Slashdot Mirror


Google Hangouts For Consumers Will Be Shutting Down Sometime In 2020 (9to5google.com)

According to 9to5Google, Google Hangouts for consumers will be shutting down sometime in 2020. The news shouldn't come as too much of a surprise since Google essentially stopped development on the app more than a year ago. Thankfully, there are plenty of other Google messaging apps available, such as Allo, Duo, and Android Messages. From the report: Last spring, Google announced its pivot for the Hangouts brand to enterprise use cases with Hangouts Chat and Hangouts Meet, so the writing has been on the wall for quite some time regarding the Hangouts consumer app's demise. Meanwhile, Google has transitioned its consumer-facing messaging efforts to RCS 'Chat' and Android Messages following Allo's misadventures.

As mentioned, Hangouts as a brand will live on with G Suite's Hangouts Chat and Hangouts Meet, the former intended to be a team communication app comparable to Slack, and the latter a video meetings platform. Meanwhile, Google Voice calling, which was at first independent and then long integrated into Hangouts, was moved back out to its own redesigned app earlier this year. Interestingly, despite its forthcoming axing, Hangouts was one of a few apps to get early support for Android Auto's new MMS and RCS functionality, alongside Android Messages and WhatsApp.

83 comments

  1. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google kills everything, so finally glad to see this. Bring back Reader

    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised they haven't killed off Gmail and introduced 5 competing services in its place.

    2. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Google Wave, Inbox.

    3. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Google is killing off Gmail and introducing Wave and Inbox in its place?

      Seriously, you should learn how to read before engaging in a conversation.

  2. Good riddance by timrod · · Score: 1

    The only people who have been using Hangouts are spam bots who use it as a way of getting into people's gmail inboxes without actually sending an email. There's no easy opt-out either.

    1. Re:Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zoom is better anyway. The browser trash requires javascript GC... stop wasting electricity!

    2. Re:Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen brother! Keep on preaching the good word!

    3. Re:Good riddance by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      I use it as the easiest option for messaging without having to give out my cell phone #. It also keeps me from having to install non-native Android apps for IM, which tend to drain the battery a lot more quickly.

    4. Re:Good riddance by omnichad · · Score: 4, Informative

      No. I've been using it as my default messaging app since my Google Voice number is my primary number. I can send and reply to text messages from my computer with a full keyboard using the Hangouts Chrome app.

    5. Re: Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Hangouts is a replacement for Grand Central and Gizmo Voip. I can use Hangouts as a second number. Surely Google will have a VOIP app. If not, their new motto should be âoe Be Evilâ.

    6. Re:Good riddance by jimbo · · Score: 2

      I gave my kid an old phone without sim card so he can contact me anywhere with wifi. Hangouts is a lightweight messenger that doesn't require cell #, like most do. I guess Skype can do the same but most others require a number.

    7. Re:Good riddance by dejitaru · · Score: 2

      While I hate hangouts with a passion I found the diamond in the rough. I can have two google voice numbers and know exactly where it comes from. So I use the GV app that directly calls my fone for personal and hangouts with VOIP for business :)

    8. Re: Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use the google voice app on your phone and voice.google.com on a computer

    9. Re: Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The app is google voice, sign up for the beta and you can even make calls with just the app

    10. Re: Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you "guess" Skype is also an option? Yeah it's been the defacto too for 10 years and the reason why nobody ever bothered using Hangouts.

    11. Re: Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zoom Linux sucks. When I try and screen share, it doesn't show thumbnails, truncates window names to the point of being completely illegible and can't isolate it's list of possible windows to share to a single virtual desktop. It's like a guessing game. Oy also changes to some annoying micro window that forces itself to be stuck to every virtual desktop, if you switch displays and you can't make it go away. Being browser based, I wish it was browser based. If it doesn't work in terminal or a browser, I really don't want it on my workstations.

    12. Re:Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? Hangouts is non-native. The only "non-native" apps are the programs that are part of AOSP.

    13. Re: Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hangouts is the last working native instant messaging app on Android 2.3 Gingerbread. (The "You must Update" message can be bypassed by long-pressing the menu button.) That's for all the people who don't use WhatsApp, which will support Gingerbread until 2020 or thereabouts. Whereas Skype and all the others require a much newer version of Android. Wire, for example, needs at least Android 4.2.
       
      There's also Skype for Web, which can be accessed via Firefox, but Android Gingerbread supports only Firefox 47.0 or less, and Skype for Web wants Firefox 52 or newer. This means, that users must make extensive changes in about:config for each Skype and Microsoft-related domain necessary to run Skype for Web in order to mimic the Firefox 52 user agent string on all those domains. Coniguring all that is quite a bit of of work. And that's not everything: If a device is low-end, then Firefox will take its sweet time loading Skype for Web.

