Slashdot Mirror


Will AWS Be Spun Off Into a Separate Company? (businessinsider.com)

Ammalgam writes from a report via Business Insider: A credible business school professor who correctly predicted that Amazon would buy Whole Foods now says an AWS spinoff is inevitable. Marketing guru Scott Galloway said Monday at Business Insider's IGNITION conference. The move will also help the company placate regulators who are starting to scrutinize its anticompetitive practices, said Scott Galloway, a professor at New York University's Stern School of Business. After the e-commerce giant spins it off, Amazon Web Services (AWS) "will be one of 10 most valuable companies in the world," he said. "The question then becomes, what happens to the old retail-side of Amazon," Galloway added.

Amazon will decide to split off AWS, because it makes a lot of sense and market forces will dictate it, Galloway said. Cloud computing is one of the most important trends taking place in the technology industry, but there's no simple way for investors to profit off it. The three biggest cloud services -- AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud -- are all part of much bigger companies whose results only partially reflect their cloud businesses. As the biggest of the bunch, AWS would be a natural to become its own standalone business, he said. And it could be a huge windfall for Amazon shareholders. Depending on how it would be valued and the multiple to earnings that the market would assign to it, AWS by itself could be see a valuation of anywhere from $70 billion to $600 billion, he said. What do you think? Is this possible?

11 of 84 comments (clear)

  1. 'huge windfall for Amazon shareholder' by monkeyxpress · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only an investment banker would think like that. If you take the same technological infrastructure, pull it out of one company and shove it into another while distributing the new shareholding pro-rata, why exactly is there an expectation that suddenly this 'huge windfall' of new value has been created?

    No new value has been created. If anything there will be higher costs from duplicated overheads. The fact that despite this the claim is probably correct and shareholders will get a big bump if this happens (just like when a company does a share split) is testament to how screwed up the economy's idea of 'value' is right now.

    I mean, what a mockery this makes of all the work the engineering teams have to put in to add new capacity and services. Why don't we retrain all our engineers as financial innovators. Then our society can become really rich right?

    1. Re:'huge windfall for Amazon shareholder' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It allows for independent valuation of assets which reduces uncertainty and can increase investment value.

      Amazon's retail business is a low margin and high fixed cost monster. Amazon faces stiff competition from newcomers as well as old school brick and mortar companies (e.g., Walmart) willing to burn money to compete in the e-commerce space. While not on the verge of bankruptcy, it will never be a cash generating machine in the current competitive environment.

      AWS is a high margin monster with limited competition and a high degree of lock-in and network effects. These tend to be sustainable sources of value/returns.

      As of right now, anyone investing in AWS has to take the risk that AWS profits will be funneled off to cover losses in Amazon's retail business (this is what happens today). With AWS spun off, it eliminates that risk. Reducing risk raises valuation.

      It is not uncommon for conglomerates to be worth more separate than together.

    2. Re:'huge windfall for Amazon shareholder' by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Only an investment banker would think like that./p>

      When it comes to share prices- they're the only ones that matter. A share's value has more to do with how much investment bankers think a business is worth (or will be worth) than it has to do with what that company is actually worth on paper.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  2. Can Amazon afford to do that? by MikeRT · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A large part of the value that AWS provides Amazon is that they are able to consume AWS for their own infrastructure, with paying customers helping to defray the cost of operations. In addition to that, Amazon will lose a non-trivial percentage of its best infrastructure people where currently AWS folks are part of the labor pool they can use.

  3. Amazon/Nokia by Colourspace · · Score: 4, Funny

    Interesting how both Amazon and Nokia both started as companies dealing in paper but have eventually ended up in tech. Maybe I should open a library?

  4. Re:AWS has been around for a long time by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it made sense to spin it off, it would have been done by now.

    Two economists are walking down the street. One says "Hey look, there is a $20 bill lying on the ground!" The other says, "No, that is impossible because if there was really money lying on the ground, somebody else would have already picked it up."

  5. Propping up Retail Side by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not entirely sure Amazon can spin out AWS given it largely backfills the losses on the retail side. Without the cloud cash cow to cover it, Amazon will have to cut back on a lot of its experimentation (drones, cashless stores, Alexa, etc.) and focus on trying to drive down costs to beat their slim margins.

  6. The only money making part of Amazon by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The AWS is the only money making part of Amazon. If it is spun off, rest of Amazon will collapse.

    Since Amazon retail competes with so many sectors and has announced it is going to get into banking, pharmacy, etc, many other companies loathe to use AWS. They are worried AWS would be able to hack in and peek into their data. Even if the data is really secure and secret, they hate giving money to a competitor. So if it is spun off, it might gain more customers and become even more profitable. But rest of Amazon has great brand name and loyalty, but very small profit potential. Its main appeal is low cost. So it can't raise prices all that easily.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  7. Not anytime soon by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bezos has never done things to be "a huge windfall for Amazon shareholders". He's been running the whole company at almost zero retained profit, dumping cash into expansion at every opportunity. He's never really cared about shareholders like that. Why would he suddenly change now?

    Investing in Amazon is like investing in a startup. You know all the cash is going to grow, and you hope it becomes super-profitable later. Which is kinda cool that he's been able to maintain that for decades.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
    1. Re:Not anytime soon by Gavagai80 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Amazon made $1,600,000,000 profit in the first quarter of this year, $2,500,000,000 profit in the second quarter, $2,800,000,000 profit in the third quarter. I'd hardly call that almost zero retained profit.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  8. Not any time soon by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A credible business school professor who correctly predicted that Amazon would buy Whole Foods now says an AWS spinoff is inevitable.

    Just because he guessed right once doesn't mean he'll guess right again. And I don't think Bezos gives a shit what short term windfall shareholders might want.

    While a spinoff is certainly a possibility, I don't think it will happen any time soon. Part of the reason Amazon was able to make that business work is because it makes use of excess capacity on servers they already had to buy for other purposes. There also is something of a dog-fooding component to the business where Amazon learns what works and what doesn't on their own business which has some obvious utility. Now AWS has become kind of its own thing rather than a way to just use excess servers but there still is a lot of benefit to them to have both under the same roof.

    I do think that AWS will be a huge business and possibly eventually much bigger than their retail operations. But for the near future I think there is much too much synergy between them to justify a spinoff.