Slashdot Mirror


What it's Like To Work in the Biggest Building in the World (bbc.com)

To build a fleet of giant airliners requires a building just as big. Boeing's Everett Factory, built to construct the famous 747, is the biggest enclosed structure in the world. BBC Future: When you're building some of the world's biggest airliners, you need an equally outsized building. When Boeing decided to build the 747 -- a plane so big it would become known around the world as the jumbo jet -- they had to build a factory large enough to build several of them at the same time. If you've ever seen a 747 from close quarters you'll know just how giant Boeing's jumbo is. So it's no surprise the factory which ended up building has to be very big indeed. How big? Try the biggest enclosed building in the world.

Boeing started work on the Everett factory in 1967, just as the Boeing 747 project was starting to gather pace. Bill Allen, Boeing's charismatic chief, had realised the company would need a huge amount of space if they were going to build an airliner big enough to carry 400 passengers. They chose an area of woodland some 22 miles (35km) north of Seattle, near an airport that had served as a fighter base during World War Two. [...] Today, the Everett factory easily dwarfs any other building in the world by volume, with the Guinness Book of Records reporting that it occupies 72 million cubic feet (13.3 million cubic metres).

[...] Each shift has as many as 10,000 workers, and there are three shifts each day. Over the course of 24 hours, the factory has a population only a little less than the Australian city of Alice Springs. Reese has worked for Boeing for 38 years -- 11 of them running the factory tours -- but says he can still remember his first impression of the factory. "It was very awe-inspiring the first time -- and I would have to say every day since, too. It changes constantly. Each day there's something new." The Everett factory is so big that there's a fleet of some 1,300 bicycles on hand to help cut travel time. It has its own fire station and medical services on station, and an array of cafes and restaurants to feed the thousands of workers.

70 comments

  1. Typical Editing by tsqr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    An summary pointing to an article about the biggest building in the world, that doesn't contain any information about how large the building actually is. Nice job, Slashdot.

    Spoiler from TFA: it occupies 72 million cubic feet (13.3 million cubic metres).

    1. Re: Typical Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet it is stunning

    2. Re:Typical Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's such a strange way to calculate it, I had to see if there was a reason behind using volume instead of area.

      There is. It's not the largest building the way anyone normally measure buildings (area). The largest building is actually the Aalsmeer Flower Auction.

      However, by volume, Boeing has the largest.

    3. Re:Typical Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know which figure is correct, but the conversion is obviously wrong. There are over 35 cubic feet in a cubic meter.

    4. Re:Typical Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can easily see that the conversion is wrong. There are about three feet to the meter (A yard is roughly a meter and there are three feet per yard. Who cares about the exact number, we're converting from hillbilly units). 3x3x3 is 27 cubic feet to the cubic meter. 72/27 is less than 3, not 13.3. TFA is wrong.

    5. Re:Typical Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A video is worth 1000 words ...

      Boeing Everett Factory - National Geographic

    6. Re:Typical Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the largest building the way anyone normally measure buildings (area).

      Who the hell normally measures an entire building by area? That makes no sense. Unless you mean the sum of the area per floor, then I suppose it would make sense. But since you claimed the largest is the Aalsmeer Flower Auction and not the New Century Global Center, I suspect that that is not how you are measuring.

    7. Re:Typical Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I did a tour once, it was pretty big. They told us that they had to fix the building because it had it's own weather system and would rain inside sometimes in the afternoon.

    8. Re:Typical Editing by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 2

      *looks at my 12x24 workshop*

      *Looks at 72 million cubic feet workshop*

      I need a new workshop. *Starting working on business case to convince wife*

    9. Re:Typical Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just promise her her own private 747.

    10. Re:Typical Editing by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      First World problems!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    11. Re:Typical Editing by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Spoiler from TFA: it occupies 72 million cubic feet (13.3 million cubic metres).

      72 million cubic feet = 2 million cubic meters.

      According to Wikipedia, it is 472 million cubic feet = 13.3 million cubic meters.

    12. Re:Typical Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They address this as a myth in the article.

    13. Re: Typical Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gigs factory is awfully close to flower market by area of 5.5m ft. Boeing definitely still wins with volume.