    14. Re: Good riddance by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Terrible experience by comparison

    15. Re: Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm doing that with no issues. But why doesn't Google allow Voice to be the default sms app? Was using Hangouts, but Voice has improved a lot, implementing pretty much everything Hangouts has. I have Messages just so I have a default app, but only use Voice

    16. Re:Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. This is going to suck if i dont get the same sort of features, across all platforms.

      its also nice to use hangouts for VoIP, when i need it.

  3. Hangouts is the only Google app that does VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hangouts is the only Google app that does VoIP. You can have a data only LTE phone and Hangouts together with Google Voice nuber makes it a fully functional phone that can send/receive calls and messages. Fully integrates with Apple's CallKit on iOS. I hear the integration is not as good on Andoid. Kind of ironic.

    So what will be replacement. Hopefully they will have all the functionality ported to Voice app by then.

    1. Re:Hangouts is the only Google app that does VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah--or simply voice calling from your desktop. I guess a feature I've used for the better part of a decade is going away.

    2. Re:Hangouts is the only Google app that does VoIP by crow · · Score: 1

      Yup. I use this to call home when travelling internationally when I have WiFi. It's very useful. I hope that continues to work.

    3. Re: Hangouts is the only Google app that does VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Google Voice Beta for Android has done VOIP for at least the last 6 months

  4. Is Google Interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What has google created in the last... say, 10 years..?

    Things that were amazing & cool, when they came out:
    * Google Search
    * Google Maps
    * Gmail

    The only thing that I can think of in addition... is... mayyyyybe "OK Google" ..?

    Other than that, I keep hearing that they are making something, then taking it back. Making something, then taking it back. Making something, then taking it back.

    I thought that Google Wave was interesting. Then that disappeared in a puff of smoke.

    Everything else I am seeing is on the order of new mechanisms for advertising, or tiny incremental improvements to something, or "we improved it by destroying it, so it won't bother you any more."

    1. Re:Is Google Interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing that I can think of in addition... is... mayyyyybe "OK Google" ..?

      Damn it. You've got to stop typing that so loud. You just activated all the speakers in range of my computer.

    2. Re:Is Google Interesting? by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      Personally, the main area of growth I've seen is that I rarely have to pick up my phone and use the keypad or, much of the time, even look at the screen anymore. I can and do accomplish almost everything conversationally. I set appointments, add things to lists, have lists read to me, send messages, perform all my navigation, make all calls, play music, start and stop my runs, set timers and query timers and alarms, set reminders both at times and locations, etc. conversationally. And I never have to worry whether the people I'm interacting with have some special proprietary or non-standard app or not like I see many others doing.

    3. Re:Is Google Interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is revolutionary technology! Or is it? Does it accomplish this by processing your voice locally on device?

    4. Re:Is Google Interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm,,, Android!

      I know they didn't start the project (they bought it), but Android wasn't a shipping product until Google turned it into one.

    5. Re:Is Google Interesting? by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      I wish it did. But, beggars can't be choosers.

      We seem to have thoroughly given up personal and home-based computing. Almost every decent app today is cloud-based, and the devices in our hands are just terminals. Personal SW innovation has stalled for so long that my mother can actually run today's programs including Win10 and Office on her 2006 vintage 17" Core Duo laptop with 4GB RAM. The only upgrade I've put in it is an SSD. That's a far cry from the days when the pace of progress required a 3 y/o PC to be re-tasked as a router or something.

      I'd love a return to a world where I felt justified to spend $3K on a home server and $2K on my desktop and $1K on displays every 3 years because what I had was totally obsolete.

      If Google sold the ability to set up a home server, run their software locally, and then use that as the basis for all of my phone's abilities no matter where I'm at, I would be willing to put down that kind of change instead of doing everything on cloud machines. That kind of move could reignite personal computing, probably opening the door to an explosion in AI hardware diversity that can't happen with the large datacenter approach to computing.

      All that said, I won't give up the capabilities I now have without a reasonably equal alternative. Yes, I know of the various open source projects trying to do things like this, have loaded some up, and found them to be less than alpha IMO.

      I also realize some phones are trying to do some of this on the phone, but I find that very distasteful. It adds a lot of cost to the phone and only benefits the phone. If I'm going to pay for that kind of AI, I won't it to benefit every device in every room in our home, our PCs, our vehicles, and all of our phones.

      The home server approach would balance my privacy concerns with my engineering sense of cost-effectiveness. That could probably also be cost-effectively augmented with a car-based server as the autos get more built-in AI.

