Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Adds Real-Time Captions and Subtitles To Skype -- PowerPoint To Follow (betanews.com)

Skype is getting real-time captions and subtitles, and PowerPoint will have these features, too, next year. From a report: Ostensibly an accessibility feature (and launched on United Nations International Day of Persons with Disabilities), the new option means that Skype will be able to use voice recognition to show you the text of what is being said in a voice or video call. Microsoft will also bring the same feature to PowerPoint next year. Microsoft promises that live captions and subtitles are "optimized to be fast, continuous, and contextually updated as people speak", and in the current incarnation they will automatically scroll during a call. In a future update, however, it will be possible to manually scroll through subtitles and take advantage of additional viewing options.

53 comments

  1. Skype means NOTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only APK matters! Why are you wasting our time with MS propaganda? We need protection from malware/spyware/ads, not this nonsense!

    Use APK's hosts file engine and all your troubles will vanish. Use it today! Join his cause and commit your entire life to him!

    ALL HAIL APK

    1. Re:Skype means NOTHING by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I think it is neat. They FINALLY allow us users to read the NSA text transcripts.
      They should have had this ability ever since they switched Skype from a peer-to-peer protocol to a centralized one were all video fees go through their servers.

    2. Re:Skype means NOTHING by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      s/fees/feeds/

      sorry my mind slipped for a moment there...

  2. Hilarity ensues by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1, Funny

    >> Skype is getting real-time captions and subtitles, and PowerPoint will have these features

    Hilarity ensues. Can't wait for the first international conflict caused or massive business deal lost by a printed misinterpretation of garbled speech.

    1. Re:Hilarity ensues by Drethon · · Score: 1

      >> Skype is getting real-time captions and subtitles, and PowerPoint will have these features

      Hilarity ensues. Can't wait for the first international conflict caused or massive business deal lost by a printed misinterpretation of garbled speech.

      I'm pretty sure the software is better than it used to be, but this still kind of sums up my thoughts on the matter: http://ars.userfriendly.org/ca...

    2. Re:Hilarity ensues by zlives · · Score: 1

      not to mention what the censorship rules will "autocorrect" the text to.

    3. Re:Hilarity ensues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Hilarity ensues by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      Can't wait for ... misinterpretation of garbled speech.

      The Vodka Is Good But The Meat Is Rotten. Old translation error, not garbled. That'll make it even better.

      Voice: "We release these balloons in honor of our friendship and hope you find them beautiful". Skype: "You bastard, missiles away, pretty clouds arriving soon."

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    5. Re:Hilarity ensues by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The Vodka Is Good But The Meat Is Rotten. Old translation error, not garbled.

      FWIW Google translate still made that mistake well into the 2000s when they hard-coded the translation to be correct.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:Hilarity ensues by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Cod am pizza ship.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    7. Re:Hilarity ensues by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Even native English speakers in voice mail have hilarious Microsoft transcriptions. Even though it's out there, I don't think this service is really ready and was rolled out to customers by mistake. It's not getting better over time, I had a Skype voice mail last week that was nearly gibberish.

  3. coming soon, in a future update... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    In not too long, Microsoft will add color to the text:

    green -- your words are politically correct, citizen
    yellow -- getting dangerous, potential terrorism
    red -- obviously, you are a terrorist

    The color will train people how to think and communicate properly. That, and the stories about very bad things that happened to people after they saw the 'red words'.

    1. Re:coming soon, in a future update... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clippy will also be a future upgrade. Clippy will subconsciously suggest your Skype conversation.

    2. Re:coming soon, in a future update... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works much better to hide your score from the cus^H^H^Huser.

      Of course, for a price, someone else can snoop on you.

    3. Re:coming soon, in a future update... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      The Computer is your Friend, citizen.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  4. no more 2-way conversations by BringsApples · · Score: 4, Informative

    Big Brother is truly here now. Better to ditch Skype, if you haven't already done that 3 years ago.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    1. Re:no more 2-way conversations by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Big Brother is truly here now. Better to ditch Skype, if you haven't already done that 3 years ago.