    14. Re:Typical Editing by jbengt · · Score: 2

      72,000,000 cubic feet as the largest building in the world seems like it might be a typo to me - it seems that more space would be needed for building several 747s at a time.
      I just worked on a new hangar for a major airline which was sized to work on a couple of wide body jets or three narrow bodies (not even a jumbo jet) and I calculate it to be around 20,000,000 cubic feet, give or take. The new hangar is connected to an old hangar of similar size, which technically makes the combined two hangars a single building, at least according to the building code officials. Also, it's not the largest hangar at that airport, and that airport is not where airlines sends their planes when they need a major overhaul.

    15. Re:Typical Editing by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Floor area is the usual metric for the size of a building. Leasable floor area is the important number for most commercial buildings.

    16. Re:Typical Editing by jbengt · · Score: 1

      That makes much more sense. 72 million cubic feet just seemed too small to be the largest building in the world.

    17. Re:Typical Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you were almost certainly spitballing it, but in case not -- a metre != yard.

    18. Re:Typical Editing by mlyle · · Score: 1

      You're right. It's ~472,000,000 cubic feet.

      Cubic units are always misleading for how "small" they are.

    19. Re:Typical Editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10% difference, good enough.

  2. News? by necro81 · · Score: 1

    The scale of the manufacturing is indeed awesome, and the boldness of the 747 program is likewise good to remember.

    However,...

    How is a description of a 50-year old factory, which doesn't actually make the 747 anymore, qualify as news?

    1. Re:News? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      The scale of the manufacturing is indeed awesome, ...

      Tell me about it.

      One thing I heard about at the time (so I don't know for SURE if it was true, having just rumor, not personal experience or documentation) was the incremental plotter capable of making full-sized engineering drawings - of the entire plane. (Wow!)

      Allegedly this consisted of a "plotter bed" the size of a hanger floor, with embedded wires to serve as the "windings" of a two-dimensional stepper motor. (I think the paper was held down by a vaccuum.) Add a "puck" with a pen, a vertical actuator, and a ground-effect vents, with the pen-lift controled and air supplied by a cable from the hanger roof (I imagine a hanger-sized coil-cord), and you would soon be able to see "the big picture". B-)

      Or if you had smaller stuff to draw but needed multiple copies, just put several pucks on at the same time. They'd move in unison.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:News? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      ... embedded wires to serve as the "windings" of a two-dimensional [linear] stepper motor.

      Note that "stepper" motors don't HAVE to move in increments of the pole spacing (though many have pole pieces shaped to encourage this.) If the pole pieces are properly shaped, they can also be operated as a polyphase analog motor and driven to positions arbitrarily dividing the cycle. Then the electronics can provide "steps" substantially finer than the pole spacing (or even "pure analog" positioning). At displacements smaller than the winding spacing you get progressively less accurate, but you can still manage pretty good location control.

      Also: Even with big steps you can draw a really accurate line (straight or curved) by taking advantage of the mass of the drawing system and the timing of the steps.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  3. What about this bridge? by AndyKron · · Score: 0

    Is it close to this bridge in Everett? https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    1. Re:What about this bridge? by pahles · · Score: 1

      Bridge?

      --
      Sig?
    2. Re:What about this bridge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That bridge is a few miles northeast of Boeing.

    3. Re:What about this bridge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The overpass is on the opposite side of Everett from the Boeing plant

  4. 72 m cubit feet is not 13.3 m cubic metres by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > the Guinness Book of Records reporting that it occupies 72 million cubic feet (13.3 million cubic metres).

    72 million cubit feet is 2 million cubic metres
    13.3 million cubic metres is 470 million cubic feet

    https://www.metric-conversions.org/volume/cubic-feet-to-cubic-meters.htm

  5. Good journalism by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

    Uses metrics the layman can easily relate to.

    Listing 72 million cubic feet without some other big famous building to compare it to - I can't visualize 72 million cubic feet...

    Also it looks like the author just googled city populations around 25000 and picked the nearest one, I had never heard of April Springs...

    Ok, maybe I am just dumb - but good journalism uses comparisons even us dummies can understand. The art of good journalism writing is dead.

    1. Re:Good journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think we can all agree that we're not looking at a work of journalism here. It's fluff. Nobody checked anything. The conversion from cubic feet to cubic meters is quite off: 72 million cubic feet is not 13.3 million cubic meters. It's just 2 million cubic meters. Then the article quotes a tour guide explaining that you could fit 13 Wembley Stadiums in the volume of the factory. Guess what, you can't. The bowl volume of Wembley Stadium is 1139100 cubic meters. It wouldn't even fit twice. With journalists not fact checking even the simplest numbers, is it any wonder that politicians and industry don't fear the press anymore?