    6. Re: Is Google Interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The initial release was over 10 years ago, about the same time as Chrome (the browser). I would say Cardboard which was 4 years ago but hasn't been developed.

    7. Re: Is Google Interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #1 - Google Maps was a rebrande PURCHASE, not something Google created.
      #2 - GMail has NEVER being "cool". Even from the beginning, it has being a "me too" service. A clone of what others created in the past.

    8. Re: Is Google Interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kubernetes

  5. Seems to make sense by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

    Started February 2015, so obviously 5 years later it shuts down.

    I guess data mining the video for their AI projects was harder than they thought.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  6. Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitions? by thebes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I use it for people I communicate with regularly because it doesn't matter where I am...laptop, phone, tablet, etc. I can send and receive messages and it doesn't make a difference. SMS in a browser is pretty flaky still, and has a tendency to become detached at inconvenient times, and doesn't always send immediately.

    I'm genuinely open to suggestions (I'm an android user, so no Apple only stuff) and Facebook messenger will be one of the last I consider.

  7. Back to skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Time to go back to skype I guess. Hangouts was the one app my family can use personally, and I can interact with in my corporate box. SO much for that convenience. Maybe I'll switch to something else.

  8. I haven't felt this sad... by Patent+Lover · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...since the end of Windows Phone.

    1. Re: I haven't felt this sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me it was when then shutdown Google+

      A part of me died that day.

    2. Re:I haven't felt this sad... by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      At least those Nokia Windows phones were tough:

      https://satwcomic.com/you-got-...

      https://www.digitaltrends.com/...

      TBH, they may not have been that bad if Google hadn't blocked them from running any Google services from a native app.

    3. Re:I haven't felt this sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft could have complained to U.S. anti-trust authorities about Google being uncompetitive wrt no YouTube on native apps, because YouTube is the major draw to anything. Google, on the other hand, could have countered, that the mobile version of YouTube is available anyway for web browsers (IE9, which came with Windows Phone 7).

  9. At least we can fall back to by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

    Google chat. thank goodness we can still use it! Oh....

  10. Thanks to google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First you shoved it down our throats. We liked gtalk. Then you abandon it.

    And why as a business would we want to use it??? You stopped development on it over a year ago!!! Itâ(TM)s not good enough for the plebes, so now your paying customers have to use it!?!?

    Asshats.

  11. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Same here; maybe Signal or Riot can get enough features by 2020 to be a decent replacement. The move to get the hell away from TIM silos as soon as possible is rapidly accelerating. Supposedly WebRTC is mostly usable now too; just needs a usability scaffold and directory.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  12. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telegram.

  13. Don't pay for any Google innovation! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    I appreciate that search is paid for selling our search terms to advertisers. If it were a product we paid for instead, Google would chicken out and cancel it after the first sales month that wasn't a new high.

    Remember how we used to hate it back in the nineteen hundreds when the US had only three TV networks, which had a habit of canceling any show that wasn't the national Neilsen leader by November? If Google had owned one of those networks back in the day, it would use the first dud show as an excuse to eliminate the whole concept of television - which its legal team could probably pull off.

  14. More focus needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We never really needed 20 chat platforms, just one that works well. Thus far, even Google chat worked, but there was nothing particularly special about it.

    They need to release a chat platform that integrates with VOIP phones and such too.

    1. Re:More focus needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Hangouts is not just chat. It is chat, voice (using real google voice number or direct to hangouts subscribers), video call, teleconferencing all happening over IP network. With apps that fully integrate into your phone (i.e. CallKit support on iOS) as well desktop client that works from your browser with no extra shit to be installed.

      They don't have anything that replaces all that functionality at this point, especially VoIP calling using Google Voice phone number.

    2. Re:More focus needed by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      There will never be one that works well until companies stop rolling their own and use a standard. The most important aspect of working well is not having to ask someone whether they have or can join a service.

      Google seems to finally be taking the high road by supporting RCS or "chat", the only viable SMS replacement I've heard of. It would be nice to see telecom standards for video calls come about too.

  15. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skype then...

  16. Pied Piper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't somebody please come up with something like Pied Piper video chat that works better than Google but isn't Google and that Google can't sue into oblivion or buy it out and shut it down? Oh, right. I just answered my own question.

  17. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by fred6666 · · Score: 1

    telegram still sucks, because it is based on phone number as an identifier

  18. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed. I even still make use of the XMPP support via Pidgin on my desktop. Matrix (the protocol behind Riot which a sibling already mentioned) looks promising, but I haven't tried it out myself yet.