      Where I work they ditched the exiting (very stable) chat software for Skype due to security reasons...

    2. Re:no more 2-way conversations by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a very standard case of clueless management. Microsoft has a built-in AI bot in all Skype conversations now. There's literally no way to be less secure.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    3. Re:no more 2-way conversations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was exiting then there is no surprise they ditched it!

    4. Re:no more 2-way conversations by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to live with that security risk if Microsoft adds a "Cover this meeting for me" button to their bot.

    5. Re:no more 2-way conversations by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      It will have that, but it'll require:

      access to create/delete contacts
      access to make and receive phone calls
      access to create/delete texts
      access to create/delete files
      access to send/receive emails
      access to camera
      access to create/delete videos/pictures
      access to GPS

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    6. Re:no more 2-way conversations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, how dull. How would you know if any given centrally routed video/chat application was or wasn't "monitoring" your super secret conversations?

      This place is full of dolts. Oh no, you mean my secret super secret convos that were previously routed through their servers and various pieces of software are now going through an additional piece of software!?!? Oh, the enormously large manatees!

    7. Re:no more 2-way conversations by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Big Brother is truly here now. Better to ditch Skype

      What are you talking about? Big brother has been known to be here in Skype for over half a decade. Not a single person will ditch Skype over this. Anyone concerned about privacy left long ago and the only remaining users don't give a crap.

  5. Perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Micro Soft Peach recognition is perfect. Their have bean no errors in peach recognition in the soft wear ever.

    All you knead is to speak clearly, and the peach recognizer will print out your peach.

    think of it, no miss steaks and errors in the output text of the recognized peach.

    1. Re:Perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet somehow you managed to get two nouns and a past tense of the verb "to recognize" correct.

      Work on your humor a bit more.

    2. Re:Perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whereas all you did was be pedantic.

  6. It'll understand those callers from "Windows"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how a machine can understand those people who call to report that I have a computer problem with my Windows and they're happy to fix it for free. I would think that humans are FAR more capable than machines at language interpretation, and I fail miserably at it.

  7. Microsoft promises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did they also promise to provide various government agencies with transcripts of everything?

    it is, after all, the primary motivator here... not "accessibility" for the user (microsoft doesn't give a fuck about them), but for the government. having to siphon, process, and store all that video and audio is expensive and requires massively-huge data centers in the desert. transcripts are text. much, much smaller, compressible and easily searched.

  8. Alternatives? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    This is fairly scary. Honest question, does anyone know of an alternative to Skype? It should have the following: - Work seamlessly on every PC and mobile OS - Allow mobile sharing of images/files - Group/solo text messaging - Voice calls, conference calls - Group/solo video calling - File transfers for binaries and screen shots/images - A company not transcribing calls

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      see jitsi.org

    2. Re:Alternatives? by zlives · · Score: 1

      meh, try webex... i am sure there is a on prem solution that is available if you are security concious even from MS side.

    3. Re:Alternatives? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Oh I forgot "free"

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    4. Re:Alternatives? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      This just seems to do video calls. Also, doesn't seem to be native Windows or MacOS applications. I despise web applications. Browsers are made for websites, not applications.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    5. Re:Alternatives? by zlives · · Score: 1

      Free and Secure don't work anymore unless you are capable to roll your own.... and if you are talking about mobile devices... all bets are off.

    6. Re:Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seem to me that "Works seamlessly on every PC and mobile OS" is easier to achieve if at least on the desktop you have can have it work in any HTML 5 compliant browser. So you requirements are it needs to be free and executable for any OS an end user might want to use; webapps not allowed? Is something java based o.k?

    7. Re:Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why exactly is this "scary"? You were aware that your conversation was already going through their servers, right?

    8. Re: Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These transcripts make it trivial to spy on millions of hours of conversations that would be impossible to listen to due to time.
      Now they can just search for keywords and steal your work.

