklessly upgrade whenever you choose and break my desktop.

      I don't know why MS is so insistent on Shit as a Service, but the reality it, they're just producing shit these days. This is, what, 3 or 4 consecutive weeks they've fucked up people's machines with this crap?

      Fuck that, I'm not taking their steaming pile of shit beta builds or accepting telemetry and ads in my machine.

      I predict MS is going to seriously lose customers over shit like this.

    2. Re:Windows shouldn't be a service! by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Shit as a Service" is maybe the best, most accurate description I've ever read about Microsoft's current operating system.

      When my Windows 7 goes tango uniform, it sure as hell won't be replaced with anything from Microsoft.

    3. Re:Windows shouldn't be a service! by Megol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One is a bug and the other a trend.

    4. Re:Windows shouldn't be a service! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you don't like how Windows 10 behaves then switch to another operating system. Anything less is rewarding Microsoft for bad behavior.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    5. Re:Windows shouldn't be a service! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Informative

      it's MY OS, I paid for it, and I want it on MY disk, thanks.

      Wrong. You paid for a license to be able to use their OS and given the EULA you agreed to, they can change anything they want at any point and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it. I'm not trying to be mean, I'm simply pointing out the harsh reality of the situation.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    6. Re:Windows shouldn't be a service! by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Automatic updates are, in principle, not much of a problem. I have run Debian (w/o systemd) with automatic updates every 3 days for about 15 years now, both desktop and server, with one real problem in the whole time. Sure, major version updates are still manual, but everything else is not. In addition, I have some of my own boot-scripts in there and use self-compiled custom kernels. So this can be done reliably even with no-so-standard configurations.

      The problem here is that MS cannot support this model, as their product is far too badly made and they do not have the technological expertise to stay on top of things. In addition, they are slowly becoming less relevant (mostly because of Android) and seem to be somewhat panicked, with one bad decision following another and UI changes (WTF? Who wants UI changes? This is a tool!) that are supposed to "revolutionize" things, but in reality just make things worse.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  2. So I just need iCloud to prevent automatic updates by Goldenhawk · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's cool. I knew that eventually iCloud would be good for SOMETHING.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  3. Overheard at the Microsoft bar... by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    (Windows ME) "I will remain forever champion as the Worst Microsoft Operating System!"

    (Windows 10) "Hold my beer."

    The Year of the Linux Desktop; brought to you by Windows Update.

    1. Re:Overheard at the Microsoft bar... by karlandtanya · · Score: 4, Funny

      (Windows ME) "I will remain forever champion as the Worst Microsoft Operating System!"

      (Windows 10) "Hold my beer."

      Microsoft BoB: "Pfft. Amateurs."

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  4. Not Apple to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > It's not immediately clear whose fault this one is -- it could be Microsoft's, but it's also possible that Apple is to blame.

    Nope. If an operating system breaks any userland program, it's always the operating system which should be blamed.

  5. Windows 10 news stories not sufficiently intense. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is my opinion that Microsoft's mis-management and abuse is not reported sufficiently. Joking may help people adjust.

    Microsoft is damaging customers and itself.

    Some of the many, many stories:

    Windows 10 is possibly the worst spyware ever made. "Buried in the service agreement is permission to poke through everything on your PC." (Aug. 4, 2015)

    Microsoft's Intolerable Windows 10 Aggression (May 27, 2016)

    Microsoft is infesting Windows 10 with annoying ads (March 17, 2017)

    Microsoft, stop sabotaging Windows 10. (March 21, 2017)

  6. Re:At this point if you told me by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ironically Windows 8.1? Is a really good OS and is IMHO heads and shoulders above Win 10 as its not constantly being broken by Microshit patches.

    Win 8.1 plus Classic Shell? Is Win 7 with better SSD support and faster boot times. I'll stick with 8.1 until it is no longer supported of Linux has full support for gaming thanks to Valve, I've seen enough of Win 10 shitting all over itself to know its not a good OS.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  7. That's a rather misleading statement. by jonadab · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > Setting default program associations is something that's
    > been in Windows for 20-something years

    This is... ok, not exactly outright wrong, but at least misleading.

    I mean, yes, twenty-some years ago, Windows had the ability to set program associations. But that implementation is not in any way related to the current one, except in the most general "there's a way to set program associations" sense that applies just as well to other operating systems.

    Microsoft's first implementation of this in Windows was in winfile.exe, which was deeply deprecated in Windows '95 and does not exist at all in any recent version of Windows. The second iteration, in the first version of Windows Explorer, involved the Windows registry and was somewhat more complicated in its implementation but still conceptually similar to the first version: for any given filename extension, you could specify one program that would be used to open it; and that was it. This got redone when Windows Explorer went through its little identity crisis ("Of course it's integrated with the web browser..." "What? Web browser? No, no, no."), leaving a legacy of associations based on things other than the filename extension (in addition to the ones that are based on extension), and at some point gained the ability for programs to register themselves at install time as _capable_ of handling a given file format, so the "Open With..." context menu could offer multiple options. Then the "set program access/defaults" wizard was added to let people specify which of the options should get the double-click action for certain important formats and tasks. That implementation, or a descendant of it, still exists in Windows 7 (I think; unless it was redone another time that I didn't notice) but was never ported over to Eight/Ten, which have their _own_ implementations of file associations, which have gone through changes repeatedly because, frankly, they're unnecessarily complex and thus buggy.

    But yeah, sure, just say this is a feature that's been there for twenty years and just suddenly broke unexpectedly. Reality is overrated.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  8. I think MS has lost control of their product by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As in they have managed to make it complex enough and have sacked or driven away enough good engineers that they really cannot make work well anymore. Sure, windows never worked very well, but this is a new quality of bad.

    Now, what do you do when you stupidly have let one OS maker get a quasi-monopoly and that maker loses it?

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  9. Wine for Windows? by MtHuurne · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe it's time to port Wine to Windows, so WIndows 10 users can run Win32 applications...