  19. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

    Riot.im honestly has more features than Hangouts at this point, when I go back to message people on Hangouts for instance I tend to find myself surprised I can't just attach arbitrary files for example.

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  20. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

    I use Hangouts for pretty much all messaging. I rarely use my smartphone as a phone, and I don't really need data access, so only family members and a few close friends have my cell #. $15 of prepaid minutes usually lasts me a few months. So I won't use any messaging app/service that requires a cell carrier (or my cell #) for messaging.

    Even if I did have unlimited texts, I still wouldn't want to give my cell # out to everyone. If all the good options for using my email address for messaging vanish, I may see if I can set up a Google Voice # for messaging only (no calls, and no SMS to my cell #). With Google looking like they want to ditch everything for RCS, that may be the way to go.

  21. Federation by q4Fry · · Score: 1

    If you aren't willing to communicate with open protocols I can run on my own hardware, I don't really really want to talk to you anyway. XMPP, Matrix, good old email, and perhaps IRC. Randall will have to make a new Venn.

    1. Re:Federation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of us have customer and executive facing jobs.

      BOFH is a dead end. Virtually everything uses XMPP, but few plugins and clients are incompatible all the same. So lose the attitude.

  22. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Not to mention all this but with Google Voice integration too.

  23. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by omnichad · · Score: 1

    I may see if I can set up a Google Voice # for messaging only (no calls, and no SMS to my cell #)

    You can do this....and use the number with Hangouts for SMS messaging. Still no idea what the replacement for that will be when Hangouts is gone.

  24. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by s_p_oneil · · Score: 2

    I've read that the replacement is supposed to be the new and improved Android messaging app:

    https://gizmodo.com/how-the-ne...

    Which of course may mean it's flaky from non-phone devices, but they're supposed to be switching to RCS as quickly as they can. Maybe RCS will be less flaky from a desktop/laptop than SMS. Not sure.

  25. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

    Woops. Sorry, the new RCS app will be called "Google Chat", not "Android Messages".

    https://9to5google.com/2018/07...

    Not sure when it will be available, though.

  26. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem is how long will we have the replacement... With Google it will be around for a couple years, and then they will drop it, and release something else. So don't get used to it or count it.

  27. Nextcloud has a video/desktop sharing addon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is famous for bringing out new ideas, scaling them, discovering they aren't profitable, ignoring them, and finally killing them.

    Nextcloud has a video/desktop sharing addon called "talk". It isn't a complete replacement. There are others if all you want is text or screen or video camera sharing.

    There's less and less reason to use any cloudy services that will disappear. You can self-host these things. For a small business, it really isn't too hard. Many people, like me, self-hosts at home.

    If you miss google-reader, there are options.
    Check out the "sovereign" project on github for lots of other projects that can be self-hosted to avoid the google-killed-my-app problem.

  28. Google bad for innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I starts to hurt. They launch products, kill every other initiative because they attract most of the early adaptors and kill the bandwith for everyone else. Then they kill the product entirely.

    Whats left? Basically just Skype, maybe Zoom. Every other alternative lacks something.

  29. Re: Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transiti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.apps.googlevoice

  30. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by AncalagonTotof · · Score: 1

    WeChat ?
    Be sure to be monitored by Chinese gov.
    But the app does a pretty good job.

    To bad, I was trying to make my parents adopt HangOut, to replace poor quality phone communications. I'll need to train them again, on WeChat.
    Getting sick of managing dozens of SMS/MMS/Chat/Voice/Video apps.

    --
    Totof
  31. This sucks. I'm going to move to threema entirely. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    This is the reason you shouldn't even rely on one of the most powerful and rich companies on earth to provide a useful service over an extended period of time. I'm glad all my Google Accounts are throwaways.

    Hangouts is a neat, feasible zero-fuss communications package and I use it regularly. Once it goes, I'll switch to threema ( https://threema.ch/en/ -- recommended ) entirely.

    However, I'd like a neat web-centric video/VOIP chat solution, preferably one that doesn't get closed down 3 years in. Any suggestions?

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  32. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    WhatsApp works fine for this, so does Skype

  33. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Android Messages doesn't have video chat. Google Allo does, but there is no desktop client.

    Hangouts is great. Video, voice and text chat all in one place on mobile and desktop. Nothing else offers that.

    Hangouts has some other unique features, like the way it handles group chats. It shows the webcam/avatar of whoever is talking using the volume level of each participant, and it really helps stop people talking over each other.

    Damn it Google, why do you kill everything good? None of your other stuff comes close to Hangouts!