      Inb4 MS would never use someone else's work.

    9. Re:Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      webex? I think they were after better than skype, not exponentially worse.

    10. Re: Alternatives? by gravewax · · Score: 1

      what the fuck? you think before this people weren't transcribing automatically for recorded calls? I guarantee you anyone interested in the content that was already abusing access will have been doing that for a long long time. The only difference here is the transcription is also available for the legitimate users.

    11. Re:Alternatives? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Oh how adorable. Have you ever met a Windows admin? Why do you think people are flocking to hosted skype? The droves of incompetent Windows admins still left over from yesteryear who cant script infrastructure to save their life, that's why. Nobody can keep anything running on-prem anymore. Microsoft and everyone else has given up.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    12. Re:Alternatives? by zlives · · Score: 1

      Microsoft and everyone else has given up... on security :)

  9. VR PowerPoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scared me there for a second. The title, if read a certain way, implies that after real-time captioning that theyâ(TM)d be implementing real-time PowerPoints. I mean, could you imagine being surrounded by virtual pie charts and bar graphs, not to mention badly animated clip art and inappropriate sound effects popping up out of nowhere?

  10. Needed for Microsoft support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The foreigners that provide Microsoft 'support' claim to be speaking English but I usually can't understand them. Maybe Skype can tell me what they are really saying. I guess its asking too much to include translation too.

  11. Translation: they are recording what you say by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Just saying.

    Big Brother is captioning you, and testing it's accent translation software for the military industrial complex.

    (mind you, I saw the original military intel specs where they planned to do this, so I'm not that surprised, even if you are)

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Translation: they are recording what you say by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter, resistance remains totally and utterly ethereal, never seen on election day where it's needed most. Who's even "surprised" anymore?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Translation: they are recording what you say by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Just saying.

      Just saying what? Common knowledge? They've been recording and analysing Skype conversations for years. There are literally no new privacy implications in this.

  12. meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In our enterprise environment I've had to support the steaming pile of dung that is Skype, ahem I meant Lync. I cannot say just how bloated this app has become and it doesn't work most of the time except, if you're lucky, for texting. All of the features that made skype wonderful are almost unusable. I mean, before M$ bought it, it was slowly growing fat. But downloading the entire office core just to run it is insane.

    1. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, even that IM features of Skype for business are just disgusting; ctrl-enter (which used to add a newline to message on Skype for pleasure) opens up now a video call. Paste-as-text pastes text in bold. The previous chat sessions are mostly lost at least partially, and to add insult to injury, the broken chat history messages in Outlook usually are there multiple times. One can not disable the conversions of ":s" and others to emoticons. And so on and so on. The Skype for business is easily the worst chat messaging application I have ever had to use. Even the MS Teams was better than S4B, but MS had to deprecate that as it likely did not suck enough.

  13. I seem to recall, not that long ago by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    "Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all."

    Courtesy of Microsoft....

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:I seem to recall, not that long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12+ years ago, they've come a long way...

  14. On the other hand... by balbeir · · Score: 1

    Add translation to that and I may be able to figure out what is being said in Chinese during the next call to Shenzen. The chinglish that is being spoken on those calls is undecipherable anyway.

  15. Paranoia. by westlake · · Score: 1

    Big Brother is truly here now. Better to ditch Skype, if you haven't already done that 3 years ago.

    In the US, IP telephone captioning for the disabled is a free service provided by the federal government --- transcription by human operators not automated speech recognition. Can't Hear on The Phone? Explain to why having an operator captioning your calls over an open line is more secure and less intrusive than an automated system doing the same over an encrypted link.

    Not to mention that access to Skype's service doesn't require filing a certificate from your doctor or other proof of disability., which is not a trivial disclosure,

  16. Brought to you by Spyware 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Spyware 10 (Formerly named Windows) not only steals your data without your consent, but invades other parts of your life as well. Don't feel like data theft from your O/S is enough? Try our new product!