    2. Re:Good journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, my mistake: It's not a conversion error. Wembley Stadium does fit almost 13 times by volume, which is 13.3 cubic meters, but it's not 72 million cubic feet: It's 472 million cubic feet. Someone dropped a four on the floor.

    3. Re:Good journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is that better or worse than a three on a tree? I know it's not as creepy as an Elf on a Shelf.

    4. Re: Good journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. Can someone smart please say how many Costcos this would be? Or football fields?

    5. Re:Good journalism by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Even just giving the dimensions would be helpful. How god damn hard is that to figure out? Here is their fact sheet, which is a ton more helpful than the negative value the author added to this piece.

      114 feet tall by 1614 feet wide by 3500 feet long. In convenient units, that's about ten stories tall, and a third of a mile wide by two thirds of a mile long. That I can picture. And it's fucking huge.

      But why is this on /. again?

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    6. Re:Good journalism by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Listing 72 million cubic feet without some other big famous building to compare it to - I can't visualize 72 million cubic feet...

      First, it is NOT 72 million cubic feet. It is 472 million cubic feet. The author of TFA apparently mismoused the 4 during the cut-and-paste operation.

      The Library of Congress has 2,100,000 square feet. If we assume a floor-to-floor distance of 10 feet, that would be 21 million cubic feet.

      So this factory is the size of 472/21 = 22.5 LoC.

      I had never heard of April Springs...

      It is 'Alice', not 'April'. Alice Springs is famous mostly for being located precisely in the middle of nowhere.

      Alice Springs, Australia

    7. Re: Good journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The old Cleveland tank plant now called the IX center is 2.2 million cubic feet for comparison. They use to work on B25 bombers there too. I actually own a platform ladder that was used to reach the bombers.

      -geekpoet

    8. Re:Good journalism by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      Talk about a good mix of useful and useless measurements:

      • 3,320,000,000 sixteen-ounce pop cans could fit inside
      • 75 National Football League (NFL) football fields could fit inside
    9. Re:Good journalism by turp182 · · Score: 1

      I'll use the Library of Congress unit method.

      The James Madison Memorial Building (only 1 of 3 buildings comprising the Library, but the largest) has about 17.4 million cubic feet of internal space (87 ft tall, 400 wide, 500 deep).

      So 72 million cubic feet is about 4.14 Library's of Congress.

      April Springs is not a unit of measure I am not familiar with.

      James Madison building dimensions:
      https://www.emporis.com/buildi...

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    10. Re: Good journalism by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Good point. Can someone smart please say how many Costcos this would be? Or football fields?

      Costcos aren't all the same size. (Football fields would work, if you're neglecting the stands and the space between the field proper and the audience..)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    11. Re:Good journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the Alice Springs population? Is this some new metric unit I never learned in school?

  6. Only by volume by johannesg · · Score: 4, Informative

    By footprint, the flower auction in Aalsmeer is quite a bit larger (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aalsmeer_Flower_Auction)

    I worked there for a while, many years ago. We got around on bicycles; customers on the far end of the building were half an hour from our office (which lay on one of the corners). There were very few signs around the building, so you had to know where you were going. Having said that, various areas had a different feel to them - in that sense it was like a city. Travelling by bike was fairly dangerous, as you shared the 'roads' with the electrical 'trains' that carry the flowers to and from.

    Work starts at six in the morning, and finishes at around two in the afternoon. There is a visitor gallery, running above the floor where the actual work happens. It's worth a visit - but do come in the morning, as it is mostly deserted in the afternoon.

    1. Re:Only by volume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you also worry about that thing in your pants being small by volume yet HUGE IN LENGTH (and probably uncut also).

    2. Re:Only by volume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think thats a better statement.
      518,000m is quite a bit larger than 399,480 m. Now that said, that is without things like cellar or floors. If we go by the list, Tropical Islands Resort is Germany is 5th sorted by volume, but only has a floor area of 70,000 m. That might be 7*1kilometers,.

      Meter do not make sense as a measurement for building size either, since its only roof height unless anything else is noted. Wikipedia article also lists "Floor area" by the plot of land, not by the stacking amount of space used by the floors.