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  34. Finally. by vikingpower · · Score: 0

    I've always been of the opinion that grown-up men don't "hang out" - only teenagers do that. Hence I've never used, or proposed the use of, that awful thing that is Google Hangouts. Also, as one of the last entrenched BlackBerry OS users (yes, that's right: you'll have to pry that BlackBerry Passport from my cold, dead fingers), I was shielded from it anyways.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:Finally. by geek · · Score: 1

      I've always been of the opinion that grown-up men don't "hang out" - only teenagers do that. Hence I've never used, or proposed the use of, that awful thing that is Google Hangouts. Also, as one of the last entrenched BlackBerry OS users (yes, that's right: you'll have to pry that BlackBerry Passport from my cold, dead fingers), I was shielded from it anyways.

      Ok gramps, we'll all get off your lawn now.

  35. That sucks by ernstp · · Score: 1

    I've been using Hangout since the start, it's really a part of my life...

    1. Re:That sucks by DCFusor · · Score: 1

      It allowed people from all over the world to meet and discover our governments were all telling us lies about one another. This lead to all kinds of issues, so it had to be stopped, just like they are deplatforming anyone both logical and anti-communist.
      I recall one interesting hangout I was in as a musician, swapping licks with some other guys in Israel, Iran, Libya (when there was still a Libya). We were at it for most of an hour - no politics. This piqued my curiosity, so I brought it up. The response was interesting:
      Doug, you know your government is full of shit, right? Yeah.
      We are in smaller countries and ours is closer, you think we don't know ours are full of shit?
      Don't fall for the scams to try to make us hate and go to war for the people who own our governments!
      That message obviously pissed off some powerful folks, and it was becoming too widespread for the management. Their attempt at homepages like facefart was an obvious failure, but no one I know actually used that - we just chatted using the free video chat service, and only used text chat to set up calls.

      --
      Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    2. Re: That sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now you need to find out how to get your data out before they close it down.

  36. Re:Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transitio by geek · · Score: 1

    telegram still sucks, because it is based on phone number as an identifier

    Same with Signal. I really dont get why people rave over Signal, the crypto might be great but the app is total shit, development is slow as mud and they still insist on every permission under the sun to work on your device for, reasons. Plus you have to upload your fucking contacts to them to find anyone. Just shitty all around.

  37. Re:This sucks. I'm going to move to threema entire by geek · · Score: 2

    I'm not against closed source apps but ones that claim to be privacy centric that remain closed are problematic to me.

  38. Shutting down for consumers? by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 2

    What the hell does that mean? That the app will stop working, period, if you are just a consumer? That you will need some sort of contract with Google to get it work? And who/what is taking over its capabilities? The sorry Duo/Allo pair? Google Voice? No-one? Quite frankly, more and more it looks as though Google is run by very fickle, very stupid people that, outside the entrenched ad business that they have, are useless. Worse than useless, for they seem to have a knack for creating confusion apparently for no good reason. Probably Google managers striving to justify their (largely) unnecessary jobs. Larry, Sergey, are you having fun being mostly evil? And all for the sake of a few billions more, that you can't spend anyway?

    1. Re:Shutting down for consumers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone is just looking after their own interests. You don't get a promotion for good maintenance.

  39. Re:This sucks. I'm going to move to threema entire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with Hangouts/Threema and many many other popular platforms, is that they are all centralized.
    The centralization causes lockin, which when they get popular, inherently gives them power to do things that are not in users' best interests.

    Here in Netherlands, Whatsapp is king. Now they plan to put ads in Whatsapp. "Whaa we should all move to Signal!".
    Yeah, we should convince the entire country to shift the exact same power from this to that centralized solution, and hope it will be different this time?

    So, I recommend something decentralized, like XMPP or Riot.
    With those, just like email, you can choose your own client and server. You can choose to pay for it with either your money or your privacy. You can even choose to self-host with your own domain.
    If your client/host starts doing things you dont like (such as shutting down or pushing ads), just give them the finger, get another, and you can still reach everybody.

    If you want a concrete example of a good XMPP client+server/service, check out Conversations, or look at this list for other clients that have proper crypto (kinda similar to Whatsapp/Signal).

  40. Force my hand by CranberryKing · · Score: 1

    there are alternatives. I have been using various combinations of Tox, Signal, and others for a while now, but still fall back on Hangouts due to it's penetration. You knew you needed to take your communications back into your own hands at some point. This is just what everyone needs. We don't need to feed the hive mind anymore.

  41. Re: Alternative for seamless PC to mobile transiti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try discord - that seems to be current app of choice.

  42. WTF. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First it was Google Talk, then it was killed and I went with Hangouts to avoid Facebook (minimizing attack surfaces...)

    Now what? Allo?

    Does it exist on smartphones *and* computers? Because it's way hard to type in those tiny slabs...