Slashdot Mirror
Intel Optimistic About Its Next-Gen 7nm Process Technology (anandtech.com)
From a report: Originally planned to enter mass production in the second half of 2016, Intel's 10 nm process technology is still barely used by the company today. Currently the process is used to produce just a handful of CPUs, ahead of an expected ramp to high-volume manufacturing (HVM) only later in 2019. Without a doubt, Intel suffered delays on its 10 nm process by several years, significantly impacting the company's product lineup and its business. Now, as it turns out, Intel's 10 nm may be a short-living node as the company's 7 nm tech is on-track for introduction in accordance with its original schedule.
For a number of times Intel said that it set too aggressive scaling/transistor density targets for its 10 nm fabrication process, which is why its development ran into problems. Intel's 10 nm manufacturing tech relies exclusively on deep ultraviolet lithography (DUVL) with lasers operating on a 193 nm wavelength. To enable the fine feature sizes that Intel set out to achieve on 10 nm, the process had to make heavy usage of mutli-patterning. According to Intel, a problem of the process was precisely its heavy usage of multipatterning (quad-patterning to be more exact).
For a number of times Intel said that it set too aggressive scaling/transistor density targets for its 10 nm fabrication process, which is why its development ran into problems. Intel's 10 nm manufacturing tech relies exclusively on deep ultraviolet lithography (DUVL) with lasers operating on a 193 nm wavelength. To enable the fine feature sizes that Intel set out to achieve on 10 nm, the process had to make heavy usage of mutli-patterning. According to Intel, a problem of the process was precisely its heavy usage of multipatterning (quad-patterning to be more exact).
Intel will now re-label their 10nm as 7nm.
And before you go there, Intel was the first company to lie about node size.
"His name was James Damore."
With chip makers struggling to make faster chips, this is a good time to make a stand to stop companies from making comparable hardware obsolete--just because they want to sell chips. If they can make faster chips then buy them, but please do not buy side-graded hardware, that's no better than what you have--because it fills up the landfills. My 7-year-old intel 2600k is only 30% slower than current quad-core offerings. I need more cores, but I am not throwing this motherboard, chip, and memory out, any time soon.
https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
The 10nm delays were hailed as "the end of intel!" and "AMD will destroy them" and other kinds of ridiculous things, over a year ago.
A year later and I'll say, these delays are very significant now, it's very likely that AMD will genuinely have a processor out that has superior process technology in it. May not be faster due to design but the gap closing faster.
Also, Intel 7nm chips will be superior to other "7nm" chips out there, since companies kind of just make up the numbers now. Intel 10nm = TMSC 7nm basically. Quite frustrating.
Regardless Intel needs this, 14nm is seriously long in the tooth for Intel and there are very obvious limitations to what can be done for efficiency, performance, they're very much running out improvements.
Given that the diameter of a silicon atom is around 0.2nm, that means they are now building transistors out of something like 30-35 atoms across. How far down can this go before it all disappears in some kind of quantum uncertainty blob?
Comment removed based on user account deletion
AMD already has a *much* better processor out there. Because businesses calculate in dollars per performance. They like as many cores as possible with the fastest interconnects.
In all of those aspects, Intel currently is a joke, compared to AMD.
Which is exactly, why Epyc processors are currently making big cuts into Intel's Xeon revenues.
Intel is currently in panic mode.
It's really pathetic, how Intel fanboys always cling to the one thing they have left: Meltdown-included single core performance.
By acting as if that's equal to "speed". Because current generation games are still programmed for consoles with very few threads. And a few algorithms can't be parallelized.
Which will be meaningless, as soon as the next consoles come out, and because nobody in the real world runs just one algorithm at the same time on his system.
And no, Intel's "7nm" will not be superior to other "7nm" chips, because it WILL be Intel's 10nm process! ^^
(Intel came up with it, btw, according to the current top comment.)
Grow up. You are not Intel. You don't have to project your self-worth onto something else, just because you subconsciously think your own life sucks so much. Your life could be much greater, if you'd actually deal with it, instead of running away.