    3. Re:Only by volume by houghi · · Score: 1

      You are mixing m and m^2 (and m^3)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:Only by volume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The true horror of slashdot not supporting M^2 and M^3 as symbols.

  7. Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How big is the building that Airbus builds the A380 in?

    1. Re:Makes me wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Answering my own question.

      https://new.abb.com/low-voltage/products/building-automation/service-and-tools/references/airbus-a380-final-assembly-hall

      says 31,000m^2 floor space with a ceiling height of 24m; 744,000m^3

  8. The Biggest?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure it's the biggest?

    A fair amount of those cubic feet are up in the rafters, actually unusable space.

    By comparison the US Pentagon has 5 million square feet, and it's 71 feet tall, which gives it a volume of 350 million cubic feet, and it's almost all usable space.

    1. Re:The Biggest?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just found this: comparison of the Pentagon vs the Boeing factory:
      https://mapfight.appspot.com/b...

      Note it is using area, not volume.

  9. BBC metric conversion fail by jensend · · Score: 1

    It can't be both 72 million cu.ft and 13.3 million cu.m. A foot is 0.3048 meters so a cubic meter is over 31.3 cubic feet. No idea how someone would come up with a cubic meter being 5.4 cubic feet.

    13.3 million cubic meters is correct; that's 470 million cubic feet.

    1. Re:BBC metric conversion fail by PPH · · Score: 1

      This is Boeing. The original volume figures are probably in hogsheads.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:BBC metric conversion fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The correct number is on Boeing's website. It's 472 million cubic feet. Not 72 million cubic feet.

  10. Used to work there by PPH · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lots of nice hiding places.

    I actually worked in a nearby engineering building, but our techs had shop space in the main factory building. So I'd walk through the plant and watch the planes being built. A lot more interesting than the public tour.

    When I visited our shop, I'd take one of a few shortcuts through what is a rabbit warren of passages, offices, store rooms, etc. One area consisted of a bunch of lunch tables with people sitting around, reading the paper or playing cards. When I'd walk through, most of the time, I'd dress casually. So I blended in with the factory work force. But occasionally, I'd wear a suit. And I'd go walking through this area. Immediately, a guy that (I assume) was the group supervisor ran out and asked if he could help me. With a pretty frightened look on his face. So I asked our techs what was up with these people. It seems that their boss had managed to carve himself out a 'do nothing' task and assemble a group of his buddies. Who spent their day just reading the paper and playing cards. But they are buried so deeply in the factory building that nobody would find them. Except for some guy who looked like he was from corporate, wandering around asking questions.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Used to work there by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      I think every big company has at least one group like that, that has a "do nothing" task.

      At SimDesk, a now-defunct tech company, they called that department "R&D". If somebody got moved to R&D, you knew they couldn't quite cut it, but they didn't want to fire them. R&D didn't actually do any research or development, they just messed around.

      Many companies just call this department "the executive suite."

  11. Outsource that shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Manufacturing is terrible! Send that work to China so we can all be stock brokers and waitresses!

  12. Cheating at Benchmarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's only the largest by VOLUME, because it has to be so tall to accommodate the airliners under construction.

    By the measure that the world actually uses, which is square feet, it is not even close to the largest building in the world. It's only about one quarter the size of the largest, and there are plenty of runners up in between.

    1. Re:Cheating at Benchmarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      measure that the world actually uses, which is square feet

      Nobody uses that, except you yanks.

  13. we wuz kangs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whitey stole the blueprints for this building and the technology to make it from noble african kangz
    reparations when?

  14. It's actually kind of nice in there by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Just went on a tour there and enjoyed it, liked the cafe inside and the nearby shop display building, saw quite a few of the new planes being built, including those not yet assembled. Nicer than the place we used to design drones in.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  15. Urban growth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alice Springs is a city? The author has picked the wrong magnification on their telescope.

    It's a town.

  16. Tesla GF1 has a bigger foot print by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    GF1 has a bigger foot print and it is three floors, so floor space or carpet area GF1 is the biggest building.

    The Space Shuttle assembly building is the world's tallest enclosed space. It rains inside the building. Boeing Everette also rains inside I heard. not sure if its true.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  17. At the end of the work day by nwaack · · Score: 1

    Zuckerberg stores the building neatly back in his poop shoot. Nice and tidy.

  18. Looking out my cube window at two production lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a bad place to work.
    Still get a "Holy Crap! We build airplanes here!" feelz when I walk in.